Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Approval of Public Agenda Minutes of the meeting held on March 12 and 14, 2014.
Administration Reports EX14-13 Regina Revitalization Initiative (RRI) - Stadium Project Delegation of Authority, Financial Model Update and External Financing Recommendation 1. That the following delegation of authority be approved: a. That all authority delegated to the Deputy City Manager & CFO, Corporate Services in City Council reports CR 13-6, CR 13-8 and CR13-96 be reassigned to the Deputy City Manager & COO or his or her delegate. b. That City Council authorizes the Deputy City Manager & COO or his or her delegate to prepare, negotiate, review, amend and approve any additional documentation, instruments, assurances and auxiliary closing documents as may be necessary, to give full effect to the Project Agreement entered into with the successful proponent identified and to complete the Project (the Additional Documentation). c. That City Council authorize the City Clerk to execute any additional documentation after review and approval from the City Solicitor. 2. That the information contained within this report, updating the financial model estimates previously approved by City Council in CR 13-6, be received and filed. 3. That City Council authorizes the Deputy City Manager & COO to negotiate external financing, including signing any necessary documents, to a maximum of $100.4 million to address the loan financing requirements of the RRI Stadium Project. 4. That a report summarizing the financing arrangements to be negotiated, to a maximum of $100.4 million, be forwarded to City Council with a bylaw once the external financing has been arranged.
EX14-14
SAMA Annual Meeting Recommendation That the Executive Committee make a recommendation to City Council for a member of City Council to be the voting delegate for Regina at the Saskatchewan Assessment Management Agency (SAMA) Annual Meeting on April 16, 2014.
Other Reports EX14-15 Executive Committee: Downtown Transportation Study (DTS) Phases Two and Three and Direction for Downtown Transit in Regina Recommendation 1. That the Downtown Transportation Study (DTS) Phases Two and Three Report as outlined in Appendix A be APPROVED and the Administration be directed to incorporate the specific initiatives in the DTS as outlined in Appendix B into the appropriate work plans as budget and resources permit. 2. That, recognizing that 11th Avenue is a major destination for transit customers, Regina Transit buses continue to serve stops on 11th Avenue and measures be put in place to mitigate the impacts of these transit stops on businesses fronting 11th Avenue, including: Providing adequate transit stop amenities including waste receptacles and attractive shelters to reduce littering and discourage use of building entrances; Relocation of eastbound bus stops from in front of Old City Hall Mall to the block between Lorne Street and Cornwall Street, with modifications to Lorne Street to ensure appropriate turning movements can be provided; Design of a dual street transit hub that includes Lorne Street between 11th and 12th Avenues, reducing the number of transfers on 11th Avenue; Expanding existing security patrols over the entire business day on 11th Avenue between Cornwall Street and Hamilton Street; Adjusting schedules and timing points of transit routes to minimize layover time on 11th Avenue; Reviewing ridership patterns and adjusting bus route assignments to stops to reflect available sidewalk space; and, Undertaking a passenger education and awareness program to discourage loitering in private buildings and littering.
3. That $200,000 in funding be allocated from the General Fund Reserve for the enhanced security patrol, transit stop amenities, increasing transit activities on Lorne Street and the relocation of bus stops from in front of Old City Hall and that opportunities for supplemental or shared funding from Regina Downtown Business Improvement District (RDBID) and others be explored. 4. That a downtown transit shuttle service, to replace regular transit services is not feasible at this time, but that the City of Regina retain the concept as a long-term option to support redevelopment and connect the downtown with the new stadium, the Regina Revitalization Initiative (RRI), and the Warehouse District. 5. That the recommended plan for additional cycling facilities on downtown streets as identified in the DTS be included in the City-wide Transportation Master Plan. 6. That Administration be directed to establish a Downtown Transportation Working group to provide open channels of communication to address emergent issues related to downtown transportation and that this working group include representation from RDBID, Regina Transit, City Operations, and the Accessibility Advisory Committee. 7. That strategies for the management and supply of parking in the downtown be finalized through the Downtown and Vicinity Parking Study. 8. That item MN13-4 Downtown Transit Shuttle Service be removed from the List of Outstanding Items for City Council. 9. That the Administration explore a partnership with other organizations to build a new parking structure downtown. 10. That this report be forwarded to the April 14, 2014 City Council meeting for consideration.
AT REGINA, SASKATCHEWAN, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12, 2014 AT A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE HELD IN PUBLIC SESSION AT 11:45 AM
These are considered a draft rendering of the official minutes. Official minutes can be obtained through the Office of the City Clerk once approved. Present: Councillor Bob Hawkins, in the Chair Mayor Michael Fougere Councillor Bryon Burnett Councillor Barbara Young Councillor Sharron Bryce Councillor John Findura Councillor Terry Hincks Councillor Wade Murray Councillor Mike ODonnell Councillor Shawn Fraser Councillor Jerry Flegel
Regrets:
A/City Clerk, Erna Hall Also in Attendance: City Manager & CAO, Glen Davies Solicitor, Christine Clifford Deputy City Manager & COO, Brent Sjoberg A/CFO, Pat Gartner Executive Director, Planning, Jason Carlston A/Executive Director, City Services, Neil Vandendort Director, Development Engineering, Kelly Scherr Director, Planning, Diana Hawryluk Coordinator, Social Development, Janice Solomon Committee Assistant, Mavis Torres APPROVAL OF PUBLIC AGENDA Councillor Sharron Bryce moved, AND IT WAS RESOLVED, that the agenda for this meeting be approved, as submitted, and that the delegations be heard in the order they are called by the Chairperson. ADOPTION OF MINUTES Councillor Wade Murray moved, AND IT WAS RESOLVED, that the minutes for the meeting held on February 12, 2014 be adopted, as circulated.
City Administration Reorganization and Bylaw Amendments Recommendation That the City Solicitor be instructed to prepare the necessary changes to The Regina Administration Bylaw to give effect to the organizational changes contained in the body of this report.
Chad Novak, representing the Saskatchewan Taxpayers Advocacy Group addressed the Committee. Councillor Terry Hincks moved, AND IT WAS RESOLVED, that the recommendation contained in the report be concurred in. EX14-9 Homelessness Partnering Strategy 2014-2019 Recommendation 1. That Council endorse, in principle, the Homelessness Partnering Strategy and Housing First by continuing to complement the work of the federal government through existing City programs. 2. That the Administration continue to provide regular updates, including any financial implications, to the Mayors Housing Commission and Council on the Homelessness Partnering Strategy, Housing First and other homelessness issues. 3. That item E14-8 be removed from the list of outstanding items for the Executive Committee. 4. That this report be forwarded to the March 24, 2014 meeting of City Council. Chad Novak, representing the Saskatchewan Taxpayers Advocacy Group addressed the Committee. Councillor Barbara Young moved, AND IT WAS RESOLVED, that the recommendations contained in the report be concurred in. CITY CLERK'S REPORT E14-10 Committee Structure Review Recommendation 1. That no changes be made to the existing structure, membership or mandate of the following Main Committees of Council, as outlined in Bylaw No. 2009-40, Section 5(1): a. Community and Protective Services Committee;
b. c. d. e. f. g.
-3Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Emergency Measures Committee; Executive Committee; Finance and Administration Committee; Mayors Housing Commission Public Works Committee Regina Planning Commission
2. That notwithstanding recommendation (1), that the Public Works Committee be renamed Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. 3. That Administration undertake a review of items being submitted for committee consideration to ensure that the item is placed on the appropriate committee agenda and provide a report back to Executive Committee by March 31, 2015. 4. That no changes be made at this time to the existing structure, membership or mandate of the following Secondary Committees of Council, as outlined in Bylaw 2009-40, Section 17(1): a. Accessibility Advisory Committee b. Arts Advisory Committee c. Community Leaders Advisory Committee d. Community Services Advisory Committee e. Environment Advisory Committee f. Municipal Heritage Advisory Committee g. School Board/City Council Liaison Committee h. Youth Advisory Committee 5. That members of Secondary Committees of Council whose terms have expired remain as members of the committee until such time as they are either re-appointed or a successor is appointed by Council. 6. That notwithstanding recommendation (3), that the Administration prepare a report outlining leading practices, inter-jurisdictional comparisons and options respecting civic engagement practices that could enhance, complement or replace the existing committee structure and related practices and return to Executive Committee in Q3 2014. 7. That the City Solicitor prepare the necessary bylaw changes respecting recommendations (2) and (5). Dr. Greg Argue, representing the Strategy by Design addressed and answered questions of the Committee. Mayor Michael Fougere moved, AND IT WAS RESOLVED, that the recommendations contained in the report be concurred in.
-4-
RESOLUTION FOR PRIVATE SESSION Councillor Sharron Bryce moved, AND IT WAS RESOLVED, that in the interest of the public, the remainder of the items on the agenda be considered in private. RECESS Councillor Sharron Bryce moved, AND IT WAS RESOLVED, that the meeting recess for five minutes. Meeting recessed at 1:30 pm
Chairperson
Secretary
AT REGINA, SASKATCHEWAN, FRIDAY, MARCH 14, 2014 AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE HELD IN PUBLIC SESSION AT 11:45 AM
These are considered a draft rendering of the official minutes. Official minutes can be obtained through the Office of the City Clerk once approved. Present: Councillor Bob Hawkins, in the Chair Mayor Michael Fougere Councillor Bryon Burnett Councillor Sharron Bryce Councillor John Findura Councillor Terry Hincks Councillor Wade Murray Councillor Mike ODonnell Councillor Jerry Flegel Councillor Shawn Fraser Councillor Barbara Young
Regrets:
A/City Clerk, Erna Hall Also in Attendance: City Manager & CAO, Glen Davies Executive Director, Legal & Risk, Byron Werry Deputy City Manager & COO, Brent Sjoberg A/CFO, Pat Gartner A/Executive Director of City Services, Neil Vandendort Solicitor, Mark Yamen Manager, Rod Schmidt, Stadium Development Committee Assistant, Mavis Torres APPROVAL OF PUBLIC AGENDA Councillor Sharron Bryce moved, AND IT WAS RESOLVED, that the agenda for this meeting be approved, after approving the addition of item EX14-12 Regina Revitalization Initiative (RRI) Stadium Project Notification of Preferred Proponent. The motion was put and declared CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
RRI Stadium Project - RFP Notification of Preferred Proponent Recommendation That this communication be received and filed.
(Mayor Michael Fougere declared a conflict of interest stating that his previous work with the construction industry may be viewed as a conflict. Mayor Fougere left the meeting) Chad Novak, representing the Saskatchewan Taxpayers Advocacy Group addressed the Committee. Bill Clary, representing himself addressed and answered questions of the Committee. Councillor Terry Hincks moved, AND IT WAS RESOLVED, that this communication be received and filed. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS EX14-12 Regina Revitalization Initiative (RRI) Stadium Project - Notification of Preferred Proponent Recommendation That this report be forwarded to the March 24, 2014 meeting of City Council for information. Councillor Sharron Bryce moved, AND IT WAS RESOLVED, that the recommendation contained in the report be concurred in.
ADJOURNMENT Councillor John Findura moved, AND IT WAS RESOLVED, that the meeting adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 12:45 p.m.
Chairperson
Secretary
Tracking Number
April 2, 2014 To: Members, Executive Committee Regina Revitalization Initiative (RRI) - Stadium Project Delegation of Authority, Financial Model Update and External Financing
Re:
RECOMMENDATION 1. That the following delegation of authority be approved: a. That all authority delegated to the Deputy City Manager & CFO, Corporate Services in City Council reports CR 13-6, CR 13-8 and CR13-96 be reassigned to the Deputy City Manager & COO or his or her delegate. b. That City Council authorizes the Deputy City Manager & COO or his or her delegate to prepare, negotiate, review, amend and approve any additional documentation, instruments, assurances and auxiliary closing documents as may be necessary, to give full effect to the Project Agreement entered into with the successful proponent identified and to complete the Project (the Additional Documentation). c. That City Council authorize the City Clerk to execute any additional documentation after review and approval from the City Solicitor. 2. That the information contained within this report, updating the financial model estimates previously approved by City Council in CR 13-6, be received and filed. 3. That City Council authorizes the Deputy City Manager & COO to negotiate external financing, including signing any necessary documents, to a maximum of $100.4 million to address the loan financing requirements of the RRI Stadium Project. 4. That a report summarizing the financing arrangements to be negotiated, to a maximum of $100.4 million, be forwarded to City Council with a bylaw once the external financing has been arranged. CONCLUSION The Administration is nearing the completion of the procurement for the Regina Revitalization Initiative Stadium Project (the Project). The identification of a Preferred Proponent from the Request for Proposals (RFP) stage of the Project occurred on March 14th. The next stage in the process is for the City to enter into a design-build-finance agreement with the Preferred Proponent (the Project Agreement) and to achieve commercial close of the transaction. In order to facilitate the closing of the transaction, the following items require City Council approval: 1) Due to organizational structure changes within the City, clarification is required to the delegated authority previously provided by City Council; 2) Council report CR 13-96 provided the Administration the delegated authority to enter into the Project Agreement with the Preferred Proponent. In addition to the Project Agreement, several other ancillary documents will be required to complete the transaction. The Administration recommends that City Council authorize the Deputy
-2City Manager & COO or his or her delegate to prepare, negotiate, review and approve such additional documentation, with the City Clerk authorized to execute such additional documentation, as may be required to complete the Project. On January 28, 2013 (CR13-6) City Council approved the financial model for the Project. The financial model has been updated based on more recent information. There are no changes to the overall financial commitment figures relating to the capital costs, total debt, or mill rate increases, as previously contemplated and approved by Council. In addition to the process related recommendations related to the Project, this report is also seeking the approval of Council to authorize the Deputy City Manager & COO to negotiate the remaining external financing required for the Project. This will include signing any necessary documents, to a maximum of $100.4 million. Once negotiated, this external financing must be approved by City Council. BACKGROUND Since its inception in the spring of 2012, several elements of the Project have been before City Council to provide information and receive approvals. A summary of the Council reports to date is as follows: 1) July 23, 2012 CR 12-102 City Council provided the Administration with the direction to develop definitive funding agreements with the Province of Saskatchewan (the Province) and the Saskatchewan Roughrider Football Club Inc. (SRFC), based upon the memorandum of understanding provided; 2) September 17, 2012 CR 12-134 City Council authorized the Deputy City Manager & CFO to proceed with a design-build-finance procurement approach for the Project, consisting of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and RFP process; 3) January 28, 2013 CR 13-5 City Council approved the concept design presented and authorized the administration to proceed with the procurement phase of the Project; 4) January 28, 2013 CR 13-6 City Council approved the funding model for the Project, including the related borrowing amounts and other funding sources, and authorized the Deputy City Manager & CFO to negotiate and approve the funding agreements, with the Province and the SRFC and the leasing arrangements with the SRFC; 5) January 28, 2013 CR 13-8 City Council directed the Administration to issue a RFQ for the Project, and delegated authority to the Deputy City Manager & CFO to award an opportunity to three successful proponents, identified by the RFQ process to participate in the RFP process for the Project; 6) July 8, 2013 CR 13-96 City Council directed the Administration to issue the RFP for the Project, and delegated authority to the Deputy City Manager & CFO to award a contract to the successful proponent identified by the RFP process; 7) July 8, 2013 CR 13-97 City Council approved an offer to lease with SaskSport and authorized the City Solicitor and Deputy City Manager & CFO to approve the final form lease agreement with SaskSport;
-38) January 27, 2014 CM 14-1 City Council passed The Regina Revitalization Initiative Debenture Bylaw, 2014, which completed the borrowing of $100.0 million from the Municipal Financing Corporation of Saskatchewan; and 9) March 24, 2014 IR 14-5 City Council received notification from the Administration of the Preferred Proponent that was identified by the RFP stage of the Project. With the initial $100 million borrowing from the Province completed, the remaining $100.4 million in borrowing relating to the Citys contributions remains outstanding. The long-term debt of the City is subject to the provisions of The Cities Act and the Citys debt limit as authorized by the Saskatchewan Municipal Board. The following are the applicable sections of The Cities Act: "101(1) No Council shall delegate: (f) its power to borrow money, lend money or guarantee the repayment of a loan pursuant to section 133 to 153; 133(1) The Saskatchewan Municipal Board may establish a debt limit for each city, taking into account the factors set out in subsection 23(2) of The Municipal Board Act. (2) No city shall borrow money if the borrowing will cause the city to exceed its debt limit, unless the borrowing is approved by the Saskatchewan Municipal Board. 134(1) A city may only borrow moneys if the borrowing is authorized by a borrowing bylaw. (2) A borrowing bylaw must contain details of: (a) the amount of money to be borrowed and, in general terms, the purpose for which the money is to be borrowed; (b) the rate or rates of interest, the term and the terms of repayment of the borrowing; and (c) the source or sources of money to be used to pay the principal and interest owing under the borrowing." Legislation allows for cities to incur long-term debt without application to the Saskatchewan Municipal Board, providing the debt does not exceed the amount authorized by the Saskatchewan Municipal Board pursuant to Section 133(2). In 2013, the City requested and received approval from the Saskatchewan Municipal Board for a debt limit of $450.0 million. DISCUSSION Delegation of Authority The Administration requires clarification of City Councils previous approval authority for the Project that was provided in CR13-6, CR14-8 and CR13-96 due to the corporate reorganization that took place on January 1, 2014. As the position of Deputy City Manager & CFO, Corporate Services has been realigned, the Administration recommends that City Council reassign the authorities provided to the Deputy City Manager & CFO, Corporate Services to the Deputy City Manager & COO, or his or her delegate. This modification will allow the Project to continue forward toward delivery on the overall objectives.
-4Additional Documentation Following the notification of the Preferred Proponent, the City is working towards financial close of the transaction in May of 2014. As part of the financial close of the transaction, the City may need to enter into the additional documentation to give full effect to the Project Agreement. The additional documentation could include such items as agreements with lenders, warranty certificates, undertakings, closing certificates and legal opinions, all of which are typical for large commercial transactions of this type. Administration is seeking delegated authority for the Deputy City Manager & COO to approve such additional documentation. Financial Modelling As noted, the commercial and financial close process is expected to be completed in May of 2014. To ensure the proper authorities are in place to enter into this contract, it is important to ensure City Council is aware of the most current financial estimates related to the project. On January 28, 2013 (CR13-6) City Council approved the financial model for the Project. As the Project is now at a more advanced stage, the model can be updated with more recent and accurate information. This report provides City Council with a financial model that has been updated with the information known to date, and shows no changes to the overall financial commitment figures relating to capital cost, total debt, or mill rate increases, as previously contemplated and approved by Council. The financial model for the Project approved by Council (CR13-6) and contemplated below includes the pursuit of up to $200.4 million in debt over a period of 30 years. This represents the $100.0 million loan from the Province for capital that was approved by Council (CM 14-1) and an additional $100.4 million City debt, which includes $67.4 million City debt for capital and $33.0 million City debt for interim cash flow purposes in 2015. As the procurement phase of the Project is nearly complete, the City (working with the Saskatchewan Roughrider Football Club Inc. and the Regina Exhibition Association Limited) has obtained more accurate financial, costing and operational estimates from which it can update the financial model for the Project. The following is the most up to date financial model as of March 2014:
Expenditure Expense Amount (in millions $) 250.0 28.2 Funding Source Funding Amount (in millions $) 80.0 100.0 25.0 3.3 2.5 67.4 278.2
Total Capital Cost Maintenance & Debt Servicing Costs Maintenance Provincial Loan Principal Payments Provincial Loan - Interest Payments City Capital Debt Principal Payments City Debt Interest Payments City Interim Debt Financing Principal and Interest Payments Total Maintenance & Debt Servicing Costs Contingency Total
278.2
Capital Funding Provincial Grant Provincial Loan SRFC City Land Contribution City Cash City Loan Total Capital Funding Sources Maintenance & Debt Servicing Funding SRFC Facility Fee SaskSport Lease Agreement Property Tax Interim Debt Mosaic Cost Avoidance Advertising/Sponsorships Interest Earned Total Maintenance & Debt Servicing Funding Sources
569.9
-5All revisions made to the financial model for the Project were able to be accommodated through the various contingencies built into the financial model, previously approved by Council on January 28, 2013 (CR 13-6). There are no changes to the overall financial commitment figures relating to capital costs, total debt, or mill rate increases, as previously contemplated and approved by Council. The updated financial model simply reflects changes to the anticipated expenditures and revenues within the model, due to changing interest rates and assumptions that were clarified as the Project has progressed. The contingencies built into the January 28, 2013 financial model are available to provide an additional $47.5 million in revenue to offset additional costs. These contingencies were built into the model to mitigate risks associated with the assumptions used in the model, as expenditures and revenues are based on the best information available at the time they are projected. The changes to anticipated expenditures and revenues in the updated financial model are outlined below. The revised expenditures in the updated model are: 1) Increased interest rates that were encountered in 2013. The interest rate for the $100.0 million Provincial loan that was approved by Council on January 27, 2014 (Bylaw 2014-9) was 3.99% rather than 3.5%, which was the rate included within the January 28, 2013 financial model. 2) As previously known and approved in CR 13-6, in order to fund the Citys portion of the cost related to the Project and to ensure appropriate funding is available for the City for the Project and other matters, the City will be borrowing $100.4 million sometime during 2014-2015. As approved in CR 13-6, this amount included $67.4 million of City debt for capital and $33.0 million City debt for interim cash flow purposes. The exact timing of the borrowing will be based upon the Citys cash flow needs as well as interest rate trends. The January 28, 2013 financial model assumed a rate of interest of 4.0%, but due to market trends, it is now estimated that this interest rate will be 4.5%. The revised revenues included in the updated model are: 1) Facility fees ($4.6 million increase) as a contingency, the City did not include estimated revenue for CFL playoff games and additional revenue in expected Grey Cup years in the January 28, 2013 model. These items have now been included within the updated model. 2) Property taxes ($47.0 million increase) as a contingency within the previous financial model, a portion of the mill rate to be ear-marked for the Project was not allocated for the last nine years of the model. The mill rate to be ear-marked for the Project is now allocated for the entire term of the model, to specifically identify the available contingency within the projections. 3) Interest revenue ($4.1 million decrease) the City maintains a fund balance at certain points during the Project and is able to earn interest on these amounts. The anticipated revenue available from this interest earned has been decreased due to lower investment interest rates. The updated financial model assumes a rate of 3.2% versus the rate of 3.5% that was used in the January 28, 2013 model. The contingencies address the changes in market conditions and Project assumptions known to date, without altering the overall financial commitment relating to borrowing or mill rate as previously approved by Council. The updated financial model shows an estimated contingency of
-6$21.6 million. Of the $47.5 million in contingency available in the January 28, 2013 financial model approved by Council, $25.9 million has been allocated to mitigate the projected increases related to the most up to date borrowing costs. External Financing On January 28, 2013, City Council approved the funding model for the RRI Stadium Project. Included in the funding model is up to $100.4 million of debt ($67.4 million of City debt for capital and $33.0 million City debt for interim cash flow purposes). Due to the current market conditions with low interest rates, coupled with projections of higher interest rates in the future, the Administration is recommending that the City proceed with up to a $100.4 million debt issuance in 2014. While a debt issuance requires a bylaw approved by City Council, due to the nature of the capital markets, it is necessary for the Deputy City Manager & COO to have the authority from City Council to undertake the borrowing, with the details of the borrowing subsequently approved by City Council by way of a borrowing bylaw. Similar to the recent issuance of the $100.0 million Provincial loan, this approach to borrowing has been followed in the past and recognizes the need to provide a quick response to the fiscal agents. The authority granted to the Deputy City Manager & COO is subject to the approval of a bylaw by City Council. Key points with respect to this process are: City Council has the authority to not proceed with a debt issue on the terms conditionally agreed to by the Deputy City Manager & COO. However, if City Council did not approve the borrowing bylaw based on the details agreed to with the fiscal agents, there could be irreparable harm done to the City's ability to borrow externally. The timing of external borrowing is dependent on market conditions. However, once the Deputy City Manager & COO authorizes the external financial institution to proceed, the debt issuance must be completed within several days to ensure that committed rates are obtained. Given the schedule of City Council meetings there is the potential a special City Council meeting would be required. With a potential financing of up to $100.4 million, the City's position relative to the authorized debt limit of $450.0 million is as detailed in the following table.
Water and Sewer Utility Debt(1) General Debt(1) Service Agreement Fee Credits - The Creeks(2) Committed General Capital Borrowing (2010, 2011, & 2012 Budgets)(3) Committed Utility Borrowing (2012 Budget) RRI Stadium $100 million Debt Current Committed Total RRI Stadium $100.4 million debt Total
Notes:
(3)
316,600,000
-7(1) Outstanding balance at December 31, 2013. (2) The maximum debt that could be incurred by the City as per the borrowing bylaw agreements. (3) To date, this debt has been authorized but not issued.
As detailed in the above table, a proposed borrowing of $100.4 million is within the authorized debt limit. It should be noted that the debt limit of $450.0 million was not intended to represent the theoretical maximum debt that could be sustained by the City of Regina. The limit was requested on the basis that it met the Citys projected maximum debt requirement for the foreseeable future. While the projected debt after issuance of the $100.4 million in debt is below the debt limit, it is important to note that in the next five years, debt is expected to be very close to the debt limit due to future debt related to the wastewater treatment plant. RECOMMENDATION IMPLICATIONS Financial Implications The first five years of the financial plan, beginning 2012, has a substantial financial impact on the City. A $2.5 million General Fund Reserve contribution was required in 2012 to fund project management and consulting costs. The Provincial contribution assists the City with its early year cash flows. However, debt is required to manage cash out flows for construction progress payments. As previously contemplated and approved in CR 13-6, while the financial model shows the Project fully funded over the 30 year time period, there are individual years where the cumulative cash flow is temporarily negative. These negative cash flows may need to be temporarily funded by the Citys available cash/reserves, which has no impact on the revenues or expenditures within the model. As planned, repayment of debt principal and interest will begin in 2014. As such, a consecutive ten year property tax mill rate increase of 0.45% which started in 2013 will be required to maintain future financing and maintenance payments. As a contingency within the financial model approved by Council on January 28, 2013, a portion of the mill rate to be ear-marked for the Project was not allocated for the last nine years of the model. The mill rate to be ear-marked for the Project is now allocated for the entire term of the model, to specifically identify the available contingency. In addition, a cumulative annual growth rate of 2% is assumed on the property tax revenue accumulated annually. Interest earnings will accrue on any unspent stadium funding and be allocated to the Stadium Project. As noted, if any of assumptions in the financial model change or do not come to realization, contingent revenue options will be required and brought forward in future budget requests. In the updated financial model, the 30 year capital commitment to the Project is $278.2 million and the projected financing and maintenance commitment in the financial model equates to $548.3 million before contingency, and $569.9 million including contingency. At the July 23, 2012 City Council meeting the financing and maintenance commitment was initially estimated at $675.0 million. Therefore, the updated financial model remains more favourable than the initial Project estimates. As noted, the financial projections contain various estimates and risks that are subject to change until final contracts and/or pricing is achieved. The revenue funding split is $180.0 million from the Provincial contribution and loan, $75.0 million from SaskSport, $144.6 million from the SRFC and the remaining $448.5 million in funding from various City revenue streams.
-8Environmental Implications None related to this report. Strategic Implications Having a funding model in place helps ensure the project can be paid for and the goals of the project can be met, including the long-term asset management requirements. The Stadium Project is the first step in completing the overall Regina Revitalization Initiative (RRI) plan. The next phases would include the Railyard Renewal Project and the Taylor Field Neighbourhood Project. Other Implications None related to this report. Accessibility Implications None related to this report. COMMUNICATIONS The RRI website, ReginaRevitalization.ca, was launched on September 19, 2012 to house and share information relating to the Project. The website is regularly updated to include additional information. Administration will continue to keep the public and other stakeholders informed of progress and decisions related to the Project. Public Notice has been given as required by Section 101 and 102 of The Cities Act and Bylaw 2003-8. DELEGATED AUTHORITY This report requires City Council approval. Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted,
EX14-14
April 2, 2014
To:
Re:
RECOMMENDATION That the Executive Committee make a recommendation to City Council for a member of City Council to be the voting delegate for Regina at the Saskatchewan Assessment Management Agency (SAMA) Annual Meeting on April 16, 2014. CONCLUSION The Saskatchewan Assessment Management Agency (SAMA) has scheduled its annual general meeting for April 16, 2013 in Regina. SAMAs Bylaws require that voting delegates be an elected official of, and be appointed by, a Municipal Council. Non voting delegates are also allowed to register and attend the meeting. Voting occurs on resolutions submitted to the SAMA Board. BACKGROUND The Saskatchewan Assessment Management Agency (SAMA) is holding an annual general meeting on April 16, 2014 and City Council may appoint a voting delegate and other members of council and administration may register as non voting delegates. DISCUSSION SAMA has scheduled its annual general meeting for April 16, 2013 in Regina. SAMAs Bylaws require that voting delegates be an elected official of and be appointed by a Municipal Council. Non voting delegates are also allowed to register and attend the meeting. Voting occurs on resolutions submitted to the SAMA Board. The Bylaws of SAMA require that City Council appoint one voting delegate and other nonvoting delegates for the SAMA Annual General meeting to be held on April 16, 2014 at the Saskatoon Travelodge. Councillor Murray sits on the SAMA Board of Directors as the representative appointed by SUMA and as a SAMA Board member may be conducting business at the meeting on behalf of the board therefore City Council could appoint another member as the voting delegate. RECOMMENDATION IMPLICATIONS Financial Implications The registration fees and costs for the SAMA Annual General Meeting are within the 2014 budget.
-2Environmental Implications None with regards to this report Policy and/or Strategic Implications SAMA is a strategic partner in providing advice and forwarding improvements to the assessment system in the province. Other Implications None with regards to this report. Accessibility Implications None with regards to this report. COMMUNICATIONS A copy of this report will be provided to SAMA. DELEGATED AUTHORITY This report must be considered by City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
Respectfully submitted,
Don Barr, Director / City Assessor Assessment, Tax & Real Estate
Report prepared by: Don Barr, Director / City Assessor
EX14-15
April 2, 2014
To:
Members, Executive Committee Downtown Transportation Study (DTS) Phases Two and Three and Direction for Downtown Transit in Regina
Re:
RECOMMENDATION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - MARCH 12, 2014 1. That the Downtown Transportation Study (DTS) Phases Two and Three Report as outlined in Appendix A be APPROVED and the Administration be directed to incorporate the specific initiatives in the DTS as outlined in Appendix B into the appropriate work plans as budget and resources permit. 2. That, recognizing that 11th Avenue is a major destination for transit customers, Regina Transit buses continue to serve stops on 11th Avenue and measures be put in place to mitigate the impacts of these transit stops on businesses fronting 11th Avenue, including: Providing adequate transit stop amenities including waste receptacles and attractive shelters to reduce littering and discourage use of building entrances; Relocation of eastbound bus stops from in front of Old City Hall Mall to the block between Lorne Street and Cornwall Street, with modifications to Lorne Street to ensure appropriate turning movements can be provided; Design of a dual street transit hub that includes Lorne Street between 11th and 12th Avenues, reducing the number of transfers on 11th Avenue; Expanding existing security patrols over the entire business day on 11th Avenue between Cornwall Street and Hamilton Street; Adjusting schedules and timing points of transit routes to minimize layover time on 11th Avenue; Reviewing ridership patterns and adjusting bus route assignments to stops to reflect available sidewalk space; and, Undertaking a passenger education and awareness program to discourage loitering in private buildings and littering.
3. That $200,000 in funding be allocated from the General Fund Reserve for the enhanced security patrol, transit stop amenities, increasing transit activities on Lorne Street and the relocation of bus stops from in front of Old City Hall and that opportunities for supplemental or shared funding from Regina Downtown Business Improvement District (RDBID) and others be explored. 4. That a downtown transit shuttle service, to replace regular transit services is not feasible at this time, but that the City of Regina retain the concept as a long-term option to support redevelopment and connect the downtown with the new stadium, the Regina Revitalization Initiative (RRI), and the Warehouse District.
-25. That the recommended plan for additional cycling facilities on downtown streets as identified in the DTS be included in the City-wide Transportation Master Plan. 6. That Administration be directed to establish a Downtown Transportation Working group to provide open channels of communication to address emergent issues related to downtown transportation and that this working group include representation from RDBID, Regina Transit, City Operations, and the Accessibility Advisory Committee. 7. That strategies for the management and supply of parking in the downtown be finalized through the Downtown and Vicinity Parking Study. 8. That item MN13-4 Downtown Transit Shuttle Service be removed from the List of Outstanding Items for City Council. 9. That the Administration explore a partnership with other organizations to build a new parking structure downtown. 10. That this report be forwarded to the April 14, 2014 City Council meeting for consideration.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - MARCH 12, 2014 The Committee adopted a resolution to concur in the recommendation contained in the report after adding the following recommendation. That the Administration explore a partnership with other organizations to build a new parking structure downtown.
Mayor Michael Fougere, Councillors: Sharron Bryce, Bryon Burnett, John Findura, Bob Hawkins, Terry Hincks, Wade Murray, Mike ODonnell and Barbara Young were present during consideration of this report by the Executive Committee.
The Executive Committee, at the PRIVATE session of its meeting held on March 12, 2014, considered the following report from the Administration: RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Downtown Transportation Study (DTS) Phases Two and Three Report as outlined in Appendix A be APPROVED and the Administration be directed to incorporate the specific initiatives in the DTS as outlined in Appendix B into the appropriate work plans as budget and resources permit. 2. That, recognizing that 11th Avenue is a major destination for transit customers, Regina Transit buses continue to serve stops on 11th Avenue and measures be put in place to mitigate the impacts of these transit stops on businesses fronting 11th Avenue, including: Providing adequate transit stop amenities including waste receptacles and attractive shelters to reduce littering and discourage use of building entrances;
-3Relocation of eastbound bus stops from in front of Old City Hall Mall to the block between Lorne Street and Cornwall Street, with modifications to Lorne Street to ensure appropriate turning movements can be provided; Design of a dual street transit hub that includes Lorne Street between 11th and 12th Avenues, reducing the number of transfers on 11th Avenue; Expanding existing security patrols over the entire business day on 11th Avenue between Cornwall Street and Hamilton Street; Adjusting schedules and timing points of transit routes to minimize layover time on 11th Avenue; Reviewing ridership patterns and adjusting bus route assignments to stops to reflect available sidewalk space; and, Undertaking a passenger education and awareness program to discourage loitering in private buildings and littering.
3. That $200,000 in funding be allocated from the General Fund Reserve for the enhanced security patrol, transit stop amenities, increasing transit activities on Lorne Street and the relocation of bus stops from in front of Old City Hall and that opportunities for supplemental or shared funding from Regina Downtown Business Improvement District (RDBID) and others be explored. 4. That a downtown transit shuttle service, to replace regular transit services is not feasible at this time, but that the City of Regina retain the concept as a long-term option to support redevelopment and connect the downtown with the new stadium, the Regina Revitalization Initiative (RRI), and the Warehouse District.
5. That the recommended plan for additional cycling facilities on downtown streets as identified in the DTS be included in the City-wide Transportation Master Plan. 6. That Administration be directed to establish a Downtown Transportation Working group to provide open channels of communication to address emergent issues related to downtown transportation and that this working group include representation from RDBID, Regina Transit, City Operations, and the Accessibility Advisory Committee. 7. That strategies for the management and supply of parking in the downtown be finalized through the Downtown and Vicinity Parking Study. 8. That item MN13-4 Downtown Transit Shuttle Service be removed from the List of Outstanding Items for City Council. 9. That this report be forwarded to the April 14, 2014 City Council meeting for consideration. CONCLUSION Downtown Regina is going through change. Several new developments have been completed and more are planned. While this is the sign of a successful, growing City, it comes with challenges with respect to meeting transportation demands. Since road capacity is essentially fixed, it is critical that opportunities to promote walking, cycling, transit and ride-sharing to and from the downtown be maximized. At the same time, it is important to recognize that
-4maintaining access and parking for automobiles and delivery vehicles is vital for businesses. Accordingly, the Downtown Transportation Study recommends a suite of short, medium and long term improvements to facilitate multi-modal travel options in the downtown and surrounding area. Transit is particularly critical to the downtown. On a typical weekday, over 6,000 people use transit to get to/from or around downtown, and this figure is growing. In the month of October, city-wide transit ridership had increased by 13.8% as compared to the same time last year (2012). This is after changes to routes and schedules were made in July 2013. These increases were achieved without increasing service levels but instead tailoring routes to better meet customer demands. Notwithstanding the recent successes of transit, there are still many issues that exist due to the number of buses and passengers in a small area. These include lane interruptions on 11th Avenue, sight-line issues at driveways and alleyways, crowding on sidewalks and use of private lobbies by transit passengers. Most of these impacts can be mitigated by providing adequate shelters and amenities and through further changes to the route structure to reduce the number of express buses using 11th Avenue. Various options for further reducing or eliminating buses from 11th Avenue were examined, including options involving shuttle buses. One of the major challenges with moving buses or stops off 11th Avenue is that the impacts are simply transferred to other streets. Introducing a shuttle service could facilitate the removal of some buses off 11th Avenue, but the net cost to provide this service is estimated at $550,000 annually plus start-up costs. The preferred option is to increase service on express routes and continue the transition to a multi-node system. Over time, more transfers will occur outside the downtown core and at nodes in the periphery of the city. Additionally, a future downtown transit terminal could alleviate some of the current concerns about transit. While continued service on 11th Avenue is recommended, there remains interest from adjacent businesses in relocating transit to other streets. Should transit service on 11th Avenue be relocated, additional review would be required in order to ensure the costs and impacts of the new routes and stops are appropriately identified and managed. BACKGROUND Upon the completion of the City Square Plaza, City Council directed the Administration to review options for managing traffic not just on City Square Plaza, but throughout the downtown. The Downtown Transportation Study (DTS) was initially commissioned in response to Councils direction. The study area for the DTS is shown in Appendix A. Phase One of the DTS specifically examined challenges facing all users on 11th and 12th Avenues and identified options to improve the transportation system on these corridors. It also considered the future nature of traffic access to City Square Plaza. Recommendations from Phase One of the DTS were approved by City Council on July 23, 2012 and were implemented in 2012 and 2013.
-5Phases Two and Three of the DTS considered transportation options throughout the broader downtown, including traffic movement, transit services, and cyclist and pedestrian accommodation. The Phase Two study area considered all streets as far south as 13th Avenue. Consultant efficiencies also allowed for the completion of Phase Three without additional funding, which considered all streets as far south as College Avenue. Additional work was included in the contract during the summer of 2013 to further explore options for transit operations in the downtown, including the feasibility of a shuttle service within the area. This report is located in Appendix C. All phases of the DTS, including the additional transit review, are now complete. In addition, Council instructed the Administration to review traffic operations on City Square Plaza and 11th Avenue on an annual basis. The results of that review are included in this report. DISCUSSION The DTS identified a number of issues and potential solutions for improving transportation in the downtown, which are discussed subsequently. Improvements and future studies would be done in collaboration with the City departments responsible for Traffic Operations, Open Space Management, Transit Services, Transportation Planning, Parking and Roadway Preservation. In addition, the RDBID and other stakeholders will be a part of achieving the proposed implementation plan included in Appendix B to this report. Intersection Operations The DTS included the modelling of traffic flows from Saskatchewan Drive to College Avenue and Osler Street to Angus Street. Overall, traffic volumes are acceptable within those boundaries, although individual movements may be delayed by the presence of a turning vehicle or pedestrians. Most intersections on the boundary arterial roads, however, experience capacity and delay problems, with failing movements being observed at: Saskatchewan Drive and Albert Street, eastbound left-turn movement; Saskatchewan Drive and Broad Street, all left-turn movements other than the northbound direction; 11th Avenue and Albert Street, westbound left-turn and through movements; Victoria Avenue and Broad Street, southbound left-turn movement and northbound through and right-turn movements; and, Broad Street and 13th Avenue, southbound left-turn movement.
To address these issues, the following improvements are proposed: Location Saskatchewan Drive & Albert Street Proposed Improvement Widen Saskatchewan Drive to create an additional westbound lane from Lorne Street, becoming a right turn lane at Albert Street Convert the middle southbound through-lane on Albert Street to a shared through-left turn lane becomes double left turn at peak times Extend the westbound left turn lane to McInytre Street Remove the right turn channels to improve pedestrian safety and install audible pedestrian signals Provide a shared through-left turn lane on eastbound Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan Drive
-6& Broad Street 11th Avenue & Broad Street 12th Avenue & Broad Street Roadway Alternatives There are limited opportunities to expand roadway network capacity in the downtown. Outside of peak hours, downtown roadways generally operate with free-flow conditions. Therefore, alternatives explored as part of the DTS focused on options that could improve access while contributing to more comfortable and safe environments for pedestrians and cyclists. Conversion of one-way streets to two-way operation has the potential to improve circulation and routing options, reduce out-of-way travel, and slow traffic. However, the potential for two-way streets to impact options for parking and bike routes must be considered. It is also recognized that the discussion of two-way streets is controversial given the lingering concerns about the conversions of 11th Avenue and 12th Avenue. For Phase Two, traffic modelling was undertaken to examine if there would be merit in considering the conversion of Hamilton Street and Rose Street to two-way. A scenario involving the conversion of 11th Avenue back to one-way was also examined at the request of the RDBID, but was shown to have significant negative impacts on traffic movement. Based on past studies, 13th Avenue was identified as a candidate for two-way conversion and examined as part of Phase Three. Lorne Street, Smith Street, 14th Avenue and 15th Avenue were also identified as potential candidates, but it was determined that two-way operations on these streets would preclude the extension of bike facilities and provide no significant enhancement to traffic movement. Based on the traffic modelling, it was shown that there would be little or no increases in traffic delays as a result of the conversion of 13th Avenue to two-way, but overall travel distances would decrease as a result of more direct travel routings. The following three streets are considered candidates for two-way conversion: Hamilton Street between Saskatchewan Drive and Victoria Avenue (and potentially south to College Avenue); Rose Street between Saskatchewan Drive and Victoria Avenue (and potentially south to College Avenue); and, 13th Avenue between Albert Street and Broad Street. Drive during peak times; extend existing left turn lane by ~10 metres Provide a shared through-left turn lane on southbound Broad Street during peak times Realign northbound and westbound left turns, and provide westbound left turn arrow during PM peak hour Provide a new eastbound right-turn lane Make the southbound curb extension permanent to facilitate southbound right-turn bus movements New eastbound right-turn lane plus an advanced eastbound left turn
-7Two-way conversion is recommended for 13 Avenue in the medium term, while further study of conversion is recommended for Hamilton Street and Rose Street. Prior to finalizing the decision on the feasibility and timing of these conversions, conceptual designs will need to be prepared and presented to area residents. It will also be necessary to confirm the preferred eastwest cycling route or routes through the City-wide Transportation Master Plan. The potential opening of F.W. Hill Mall to vehicular traffic and parking was also discussed with stakeholders and there was general interest in redeveloping Scarth Street between Victoria Avenue and 11th Avenue to provide for wider sidewalks and patio spaces, parking and northbound traffic circulation. This project is complex and will require a scoping study in a future budget year. Parking The DTS was integrated with the Downtown and Vicinity Parking Study to ensure both projects were compatible with respect to parking issues in the area. The Downtown and Vicinity Parking Study is nearing completion and its results will be presented to City Council in the summer of 2014. Pedestrians Pedestrians are among the key defining characteristics of Reginas downtown and the surrounding neighbourhoods. Virtually all trips in downtown Regina include a pedestrian component, connecting destinations to transit stops, parkades, and other destinations. Recent and planned growth in residential population in the vicinity of downtown will also increase pedestrian trips. Providing walkable and pedestrian-oriented environments is essential to downtown Regina, as reinforced in the title of the Downtown Neighbourhood Plan, Walk to Work. The F.W. Hill Mall on Scarth Street and City Square Plaza both represent attempts to increase the pedestrian priority downtown. Improvements in recent years, such as the rebuilding of sidewalks on Albert Street and Lorne Street, are providing examples of how the downtowns pedestrian environments can be improved. However, many of the challenges relating to pedestrians and walkability downtown are smaller in scale and the Downtown Transportation Study identifies some of these emergent issues, including: Built condition of sidewalks throughout most of the downtown, including deterioration and uneven surfaces; Winter maintenance and inconsistent snow clearing of sidewalks; Outdated accessibility standards, particularly for curb ramp designs; Difficulty of crossing and safety along major arterials that border the downtown, particularly Saskatchewan Drive, Albert Street, and Broad Street; Conditions through the Albert Street and Broad Street underpasses; Minimal streetscaping and weather protection; and, Lack of wayfinding and awareness of walking distances in downtown.
th
-8Identifying 11th Avenue, Victoria Avenue, and Cornwall Street as key pedestrian corridors in downtown on which to prioritize streetscape improvements, greening and other pedestrian amenities; Improving pedestrian environments along arterial streets such as Albert Street and Broad Street through sidewalk reconstruction, creation of boulevards where space permits to serve as buffers, and improved intersection and crosswalk treatments; Reconstructing and extending the sidewalk on the north side of Saskatchewan Drive to provide a continuous walkway between Albert Street and Broad Street and improving pedestrian crossing opportunities at the Cornwall Centre Parkade access and other locations on this street; Installing a curb extension and high visibility crosswalk at the intersection of Victoria Avenue and Cornwall Street; Addressing conditions under Albert Street and Broad Street underpasses through improved lighting, widening where possible, and potential integration of public art; Adopting a new standard for accessible sidewalk design and curb ramps with consultation with accessibility groups; Improving snow clearing on sidewalks under city jurisdiction and increasing enforcement on private properties, exploring implementation of municipal snow clearance on sidewalks within the downtown; Continuing to install pedestrian countdown signals and accessible pedestrian signals throughout the downtown; Developing a pedestrian signage and wayfinding strategy for downtown and surrounding areas; Adopting a standard design for tree pits and plantings with guidance on alternative plantings or streetscaping where tree growth conditions are not optimal; and, Dedicating additional funding and resources to sidewalk maintenance.
Cycling Phase Two of the DTS also looked at how to improve conditions to support cycling in the downtown for both commuter and recreational travel. Utility cycling cycling to travel from point A to point B is increasing in urban areas around the country, even in cities with harsh winter climates. The potential for cycling in Regina is significant, particularly to the downtown, where most of the city is within a 30-minute bike ride, which is competitive with driving times in peak periods. Making cycling safer and more attractive can significantly increase cycling mode share. Several barriers to cycling in Regina were identified through the DTS and parallel activities in the Transportation Master Plan: Lack of cycling infrastructure to provide safe routes for cycling, particularly on-street bike lanes; Conditions for cycling within the Albert and Broad Street underpasses; Minimal provision of short and long-term bicycle parking in the downtown; and, Lack of awareness of how cycling and other road users co-exist on roadways.
Creating the conditions to encourage cycling can be a cost-effective means to improve access to downtown Regina. Cycling commuters are also more likely to use transit, own fewer cars, and have reduced transportation costs. The key measures recommended as part of the DTS related to cycling include:
-9Extension of existing Lorne Street bike lane from Victoria Avenue to 11th Avenue; Implementation of a 12th Avenue bikeway to provide east-west connectivity through downtown Regina and to adjacent neighbourhoods; Exploring potential of an east-west bikeway between Victoria Avenue and College Avenue using 14th Avenue and 15th Avenue as one-way bicycle couplets; Improving signage for cyclists and pedestrians on the shared walkway at the Broad Street underpass; Implementing signage and road marking improvements at the intersections of Broad Street with Dewdney Avenue and Saskatchewan Drive to direct cyclists to the shared walkway; Expanding on-street short-term bicycle parking throughout downtown focused at major destinations and along retail streets; Expanding and increasing awareness of off-street long-term bicycle parking options within parkades and integrated within development; Encouraging end-of-trip bicycle facilities, such as change and locker rooms, in new developments; and, Developing awareness and education programs for all road users to promote safe cycling throughout the city and to downtown.
Transit Transit is critical to the downtown. On a typical weekday, over 6,000 people utilize transit to get to, from and around downtown and this figure is growing. In the month of October, city-wide transit ridership had increased by 13.8% as compared to the same time last year (2012). This is after changes to routes and schedules were made in July 2013. These increases were achieved without increasing service levels but instead tailoring routes to customer demands. A side benefit of the recent changes to the transit system has been the reduction of peak hour bus volumes on 11th Avenue by 17%. The bus stops on 11th Avenue at Cornwall Centre continue to be the busiest in the city and half of the passenger boarding activity is not from transfer activity, but workers, residents, and shoppers from nearby destinations. Notwithstanding the recent successes of transit, there are still many issues that exist due to the number of buses and passengers in a small area. 11th Avenue is a constrained corridor with the need for multiple uses to co-exist, including businesses, pedestrian, transit vehicles and customers, automobile traffic, and deliveries. Some of the issues related to transit include: Lane interruptions on 11th Avenue; Concerns regarding idling buses; Sight-line issues at driveways and alleyways; Crowding on sidewalks; Littering; Safety and security concerns; and, Use of private building entrances by transit passengers.
Various options for further reducing or eliminating buses from 11th Avenue were examined, including routing options on Victoria Avenue, Lorne Street, and Saskatchewan Drive, as well as the elimination of full-sized buses from within the downtown in favour of a shuttle service. Other locations for the transfer nodes were also examined. One of the major challenges with moving buses or stops off 11th Avenue is that the traffic and business impacts are simply transferred to other streets. Full relocation of operations to boundary streets or to north-south
- 10 streets within the downtown would also require structural improvements, changes to traffic controls and signals, and rescheduling of transit routes and stops. The following table provides information on the results of this review.
Alternative 1: 11th Avenue (existing) Alternative 2: New Transit Corridor on Lorne Street and Victoria Avenue GOOD Accommodated at intersection of 11th Avenue and Lorne Street GOOD Increases service to south end of downtown with added service on Victoria Avenue FAIR Routes split between two corridors, but on same corridor in both directions GOOD Greater capacity to handle service increases with two corridors FAIR Available capacity on Lorne Street but increased congestion on Victoria Avenue FAIR Increased transit travel time versus 11th Avenue FAIR Fewer businesses impacted on Lorne Street; concerns on Victoria Avenue Alternative 3: Eastbound on Saskatchewan Drive, Westbound on 11th Avenue POOR No central location, customers must walk from Sask. Drive to 11th Ave. POOR Increases walking distance to EB transit from south end of downtown FAIR All EB on Sask. Drive, all WB on 11th avenue FAIR May require additional priority due to congestion (all-day bus lanes) POOR Saskatchewan Drive experiences high levels of congestion Alternative 4: Transit Shuttle Service
GOOD Accommodated on 11th Avenue at Cornwall Street GOOD Most downtown locations well served
Proximity to Destinations
POOR No central location, customers must walk or transfer to shuttle GOOD Most downtown locations well served
Route/System Understandability
GOOD All routes service same corridor in both directions FAIR May require additional priority (all-day bus lanes) FAIR Congestion at intersections is of short duration
POOR Increased complexity for riders FAIR Shuttles must contend with growing traffic within the downtown FAIR Congestion on arterial streets
Traffic impacts
Transit delay
GOOD Transit operations served well POOR Challenges with access, transit patrons in private buildings on important retail street
POOR High volumes on Saskatchewan Drive create delay FAIR Businesses on north side of 11th Avenue impacted; loading areas on Saskatchewan Drive impacted
POOR Shuttles navigate circuitously through downtown resulting POOR Impacts on businesses on arterial roads and at many shuttle stop locations
The transit shuttle option explored at the direction of City Council warrants further consideration. This option involves the introduction of a free downtown shuttle service to replace bus services on 11th Avenue. At this time, it is not recommended for the following reasons: It would increase bus volumes on Victoria Avenue and Saskatchewan Drive and additional turning movements would exacerbate congestion at major intersections on Albert and Broad Streets;
- 11 It requires the removal of multiple on-street parking stalls on all blocks where the shuttle service stops; The relative walking distance and time, compared to travel time on the shuttle, makes the service unattractive to transit customers; and, Operating costs for a service operating every five minutes during peak times is estimated at approximately $550,000 per year, with start-up capital costs ranging from $665,000 to $3.6 million.
A downtown shuttle service is not recommended at this time, particularly as a means to replace regular transit service on 11th Avenue. A circulator shuttle to complement existing transit services may be desirable in the future to connect the downtown with the RRI and the Warehouse District. Full or partial private sponsorship of the shuttle service may be an option should it prove feasible for transit and traffic operations in the future. Based on the results of the review and observed ridership patterns and transit customer preference, it is recommended that transit service on 11th Avenue be maintained for the time being. It is recognized, however, that the concerns raised on 11th Avenue must be addressed. It is recommended that the following mitigating measures be implemented immediately: Providing adequate transit stop amenities including waste receptacles and attractive shelters to reduce littering and discourage use of building entrances; Relocation of eastbound bus stops from in front of Old City Hall Mall to the block between Lorne Street and Cornwall Street, with modifications to Lorne Street to ensure appropriate turning movements can be provided; Relocating some transfers from 11th Avenue to Lorne Street and exploring the role the Cityowned lot at the corner of 11th Avenue and Lorne Street could play in the transit system; Expanding existing security patrols over the entire business day on 11th Avenue between Cornwall Street and Hamilton Street; Adjusting schedules and timing points of transit routes to minimize layover time on 11th Avenue; Reviewing ridership patterns and adjusting bus route assignments to stops to reflect available sidewalk space; and, Undertaking a passenger education and awareness program to discourage loitering in private buildings and littering.
Regina Transit plans to continue implementation of its Transit Investment Plan, which, with further investment in transit, will increase service on express routes and continue the transition to a multi-node system as identified as part of the city-wide Transportation Master Plan. Over time, more transfers will occur outside the downtown core and at nodes in the periphery of the city. It is also recommended that the City pursue the development of a downtown transit terminal for implementation in the medium to long term. The Downtown Transportation Study determined that the existing City-owned property on the southwest corner of Lorne Street and 11th Avenue is not appropriate for an off-street terminal due to the size of the parcel and impacts of buses turning movements on traffic flow and pedestrian safety on 11th Avenue. This conclusion could change if additional property could be acquired. A feasibility study would be more appropriate to identify opportunities for partnerships with new development or potential sites for acquisition.
- 12 Universal Design and Accessibility Key overarching strategies under the section on pedestrians include creating an attractive pedestrian environment, and improving sidewalk maintenance. Each of these strategies includes a number of actions that will serve to improve accessibility. Key actions include adopting a new standard for accessible sidewalk design, including the requirement for even and level walking surfaces, level sidewalks at driveways/alleyways, and adopting a new standard for accessible cross-walk design. Reviewing, updating and adopting these new standards is identified as a priority by the Accessibility Advisory Committee. In addition, the plan recommends the continued installation of pedestrian count-down signals and audible signals as covered by existing programs. Maintaining transit on 11th Avenue is also important to minimize walking distances for people with mobility challenges. Other Considerations There are many on-going initiatives in the City which will have an impact on downtown transportation including the Regina Revitalization Initiative, the Transportation Master Plan, the Downtown and Vicinity Parking Study and downtown development in general. The DTS provides an overall framework and recommendations to improve transportation in the downtown while contributing to broader City-building objectives. It should be reviewed and updated regularly to account for changing conditions. Review of Phase One Results As part of the approval of Phase One of the DTS, City Council directed the Administration to review traffic operations on City Square Plaza and 11th Avenue on an annual basis. That review was recently completed with the following results: Traffic operations on the plaza are generally working well. Volumes and speeds appear to be low and drivers are yielding to pedestrians and other active users; Some drivers still appear to be confused about how to turn at Cornwall Street. Additional bollards have been added to help with traffic guidance; A total of six Requests for Service (RFS) were received since the plaza was opened relating to traffic operations and drivers not following roadway guidelines. There have been a few safety problems associated with the introduction of traffic to the plaza. Regina Police Service notes two reported incidents since the plaza was opened, both of which were minor in nature. One involved only property damage and a second involved a pedestrian jumping into traffic and being struck by a vehicle resulting in minor injuries; and, Increased traffic in the downtown and changes to transit operations necessitated a review of traffic operations on 11th Avenue. As a result of this review, modifications to traffic and parking restrictions will be made to permit vehicles to utilized the curb lanes during peak hours, thereby avoiding back-ups due to left turning vehicles in the inside lanes. Eastbound left turn arrows at the intersections of 11th Avenue and Hamilton Street, Cornwall Street and Smith Street have also been added.
- 13 RECOMMENDATION IMPLICATIONS Financial Implications The cost of implementing all of the proposed improvements recommended in this report and listed in the implementation plan in Appendix B is estimated at $8,005,000 in todays dollars. Funding of these projects will be subject to the capital budget approval process. Currently, projects in the downtown are only eligible for limited funding through servicing agreement fees (SAF), with utility and general capital budgets funding most of the cost of improvements. SAF are also not charged in the area. The recently approved Official Community Plan included significant intensification in the centre of the City. This approach to growth, along with the recently completed Downtown Serviceability Study and DTS, will be inputs into a comprehensive review of development charges the Administration will be undertaking in 2014. The review is expected to provide funding options to support the redevelopment of existing areas of the City, including its downtown. Environmental Implications The DTS identifies improvements to encourage greater use of walking, cycling and transit modes for travel to and from the downtown. This will reduce the amount of fuel consumed for transportation and in turn, assist in reducing the Citys carbon footprint. Policy and/or Strategic Implications The overall strategy to maximize the capacity of the existing road network while planning for an increased role for public transit supports the goals of the Official Community Plan and the Downtown Neighbourhood Plan. In particular, the measures identified in the DTS support the community priority to create better, more active ways of getting around. Some of the policies and actions in the DTS, in particular those related to walking and cycling improvements, will need to be confirmed, expanded on and incorporated into the City-wide Transportation Master Plan which is on-going and expected to be completed in early 2014. Other Implications The traffic, transit and streetscaping improvements identified in the DTS for 11th Avenue can be incorporated within the existing streetscape with minimal disruption to traffic. However, 11th Avenue will most likely require a full re-build from building face to building face within the next 10 years. This will have impacts on traffic flow within the downtown and will require significant advance planning.
- 14 Accessibility Implications Since accessibility is an overarching goal to be achieved in all aspects of transportation planning, Phase Two of the DTS integrates recommendations to improve universal accessibility and design into the recommendations for each mode. The recommendations are designed to improve accessibility throughout the downtown. Specific recommendations to develop new standards for accessible sidewalks and cross-walks will require input from the Accessibility Advisory Committee and numerous departments. COMMUNICATIONS Phase One of the DTS included three public open houses and meetings with stakeholders including RDBID, emergency service providers, transit officials, management at Cornwall Centre, the owners and tenants of buildings adjacent to City Square Plaza, the Accessibility Advisory Committee, the blind and low vision community, and the Regina Chamber of Commerce. Phase Two and Phase Three consultation consisted of meetings with specific stakeholder groups. A meeting and walk-about was held with the blind and low vision community representatives on September 13, 2012 prior to the opening of City Square Plaza to traffic. This meeting was useful in identifying challenges beyond the Plaza. One of the requests from the representatives at this meeting was to be given more advance notice of changes in streetscape or traffic control in the downtown prior to implementation. Three meetings were held with members of RDBID throughout Phase Two and Three. The first meeting, held on March 15, 2013 included a presentation on transit routing alternatives. During this meeting representatives expressed a desire to look at options to reduce the number of buses on 11th Avenue, but also recognized the importance of transit to the downtown. A second meeting was held on June 26, 2013 to discuss options to consolidate stops on 11th Avenue as part of the transit route restructuring plan. During this meeting concerns were raised by specific property owners about the location of bus stops and the impacts of waiting passengers. A third meeting was held on August 26, 2013 to present interim findings on the transit shuttle feasibility study, including reviews of experiences in other cities. Concerns around bus stops and transfer points on 11th Avenue were further articulated at this meeting. An additional meeting was held with RDBID on February 28, 2014 to share the results of the study. At this meeting, RDBID expressed general support for the findings, especially moving more transit activities west on 11th Avenue and onto Lorne Street. The DTS was also guided by a Steering Committee and Technical Team. The Steering Committee include representation from RDBID, who in turn, provided study updates to members through regular communications.
- 15 DELEGATED AUTHORITY This report will require City Council approval. Respectfully submitted, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Final Report
IBI GROUP REGINA DOW NTOWN TRANSPORTATION STUDY PHASE TW O AND THREE REPORT: DIRECTIONS FOR DOW NTOW N TRANSPORTATION Prepared for City of Regina
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 1.2 2 Study Objectives ...................................................................................................... 2 Report Overview ...................................................................................................... 3
Key Issues and Future Conditions ................................................................................... 4 2.1 2.2 2.3 Key Issues from Phase One .................................................................................... 4 Downtown Neighbourhood Plan Needs................................................................... 5 Future Conditions..................................................................................................... 6
Downtown Transportation Directions .............................................................................. 9 3.1 3.2 Design Regina and the Transportation Master Plan................................................ 9 Downtown Transportation Directions:...................................................................... 9
Transit ................................................................................................................................ 11 4.1 4.2 4.3 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................ 11 Key Strategies for Transit ...................................................................................... 12 Action Plan ............................................................................................................. 15
Pedestrians ....................................................................................................................... 16 5.1 5.2 5.3 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................ 16 Key Strategies........................................................................................................ 18 Action Plan ............................................................................................................. 27
Cycling ............................................................................................................................... 28 6.1 6.2 6.3 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................ 28 Key Strategies........................................................................................................ 29 Action Plan ............................................................................................................. 35
Traffic and Roads ............................................................................................................. 36 7.1 7.2 7.3 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................ 36 Key Strategies........................................................................................................ 36 Action Plan ............................................................................................................. 41
FEBRUARY 2014
IBI GROUP REGINA DOW NTOWN TRANSPORTATION STUDY PHASE TW O AND THREE REPORT: DIRECTIONS FOR DOW NTOW N TRANSPORTATION Prepared for City of Regina
LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1.1: Study Area ................................................................................................................... 2 Exhibit 2.1: Recent and proposed developments ........................................................................... 7 Exhibit 2.2: Approaches to allocating road space........................................................................... 8 Exhibit 4.1: Summary actions for transit improvements................................................................ 15 Exhibit 5.1: Broad Street underpass conditions for pedestrians................................................... 16 Exhibit 5.2: Narrow sidewalk at arterial intersection and along arterial roadway ......................... 17 Exhibit 5.3: Examples of sidewalk degradation in downtown Regina........................................... 17 Exhibit 5.4: Current curb ramp design .......................................................................................... 18 Exhibit 5.5: Example streetscape enhancements suitable for narrow sidewalks (e.g., 11th Avenue).................................................................................................................. 19 Exhibit 5.6: Accessible curb ramp design (Source: Federal Highway Administration) ................. 20 Exhibit 5.7: Pedestrian count-down light....................................................................................... 21 Exhibit 5.8: Priority intersections for audible pedestrian signal installation .................................. 22 Exhibit 5.9: High visibility crosswalk.............................................................................................. 23 Exhibit 5.10: Curb extension ......................................................................................................... 23 Exhibit 5.11: Examples of way-finding pillars................................................................................ 25 Exhibit 5.12: Example of pedestrian-oriented signage ................................................................. 26 Exhibit 5.13: Rendering of pedestrian-oriented street signage for Regina ................................... 26 Exhibit 5.14: Summary actions for pedestrian improvements ...................................................... 27 Exhibit 6.1: Broad Street underpass allowing cyclists to ride on the sidewalk ............................. 29 Exhibit 6.2: Example section of Lorne Street looking north, between Victoria Avenue and th 11 Avenue ............................................................................................................ 30 Exhibit 6.3: Example section of 12th Avenue looking east, between Hamilton Street and Rose Street ............................................................................................................ 31 Exhibit 6.4: Examples of on-street bike racks............................................................................... 32
FEBRUARY 2014
IBI GROUP REGINA DOW NTOWN TRANSPORTATION STUDY PHASE TW O AND THREE REPORT: DIRECTIONS FOR DOW NTOW N TRANSPORTATION Prepared for City of Regina
FEBRUARY 2014
IBI GROUP REGINA DOW NTOWN TRANSPORTATION STUDY PHASE TW O AND THREE REPORT: DIRECTIONS FOR DOW NTOW N TRANSPORTATION Prepared for City of Regina
Introduction
The Downtown Transportation Study (DTS) was initiated by the City of Regina in November 2011 to analyze and propose alternatives to a number of transportation issues in Reginas downtown (see Exhibit 1.1). The study was completed in three phases as follows: Phase One focused on operations of 11th Avenue and 12th Avenue through downtown Regina, including providing a preferred operational plan for City Square Plaza; Phase Two expanded the study area north to Saskatchewan Drive, south to 13th Avenue, west to Angus Street, and east to Osler Street, addressing transportation issues for all modes and providing recommendations for transportation policy and operational changes; and, Phase Three expanded the study area to the entire downtown, southward to College Avenue.
This report presents the findings and recommendations from Phase Two and Three of the Downtown Transportation Study. A brief summary of the key issues from Phase One is also provided.
FEBRUARY 2014
IBI GROUP REGINA DOW NTOWN TRANSPORTATION STUDY PHASE TW O AND THREE REPORT: DIRECTIONS FOR DOW NTOW N TRANSPORTATION Prepared for City of Regina
1.1
Study Objectives
The Downtown Transportation Study is an opportunity to assess Reginas transportation system and improve the way the city travels to, from, and within its downtown. An efficient transportation network is a key to the downtowns existing and future vitality and growth.
FEBRUARY 2014
IBI GROUP REGINA DOW NTOWN TRANSPORTATION STUDY PHASE TW O AND THREE REPORT: DIRECTIONS FOR DOW NTOW N TRANSPORTATION Prepared for City of Regina
The overall objective of the Study is to identify and evaluate options to improve conditions for all users including pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders, automobiles and delivery vehicles. Phase One of the DTS examined the key operational challenges and opportunities for the 11th and 12th Avenue corridors and whether or not to make the closure to vehicles on City Square plaza permanent. Many of the short term recommendations from the Phase One study have now been implemented, including the opening of City Square Plaza to westbound traffic. Phase Two and Three are intended to expand on the work completed in Phase One and reach a consensus that will best achieve the vision laid out in the Downtown Neighbourhood Planthat is: a seamless, supportive transportation network that benefits all modes. Phase Two and Phase Three also included the expansion of the downtown traffic models and subsequent use of these models to test different network scenarios. The analysis related to the expansion of these models is documented in a separate technical background report. Recommendations from Phase Two and Three address issues related to transit, mitigating downtown-wide traffic issues, and identifying improvements for pedestrians and cyclists. During the completion of the Phase Two and Three studies, additional work was requested to further explore options for transit operations in the Downtown, including evaluating the feasibility of a shuttle service within the area. This analysis is presented as part of the Directions for Transit in Downtown Regina report in Appendix A.
1.2
Report Overview
The body of this report provides high level findings, analysis, and a package of recommended traffic, transit, cycling, and pedestrian measures for the downtown. Detailed and technical analyses are attached as appendices to this report. Section 1: Introduction provides an overview of the study and study area; Section 2: Key Issues and Future Conditions summarizes findings from Phase One of the DTS and future conditions that may impact transportation in the downtown; Section 3: Downtown Transportation Directions presents overarching transportation directions for the downtown based on past city plans (Downtown Neighbourhood Plan, Official Community Plan, Transportation Master Plan); Sections 4-8 provide an overview of existing conditions and present action plans to address issues related to each mode/issue of transportation including: Transit (Section 4), Pedestrians (Section 5), Cycling (Section 6), Traffic and Road (Section 7) and Parking and Loading (Section 8); Section 9: Implementation and Costing provides estimated costing of the identified strategies and actions.
FEBRUARY 2014
IBI GROUP REGINA DOW NTOWN TRANSPORTATION STUDY PHASE TW O AND THREE REPORT: DIRECTIONS FOR DOW NTOW N TRANSPORTATION Prepared for City of Regina
2
2.1
Phase One of the Downtown Transportation Study identified a number of issues impacting all th modes of transportation in the downtown with those issues relating to City Square Plaza and 11 Avenue, the focus of the Phase One report. The work completed in Phase One provided direction for Phase Two. The following issues were identified to be addressed in Phase Two, and are discussed in more detail in later sections of this report. Traffic: Transit: Cycling: Lack of on-street, short-term bike parking Cyclists using sidewalks on 11 Avenue
th th
Congestion and delay at 12 Avenue and Albert Street Congestion and delay along 11 Avenue due to high bus volumes, vehicle turning movements from shared lanes, and illegal parking during rush hour periods Congestion and delay at the intersection of11 Avenue and Broad Street At 11 Avenue and Scarth Street, operations hindered by no-parking violators and pickup/drop-off activity At 11 Avenue and Cornwall Street, high pedestrian and traffic volumes and poor operations
th th th th
Buses delayed by illegally stopped vehicles in bus lanes in peak periods Buses delayed/slowed by movements around on-street parking and loading in off-peak periods Delayed turning movements at Broad Street and Albert Street Lack of space for transit boarding and exiting on 11 Avenue, and in turn issues relating to waiting passengers and buses blocking alleys and driveways Desire for a central hub for transit in downtown Saskatchewan Drive and Victoria Avenue underutilized as transit corridor Lack of amenities for transit riders and visibility of bus stops
th th
Walking: Canyon effect on 11 Avenue not ideal for pedestrians noise, wind tunnel, lack of light Streetscape on several streets lacks visual interest and is dated Lack of street furniture Lack of wayfinding system Inadequate number of audible pedestrian signals Inconsistent/outdated design of curb ramps throughout downtown Regina Poor condition of sidewalks and road surfaces with negative impact on accessibility
FEBRUARY 2014
IBI GROUP REGINA DOW NTOWN TRANSPORTATION STUDY PHASE TW O AND THREE REPORT: DIRECTIONS FOR DOW NTOW N TRANSPORTATION Prepared for City of Regina