& R. I.

Series ALAMKARA MAKARANDAH By

A. P. G.

O. M.

L.

17
Rajasekhara Sudhi

&. a.

001

A.P.G. O.M.L

&

R.

I.

Series

ALAMKARA MAKARANDAH
by Rajasekhara Sudhi Edited and commentated by Sriman Maringanti Srirangacharya

First Edition

No. of copies

March 1985 200

Price

Rs,

33

A,P, Govt. Oriental manuscripts

Library

Research Institute,

Abids, Hyderabad 500 001

Title designed

by

B. K. Chary

Printed at

MASTER ART PRINTER^

1-1 -694/2; A, Gandhinagar;

Hyderabad 500 3SO

PREFACE

Dr. V. V. L.

Narasimha Rao

*)Q 8

0"*

O3QD*OS*OS

lUU
101 108
10o
^

11

"Ssi*eDoS*tf8

83
4

*5^<&ti

sStf'o^oos'tfs

6 wcr*ot$&<d*??j" oosm tfg a

35

ojQ*<?(3j*s*

uo5*^s

110

88
j6E9*iSj'OoS'C^I

O'gaa&tigOoS*^'*
^3Sj
t

111

44

^ Oo3*^a
T>

H3

(Jj*o8stfeo5*tf

61

D^sS^cos'Cfs
5

121

52

S'S^J

^'

(poos'C'g

122
123

6S

e$fSori#?t)o9*tfs
iJS.sSrooa'C's
cvoJCP^O 1^08
**C

67
TT
I I

124
1

nv >^ *fe *^

*<&D

^9 fi

82
82

DO^oos'^g
W(3'*gp'?<9os'tf8

127

328
128

86

o)'s^c*^os*^^

89
91

5*tfeaSSje e7^oos'6^8

>StfOo5"tf8

11 12
183
134
185

98

s^tp&^oos'dt
^*D*coSP6's
S*S55>07TC>O5*^8

95
96
99

%&lc

)Jf

<=oostf 8

137

149 139
141

1^0
151

148

155 155

146

157

147

US

J6S

16 S
11

167
168

1)1

Dr. V. V.
Director,

Narasimha Rao, M.A., Ph.D., Andhra Pradesh Government Oriental

L.

Manuscripts Library

&

Research Institute, Hyderabad.

PREFACE
Keeping
in

view the cultural heritage of aur country,

the-

Government of Andhra Pradesh took up for consideration the programme of publication of manuscripts on a variety of subjects such as Holy Scriptures, literary works in poetry, prose, grammar,
prosody and poetics,
etc.

The department ot the Andhra Pradesh Government Oriental Manuscripts Library and Research Institute has so far brought out
sixteen publications, in addition to a Research Journal entitled Vijnana Saraswati. In the publication series of the department one

'Vaikrta Chandrika', a Sanskrit work on Telugu Grammar by Manchella Vasudevakavi of 1750 A.D, was brought out in 1975 with an exhaustive and critical introduction by Dr. Vadlamudi Gopalakrishnaiah, the then director of the department* Later, in the year 1982, another work in Telugu oh grammar, prosody and Kavi Chintamani by Vellanki Tatambhattu poetics entitled (around 1500 A.D.) was published.
c
9

The present work 'Alamkara Makarandah', a treatise in Sanskrit on the figures of poetry, composed by Rajasekhara of 18th century comes under the category of poetics. For the benefit of Telugu readers, the work is printed in the Telugu characters with a
detailed

commentary

in

Telugu by Sriman Maringanti

Sri

Ranga-

charya, a scholar of repute.

The Manuscript
The manuscript utilized in preparing this edition came from Government Oriental Manuscripts Library, Madras (G.Q.MX.

the

No. 2285).

It is a copy, made by a scribe from the original, in almost a fairly legible and bold Nagari characters. It contains 31 folios with 20 lines on each folio, written on both sides. The size of the folio is 26 cm x 24 cm. At the end of the manuscript i.e. on the first side of the last folio, it was recorded that the copy was

"transcribed from the manuscripts of ,Sikka Pullayya of Visweswara Agraharam, Perur shivar, Amalapuram Taluk, Godawari
district in 1916-17."

Gam

This transcript deposited in the Andhra Pradesh Government Oriental Manuscripts Library and Research Institute with Ace. No, 131 and another copy prepared by Sri D. K. Srinivasacharya, Sanskrit pandit of this department are the scripts utilized
for preparation of the press
: .

copy in Telugu characters.

'*
i
i
'

i
,

,,,!

Alamkara Sastra. The very title of work - "Alamk'ara 'Makarandah" - means the nectar of* figures. The characterstics of Alamkaras are explained with co
The work
'

relates to

c
-

illustrations.

