specific antiporters? The answer could lie in the differences in accessibility and local environment of cata- lytic carboxylates in the different systems. By analogy with crystallized multidrug- binding transcriptional regulators 14 , catalytic carboxy lates in secondary-active multidrug transporters are most probably found in a large, flexible substrate-binding surface, where they cooperate with different sets of polar and non-polar amino-acid residues in order to bind structurally dissimilar substrates 8 . To create such a binding surface in the inward- facing conformation of a transporter, a large part of the protein must change conforma- tion. This causes the turnover number of the transporter the number of molecules of substrate that can be transported per minute to be relatively low (14 to 1,500 per minute, depending on the transporter and substrate), a characteristic that facilitates the binding of large organic molecules that have low diffusion rates and low rates of association and dissociation at binding sites. By contrast, the catalytic carboxylates in the NhaA antiporter are located between two funnels in the protein that provide access from the cytoplasm and the cells exterior to the centre of the cell membrane, at a selective site that can accommodate only Na + or Li + (ref. 13). The selectivity of NhaA is probably supported by fast, local conformational changes near the binding site and by a high turnover number (100,000 ions per minute) that is compatible with the high diffusion rates of small inorganic ions. Although the first examples of multi drug- binding surfaces bound to substrates are avail- able from crystal structures of the bacterial RND transporter AcrB (ref. 15) and the mouse ABC transporter ABCB1a (refs 8, 16), the anal- ogous structural information from crystallized MATE and MFS members is still missing. A high-resolution structure of inward-facing NorM bound to a substrate will therefore be extremely valuable. A related question follow- ing on from this is how the Na + selectivity of outward-facing NorM is maintained. The crystal structure 1 of NorM points to a conservation of general mechanisms of trans- port among structurally unrelated multidrug transporters, and raises several questions. How does Na + binding to NorM switch the proteins conformation from outward-facing to inward- facing, and what is the sequence of events that leads to re-establishment of the outward-facing state and release of substrate on the external side of the membrane? How many Na + ions are transported per substrate, and is this stoichi- ometry fixed, or variable and dependent on the chemical structure of the substrate 1012 ? And do translocation pathways in NorM allow the transport of lipid-soluble substrates from the cell membrane, as suggested by its crystal struc- ture? He and colleagues work 1 will certainly encourage further structural, biochemical, biophysical and modelling studies on MATE proteins in the quest for a molecular descrip- tion of the dynamic processes under lying substrate transport. Such a description would not only satisfy scientists academic interest. It would also be crucial for developing modu- lators that bind to and inhibit the activity of MATE proteins and other multi drug transport- ers, thus providing a solution to the increasing problem of multidrug resistance. Hendrik W. van Veen is in the Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PD, UK. e-mail: hwv20@cam.uc.uk 1. He, X. et al. Nature 467, 991994 (2010). 2. Omote, H., Hiasa, M., Matsumoto, T., Otsuka, M. & Moriyama, Y. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 27, 587593 (2006). 3. Brown, M. H., Paulsen, I. T. & Skurray, R. A. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 394395 (1999). 4. Saier, M. H. Jr & Paulsen, I. T. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 205213 (2001). 5. Yamashita, A., Singh, S. K., Kawate, T., Jin, Y. & Gouaux, E. Nature 437, 215223 (2005). 6. Shimamura, T. et al. Science 328, 470473 (2010). 7. Khare, D., Oldham, M. L., Orelle, C., Davidson, A. L. & Chen, J. Mol. Cell 33, 528536 (2009). 8. Gutmann, D. A. P., Ward, A., Urbatsch, I. L., Chang, G. & van Veen, H. W. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 3642 (2010). 9. Morita, Y., Kataoka, A., Shiota, S., Mizushima, T. & Tsuchiya, T. J. Bacteriol. 182, 66946697 (2000). 10. Yerushalmi, H. & Schuldiner, S. Biochemistry 39, 1471114719 (2000). 11. Sigal, N., Fluman, N., Siemion, S. & Bibi, E. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 69666971 (2009). 12. Schaedler, T. A. & van Veen, H. W. FASEB J. 24, 36533661 (2010). 13. Padan, E. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 435443 (2008). 14. Schumacher, M. A. et al. Science 294, 21582163 (2001). 15. Murakami, S., Nakashima, R., Yamashita, E., Matsumoto, T. & Yamaguchi, A. Nature 443, 173179 (2006). 16. Aller, S. G. et al. Science 323, 17181722 (2009). ATMOSPHERI C PHYSI CS Chorus keeps the diffuse aurora humming The origin of the diffuse aurora, whose beauty and intensity pale beside those of the famous aurora borealis, has remained controversial. A convincing explanation for this auroral display is now at hand. S L .943 PAT RI CK T. NE WE L L T he diffuse aurora, which is hard to see and has long been neglected despite its great importance to the energy budget of the upper atmosphere, has been attract- ing greater interest. On page 943 of this issue, Thorne and colleagues 1 have finally solved the decades-old mystery of how the diffuse aurora manages to keep going: a type of very low-frequency plasma wave called a chorus wave does the job. The diffuse aurora is created when charged particles (mostly electrons) that surround Earth as part of its magnetosphere collide with the ionosphere, the ionized part of the upper atmosphere. Although most such elec- trons do not reach the atmosphere, some do. Those electrons that can reach the ionosphere are rapidly lost to it, along with their energy. Because the electrons in question have tem- peratures of between about 1 million and 100 million degrees centigrade, they zip along at speeds that should empty the loss cone that allows them to reach the ionosphere in just a few seconds (electrons in the loss cone have nearly all their velocity parallel to Earths mag- netic field). Space physicists have long assumed that some type of strong scattering process was at work, constantly shifting new electrons from outside the loss cone into it. In fact, this hypothesis of strong scattering of pitch angle (the angle between the electrons trajectory and the direction of the magnetic field) has been accepted for decades. Now Thorne and colleagues 1 have convincingly demonstrated what causes the strong scattering. Figure 1 (overleaf) shows an auroral display that includes bright, multicoloured curtains of light to the left and centre. This is the discrete aurora, or the famous aurora borealis, which produces displays that are impressive even to a casual observer on the ground. At the bottom right of the picture is a dull green cloud. This is the diffuse aurora, and although it can be seen from the ground (with much more dif- ficulty than the discrete aurora), it lacks the dynamic shifts in form and intensity that are characteristic of its more photogenic sibling. Yet it turns out that the diffuse aurora, which is always present, and is always widely distrib- uted in rings around Earths magnetic poles, collectively accounts for about three-quarters of the auroral energy precipitating into the iono sphere 2 . This drab aurora has most of the energy flux simply through its persistence 2 1 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 0 | V O L 4 6 7 | N A T U R E | 9 2 7 NEWS & VIEWS RESEARCH 20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved 10 50 Years Ago The discovery that some errors of sexual development and other congenital defects in man were associated with karyotypic abnormalities has aroused considerable interest, and research in this field is growing rapidly Various systems of numbering of the chromosomes have been used by different research groups, making the comparison of their results difficult. A meeting with the object of trying to devise an agreed nomenclature was therefore arranged by Dr. T. T. Puck, of the University of Colorado, and held in Denver during April 911 A system was agreed on and a statement embodying it and other information relating to the identification of human mitotic chromosomes has been published (Lancet, i, 1063; 1960) It is hoped that the proposed standard system will be generally adopted, and that any who may prefer to use another scheme will refer to the proposed system and show clearly in what way their own system differs. From Nature 22 October 1960 100 Years Ago Fellows of the Zoological and other scientific societies, museum officials and others, are warned against an individual representing himself as a consumptive and asking for a recommendation to a hospital and temporary help. The modus operandi is to call upon you with a bogus introduction from another fellow of your society or someone known to you, and to mention a few other well-known persons as interested in his case. The individual is rather tall, thin, of wan appearance, and has a dark moustache. His manner shows some refinement and education, and is also persuasive, as proved by the number of those known to have, unfortunately, been victimised by his false representations. From Nature 20 October 1910 and geographical extent. It reduces the accu- racy of navigation using the Global Positioning System, affects upper-atmospheric, high- latitude chemistry (for example, it produces copious quantities of nitric oxide), and is in fact largely responsible for creating the ionosphere during darkness, when solar ultraviolet light cant do the job of separating electrons from neutral atoms. In recent years, and largely on the basis of theoretical studies, two distinct types of plasma wave electrostatic electron cyclo- tron harmonic (ECH) waves and whistler- mode chorus waves have been the leading candidates for the source that keeps the diffuse aurora going. But uncertainty has persisted because of the intricacies of the problem. Most researchers assumed that both types of wave contributed substantially. Rather surprisingly, Thorne et al. 1 have been able to provide a fairly definitive answer to the contrary. To do so, they combined advances that included observations, theory and modelling. The satellite CRRES has gathered detailed data on the power of plasma waves. But more work was needed, including detailed electron-scattering calculations. Doing those correctly, in turn, requires knowledge of how the waves propagate (ray tracing). Thorne and colleagues have managed to put all of these pieces together and to produce detailed simulation results clearly showing that chorus waves can scatter enough electrons to maintain the diffuse aurora, and that ECH waves cannot. But how do we know that these calculations and simulations can be trusted? The proof is in the details. First, the results correctly predict the gross morphology of the diffuse aurora, including its peak in the midnight-to-dawn sector. Perhaps even more convincingly, the calculations actually account for the observed fine details of the electron pitch-angle distributions. In fact, the new work can account for differences in lower- and higher-energy particle behaviour over a wide range of pitch angles. Thorne and colleagues seem to have provided a compelling answer to the question of why the bulk of auroral energy precipitating into the ionosphere occurs when and where it does, and why electrons in the magnetosphere are distributed in pitch angle in the way that they are. In the 1950s, early rocket shots into the auroral ionosphere recorded intense emissions from plasma waves that had frequencies of between a few hundred and several thousand hertz, with complex changes in both inten- sity and frequency occurring over a fraction of a second. This reminded their discoverer, Storey 3 , of a chorus of birds at dawn. Now, more than half a century later, Thorne and col- leagues have shown that it is this chorus that keeps the diffuse aurora humming. Patrick T. Newell is at the Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, Maryland 20723, USA. e-mail: patrick.newell@jhuapl.edu 1. Thorne, R. M., Ni, B., Tao, X., Horne, R. B. & Meredith, N. P. Nature 467, 943946 (2010). 2. Newell, P. T., Sotirelis, T. & Wing, S. J. Geophys. Res. 114, A09207, doi:10.1029/2009JA014326 (2009). 3. Storey, L. R. O. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 246, 113141 (1953). Figure 1. The discrete aurora includes the spectacular curtains and rays seen left and center. To the bottom right is the difuse aurora, a faint green cloud lacking the dynamic changes in intensity and morphology of the discrete aurora. However the difuse aurora actually contributes more to the global energy budget, because of its persistence. Photograph courtesy of Dr. M. Yamaguchi of the Swedish Institute of Space Physics. Figure 1 | Spot the diffuse aurora. The discrete aurora includes the spectacular curtains and rays seen on the left and centre of this image. At the bottom right is the diffuse aurora, a faint green cloud that lacks the dynamic changes in intensity and morphology of the discrete aurora. However, the diffuse aurora actually contributes more to the global energy budget of the upper atmosphere than does the discrete aurora because of its persistence and geographical extent. Thorne and colleagues 1 demonstrate that a type of plasma wave called a chorus wave keeps the diffuse aurora going. (Photo courtesy of M. Yamaguchi, Swedish Institute of Space Physics.) 9 2 8 | N A T U R E | V O L 4 6 7 | 2 1 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 0 NEWS & VIEWS RESEARCH 20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved 10 Reproducedwith permission of thecopyright owner. Further reproductionprohibited without permission.