Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1.0
Name Datuk Wira Dr. Abdul Rahman Arshad Challenge Trophy English Language Debate Competition
2.0
Forma 2.1 2.2 2.! A team representing a school consists o ! main debaters and 2 reser"es. The proposition team is kno#n as the A irmati"e or the $o"ernment #hile the opposition team is kno#n as the %egati"e or &pposition. Allocation o time and speaking order' TUR N 1 ! + ) AFFIRMATIVE 1st (peaker 2nd (peaker !rd (peaker Reply (peech 1st - 2nd A irmati"e TUR N 2 * , . NEGATIVE 1st (peaker 2nd (peaker !rd (peaker Reply (peech 1st - 2nd %egati"e TIME ) minutes ) minutes ) minutes * minutes
2.* 2.+
The third debater rom both teams shall not introduce any ne# arguments. Their role is mainly to rebut. While the debater is speaking/ the opposition team can o er 01oint2s3 o 4n ormation5 2 ormal inter6ections3. The debater may accept or decline it. A ter all the debaters ha"e spoken once/ the 1 st or 2nd debater o each side gi"es a reply speech #ith the %egati"e5s Reply (peech being deli"ered irst ollo#ed by the A irmati"e.
1
2.,
!.0
E"#$#%#"# &
!.1
The competition is open to all students rom 7orm 1 to + rom all go"ernment8aided secondary schools under the pur"ie# o the 9inistry o Education/ 9alaysia e:cept residential schools. A school is allo#ed to send only o'e team to participate in the competition. Each team should comprise o 2according to Article 1+!/ The speaking member o the team. student population consists o demographic in that school. at least one ;umiputera student 9alaysian Constitution3 #ho is a E:ceptions should be made i the a particular ethnic group as the
!.2 !.!
!.!.1 4 there is e"idence prior to/ during or a ter the competition contrary to the declared status/ the team #ill be dis<uali ied. !.* E"ery member o a participating team should come rom the (ame school. 27ailure in doing so #ill result in dis<uali ication3
).0
A*+,*#-a #o' *.1 A panel o at least ! or + ad6udicators #ill be appointed or all the rounds at all le"els. The inal debate at the national le"el #ill be ad6udicated by a panel o + ad6udicators/ appointed by the Di"ision o Co8curriculum and Arts/ 9inistry o Education. E./er#e'-e* ad6udicators should be appointed and brie ed on the rules o ad6udication at least a' 0o,r be ore the debate. Ad6udicators should not ad6udicate the team rom their o#n schools districts - states unless there are no ad6udicators a"ailable. 1oints #ill be allocated according to the scoresheet. The debate #ill be #on by the team #hich scores a ma6ority o "otes rom the ad6udicators on the panel. (cores a#arded by ad6udicators are not to be added together to decide the #inner. A*+,*#-a or( *e-#*e 0e 1#''er o2 0e *e%a e #'*e/e'*e' "&. 4mmediately a ter a debate/ the (peaker #ill collect the result slip rom the Chie Ad6udicator. There should be no discussions among the ad6udicators #hen deciding the #inner o the debate. &nce the scoresheets ha"e been handed in/ the ad6udicators shall meet and con er to decide on the ;est Debater. They shall re er to the ad6udicators5 comment sheets to decide on the #inner.
2
*.,
*..
*.)
*.=
1ri>es *.=.1 1la<ues and certi icates o achie"ement #ill be a#arded to the #inning teams. *.=.2 Certi icates o participation #ill be a#arded to all participating teams.
