Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
alcoholism
alcoholism
Search
Alcoholism
1. 2. 3. Home Health Alcoholism
Email Print
18/1a9 2
Sign Up
Discuss in my Forum
Filed In:
1. Drunk Driving
Sponsored Links
You can stop drinkingA whole new approach that works Learn why people love this programwww.mywayout.org Lower High Blood PressureYour Arterys are Clogged. Clean Them Fast, Easy, Safe & Painlesswww.bloodpressurewarning.com/ Lose Double ChinProven Double Chin Exercises & Diet To Get Rid Double Chin In 30Days!PerfectCheekbones.com/DoubleChin Alcoholism Ads
Alcohol Withdrawal Symptoms Alcoholism and Liver How to Stop Drinking Chronic Alcoholism Alcoholism Guide Communities can decrease alcohol-related fatal crashes by providing better access to substance abuse treatment while reducing the availability of alcohol in the community, according to a new study supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). "These results show that concentrated, community-wide interventions can save lives," notes NIAAA Director Ting-Kai Li, M.D. "This is the first study to explore the effect of the combined use of increased individually-oriented substance abuse treatment and environmental strategies to reduce alcohol availability." Researchers led by Ralph W. Hingson, Sc.D, Professor at the Boston University School of Public Health and Center to Prevent Alcohol Problems Among Young People, analyzed traffic fatality statistics in communities that had received "Fighting Back" grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Beginning in January, 1992 twelve such grants were awarded to communities throughout the United States to support the implementation of 10-year programs aimed at reducing substance abuse and related problems. The communities developed 15 different kinds of programs or actions that targeted alcohol abuse, including increasing publicly-funded treatment, establishing awareness campaigns about treatment services, initiating hospital emergency department alcohol screening and referral, conducting responsible beverage trainings, and enacting ordinances to prohibit public drinking. "The efforts of five Fighting Back communities - Kansas City, MO; Milwaukee, WI; San Antonio, TX; Santa Barbara, CA; and Vallejo, CA - were considered 'concentrated' because they implemented eight or more actions to restrict alcohol availability and expand treatment," explains Dr. Hingson. Other Fighting Back communities implemented between two and six actions.
Suggested Reading
Alcohol and TraumaAlcohol-Related ImpairmentDUI - The Costs
Related Articles
Substance Abuse in the 21st Century Older Adults More Likely to Abuse Alcohol, Not Drugs Community Concepts Alcohol and Drug Treatment of Poland ME Alcohol and the Workplace Community Alcohol and Drug Aftercare Program of Dallas TX
Sponsored Links
Alcoholism TreatmentExclusive and Complete Resources on Alcoholism treatment.healthlibrary.net/drug-abuse.html Knowing your PersonalityMost detailed Personality Assessment on the Internetwww.personality100.com Drunk DrivingCauses of Drunk Driving Use Healthline's Symptom Search nowwww.healthline.com/symptomsearch Alcoholism SummaryA Complete Academic Resource 513 Pages of Related ContentBookRags.com 13 Signs of BurnoutAvoiding Stress, Depression and Burnout by expert Henry Neilswww.assessment.com
Advertisement
Explore Alcoholism
Must Reads
What Is Alcoholism? Symptoms of Alcoholism Diagnosis of Alcoholism Treatment of Alcoholism A Family Disease
Most Popular
Alcoholism Screening QuizAdult Child of Alcoholics Screening QuizSymptoms of AlcoholismSymptoms of Alcohol WithdrawalAre You Troubled by Someone's Drinking?
18/1gG 2 http://alcoholism.a http://alcoholism.a +:gs::alcoholism 1 Enter email ad
Sign Up
By Category
Alcoholism 101 About Drug Abuse Effects of Alcohol Do I Have A Problem? How to Quit Find a Meeting 12 Step Recovery Support for Families College Drinking Binge Drinking Facts for Teens Drunk Driving Treatment / Rehab Women and Alcohol
Parenting Tips
Keep kids involved and help them succeed.
Financial Planning
Stay on top with our smart financial tips. Browse All About.com About.com is accredited by the Health On the Net Foundation, which promotes reliable and trusted online health information.
Alcoholism
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Home Health Alcoholism Drunk Driving Communitiess Can Reduce Drunk Driving Fatalities
Advertising Info News & Events Work at About SiteMap All Topics Reprints Help User Agreement Ethics Policy Patent Info. Privacy Policy
2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.
ii)
Copy of Power of Attorney from the next of kin of the deceased with Arabic translation (Duly signed and attested by Notary Public). Police Report copy with English translation (for unnatural death only accident, murder, suicide, etc.). Copy of passport and Iqama of the deceased. Copy of Identity card attorney (copy of passport and Iqama) Letter from sponsor to the Embassy regarding legal dues of deceased.
(Time Required : Documents for attestation may be submitted to the CW Wing of the Embassy between 0840 hrs and 1200 hrs on any working day and are generally returned between 1500 hrs and 1600 hrs the same day
(Time Required : Documents for attestation may be submitted to the CW Wing of the Embassy between 0840 hrs and 1200 hrs on any working day and are generally returned between 1500 hrs and 1600 hrs the same day
Top
New Delhi, June 17 (IANS) Over 100,000 people were killed in road accidents in India in 2006 and nearly half a million were injured, according to latest government figures. That means one accident per minute and a fatal one every five minutes. In an effort to control accidents, the government plans to introduce tough amendments to the Motor Vehicles Act in the coming session of parliament. They include suspending the licence of a drunk driver on the spot for up to three months. There were around 460,000 road accidents in the country in 2006, Minister of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways T.R. Baalu said here Tuesday, killing 105,749 people and injuring nearly 500,000. At 2000 prices, the losses due to road accidents were Rs.550 billion (nearly $14 billion) a year, which amounted to three percent of Indias GDP, Baalu told the consultative committee of MPs attached to his ministry. With the amendments to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the penalties for various traffic offences are proposed to be enhanced substantially to make it more deterrent, Baalu said. We have proposed that the authorised enforcement authorities may suspend on the spot the driving licence of a drunken driver for a period up to three months and we are also proposing to introduce civil liabilities of a driver by providing penalty up to Rs.5,000 if one drives a motor vehicle in a rash or negligent manner, causing injury to a person or damage to property. Another amendment proposes to raise the interim compensation to accident victims to Rs.100,000 in case of death or permanent total disablement and to Rs.50,000 in case of permanent partial disablement, the minister said. This shall be paid within three months from the date of filing the application in the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (MACT) or civil court. We are also providing that the MACT or civil court shall try to finally dispose off the claim for compensation within a period of two years from the date of its filing, said Baalu.
The ministry is designing new model inspection and maintenance centres to be set up by state governments for inspection of motor vehicles. The centre will give financial assistance to set them up. The government will also soon approve the Sundar Committees proposal to earmark at least one percent of the money generated from the cess on diesel and petrol for a road safety fund, Baalu said. The committees proposal for creation of an apex body, the National Road Safety & Traffic Management Board, is also being processed at the highest level. The committee to look into the matter of promotion of road safety in educational institutions through Road Safety Clubs has given its report and a scheme costing Rs.1.2 billion during the 11th plan (2007-2012) has been formulated and sent to the Planning Commission for approval.
New Delhi, July 3 (IANS) Four people, including a three-year-old boy, were killed in three accidents in the national capital, the police said Thursday. The boy, Tushar, was crossing road in Madipur area of west Delhi, when a speeding tempo hit him Wednesday evening. He was taken to Sanjay Gandhi Hospital where he was pronounced dead, a police official said. The driver of the vehicle, Ravinder was arrested. The boys father, Azad Kumar works with the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. A 32-year-old man was crushed to death when a truck hit the bike that he was riding. The accident occurred on Najafgarh road. The man was identified as Rajesh Chaurasia, a resident of Mansarovar Garden, a police official said. The victim is survived by his wife and son. The truck driver fled from the spot, the official added. In another accident, two people were killed when hit by a speeding truck in east Delhi area Thursday morning. Yamuna Prasad, 23, and Vir Singh, 19, were riding a motorcycle when the accident took place, a police official said. The driver fled from the spot but left the truck at spot. Both the victims worked for a metal equipment manufacturing company in east Delhi, the police said.
Ghaziabad, May 16 (IANS) Three children died and three others were critically injured Friday evening when a car ran over them in Ghaziabad, the police said. A man, identified as Nawab, was returning from Friday prayers with his three children and his brothers kids when they stopped to take water from a tubewell in Farooque Nagar locality under Loni police station. While they were standing on the roadside, a Tata safari, driven by an allegedly drunk driver ran over them and fell into a ditch. Three children died on the spot, while three others are struggling for their lives in Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital at Delhi, a police official said. The deceased were identified as Rashid, 5, Muskan, 6, and Samad, 5. Circle Officer C.P. Singh said the driver was arrested and two bottles of whisky, empty glasses and bottled water were found in the car.
TUESDAY, July 1 (HealthDay News) -- Tougher laws on underage drinking have reduced the rate of drunk-driving deaths in the United States, a new analysis concludes. The study, funded by the Substance Abuse Policy Research Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, indicates that state laws which make it illegal to possess or purchase alcohol under the age of 21 have led to an 11 percent drop in alcohol-fueled traffic accident deaths among youth. And states with robust fake ID laws on the books have experienced a 7 percent drop in alcoholrelated car fatalities among drivers below the age of 21, the researchers noted. "This study once again showed that the core laws that make it illegal for underage individuals to possess and purchase alcohol had a significant effect on underage drinking and driving fatalities," said study author James C. Fell, senior program director of traffic safety and enforcement programs with the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, based in Calverton, Md.
The findings were expected to be published in the July issue ofAccident Analysis and Prevention. The study authors pointed out that underage drinking legislation and ID rules vary by state. This is despite the fact that since 1988 -- following the passage of a federal law in 1984 that raised the minimum drinking age to 21 -- all states have enforced the two core laws that make it illegal for those under the age of 21 to purchase and possess alcohol. Some states have voluntarily established additional punitive measures to discourage underage drinking. For example, some target stores and/or adults that sell or give alcohol to minors, while others have lowered blood alcohol content (BAC) driving thresholds.
Key rental registration, fake ID screening, minimum server/seller ages, night-time youth driving restrictions, and driving suspensions for underage alcohol violations are some of the other key legal provisions available to states. The current study focused on 16 of the most pertinent underage drinking laws. The authors noted that no single state has embraced all 16 legislative options, although some have gone much further than others in harnessing the law to tackle underage drinking. For example, Fell pointed out that Utah has adopted a decidedly aggressive posture having put in place 15 of the 16 measures. By contrast, Kentucky has passed just six. "I think the timing of this report is very good," added Fell, "because there are several states that are currently considering legislation to actually lower the drinking age back down to 18, either for the military or for all citizens. And this research shows that while the laws we now have cannot totally prevent underage drinking and driving, they are effective and do reduce it." Dr. Karen Sheehan, medical director of injury prevention and research at Children's Memorial Hospital in Chicago, and medical director of the Injury Free Coalition for Kids of Chicago, agreed. "This study confirms that the drinking laws designed to limit alcohol use by drivers less than 21 years [old] has accomplished what these laws were intended to do -- decrease the number of fatal crashes," she said. More information For more about underage drinking, visit the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation. SOURCES: James C. Fell, senior program director, traffic safety and enforcement programs, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Md.; Karen Sheehan, M.D., medical director, Injury Prevention and Research, Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, and medical director, Injury Free Coalition for Kids of Chicago; July 2008,Accident Analysis and Prevention
Gasoline and alcohol dont mix, says the American slogan. Of course they do. Our urban planners mix them all the time and in great doses. See the zoning codes for confirmation. - Ray Olderburg, The Great Good Place As a society we say dont drink and drive but in this case actions speak louder than words. Zoning and land use policies have an impact on the built environment that often promotes driving and limits other transportation options. These regulations to some extent mandate how we get home from work and unfortunately how we get from the tavern, home. Many regulations are involved in this problem but with adjustments to the three below a real reduction in drunk driving can be promoted.
Minimum parking requirements for bars and taverns Zoning that insures separate land uses Zoning that promotes low population density and discourages mass transit
In most communities throughout the U.S. minimum parking requirements exist for various land uses. Unfortunately these minimum parking requirements encourage automobile travel and even extend to taverns. For example, Franklin, Wisconsins Unified Development Ordinance: Zoning, Development and Land Division requirements show, in the table on page 254, the parking requirements for various land uses including bars or taverns.
Other Required Standard(s) Minimum Required Parking Spaces per 1,000 Square Feet for Off-Street Parking Spaces of Floor Area 10 Or 1 space per 2 seats or stools, plus 1 space
Use
Bar or Tavern
Clearly this indicates that a significant number of patrons have the expectation of driving to a bar or tavern and that this is an acceptable practice. Not only does this set the expectation of available parking but it goes a step further and actually encourages people to drive because they know a space will be available. If parking were limited this could encourage other modes of transportation such as walking, mass transit, or cab service to become the preferred method and thus reduce the number of drunk drivers. Many zoning regulations came out of the efforts to separate polluted industrial factories from residential homes but unfortunately this was just the start of separating uses. The separation of uses has spread to the point that now in many communities it is illegal to have a store or a tavern in the neighborhood. Without the corner tavern that is accessible by foot, or by mass transit then people have little choice but to drive. This has added to our long run increase of the number of vehicle miles traveled and although the Alcohol-Related Fatalities and Fatality Rates by State report put out by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration points out that the number of fatalities per vehicle miles driven has dropped we can do more. Alcohol-related traffic fatalities per vehicle miles driven has also dropped dramatically from 1.64 deaths per 100 million miles traveled in 1982 down to 0.56 in 2005 (the latest year for which such statistics are available). Specifically the next step in reducing alcohol-related traffic fatalities is to reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled. This gets to the heart of urbanism, in that walking can be a primary mode of transportation. This would go a long way towards the reduction of the number of drunk drivers by simply taking them of the road. Similiar to the problems created by the separation of land uses, zoning for low density development encourages people to drive by making the distances between home and destination further apart. The report Urban Sprawl and Public Health, put out by the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at the Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, makes the connection between density, the availability of mass transit, and automobile fatality rates. The NHTSA data do permit comparison of automobile fatality rates by city. In general, denser cities with more extensive public transportation systems have lower automobile fatality rates (including drivers and passengers but excluding pedestrians): 2.65 per 100,000 population in New York, 6.98 in Philadelphia, 5.57 in Chicago, 2.54 in San Francisco, and 4.17 in Portland, compared to 9.97 in Houston, 12.55 in Phoenix, 11.53 in Dallas, 10.65 in Tampa, and 11.21 in Atlanta.
Although these numbers attest to all automobile fatality rates the connection between density, access to mass transit, and automobile fatalities is
apparent. By increasing population density and providing a variety of mass transit options people have choices of how to travel to their destination of choice. Further by having a higher population density this generally supports the availability of entertainment options nearby and again allows for people to make better transportation choices when drinking. Ive touched on just a few of the zoning regulations that promote drunk driving and alluded to the solution. The solution I propose can be called Smart Growth, New Urbanism, Urbanism or just plain old city living but all of these refer to one essential idea. The idea of creating neighborhoods where you can live, work, and play. Essentially we need to get people out of their cars before they get to the tavern. To be clear Im not arguing that city living will be the end of drunk driving. But when we legislate that you drive to the bar and when we build the physical environment so that people are encouraged to drive to the tavern, then the end result will be drunk drivers. So if we want to change this outcome and combat drunk drivingA Better Approach to Reduce Drunk Driving
Aug 23rd, 2008 | By Dave Reid | Category: Government, Neighborhoods
Gasoline and alcohol dont mix, says the American slogan. Of course they do. Our urban planners mix them all the time and in great doses. See the zoning codes for confirmation. - Ray Olderburg, The Great Good Place As a society we say dont drink and drive but in this case actions speak louder than words. Zoning and land use policies have an impact on the built environment that often promotes driving and limits other transportation options. These regulations to some extent mandate how we get home from work and unfortunately how we get from the tavern, home. Many regulations are involved in this problem but with adjustments to the three below a real reduction in drunk driving can be promoted.
Minimum parking requirements for bars and taverns Zoning that insures separate land uses Zoning that promotes low population density and discourages mass transit
In most communities throughout the U.S. minimum parking requirements exist for various land uses. Unfortunately these minimum parking requirements encourage automobile travel and even extend to taverns. For example, Franklin, Wisconsins Unified Development Ordinance: Zoning, Development and Land Division requirements show, in the table on page 254, the parking requirements for various land uses including bars or taverns.
Other Required Standard(s) Minimum Required Parking Spaces per 1,000 Square Feet for Off-Street Parking Spaces of Floor Area
Use
Bar or Tavern
10
Or 1 space per 2 seats or stools, plus 1 space per employee, whichever is greater
Clearly this indicates that a significant number of patrons have the expectation of driving to a bar or tavern and that this is an acceptable practice. Not only does this set the expectation of available parking but it goes a step further and actually encourages people to drive because they know a space will be available. If parking were limited this could encourage other modes of transportation such as walking, mass transit, or cab service to become the preferred method and thus reduce the number of drunk drivers. Many zoning regulations came out of the efforts to separate polluted industrial factories from residential homes but unfortunately this was just the start of separating uses. The separation of uses has spread to the point that now in many communities it is illegal to have a store or a tavern in the neighborhood. Without the corner tavern that is accessible by foot, or by mass transit then people have little choice but to drive. This has added to our long run increase of the number of vehicle miles traveled and although the Alcohol-Related Fatalities and Fatality Rates by State report put out by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration points out that the number of fatalities per vehicle miles driven has dropped we can do more. Alcohol-related traffic fatalities per vehicle miles driven has also dropped dramatically from 1.64 deaths per 100 million miles traveled in 1982 down to 0.56 in 2005 (the latest year for which such statistics are available). Specifically the next step in reducing alcohol-related traffic fatalities is to reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled. This gets to the heart of urbanism, in that walking can be a primary mode of transportation. This would go a long way towards the reduction of the number of drunk drivers by simply taking them of the road. Similiar to the problems created by the separation of land uses, zoning for low density development encourages people to drive by making the distances between home and destination further apart. The report Urban Sprawl and Public Health, put out by the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at the Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, makes the connection between density, the availability of mass transit, and automobile fatality rates. The NHTSA data do permit comparison of automobile fatality rates by city. In general, denser cities with more extensive public transportation systems have lower automobile fatality rates (including drivers and passengers but excluding pedestrians): 2.65 per 100,000 population in New York, 6.98 in Philadelphia, 5.57 in Chicago, 2.54 in San Francisco, and 4.17 in Portland, compared to 9.97 in Houston, 12.55 in Phoenix, 11.53 in Dallas, 10.65 in Tampa, and 11.21 in Atlanta.
Although these numbers attest to all automobile fatality rates the connection between density, access to mass transit, and automobile fatalities is apparent. By increasing population density and providing a variety of mass transit options people have choices of how to travel to their destination of choice. Further by having a higher population density this generally supports the availability of entertainment options nearby and again allows for people to make better transportation choices when drinking. Ive touched on just a few of the zoning regulations that promote drunk driving and alluded to the solution. The solution I propose can be called Smart Growth, New Urbanism, Urbanism or just plain old city living but all of these refer to one essential idea. The idea of creating neighborhoods where you can live, work, and play. Essentially we need to get people out of their cars before they get to the tavern. To be clear Im not arguing that city living will be the end of drunk driving. But when we legislate that you drive to the bar and when we build the physical environment so that people are encouraged to drive to the tavern, then the end result will be drunk drivers. So if we want to change this outcome and combat drunk driving we need to begin by changing our regulations to encourage dense, walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods.