Shane E.

Flores
Michael G. Pontin
Frank W. Zok
Materials Department,
University of California,
Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Scratching of Elastic/Plastic
Materials With Hard Spherical
Indenters
A mechanistic framework has been developed for interpreting scratch tests performed
with spherical indenters on elastic/plastic materials. The pertinent scaling relations have
been identied through a plastic analysis and the model has been subsequently calibrated
by nite element calculations. The results show that the ratio of scratch force to normal
force (or apparent friction coefcient) can be partitioned into two additive components:
one due to interfacial friction and another associated with plastic deformation. The
plastic component scales parabolically with the normal force and depends only weakly
on the true (elastic) friction coefcient. A simple formula for the scratch force, based on
the plastic analysis and the numerical results, has been derived. Finally, experimental
measurements on two material standards commonly used for nanoindenter calibration
have been used to verify the theoretical results. DOI: 10.1115/1.2966268
1 Introduction
The advent of instrumented nanoindenters some two decades
ago has enabled an unprecedented capability for probing the me-
chanical properties of materials over a wide range of length scales
from nm to mm and forces from N to N. In addition to their
now-routine use in measuring material stiffness and hardness,
nanoindenters allow studies of creep, dynamic loading, thin lm
behavior, fracture, and adhesion. Good summaries of the test
methods and the underlying mechanics are presented in textbooks
by Bhushan 1 and Fischer-Cripps 2 as well as a recent review
article by Gouldstone et al. 3. A comparatively recent advance-
ment in the eld has been the development of instrumented in-
denter probes that can be displaced in a precise manner both nor-
mal and tangential to the sample surface. These probes allow
measurement of tribological propertiesthose involving friction,
abrasion, and wearat length scales and force ranges typical of
normal indentation 415. Despite the technological advance-
ments, analysis protocols for extracting fundamental material
properties from such tests have not reached maturity levels com-
parable to those used to ascertain modulus and hardness from
indentation tests.
The principal goal of the present article is to outline a mecha-
nistic framework for interpreting measurements from scratch tests
on elastic/plastic materials with spherical indenters. The latter
shape selection is motivated by the fact that, at low force levels,
stresses beneath a spherical indenter are below the elastic limits
and hence the tribological properties can be ascertained in the
absence of plasticity; yet, at higher force levels, responses in the
transitional elastic/plastic and the fully plastic regimes can also be
probed. In contrast, with sharp-tipped indenters such as the cube-
corner, Berkovich, and cone, the accessible behavioral domains
are far more restricted. That is, because of the self-similar defor-
mation elds associated with sharp tips, the strain level is xed
independent of normal force and dictated by indenter shape
1618. Probing material properties over a range of strains re-
quires use of indenters of varying shapes. Even then, if the tips are
very sharp, measurements cannot be made in the elastic domain.
Selection of the spherical indenter is further motivated by the
recognition that the asperities that make contact during sliding of
surfaces are more closely represented by protuberances with a
constant nite curvature rather than ones with innitely sharp
points.
As a prelude to forthcoming results and to provide perspective,
the test conditions of interest and the dominant behavioral do-
mains are illustrated in Fig. 1. Here a rigid sphere is pressed into
contact with a at slab of plastically deformable material with
normal force F
N
and subsequently slid across the slab surface with
lateral force F
L
. At sufciently low levels of F
N
, wherein the
contact is elastic, sliding occurs subject to Coulombs law, with
friction coefcient F
L
/ F
N
. In contrast, at high force levels,
both initial normal contact and subsequent sliding involve plastic
deformation. In this domain, the normalized scratch force or ap-
parent friction coefcient, F
L
/ F
N
, increases approximately para-
bolically with F
N
and exceeds the true elastic friction coef-
cient. An intermediate force range exists within which
deformation involves comparable amounts of elastic and plastic
strains and the curves in Fig. 1 transition accordingly. The high
load domain is the main focus of the present article.
The remainder of this article consists of three parts. In the rst,
an approximate analytical model of scratching of a rigid, perfectly
plastic material based on a virtual work analysis is presented. The
model is used to identify the scaling relation between the scratch
force and the geometric and material properties resulting in the
nondimensional parameters of the coordinate axes in Fig. 1.
Next, nite element calculations are used to investigate the effects
of normal force and friction coefcient on scratch force, with the
goal of ascertaining the key nondimensional parameters. Finally,
experimental measurements on two material standards are pre-
sented and compared with the model predictions.
2 Analytical Model
A lower-bound estimate of the scratch force is obtained using
established theorems of classical plasticity. The geometry to be
analyzed is depicted by the schematic in the top right corner of
Fig. 1. Scratching proceeds in two steps. First, a rigid spherical
indenter of radius R is pushed into a at semi-innite slab of rigid,
perfectly plastic material with normal force, F
N
. The radius, a, of
the resulting indentation is given by 19
a =

C
1
Ru
0
=
F
N
C
2

y
1
where u
0
is the maximum penetration depth,
y
is the material
yield strength, C
1
=2.7, and C
2
=3.0. The indenter is then moved
Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division of ASME for publication in the
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received January 22, 2008; nal manu-
script received June 30, 2008; published online August 22, 2008. Review conducted
by Zhigang Suo.
Journal of Applied Mechanics NOVEMBER 2008, Vol. 75 / 061021-1 Copyright 2008 by ASME
Downloaded 03 Sep 2008 to 128.111.74.218. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
laterally in the x-direction while maintaining constant normal
force. Three additional assumptions are invoked. i Sliding at the
interface between the two bodies obeys Coulombs law. ii The
scratch depth u
s
is equal to the initial indentation depth u
0
veri-
ed by subsequent nite element calculations. iii The forces at
the indenter/material interface remain below those needed to pro-
duce sticking friction.
In the steady-state domain, the rate of work done by scratching,
dW/ dx=F
L
, can be partitioned into two components: one,
dW
p
/ dx, due to plastic deformation beneath the indenter tip, and
another, dW
f
/ dx, from frictional sliding. The rate of dissipation is
obtained from an analysis of the following virtual sequence of
operations illustrated in Fig. 2. i A thin slab of thickness dx
perpendicular to the scratch direction and upstream from the
scratch tip is removed from the sample. ii The slab is indented
by a cylindrical roller of radius R under plane strain conditions to
produce a cylindrical divot of width 2a and depth u
s
identical to
those in the scratch wake. iii The indenter is slid across the
surface of the slab a distance dx. iv The deformed slab is
pasted onto the opposite face, downstream from the scratch tip,
thereby advancing the indenter tip by a distance dx. The work
done during this sequence in Steps ii and iii in particular is
dW
dx
= F
L
=

0
u
0
f
N
udu + F
N
2
where f
N
u is the force per unit length of cylinder, given by
f
N
u = 2a
y
C
3
3
where C
3
2.53 20. Combining Eqs. 13 and integrating
yields
F
L
F
N
= + k
0

F
N
R
2

y
4
where
k
0

4C
3
3C
1
C
2

3/2
0.05 5
This relation identies the two pertinent nondimensional pa-
rameters: the normalized scratch force, F
L
/ F
N
, and the normalized
normal force, F
N
/ R
2

y
. These represent the parameters on the
coordinate axes in Fig. 1 and are utilized in the presentation of
subsequent numerical and experimental results.
3 Numerical Analysis
3.1 Finite Element Model. Calculations of scratch response
were performed using the commercial nite element code
Fig. 1 Overview of the scratch conguration, the dominant behavioral do-
mains, and the trends in scratch force with normal force and friction
coefcient
Fig. 2 Schematic of virtual cutting, indenting, and pasting op-
erations used to model steady-state scratching
061021-2 / Vol. 75, NOVEMBER 2008 Transactions of the ASME
Downloaded 03 Sep 2008 to 128.111.74.218. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
ABAQUS/EXPLICITV6.4. For consistency with the experiments de-
scribed in the next section, the indenter is modeled as a rigid
axisymmetric cone with a full apical angle 2=60 deg and a
spherical tip of radius R. All other length scales are subsequently
normalized by R so the absolute value of R is arbitrary. The in-
denter is meshed with four-noded 3D rigid elements. The material
being indented is represented by a biased mesh rened near the
indentation surface and coarser toward its base using eight-noded
3D brick elements with reduced integration Fig. 3. Although all
results are presented in a nondimensional form, the absolute ma-
terial properties for most calculations were selected to be close to
those of typical engineering polymers
y
=60 MPa, E=3 GPa,
and =0.3. To assess the effects of yield strain, several simula-
tions were performed with the same values of
y
and but with a
higher modulus: E=300 GPa. To ensure numerical stability, the
hardening rate subsequent to yielding was taken to be 3 MPa -
nite but small. Surface sliding was allowed to occur in accor-
dance with Coulombs law, with friction coefcients =0, 0.125,
or 0.25. The bottom surface of the specimen was xed while
symmetry boundary conditions were applied to its sides.
The calculations were performed in two steps, consistent with
those described in Sec. 2. That is, a normal load was applied to the
indenter, up to peak values in the range F
N
/ R
2

y
1 and peak
normal displacements u
0
/ R0.2, and the indenter then displaced
laterally up to a displacement of w/ R3.
3.2 Indentation. An initial assessment of the numerical re-
sults was made by comparing the indentation response with exist-
ing analytical and experimental results. To facilitate the compari-
sons, the forces and displacements have been normalized by their
corresponding values at the onset of yield, F
y
and u
y
, given by
1,20
F
y
= 21.2
R
2

y
3
E
2
6
and
u
y
= 6.3
R
y
2
E
2
7
where E

is the plane strain modulus.

Two limiting behavioral domains exist. When F/ F
y
is not much
greater than unity, the spatial extent of plasticity and the magni-
tude of the plastic strains are small and hence the indentation
response is given to a good approximation by the elastic Hert-
zian solution 1,20
F
F
y
=
u
u
y

3/2
8
At the other limit, where F/ F
y
1, the force-displacement re-
sponse asymptotically approaches that for a rigid, perfectly plastic
material, given by 1,20
F
F
y
= 5.5
u
u
y
9
Comparisons of the numerical results and the analytical solutions
are presented in Fig. 4. Also shown are experimental results for
steel from a previous study as well as those for polymethyl-
methacrylate PMMA from the present study, described below.
Good agreement is obtained over the entire loading range. Addi-
tionally, friction has a minimal effect over the range of values
examined here, consistent with previous numerical investigations
19,21.
Parenthetically, the indentation response over the entire loading
range can be adequately described by a simple formula that com-
bines the results in Eqs. 8 and 9. Here the total displacement at
a prescribed force is taken as the sum of those for purely elastic
and purely plastic indentations, namely,
Fig. 3 Finite element mesh used for scratch and indentation simulations
Journal of Applied Mechanics NOVEMBER 2008, Vol. 75 / 061021-3
Downloaded 03 Sep 2008 to 128.111.74.218. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
u
u
y
=
F
F
y

2/3
+ 0.18
F
F
y
10
This relation reduces to that in Eq. 8 as F/ F
y
0 and that in Eq.
9 when F/ F
y
1. Upon comparison with the numerical results
Fig. 4, it appears to be reasonably accurate over the intermediate
force range as well.
3.3 Scratching. Representative results from the scratch simu-
lations are presented in Fig. 5. For normal forces above that
needed to initiate yield, both the normal displacement u/ R and the
scratch force F
L
/ F
N
initially increase slightly with w/ R a conse-
quence of the loss of contact between the indenter and the mate-
rial in the scratch wake, reach a peak, and then decrease and
saturate at constant values, independent of scratch displacement.
One manifestation of the steady state is the development of a
uniform plastic strain eld that translates with the indenter tip
during sliding, as illustrated in Fig. 6. An additional notable result
is that, for the case where =0, the scratch depth at steady state is
essentially identical to the initial indentation depth following ap-
plication of the normal force, consistent with the underlying as-
sumption of the model in Sec. 2. For nonzero values of , the
steady-state scratch depth falls somewhat below the indentation
depth Fig. 5d.
Based on dimensional analysis, the critical scratch displace-
ment, w
c
/ R, needed to achieve steady state is expected to scale
with the indent size, a/ R. Recognizing that, for small indents,
a/ R

u/ R, it follows that the corresponding normal displace-

ment u
c
/ Rw
c
/ R
2
. An inspection of the numerical results re-
veals that the onset of steady state can be adequately described by
u
c
/ R0.1w
c
/ R
2
Fig. 5b.
The effects of the normal force and the friction coefcient on
the scratch force are summarized in Fig. 7. When plotted as
F
L
/ F
N
versus

F
N
/ R
2

y
, the results are linear for a xed value of
, consistent with Eq. 4. Moreover, upon extrapolation to
F
N
/ R
2

y
=0 where the material response is purely elastic,
F
L
/ F
N
, as required. However, in apparent contradiction to
Eq. 4, the slopes of the lines in Fig. 7 are not constant but rather
exhibit a weak nearly linear dependence on , characterized by
Fig. 4 Indentation of elastic-plastic materials with a rigid
spherical indenter. Analytical solutions: Eq. 8 for elastic con-
tact, Eq. 9 for plastic contact, and Eq. 10 for elastic/plastic
contact. Data for steel adapted from Johnson 20. Finite ele-
ment results and experimental measurements on PMMA are
from the present study.
Fig. 5 Results of nite element calculations, showing the effects of normal force and friction
coefcient on scratch force and scratch depth. The open circles in b denote the approximate
points at which steady state is attained.
061021-4 / Vol. 75, NOVEMBER 2008 Transactions of the ASME
Downloaded 03 Sep 2008 to 128.111.74.218. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
k
0
= k
1
1 + k
2
11
where k
1
=0.184 and k
2
=1.75. This result is depicted by the solid
lines in Figs. 1 and 7. For friction coefcients 00.25, k
0
falls in the rather narrow range 0.180.26. Furthermore, these
values are considerably higher than the analytical prediction k
0
0.05, consistent with the lower-bound nature of the model.
The effects of the elastic modulus appear to be small. For the
case where =0, the scratch forces increase by only about 10% as
E is increased by two orders of magnitude from 3 GPa to
300 GPa.
4 Experimental Measurements
4.1 Materials and Test Methods. Scratch tests were per-
formed on two material standards commonly used for indenter
calibration: PMMA and a 99.999% pure 100 Al crystal. Scratch-
ing was performed using a 60 deg conical diamond indenter with
a 1 m tip radius. The test protocol consisted of i applying a
normal load in the range 0.071.0 mN for reasons described be-
low over a period of 5 s, ii holding at the peak load for 5 s, iii
displacing the indenter tip laterally over a distance of 10 m at a
rate of 0.33 m/ s, and iv holding for an additional 5 s before
unloading. Material response was characterized by the normalized
scratch force, F
L
/ F
N
, and the scratch depth, u/ R. Remnant
scratches were imaged by scanning probe microscopy SPM.
The normal forces used for the preceding scratch tests were
selected on the basis of two criteria: i that deformation be well
into the plastic domain, i.e., F/ F
y
1, and ii that the scratch
depth remain below R, to prevent contact of the conical surface of
the indenter with the test sample. To this end, preliminary inden-
tation tests were performed using a cube-corner tip to ascertain
hardness and modulus. Combining these property values with Eq.
6 and taking the lower limit on the allowable force to be 10F
y
,
the rst criterion can be expressed as

F
N
/R
2

y
15
y
12
where
y
=
y
/ E. Yield strains obtained from the cube-corner in-
dentations are
y
=0.02 and 0.002 for PMMA and Al, respectively,
and the corresponding critical forces

F
N
/ R
2

y
0.3 and 0.03. A
further assessment was made by a series of tests with the sphero-
conical indenter over a wide force range, to conrm that the de-
formation was indeed well into the plastic domain, as manifested
in a constant value of hardness independent of peak force. In-
dentation results of this type are plotted on Fig. 8. The maximum
allowable normal force to satisfy the second criterion was esti-
mated from the measured hardness and modulus coupled with the
result in Eq. 12 and the condition u/ R1. The key property
values are summarized in Table 1.
The true elastic friction coefcient was measured by scratch
tests performed using an indenter with a 50 m radius tip.
Strictly, the forces for such tests should remain below that for
yield, i.e.,

F
N
/ R
2

y
5
y
0.1 for PMMA and 0.01 for Al.
However, as demonstrated below, this criterion is overly stringent,
since F
L
/ F
N
remains essentially unchanged to signicantly higher
force levels.
4.2 Scratch Measurements. Typical scratch measurements
are presented in Fig. 9. For PMMA, the results closely resemble
those obtained from the nite element analysis. Notably, both
F
L
/ F
N
and u/ R initially increase with w/ R, reach a peak, and then
fall back to steady-state values. The predicted onset of steady
Fig. 6 Development of plastic strain beneath the indenter dur-
ing a typical scratch simulation for scratch displacements,
w/ R, of a 0, b 0.25, and c 2.5 for F
N
/ R
2

1/2
=0.76,
=0.125
Fig. 7 Effects of normal force and friction coefcient on
scratch force. The solid lines calculated using the formula
shown with k
1
=0.184 and k
2
=1.75. Filled symbols: E=3 GPa.
Open symbols: E=300 GPa.
Fig. 8 Indentation hardness of PMMA, measured over a wide
force range using both spheroconical and cube-corner
indenters
Journal of Applied Mechanics NOVEMBER 2008, Vol. 75 / 061021-5
Downloaded 03 Sep 2008 to 128.111.74.218. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
state, given by u
c
/ R0.1w
c
/ R
2
, agrees well with the measure-
ments. Once at steady state, F
L
/ F
N
and u/ R exhibit minimal uc-
tuations. Although similar features are obtained with the Al
sample, the reductions in F
L
/ F
N
and u/ R from their peaks to their
steady-state values are considerably greater. Furthermore, both
F
L
/ F
N
and u/ R exhibit periodic uctuations with w/ R, with
wavelengths that increase with F
N
.
The differences in steady-state response of the two materials
appear to correlate with the scratch shapes, ascertained from SPM
images Fig. 10. In PMMA, the scratches are remarkably uniform
along their length, consistent with the constancy of F
L
/ F
N
and
u/ R. In contrast, in Al, the scratches exhibit scalloped edges, with
characteristic wavelengths that mimic the oscillations in F
L
/ F
N
and u/ R. It is surmised that this behavior is due to a stick-slip
phenomenon.
Scratch force measurements from about 100 tests with the
1 m radius indenter are summarized in Fig. 11a. When plotted
as F
L
/ F
N
versus

F
N
/ R
2

y
assuming
y
=H/ 3, the results are
linear for both materials and exhibit similar slopes: k
0
=0.17 and
0.26 for PMMA and Al, respectively. These values are in reason-
able agreement with those obtained from the nite element calcu-
lations: 0.18k
0
0.26 for 00.25. The results of scratch
tests performed with the 50 m radius tip are plotted on Fig.
11b. The apparent friction coefcients obtained from the latter
tests initially decrease with increasing normal force likely due to
ne-scale surface roughness 1 but then reach plateau levels and
remain constant with further increases in force. For PMMA, yield-
ing initiates at

F
N
/ R
2

y
0.09somewhat above the values in
Fig. 11band thus the plateau value, F
L
/ F
N
=0.270.02, is
deemed to be the intrinsic friction coefcient. For Al, yielding is
predicted to occur at a lower force,

