Account Jobs Shop Events Awards Webinars White Papers Videos Advertise

Email Sign me up!

Get Avionics Weekly Eletter
A member of the Aviation Today Network Join us on:
Search
Advanced
Search
Subscribe
Digital Edition
Change Address
Thursday, April 12, 2012
GPS Backup: Is eLoran the Answer?
by Callan James
Recent headlines about possible threats to the GPS network is bringing new
life to the discussion about the vulnerability and potential backups to the
ubiquitous system. Despite the defeat of the LightSquared broadband
proposal, the threat of GPS interruption, intentional or otherwise, remains a
reality for the aviation industry, experts say.
According to researchers in the U.K., using its Sentinel GPS monitor network, between 50 and 450
jamming incidents were detected every day over a six month period last year. The Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) in the coming years plans a similar monitoring scheme across the United
States, called Patriot Watch. Unquestionably, such continuing investigations can only be an endless
cat-and-mouse game between adversaries, during which time experts anticipate civil GPS jamming will
continue to escalate in intensity, coupled with decreasing availability and integrity for users, while
underscoring the increasingly urgent need for an unjammable GPS backup for aviation and all other
critical national needs for positioning and timing.
This has brought about the recent Federal Register request for public comment on the FAA (/search
/?query=FAA) plan to reduce the size of the national VOR network while retaining DME in readiness
for NextGens Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) plan, and as a skeleton backup to GPS and Wide
Area Augmentation System (WAAS), should jamming render them unusable. Under the plan, most ILS
installations would be retained as backups for GPS Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) for the
same reason. But reducing VOR numbers down to FAA (/search/?query=FAA) s Minimum Operational
Network (MON) has the unfortunate effect of raising the VORs nationwide reception floor to above
5,000 feet, due to line of sight limitations. Losing GPS at night while cruising at 3,000 feet sounds
challenging
Experts say eLoran, an enhanced version of the Loran-C long-range, ground-based navigation system,
could provide a backup to GPS from the ground up and the essential timing signals for the nations
critical infrastructure. ELoran was not included in FAAs plan. (The U.S. Coast Guard terminated the
transmission of all U.S. Loran-C signals in 2010.)
Today, eLoran is the only system that can fully back up GPS, and all other GNSS systems planned or in
use in other countries, said UrsaNav President and CEO Charles Schue. UrsaNav, a diversified
technology company based in Chesapeake, Va., has assembled what could probably be described as
one of the worlds leading centers of excellence in Loran-C and eLoran.
Whats more, its becoming clearer and clearer that GPS interference, whether inadvertent or
deliberate, will continue to grow, thereby causing GNSS to become less and less valuable. In that
arena, eLoran provides two benefits. First, it can prevent the interruption or loss of vital satellite
services. But second, and less widely appreciated, it can vastly reduce the incentive to jam GNSS
systems when it becomes known that they have constant and essentially unjammable backups, Schue
said.
ELoran retains the powerful long range and unjammable 90-110 KHz low frequency signals of its
predecessor, plus their solid coverage from the surface to well above 60,000 feet, and out to over 1,000
miles, it is otherwise totally different.
Tweet Tweet 2
0
Share Share
0
-T (javascript:void(0);) / T (javascript:void(0);) / +T (javascript:void(0);) | Comment(s) (#comments)
10 Like Like
DecisionBriefs Military Commercial Business & General Aviation Unmanned Systems Air Traffic Management
In-Flight Connectivity Insider
Avionics Magazine :: GPS Backup: Is eLoran the Answer? http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/commercial/GPS-Backup-I...
1 of 2 2/24/14, 10:57 AM
From a pilots point of view, Loran-C suffered from two serious drawbacks precipitation static and the
transmitter stations inconvenient configurations in chains or groups of three or four stations to
provide regional navigation coverage. P-static was eliminated by H-field antennas, such as semi-flush
ADF loop antennas. ELoran dispenses with the old chain concept. Every eLoran transmitter would be
totally independent of all others, with the system operating on an all in view basis, exactly like GPS,
where incoming signals are selected for their best fix geometry.
But while the old Loran-C concept provided fix accuracies of less than a quarter mile, differential eLoran
has met and exceeded International Maritime Organization standards of 8 to 10 meters for harbor
entrance applications, with that performance attributed to its much higher signal stability of its
predecessor. Similarly, its +/- 100 nanosecond accuracy at the receiver antenna underscores its unique
timing capability, making it one of just three methods of achieving the US national Stratum 1 standard,
with the others being GPS and certain laboratory atomic clocks. One consequence of this is that a
U.S.-wide eLoran network could provide continuous RNP 0.3 performance throughout the CONUS.
It is now generally recognized that advanced low frequency signals, of which eLoran is one example,
can provide alternative timing either as a stand alone service or as a component of an existing
positioning, navigation and timing service, said Don Jewell, retired U.S. Air Force and GPS subject
matter expert. Jewell has been involved in GPS since its inception; he has served as a commander at
Schriever Air Force Base, Colo. the home of GPS before retiring as deputy chief scientist at Air
Force Space Command.
High power, virtually jam and spoof proof low-frequency signals operate independently of GPS and
provide a Stratum-1 Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) reference. The recognition of the criticality of
time to many aspects of our overall critical infrastructure beyond simply GPS has hopefully finally led to
an evaluation of the benefits of a nationwide low-frequency timing system, Jewell added.
Airborne eLoran operating procedure concepts would also be very different. Many see it as a totally
autonomous sensor on a chip, running in parallel and cross checking with the GPS possibly even
embedded in that unit but with the FMS automatically switching to eLoran should tracking divergence
due to GPS jamming be indicated. When the FMS determines that the GPS is no longer being jammed,
it switches back to satellite navigation. And there would be no pilot eLoran controls or displays, other
than perhaps a flight deck annunciator indicating a GPS sensor outage.
Rockwell Collins Names Olsen VP of
Business and Regional Systems
1 comment 2 months ago
AvatarBrad Correction, Craig Olsen will work
for Kent Statler.
Airbus A350 XWB Makes Doha Debut
1 comment 19 days ago
AvatarSirajudeen B Mohamed Qalbie Marhaba
A350 to the land of sacrice
U.S. Congress Reverses Cancellation of
UH-72A Lakotas
1 comment 25 days ago
AvatarAndre Leonard Finally some good
news..
Rotor & Wing Magazine :: Looking for a
Lift: Hoists 101
1 comment 20 days ago
AvatarDick Johnson My Commentary: "The
Rest Of The Story" MSPAC AW139
Botched Hoisting Training-blade back
ALSO ON AVIATION TODAY
0 Comments Aviation Today Login
d
Sort by Best Share

Start the discussion

WHAT'S THIS?
Subscribe

Add Disqus to your site

d
Favorite

Avionics Magazine :: GPS Backup: Is eLoran the Answer? http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/commercial/GPS-Backup-I...

2 of 2 2/24/14, 10:57 AM