Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE, INC. ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)
Plaintiff National Organization for Marriages Objections to Defendant United States of Americas Amended Exhibit List Pursuant to this Courts April 15, 2014 Order, Dkt. 64, Plaintiff, the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) hereby submits its objections to Defendants Amended Exhibit List, Dkt. 65. Added here are objections to Defendants new exhibits 136 and 137. All other objections are identical to NOMs initial Objections. (Dkt. 62).
Objection
N/A
N/A
HRC Documents0001
HRC Documents0019
First Amendment Privilege re: names and addresses of Plaintiffs contributors; Statutory Privilege under 26 U.S.C. 6103 for the same information; Privileged under Fed. R. of Evid. 501 as trade secrets. Relevancy as to specific names of donors and specific
HRC Documents0009
HRC Documents0111
4 5 6 7
8/26/2013 NOM Email Email from R. Koenig to M. Meisel Online SEIN Audit Trail IRS Printer Logs IRM 3.20.13 dated 1/1/2011 Citrix Audit Log Screen Shot Supplemental Information.pdf Online SEIN Audit Trail for ZKNLB ZKNLB Printer Usage by User ZKNLB Printer Event Log ZKNLB All logons
amounts contributed under Fed. R. Evid. 401-402. Relevancy as to Fed. R. Evid. 403 as the probative value of the names and addresses of donors and amounts that they contributed will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, confusion of the issues, and is substantially outweighed by the unfair prejudice. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues.
GOV-PROD-0000586
GOV-PROD-0000586
9 10 11 12
13
GOV-PROD-0000594
GOV-PROD-0000594
14 15 16
ZKNLB Print Events 1/21/2011 ZKNLB Print Events 1/21/2011 including page count IRS 3893C letter IRS 3983C letter macro IRS Form 4506-A Volumes For 2009-2014 IDRS ENMOD for NOM IRM 3.20.13 revision 1/1/2010 IRM 3.20.13 revision 1/1/2014 Online SEIN Audit Trail by Tax Year 12/12/2013 Hearsay Memorandum from J. Archibald Submission Processing Programs Review IRS Form 4506-A (March 2009) Instructions for IRS Form 4506-A Peters Training History 1 B&W Peters Training History 2 B&W Peters Training History 1 Peters Training History 2 Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative NOM Blog value of the evidence is 12/31/2013 substantially
17 18 19 20
21
GOV-PROD-0001344
GOV-PROD-0001345
22
GOV-PROD-0001571
GOV-PROD-0001576
23
GOV-PROD-0001593
GOV-PROD-0001593
24 25 26 27 28
29
GOV-PROD-0002024
GOV-PROD-0002029
30
GOV-PROD-0002049
GOV-PROD-0002055
31
GOV-PROD-0002056
GOV-PROD-0002062
32
GOV-PROD-0002063
GOV-PROD-0002064
outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901. Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901. Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid.
901; Hearsay. Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901. Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is
33
GOV-PROD-0002065
GOV-PROD-0002068
34
GOV-PROD-0002069
GOV-PROD-0002069
Video List
35
GOV-PROD-0002080
GOV-PROD-0002080
NOMFacebook 6/5/2013
36
GOV-PROD-0002082
GOV-PROD-0002082
NOMFacebook 10/4/2013
37
GOV-PROD-0002083
GOV-PROD-0002083
NOMFacebook 5/11/2013
38
GOV-PROD-0002084
GOV-PROD-0002084
NOMFacebook 6/10/2013
39
GOV-PROD-0002086
GOV-PROD-0002086
substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901. Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901. Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901. Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity
under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. 5081 Security Approval 2/9/2009 5081 Security Approval 2/11/2009 5081 Security Approval 2/11/2009 (2nd) TEAM 6 CJE Training document 8/18/2010 Email Thread from C. Peek re: Form 4506-A Email from D. Hamilton to W. Peters re: approval via 5081 1/19/2011 email from W. Peters to P. Riley re: media 1/19/2011 email exchange between W. Peters to P. Riley re: media 1/24/2011 email exchange between W. Peters to P. Riley re: media 2/28/2011 email from W. Peters to P. Riley re: media 3/2/2011 email from W. Peters to P. Riley re: media 3/2/2011 email exchange between W. Peters to P. Riley
40
GOV-PROD-0002125
GOV-PROD-0002125
41
GOV-PROD-0002130
GOV-PROD-0002131
42
GOV-PROD-0002132
GOV-PROD-0002133
43
GOV-PROD-0002134
GOV-PROD-0002134
44
GOV-PROD-0002158
GOV-PROD-0002159
45
GOV-PROD-0002161
GOV-PROD-0002162
Hearsay.
46
GOV-PROD-0002163
GOV-PROD-0002163
Hearsay.
47
GOV-PROD-0002164
GOV-PROD-0002165
Hearsay.
48
GOV-PROD-0002166
GOV-PROD-0002166
Hearsay.
49
GOV-PROD-0002167
GOV-PROD-0002167
Hearsay.
50
GOV-PROD-0002168
GOV-PROD-0002168
Hearsay.
51
GOV-PROD-0002169
GOV-PROD-0002170
re: media Computer screenshot 3/4/2011 email Hearsay. exchange between W. Peters to P. Riley re: media 3/4/2011 email Hearsay. exchange between W. Peters to P. Riley re: media 3/4/2011 email Hearsay. exchange between W. Peters to P. Riley re: media NOM request for investigation 4/18/2012 email from S. Whitaker to D. Hamilton re: access to OL-SEIN Excel spreadsheet attachment to GOV-PROD-002 350 IRS 3983C letter macro Doc. re: Plain Talk About Ethics 6/17/2013 TEGE Quality Alert SEIN Background and History Online 5081 history report W. Peters Time Entries IRM 10.5.5 dated 8/26/2013 UNAX
52
GOV-PROD-0002171
GOV-PROD-0002171
53
GOV-PROD-0002173
GOV-PROD-0002174
54
GOV-PROD-0002175
GOV-PROD-0002177
55
GOV-PROD-0002178
GOV-PROD-0002181
56
GOV-PROD-0002339
GOV-PROD-0002348
57
GOV-PROD-0002350
GOV-PROD-0002350
58 59
GOV-PROD-0002351 GOV-PROD-0002390
GOV-PROD-0002351 GOV-PROD-0002394
60 61
GOV-PROD-0002403 GOV-PROD-0002446
GOV-PROD-0002434 GOV-PROD-0002447
62 63 64 65 66
PowerPoint UNAX PowerPoint (Extended) W. Peters Performance Award 8/2009 W. Peters Performance Award 8/2010 W. Peters Performance Award 8/2010 (2nd) W. Peters Performance Award 8/2010 (3rd) W. Peters Performance Award 3/2010 1/26/2011 email thread from P. Riley to W. Peters re: media request for nonprofit database waiver of fees NOM Form 990 for 2007 First Amendment Privilege re: names and addresses of Plaintiffs contributors; Statutory Privilege under 26 U.S.C. 6103 for the same information; Privileged under Fed. R. of Evid. 501 as trade secrets. Relevancy as to specific names of donors and specific amounts contributed under Fed. R. Evid. 401-402. Relevancy as to Fed. R. Evid. 403 as the probative value of
67
GOV-PROD-0002509
GOV-PROD-0002532
68
GOV-PROD-0002091
GOV-PROD-0002091
69
GOV-PROD-0002092
GOV-PROD-0002092
70
GOV-PROD-0002093
GOV-PROD-0002093
71
GOV-PROD-0002094
GOV-PROD-0002094
72
GOV-PROD-0002095
GOV-PROD-0002095
73
GOV-PROD-0002533
GOV-PROD-0002536
74
GOV-PROD-0002579
GOV-PROD-0002595
75
GOV-PROD-0002596
GOV-PROD-0002632
76
GOV-PROD-0002633
GOV-PROD-0002664
77
GOV-PROD-0002665
GOV-PROD-0002703
the names and addresses of donors and amounts that they contributed will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, confusion of the issues, and is substantially outweighed by the unfair prejudice. First Amendment Privilege re: names and addresses of Plaintiffs contributors; Statutory Privilege under 26 U.S.C. 6103 for the same information; Privileged under Fed. R. of Evid. 501 as trade secrets. Relevancy as to specific names of donors and specific amounts contributed under Fed. R. Evid. 401-402. Relevancy as to Fed. R. Evid. 403 as the probative value of the names and addresses of donors and amounts that they contributed will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, confusion of the issues, and is substantially outweighed by the unfair prejudice. First Amendment Privilege re: names and addresses of Plaintiffs contributors; Statutory Privilege under 26 U.S.C. 6103 for the same information; Privileged under Fed. R. of Evid. 501 as trade secrets. Relevancy as to specific names of donors and specific
10
amounts contributed under Fed. R. Evid. 401-402. Relevancy as to Fed. R. Evid. 403 as the probative value of the names and addresses of donors and amounts that they contributed will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, confusion of the issues, and is substantially outweighed by the unfair prejudice. ZKNLB Printer Log Spreadsheet, various dates from 1/21/2011 to 11/28/2011 ZKNLB Printer Logs, various dates from 1/21/2011 to 11/28/2011 5/15/2012 letter from California FPPC to B. Brown Various letters relating to FPPC's investigation 6/28/2012 FPPC letter to Z. Kester and various responses Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity
78
GOV-PROD-0002547
GOV-PROD-0002547
79
GOV-PROD-0002548
GOV-PROD-0002550
80
NOM-01314
NOM-01314
81
NOM-01316
NOM-01322
82
NOM-01370
NOM-01375
83
NOM-01428
NOM-01432
11
84
NOM-01433
NOM-01437
85
NOM-01443
NOM-01445
86
NOM-01454
NOM-01456
87
NOM-01475
NOM-01477
under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. Relevancy, under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is
12
88
NOM-01483
NOM-01486
89
NOM-01516
NOM-01518
90
NOM-01524
NOM-01526
substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Authenticity
13
under Fed. R. of Evid. 901; Hearsay. 91 NOM-01633 NOM-01649 Eastman Invoices ActRight Invoices (Redacted) ActRight Expenses 6/4/2013 J. Eastman Testimony First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead 5/17/2013 email to undue delay, from E. Ray to wasting of time, and NOM re: IRS hits confusion of the issues; to date Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, 7/24/2012 email wasting of time, and thread from B. confusion of the issues; Duggan Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the 7/29/2013 email evidence is from E. Ray re: substantially media strategy outweighed by the
92 93
NOM-01654 NOM-01791
NOM-01790 NOM-01798
94
NOM-01815
NOM-01822
95
NOM-01853
NOM-01934
96
NOM-02070
NOM-02070
97
NOM-02104
NOM-02105
14
98
NOM-02110
NOM-02110
99
NOM-02317
NOM-02317
100
NOM-02546
NOM-02547
prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Privileged as Trade Secret under Fed. R. Evid. 501; Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, 11/1/2013 email wasting of time, and from E. Ray re: confusion of the issues; Susan Crabtree Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, 7/27/2012 email wasting of time, and from B. Duggan confusion of the issues; to B. Dunn (SFC) Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the 12/19/2013 email prejudice and will lead from B. Duggan to undue delay, to House staffers wasting of time, and re: USA's confusion of the issues; Answer Hearsay.
15
101
NOM-02558
NOM-02565
102
NOM-02590
NOM-02597
103
NOM-02673
NOM-02675
104
NOM-02722
NOM-02722
First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially 10/4/2013 email outweighed by the exchange prejudice and will lead between G. to undue delay, Norquist and B. wasting of time, and Brown re: confusion of the issues; lawsuit Hearsay. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead 4/6/2012 email to undue delay, thread re: NOM wasting of time, and demands federal confusion of the issues; investigation Hearsay. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, 6/11/2013 email wasting of time, and from B. Brown to confusion of the issues; supporters Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is 8/24/2013 email substantially from B. Monge outweighed by the to B. Duggan and prejudice and will lead Fr. Anthony to undue delay,
16
105
NOM-02726
NOM-02729
106
NOM-02774
NOM-02780
107
NOM-02781
NOM-02799
108
NOM-03670
NOM-03676
wasting of time, and confusion of the issues; Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the 9/27/2013 email prejudice and will lead re: Oversight to undue delay, Committee to wasting of time, and Investigate NOM confusion of the issues; Donor List Leak Hearsay. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, 4/12/2012 email wasting of time, and from B. Brown to confusion of the issues; NOMNews Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, Emails from wasting of time, and NOM re: confusion of the issues; disclosure Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy 8/16/2013 email under Fed. R. of Evid. from B. Duggan 401-402 and Fed. R. of re: timing of Evid. 403 as the lawsuit probative value of the
17
109
NOM-03683
NOM-03684
110
NOM-03685
NOM-03688
10/2/2013 emails from F. Schubert re: Draft NOM v. IRS Press Release
111
NOM-03692
NOM-03692
evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Privileged as trade secret under Fed. R. Evid. 501. Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Privileged as trade secret under Fed. R. Evid. 501; Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues; Hearsay. First Amendment privilege; Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the
18
prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues; Hearsay. 112 NOM-03700 NOM-03703 ActRight FPPC Invoices Online 5081 Annual Recertification On-Line SEIN User Guide First Amendment Privilege re: names and addresses of Plaintiffs contributors; Statutory Privilege under 26 U.S.C. 6103 for the same information; Privileged under Fed. R. of Evid. 501 as trade secrets. Relevancy as to specific names of donors and specific amounts contributed under Fed. R. Evid. 401-402. Relevancy as to Fed. R. Evid. 403 as the probative value of the names and addresses of donors and amounts that they contributed will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, confusion of the issues, and is substantially outweighed by the unfair prejudice. First Amendment Privilege re: names and addresses of Plaintiffs contributors; Statutory Privilege under 26 U.S.C. 6103 for the same information; Privileged under Fed. R. of Evid. 501 as trade secrets. Relevancy as
113 114
GOV-PROD-0002770 GOV-PROD-0002772
GOV-PROD-0002771 GOV-PROD-0002777
115
GOV-PROD-0002778
GOV-PROD-0002814
116
GOV-PROD-0002815
GOV-PROD-0002848
19
117
GOV-PROD-0002849
GOV-PROD-0002884
118
GOV-PROD-0002885
GOV-PROD-0002922
to specific names of donors and specific amounts contributed under Fed. R. Evid. 401-402. Relevancy as to Fed. R. Evid. 403 as the probative value of the names and addresses of donors and amounts that they contributed will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, confusion of the issues, and is substantially outweighed by the unfair prejudice. First Amendment Privilege re: names and addresses of Plaintiffs contributors; Statutory Privilege under 26 U.S.C. 6103 for the same information; Privileged under Fed. R. of Evid. 501 as trade secrets. Relevancy as to specific names of donors and specific amounts contributed under Fed. R. Evid. 401-402. Relevancy as to Fed. R. Evid. 403 as the probative value of the names and addresses of donors and amounts that they contributed will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, confusion of the issues, and is substantially outweighed by the unfair prejudice. First Amendment Privilege re: names and addresses of Plaintiffs contributors; Statutory Privilege under 26
20
U.S.C. 6103 for the same information; Privileged under Fed. R. of Evid. 501 as trade secrets. Relevancy as to specific names of donors and specific amounts contributed under Fed. R. Evid. 401-402. Relevancy as to Fed. R. Evid. 403 as the probative value of the names and addresses of donors and amounts that they contributed will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, confusion of the issues, and is substantially outweighed by the unfair prejudice. Document enclosure cover letter Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402
119
Karger000001
Karger000001
120
Karger000004
Karger000005
121 122
Karger000089 Karger000017
Karger000089 Karger000037
21
123
Karger000071
Karger000087
124
Karger000327
Karger000356
125
Karger000038
Karger000070
126
Karger000167
Karger000205
and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues. First Amendment Privilege re: names and addresses of Plaintiffs contributors; Statutory Privilege under 26 U.S.C. 6103 for the same information;
22
Privileged under Fed. R. of Evid. 501 as trade secrets. Relevancy as to specific names of donors and specific amounts contributed under Fed. R. Evid. 401-402. Relevancy as to Fed. R. Evid. 403 as the probative value of the names and addresses of donors and amounts that they contributed will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, confusion of the issues, and is substantially outweighed by the unfair prejudice. Hearsay. FPPC May 28, 2012 Letter to Karger FPPC Dec. 18, 2013 Letter to Karger Supplemental document enclosure letter Plaintiff's Oct. 3, 2013 Verified Complaint and all exhibits Plaintiff's January 21, 2014 Discovery Responses to USA First Set of Discovery Plaintiff's Feb. 12, 2014 Supplemental Discovery Responses to USA First Set of Discovery Plaintiff's Mar. 11, 2014
127
Karger000124
Karger000124
128
Karger000123
Karger000123
129
Karger000326
Karger000326
130
N/A
N/A
131
N/A
N/A
132
N/A
N/A
133
N/A
N/A
23
134
N/A
N/A
135
N/A
N/A
136
N/A
N/A
Discovery Responses to USA Second Set of Discovery Plaintiff's 26(a)(1) Disclosures dated 12/20/2013 Plaintiff's 26(a)(1) Supplemental Disclosures 2/21/2014 Plaintiffs Supplemental Response to Defendants Second Set of Requests for Admission and Interrogatories to Plaintiff, dated 4/1/2014. Relevancy under Fed. R. of Evid. 401-402 and Fed. R. of Evid. 403 as the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the prejudice and will lead to undue delay, wasting of time, and confusion of the issues; Hearsay.
137
NOM-04039
NOM-04064
Plaintiffs direct mail fundraising documents produced along with USA Exhibit 136
NOM reserves the right to amend the objections above based on the Courts Orders regarding pretrial motions.
24
Cleta Mitchell, of counsel (D.C. 433386)* William E. Davis, of counsel (D.C. 280057)* Mathew D. Gutierrez, of counsel (Fla. 0094014)* Kaylan L. Phillips (Ind. 30405-84)* Noel H. Johnson (Wisc. 1068004)* ACTRIGHT LEGAL FOUNDATION 209 West Main Street Plainfield, IN 46168 (317) 203-5599 (telephone) (888) 815-5641 (fax) cmitchell@foley.com wdavis@foley.com mgutierrez@foley.com kphillips@actrightlegal.org njohnson@actrightlegal.org Counsel for Plaintiff
/s/ Jason Torchinsky (Va. 47481) Shawn Toomey Sheehy (Va. 82630) Holtzman Vogel Josefiak PLLC 45 North Hill Drive, Suite 100 Warrenton, VA 20186 (540) 341-8808 (telephone) (540) 341-8809 (fax) jtorchinsky@hvjlaw.com ssheehy@hvjlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff John C. Eastman (Cal. 193726)* Anthony T. Caso (Cal. 88561)* Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence c/o Chapman University School of Law One University Drive Orange, CA 92866 (877) 855-3330 x2 (telephone) (714) 844-4817 (fax) jeastman@chapman.edu caso@chapman.edu Counsel for Plaintiff
25
Certificate of Service I hereby certify that on April 24, 2014, I served the foregoing Plaintiffs Objections to Defendants Amended Exhibit List on all registered users via CM/ECF including the following:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Philip M. Schreiber (D.C. 502714)* Benjamin L. Tompkins (D.C. 474906)* Christopher D. Belen (Va. 78281) Trial Attorneys, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 14198 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 (202) 514-6069 (Mr. Schreiber) (202) 514-5885 (Mr. Tompkins) (202) 307-2089 (Mr. Belen) Fax: 202-514-9868 philip.m.schreiber@usdoj.gov benjamin.l.tompkins@usdoj.gov christopher.d.belen@usdoj.gov Dana J. Boente Acting United States Attorney David Moskowitz Assistant U.S. Attorney 2100 Jamieson Avenue Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Telephone: (703) 299-3845 Fax: (703) 299-3983 david.moskowitz@usdoj.gov *Admitted Pro Hac Vice
_____/s/__________________ Jason Torchinsky (Va. 47481) Shawn Toomey Sheehy (Va. 82630) Holtzman Vogel Josefiak PLLC 45 North Hill Drive, Suite 100 Warrenton, VA 20186 (540) 341-8808 (telephone) (540) 341-8809 (fax)
jtorchinsky@hvjlaw.com ssheehy@hvjlaw.com
26