Evaluation form project proposal individual project

Student name: Vinod Sudharshan

Decision: sufficient
General comments: .

P = poor, I = Insufficient, S = Sufficient, G = Good, E = Excellent
1. Company P I S G E
- There is enough IT or math expertise available in the
company.
- The company offers a suitable work environment.
- The company is trustworthy.

2. Project level P I S G E
- The difficulty of the project matches the
requirements of the individual project.
- Completing the project within the given timeframe
is realistic.
- The topic and type of the project are relevant for
the program.
The project now includes analysis of language
identification algorithms, which is a sufficient
mathematical component.
3. Document quality P I S G E
- The plan has a logical structure.
- Language is unambiguous and easy to read.
- Correct use of spelling and grammar.
- Layout is appropriate.
- Figures and tables are used appropriately.
- References are in accordance with APA style.

It is a very readable and elaborate proposal. The
structure is a bit unusual: most of the problem
description is in the theoretical background. For the
references the original journal/conference
publications should be used instead of the URLs.
4. Context description P I S G E
- All relevant aspects of the context are described.
- No irrelevant information is included.



5. Problem formulation P I S G E
- All relevant aspects pertaining to the problem
analysis are described.
- Research questions match the problem analysis.
- Research questions are formulated SMART.
- Subquestions cover the main question and are not
superfluous.
Clear description. Relevant and well-formulated
research questions. Small detail: the last
subquestion needs a main verb.
5. Project goals P I S G E
- The expected outcomes/products are clearly
described.
- The project goals logically follow from the problem
formulation.
- It is defined when the project is successful.
- The scope of the project is indicated.

6. Approach P I S G E
- The methodology, sources, and technology for each
subquestion are adequately described.
- Choices for methodologies, sources, and
technologies are motivated.
- Methodologies are appropriate for answering the
subquestions.
- Technologies are adequate given the context and
problem.
- Sources are relevant and of high enough level
Approach is appropriate.
7. Planning P I S G E
- Planning consists of activities rather than products.
- Planning is at the right level of detail.
- Planning is realistic.
- Planning contains all milestones.
- Steps in the planning match the approach.