Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
159175
www.elsevier.nlrlocaterhydromet
Abteilung Mikrobiologie, Institut fur Allgemeine Botanik, Uniersitat Hamburg, Ohnhorststrae 18, D-22609 Hamburg, Germany
b
Max-Planck-Institut fur Marine Mikrobiologie, Celsiusstrae 1, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
Abstract
Bioleaching of metal sulfides is effected by bacteria, like Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Leptospirillum ferrooxidans,
Sulfolobusr Acidianus, etc., via the re.generation of ironIII. ions and sulfuric acid.
According to the new integral model for bioleaching presented here, metal sulfides are degraded by a chemical attack of
ironIII. ions andror protons on the crystal lattice. The primary ironIII. ions are supplied by the bacterial extracellular
polymeric substances, where they are complexed to glucuronic acid residues. The mechanism and chemistry of the
degradation is determined by the mineral structure.
The disulfides pyrite FeS 2 ., molybdenite MoS 2 ., and tungstenite WS 2 . are degraded via the main intermediate
thiosulfate. Exclusively ironIII. ions are the oxidizing agents for the dissolution. Thiosulfate is, consequently, degraded in a
cyclic process to sulfate, with elemental sulfur being a side product. This explains, why only ironII. ion-oxidizing bacteria
are able to oxidize these metal sulfides.
The metal sulfides galena PbS., sphalerite ZnS., chalcopyrite CuFeS 2 ., hauerite MnS 2 ., orpiment As 2 S 3 ., and
realgar As 4 S 4 . are degradable by ironIII. ion and proton attack. Consequently, the main intermediates are polysulfides and
elemental sulfur thiosulfate is only a by-product of further degradation steps.. The dissolution proceeds via a H 2 S )q-radical
and polysulfides to elemental sulfur. Thus, these metal sulfides are degradable by all bacteria able to oxidize sulfur
compounds like T. thiooxidans, etc... The kinetics of these processes are dependent on the concentration of the ironIII. ions
and, in the latter case, on the solubility product of the metal sulfide. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Chemolithotrophic bacteria; Bioleaching; Extracellular polymeric substances
1. Introduction
The bacterial dissolution of metal sulfides, termed
bioleaching, is effected by bacteria like Thiobacillus
0304-386Xr01r$ - see front matter q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 3 0 4 - 3 8 6 X 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 0 - 8
160
Fe q 2H q 2SO
q 0.5O q 2H 2Fe q H O;
2q
FeS 2 q 3.5O 2 q H 2 O
2Fe 2q
3q
2y
4 ,
1.
2.
b. Indirect:
FeS 2 q 14Fe 3qq 8H 2 O
15Fe
2q
2y
q 16Hqq 2SO4 ,
MS q 2Fe 3q
3.
2q
S 0 q 1.5O 2 q H 2 O
q S 0 q 2Fe 2q ,
2H q SO
q
2y
4 .
4.
5.
In addition, two other mechanisms exist contributing to bioleaching, namely acid leaching and galvanic leaching. Both will not be considered in this
context, since the biologically dominated direct
andror indirect ones are considered to be most
important.
Especially the hypothesis of the direct mechanism
remained under question, and many workers have
reported about experiments either confirming or rejecting that hypothesis w38x. Consequently, up to
now this discussion is still pending. New insights
may, however, be derived from recent research,
which integrated for the first time advanced techniques for the unequivocal analysis of degradation
products occurring in the course of metal sulfide
dissolution and the analysis of extracellular poly-
161
Fig. 1. Electron band diagrams for pyrite a and chalcopyrite b reprinted from Crundwell w11x and Torma w15x.. a: The non-bonding valence
2y
band t 2g is derived from Fe 2q atomic orbitals only. b: The bonding valence band is derived from Cu2q and S 2 atomic orbitals.
162
Fig. 2. Acid insolubility of FeS 2 and acid dissolution of ZnS. 1 g of each mineral grain size 3650 mm. was added to 50 ml H 2 SO4 at pH
1.5, 1.9, or 2.5 in shake flasks. Concentrations of ZnII. ions for ZnS, and FeII. ions for FeS 2 , and pH at the beginning and the end of each
experiment were measured. Dissolution of ZnS increases with decreasing pH, whereas FeS 2 remained, independent of pH, almost insoluble
curves are upon each other..
whereas pyrite, molybdenite, and tungstenite are insoluble. This is demonstrated for pyrite and sphalerite in Fig. 2.
surface, accumulate charges by extraction of electrons from the t 2g valence band. This accumulation
shall cause a shift of the electronic states to such
positive potentials that the sulfur moiety will be
oxidized. Whereas the latter two explanations for the
oxidation of the pyritic sulfur moiety by ironIII.
ions are similar, the first one is fairly different. Up to
now, the detailed mechanisms have not been clarified yet. Nevertheless, all theories are congruent in
the fact that pyrite can only be solubilized by an
oxidizing attack, namely by ironIII. ions.
Furthermore, even at neutral pH ironIII. ions are
the preferred electron acceptor in comparison to
molecular oxygen w27x. At neutral pH, the ironII.
ions remain adsorbed at the pyrite surface and are
reoxidized by dissolved oxygen. Because of kinetic
data and molecular orbital considerations it became
obvious that ironIII. ions instead of dissolved oxygen are the decisive pyrite attacking agents at low
and also at high pH. Thus, Eq. 1. is an inadequate
description of pyrite oxidation.
The formation of sulfate or elemental sulfur as
products of ironIII. ion mediated pyrite dissolution
is described by Eqs. 3. and 4.. However, these are
summarizing equations and cannot explain the underlying mechanisms. Especially the formation of polythionates, detected in chemical and biological pyrite
oxidation, remains unclear from these equations
w22,28x. Consequently, the leach equations have to be
revised.
163
Fig. 3. Pyrite dissolution by T. ferrooxidans T.f.., L. ferrooxidans L.f.., T. thiooxidans T.t.., Sulfolobusr Acidianus sp. S.rA.., and in
sterile control assays c.. determined as dissolved iron after one week of incubation. Assay conditions: 1 g pyrite, grain size 3650 mm, 50
ml salt solution, pH 1.9. Assays at 288C were inoculated with 1 = 10 9 cells and shaken at 150 rpm, assays at 608C were inoculated with
2 = 10 8 cells and not shaken reprinted from Schippers and Sand w29x..
164
Fig. 5. Simplified scheme of the thiosulfate mechanism in pyrite oxidation adapted from Schippers et al. w28x..
The thiosulfate mechanism is also valid for chemical pyrite oxidation at neutral pH, e.g. in carbonate
and pyrite containing mine waste w51,52x. At neutral
pH, the chemical pyrite oxidation rate is about 10
times higher than the one under acidic conditions
w20,21x. Thiosulfate, trithionate, and tetrathionate are
the main products of pyrite oxidation in carbonate
buffered solutions. These substances are suitable
substrates for moderately acidophilic, sulfur compound oxidizing bacteria w53x. Consequently, T.
neapolitanus, T. noellus, and Thiomonas intermedia
are able to grow with the dissolution products of
pyrite, but are not able to increase pyrite dissolution,
because of the lack of ironII. ion oxidizing activity
w52x. These bacteria live from the Aenergy gapB
between the incomplete chemical oxidation of the
sulfur moiety of pyrite at neutral pH values and its
complete oxidation to sulfuric acid. In addition, by
acid production the pH is lowered, allowing acidophilic leaching bacteria, like T. ferrooxidans, to
grow w54x and to oxidize pyrite.
3.3. (Bio)leaching of molybdenite (MoS2 ) and tungstenite (WS2 )
Chemical leach experiments have been performed
with pyrite and molybdenite. The results are shown
in Table 1. Because with molybdenite the same
165
end-products were obtained as with pyrite and because of the same electronic structure, it is obvious
that molybdenite is degraded by the same mechanism. Tungstenite is, because of the identical electronic structure, included in this group of metal
sulfides, which are degraded via the key intermediate
thiosulfate. Accordingly, the main end-product of the
sulfur moiety of molybdenite and tungstenite degradation is sulfate.
Table 1
Formation of sulfur compounds resulting from chemical metal sulfide oxidation
Metal sulfide
Formula
Structurea
Purity
%. b
S 8 %. c
2y
SO4
%. c
2y
S 4 O6
%. c
2y
S 5 O6
%. c
Pyrite
Molybdenite
Hauerite
Sphalerite
Chalcopyrite
Galena
Orpiment
Realgar
FeS 2
MoS 2
MnS 2
ZnS
CuFeS 2
PbS
As 2 S 3
As 4 S 4
disulfide
layer
disulfide
sphalerite
sphalerite
halite
layer
ring
) 99
93
) 99
95
) 99
) 99
) 99
) 99
16.1
8.4
93.6
94.9
92.2
99.9
94.8
92.5
81.7
90.4
3.7
4.8
7.3
0.1
5.2
7.5
1.3
0.6
1.2
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.6
1.5
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oxidizing agent 10 mM FeIII. chloride, pH 1.9, 288C. Reprinted from Schippers and Sand w1x.
a
Mineralogical structure type w13x.
b
Purity calculations base on ICP measurements of elemental composition. Impurities were not detected by X-ray diffraction except some
geerite Cu 8 S 5 . in case of chalcopyrite.
c
Percentage values were calculated after 24 h incubation except for galena 1 h., hauerite 5 h., and realgar 168 h., due to the different
reaction rates. In case of hauerite, traces of hexathionate were detectable, too. Experiments with ironIII. sulfate instead of ironIII. chloride
under anaerobic conditions in a glove-box with four selected metal sulfides gave similar results data not shown..
166
Fig. 6. Crystal structure of sphalerite a, chalcopyrite b, and galena NaCl structure. c reprinted from Vaughan and Craig w13x..
MS q 2H
2q
q H 2 S.
H S
H 2 S q Fe 3q
q Fe 2q.
)q
MS q Fe 3qq 2Hq
6.
7.
2q
q H 2 S )qq Fe 2q.
8.
H O q HS .
q
9.
167
Fig. 7. Simplified scheme of the polysulfide mechanism Schippers and Sand w1x..
HSyq Hq.
2
10 .
HS q HS .
)
2
11 .
HS q S .
HSy
9
12 .
molecule is also possible. The O 2 molecule is reduced via a superoxide radical and a peroxide
molecule to water w56x. However, ironIII. ions are
generally much more efficient in extracting electrons
from a metal sulfide lattice than O 2 w9,10x.
The reactions 712 inherently explain the formation of elemental sulfur as the main sulfur compound. Minor amounts of sulfate and polythionates
are products of thiosulfate reactions w12,28,57,58x.
Thiosulfate may arise by a side reaction w12x:
HSyq 3r2O 2
n
HS O q n y 2. r8 S ,
y
3
13 .
HS O .
1r8S 8 q HSOy
3
y
3
14 .
Fig. 8. Leaching of ZnS by T. thiooxidans strain R20 w60x. The organism was pregrown on ZnS, before the experiment was started by
addition of 10 9 cells to 1 g ZnS fine grained. in 50 ml salt solution in shake flasks at 288C in the dark. Concentrations of ZnII. ions, S 8 ,
sulfate, and pH were measured. Tt, assays with T. thiooxidans; c., sterile control assays. Sulfuric acid for ZnS dissolution originates from
biological oxidation of chemically formed elemental sulfur S8.. In sterile control assays elemental sulfur accumulates, simultaneously the
pH increases, both lowering the dissolution rate of ZnS. Reprinted from Schippers and Sand w1x.
168
Fig. 9. Scheme of thiosulfate and polysulfide mechanism in bio.leaching of metal sulfides. MS s metal sulfide; M 2qs metal ion;
2y
S 2 O 3 s thiosulfate; S 2ys polysulfide with chain length n.; S 8 s elemental sulfur; Tf, Lf, Tt s enzymatic reaction by T. ferrooxidans,
n
L. ferrooxidans, andror T. thiooxidans; Tf, Tt. s enzymatic reaction possible reprinted from Schippers and Sand w1x..
HS O q n y 2. r8 S
2
y
3
15 .
FeS 2 q 6Fe 3qq 3H 2 O
S O
2y
S 2 O 3 q 8Fe 3qq 5H 2 O
2y
2q
q
3 q 7Fe q 6H ,
16 .
2SO
2y
2q
q
4 q 8Fe q 10H ;
17 .
MS q Fe 3qq Hq
2q
q 0.5H 2 S n q Fe 2q
n G 2. ,
0.125S q Fe q H ,
0.125S q 1.5O q H O SO q 2H .
0.5H 2 S n q Fe 3qq
8
2q
2y
4
18 .
19 .
20 .
The scheme in Fig. 9 gives an overview, including some knowledge about biologically andror
chemically catalyzed parts.
169
by glucuronic acid subunits of the carbohydrate moiety. The molar ratio of both constituents amounted to
2 moles glucuronic acid to 1 mole ironIII. ions
suggesting the formation of stable complexes w64x.
These complexes render the cells with a net positive
charge three times positive, two times negative
charge. and, thus, allow them to attach to the negatively charged pyrite surface in the course of an
electrostatic interaction.
Furthermore, cells grown on sulfur exhibit a different composition of the exopolymers leading to
strongly hydrophobic surface properties. and do not
attach to pyrite anymore. Glucuronic acids and iron
species were, consequently, not detectable. However,
a slight, but significant, increase of the phosphate
content of the EPS was noted. Thus, the substrater
substratum influences the chemical structure of the
exopolymers. The mechanism of regulation still needs
to be clarified. Possibly, chaperones w65x are involved, because the change of substrate means
physiological stress for the cells.
Considering the bacterial surface properties, attachment to sulfur is presumably dominated by hydrophobic van der Waals. attraction forces, while
sorption to pyrite is due to electrostatic interactions,
probably combined with some involvement of hydrophobic forces. The involvement of charge effects
is corroborated by earlier studies on the molecular
structure of pyrite w25x, indicating that those cations
or molecules, which act as Lewis acids willing to
accept the unshared pair of electrons of pyritic sulfur., e.g. EPS bound. iron species, will be preferentially attracted.
Obviously, ironIII. ions are of pivotal importance
for cell attachment. In addition, these ions also mediate the primary steps in the degradation of metal
sulfides. For the start of bioleaching, a sufficient
amount of ironIII. ions in the medium is necessary.
It could be demonstrated that the rate of pyrite
oxidation remained negligible, until the ironIII. ion
concentration had increased by chemical oxidation
of solubilized ironII. ions or by supplementation. to
a threshold value of G 0.2 grl data not shown.. In
Fig. 10, the effect of an addition of ironIII. ions to
the medium 0.5 grl. is demonstrated. If a sufficient
concentration of these ions was present, leaching of
pyrite by cells of T. ferrooxidans. started without
lag phase.
170
Fig. 10. Importance of ironIII. ions for pyrite dissolution by cells of T. ferrooxidans. Pyrite dissolution was measured as an increase of iron
ion and sulfate concentration. IronIII. ions 0.5 grl. were added at the beginning of the experiment 1. or after 7 days 2.. v s total iron
ion concentration, ' s sulfate concentration, start cell concentration 10 9 rml from Gehrke et al. w63x..
image clearly illustrates that adhesion was specifically associated with a distinct indentation of a dislocation area fault..
Corroding surface regions exhibiting anodes and
cathodes., thus, seem to be the preferential attachment sites for net positively charged bacteria like T.
ferrooxidans, because an electrostatic interaction with
the negatively charged cathode becomes possible.
Furthermore, at the anode the substrate ironII. ions
are available. This hypothesis is in agreement with
Berry and Murr w66x, who reported that the crystal
structure of a sulfide. mineral is an important factor
influencing the bioleaching process.
An attempt to determine localized anodic and
cathodic sites by using the scanning vibrating electrode technique failed, because the anodes and cathodes seem to be separated by less than 10 mm
below the lateral resolution of the scan motor..
Analysis of the current maps obtained showed neither distinguishable anodic nor cathodic activities
data not shown., thus suggesting the predominance
of general, flat-spread corrosion phenomena.
Since electrically active sites of corrosion were
not detectable, additional surface potential measurements have been performed using a Kelvin probe.
These experiments demonstrated that the biologically
driven process of pyrite degradation is electrochemical in nature. The experiments were repeated several
times under different conditions, to evaluate the importance of EPS and the complexed ironIII. ions.
The results are summarized in Table 2.
171
Fig. 11. Atomic force microscopy image of a pyrite surface with attached cells of T. ferrooxidans. The cells some are indicated by arrows.
are sparsely distributed over the surface.
172
Fig. 12. Atomic force microscopy image of a cell of T. ferrooxidans being specifically attached to a dislocation area surface fault..
59
245
344
150
212
18
However, the coating of the nutrient source by exopolymers seems to be much more likely. As a
consequence, the planktonic leach bacteria would not
be able anymore to attach to the metal sulfide and to
degrade it, consequently, simply because they are
facing an exopolymeric surface, not a mineral one.
The above-described attachment mechanisms do not
work under these circumstances.
It may also be assumed that the EPS constitute
nucleation sites for the precipitation of minerals, as
described by Douglas and Beveridge w76x. Consequently, precipitates like jarosites are formed, because of an interaction between the ironIII. ions and
iron sulfates andror hydroxides, etc., and, thus,
would be of biogenic nature.
Summarizing, the ironIII. ion binding compounds glucuronic acid. of the EPS of T. ferrooxidans and L. ferrooxidans are decisive for the interactions between cells and substratersubstratum. Geesey
and Jang w64x reported too that the polysaccharides
of bacterial EPS are commonly responsible for binding of metal ions through glucuronic acid subunits.
The latter exhibit high complexation capacities. Similar evidence has been presented w77x, especially for
ironIII. ions. Oxygen atoms of hydroxyl groups of
neighboring neutral sugars e.g. glucose. shall also
contribute to the coordinative binding of metal ions.
Thus, the formation of stable complexes is promoted.
The glucuronic acid content of the exopolymers provides, obviously, some selective ecological advantage, allowing the acidophilic iron oxidizers to attach
to and to grow on metal sulfides. It may even be
speculated that in other cases, like microbially influenced corrosion processes MIC., the glucuronic acid
components of the EPS of the relevant microorganisms have a comparable function in the adhesion
and, finally, in the biocorrosion process w83x.
173
the absence of iron ions w9,10,78,79x and the attachment of the bacterium to the mineral sulfide w66x
were used up to now to prove the existence of a
direct mechanism. However, the data presented here
clearly demonstrate that without iron ions T. ferrooxidans does not oxidize FeS 2 , MoS 2 and WS 2 ,
whereas the leaching of sulfides, like ZnS, CdS, NiS,
CoS, CuS, or Cu 2 S, is correlated with their solubility
products w9,10,16,79x. The addition of ironIII. ions
to the cultures generally enhanced the leaching rates.
Furthermore, it becomes obvious, why T. thiooxidans, a bacterium closely related to T. ferrooxidans,
but without ironII. ion oxidizing capacity, cannot
leach FeS 2 see above.. In contrast, acid leaching of
ZnS by T. thiooxidans has been confirmed here and
in previous studies w80,81x.
In the absence of iron ions T. ferrooxidans acts in
the same manner as T. thiooxidans by oxidation of
sulfur.. Consequently, the often cited AdirectB mechanism of metal sulfide leaching is nothing else than
the biological oxidation of the chemically formed
elemental sulfur to sulfate. This conclusion is also
supported by the recent finding that the solubilization of Cu2q from a copper ore is determined by the
sulfur oxidizing activity of T. ferrooxidans w82x.
Summarizing, the findings discussed here end in a
leaching model consisting only of the indirect thiosulfate or the indirect polysulfide mechanism. In
both cases, the EPS with their ironIII. ions, probably complexed by glucuronic acid residues, play a
pivotal role in the cell attachment to a metal sulfide
surface and the ensuing degradation. The composition of the EPS is adapted to the respective substratersubstratum. Consequently, the EPS constitute
an enlargement of the cells radius of action, and may
be considered as a special reaction compartment.
Future research, in order to enhance bio.leaching
for precious metal winning, or to inhibit bio.leaching for reducing the environmental impact, like acid
rock drainage, must focus on the biochemical reactions in the course of metal sulfide degradation.
Further research is needed to address the interfacial
processes occurring between EPS, complexed
ironIII. ions, and the metal sulfide. The latter clearly
needs input from sources like electrochemistry, solid
state physics, etc. From the present point of view,
this future work clearly has the potential to allow for
considerable achievements in bioleaching.
174
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the support of BMBF
UBA. and of DBU. The AFM images are a result of
a GermanHungarian cooperation UNG-013-97.
with E. Kalman, J. Telegdi, and Zs. Keresztes in
Budapest, Hungary.
References
w1x A. Schippers, W. Sand, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65 1999.
319.
w2x A.R. Colmer, M.E. Hinkle, Science 106 1947. 253.
w3x G. Rossi, Biohydrometallurgy, McGraw-Hill, Hamburg,
1990.
w4x G. Rossi, Fuel 72 1993. 1581.
w5x K. Bosecker, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 20 1997. 591.
w6x J.C. Bennett, H. Tributsch, J. Bacteriol. 134 1978. 310.
w7x W. Sand, T. Gehrke, R. Hallmann, A. Schippers, Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 43 1995. 961.
w8x H.L. Ehrlich, Geomicrobiology, Marcel Dekker, New York,
1996.
w9x H. Tributsch, J.C. Bennett, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 31
1981. 565.
w10x H. Tributsch, J.C. Bennett, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 31
1981. 627.
w11x F.K. Crundwell, Hydrometallurgy 21 1988. 155.
w12x R. Steudel, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35 1996. 1417.
w13x D.J. Vaughan, J.R. Craig, Mineral Chemistry of Metal Sulfides, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, USA, 1978.
w14x R.P. Hackl, D.B. Dreisinger, E. Peters, J.A. King, Hydrometallurgy 39 1995. 25.
w15x A.E. Torma, Hydrometallurgy and electrometallurgy of copper, in: W.C Cooper, D.J. Kemp, G.E. Lagos Eds.., Pergamon, New York, 1991, p. 73.
w16x T. Gehrke, J. Telegdi, D. Thierry, W. Sand, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 64 1998. 2743.
w17x V.P.B. Evangelou, Pyrite Oxidation and Its Control, CRC
Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995.
w18x A. Schippers, P.-G. Jozsa, W. Sand, Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol. 49 1998. 698.
w19x J.E. Dutrizac, R.J.C. MacDonald, Miner. Sci. Eng. 6 1974.
59.
w20x R.T. Lowson, Chem. Rev. 82 1982. 461.
w21x D.K. Nordstrom, Acid Sulfate Weathering, Pedogeochemistry and Relationship to Manipulation of Soil Minerals, in:
L.R. Hossner, J.A. Kittrick, D.F. Fanning Eds.., Soil Science Society of America Press, Madison, WI, USA, 1982, p.
37.
w22x C.O. Moses, D.K. Nordstrom, J.S. Herman, A.L. Mills,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 51 1987. 1561.
w23x P.C. Singer, W. Stumm, Science 167 1970. 1121.
175
w64x G.G. Geesey, L. Jang, Metal Ions and Bacteria, in: T.J.
Beveridge, R.J. Doyle Eds.., Wiley, New York, 1989.
w65x M. Seegerer, G. Osorio, C.A. Jerez, FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
138 1996. 129.
w66x V.K. Berry, L.E. Murr, Metallurgical Applications of Bacterial Leaching and Related Microbiological Phenomena, in:
L.E. Murr, A.E. Torma, J.A. Brierley Eds.., Academic
Press, New York, USA, 1978, p. 103.
w67x M.-A. Dziurla, W. Achouak, B.-T. Lam, T. Heulin, J.
Berthelin, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64 1998. 2937.
w68x D.J. Lane, A.P. Harrison Jr., D. Stahl, B. Pace, S.J. Giovannoni, G.J. Olsen, N.R. Pace, J. Bacteriol. 174 1992. 269.
w69x I.R. McDonald, D.P. Kelly, J.C. Murrell, A.P. Wood, Arch.
Microbiol. 166 1997. 394.
w70x D. Moreira, R. Amils, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47 1997. 522.
w71x S. Ehrich, D. Behrens, E. Lebedeva, W. Ludwig, E. Bock,
Arch. Microbiol. 164 1995. 16.
w72x R.C. Blake, E.A. Shute, M.M. Greenwood, G.H. Spencer,
W.J. Ingledew, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 11 1993. 9.
w73x R. Hallmann, A. Friedrich, H.-P. Koops, A. PommereningRoser, K. Rohde, C. Zenneck, W. Sand, Geomicrobiol. J. 10
1993. 193.
w74x R. Hallmann, PhD thesis, Universitat Hamburg, Hamburg,
Germany, 1996.
w75x J. Telegdi, Zs. Keresztes, G. Palinkas, E. Kalman, W. Sand,
Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 66 1998. 639.
w76x S. Douglas, T.J. Beveridge, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 26 1998.
79.
w77x E. Wasserman, A.R. Felmy, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64
1998. 2295.
w78x H. Sakaguchi, A.E. Torma, M. Silver, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 31 1976. 7.
w79x A.E. Torma, H. Sakaguchi, J. Ferment. Technol. 56 1978.
173.
w80x H.M. Lizama, I. Suzuki, Can. J. Microbiol. 37 1991. 304.
w81x O. Garcia, J.M. Bigham, O.H. Tuovinen, Can. J. Microbiol.
41 1995. 578.
w82x T. Sugio, F. Akhter, J. Ferment. Bioeng. 82 1996. 346.
w83x I.B. Beech, V. Zinkevich, T. Tapper, R. Gubner, R. Avci, J.
Microbiol. Methods 36 1999. 3.