Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services Department of Hygrothermics and Acoustics of Buildings
-Project- Hygrothermics and Acoustics of Buildings
2 Academic year 2012-2013
Subject: Case-study of Thermal/Acoustic Assessment and Upgrading (Refurbishment) of 2-Storey Dwelling made by Masonry Cross Walls and Pitched Roof Introduction: Prepare a Case-study and Conclusions from the Summary of Case-study for a High Insulated Dwelling, concerning the Assessment of its Thermal Performances, in Winter and Summer. The Aims: sustainability, new engineering competence as fresher expert in Energetic Audit Objectives are as follows: 1 To identify the building elements which affect the energy consumption of building. 2 To analyze the performances of these elements of the envelope. 3 To solve the different heat and mass transfer problems in building elements. 4 To evaluate the performances of building considering heat, mass, and acoustic transfer by: Assessing of Building Elements Thermal Performances using ISOVER-Building elements, OPAQUE Software; Evaluation of Condensation Risk using ISOVER-Building elements, WUFI Software; Simulation of Acoustic Measurements using ISOVER-Acoustics, ACOUBAT Software; Evaluation of Thermal Bridges Performances using KOBRA, RDM Software; Design of Windows Thermal Performances using WINDOW Software; Assessing of Building Thermal Performance using ISOVER-Building Performance Software; Assessing of Building Heat Energy Balance using CASAnova Software, Establish the Romanian Energetic Class of Dwelling.
Contents refers to: Drawings, Design Concept and Approach, Input Data, Computer Aided Design, Analytical Tools, Output Data, Conclusions, Environmental Impact, Engineering Solutions Output Data: Thermal Resistance, Thermal Transmittance, Dew Point Temperature, Level of Relative Humidity, Superficial/Interstitial Condensation Risk, Solar Heat Gain Coefficient, Influence Factors of Cold Bridges, Heat Losses, Heat Gains, Heat Loss Coefficient per Volume, Heating Ventilation Annual Consumption (HVAC), Primary Energy Demand, Standard Acoustic Level Difference. Checking for Performance Based Engineering: Sustainability is satisfied by Classified Energetic Scale of Building Thermal / Acoustic Comfort is satisfied by High Degrees of Users Satisfaction Environmental Protection is satisfied by Low Consumption of Primary Energy and Low Emission of Carbon Dioxide (CO2).
3 Academic year 2012-2013
Case-study Report has three main parts: To compute the heat, mass, and energy transfer for a poor-insulated house. To compute the heat, mass, energy, and acoustic transfer for a well-insulated house.
Well- insulated house: 1 Make an adjustment (refurbishment project) of the envelope elements by new insulating layers placed inside/outside using the ETICS (External Thermal Insulation Composite System) called the External Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS), in the USA and Canada or the External Wall Insulation Systems (EWIS), in the UK and Ireland. 2 Compute the new U-value (heat transfer coefficient) for walls, floor, roof, and basement elements such as slab above the basement or slab on the earth and basement walls (ISOVER-elements). 3 Compute the new U w -value (heat transfer coefficient for windows) (WINDOW). 4 Check for the risk of condensation (ISOVER-elements or WUFI). Place a retarder or a ventilated air layer. 5 Assess D nT -value (Standard acoustic level difference) (ISOVER-Acoustics or ACOUBAT). 6 Compute the R-value (2-D thermal resistance) and -value (linear coefficient) of thermal bridges effects before and after insulation (KOBRA or RDM). 7 Compute the EP-value (primary energy demand) for the entire building (CASAnova). 8 Classify the building on the energetic scale.
Input Data: new/old dwelling or project; year of building (Rmin); internal/external environment by destination and human comfort (Ti; RHi), climate of placement (Te; RHe), Northern-Eastern-Southern- Western solar position (Ir); neighborhoods such as buildings or forest (shadow factor); heating/cooling installation; type of fuel; design concept of structural system, subsystems, and components; real architectural shape in plan (layouts) and elevation, faades, and details; dimensions; gross built area with external dimensions except terraces and balconies; net useful total/heated/unheated areas with internal dimensions; number of floors; level of foundation, basement, ground floor, 1 st floor, roof level for outer garret/level of attic development up to knee-wall plus roof level for inner garret; no /partial/total basement; ground floor, 1 st floor, inner/outer garret, e.g. P+M means 2-storey or 2 stories house made by ground floor+inner garret; e.g. P+E+pod means 2-storey house made by ground floor+1 st floor+outer garret; each faade displayed in progress area of external walls up to outer garret level /up to level of inner garret roof as total /glazing /dense areas; position, structure, and material layers of the identified elements of the envelope; identified cold bridges by position, dimensions and materials; number of occupants; 1-D /2-D computation.
4 Academic year 2012-2013
Evaluation System for reaching the goal: To perform each stage / final case-study counted into 40% in the final mark To pass two test during the semester counted into 20% To make elective interventions granted with 10% To perform final Q/A counted into 30%.
References: 1 Romanian Norm C107/0-2002 revised in 2010 2 Architectural links www.icase.ro; www.arhitect.biz; www.casamea.ro 3 Software installed on the faculty platform (LC5 Laboratory): ISOVEREU Software (Saint-Gobain Isover SCE, France commissioned by Saint-Gobain Isover Hungaria LTD for English version, www.isover.ro/program-de-calcul-arhitecti-244.html free downloaded after registration at energysave@saint-gobain.com ), CASAnova Software (University of Siegen, DE, www.nesa1.uni- siegen.de/softlab/casanova_e.htm ), WINDOW 6.3 Software (University of California and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Software Group, USA), www.windows.lbl.gov/software/window/window.html free downloaded, www.cbe.berkeley.edu/research/facade_comfort.htm KOBRA Software (Physibel, Belgium), http://www.sts.bwk.tue.nl/bps/onderwijs/software/KOBRA/koudebruggen.htm KOBRA SOFTWAREPhysibel, 2002,EUROKOBRA DATABASEEUROKOBRA EEIG, 2002, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Nederland, http://www.softwaretopic.informer.com/download-kobra-physibel-free/ RDM Software (Institut National des Science Appliques, Rennes, France), RDM 5-IUT Le Mans, Elements finis. Manuel dutilisation, Yves Debard, Institut Universitaire de Technologie du Mans http://iut.univ-lemans.fr/ydlogi/doc/rdmmef.pdf ACOUBAT Software (CSTB Paris, France) Demonstration logiciel ACOUBAT Sound v6.0 www.cstb.fr/dae/en/nos-produits/logiciels.html and www.youtube.com/watch?v=QD7W4Gb-9rl user manual and license contract ftp://ftp.grenoble.cstb.fr/public/acoubat/acoubatsound2010-v6-std/ contact acoubat@cstb.fr for education institutes with a license server for a special rate.
5 Academic year 2012-2013
Energy Audit Report Private Building, Citadels Street, Fgra City, Braov County May 2013 Energetic Auditor: Ursachi Rzvan General Informations: The content of this report is the dwelling house situated in the Fgra City, Citadel Street. The purpose of this report is to evaluate through the energetic audit expertise, the fesability of the building to obtain the ENERGETIC EFFICIENCY CERTIFICATE An existing building energy expertise lies in determining ventilation and functional characteristics of the actual system building - thermal installations in order to characterize the energy point of view of the building. energy expertise to provide the necessary technical data for Energy Certificate.
Building energy certificate is an official document attesting the energy performance of the building and associated thermal installations. Energy Certificate completes the picture of the value of construction by "valence energy", being a document useful for the owner or the user of the building, the sale of shares, insurance, environmental fees, and more
The building is located in the town of Fgra,Citadel Street, facing to south (S) and east (E). The main entrance is oriented to the south (S), and a secondary entrance in the east (E).
House Presentation: The building was designed by the municipal architecture office, execution of the building being made in 2010-2012 (2010 - foundation, structure and in 2012 - the interior and exterior). The building is fully functional since October 2012.
6 Academic year 2012-2013
Private home building destination based on a custom project, tailored to local conditions and needs of the owner. The location of the building is defined by the following elements characteristic: part of climatic zone III as climate zoning map of Romania Figure Al of SR 19074 or Annex D of norm C107-2005 C107 Part 3/3. orientation to the cardinal points: the longitudinal axis of the building is SN and has inclination below 10 east from north. The 0.00 quote for limestone wall will be 50 inches higher than the rate of developed land. Surface ground Scs = 135 m2 and total area ground floor Sd = 211 m2 Heights of 2.80 m level is the maximum height to eaves of building is 5.60 m Maximum building height is 6.89 m Area of Roof: 170 mp The main facade to the N-E, with the main driveway entrance. Technology and Structure of the house: Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Minimum dimension to the ground: 9,62m x10,10m Infrastructure: continous foundation under the walls, foundation block (C6/7,5) + girdle (C 12/15), 100 cm thick. Reinforcing using PC 52 & OB 37 steel Suprastructure: masonry walls, reinforced concrete columns, and girdles; the material used in columns will be C12/15 concrete according to NE-012-1999 and PC 52, OB 37 reinforcement. The House includes two levels, the ground and the first floor, and there are positioned several rooms as follows: The ground floor: Dinning Room S=14,5mp / Kitchen S=10,6mp / Living Room S=15,6mp / Lobby S= 9,8mp / Bathroom S= 2,8mp / Staircase S=6,8mp The first floor: Bedroom 1 S=11,7mp / Bedroom 2 S=13,6mp / Bedroom 3 S= 15,7mp / Hall S= 12mp / Bathroom S=5,3mp 7 Academic year 2012-2013
To see how the rooms are positioned, check the ANEXES with the drawings at the end of this report The next pictures represents the site plan of the building
8 Academic year 2012-2013
Using the Romanian normatives I selected the most apropiate city for the coefficient of solar radiation which I will be using next. This is the Anexe from the Romanian Normative.
Fgra Situated on the III-rd climatic zone for winter period having Te = -18 degrees C a = 7,7 N12= 3930 D12= 227 Monthly mean temperature = -11 C
9 Academic year 2012-2013
Computations using Saint-Gobain ISOVER program
1. Input Data Geometry
10 Academic year 2012-2013
2. Transparent Elements 3. Indirect System 4. Solar Access
11 Academic year 2012-2013
5. Constructional Data 6. Building Use
12 Academic year 2012-2013
7. Output Data 8. Informative Data
13 Academic year 2012-2013
9. Energy Consumption
10. ISOVER CALCULATION
14 Academic year 2012-2013
Calculation of an Exposed Wall (External Insulation) Exposed Wall with Cladding
15 Academic year 2012-2013
Conclusion: after using the Saint-Gobain I sover computer program Building Thermal Performance - Calculation section: - from the Data Sheet of Vapour Difusion diagram we ensure that there is no risk for condensation in the case of this solution for the External Wall
16 Academic year 2012-2013
Computations using CASANOVA Heating and Cooling computer program
Length of north and south facade: 10,1 m Length of west and east facade: 9,6 m Height (without roof): 5,6 m Number of floors: 2 Height of roof: 1,3 Roof ridge: in north-south-direction Deviation from south direction (west positive): 0,0
Ground area: 97,0 m2 Useful area: 164,1 m2 Volume total: 543,0 m3 Air volume: 484,8 m3 Facade north resp. south: 56,6 m2 Facade east resp. west: 53,8 m2 Surface-to-volume value: 0,7 1/m
Insulation:
U values of the walls: north: 0,20 W/(m2 K) south: 0,20 W/(m2 K) east: 0,20 W/(m2 K) west: 0,20 W/(m2 K) Absorption coefficient of the walls: 0,50 Roof: Towards: outside air ventilated roof U value: 0,20 W/(m2 K) Lower floor: Towards: non-heated cellar (with insulation) U value: 0,20 W/(m2 K) Door (north facade): Area: 0,0 m2 U value: 1,50 W/(m2 K) Wrmebrcken: increase U-values of surrounding planes by 0.10 W/(m2 K) (normal construction)
Building:
Interior temperature: 22,0 C Limit of overheating: 30,0 C Ventilation: Natural ventilation (infiltration): 0,60 1/h Mechanical ventilation: 0,00 1/h 22 Academic year 2012-2013
Heat recovery (only mech. ventilation): 0 % efficiency factor of air conditioning: 2,5 kWh cool / kWh electr
Internal gains: 25,0 kWh/(m2 a) Kind of indoor walls: medium construction Kind of outdoor walls: medium construction
Climate:
Climate station: Bucuresti (Romania)
Windows:
North: Windows area: 7,4 m2 Fraction of windows area at the facade: 13,0 % Kind of windows: heat protection double glazing (U = 1.9 W/(m2 K)) U value glazing: 1,90 W/(m2 K) U value frame: 2,00 W/(m2 K) g value glazing: 0,70 Fraction of frame: 20,0 % Shading: 20,0 % South: Window area: 7,9 m2 Fraction of windows area at the facade: 14,0 % Kind of windows: heat protection double glazing (U = 1.9 W/(m2 K)) U value glazing: 1,90 W/(m2 K) U value frame: 2,00 W/(m2 K) g value glazing: 0,70 Fraction of frame: 20,0 % Shading: 20,0 % East: Window area: 2,7 m2 Fraction of windows area at the facade: 5,0 % Kind of windows: heat protection double glazing (U = 1.9 W/(m2 K)) U value glazing: 1,90 W/(m2 K) U value frame: 2,00 W/(m2 K) g value glazing: 0,70 Fraction of frame: 20,0 % Shading: 20,0 % West: Window area: 10,2 m2 Fraction of windows area at the facade: 19,0 % Kind of windows: heat protection double glazing (U = 1.4 W/(m2 K)) U value glazing: 1,40 W/(m2 K) U value frame: 1,50 W/(m2 K) g value glazing: 0,58 Fraction of frame: 20,0 % Shading: 20,0 %
Energy:
Heating system: biomass boiler, indirect thermal output, boiler and distribution inside the thermal zone Heat transfer / system temperature: radiators (outside walls), thermostatic valves (layout temperature: 1K), system temperature: 23 Academic year 2012-2013
Heat energy demand Cooling demand in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 ______________________________________________________________________________
January 22,4 0,0 February 18,5 0,0 March 13,0 0,0 April 5,2 0,0 May 0,5 0,0 June 0,0 0,2 July 0,0 0,7 August 0,0 0,5 September 0,2 0,0 October 5,5 0,0 November 15,4 0,0 December 21,2 0,0 ______________________________________________________________________________
Yearly sum 101,9 1,3
Heating and cooling hours:
Heating hours Zero energy hours Cooling hours in hours in hours in hours ______________________________________________________________________________
January 744 0 0 February 672 0 0 March 744 0 0 April 705 15 0 May 317 427 0 June 126 555 39 July 33 562 149 August 8 582 154 September 225 495 0 October 620 124 0 November 720 0 0 December 744 0 0 ______________________________________________________________________________
Sum (in hours) 5658 2760 342 Sum (in %) 64,6 31,5 3,9
Mean temperature Maximum temperature Minimum temperature in C in C in C ______________________________________________________________________________
January -1,0 12,8 -16,3 February 0,1 17,6 -14,1 March 5,6 22,3 -7,4 April 11,1 26,1 -5,6 May 16,7 31,3 -1,5 June 20,0 32,9 6,5 July 22,2 35,9 8,5 August 21,7 34,4 10,4 September 17,8 28,6 8,3 October 11,8 24,4 -3,0 November 4,5 19,4 -8,8 December 0,7 12,8 -12,6 ______________________________________________________________________________
Yearly mean 11,0
Building data:
Mean U value: 0,40 W/(m2 K) Specific transmission losses: 169,8 W/K Specific ventilation losses: 104,2 W/K Sum specific losses: 269,1 W/K Thermal inertia: 60,1 hours Maximum heating load: 9,6 kW Maximum specific heating load: 58,7 W/m2 Maximum cooling load: 4,5 kW Maximum specific cooling load: 27,4 W/m2 Limit temperature for heating: 20,2C Effective heating days: 287 Tage
Transm. Ventil. Internal Solar Usability Heat energy losses losses Gains Gains factor demand in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 ______________________________________________________________________________
January 16,4 10,9 2,1 2,7 1,00 22,4 February 14,1 9,4 1,9 3,0 1,00 18,5 March 11,6 7,7 2,1 4,2 1,00 13,0 April 7,5 5,0 2,0 5,3 0,96 5,2 May 3,8 2,5 1,4 4,4 0,68 0,5 June 1,4 0,9 0,5 1,7 0,26 0,0 July 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,00 0,0 August 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,04 0,0 September 2,9 1,9 1,2 3,3 0,60 0,2 October 7,3 4,8 2,1 4,5 0,97 5,5 November 12,0 8,0 2,1 2,6 1,00 15,4 December 15,1 10,1 2,1 1,9 1,00 21,2 ______________________________________________________________________________
Yearly sum 92,2 61,3 17,7 33,9 101,9
Absolute (total building):
Transm. Ventil. Internal Solar Usability Heat energy losses losses Gains Gains factor demand in kWh in kWh in kWh in kWh in kWh ______________________________________________________________________________
January 2685 1786 348 443 1,00 3679 February 2310 1536 315 496 1,00 3036 March 1907 1269 347 688 1,00 2141 April 1229 818 324 867 0,96 856 May 617 410 237 715 0,68 76 June 223 148 87 284 0,26 0 July 0 0 0 0 0,00 0 August 31 21 13 39 0,04 0 September 469 312 203 544 0,60 34 October 1193 794 338 739 0,97 909 November 1974 1313 337 430 1,00 2519 December 2485 1653 348 317 1,00 3473 ______________________________________________________________________________
Yearly sum 15123 10059 2897 5562 16723 26 Academic year 2012-2013
Cooling demand Cooling demand Mean Cooling degree specific absolute overheating hours in kWh/m2 in kWh in hours/day in Kh ______________________________________________________________________________
January 0,0 0 0,0 0,0 February 0,0 0 0,0 0,0 March 0,0 0 0,0 0,0 April 0,0 0 0,0 0,0 May 0,0 0 0,0 0,0 June 0,2 34 1,3 24,0 July 0,7 107 4,8 238,2 August 0,5 77 5,0 148,4 September 0,0 0 0,0 0,0 October 0,0 0 0,0 0,0 November 0,0 0 0,0 0,0 December 0,0 0 0,0 0,0 ______________________________________________________________________________
Heat: Heat energy demand: 101,9 kWh/(m2 a) Losses of the heat storage: 0,0 kWh/(m2 a) Heat losses from the distribution: 2,4 kWh/(m2 a) Looses at the transmission to the rooms: 1,1 kWh/(m2 a) Expense number of heat generation: 1,37
End energy demand wood: 144,8 kWh/(m2 a) Primary energy factor wood: 0,2 Primary energy demand wood: 29,0 kWh/(m2 a)
Auxiliary energy (electricity): Auxiliary energy for heat generation: 1,9 kWh/(m2 a) Auxiliary energy for heat storage: 0,0 kWh/(m2 a) Auxiliary energy for heat distribution: 1,2 kWh/(m2 a)
End energy demand auxiliary energy (electricity): 3,1 kWh/(m2 a) Primary energy factor electricity: 3,0 Primary energy demand auxiliary energy (electricity): 9,2 kWh/(m2 a)
End energy End energy End energy Primary Primary Primary demand demand demand demand demand demand wood electricity total wood electricity total in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 ______________________________________________________________________________
January 31,9 0,7 32,5 6,4 2,0 8,4 February 26,3 0,6 26,8 5,3 1,7 6,9 March 18,5 0,4 18,9 3,7 1,2 4,9 April 7,4 0,2 7,6 1,5 0,5 2,0 May 0,7 0,0 0,7 0,1 0,0 0,2 June 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 July 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 August 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 September 0,3 0,0 0,3 0,1 0,0 0,1 October 7,9 0,2 8,0 1,6 0,5 2,1 November 21,8 0,5 22,3 4,4 1,4 5,7 December 30,1 0,6 30,7 6,0 1,9 7,9 ______________________________________________________________________________
Efficiency factor of the air conditioning: 2,5 kWh cooling/ kWh electricity
Cooling demand End energy demand for cooling Primary energy demand in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 in kWh/m2 ______________________________________________________________________________
January 0,0 0,0 0,0 February 0,0 0,0 0,0 March 0,0 0,0 0,0 April 0,0 0,0 0,0 May 0,0 0,0 0,0 June 0,2 0,1 0,2 July 0,7 0,3 0,8 August 0,5 0,2 0,6 September 0,0 0,0 0,0 October 0,0 0,0 0,0 November 0,0 0,0 0,0 December 0,0 0,0 0,0 ______________________________________________________________________________
Yearly sum 1,3 0,5 1,6
29 Academic year 2012-2013
Analysis in WINDOW
30 Academic year 2012-2013
31 Academic year 2012-2013
32 Academic year 2012-2013
33 Academic year 2012-2013
Analysis in RDM5 computer program
34 Academic year 2012-2013
Final Conclusion of this Hygrothermic Project:
Energetic performance requirement is checked (R > Rmin)
We obtained a heat energy demand with a value of 101,9 kWh/(mp/a) which leads the house to the B class
Insulating materials applied to a traditional solution for a common house can substantially decrease the consumption of thermal energy, an important issue nowadays.
The house is efficiently by the energetic point of view