3.0
Pro-e*,re o2 De%a e +.1 The Debate 1rocess +.1.1 The debate topics #ill be gi"en to the competing teams 2 #eeks be ore the competition. +.1.2 The teams #ill dra# the stand &%E hour be ore a debate commences. +.1.! The dra# should take place as scheduled. +.1.* Any team that is late #ould ha"e to in orm the or$a'#(er( #ithin + minutes o the scheduled time/ ailure o #hich/ the team already present #ill be allo#ed to dra# and <uarantine time #ill commence. A grace period o not more than !? minutes #ill be gi"en to the team that is late a ter #hich <uarantine time commences. +.1.+ A team #hich is late 2more than + minutes #ithout in ormation on their #hereabouts3 #ould automatically take on the other position contrary to #hat the team already present has dra#n. The time or <uarantine commences. +.1., The team #ill then be <uarantined in their <uarantine rooms or &%E hour to prepare or the debate. The <uarantine o icers must be in the room #ith the team. +.1.. &nly the team members competing 2! main debaters and 2 reser"es3 #ill be allo#ed in the <uarantine room. The team members should not be in contact #ith any unauthori>ed personnel. +.1.) The team is allo#ed to use their o#n printed re erence materials in the <uarantine room. %o electronic gadgets are allo#ed. +.1.= Teams are re<uired to be seated at the debate "enue2s3 + minutes be ore the debate commences.
!
+.1.1? 4 any one team ails to sho# up + minutes a ter the <uarantine time/ the team #ill be dis<uali ied. A #alk o"er #ill be a#arded to the team that is present. +.1.11 9arks #ill be deducted ,'*er ( ra e$& i there is prompting rom any indi"idual other than the debaters during the <uarantine time and the debate competition. +.2 The Role o the Chairperson - (peaker +.2.1 Each team #ill be chaired by a Chairperson #ho #ill be addressed as 9r. (peaker or 9adam (peaker. +.2.2 The (peaker is responsible or the smooth running o the debate. +.2.! The (peaker #ill read out the rules o the debate and then proceed to introduce the timekeeper/ ad6udicators and debaters. +.2.* The (peaker m,( re rain rom making any comments concerning the debate or debaters during the debate. +.2.+ The (peaker must ensure that the ad6udicators be gi"en enough time to ill in their marks and #ait or the signal rom the Chie Ad6udicator be ore the ne:t debater is called. +.! The Role o the Timekeeper +.!.1 The Timekeeper must ensure that each debater is gi"en ) minutes to deli"er his or her speech. +.!.2 The Timekeeper #ill ring the bell once a ter the 1 st minute and at the end o the .th minute to signal the time allocated or 1oints o 4n ormation. At the end o the ) th minute/ the bell #ill be rung t#ice. 21lacards may be used by the timekeeper to indicate the remaining time le t/ at inter"als o one minute.3 +.!.! A ma:imum time o ! minutes #ill be gi"en to both teams to prepare or the Reply (peech. +.!.* During the Reply (peech/ the Timekeeper #ill ring the bell once at the !rd minute to signal that the debater has 1 minute le t. At the end o the *th minute/ the bell #ill be rung t#ice to signal the end o the debate.
*
4.0
,.1
A 1oint o 4n ormation is a ormal inter6ection. 4t can be' i. ii. iii. i". a <uestion a remark a clari ication a correction o #ord2s3 or statement2s3.
,.2
A 1oint o 4n ormation may be o ered by a member o the opposing team rom the 2nd minute to the .th minute o the time allocated to the debater. 1oints o 4n ormation are not allo#ed during the 1 st and inal minutes o the speech. A bell #ill be rung to signal the beginning and the end o the time allocated or 1oints o 4n ormation. A time limit o 1+ seconds is allo#ed or each 1oint o 4n ormation. There ore/ the 1oints o 4n ormation put orth must be concise. %o heckling or harassment or barracking is allo#ed at any time during the debate. $i"ing and taking 1oints o 4n ormation should be done politely. A debater is re<uired to raise his or her hand and to stand #hen putting orth a 1oint o 4n ormation. Rude/ abusi"e or aggressi"e beha"iour in both instances #ill lead to a re*,- #o' o marks rom the STYLE section. A debater may either accept the 1oint o 4n ormation or decline it. 4 accepted/ the opponent may make a short point or ask a <uestion that deals #ith some issues o the debate 2pre erably one 6ust made by the debater3. A debater MUST gi"e or take at least 2 1oints o 4n ormation during the course o the debate. ,...1 A debater #ho does not o er the minimum number o 1oints o 4n ormation #ill be marked do#n or (@;(TA%CE and (TRATE$A. ,...1.1 ,...1.2 (ubstance or opportunities ailing to take ad"antage o
,.,
,..
(trategy or ailing to understand the role o the debater under this style
,...2 A debater #ho ails to accept any 1oints o 4n ormation #ould be marked do#n or (@;(TA%CE A%D (TRATE$A.
+
,...2.1
,...2.2
(trategy or not understanding the role o the debater under this style or co#ardice in not accepting a challenge
,.) ,.=
%o 1oints o 4n ormation may be o ered during the Reply (peeches. The Eti<uette o presenting 1oints o 4n ormation 21&43 ,.=.1 A 1oint o 4n ormation is o ered by standing and saying B1oint o 4n ormationC or something similar. The debater on the loor is not obliged to accept e"ery point. De or she may ,.=.1.1 ,.=.1.2 ,.=.1.! Ask the interrupter to sit do#n 7inish the sentence and then accept the point Accept the point there and then.
1.?
9arks are a#arded to each debater according to' SUBSTANCE STRATEGY LANGUAGE STYLE
1.1
SUBSTANCE 1.1.1 (ubstance co"ers the arguments that are used and are di"orced rom the speaking style. 4t is as i you are seeing the arguments #ritten do#n rather than spoken. Aou must assess the #eight o the arguments #ithout being in luenced by the magni icence o the orator #ho presented them. 1.1.2 (ubstance also includes an assessment o the #eight o the rebuttal or clash. This assessment must be done rom the standpoint o the a"erage reasonable person. 1.1.! The ad6udicator5s 6ob is to assess the strength o an argument regardless o #hether the other team is able to knock it do#n. 4 a team introduces #eak arguments/ it #ill not score highly in substance/ e"en i the other team does not re ute. T#o conse<uences lo# rom these. 1.1.* F#r( 5 i a ma6or argument is plainly #eak/ an opposing team #hich does not re ute may #ell ha"e committed greater sin than the team #hich introduced it. 4n e ect/ the team has led the other team to get a#ay #ith a #eak argument. This is not an automatic rule but it is true in many cases. & course/ it must be a ma6or argument/ not a minor e:ample #hich the opposing team correctly chooses to ignore in a"our o attacking more signi icant points. 1.1.+ Se-o'*/ ad6udicators ha"e to be care ul not to be in luenced by their o#n belie s or their o#n speciali>ed kno#ledge. 7or e:ample/ i you are a la#yer and you kno# that a team5s argument #as debunked by the 4nternational Court o Eustice 24CE3 last #eek/ you should probably not take into account this special kno#ledge unless the 4CE5s decision #as a matter o e:treme public notoriety.
1.2 STRATEGY 1.2.1 (trategy re<uires some attention. 4t co"ers t#o concepts' 1.2.1.1 1.2.1.2 the structure and timing o the speech and
.
1.2.2 (tructure A good speech has a clear beginning/ middle and end. Along the #ay/ there are signposts to help us see #here the debater is going. The se<uence o arguments is logical and lo#s naturally rom point to point. This is true o the irst debater outlining the $o"ernment5s case as it is o the third debater rebutting the $o"ernment5s case. $ood speech structure/ there ore/ is one component o the strategy. 1.2.! T#m#'$ is also important/ but it must not be taken to e:tremes. There are t#o aspects o timing' 1.2.!.1 1.2.!.2 speaking #ithin the allo#ed time limit and gi"ing an appropriate amount o time to the issues in the speech
1.2.* A debater ought to gi"e priority to important issues and lea"e unimportant ones to later. 4t is generally a good idea to rebut or begin #ith an attack on the other side by subse<uent debaters be ore going on to the debater5s o#n case. This is because it is more logical to get rid o the opposing arguments irst be ore trying to put something in its place. 1.2.+ (o/ the ad6udicator must #eigh not only the strength o the arguments in the (@;(TA%CE category/ but also the proper time and priority gi"en in the (TRATE$A category. 1.2.4 U'*er( a'*#'$ 0e I((,e( Closely related to the last point is that the debater should understand #hat the important issues #ere in the debate. 4t is a #aste o time or a rebuttal speaker to deal #ith points i crucial arguments are le t unans#ered. (uch a speaker #ould not understand the important issues o the debate and should not score #ell in (trategy. ;y contrast/ a speaker #ho understood #hat the issues #ere and dealt #ith them thoroughly should score #ell in (trategy. 1.2.. 4t is "ery important that ad6udicators understand the di erence bet#een (trategy and (ubstance. 4magine a debate #here a debater ans#ers critical issues #ith some #eak rebuttal. This debater should get poor marks or (ubstance because the rebuttal #as #eak but the debater should get reasonable marks or (trategy because the right arguments #ere being addressed.
)
1.!
LANGUAGE
1.!.1 Language re ers to using appropriate e:pressions containing correct sentence structures and grammar. 1.!.2 4t also co"ers pronunciation/ luency/ rhythm/ intonation and clarity o speech. & course/ English being a oreign language here/ ad6udicators should not be looking or Fueen5s English in our debaters/ but any e:pression #hich is mumbled or not clearly understood should not merit high marks in the Language section. 1.!.! &n the other hand/ any good language e:pression/ including the use o igures o speech/ idioms/ etc. appropriate and apt to the occasion/ may merit positi"e marks or Language.
1.)
STYLE 1.*.1 The term is rather misleading. Ad6udicators are not looking or debaters #ho are stylish. 1.*.2 (tyle co"ers the #ay the debaters5 speak. This can be noted in many #ays/ in unny accents/ body language 2mo"ement/ poise/ meaning ul gestures and eye contact3 and #ith the use o speci ic terminology. ;e tolerant o di erent #ays o presenting arguments. 1.*.! @se o palm cards and notes are allo#ed and should not be penalised/ unless a debater is reading rom them hea"ily. 1.*.* ;e tolerant o speaking styles and speed o deli"ery. 1enalise only #hen a debater5s style has gone beyond #hat e"eryone #ould e:pect.
2.0 2.1
REBUTTAL The use o general cases has conse<uences or rebuttal or clash. The &pposition team cannot concentrate on attacking the e:amples used by the $o"ernment. The e:amples might be #eak but the central case might still be sound. 4nstead/ the team #ill ha"e to concentrate on that case because that is #here the debate actually is. There is another conse<uence or rebuttal. 4t may be that a team has used a number o e:amples to illustrate the same point. 4 they can all be disposed o by the same piece o rebuttal/ the rebutting team does not ha"e to attack each o the e:amples indi"idually as #ell.
=
2.2
!.0
!.1
The thematic approach to argument outlined abo"e becomes critical in the Reply (peeches. These ha"e been described as an 0ad6udication rom our side5 and really amount to an o"er"ie# o the ma6or issues in the debate. A Reply speaker does not ha"e time to deal #ith small arguments or indi"idual e:amples. The debater must deal #ith the t#o or three ma6or issues in the debate in global terms/ sho#ing ho# they a"our the debater5s team and #ork against the opposing team. As a general rule/ a Reply speaker #ho descends to the le"el o dealing #ith indi"idual e:amples probably does not understand either the issues o the debate or the principles o good arguments.
!.2
).0 *.1
POINTS OF INFORMATION A 01oint o 4n ormation5 is o ered in the course o speech by a member o the opposing team. The debater may either accept or decline. 4 accepted/ the opponent may make a short point or ask a <uestion that deals #ith some issues in the debate 2pre erably one 6ust made by the debater3. 4t is a ormal inter6ection. 1oints o 4n ormation bring about a ma6or change in the role o the debaters in a debate. 4n this style/ each debater must take part rom beginning to end/ not 6ust during their o#n speech. The debaters play this role by o ering 1oints o 4n ormation. E"en i the points are not accepted/ they must still demonstrate that they are in"ol"ed in the debate by at least o ering. A debater #ho takes no part in the debate other than by making a speech #ould be marked do#n or (ubstance and (trategy.
*.2
*.!
%ote' The #inning teams rom the pre"ious year may participate in the current year but the te:t and presentation must not be an e:act replica. This concept paper is "alid until urther noti ication or re"ision rom the 9inistry o Education and can be used at all le"els or competitions organi>ed by the 9inistry.
POINTS OF INFORMATION
TO RE7UEST i. ii. iii. i". ". TO ACCEPT i. ii. iii. i". ". "i. TO DECLINE i. ii. iii. i". ".
Aes. Aes/ please. Aes/ (ir - 9iss. 1lease. 1lease go ahead. Aes/ accepted.
%o/ thank you. %o/ thanks. Denied. (orry/ (ir - 9iss. (orry.
4 the opponent 2during his - her 1oint 2s3 o in ormation3 is taking too much o your time/ you can ask him - her to sit do#n i he - she has e:ceeded the 1+ seconds5 time limit. Yo, ma& ,(e 0e(e e./re((#o'(8 i. ii. iii. i". 1lease sit do#n/ (ir - 9iss. Aou are taking too much o my time. Aou are taking too much o my time. 1lease sit do#n. Gindly sit do#n. Aou ha"e e:ceeded the time limit or 1&4. Aour time limit is up.
HHH 1lease note that it is o utmost importance that debaters be polite at all times during the course o the debate especially #hen accepting or declining 1oint2s3 o 4n ormation.
11
GLOSSARY 1. ad6udicator
8 8 8
to critici>e loudly/ shout or 6eer against a team or debater please re er to (tand to seek urther in ormation or e:planation on matters a sheet #here the ad6udicators #rite his - her comments during the proceedings o the debate to discuss and come to a consensus decision
electronic gadgets8 electrical items such as computers/ handphones/ radios/ 91!/ digital media players/ etc. harassment 8 heckling 8 to trouble/ torment or con use by continual persistent attacks/ <uestions/ etc. to interrupt by taunts the #inner is determined by the number o "otes gi"en to the #inning team please re er to the re*,- #o' o2 mar9( a ormal inter6ection #here the opposing team can ask <uestions/ clari y/ make a remark or correct a #ord or statement to re ute or dispro"e the opponent5s arguments by o ering contrary contentions or arguments an arena #here a debater #ill sum up the team5s arguments and then rebut the opposing team5s ma6or arguments brought up during the debate
1!. 1*.
reply speech 8
reduction o marks8 in 1arliamentary (tyle Debate marks are not deducted rom a team5s or indi"idual5s marks but are reduced (peaker stand strategy substance 8 8 8 8 a person #ho chairs a debate and ensures the smooth running o the proceedings rom #hich angle the team is going to argue the case ho# each team member #ork together to argue the case the arguments presented during the debate
12
AD:UDICATION FORMS
TIMING
Ro"e 1( Go;er'me' 1( O//o(# #o' 2'* Go;er'me' 2'* O//o(# #o' !r* Go;er'me' !r* O//o(# #o' Re/"& S/ee-0 <O//o(# #o'= Re/"& S/ee-0 <Go;er'me' = T#me9ee/er>( Name S#$'a ,re Da e T#me
DATUK WIRA DR. ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS SCHOOL@STATE' TOPIC '
ROLE NAME
SECOND GO?ERNMENT
26-30 21-25 16-20 11-15 6-10 26-30
THIRD GO?ERNMENT
21-25 16-20 11-15 6-10 14-15
REPLY SPEECH
12-13 10-11 8-9 6-7
MARKS
LANGUAGE <20= STYLE <20= TOTAL <100=
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
9-10
7-8
5-6
),81??
.?8)+
+,8,=
*?8++
2*8!=
),81??
.?8)+
+,8,=
*?8++
2*8!=
),81??
.?8)+
+,8,=
*?8++
2*8!=
*+8+?
!,8**
!?8!+
2*82=
1)82!
/350 DATE :
ADJUDICATORS SIGNATURE :
DATUK WIRA DR. ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY LANGUAGE DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS SCHOOL@STATE' TOPIC '
ROLE NAME
SECOND OPPOSITION
21-25 16-20 11-15 6-10 26-30
THIRD OPPOSITION
21-25 16-20 11-15 6-10 14-15
REPLY SPEECH
12-13 10-11 8-9 6-7
MARKS
LANGUAGE <20= STYLE <20= TOTAL <100=
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
9-10
7-8
5-6
),81??
.?8)+
+,8,=
*?8++
2*8!=
),81??
.?8)+
+,8,=
*?8++
2*8!=
),81??
.?8)+
+,8,=
*?8++
2*8!=
*+8+?
!,8**
!?8!+
2*82=
1)82!
