Sunteți pe pagina 1din 14

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA


RECORD NO: ____110156 & 122204_______________

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Janice Wolk Grenadier
Appellant / Plaintiff
v.
ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER HECKMAN Esq
And
GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO, LTD,
And
DAVID MARK GRENADIER
Appellees / Defendants,
MOTION TO RE-OPEN DUE TO FRAUD ON THE COURT BY THE
SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA
FOR RULING AGAINST THEIR OWN LAWS AND ALLOWING
LAWYERS TO BE DISENGENOUS IN COURT IN CIRCUIT COURT
FILINGS AND SUPREME COURT FILINGS
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA
CASE # CH010654

Janice Wolk Grenadier
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, VA 22301
jwgrenadier@gmail.com
202-368-7178
pro se

Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman, Esquire
Grenadier Heckman Starace Duffett
649 South Washington Street
Alexandria, Va 22314
703-683-9000
Counsel for / pro se - Appellee - Ilona Ely
Grenadier Heckman & Grenadier Investment
Co. LTD till approximately May 28, 2010
Benard J. Dimuro, Esquire (VSB # 18784)
bdimuro@dimuro.com
Hillary J. Collyer, Esquire (VSB # 50952)
hcollyer@dimuro.com
John M. Tran, Esquire (VSB # 24349)
jtran@dimuro.com
DiMuroGinsburg
1101 King Street, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-684-4333
Counsel for - Appellee - Ilona Ely Grenadier
Heckman & Grenadier Investment Co. LTD from
approximately May 28, 2010
Michael J. Wiser, Esquire ( VSB #17630)
mjwesq@erols.com
510 King Street, Suite 416
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-836-7003
Counsel for Appellee David Mark Grenadier
2


COMES NOW Appellant with new evidence found on April 28, 2014 in the
Prince William Court shows the disingenuous behavior of the Circuit Court
Judges and the collusion of the Supreme Court of Virginia Chief Judge and
Justices to rule in favor of one of their own.
Appellant includes in this filing all other past filings with this court. With
Record No. 110156
Appeal and other documents
Petitioners Response To: Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal
and Record No. 122204
Appeal and other documents including and not limited to:
Appellant Response to Show Cause,
Appellants Motion in opposition to Appellees Joint Motion for Sanctions pursuant to
VA. Code 8.01 271.1,
Appellants Motion for Sanctions against Appellees and Appellees Clients pursuant to
VA Code 8.01 27.1, Cannons of Judicial Conduct and Rules of Professional Conduct
Appellants Request for a Demand/Compel in disclosure of Appellees attorney Michael
Weisers Legal fees from July 3, 2013 September 26, 2013 as their are more charges
to Judges Chambers then to his own Clients which brings into question the
Relationship of the Judges, Lawyers and Appellees
Opposition to Appellees Joint Opposition to Petitioner/Appellants Motion for Sanctions
Motion to rule the word Frivolous not be allowed in the description of Petitioner /
Appellant or her filings as there is nothing Frivolous about the fundamental right to Due
Process the basic Freedom that our country stands for The right to due process with
out Fraud from Judges, Lawyers, Elected Officials it is a primary component of
Freedom. The right to a Fair Trial a basic Constitutional right that has been the
source of the light of freedom that our country has given the World. Calling the
Appellant Frivolous is no different than burning or spitting on the United States of
Americas Flag.
3

That Virginia rated 47
th
and 49
th
in two separate studies is due the
arrogance and the disingenuous behavior of the Virginia Judicial System
and the Government officials in collusion to protect their own.
For this reason we see:

FBI cautions residents of public corruption in
Va.http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/2014/02/18/fbi-cautions-residents-of-public-
corruption-in-northern-virginia/5585877/

WASHINGTON (WUSA) -- The Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI ) Washington Field
Office is looking to identify any public corruption occurring in Northern Virginia.
The FBI says public corruption can occur "when a public official, at any level of government
local, state or federal does any official act in exchange for money, or other free goods or
services, for private gain. Public corruption could also include public employees who take
something of value for their own personal gain, thereby violating the public's trust."
The FBI says many of their investigations into public corruption start once they receive a tip
from someone. If you want to help identify potential criminal activity, the Washington Field
Office has set up a Northern Virginia Public Corruption Hotline at 703-686-6225 and you can
also e-mail them at NOVAPC@ic.fbi.gov.
Some of the examples of corruption include:
Government officials such as DMV employees, city inspectors, taxing or zoning assessors
or other regulatory agency employees, or even town councils or mayors;
Contracting officials at all levels, including those who manage government contracts or
regulatory permits; or, school resource officers who manage school accounts;
Local officials colluding with real estate investors to rig the bidding process at
foreclosure auctions;
A person representing the judicial branch - a judge, member of the jury or court
personnel; or,
A person representing law enforcement, who steals drugs from criminals, embezzles
government funds, falsifies records or smuggles contraband



That in 1990 when the Judges in the Prince William Circuit Court ruled that
they should not hear a case that Ilona Ely Grenadier was involved in set the
tone for the law and showed that the exact type of appearance of
impropriety that Va.Code 17.1.105(B) is designed to avoid, i.e. recused
judges (or judges who should be recused) selecting their successors
instead of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

4




5

Supreme Court Rule 17.1-105(B) provides:
If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil
or criminal, pending in their court as to render it improper, in their opinion, for
them to preside at the trial, unless the cause or proceeding is removed, as
provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk of the court shall
at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall
designate a judge of some other court of record or a retired judge of any such
court to preside at the trial of such case.


Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman / Appellees as an attorney is guilty of:

1. Being involved in the forgery of an addendum of the Sonia Grenadier Trust to
use to steal funds close to $95,000. For gain in Real Estate close to a value
today of $12 million or more and monthly income of approx. of $150,000 or more.
2. Stealing Herman Grenadier from his Garden at King David and donating his 3
spaces at King David and by all appearance taking a tax donation herself for the
3 spaces. IRS Fraud
3. That Appellees stole the property by all appearance called Bristow Rd., that
Appellant had a Lis Pendens on. That on or around February 13, 1986, where by
all appearance not only did Appellees take funds, Appellees put Appellees name
on a property that by all appearance and documents show belonged in the Trust
of Sonia Grenadier.
4. Appellees Paid GIC partner under the table to be able to take all the tax
deductions.
5. Appellees lied once caught from stealing the funds from the Sonia Grenadier
Trust through her law firm to the other lawyers and Family Members on how
much was stolen.
6. Appellees maliciously and knowingly lying to Appellant regarding funds to
purchase property called 28 E. Bellefonte Ave.
7. Appellees illegally using an attorney to liquidate the GIC property agreement with
an attorney not licensed to do business in Virginia.
6

8. Appellees maliciously manipulating Appellant on July 7, 1990 to get $30,000.
Commission to negotiate and make it look like Appellee Ilona was not involved in
the theft of funds from the Sonia Grenadier Trust.
9. Appellees acting as attorney to Appellant and is holding a note for the $30,000.
10. Appellees manipulating and stealing funds out of the 28 E. Bellefonte
partnership.
11. Appellees misleading and lying in the Federal Bankruptcy court that Appellant
was forced into because of the lies and manipulation of Appellees.
12. Appellees acting as an attorney to protect her illegal actions tried to get
Appellant to sign a Parenting Agreement and Separation Agreement that
benefited Appellees.
13. Appellee a divorce attorney manipulated Appellant into believing Appellant had
no rights to the properties in GIC. Appellees lied, Appellees was aware that at
this point Appellant had participated in all aspects of GIC and running it as well
as putting more money into GIC then Appellants husband which gave Appellant
at least of Appellee ownership in GIC (49%). Appellant never gave Appellees
permission to represent her interests and Appellant has been denied the tax
benefits as well as monthly income off of properties since 1989.
14. That Appellees knowingly as an attorney lied in the Circuit Court of Alexandria in
court, in admissions, filing false / fraudulent documents with court on several
occasions.
15. Appellees Bribed Judges through donations of tables, for donations towards
portraits, and parties.
16. Appellees bragged about giving free legal advice to Judge Brown who proceeded
over case three (3) times.
17. Appellees Bragged on several occasions on her influence over Judges ie Judge
Haddock to Appellant WE LOVE ILONA, you will never get a fair trial
18. / Appellees Ilona a lawyer politically/ with some financially supported Clerk of
Court Ed Semonian, Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel, Patsy Ticer, Adam
Ebbin and David Englin.
7

19. The collusion of Patsy Ticer and Judge Kent to set up Appellant with the x-wife
of Judge Kent; Martha Kent informed Appellant she had no rights, just like
Martha and her family the x-wife of Judge Kent had no rights. That Appellant
needed to move on because she could never win this, because she was no
longer one of them.
20. Appellees Ilona a lawyer made it clear her HATE of Catholics when she
informed Appellant Me and my family had nothing to do with you and your girls
because you raised them Catholic has since then callously, and maliciously has
shown her HATE through her attorney Ben DiMuro, Robin Grenadier, Andrea
Grenadier, Leah Lax Miller aka Lorretta Miller aka Muggy Cat aka Billy Sullivan.
Emails will show how much she HATES Catholics. The e-mails will show the
collusion to torment Appellant.
21. Appellees used her friendships to influence the Old Boy Network to support her
illegal and unprofessional behavior.
22. Appellees filed a false and disingenuous complaint with the State of Virginia
against King David Cemetery for burying a stranger in her garden. Who
Appellees had signed the appropriate documents for Ruth to be buried in the
garden. The stranger was buried with her Brother the late Judge Albert
Grenadier, Her father Herman Grenadier whom Ilona had stolen from his grave
and moved using according to King David the forged Addendum to the Trust
agreement. The forged trust addendum was also used to donate the 3 grave
sites that belonged to Sonia Grenadier. Emails and documentation from the State
of Virginia can be back this.
23. Appellees refuses to provide the canceled checks used to purchase the garden
or the permission she was given to move Herman and which accounts the funds
came out of to purchase the new garden.
24. Appellees in 1990 represented Appellant as her lawyer in the assignment
document of Appellants commission for a property called Holland Road. Is owed
with the interest from a not a value of $570,000 + refusing to turn over the note or
the money. This money went to keeping Appellees out of jail which Jim Arthur
went in 1993 to jail for 5 years for what Appellees has done.
8

25. Appellees arrogantly has bullied Appellant , manipulated money, the loss of
clients, to protect her own Law License using scare tactics, false pretense and
lies.
26. That Appellees in collusion with David Grenadier, Andrea, Robin passed a
rumor around that caused David Grenadier to pull a gun in Appellants home with
Appellants girls in the home.
27. That Appellees hired or as a favor had a gentleman that in collusion with the
Judges of the Circuit Court of Alexandria ( Haddock, Kemler, Dawkins and Clark)
was to drug Appellant and get sexually inappropriate pictures, to rape one of
Appellants daughters or to plant drugs in Appellants home or on Appellants
children to give Judges the power to claim Appellant was incompetent to move
forward in demanding Justice and Due Process.
28. That Appellees in collusion with David Grenadier sold a car which was not
theres to sell and in e-mails mocked Appellant for not being equal to them to be
able to get justice.
29. Appellees actions have been willful acts that were and are malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton and grossly reckless.
30. Appellant will be able to show other actions in court that are criminal actions.
31. Appellees collusion with Loretta Lax Miller aka Muggy Cat aka Billy Sullivan is
shown in these e-mails:

From:
LeahLax1234@aol.com <LeahLax1234@aol.com>
Tue, Dec 24, 2013
at 2:05 PM
To: jwgrenadier@gmail.com

something more scarier I contacted Ilona Ely
Freedman Grenadier Heckman your witch hunt is
over

From:LeahLax1234@aol.com <LeahLax1234@aol.com>
Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at
10:39 AM
To: jwgrendier@gmail.com
9

you know what YOU DIDN"T HELP JEWS YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD
TURN THEM IN BECAUSE ONE PERSON DID SOMETHING TO YOU THAT WAS JEWISH. YOU
MADE YOUR BED AND YOU LIED IN IT ! THIS FAMILY REJECTED YOU FOR NOT BEING JEWISH.
YOU STUPID GOY. YOU WERE REJECTED .. GET THAT INTO
YOUR THICK SKULL. NOW YOU ARE MAKING UP STORIES AND SPREADING
LIES! BLAMING ALL JEWS LIKE HITLER
FOR NOT LIVING ON EASY STREET. WELL
GET OFF YOUR ASS. GOOD YOU LOST ALL YOUR MONEY MAKES YOU HUMBLE. AND GOOD
YOU GOT A WHIPPING FROM A JEWISH LAWYER WHO WAS SMARTER THEN YOURS. GOOD
FOR HER. I WOULD HIRE HER IN A HEART BEAT. SHE WENT AFTER A JEW HATING NAZI AND
SHE WON. AND I HOPE SHE GAVE HER GRANDSON A GOOD TALKING TO FOR MARRYING A
GOY IN THE FIRST PLACE AND HE SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIS ZIPPER UP AND NOT HAVE HAD
SEX WITH A MENTALLY SICK PIECE OF CRAP LIKE YOU.
YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A MUSLIN LOVING
NAZI! YOU HATE YOURSELF THAT IS WHY YOU HATE JEWS YOU ARE BLOCKED! -




That Appellee a lawyer is guilty of the following criminal actions: of being involved in ,
Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the
Court, Involvement of Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account
through her law office for great personal gain over $10 Million in Real Estate, Theft of
Herman Grenadier, malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy,
Collusion, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest related
to the practice of law, violating code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated
Plaintiffs Religious, Political, United state Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and
Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title
18 US code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights under color of
law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title
VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of
1964, 18 USC 912. With her Intention to 18 USC 1341 -Frauds and swindles,
Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious behavior, Committed Fraud on
the Court, 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations prohibited, 18.2-172 - Forging, uttering,
10

etc., other writings et al. All of above charges will be proven with letters,
documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by the actions of Plaintiff.

That Appellees attorneys, have lied in court, lied in court documents
in Circuit Court and to the Supreme Court of Virginia, used bribery,
ex-parte communications with Judges and other criminal activities.

Appellant also reminds this court that under the Preamble, A Lawyers Responsibilities
reads in part:
A lawyers conduct should conform to the requirements or the law, both in professional
service to clients and in the lawyers business and personal affairs. A lawyer should use
the laws procedures only for legitimate purposes and not to harass or intimidate others.
A lawyer should demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it,
including judges, other lawyers and public officials. While it is a lawyers duty to uphold
legal process.

In the mature of law practice, however, conflicting responsibilities are encountered.
Virtually all difficult ethical problems arise from conflict between a lawyers
responsibilities to clients, to the legal system and to the lawyers own interest in
remaining an upright person while earning a satisfactory living.

the legal professions relative autonomy carries with it special responsibilities of self-
government. The profession has a responsibility to assure that its regulations are
conceived in the public interest and not in furtherance of parochial or self-interested
concerns of the bar. Every lawyer is responsible for observance of the Rules of
Professional Conduct. A lawyer should also aid in securing their observance by
other lawyers. Neglect of these responsibilities compromises the Independence
of the profession and the public interest which it serves,

Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession Rule 8.3 Reporting Misconduct

Is very clear if a lawyer knows of another lawyers illegal actions they are required to
report such actions to the appropriate authorities.

Rule 8.4 Misconduct:

It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) Violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional
Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do
so through the acts of another;
(b) Commit a criminal or deliberately wrongful act that reflects
adversely on the lawyers honesty, trustworthiness or fitness
to practice law;
11

(c) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or
misrepresentation which reflects adversely on the lawyers
fitness to practice law;
(d) State or imply an ability to influence improperly or upon
irrelevant grounds any tribunal, legislative body, or public
official; or
(e) Knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is
a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law.


This court should keep in mind:
Disciplinary Responsibilities of this court and all courts in Virginia .
1. A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial
likelihood that another judge has committed a violation of these Canons
should take appropriate action. A judge having knowledge that another
judge has committed a violation of these Canons that raises a substantial
question as to the other judge's fitness for office should inform the Judicial
Inquiry and Review Commission.

2. A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial
likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Code of
Professional Responsibility should take appropriate action. A judge having
knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Code of
Professional Responsibility that raises a substantial question as to the
lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects
should inform the Virginia State Bar.

That the legal profession is largely self-governing. Although other professions
also have been granted powers of self-government, the legal profession is
unique in this respect because of the close relationship between the profession
and the processes of government and law enforcement. This connection is
manifested in the fact that ultimate authority over the legal profession is vested
largely in the courts.
CANONS OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Canon1....
A Judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
Canon 2.
A Judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety
in all of the Judges activities.
Canon 3 ..
12

A Judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.

(Part Six, III of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia integrates
the Canons of Judicial Conduct for the State of Virginia stated above.)

That the Treason on the Courts by the Judges and the Judges they
supervise were willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive,
fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless
That Appellant will be able to show Appellant was denied her constitutional right of Due
Process in the courts of Virginia for being Catholic and no longer party to the Old Boy
Network.. That under Title 42 1983 will show violation of rights protected by the
Constitution and created by Federal Statute that persons employed by the State of
Virginia acting under color of state law violated Plaintiffs Constitutional rights. That two
Chief Judges (Chief J ustice The Honorable Cynthia D. Kinser and Hon. Lisa
Bondareff Kemler, Presiding J udge, Chief J udge,) who are or should be held
responsible for the actions of the Judges beneath them in there subversion. That they
are ultimately responsible for the actions in their courts and both are apparently Jewish
and have allowed Judges under their supervision to rule in Favoritism and Cronyism
and for attorneys to be disingenuous in the documents that they filed in court, and under
Judges order did not file documents entered into the record in the Plaintiffs file in the
Circuit Court of Alexandria. The new evidence under the Blog,
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com and the actual actions of the Judges shows the
collusion and the discrimination against Plaintiff for being Catholic.
CONCLUSION
WHEREFORE this court needs to react swiftly and hold the Appellees, Appellees
Attorneys and the following responsible for the malicious willful acts for their collusion to
knowingly torturing and bullying Appellant. The emotional harm that this has caused
Appellant and her daughters since 1986 by Appellees and 2007 for the remainder of the
people who have acted in collusion with Appellees:
Supreme Court of Virginia - Chief Justice Cynthia D. Kinser

13

Justices - Donald W. Lemons * S. Bernard Goodwyn * Leroy F. Milletter Jr.
* William C. Mims * Elizabeth A. McClanahan * Cleo Powell

Senior Justices Harry L. Carrico * Charles S. Russell * Elizabeth B. Lacy *
Lawrence L. Koontz Jr
Clerk of Court Patricia L. Harrington

State of Virginia Legislator Courts of Justice Dave Albo * Henry Marsh

Representatives of the City of Alexandria Senator Patsy Ticer (Ret) *
Senator Adam Ebbin * Delegate David Englin

Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission (JIRC) Donald Curry
Virginia State Bar (VSB) Edward Davis * James Michael McCauley

Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria Judges & Illegal appointed Judges
Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock
* John Kloch * Lisa B. Kemler * Nolan B. Dawkins * Thomas A. Fortkort
* J. Howe Brown * John J. McGrath Jr. * James C. Clark * Richard Bowen Potter
Chief Judge OBrien (PWC)

Clerk of Court of the City of Alexandria Ed Semonian
Commonwealth Attorney of the City of Alexandria Randy Sengel

In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Alexandria Division - Judge Gerald Bruce Lee

General Circuit Judge - Judge Richard J. McCue

Criminals Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman Lawyer/Officer of the Court
Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Keisler and Law Firm
David Mark Grenadier

Lawyers - Michael J. Weiser Esq. Ann Schmitt
Heather Jenquine - Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Keisler PC et al lawyers
DiMuroGinsburg Ben DiMuro * John Tran * Hillary J. Collyer Andrea Mosley

Law Firms Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Keisler PC
DiMuroGinsburg
Reed Smith

City of Alexandria Lawyers - Megan S. Roberts, George McAndrews, James L. Banks Jr.

Misc - Diane Fiske
Martha Kent
Ann Schmidt
Leah Lax aka- Loretta Lax Miller aka- Muggy Cats aka- Billy Sullivan
Andrea and Robin/Rachel Grenadier

14

That a Grand Jury should be instructed to have a Special Grand Jury look
into the Criminal Actions of all involved. That Sanctions and the demand to
make Appellant whole financially for all her lose and because these actions
were and still are willful acts that were and are malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless.
Appellant should be
awarded appropriate damages for the actions of all involved.

Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Wolk Grenadier
Pro se Appellant
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
202-368-7178
jwgrenadier@gmail.com
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE
Pursuant to Rule 5:17, I hereby certify that
The appellant is Janice Wolk Grenadeir pro se
The appellee is Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman, Esquire & Grenadier Investment Co Ltd was represented by
Grenadier, Anderson, Starace & Duffett till around May of 2010 the following counsel started representing Ilona Ely
Freedman Grenadier Heckman, Esq and Grenadier Investment Co Ltd
Dimuro Ginsburg PC
John Tran Esquire
Benard J. Dimuro, Esquire
908 King Street Suite 200
Alexandria, Virginia, 22314
703-684-4333

The appellee is David Mark Grenadier represented
by:
Michael J. Weiser, Esquire
510 King Street Suite 416
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
A copy of this Motion was mailed to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Virginia on April 30, 2014 e-mailed and mailed
to counsel for Appellees.
.
This 30th day of April 2014

Janice Wolk Grenadier

As J ohn F Kennedy said The cost of freedom is always high, but
Americans have always paid it. And one path we shall never choose,
and that is the path of surrender, or submission and There are risks
and costs to action. But, they are far less than the long range risks of
comfortable inaction.