Although the poet Rajasekhara at the outset^ oclaims that he would follow the footsteps of Chan^ralbka, confines his text (Alankara Makarandah) only to 63 Alankar s
whereas Chandraloka extends its scope to 100 Arthalamkaras althou h Alankara Makarandah also avoids t e it avoids Sabdalamkaras. the two is only to this extent, it between the same and anology the text of Alamkara Makarandah, of the in middle appears that
almost two folios are missing. The scribe makes a note of this.* The missing portion of the text might have contained two more alamkaras. Even if this part is restored, the total number of Alamkaras may not exceed 65.
This
is all

the anotomy of the text,

The Author, His place and Date

Rajasekhara, the author Rajasekhara, the author of the
tenth century.

of this

work is not yayavariya famous work Kivyamimamsa of

'

The last sloka of Alamkara Makarandah reveal* that the author of the work is Rajasekhara 'btirn in the genealogy of
1

page 82

vi

Except in this one reference, nowhere it is me Itioned of this work is RajaseKara, Neither th n me of bis gotra nor the names of his parents are found in this or But it is evident that this Rajasekara is also the author o 'Sahitya kalpadruma' an incomplete but fairly a sizable work on poetics. From the colophons 2 of this work it is learnt that he vas born to a noble couple of Brahmins - namely Venkateswara and Sogemamba - belonging to Goutama gotra. His teacher was none
'Kolluri'
1 .

that the author

else than his

It

own

father 3 ,

out of place if I give here the relevant extracts from 'the History of Sanskrit Classical Literature' by

may not be

JVtr.

M. Krishnama
"Rajasekara

Chariar.

Kolluru family and of Goutama gotra lived in Peruru (Somanathapura on the banks of the river Kousiki on the Godavari Konasima about 1840 A. D. His
son

of Venktesa of

Sahitya Kalpadruma wrote Siva Sataka,

on poetics in 81 Stabakas, He also Sris.achampu and Alankara Matcaranda" P Banarsidass Ill Edn. [Motilai 787] 1974,
is

work

In 'the New Cataloguscatalogorum, An Alphabetical Register of Sanskrit and allied works and Authors' Dr. V. Raghavan writes
:

Alamkara Makaranda by Kolluri Rajasekhara of Peruru in Andhra, of a family of Dravidas. The work of Chamatkara Chandrika praises a chief called Rameswara of Anipindi Vamsa, of Mukteswara son of Visweswara described as Ammanna Mahimahendra" [Vol I, Rev. Edn, 1969, U. O. M. P. 400]
1.
'

cc

&

'

page 165. A.M.

First

stabaka, S.K.D

Second stabaka' S.K.D

_
i

3.

"^&

iir

(|)

3oS"fiy*

^& vii

S.K.D

near Godavari, of Anpindi family.

Brahmana of Mvrkteswara Real name Rameswara, son of Visweswara and Kamakshi, a patron of Kolluri Rajasekhara (Author of Alankara Makaranda MT 2285) "[Ibid P. 386]
-

"Ammanna Mahimahendra

Under Ammanna MT2285,

been patronized also by pishwa [Ibid P. 400]

Rajasekhara

is

said
-

Madhava Rao

1760

to have 1772 A. D.

The patronization of pishwa Madhava Rao has yet to be corroborated with and confirmed by further historical evidenceThere arc no internal evidences to this effect, in any of the
available works of Rajasekhara.

However, scholars like Malladi Suryanarayana Sastri, the author of 'Lives of Sanskrit poets' believe that this is a fact and the poet Rajasekhara may therefore belong to later half of the 18th
century.

But placing the poet at a later date in 19th century around 1840 A.D., as Mr. Kmhaamaehariar did, may not be correct since most of the Kolluri families* now available have almost forgotten the poet and are not in a position to furnish us any information shout him. la such a brief span of one century, I believe, a poet of repute may not be so easily forgotten by the descendant
l

families.

From the available information, we may now conclude that Rajasekhara belongs to the third quarter of the 18th century.
Hts

works

llic following are the works of Rajasekhara as agreed upon, by the historians of Sanskrit Literature:
1.

Sua
Sriba.

Sataka

4.

Sahitya

Kalpadruma

Champu
Champu
5.

and

3.

Bhagivata
first three

Alamkara Makaranda

The

^ me under

come under poetry, while the remaining two

poetics.

viii

'
'

and A.M. deal with the Su shmala ara was dealt in Wti "tmake Iso. with, Prataparudriya eyidsijtly special jnention of 'Sukshmalamkara' is tiat * is Alam* ara is oiif^ among Ae few which demarcate the two cul "of poetic figure^'Here |t may be necessary to trace out the two main-pults, particul^
arly^of the poetic figures.
,

.*

:p

^~

the two main

cults
.

ft'

<
,

c-

"poetic' 6g(tfes'alonel"< jneans. the ^en ire science of poetics a d ,rhe o ics. But at stag , tte Art a (sense) and Sab^a (s mutt' la aras alone '* deal wth, nder the caption C A1 ar Sa L \ Books
'

Alamkara Sastra does not mean

Cha draoka and Kuvalayanan^a

with
la
i

e
t

wri ten'
the

karas. This reveals the fact th

Mng gfelai
!

lamkari school e

much

authbr

on poetry and poetic tkeorics. " maha, fKavyalamkara is considered to be the fi Exponent o> thissch ol and after 5m came Udbhata a d. Rti ata. Evexi Dandi, an adherent of una-riti school devote considerable spac
"uence
in his

t c reahn of pbeticsi become indispensable an'<i thus came out hoja's Srngaraprakasa, Hemachandra's KavyanuKesava isra's Alamkara sasana, Sekhara while Mammata^ Kavyaprakasa and Viswanatha's sahityadarpana and Visvesvara'sAlamkara Kaustubha elaborately dealt with the alamkaras.

work

for the treat

f

ent of alamkaras. In

the

treatment

alamkaras

had

The adherents of
its

this school

own body of sound and

sense,

ft

ment.

beleive that since poetry has requires the necessity adorn-

The two extremeties of adornment are the Atisayokti and? the former T>eing plenty in a ornment and the latter being scanty in, it." Whether the adorn ent is plenty or starttt, it should iad'tftautjr to the soul of poet.' which in ither
the svabhavokti,
is

words,

the Rasa.

This
is

theory
fall

Aaanda
Hence
all

upheld

by the'

Vardhana

nvanyaloka

-1

6r

the

%al word

in_^

field

alamkaras should

of poetics.

in line with the rasa theory."

Whatever be the ultimate goal , been devided into two, the one being the Kashmiriar* school and the rest feeing the other school.Hie fofmet school was no doubt responsible for the developrojrt of poetics. The trend and direction of this school established, by Bhamaha, Vagbhata Ruyyaka and others arc different from that of
to have

prs

the o^her school

established by Dandi,Vamana, Bhoja and ot of the non-kashmirian school is thatjthey ad

ers.
it

One salient-; feature some alamkaras lifce

'

Hetu, Lesa and Sukshma, whereas the avoids these three'alankaras*.

,

Ka

nmirian sch'dqr.totally

Sukshmalamkara, one amongst this group was acpep^cl h Vjdyanatha and evidently Kolluri Rajasethira mcluded^it^ Soi his works, S.K.D. and A.M. It is quite natural that this^o^t
Indian Rhetorician follows instead of a cult established elsewhere.

the cult established in these, part',

testimony to the fact of poetic figures. school to the Southern belongs Rajasekhara ...

The

Sukshmalamkara bears
.

thtft

The Sanskrit original and the Telugu, Commentary

Rajasekhara's method of composing the text follows the regular norms of definition and brief explanation with one or two
;

explanatory part is in prose, tl^ remaining 'Karika' defines the part runs into metrical form. As the opening 5 it. The illustrations Alamkara, the 'Laghu Vrtti briefly explains have all the poetic charm in describing 'Sri Ramesa', the patron of the work and serve the purpose of providing /Lakshya to the In most cases the author employs two stykas fo the 'Lakshana of the example to the d^fini ion given at .the o tset full
illustrations.

While

the.

application

of each Alamkara. This is the format an extent of the ori nal work. The place of Rajasekhara,, in 1 e realm of Sans fit rhetoricians may not ,be fixed, on par with that of Vidyanath of
Dharrnasuri.

(As the Telugu commentator rightly points out> Rajasekhara does occasionally follow DharmasUri, as iia the case of Anukalpala kara which is a glaring example?). B^ he .has his own Umitecl pi ce and makes hjs own modest contribution to t e His achieve ent as a scholar-poet can t oetics. rich legacy of be underestimated. Thedepth of his eling and,,thp heigh,t of is
the felicity ith wh^i.chhp seldom employs alliterative sounds to the exaggerated sense are worth mentioning, sloka No. 9, P,6 and Sloka No. 233 P, 163 etc.)

imagination and above

all,

(viz.

The Telu u commentator, Srirangacharya h?is his own device of rovidingco mentary to the original, of course,.as ppir the request an specificatio s" of thjis department. For the definition and brief
ex lanation, he

normally gives a translation

in lucid

Telugu.

Fpr

*See Narayana Daso Banhatti's Sangraha (B,O.RJ. 1982) P. XIX

Xl

Introduction to Kavyalankara

the Illtrstration part fie provides 'word to word meaning with a brief synopsis of the sloka, together with an explanatory note or comment. Where he finds a genuine spark in the original, he gives a dptaiP ed gloss. But when he observes that the illustration does not suit the definition he never hesitates to point it owt and supply the omission by providing a popular example from a former rhetorician* In the following slokas, the Telugo commentator does not
9

'

find

an apt

illustration.

In slokas

bearing
T

for

the subdivisions of <Utpreksha ; 'Akshepa' ; in 191 for *Vakrokti% in 199 for Tadguna; if* 220 for 'Rasavadadi, in 222 for 'Preyas' and so on. Scholars may carefully examiae the context. Shortcomings, if any, on the part of the author are not spared by the Telugu tommeatator y Sr i M. S,

numbers 84,85 and 87 in sloka No. 144 for

Acharya.
Sri Acharya's Telngu is finest and easy going. He is a sweettongued scholar blessed with the gift of gab. In his oomHacntary be mainly follows the Granthika form of Telugo and yet exMbits a sudden inclination to switch over to the Vyavakarika, probaMy, to bring home the native felicity of expression.* Bis Providing a Telugu commentary to Alamkara Makarala& doubt, successful and deserve commendation?. The work would,

therefore be a very useful manual, particularly to the modern student of Alamkara Sastra, besides its quality of enriching the lore of Sanskrit poetics.

The work is now in the hands of the them to appreciate the merits, if any.

scholars.

It is

upto

The Department of Andhra Pradesh Government Oriental

Manuscripts Library and Research Institute has taken all possible to bring out an immaculate edition of the Text. Sri. D. K. Srinivasachary, Sri K. V. Rama Sastry, Smt. Y. Vatsala, Smt. V. Saralakumari and Sri B. Sanjeeva Reddy have respectively taken pains to correct the proofs and do the needful while the printing work was in progress. I wish them all success.
care
I owe my humble thanks to the Government of Andhra Pradesh for their kind help in developing this department and thereby preserving and promoting the cultural heritage of our

country.

March

1985.

(Sd) V.V.L.
Xii

Narasimha Rao.

sjg

r-o^otftf

3 Con- A
fot

eia

o&J

Sfg, tftcJ^ ^c^SSb

SoS^S) C&QO&&. SoiS^tf

o CD

a, "I

SacfdHo

239

^fio

166V

1680-1700

a'$rri;S

617. 1850

287-

sS)do

'164

a
1760-72 LS.

s-a

18

16

25

*>)

2.

5. 1453,

2,

tf

0*^61

Xti

148-U3

[2U-149

005*5^00^

ASS&cfo&n-

48

SCcS&^fl.

LS

cr

s-s^oos-tf
fi

165)

sfa

"Sorfb

"Soefc

32

56

^&

62-

00

JtdS

ts&tfj5fc>

80

CO

*O

Atf
CSbfibn-tf.

&

U.4

"4

3*4.

JO

GO

fldfr

n 218-Sik 151

!!

32

&~ 32

tfo.tf

^t-8

Sbr*^

238

^-1

'cSSbo'

SRi'SS

O3

Sb^tf tf

tftf rfff*

j.

a.

"I.

(So)

Otf

C)

S5
o

s5

S756

ScC

cJSbg

tf^
CJ

rfe

Ao

35"

ioiiolc

2.

i i

atf^d
i

eatf^otStfc^a
dip^e^oOfcis-^oS

^^PS-

53

&tfo?D c&3&
3ooe3?5S$i>r^rt'a

^57"

SSao'Sp'i

c3

?6sS^o^i

nSS

cS^otSeSS

foSbs-^)^

sSs

>

tf

^i^b.

sj<S

.i

<S8-[S5R)

efrb

,^;Sc gco

81

c-

SSx

:} oL

ST-S *_

&dciS)8~frsS> 3!6

J^_

Atfs

i.

&S tfotf 8

oS$~i

^583^)2

g^fSbii

tf

sio:

^53

u rfefiofc

w ^-

2.
8.
2)g3efc

53Sbj-o

5*6 efl-?

1!>oS$

Sfi

sS5s5S,

<S

18

cifiS*

- 3"%*
i

i3

Js
i

co

.-

a*

S 8

8*

tf

II

IS

"I

o"

o^3^) ^a
&<&>

*S&

S^ofibA.

rf.

rt

0d

2
.

SSj*^)^^
4
8

*fe

^5^^S$roo^^^a.
^rg^isSjtioos-tfSa.

BSgrf0.fl

15

o-

ew 333

,3

* &<j ffiS3

t,

rsa^a

^3
4

^araa,,

Sr

o-^fi^^ ***,<&&

|5

ssbo^o&s Saa

r^a d&s

s$dby&.

o^oos'^^a

D'oo5 ^ <ixeD^
t
"

cNia&

IS

tkoe

"ia

>o

fc,

tfrf

fe

A*aS) d3
i

fifs

i-

v.

-rftf

ir4 w

ts

^v. 8
Sr

sSbotfc

S6^ir

Qo3^cS>gJ^o

cS^e^JSs

t<

;fo

wo &*>
i

.oo^^?
S
1

^&
L

^8

Bog_^gadio
'

&o2fo^

fc

0*

tf

Soe?

20

4Sa>

tf

&
.

eoflba

..

tf

&,:

_
5
.

^
'

0(r

^.
3 _

^_ ^^ ^l_
, |

^^

21

fctf&o&Sb.

eiD

tfS"

20

<S>

C3

"5

sja

-w

ia

22
Sia

23

ie

SD^D fitfec

exc3-^5ot5a)(SjSD.

"IsS

"SgSS

22

a<jS[s

^jdb^eo
t

C&CP,

tfg

CO

63

iS

23

tf

:S

ejtf

tf

28

ijSSflo&

S^ - la^tf

SSa

JM -

25

cO^WO

Uia^prJ
i
i

ffiStf

35*?o
l>

27

26

S a

OD

So

28

(J)

27

tf

Sba

:8

*&f&

28

Ooo
fioo

BOSS

tc

29
<J>

Bon

'

31

^0^8 -io^fia

31

ssp-

32

82

it

S$L*

a-SS

83

33

SboSf j.

o*

tf

^^

a^va\8ii

35

ea

o-tf/SS

ea

fiao

J3*

^o

tftfo

^tfB5oo8-tfsS.

86

tfoidi

?53tfd6

atpoeft
fi>e

e^

T*ofic>

rfcS^fc

40

87

38

S)

^^^083^)083

&&00

^TV^gS:

to

41

^o

tf^a-tf&oco tfo

39

42

tfa-

sis

tfoj

AS>

-o-if ^^

^r>

jjsjff

^S-fl, _ Jb

tf

,..

45

SSi

^*di>^?5c
a'Sto

^Cbtf^So

5jS5eao

SiiJ'tf'^s

^^)8
oS

^DfiSpa*

tStfoSSOtftf^S.

A^dSs-^i

^e:

^oo<5^

Sl

^^^^"^sS^^^^^

CD

42

I)

tf

Tg&a.

&

vSoo

43

Q "fe

tfo

I s

"i

ere*
P

47

-n

^>

tf

oS

(*)

44

r?

otf s*cr?s -

&&>&>

tf

ea ^x>

Sto 3d).
'

11

'jSC

dSOcl 3*

DsJVf&o

^daoS. w^o i^'

(

'L

48

45

#053"

^^

fiStf^St

ddb3eia

S)

tf

63 iSca

40

S3

ar*t5?6

?So&o3

^^30

fSo^cSlitStoSa

*;&&

33^

I)

tf

AO

xo
*4

^c"^
o

\*&c?\i

51

c^
*osS\ Cs

erg

a'a^

i^a^

Soc?otf

^o^'SS

sS

*
I

^^005*^8 -

So3^*005*tf&D

8^3CxS)"i

JptJQoO^I

Ow

>

&?

83^ - liio^^^O^

3^8

- M&O^tf

S&^o-

cdb^

AS^a.

wtffia

5
5 &<S5bo
ei

5
8i>e}13
t

ti

cplWDMjSafcsii

<SO^Sfl

sio|_&a*

J5

5 -w
^^i! SS 35
i

S^tf'^SaS.wc&o

JSotf

rf&

'

^oc-^s So -sTo}

^Jfcgj-

5a>

M
-a..

-os

jcs>a;tt;s ^
So

33

mW> ila-oto - jrajs>&

2)

tf

es

-3*

^ ^ ***

difc

c&o

&c&o 3
54

cJ

So
j

c53j&S
i

tf^o

J)

qrfSni.

SoVfcea

o^

sid

&

tf

is

52

e^

SoO

Si

tf

tf

ea

S^bo

58

33*1"

ea

J.

3.

1.

es>

&8>

tfo

"*

58

tf

a1
62

2.

57

tf

ea

&a

8)3

0^:5630

58

es

&)

A^cfib

^0-^69^^ w^tf

i^d^O

0&c&

etf&a

4.

2.
4.

&$

^)^

^sssca'S^s

3.

w,

ssa
,

BO&

59

5?:$

^
^s_i
^55-0
|

Si

0*0 eo^SaSS).

60

65

ufir*^

itf

ca

57838

tf

3cfo6o&o&

S5

cJ

ea

^3

83

Q
Ejl5

SPeiV^PoS &,H\c&,tsi

I)

S3

tf

JSx ;

JS^S

-3

si

.eTd
V.

NSI
C'CJ

t>

500

SS|g

56* tforft

65

70

feototfj-

Sa^SS"
i

- S^9i3

^^a
i

tfodo -

[^
rfoi)^
i

[iaipXio

^35*8 -

88

ES>

>*

o-as>63s>5f

Sntf^D

S55'o

it

12

'

a* s -

11

73

Lc

5TSS^a.

88

tf

&o

tfgrfgb

^Qo^ST^focOc)^:

[06^)

75

ca

33^0 3 c Ssfi*o)a.

V.

78

Strs

- ^^^

'

00-3

E3

6 q?sS^o

"3

78 ^S

^ O^gS

1.

tf

S5etf*Yfi3

as

72

as

tf

ea

&>

81

i.

73

- Sfc^tf &Ki

^555"

p&otf;s
I

^5? Snip
"3

^oe

'

SS^tf

"&.*&
,

SS^tf

3$
-ISofl*

arfo-B-i

s. c a6

i.<5

74

" 8s,

i.

*S -

eon-

eg

.2

tf

la

**<*

l.

"3

7*6

\OCFC&

53*^

Co

ea

:&

a Si sg)

8T

tftfjo

-3tf

S3

So

78

sS

tf

63

a>o[*SS>

SO.

79*

r?

90

tfo&tfs -

fi^es^^bgv

c?^

^^tfSi

& ^Kotf a

1W ^^So^

Stf^o

91

ko-Srf
wSSjS
-

L3*"fa&**

fcoBxitf^

tfg&a

S&&

- &S 1

a,*

SBjSa

3tfo
-

c^^sS

^^^
85S
-

3^a
3<3_;5a<a>

a&&
i

^^
fi

is*

^tfo

tftfjjo

92

tftf

IbeSbtfjt

w^ a eS^p

^w!0

81

tf

ea

&

itf

5*111

98

itf

CD'S'

o-e-

s-o&o^ei

f_^3*

KSo^o-

ste

tf

82

oeso'S

94

&e3t

95

83

iS
o
*

"3

^JSfio

^1

i6

So

^O
StfSs

^3^68^0

otf8

^^^o^n. *:&*

c*5
tf

^" e8

Qi

04

S
$)!$

S *j-tf 365-tfo

tfii

9T

98-

o^dfieao

ae*
t

W&CP

as

85

tf

ea 3x>

100

tf

5*^57

tf

^o

JSbi

Ja*s>rt

#0?!

t$
<*>

oSx

$3*8
i

S^i^ -

^6

88

00
eJ

10**

Sioa

lOi

Boo

s oSs

53

efo^SS -

tfond&j

8i

105
'

efts*

"3

C'3^gB5

a-8>

K&g"i

9*3

tf

Kn-

tftfo

a-

ao-u

106

tfn

S'C'ea

if

$x>

81

108

o& ^

7?

109

92

as

J
i>

yS>$KSSsr*&^

^
111

13 sS

sSeao E3Sj*Su

tfo&^fc
,

rn.cs-

la
,

- 3sa _ -i a jrs-o L

aa

12

^ cS&Srg

p&dS))53S*tfJSSo
Q

118

Et

^05

a,"!

'a*?'

16

rea

tf o

&*-

98

a, "3

118

3*0
e>

19

97

&

fo

>

a IS

98

tf

fiS^Sq

o*1W

"3

^sSc&^s
Q<3V<

io iooH*^8

ii

121

^^ff*s^z3be8C;r>^asSpcS

SsSpS
.^B ^,
19

5s

63

"

12

123

rfc -

100

3;S*aotf>t5botf

- feato

fl^s

^fc^eo

"la

SS

jo^|SSa

0*^2

^a^'^o&fi'sii

124

125

>

rto.*bn.

101

--

"IsSo

126

4S

fl

CD

127

- 3

rf

103,

n
128

dcI^Jl

tf

^b

orrfibo

^>*

^4-1 a

3^3

J6a

129

'

,-

194

&ss g

tf

tfba

afi

^35

3fi

eJ

o
0*3

e)

_
Sf

diff

105

S3

vya
i

dfc?*

106

2r

13*

L.

107

flo
i

oSS>

t*nT

S.oT

C&S

-v*

134

io

woostf

E9

s$b

135
o"

38

Inn,

WOOB-tf

Uy

tf

Sis

a-

ass.

^fficr)

Cf

Si3

tf ea

Sio

a-fi"

138

tf

tf

139

tf

;&

tf

ea

?5ntf

,3

aa
.

3)6

sStf:$8>o&& cJiS

'Sodfc

112

ii

ca

118

- AS

gr*o<S

jiS

tfrfjrfj

S3*

ii

143

tf

ea

114

144

145

tf

Sixi

tf

iSfco

- atSS

ra
Stfofi

dfco

e3&.

g'oeT

Sr>

u-

48

IS

*:*:

tf

qtf

eta

woos-es'

***

^J

149

118

jjSd&prtbe8<3j)"3

CD

e-fiS* 2

ribes;^

|fid8b5*

io L

.c
*-

^E8^<r

Scr

o4?o d&d^a^^cj'a ^Siw

O

159

(J)

Q
O
o

:$

S S

tf

119

fib

65"

<

J*0 -

152

tf iS

fir*

-|

53

-. SD

si

155

fvofl

c^^&Si^

B-tfgo

25

SP

^ fi^lS6

&

155

es^o

Sg|

S ^

tf

3- a

&

158

159"

124

&

Q*

&

tf

1-6 ft

e*

!b

3cS5oDti)

a a

S-tfeaSg

60532

162

v
i

'

8T(&4co

125

^ ciSf

53-

165

127

KSo*
r

^oi&

efSacpn-S"

167

"os

128

was"eottS>riSb.

Ij

rtSoSoA CP^D^

00.43

I7J
5tf!SCfo

172

129

5i

s
t

vJoj&im

tfo^tibdb
j

33^0 oo^S S i o&5

25

ac&*
i e*

a^t drf
le
i

1 1)3*0 ^ (pfooflbtifS^S

^3

**>

irRx>ato6

Ij

173

2.

i^

jS

130

^
S

SxS
i

4SPSSpgo

^So^co
i

<

Stfjjtfi

wo^dj

^s-c^
i

-J)^

t&*tfG<&t&cCFS)

Sro^

Sr-'S

"IS

Otf^o*^

^g "^^S)

"Sra)3*

175

06

sSa

176

-3 R)

^)

181

es fia

177

CD

"3

t^jo

- [jS
i

^tf oig

t^^iwrfS)

179

SS

6 a

3sa

SoSSS

18

J33

ea

>

A SS*

te&aS* ^tf

^S

a^

AtfsSa iotf

ca?6Sa

183

fe,o-&r L

ss

tf

tf

si

184

185

CD

s-db.

187

S)

tf

tf

13*8

So

:Sa

189

tf
<D

00

c*5bes&

137

199

tf jstf er

191

c5rtffi

CJ

6-

3$

Sbo

53

B^
i

193

fc&$F>'3s>$

<S

tfi

U"

140

136

&

5*08

Srfs' orf 5oS&

i
r

tfbtfft

141

EO

tf

A
ii
1

98

sWotfcAS

142

flo'fg'S^Sb
<TJ

a^eSeJCbtfdabg ^

tf

200

dfio
i

JiDsSb

A
201

19003*5

2'02.

3dc5BboS^

eSbo

S 5

3o

tf

85*003*5*

^P>I

203

tfop^ra&o

a*

^a&

204

0*6

wgsa

144

efifitf

2^^578
2o

S^ ^^srS"

sfo

KO^
205

Co
r

^^S'^ag'*

So

3o

Soseo^o
Soeacjp^b^
r

(s*^

^^^Sx)

o^Asf i^Sbo

US

a.
s[|)

'0 -

218

tf

148

>
i

20

c3s t

*c(Sd)

^Soabs

&e

AapsSr*
_

^^^^^^oS

o^S *3'3j>c&a f

208

S3

tf

ed

SSoi

H7

20i

3*35755^83

2)

tf

fSS>se*a&i

tf

'

us

SDjoSri,

(jS

tfl*

21!

[*
R)
j

o*?io^
SfosSoff
8
,

^SSS"

6^

53

aa^bo

e)

212
*****

349

franco B'tfSa.

SfoSfS

tf

^^O^JES
i

cSg^N^oro^

rora^co /(o
1

^
i

SilSe

S^oc^o^o^"^

^cc^6

-^oo5o^x>o5*

(dfio

^s

tfoS3i

oi^ -

&>KOO

tf

&>

214

C3*sSSo*gc3Sro
^-S5

57 u

2 15

15 (T

ea

218
^

>

tf

2l7

s?

tf

ito
tf

d&3&>

ea

152

219?

220

9o

154

tf

tf

* &*

S 3

53

223

rf

lotf - SbOdSa?6>
i

frtfctfl?
i

Sja3oififi^
'

^ScBcp^d'*.
tfStf

Ib

2def

esocxjotfa^^

^^^^

^ofig

d?6

Vod^osp

185

55*0 -

!ba

ss -'*>$

83

224
225

ES

&>

XOBKSS.
i

*****

rttf s>

63

S*
227

cr
<)

"105

0*1

st

228

Si

iB-o

tf

"

a-

5-

231

t)S

Sca-or

aofl

be

160

on
233

^
S
r

fc

S^Q di^ifo s^oiptftf^SaaJBtf^p

>

oi
rfctfSo 5

^s

V<r?

^sSod
i

- M^tSi^O
S*odbo3

<So^

?S6cyd8b^^o

CSbt^cSSbs

SSbdio

161

CO

"I

85

234

6'

:&

"a!

.
=

=S

162

tf

ea

235

163

2)
So-jidfciS
6)

6)
8)

7)
5j-

10)

II)

12)

wcCo

ajcfib

!,

2)

4)

^fiJSb

5)

fSc

7j

8)

3i

a'!

10)

9)

ii)

S3

>*

236

a ^N
fl

S^
.

6
j>

tJ

cJ1

^8
*

ii

237

fcfib

531

166

5Sca<3j*895&*&SSg.

1.

3.

4.
5.

6.
7.

8.

JO.
11

12.
13.

14. 15.

16
17.

18-

19.

20.

142

146
143
1-53

77
128

34

51

149

133
139

145
128

151
36

U7
108

127

128

45
121

1H
6?

117 129
122

U8 n

124
91

UQ
132
131
111

101

US
141

159
47
157 126
6

82

82
88
89
99 100

155
93

1?8
184

44
100

150
35

85

147

III

16-2-1983,
(S)

A.

"S.

jl^

(I)

o. S*. sp

^
^ea

A.

"3.

(J)Sp5"

:c:>3i d >
D. L.

(<. 3 y )v

i"

<Do. a).

3. r.

I
1.

P, 'Govt. -X

and
y^.^.,..-^^ -n.
>*-

| 4
f*

SEETA KALYANAMU'tTetugu)
By
Sri

Rs p 3-75

4*

Shahajee Maharaja Bonsle

(Telugu) poets ofwantiquity

2.

SRINGARA PADAMULU
By Unknown

^ '"

4-40 4-00

4 4
^|

*f

4
|
4

3.

INDUMATEE PARINAY^B/IU
'

4.

T jr ^ J ^* T
T

4L

& SREE GEETA SANKARAM

By
Sri

SREE GEETA GOVIND^^^,, /"4/ "'^'^

'

(Telugu) By Tenali Ranfiabhadfe^fi^^- _

JL
\
.

Jayedeva Kavi

^
j*
.3.75

)
)

By
5.

Sri

Pancharatnakavi Anantachaiya (Sanskrit in Telugu Script)

*J **

*^
3-75
*?*

RADHA VAMSEEDHAR VILAS NATAK

By
Sri

(Hindi)

Shahajee Maharaja Bonsle

**
If

6.

ENUGULA VEERASWAMY'S JOURNAL

(Kasiyatra Charitra translated into English)
-

14-00

^
*4* 4*

7,

8,

SREE VIRUPAKSHA SREERAMA COPPER PLATE INSCRIPTIONS (1576-1644A.D.) VAIKRITA CHANDRIKA (Telugu Script)
Telugu Grammar in Sanskrit B Y Manchella Vasudeva Kavi
,

50-00
38.00

4
4*

J T ^
4* 4*

j^

^ X IT X ; V **
4* 4* 4^ 4* 4*

9,

NARADEEYA PURANAMU

(Telugu)

65-00

10.
1-1-

By Alladu Narasimha Kavi KAVI CHINTAMANI (Telugu) By Vellanki Tatambhattu

f
4^

25-00

12.
'

& R.I. UDAYANODAYAMU [Including 'VANAMALt VI LASAMU '-abridged

in

An Alphabetical Subjectwis.e INDEX OF TELUGU MANUSCRIPTS

A.P.G.O.MX.
47-00
copy]
1.53-10

* ^

By Narana Surana
13.

ARSHA KUTUMBAMU
Vasireddy Durgasadasiveswara Prasad An Alphabetical Subjectwise

By

Sri

47-00
26-00

14;

INDEX OF SANSKRIT MANUSCRIPTS

available
15.
16*
*

A T X
J^

4* 4* 4*

& R.I. TARAKABRAHMARAAJEEYAMU

in

A.P.G. O.M.L.

Vol.

4* 4* 4*

by Chintalapudi Ellanarya An Alphabetical Subjectwise

'.

34-00
39-00 25-00

INDEX OF URDU

Etc.

MANUSCRIPTS

VIJ-NANA SARASWATI

&

jfo

Quarterly Journal be had of can Copies

in

Telugu

&
R.I.

English

The

Director, A.P.G.O.M.L.

&

HYDERABAD

1.
4

^4.4*4* ^4*44*^^^4*^^4**I*

I*^4