Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Discussion Questions: (Victoria Chemicals A)

    Încărcat de

    burtbert
    1K vizualizări1 pagină
    The document discusses two potential chemical plant projects - Merseyside and Rotterdam. It asks several discussion questions about the projects and how they compare based on Victoria Chemical's investment criteria. Specifically, it asks which project is more attractive based on the criteria, how the projects differ in their rankings, and how the advocacy styles of Elizabeth Eustace and Lucy Morris for their respective projects might impact the final funding decision. It ultimately asks which single project James Fawn should propose to executives to receive funding.

    Descriere originală:

    Victoria Chemicals questions

    Titlu original

    Victoria Chemicals a & B

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formate disponibile

    DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    The document discusses two potential chemical plant projects - Merseyside and Rotterdam. It asks several discussion questions about the projects and how they compare based on Victoria Chemical's investment criteria. Specifically, it asks which project is more attractive based on the criteria, how the projects differ in their rankings, and how the advocacy styles of Elizabeth Eustace and Lucy Morris for their respective projects might impact the final funding decision. It ultimately asks which single project James Fawn should propose to executives to receive funding.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    1K vizualizări1 pagină

    Discussion Questions: (Victoria Chemicals A)

    Încărcat de

    burtbert
    The document discusses two potential chemical plant projects - Merseyside and Rotterdam. It asks several discussion questions about the projects and how they compare based on Victoria Chemical's investment criteria. Specifically, it asks which project is more attractive based on the criteria, how the projects differ in their rankings, and how the advocacy styles of Elizabeth Eustace and Lucy Morris for their respective projects might impact the final funding decision. It ultimately asks which single project James Fawn should propose to executives to receive funding.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 1

    Victoria Chemicals A

    Discussion questions: (Victoria Chemicals A) 1. What change, if any, should Lucy Morris ask Frank Greystock to make in his discounted-cash-flow analysis? Why? What should Morris be prepared to say to the Transport Division, the director of Sales, and her assistant plant manager? Changes to the DCF No recommended changes. The assumption is that the customers will immediately buy 100% of all available product once production resumes. Could possibly have a ramp up period to get back to 100% production. Transport Division -

    2. How attractive is the Merseyside project? By what criteria? 3. Should Morris continue to promote the project for funding? Discussion questions: (Victoria Chemicals B) 1. Why are the Merseyside and Rotterdam projects mutually exclusive? 4. How do the two projects compare on the basis of Victoria Chemicals (VC) investment criteria? What might account for the differences in the rankings? 5. What are the differences in the ways Elizabeth Eustace and Lucy Morris have advocated their respective projects? How might these differences in style affect the outcome of the decision? 6. Which project should James Fawn propose to the chief executive officer and board of directors?

    1.

    S-ar putea să vă placă și