/350
ADJUDICATORS SIGNATURE :
DATE :
DATUK WIRA DR. ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS NATIONAL LE?EL YEAR 8 BBBBBBBBBB
REPLY SPEECH OPPOSITION REBUTTAL REBUTTAL GO?ERNMENT
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
DATUK WIRA DR. ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS NATIONAL LE?EL YEAR 8 BBBBBBBBBB
AD:UDICATOR>S NOTES
1
ST
GO?ERNMENT
1ST OPPOSITION
%A9E ' 1&4 24%TEREECTED3 1&4 2A%(WERED3 De n I Agree-Re ute %e# De inition ' Rebut 1st $o"ernment
2ND GO?ERNMENT
%A9E ' 1&4 24%TEREECTED3 1&4 2A%(WERED3 De n I Agree-Re ute Rede ine '
2ND OPPOSITION
%A9E ' 1&4 24%TEREECTED3 1&4 2A%(WERED3 Rebut 2nd $o"ernment '
!RD GO?ERNMENT
%A9E ' 1&4 24%TEREECTED3 1&4 2A%(WERED3 Rebut 2nd &pposition '
!RD OPPOSITION
%A9E ' 1&424%TEREECTED3 1&42A%(WERED3 Rebut !rd $o"ernment '
Argument 1 '
Argument 1 '
Argument ! '
Argument ! '
Rea irm case ' Rea irm case ' 1&4 Rea irm case ' 1&4 1&4
1&4
1&4
41
DATUK WIRA DR. ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS ELABORATIONS ON ASPECTS OF AD:UDICATION
1. SUBSTANCE Arguments di"orced rom speaking style
2.
Assess #eight o rebuttal Assess points o argument Assess #eight o argument #ithout in luence o oratory
STRATEGY Co"ers structure and time $ood speech has beginning/ middle and ending (peaking #ithin the time limit Appropriate amount o time gi"en to issues in the speech 7ocus o rebuttal mainly on main issues presented in the debate Critical issues #ith #eak rebuttal #ould mean lo#er score or (@;(TA%CE but reasonable marks may be a#arded or (TRATE$A because the right arguments #ere addressed
!.
LANGUAGE Appropriate e:pression Correct sentence structure and grammar 1ronunciation/ luency/ rhythm/ intonation and clarity $ood language and e:pression appropriately used e.g. idioms and igures o speech
).
STYLE 1resentation on the #ay the debaters speak include body language/ eye contact and "oice modulation. 2;e tolerant o speaking style and speed o deli"ery3
RESULTS
DATUK WIRA DR. ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS NATIONAL LE?EL YEAR 8 BBBBBBBBBB
WINNING TEAM
TEAM
8 GO?ERNMENT @ OPPOSITION
1@2@!@)@3
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB < =
DATUK WIRA DR. ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS NATIONAL LE?EL YEAR 8 BBBBBBBBBB
?OTING
BEST DEBATER
DEBATER
A*+,*#-a or 1
A*+,*#-a or 2
A*+,*#-a or !
A*+,*#-a or )
A*+,*#-a or 3
DATUK WIRA DR. ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS NATIONAL LE?EL YEAR 8 BBBBBBBBBB
RESULT
BEST DEBATER
TEAM NAME 8 GO?ERNMENT @ OPPOSITION 8 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
SCHOOL@STATE 8 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
DATUK WIRA DR. ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS NATIONAL LE?EL YEAR 8 BBBBBBBBBB
RESULT
PRELIMINARY @ 7UARTER FINAL @ SEMI FINAL @ FINAL TEAM S-0oo" @ S a e WINNING TEAM BEST DEBATER
DATUK WIRA DR. ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS NATIONAL LE?EL YEAR 8 BBBBBBBBBB
RESULT
WINNING TEAM
TEAM
8 GO?ERNMENT @ OPPOSITION
Name S#$'a ,re CCCCCCCC.. CCCCCCCC.. CCCCCCCC.. CCCCCCCC.. CCCCCCCC..
C0#e2 A*+,*#-a or 8 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC.. A*+,*#-a or 1 A*+,*#-a or 2 A*+,*#-a or ! A*+,*#-a or ) Da e 8 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC.. 8 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC.. 8 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC.. 8 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC.. 8 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC..