0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
12 vizualizări8 pagini
Uterine rupture is an uncommon complication of pregnancy associated with potentially catastrophic consequences for both mother and baby. Previous uterine surgery is the most common underlying cause. Multiparous women without uterine scarring are also at risk if labour becomes obstructed.
Uterine rupture is an uncommon complication of pregnancy associated with potentially catastrophic consequences for both mother and baby. Previous uterine surgery is the most common underlying cause. Multiparous women without uterine scarring are also at risk if labour becomes obstructed.
Uterine rupture is an uncommon complication of pregnancy associated with potentially catastrophic consequences for both mother and baby. Previous uterine surgery is the most common underlying cause. Multiparous women without uterine scarring are also at risk if labour becomes obstructed.
Review 2010;12:223230 10.1576/toag.12.4.223.27613 http://onlinetog.org The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
2010 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists ReviewUterine rupture: a revisit Authors Madhavi Manoharan / Rekha Wuntakal / Katrina Erskine Key content: Uterine rupture is an uncommon complication of pregnancy associated with potentially catastrophic consequences for both mother and baby. Previous uterine surgery is the most common underlying cause; however, multiparous women without uterine scarring are also at risk if labour becomes obstructed. A review of CEMACH reports has shown a consistent decrease in maternal mortality secondary to uterine rupture despite increasing caesarean section rates. The risk of uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section is widely recognised; however, there needs to be greater awareness of this emergency occurring in multiparous women undergoing induction/augmentation of labour. Learning objectives: To dene uterine rupture. To examine the causes and risk factors for antepartum and intrapartum uterine rupture. To review the signs and symptoms. To revise the management of uterine rupture. To increase awareness of this very serious complication and to suggest how clinicians can make a case-based individual assessment of uterine rupture risk. Ethical issues: Are those women at risk of uterine rupture adequately counselled about the possibility and potential consequences? Keywords CEMACH reports / maternal mortality / previous caesarean section / risk factors / scarred uterus / vaginal birth after caesarean Please cite this article as: Manoharan M, Wuntakal R, Erskine K. Uterine rupture: a revisit The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2010;12:223230. Author details Madhavi Manoharan MRCOG Clinical Fellow, Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Homerton Row, London E9 6SR, UK Email: madhumano70@yahoo.co.uk (corresponding author) Rekha Wuntakal MRCOG Specialist Registrar in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK Katrina Erskine MD MRCP MRCOG Consultant Gynaecologist Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK TOG12_4_223-230_Manoharan.qxd 10/1/10 9:25 AM Page 223 224 Review 2010;12:223230 The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2010 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 224 Introduction Uterine rupture is an uncommon but serious and sometimes tragic occurrence. It can result in serious complications for both mother and baby, such as haemorrhagic shock, the need for peripartum hysterectomy, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, permanent brain injury and even death. It occurs most commonly in women with a scarred uterus but this is not a prerequisite. Rupture of an unscarred uterus is unexpected and diagnosis may, therefore, be delayed. Outcomes in such cases are possibly worse than after scar rupture during vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). Denition Symptomatic or complete uterine rupture is dened as separation of the entire thickness of the uterine wall, with extrusion of fetal parts and intra-amniotic contents into the peritoneal cavity. 1 Uterine dehiscence is dened as a disruption of the uterine muscle with intact serosa. 2 This is usually asymptomatic. Diffentiation between the two terminologies has not been consistent in many studies. In a systematic review of uterine rupture by Guise et al. 3 the terms symptomatic and asymptomatic uterine rupture were used to distinguish between uterine rupture and dehiscence. Incidence Uterine rupture occurs at a frequency of 1% in women with a previously scarred uterus, with retrospective studies quoting rates of approximately 0.65%. 4 Rupture of an unscarred uterus is a rare event, with the incidence being reported as 1/12 960 deliveries to 1/17 000 (Table 1). 59 In contrast, a study from Nepal, 10 a developing country, quotes the incidence of uterine rupture as 0.09 % (1/1100 live births). This was a retrospective study spanning over 20 years (272 245 live births) in a busy tertiary centre with 16 000 deliveries a year and a caesarean section rate of 11%. There were 251 uterine ruptures (60% in an unscarred uterus, 29% in a scarred uterus and 11% were traumatic ruptures) with a mortality rate of 7.9%. Of the deaths, 2% occurred before intervention because of arrival in a moribund condition. Most women were multiparous, in their third or fourth pregnancy. The main concerns were poor or no antenatal care and failure to recognise the symptoms of uterine rupture. This wide variation in incidence between developed and developing countries is probably related to issues with access to care and inadequate intrapartum care. Risk factors for uterine rupture See Box 1. Antepartum Rupture during pregnancy is rarely reported from motor vehicle accidents. 11,12 It can also occur in women with a previously scarred uterus, particularly if this involves the upper segment, where it classically occurs before labour and before term. 13 Several cases of spontaneous rupture of the uterus during pregnancy following previous myomectomy have been reported. 14 No difference in adverse pregnancy outcomes such as uterine rupture was noted in a study comparing laparoscopic myomectomy with open myomectomy. 15 Larger series evaluation is needed to confirm this finding. The nulliparous uterus has been described as being virtually immune to rupture, 16 especially before the onset of contractions. Isolated case reports of rupture in primigravid women have been described in association with connective tissue disease such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, 17 chronic steroid use 17 and cocaine misuse. 18 Mllerian anomalies of the uterus 19 and abnormal placentation, especially placenta percreta, 20 have been associated with ruptured uterus and can occur from the second trimester. More recently, several less common risk factors such as previous difficult uterine curettage and Population Incidence of Study characteristics Denition Sample size uterine rupture Miller et al. (1997) 5 Included only women Only uterine rupture 16 849 deliveries 1in 16 849 deliveries retrospective review with unscarred uterus reported (0.006%) Or et al. (2003) 6 10% of women had Only complete rupture 117685 singleton 0.035% retrospective review previous scar reported deliveries Landon et al. (2004) 7 All LSCS and 1LSCS Both rupture and dehiscence 17898 deliveries 0.7% prospective study scars allowed reported separately Landon et al. (2006) 8 All women had LSCS scar Only uterine rupture Single previous 0.7% prospective study reported LSCS: 16 915 deliveries Multiple LSCS: 0.9% 975 deliveries Bashiri et al. (2008) 9 All had LSCS, multiple Only uterine dehiscence 7833 deliveries 1.03% retrospective review LSCS included reported LSCS lower segment caesarean section Table 1 Incidence of uterine rupture TOG12_4_223-230_Manoharan.qxd 10/1/10 9:25 AM Page 224 operative hysteroscopy (hysteroscopic metroplasty) have been identified, especially when they have been complicated by uterine perforation. 21 Women should be counselled regarding these risks and evaluation for residual damage with hysterography may be useful. Hysterography may demonstrate a defect or fistula in the uterine wall, which may be considered sufficient evidence to consider delivery by planned caesarean section and, in some cases, interval repair. 22 Intrapartum The most common risk factors for intrapartum rupture in an unscarred uterus are grand multiparity; fetal malpresentation, such as unrecognised brow, face and shoulder presentation; cephalopelvic disproportion; and oxytocin augmentation in multiparous women. Less common risk factors are assisted breech delivery, instrumental delivery (injudicious use of Kielland forceps), tumours obstructing the birth canal and pelvic deformity. 6 A number of case reports have been published detailing uterine rupture occurring in association with the use of misoprostol as an induction agent, in both primiparous and multiparous women. 23 Caution should be exercised with the use of misoprostol in multiparous women and in women with a previously scarred uterus, even in the context of intrauterine fetal death or termination of pregnancy. Intrapartum rupture is a well recognised complication of labour when a uterine scar exists. The risk is undoubtedly related to the site of the uterine scar and probably to the number of previous uterine surgeries (Table 2). 7,8,2426 A retrospective study 27 found that women with previous preterm caesarean section had the same risk of uterine rupture as women with previous term caesarean section, suggesting that gestation per se at the time of caesarean section does not influence subsequent rupture risk. In this study 98% of women had a lower tranverse incision. Whether method of closure (single/double layer) at the time of primary caesarean section has a role to play in the risk of subsequent rupture is not clear. The incidence of uterine rupture in women who had single-layer closure is one of the long-term outcomes being studied in the CAESAR study. The findings of this study are eagerly awaited. In the largest trial to date, single-layer closure was strongly associated with subsequent uterine rupture. 28 A case control study 29 has noted an increased risk of uterine rupture during VBAC in women who experienced postpartum fever following their previous caesarean delivery (odds ratio 4.0, 95% CI 1.015.5). Opinions are divided over the issue of rupture risk in labour following previous myomectomy. Recent retrospective analysis 225 Review 2010;12:223230 The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2010 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Box 1 Causes of uterine rupture During pregnancy Previous classical caesarean section Previous hysterotomy (very rare) Previous myomectomy Placenta accreta Motor vehicle accidents Mllerian anomalies of uterus Hysteroscopic metroplasty Difcult curettage for miscarriage Rare causes described in primigravida women EhlerDanlos syndrome Chronic steroid use Use of cocaine During labour Previous caesarean section Previous myomectomy Grand multiparity Malpresentation: unrecognised brow, face and shoulder presentation Unrecognised cephalopelvic disproportion Obstructed labour Prostaglandin and oxytocin augmentation in women with high parity and previous caesarean section Use of high doses of misoprostol in parous women Instrumental delivery (injudicious use of Kielland forceps) Assisted breech deliveries Rare causes Tumours obstructing the birth canal Pelvic deformity Post delivery Precipitate labour Manual removal of placenta Uterine manipulation (intrauterine balloon) Placenta accreta Site and type of uterine scar and number of previous uterine surgeries Incidence (%) One previous lower segment scar Landon et al. (2006) 8 0.7 SOGC (2005) 25 0.21.5 Two previous lower segment scars Caughey et al. (1999) 24 3.7 Previous low vertical incision Landon et al. (2004) 7 2 ACOG (2004) 26 17 SOGC (2005) 25 11.6 Unknown prior incision Landon et al. (2004) 7 0.5 Previous classical/inverted T/J-shaped incision Landon et al. (2004) 7 1.9 ACOG (2004) 26 49 Two or more previous caesarean births Landon et al. (2006) 8 0.9 ACOG American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; SOGC Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Table 2 Incidence of rupture in women with a scarred uterus TOG12_4_223-230_Manoharan.qxd 10/1/10 9:25 AM Page 225 shows that this group of women does have a greater risk of scar rupture. 30 The general opinion is that it is safe for women who have had previous myomectomy to aim for vaginal birth provided the endometrial cavity has not been breached, but the evidence base is sparse. 31 Induction of labour either with oxytocin or prostaglandins is an independent risk factor for uterine rupture in women with a scarred uterus (Table 3). 3236 Use of misoprostol as an induction agent in women with a previous scar is associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture of 5.6%. 37 Unlike prostaglandins or oxytocin, cervical ripening with transcervical Foley catheters in women with previous caesarean delivery is not associated with increased risk of uterine rupture. 38 Certain demographic factors have been identified as markers of higher rupture risk. Retrospective reviews of women attempting VBAC have shown that among the different racial groups, black women are 40% less likely to experience uterine rupture, 39 despite increased rates of VBAC attempt and VBAC failure. A possible explanation for this racial disparity is that it could be due to ethnic differences in pelvic connective tissue, as shown by differences in rates of pelvic organ prolapse 40 and collagen composition. 41 Women aged 30 years have a greater risk of uterine rupture than women aged 30 years, 42 although more recent studies have not shown this association. 6 Short interpregnancy interval (6 months) has been found to increase the risk of uterine rupture two to three-fold in women attempting trial of labour following caesarean delivery. 43 In a cohort study, Hammoud et al. 44 demonstrated that increasing gestational age of at least 41 weeks at the time of trial of labour was associated with a significantly higher rate of uterine rupture. Diagnosis Signs and symptoms of uterine rupture are varied. The woman can sometimes be asymptomatic: this occurs when the fetal sac herniates through an avascular scar and the uterus retracts. Prior to uterine rupture, the woman may exhibit restlessness and constant pain in the lower part of the uterus. She may become tachycardic and have tetanic uterine contractions with CTG abnormalities such as sudden and persistent bradycardia consistent with fetal compromise. The fetal parts may become difficult to palpate. Bandls ring is described as a late warning sign of impending rupture. It is a pathological retraction ring which demarcates the junction of the thinned lower uterine segment and the thick retracted upper uterine segment. Bandls ring usually appears before uterine rupture when it occurs secondary to obstructed labour. Following rupture, the woman may describe a sudden feeling of something giving way with complete cessation of uterine activity. On examination a loss of uterine contour may be identified and two swellings may be distinguished: one is the fetus lying in the abdominal cavity and the other is the contracted and retracted uterus. The fetal parts may then be easily palpable. Vaginal bleeding is a rare occurrence. Vaginal examination will reveal a receding presenting part. Bleeding into the abdominal cavity can be profuse and the woman may present with shock and collapse. The amount of bleeding depends on the location of the scar relative to the vessels. Rarely, rupture is recognised only after delivery of the baby and should be a differential diagnosis for postpartum collapse. If the rupture extends into the broad ligament, the woman can present with gradually increasing abdominal pain and a very tender abdominal mass. An abnormal cardiotocograph is present in 5587% of uterine ruptures, 3 with bradycardia being the most common fetal heart rate abnormality. No particular pattern of uterine activity is pathognomonic of uterine rupture, 45 although one case report described the staircase sign as characteristic of uterine rupture. This sign classically describes a stepwise gradual decrease in contraction amplitude followed by the sudden onset of profound and prolonged fetal bradycardia which can be demonstrated by both external and internal pressure transducers. 46 Uterine contraction pattern may 226 Review 2010;12:223230 The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2010 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Study Incidence of rupture Grossetti et al. (2007) 32 Not in labour 0.3% In spontaneous labour 1.0% Oxytocin-induced labour 1.4% Prostaglandin cervical ripening 2.2% Kwee et al. (2007) 33 PGE 2 alone or combined with oxytocin OR 6.8, 95% CI 3.214.3 augmentation Oytocin augmentation OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.045 Locatelli et al. (2006) 34 Prostaglandin and oxytocin induction 0.3% (no difference) Kayani and Alrevic (2005) 35 Induction of labour 2.4%, 95% CI 0.85.6 Yogev et al. (2004) 36 No difference noted OR odds ratio; PGE 2 prostaglandin E 2 Table 3 Risk of uterine rupture and induction/augmentation of labour in women with a previous low transverse scar TOG12_4_223-230_Manoharan.qxd 10/1/10 9:25 AM Page 226 differ depending on the presence or absence of a pre-existing scar or with the site and direction of rupture. This explains the contradictory reports in the literature. These are anecdotal reports and the practicality of routine use of intrauterine transducers is questionable. Management Diagnosis of uterine rupture warrants resuscitation and exploratory laparotomy. The importance of immediate senior involvement and teamwork cannot be overemphasised. Repair of the uterus is possible in the majority of women. In others, haemorrhage from extension of the rupture into the broad ligament or extensive damage to the uterus requires hysterectomy. Hysterectomy rates following uterine rupture have been quoted as 3.4/10 000 women choosing trial of labour following caesarean section. 3 The risk of hysterectomy following uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section is 413%. 4751 No difference has been noted in the rates of hysterectomy in pregnancies with uterine rupture in women with scarred and unscarred uterus. 1 Postoperative care is equally important as uterine rupture is associated with a high risk of bladder injury, massive transfusion because of haemorrhage, admission to intensive care, endometritis and longer hospital stay. A review of the literature found that 5% of symptomatic uterine ruptures were associated with perinatal mortality and that 7142 elective repeat caesarean sections were required to be performed to prevent one rupture-related perinatal death. The additional risk of perinatal death from rupture of uterine scar was 1.4/10 000. 3 Maternal death due to uterine rupture following trial of labour in a review of the literature (142 075 women) has been quoted as 0.002%. 52 In the same study, neonatal acidosis was seen in 0.15% and perinatal death in 0.04% as a consequence of uterine rupture. Significant neonatal morbidity can occur when 18 minutes have elapsed between the onset of prolonged deceleration and delivery. 53 Rupture occurring in an unscarred uterus is associated with high rates of fetal loss and higher rates of hysterectomy. 54 Rupture of a previously scarred uterus is usually incomplete and the tear is transverse, therefore, maternal and fetal prognosis is much better and repair of the uterus is often feasible. 55 Is it possible to predict uterine rupture antenatally? Several models for antepartum prediction of risk of failed VBAC and thus of possible uterine rupture have been formulated. Smith et al. 56 postulated a method similar to that used for trisomy 21 screening from risk factors identified in the antenatal period. They found that women with high predicted caesarean section risk also had a higher risk of uterine rupture (odds ratio for a 5% increase in predicted risk 1.22, 95% CI 1.141.31). A more user-friendly scoring system to quantify the risk of symptomatic uterine rupture based on factors identified at the first antenatal visit has been reported. 57 Risk factors identified early in pregnancy such as an inter-delivery interval of 18 months, maternal age of 3039 years, maternal age 40 years, two or more prior caesareans and prior vaginal delivery are assigned numerical scores ranging from 1 to 2. The rate of uterine rupture varies by the total score: 1 0.26%; 0 0.25%; 1 1.11%; 2 2.43%; 3 3.70%; and 4 14.29%, P 0.001. Measurement of the thickness of the lower uterine segment by ultrasound in the third trimester can be performed and a value of 3.5 mm has been found to carry a significant negative predictive value (99.3%). 58 This was a prospective observational study of 642 women in France which found that the risk of uterine rupture and dehiscence was directly related to thinning of the lower segment at around 37 weeks. With a positive predictive value of only 11.8%, however, further studies are warranted. There is no evidence that measurement of thickness of the lower segment is superior to careful clinical practice in the prevention of uterine rupture. Moreover, all the ultrasound examinations and interpretation in this study were carried out by a single investigator. Hence questions regarding the reproducibility and accuracy of ultrasonic assessment of scar thickness in routine clinical practice have been raised. 59 Is it possible to predict uterine rupture during labour? Use of a simple tool such as the partograph in the prediction of uterine rupture has been reinforced by Khan and Rizvi. 60 They predicted that the partographic zone 23 hours after the alert line in women undergoing trial of labour following caesarean section represents a time of high risk of rupture. Women attempting VBAC should, therefore, be closely observed for progression of labour. Recognition of active 227 Review 2010;12:223230 The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2010 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists TOG12_4_223-230_Manoharan.qxd 10/1/10 9:25 AM Page 227 phase arrest disorders, in both multiparous women and those aiming for VBAC, should prompt senior obstetric involvement and a careful riskbenefit analysis of continuing the labour against immediate delivery by caesarean section, or instrumental birth if appropriate. Many would consider these situations as an absolute contraindication to the use of oxytocin augmentation. Clinical judgement is very important in the diagnosis of uterine rupture, as no scoring system is totally reliable in predicting the risk. Pregnancy following uterine rupture If the uterine rupture is confined to the lower segment, the risk of rupture in a future pregnancy is 6%; if the rupture involves the upper segment, the risk is increased to 32%. 61 Women who have had a previous uterine rupture are, therefore, advised to give birth by repeat caesarean section prior to onset of labour. Maternal mortality Maternal death from uterine rupture is rare. The rate is less than 1/100 000 cases in women having a trial of labour in the developed world. 62 Causes of maternal death as detailed in the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) (19552005) are briefly summarised in Table 4. With an increasing caesarean section rate the worry is that there will be an increase in the incidence of uterine rupture in a scarred uterus. Fortunately, this has not been the case in the UK because of increased awareness and meticulous monitoring. The present trend appears to be for rupture, when it happens, to occur in an unscarred uterus with the use of prostaglandins and non-recognition of the warning signs and symptoms. For example, the CEMACH report of 20002002 63 describes the case of a woman who had induction of labour with prostaglandins and went on to have a precipitous labour and forceps delivery. Subsequently, she collapsed and on laparotomy a uterine tear was noted. She underwent hysterectomy but died after several days in intensive care. The CEMACH report of 20032005 64 reported one death from uterine rupture. High doses of prostaglandin E 2 were given to a parous woman with previous precipitous labour. In this induced labour she also laboured extremely quickly and a fetal bradycardia was followed by rapid delivery. Subsequently, she became haemodynamically unstable because of massive intra-abdominal haemorrhage. Laparotomy with hysterectomy was performed but she died later. Uterine rupture can be prevented if women are assessed for risk factors antenatally and a plan for delivery is documented in the notes. Risk management Despite the remote risk of uterine rupture in grand multiparous women and those attempting trial of labour following caesarean delivery and the lesser subsequent risks of maternal or fetal death from this catastrophe, the gravity of these risks warrants detailed discussion. In view of the increased risk of ruptured uterus in women with previous caesarean delivery undergoing induction of labour with prostaglandins or oxytocin, the decision to proceed should only be made after obtaining a fully informed consent. In addition, the process of obtaining informed consent must be secured without coercion. Many obstetric units in the UK consider it prudent to avoid using prostaglandins to induce and oxytocin to induce and augment labour in women undergoing a trial of VBAC. Delivery should be offered to women in a hospital setting where timely operative delivery is available; this includes availability of obstetric, anaesthetic, paediatric and theatre staff. 25 Prior successful VBAC offers some protection from uterine rupture, as shown in a large prospective multicentre study. 65 Risk of uterine rupture decreased after one successful VBAC and did not change substantially with additional prior VBAC. Women with one or more prior successful VBAC attempts were found to have 228 Review 2010;12:223230 The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2010 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Number of cases Year of uterine rupture Causes of rupture and death 19551957 33 Obstructed labour/uterine manipulation (5VBAC, 2MRP, 8 multiparas) 19641966 30 Obstructed labour/traumatic delivery 19671969 19 9 traumatic, 8 spontaneous, 2 scar ruptures. Delay performing laparotomy in suspected cases 19731975 11 Inappropriate use of oxytocin 19781981 4 All in women with scarred uterus, with delay in diagnosis and performing caesarean section 19911993 4 Genital tract trauma including uterine rupture. Inadequate supervision of junior doctors 19941996 5 Use of prostaglandin in women with scarred uterus, failure to identify intraperitoneal bleeding in a known case of placenta accreta. Two occurred in primigravidae: one had a traumatic vaginal delivery and the other presented in early labour with hypovolaemic shock 19971999 1 Failure to identify uterine rupture following ventouse delivery in a woman undergoing trial of scar 20002002 1 Prostaglandin for IOLand precipitous labour 20032005 1 Use of repeated doses of prostaglandin E 2 in a parous woman IOLinduction of labour; MRPmanual removal of placenta; VBAC vaginal birth after caesarean Table 4 Summary of causes of maternal death from uterine rupture 19552005 TOG12_4_223-230_Manoharan.qxd 10/1/10 9:25 AM Page 228 approximately half the risk of uterine rupture of those attempting their first VBAC (0.40.5% compared with 0.9%). Thus, successive labours in women with previous caesarean delivery do not place additive or multiplicative strain on the uterine scar. This is important in counselling women who are planning VBAC. Clinical management decisions ultimately rest with the woman; our role as clinicians is to convey accurate information that will assist women to make informed decisions. The final decision should also take into consideration any wish for future pregnancies. Conclusion Uterine rupture is a rare complication but it has potentially catastrophic implications for both mother and baby. It is associated with high maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. In theory, an increase in uterine rupture is expected with increasing caesarean section rates. This has not been the case in the UK because of increased vigilance, rigorous monitoring in labour and the adoption of strict interventional criteria. In the past, parous women with an intact uterus have been overlooked and this is reflected in the maternal deaths due to uterine rupture in the last two CEMACH reports. 63,64 The aim should be to prevent this serious complication from occurring. The authors believe that this can only be achieved by increasing awareness among doctors and midwives and counselling women adequately. Both doctors and midwives require adequate training to detect the early warning signs and symptoms of uterine rupture, as they are non-specic. Equally important is the assessment of risk factors for uterine rupture, both antenatally and in the intrapartum period. The authors suggest that this should be agged up in the antenatal notes, including a plan for delivery and use of prostaglandins for induction of labour. Caution should be exercised during oxytocin augmentation, especially in poorly progressing multiparous women and those with a history of prior caesarean section. Senior input is vital in these decisions. References 1 Or K, Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M. Uterine rupture: differences between a scarred and an unscarred uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191,425-9. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.026 2 Hamar BD, Levine D, Katz NL, Lim KH. Expectant management of uterine dehiscence in the second trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:113942. 3 Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BK, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 2004;329:1925. 4 Wen SW, Rusen ID, Walker M, Liston R, Kramer MS, Basket T, et al. Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labour and elective caesarean section among women with previous caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:12639. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.022 5 Miller DA, Goodwin TM, Gherman RB, Paul RH. Intrapartum rupture of the unscarred uterus. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:6713. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00073-2 6 Or K, Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M. Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:10426. doi:10.1067/S0002-9378(03)01052-4 7 Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labour after prior caesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:25819. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040405 8 Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Hauth JC, Bloom SL, Varner MW, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1220. 9 Bashiri A, Burstein E, Rosen S, Smolin A, Sheiner E, Mazor M. Clinical signicance of uterine scar dehiscence in women with previous caesarean delivery: prevalence and independent risk factors. J Reprod Med 2008;53:814. 10 Padhye SM. Rupture of the pregnant uterus: a 20 year review. Kathmandu University Medical Journal 2005;3:2348. 11 Vaysse C, Mignot F, Benezech JP, Parant O. Traumatic uterine rupture: a rare complication of motor vehicle accidents during pregnancy. A case report. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2007;36:6114. Epub 2007Jun 14. 12 Weir LF, Pierce BT, Vazquez JO. Complete fetal transection after a motor vehicle collision. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:5302. 13 Halperin ME, Moore DC, WHannah WJ. Classical versus low-segment transverse section: maternal complications and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95:990996. 14 Parker WH, Lacampo K, Long T. Uterine rupture after laparoscopic removal of a pedunculated myoma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:3624. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2006.10.024 15 Soriano D, Dessolle L, Poncelet C, Benia JL, Madelenat P, Darai E. Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic and laparoconverted myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;108:1948. 16 ODriscoll K, Meagher D, Robson M. Active Management of Labour: The Dublin Experience. 4th ed. London: Mosby; 2004. 17 Gelbmann CM, Kollinger M, Gmeinwieser J, Leser HG, Holstege A, Scholmeric J. Spontaneous rupture of lever in a patient with Ehlers Danlos disease type IV. Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:172430. doi:10.1023/A:1018869617076 18 Gonsoulin W, Borge D, Moise KJ Jr. Rupture of unscarred uterus in primigravid woman in association with cocaine abuse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:5267. 19 Kore S, Pandole A, Akolekar R, Vaidya N, Ambiye VR. Rupture of the left horn of bicornuate uterus at twenty weeks of gestation. J Postgrad Med2000;46:3940. 20 LeMaire WJ, Louisy C, Dalassendri K, Muschenheim F. Placenta percreta with spontaneous rupture of an unscarred uterus in the second triemster. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:9279. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(01)015800 21 Reed WC. Large uterine defect found at caesarean section. A case report. J Reprod Med 2003;48:602. 22 Deaton JL, Maier D, Andreoli J Jr. Spontaneous uterine rupture during pregnancy after treatment of Ashermans syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:13523. 23 Khabbax AY, Usta IM, El-Hajj MI, Abu-Musa A, Seoud M, Nassar AH. Rupture of an unscarred uterus with misoprostol induction: case report and review of literature. J Maternal Fetal Med 2001;10:1415. 24 Caughey AB, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Zelop CM, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Rate of uterine rupture during trial of labour in women with one or two prior caesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:8726. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70317-0 25 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005;89:31931. 26 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetricians- Gynaecologists. Number 54, July 2004. 27 Kwee A, Smink M, Van Der Laar R, Bruinse HW. Outcome of subsequent delivery after a previous early preterm caesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007;20:337. doi:10.1080/14767050601036527 28 Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton EF, Harel F, Gauthier RJ. The impact of single layer or double layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:132630. doi:10.1067/mob.2002.122416 29 Shipp TD, Zelop C, Cohen A, Repke JT, Lieberman E. Post-caesarean delivery fever and uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labour. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:1369. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02319-0 30 Kelly BA, Bright P, Mackenzie IZ. Does the surgical approach used for myomectomy inuence the morbicity in subsequent pregnancy? J Obstet Gynecol 2008;28:7781. doi:10.1080/01443610701811738 31 Landi S, Zaccoletti R, Ferrari L, Minelli L. Laparoscopic myomectomy: technique, complications and ultrasound scan evaluations. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001;8:23140. doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60583-X 32 Grossetti E, Vardon D, Creveuil C, Herlicoviez M, Dreyfus M. Rupture of the scarred uterus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:5728. doi:10.1080/00016340701257141 33 Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;132:1716. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.07.017 34 Locatelli A, Ghidini A, Ciriello E, Incerti M, Bonardi C, Regalia AL. Induction of labour: comparison of a cohort with uterine scar from previous caesarean section vs a cohort with intact uterus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:4715. doi:10.1080/14767050600746654 229 Review 2010;12:223230 The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2010 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists TOG12_4_223-230_Manoharan.qxd 10/1/10 9:25 AM Page 229 35 Kayani S, Alrevic Z. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section. BJOG2005;112:4515. 36 Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Lahav E, Horowitz E, Hod M, Kaplan B. Induction of labour with prostaglandin E2in women with previous caesarean section and unfavourable cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;116:173-6. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.02.019 37 Plaut MM, SchwartzML, Lubarsky SL. Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous caesarean section. Am J Obstet Gyncecol 1999;180:153542. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70049-9 38 Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Gauthier RJ. Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1823. 39 Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Peipert J, Stevens E, Macones GA. Racial disparity in the success and complications of vaginal birth after caesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:6548. 40 Howard D, Delancey JO, Tunn R, Ashton-Miller JA. Racial differences in the structure and function of the stress urinary continence mechanism. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:7137. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00786-9 41 Leppert PC, Catherino WH, Segars JH. A new hypothesis about the origin of uterine fibroids based on gene expression profiling with microarrays. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:41520. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.059 42 Shipp TD, Zelop C, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E. The association of maternal age and symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:5858. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01792-6 43 Stamilio DM, DeFranco E, Pare E, Odibo AO, Peiper JF, Allsworth JE, et al. Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:107582. 44 Hammoud A, Hendler I, Gauthier RJ, Berman S, Sansregret A, Bujold EJ. The effect of gestational age on trial of labour after caesarean section. Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:2026. doi:10.1080/14767050410001668329 45 Phelan JP, Korst LM, Settles DK. Uterine activity patterns in uterine rupture: a case control study. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:3947. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00232-4 46 Matsuo K, Scanlon JT, Atlas RO, Kopelman JN. Staircase sign: a newly described uterine contraction pattern seen in rupture of unscarred gravid uterus. J Obstet Gynecol Res 2008;34:1004. 47 McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, Olsham AF. Comparison of a trial of labour with an elective caesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996;335:68995. doi:10.1056/NEJM199609053351001 48 Duff P, Southmayd K, Read JA. Outcome of trial of labour in patients with a single previous low transverse caesarean section for dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:3804. 49 Flamm BL, Lim OW, Jones C, Fallon D, Newman LA, Mantis JK. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: results of a multicentre study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:107984. 50 Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, Wolde-Tsadik G. Elective repeat caesarean delivery versus trial of labour: a prospective multicentre study. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:92732. doi:10.1056/NEJM199609053351001 51 Flamm BL, Newman LA, Thomas SJ, Fallon D, Yoshida MM. Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: results of a 5year multicentre collaborative study. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:7504. doi:10.1097/00006250-199011000-00004 52 Chauhan SP, Martin JN Jr, Henrichs CE, Morrison JC, Magann EF. Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075patients who attempted vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:408-17. doi:10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00675-6 53 Leung AS, Leung EK, Paul RH. Uterine rupture after previous caesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:94550. 54 Lao TT, Leung BF. Rupture of the gravid uterus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1987;25:17580. doi:10.1016/0028-2243(87)90096-7 55 Golan A, Sandbank O, Rubin A. Rupture of the pregnant uterus. Obstet Gynecol 1980;56:54954. 56 Smith GC, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section. PLoS Med 2005;2:e252. Epub 2005Sep 13. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020252 57 Shipp TD, Zelop C, Lieberman E. Assessment of the rate of uterine rupture at the rst prenatal visit: a preliminary evaluation. J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:12933. doi:10.1080/14767050801891606 58 Rozenberg P, Gofnet F, Phillippe HJ, Nisand I. Echographic measurement of the inferior uterine segment for assessing the risk of uterine rupture. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1997;26:5139. 59 Turner M. Uterine rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002;16:6979. doi:10.1053/beog.2001.0256 60 Khan KS, Rizvi A. The partograph in the management of labour following caesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1995;50:1517. doi:10.1016/0020-7292(95)02431-B 61 Ritchie EH. Pregnancy after rupture of the pregnant uterus. A report of 36 pregnancies and a study of cases reported since 1932. J Obstet Gynecol Br Common 1971;78:6428. 62 Wen SW, Rusen ID, Walker M, Liston R, Kramer MS, BaskettT, et al. Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labour and elective caesarean section among women with previous caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:12639. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.022 63 Lewis G; CEMACH. Why Mothers Die 20002002. The Sixth Report of the Condential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: RCOG Press; 2004. 64 Lewis G, editor. The Condential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Saving Mothers Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to Make Motherhood Safer 20032005. The Seventh Report on Condential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH; 2007. 65 Mercer BM, Gilbert S. Labour outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:28591. 230 Review 2010;12:223230 The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2010 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists TOG12_4_223-230_Manoharan.qxd 10/1/10 9:25 AM Page 230