F
N
/ R
2

y
0.01, near the
transition. Although the plateau is seemingly in the postyielding
domain, the effect of plasticity via Eq. 4, plotted as a dashed
line in Fig. 11b is negligible over the force range of interest. As
a result, the average plateau value, F
L
/ F
N
=0.200.01, is taken as
the friction coefcient for this system. Both friction coefcients
obtained in this manner are virtually identical to those inferred
from extrapolations of the data in Fig. 11a to

F
N
/ R
2

y
=0.
5 Concluding Remarks
A mechanistic framework for interpreting scratch tests on plas-
tically deformable materials has been presented. Three behavioral
Table 1 Summary of indentation properties
PMMA Al
Hardness, H MPa 32010 39020
Modulus, E

GPa
5.00.1 737
Yield stress,
y
MPa
a
1054 1316
Yield force, F
y
N
b
1.00.1 0.0090.003
Yield displacement, u
y
nm
b
2.80.3 0.0200.006
a
Taken to be H/ 3.
b
Corresponds to R=1 m.
Fig. 9 Experimental measurements of scratch force and normal displacement for a and b
PMMA and c and d Al. The open circles in b and d denote approximate points at which
steady state is attained.
Fig. 10 SPM images of scratches in PMMA top and Al bot-
tom at various levels of normal force
061021-6 / Vol. 75, NOVEMBER 2008 Transactions of the ASME
Downloaded 03 Sep 2008 to 128.111.74.218. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
domains have been identied. For smooth surfaces, the scratch
force F
L
/ F
N
is constant when the normal force is below that
needed to initiate yield

F
N
/ R
2

y
5
y
and exhibits a linear
dependence on

F
N
/ R
2

y
in the high force domain

F
N
/ R
2

y
15
y
. Within the transition 5
y

F
N
/ R
2

y
15
y
, the ef-
fects of plasticity are small and, thus, to a good approximation,
F
L
/ F
N
.
Although not explicitly addressed in this study, a fourth domain
may arise at low force levels. For most real surfaces ones that are
not atomically smooth, contact initially occurs at discrete asperi-
ties 1. If the number density of asperities per unit nominal
contact area remains constant and the asperities deform elasti-
cally, the true contact area would scale as A
t
a
2
F
N
2/3
. Assuming,
at the simplest level, that the lateral force needed for sliding is
proportional to A
t
, it follows that the friction coefcient should
scale as F
L
/ F
N
F
N
1/3
. This prediction is qualitatively consis-
tent with the reduction in friction coefcient with increasing F
N
for both PMMA and Al at the lowest force levels.
Strictly, the present numerical results are applicable to materials
that exhibit time-independent, essentially perfectly plastic behav-
ior subsequent to yielding. The effects of viscoplasticity pertinent
to polymers such as PMMA and strain hardening intrinsic to
pure Al have yet to be probed. Such effects may account for the
slight differences in values of k
0
obtained for the two materials as
well as discrepancies between the experimental values and those
from the nite element calculations.
Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully acknowledge nancial support from the
National Institute of Health NIHR01DE014672.
References
1 Bhushan, B., 1999, Principles and Applications of Tribology, Wiley, New
York.
2 Fisher-Cripps, A. C., 2004, Nanoindentation, Springer, New York.
3 Gouldstone, A., Chollacoop, N., Dao, M., Li, J., Minor, A. M., and Shen, Y.
L., 2007, Indentation Across Size Scales and Disciplines: Recent Develop-
ments in Experimentation and Modeling, Acta Mater., 55, pp. 40154039.
4 Pontin, M. G., Moses, D. N., Waite, J. H., and Zok, F. W., 2007, A Nonmin-
eralized Approach to Abrasion Resistant Biomaterials, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A., 10434, pp. 1355913564.
5 Lafaye, S., and Troyon, M., 2006, On the Friction Behavior in Nanoscratch
Testing, Wear, 26178, pp. 905913.
6 Krupika, A., Johansson, M., and Hult, A., 2003, Use and Interpretation of
Scratch Tests on Ductile Polymer Coatings, Prog. Org. Coat., 461, pp.
3248.
7 Bucaille, J. L., Felder, E., and Hochstetter, G., 2004, Experimental and Three-
Dimensional Finite Element Study of Scratch Test of Polymers at Large De-
formations, ASME J. Tribol., 1262, pp. 372379.
8 Wong, J. S. S., Sue, H. J., Zeng, K. Y., Li, R. K. Y., and Mai, Y. W., 2004,
Scratch Damage of Polymers in Nanoscale, Acta Mater., 522, pp. 431
443.
9 Liu, Z., Sun, J., and Shen, W., 2002, Study of Plowing and Friction at the
Surfaces of Plastic Deformed Metals, Tribol. Int., 358, pp. 511522.
10 Charitidis, C. A., and Logothetidis, S., 2005, Effects of Normal Load on
Nanotribological Properties of Sputtered Carbon Nitride Films, Diamond
Relat. Mater., 141, pp. 98108.
11 Ma, X. G., Komvopoulos, K., Wan, D., Bogy, D. B., and Kim, Y. S., 2003,
Effects of Film Thickness and Contact Load on Nanotribological Properties
of Sputtered Amorphous Carbon Thin Films, Wear, 25410, pp. 10101018.
12 Adams, M. J., Allan, A., Briscoe, B. J., Doyle, P. J., Gorman, D. M., and
Johnson, S. A., 2001, An Experimental Study of the Nano-Scratch Behaviour
of PolyMethyl Methacrylate, Wear, 251112, pp. 15791583.
13 Habelitz, S., Marshall, S. J., Marshall, G. W., Jr., and Balooch, M., 2001, The
Functional Width of the Dentino-Enamel Junction Determined by AFM-Based
Nanoscratching, J. Struct. Biol., 1353, pp. 294301.
14 Subhash, G., and Zhang, W., 2002, Investigation of the Overall Friction Co-
efcient in Single-Pass Scratch Test, Wear, 25212, pp. 123134.
15 Felder, E., and Bucaille, J. L., 2006, Mechanical Analysis of the Scratching of
Metals and Polymers With Conical Indenters at Moderate and Large Strains,
Tribol. Int., 392, pp. 7087.
16 Wredenberg, F., and Larsson, P. L., 2007, On the Numerics and Correlation of
Scratch Testing, J. Mech. Mater. Struct., 2, pp. 573594.
17 Bellamare, S., Dao, M., and Suresh, S., 2007, The Frictional Sliding Re-
sponse of Elasto-Plastic Materials in Contact With a Conical Indenter, Int. J.
Solids Struct., 44, pp. 19701989.
18 Bellamare, S. C., Dao, M., and Suresh, S., 2008, Effects of Mechanical Prop-
erties and Surface Friction on Elasto-Plastic Sliding Contact, Mech. Mater.,
40, pp. 206219.
19 Mesarovic, S. D., and Fleck, N. A., 1999, Spherical Indentation of Elastic-
Plastic Solids, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 455, pp. 27072728.
20 Johnson, K. L., 2001, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cam-
bridge, UK.
21 Park, Y. J., and Pharr, G. M., 2004, Nanoindentation With Spherical Indent-
ers: Finite Element Studies of Deformation in the Elastic-Plastic Transition
Regime, Thin Solid Films, 447448, pp. 246250.
Fig. 11 Summary of scratch force measurements. Tests per-
formed with a 1 m and b 50 m tip radius indenters. The
error bars represent standard deviations. The values of F
L
/ F
N
at F
N
/ R
2

y
=0 in a were obtained from the plateau values in
b. The dashed line in b represents the predicted depen-
dence on

F
N
/ R
2

y
through Eqs. 4 and 11 for =0.2.
Journal of Applied Mechanics NOVEMBER 2008, Vol. 75 / 061021-7
Downloaded 03 Sep 2008 to 128.111.74.218. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm