Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
com
Abaqus/Explicit VUMAT for Bergstrom-Boyce Hysteresis Model
Viscoelastic rubber-like materials often exhibit hysteresis in cyclic loadings. This behavior arises
from the frictional sliding of the long molecules across one another. Bergstrom and Boyce [1]
observed in experiments that both filled and unfilled elastomers show significant amounts of
hysteresis during cyclic loading, and both filled and unfilled elastomers are strain-rate-dependent.
This document describes an Abaqus/Explicit user material model (VUMAT) that is largely
analogous to the functionality provided in the Abaqus/Standard hysteresis material model. Based on
the work of Bergstrom and Boyce [1], the model is meant for the simulation of large-strain, time-
dependent hysteretic behavior in rubber-like elastomers.
Hysteresis Material Model
The hysteresis material model for elastomers is based on [1]. The model decomposes the
mechanical behavior of the material into two parts. Using the analogy of a polymeric network, we
have an equilibrium, or purely elastic, response (network A) and a time-dependent deviation from
equilibrium (network B). The model is characterized by the schematic diagram in Figure 1:
Figure 1: Schematic of Bergstrom-Boyce hysteresis model.
The equilibrium network A corresponds to the state that is approached in long-time stress
relaxation tests. The time-dependent network B captures the nonlinear rate-dependent deviation from
the equilibrium state. The time dependence of network B is assumed to be governed by the repeated
motion of molecules that have the ability to significantly change configuration, thereby relaxing the
overall stress state.
An isotropic hyperelastic material model defines network A. The hysteresis material model
defines network B. The total stress of the model is assumed to be the sum of the stresses in the two
networks. The deformation gradient F is assumed to act on both networks. It is decomposed into
elastic (
) and inelastic (
and is governed by the same hyperelastic strain energy potential as network A. Given a deformation
gradient F acting on both networks, the elastic deformation gradient component
in network B is
obtained through an evolution equation,
1 1 e cr cr e cr B
B B B B B
B
S
F F F F
(2)
Where