Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
= + (5)
where V
S
is the voltage on the sensor and V
-
is the voltage at
the inverting input. Moreover, in order to simplify the final
equation, a parameter that relates two fixed resistors of the
circuit is introduced. This parameter K is given by:
3 2
3
R R
K
R
+
=
(6)
From equations (3-6) it is possible to obtain an expression
of the output voltage of the operational amplifier:
( )( )
n S
O S f S A OS
dT AK
V R S a b T T mc V
A K dt
| |
| |
= + + + |
|
|
+
\
\
(7)
It is possible to simplify (7) considering the gain, A, much
greater than the parameter K. Furthermore, if the offset voltage,
V
OS
, is small and can be disregarded, the simplified expression
for reconstruction the fluid velocity can be found as:
1
2
( )
n
O
f
S S A
V
a K
bSR T T b
| |
| |
|
|
\
|
=
|
|
\
(8)
The WB-CTA architecture was simulated using Matlab and
Simulink, using the parameters shown in Table 1.
TABLE I. PARAMETERS OF WB-CTA ARCHITECTURE
Parameters Values
A 100.000
VOS 1 mV
R1 500
K 3.5
Fig. 4 shows the behavior of the temperature sensor, in
steady state, as a function of the fluid velocity. It can be seen
that this architecture presents a small variation in temperature
with increasing the fluid velocity.
Fig. 4. Temperature sensor as a function of fluid velocity.
Fig. 5 and 6 show the dynamic behavior of the output
voltage, for two values of offset voltage 1 mV and 10 mV,
respectively, considering a step variation on the fluid velocity,
from 0 to 25 m/s, applied at time instant zero. It is possible to
observe that the value of the operational amplifier input offset
voltage influences the system behavior and performance
strongly.
Fig. 5. WB-CTA output voltage as function of time for an step variation of
the fluid velocity, with VOS = 1 mV.
Fig. 6. WB-CTA output voltage as function of time for an step variation of
the fluid velocity, with VOS = 10 mV.
The fluid velocity was estimated from (8) and it is shown in
Fig. 7, for the operational amplifier input offset voltage of 1
mV and for the same fluid velocity step. The settling time
(using 2% criterion) obtained for this case was 42.73 ms and
the percent overshoot 659.51%.
Fig. 7. Reconstruction of fluid velocity in WB-CTA architecture.
The proposed architecture aims to avoid these unwanted
behaviors and obtain a better performance for estimating the
fluid velocity.
IV. FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION
Equation (3) presented in section II shows that the
relationship between the electric current and the temperature of
the NTC sensor is nonlinear. On the other hand, the
relationship between the electrical power and the temperature
is linear. To make it possible to employ electrical power as the
controlling variable, the architecture presented in Fig. 8 is
considered.
Fig. 8. Feedback linearization configuration of the system with electrical
power as input.
Applying the Laplace transform in (3) the transfer function
can be written as:
1
( )
( ) 1
th
e
G T s
P s s
=
+
(9)
where
( ) ( )
S a
T s T s T
=
, is the time constant which is given
by
th
th
C
G
, C
th
and G
th
are the thermal capacitance and the thermal
conductance, respectively. The thermal capacitance is
calculated by the product mc and thermal conductance by the
product hS.
This configuration makes linear the relationship between
the input and output signal of the sensor system, which makes
it possible to apply conventional control techniques in order to
improve system performance.
V. PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE
The proposed architecture is shown in Fig. 9. For the sensor
to operate at a heated temperature, the input signal is a
reference temperature. A comparison between reference and
sensor temperatures is made producing an error signal, which is
the input of the controller. The controller generates a power
signal output that is converted to a current signal by voltage
feedback, making complete feedback control system linear.
Fig. 9. Proposed architecture.
In order simulate the proposed architecture, the parameters
of a commercial sensor were used, and are shown in Table 2.
TABLE II. PARAMETERS OF COMMERCIAL SENSORS
Parameters Values
Rinf 0.0265
B 3068 K
Cth 7 J/K
Gth 4.28410
-4
W/K
a 2375 W/m.K
b 976 W.s
0.5
/m
2.5
.K
n 0.5
For the design of the controller, the requirements of
simplicity, zero steady-state error and low system response
time were considered. Thus, a comparison between
proportional (P) and proportional-integral (PI) controllers is
carried out to verify their adequacy to these requirements. The
transfer function of P controller is given by:
( )
P th P
C s G K =
(10)
The transfer function of the PI controller can be written as:
( )
I
PI th P
K
C s G K
s
| |
= +
|
\
(11)
The transfer function in open loop is given by:
( )
2
1
P I
P
P I
K K
s
K
G s
K K
s s
| |
+
|
\
=
+ | |
+ +
|
\
(12)
where
1
2
P
n
K
+ | |
=
|
\
and
2
I
n
K
=
. The damping
coefficient and natural frequency
n
were chosen to achieve a
system time response of 5 ms, with 2% criterion. In Table 3
these values and gains of P and PI controller are presented.
TABLE III. PARAMETERS OF CONTROLLER AND SPECIFICATIONS CHOSEN
Parameters Values
1
800
25.08
10432
Similar to what was developed for the WB-CTA
architecture is necessary to obtain an expression that estimates
the behavior of the fluid velocity to the proposed architecture.
Through equation (3), the fluid velocity is given by:
1
n
e
S A
f
P
a
T T
b
(
(
(
(
(
| |
\
(
=
(13)
To simulate the proposed architecture, the reference
temperature of 100 C was considered. The fluid velocity step
of 0 m/s to 25 m/s was applied at time instant zero. Fig. 10 and
11 shows the power signal at the controller output and current
signal at the input of the sensor, respectively, for both
controllers.
Fig. 10. Power signal generated.
Fig. 11. Input current signal of the sensor .
Figure 12 shows the behavior of output temperature of the
sensor for both controllers. The PI controller presents a zero
steady-state error when the fluid velocity step is applied. The
system response time, to reach 2% of the final value, was
found about 2.46 ms as expected.
Fig. 12. Temperature response for both controllers.
From equation (14) it was possible to estimate the fluid
velocity. In Figure 13 it is possible to observe this behavior, in
which is again applied a step of 25 m/s. The settling time and
the percent overshoot obtained were 7.95 ms and 28.71%
respectively.
Fig. 13. Reconstruction of fluid velocity in proposed architecture.
VI. CONCLUSION
This paper presented an architecture of a controlled-
temperature hot-wire anemometer using thermoresistive
sensors that performs a linearization of the transfer function
through a feedback output voltage. Furthermore, a control
system was designed for the architecture to ensure that steady-
state error is zero and low system response time. The proposed
architecture was compared to the classical Wheatstone Bridge
Constant Temperature Anemometer (WB-CTA).
Through simulations, it was possible to verify that the WB-
CTA architecture has a rapid response but cannot keep the
temperature constant as noted. Moreover, it was also found that
it performance, in terms of response to a fast measurand
variation, is strongly influenced by the operational amplifier
input offset voltage.
The proposed architecture has shown it can maintain a
constant temperature in the sensor due to use of a PI controller
and it has a better response performance for a rapid variation of
the fluid velocity when compared to the classical architecture.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank the Federal University of
Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), CAPES e CNPq for the
financial support and all colleagues for the technical support.
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
0
20
40
60
80
Time (s)
P
o
w
e
r
(
m
W
)
P controller
PI controller
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
10
15
20
25
Time (s)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
m
A
)
P controller
PI controller
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
94
96
98
100
102
104
Time (s)
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
P controller
PI controller
Reference
REFERENCES
[1] M. A. Moreira, A. Oliveira, C. E. T. Drea, P. R. Barros and J. S. R.
Neto, Sensors characterization and control of measurement systems
with thermoresistive sensors using feedback linearization,
Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings,
pp. 2003-2008, May 2008.
[2] R. C. S. Freire, S. Y. C. Catunda and B. A. Luciano, Applications of
thermoresistive sensors using the electric equivalence principle, IEEE
Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 58, no. 6, pp.
1823-1830, Jun 2009.
[3] G. R. Sarma, Analysis of a constant voltage anemometer circuit,
Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, pp. 731-736,
May 1993.
[4] R. P. C. Ferreira and R. C. S. Freire, Hot-wire anemometer with
temperature compensation using only one sensor, IEEE Transactions on
Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 954-958, Aug
2001.
[5] S. V. Leal, S. Y. C. Catunda, L. A. S. Ribeiro, and R. C. S. Freire,
Automatic dynamic range adjustment of a controlled-temperature
thermoresistive-based anemometer, Instrumentation and Measurement
Technology Conference, pp. 268-272, May 2010.
[6] G. A. L. Araujo, R. C. S. Freire, J. F. da Silva, S. Y. C. Catunda and G.
Fontgalland, DC-Amplifier-Input-Offset-Voltage Control in a
Constant-Temperature Thermoresistive-Sensor-Measurement
Instrument, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,
vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 778-783, Jun 2007.
[7] G. K. K. Reddy, S. V. Reddy, T. K. Ramkumar, Development of Hall
sensor propeller anemometer for measuring wind speed using embedded
controller, International Conference on Communications, Devices and
Inteligent Systems, pp. 484-487, Dec 2012.
[8] H. Aboushady, F. F. Santos, A. Oliveira, G. M. Freitas, L. S. Palma, S.
Y. C. Catunda, R. C. S. Freire and W. R. M. Almeida, A constant
temperature thermoresistive sigma-delta anemometer, Instrumentation
and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings, pp. 1-6, May
2007.
[9] G. A. L. Araujo, R. C. S. Freire, J. F. da Silva, S. Y. C. Catunda and G.
Fontgalland, Dependence of a thermoresistive sensor-based constant
temperature measurement instrument response on DC amplifier input
offset voltage, Instrumentation and Measurement Technology
Conference, vol. 2, pp. 1561-1565, May 2005.
[10] S. Y. C. Catunda, M. V. Gabriel, F. R. Sousa, R. C. S. Freire and J. V. F.
Neto, Sensitivity evaluation of thermoresistive sensor constant
temperature anemometers, Instrumentation and Measurement
Technology Conference, vol. 2, pp. 1048-1052, May 2004.
[11] G. S. Deep, R. C. S. Freire, P. C. Lobo, J. S. R. Neto and A. M. N. Lima,
Dynamic response of thermoresistive sensors, IEEE Transactions on
Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 815-819, Dec
1992.
[12] V. S. G. Martins, R. C. S. Freire and S. Y. C. Catunda, Sensitivity
analysis and automatic adjustment of a controlled-temperature
thermoresistive-based anemometer, Instrumentation and Measurement
Technology Conference, pp. 1876-1880, May 2012.