0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
30 vizualizări7 pagini
The document summarizes research purifying and characterizing the DNA polymerase from Thermus filiformis (Tfi). Key points:
1) Researchers cloned and expressed the gene for Tfi DNA polymerase in E. coli.
2) They purified the recombinant Tfi DNA polymerase using heat treatment and ion exchange chromatography.
3) Testing showed the purified enzyme has optimal activity at pH 8.4-9.0 and 70-72.5°C, and is activated by Mg2+ and Mn2+ ions.
The document summarizes research purifying and characterizing the DNA polymerase from Thermus filiformis (Tfi). Key points:
1) Researchers cloned and expressed the gene for Tfi DNA polymerase in E. coli.
2) They purified the recombinant Tfi DNA polymerase using heat treatment and ion exchange chromatography.
3) Testing showed the purified enzyme has optimal activity at pH 8.4-9.0 and 70-72.5°C, and is activated by Mg2+ and Mn2+ ions.
The document summarizes research purifying and characterizing the DNA polymerase from Thermus filiformis (Tfi). Key points:
1) Researchers cloned and expressed the gene for Tfi DNA polymerase in E. coli.
2) They purified the recombinant Tfi DNA polymerase using heat treatment and ion exchange chromatography.
3) Testing showed the purified enzyme has optimal activity at pH 8.4-9.0 and 70-72.5°C, and is activated by Mg2+ and Mn2+ ions.
Purication and properties of Thermus liformis DNA polymerase expressed in Escherichia coli Jeong Jin Choi, Seung Eun Jung, Hyun-Kyu Kim and Suk-Tae Kwon 1 Department of Genetic Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 300 Chunchon-Dong, Jangan-Ku, Suwon 440-746, Korea The gene encoding Thermus liformis (T) DNA poly- merase was expressed under the control of the tac pro- moter on a high-copy plasmid, pJR, in Escherichia coli. The T DNA polymerase was puried by using heat treatment and DEAE-Sephacel column chromato- graphy. The puried enzyme had a molecular mass of 92 kDa, as estimated by SDS/PAGE. The optimum pH and temperature of the enzyme were 8.49.0 and 7072.5 mC respectively. The half-life of the enzyme at 94 mC was approx. 40 min. The enzyme was activated by the bivalent cations, Mg 2 + andMn 2 + , andwas inhibited by EDTA. The optimal Mg 2 + concentration of the enzyme was 4 mM. The optimal conditions for the PCR reaction were slightly different from those for the enzyme activity except for the optimal Mg 2 + concen- tration. Low concentrations of KCl had no effect on either the enzymic activity or the PCR amplication. The result of the PCRexperiment withthe enzyme indi- cates that T DNA polymerase might be useful in DNA amplication. Introduction PCR has become a powerful method for the identication and amplication of genes, for direct sequencing and for clinical diagnosis. In particular the uses of PCR in clinical diagnosis are broadening to include diagnoses of new mutation and monogenic disease, the analysis of biological evidence and the detection of oncogenes and human infectious disease [1]. Early PCR experiments used the thermolabile Klenow fragment, which had to be added to every cycle [2]. The introduction of a thermostable DNA polymerase allowed the automation of the process [3]. A thermostable DNA polymerase was much more suitable for the thermocycles during PCR [1,3]. Accordingly, a thermo- stable DNA polymerase has become an indispensable component of PCR technology. Thermostable DNA polymerase was rst isolated from the thermophilic bacterium Thermus aquaticus YT-1 (Taq DNA polymerase) ; its properties were reported in [4,5]. Similar enzymes have been isolated from other Thermus strains, including T. avus [6], T. thermophilus HB-8 [7] and T. caldophilus GK24 (TcaDNA polymerase) [8]. Each enzyme has slightly different characteristics; however, no informa- tion is available on the properties of the thermostable DNA polymerase from T. liformis (T DNA polymerase). T. liformis was isolated from a New Zealand hot spring and described as member of the genus Thermusby Hudson et al. [9]. T. liformis always forms long laments consisting of chains of cells and can thus be distinguished from other Thermus strains in morphology. The TDNApolymerase gene has recently been cloned and sequenced [10]. The amino acid sequence of T DNA polymerase was deduced from the nucleotide sequence of the cloned gene. T DNA polymerase is composed of 833 amino acid residues and has a molecular mass of 93890 Da. The deduced amino acid sequence of T DNA polymerase showed a high sequence similarity to Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I-like DNA polymerases. Here we report (1) the expression of the gene for T DNA polymerase, (2) the purication and properties of T DNA polymerase and (3) the optimal conditions for PCR with T DNA polymerase. Materials and methods Bacterial strains and culture conditions T. liformis (ATCC no. 43280) [9] was prepared as described by Ramaley and Hixson [11]. E. coli strain MV1184 [12] was used as the host for plasmid preparations. The E. coli cells were grown in LuriaBertani medium at 37 mC. The plate was solidied with 1.5% (w\v) agar; ampicillin (100 g\ml) was added when needed. Molecular cloning of the gene for T DNA polymerase Most of the methods used for molecular cloning were based on those of Sambrook et al. [12]. Genomic DNA of T. liformis and plasmid DNA were isolated by a method modied from that of Marmur [13] and a modied alkaline lysis method [12] respectively. A 2.5 kb fragment containing the whole T DNA polymerase gene was prepared by PCR Abbreviations used: DTT, dithiothreitol ; Taq DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase isolated from Thermus aquaticus YT-1; Tca DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase isolated from Thermus caldophilus GK24; Tfi DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase isolated from Thermus filiformis. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. # 1999 Portland Press Ltd 20 J. J. Choi and others Figure 1 Construction of the recombinant plasmid pTFP11 The Tfi DNA polymerase gene, amplified by PCR with the T. filiformis genomic DNA as a template DNA, was introduced into an expression vector pJR by using the EcoRI and SalI sites. Abbreviations : E, EcoRI ; S, SalI. amplication with the T. liformis genomic DNA and primers that annealed to opposite ends of the coding region, on the basis of the published sequence of the gene [10]. The 5h (N- terminal) primer sequence was 5h-NNNNGAATTCNATG- ACCCCACTTTTTGACC-3h, and the 3h (C-terminal) primer sequence was 5h-NNNNGTCGACTCAATCC- TGCTTCGC-3h, which created the underlined unique EcoRI and SalI restriction enzyme sites respectively, at each end of the amplied DNA fragment. The amplied product by PCR was digested with EcoRI and SalI ; the 2.5 kb DNA fragment was isolated from the low-melting-temperature agarose gel. The fragment was ligated into an expression vector pJR [14] that had been digested with EcoRI and SalI, giving a fusion that used the tac promoter, the ribosome- binding site and a transcription terminator from the vector. The ligate was transformed into E. coli MV1184 as described by Hanahan [15]. The correct construction of the expression vector for the T DNA polymerase gene was identied by restriction enzyme analysis of plasmid minipreps. The resulting recombinant plasmid pTFP11 (Figure 1) possessed 11 bp between the ShineDalgarno sequence [16] and an ATG codon. T DNA polymerase activity assay The basic reaction mixture (50 l) contained 25 mM Tris\ HCl, pH 8.5, 40 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl 2 , 1 mM 2-mercapto- ethanol, 100 MdATP, 100 MdCTP, 100 MdGTP, 10 M dTTP including 0.5 Ci [methyl-1h,2h- 3 H]thymidine 5h-tri- phosphate, 1.25 g of activated calf thymus DNA, and enzyme solution. The mixture was incubated for 10 min at 75 mC [8]. The mixture was spotted on a DE-81 lter paper disk (23 mm), dried on a heat block, then washed with 0.5 M Na 2 HPO 4 , pH 7.0, for 10 min. This was followed by a wash with 70% (v\v) ethanol for 5 min. A dry lter paper disk was used to measure the amount of [ 3 H]dTTP incorporation with a Beckman LS 6500 scintillation system. One unit of enzyme is dened as 1 pmol of product synthesized in 10 min at 75 mC. Purication of the expressed T DNA polymerase in E. coli A 40 ml sample of an overnight culture of E. coli MV1184 harbouring the recombinant plasmid pTFP11 grown in LuriaBertani broth containing ampicillin was transferred to 4 litres of the same medium, and the culture was incubated at 37 mC. When the A 600 of the culture had reached approx. 0.6, the culture was induced by the addition of isopropyl - D-thiogalactoside at a nal concentration of 0.2 mM, then incubated at 37 mC for 6 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellet was resuspended in buffer A [10 mM Tris\HCl (pH 8.0)\1 mM MgCl 2 ] containing 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 1 mM PMSF, then disrupted by sonication. The sonicated cells were centrifuged at 10000 g for 20 min to remove E. coli cell debris. The nucleic acids in the supernatant were precipitated for 30 min by 1% (w\v) streptomycin sulphate at room temperature, then removed by centrifugation. The supernatant was incubated in a water bath at 80 mC for 30 min to denature E. coli proteins. After removal of the denatured proteins by centrifugation at 10000 g for 20 min, the supernatant was dialysed against buffer A, then applied to a DEAE-Sephacel2 column that had been equilibrated with buffer A. The elution of adsorbed protein was performed with a linear gradient of KCl (00.5 M) in buffer A. The fractions showing DNA poly- merase activity were pooled and dialysed against buffer A. The puried T DNA polymerase was then analysed and assayed. Protein determination and electrophoretic analysis Protein concentration was determined by the procedure of Lowry et al. [17], with BSA as a standard. SDS\PAGE was performed by the method of Laemmli [18] with 7% (w\v) polyacrylamide. # 1999 Portland Press Ltd Properties of Thermus liformis DNA polymerase 21 Primers and PCR conditions for searching optimal condition of PCR Oligodeoxynucleotide primers that annealed to -phage DNA [19] were designed to give 2, 4 and 6 kb amplied DNAfragments by PCR. The sequences of the primers were as follows: primer 1 (20012020), 5h-CGCCACGACGAT- GAACAGAC-3h (forward) ; primer 2 (39814000), 5h- CACTGGCCCGTGCCGTGGAG-3h (reverse) ; primer 3 (59806000), 5h-TCCTCATAACGGAACGTGCCG-3h (re- verse) ; primer 4 (79928013), 5h-GGTTTTCAACGGCC- TGCTCAAG-3h (reverse). The numbers in parentheses indicate the position of the -phage DNA. PCR mixture (50 l) contained 2.5 pmol of primers, each dNTP at 200 M, 1 unit of TDNA polymerase, and - phage DNA as a template DNA. After a single 5 min denaturation step at 95 mC, PCR (25 cycles) was done by 1 min of denaturation at 94 mC, 1 min of annealing at 64 mC, and 1 min of extension at 72 mC. A nal 5 min extension at 72 mC was performed before terminating the reaction. Results and discussion Purication of T DNA polymerase The merits of the production of thermostable enzymes in the E. coli system include not only the production of the enzyme in large quantity but also the ease of purication by using different physical properties of the thermostable enzymes compared with those of the host proteins. These advantages were applied to the purication of T DNA polymerase in E. coli. To measure the expression level, E. coli MV1184 har- bouring pTFP11 was cultured in the presence of isopropyl - D-thiogalactoside. The expression level of T DNA poly- merase reached 52 units\ml, roughly a 43-fold increase compared with production by T. liformis. The large scale culture of E. coli MV1184 harbouring pTFP11 was done in a 4 litre fermentor. At rst the harvested cells (39.2 g) were sonicated and treated with streptomycin sulphate to remove nucleic acids. The T DNA polymerase was then puried by heat treatment and DEAE-Sephacel column chromato- graphy. The purication of the enzyme is summarized in Table 1. The specic activity of the puried enzyme was more than 28.8-fold that of the sonicated extract ; recovery Table 1 Purication summary of recombinant T DNA polymerase expressed in E. coli The purification was started with 39.2 g wet weight of cells. Purification Total protein (mg) Total activity (k-units) Specific activity (units/mg) Recovery (%) Sonicated extract 2480.0 219.4 88.5 100 Heat treatment 63.4 72.29 1140.3 33.0 DEAE-Sephacel 19.2 49.02 2552.9 22.3 Figure 2 SDS\PAGE analysis of T DNA polymerase Electrophoresis was performed on a vertical gel containing 7% (w/v) polyacrylamide with a Mighty Small Kit II system (Hoffer Scientific Instruments). Lane 1, uninduced cell ; lane 2, sonicated extract ; lane 3, heat treatmemt ; lane 4, DEAE-Sephacel column chromatography; lane M, low-molecular-mass markers (molecular masses are indicated at the right). Figure 3 Effect of pH on the activity of T DNA polymerase The reaction was performed at 75 mCin the following buffers at a concentration of 50 mM in the presence of 2 mM MgCl 2 : Tris/HCl (#), glycine/NaOH ($). The pH values shown are those at 25 mC. was approx. 22.3% on the basis of the total activity of the sonicated extract. The purication of the enzyme was monitored by SDS\PAGE (Figure 2). Most proteins orig- inating from E. coli were almost removed by heat treatment ; nucleic acids and trace proteins were completely removed by DEAE-Sephacel column chromatography. The puried sample of T DNA polymerase seemed to be homogeneous by SDS\PAGE. A single protein band corresponding to a molecular mass of 92000 Da was obtained by SDS\PAGE. This molecular mass showed good agreement with 93890 Da calculated from the deduced amino acid sequence [10]. # 1999 Portland Press Ltd 22 J. J. Choi and others Figure 4 Effect of temperature on the activity of T DNA polymerase Enzyme activity was assayed at the indicated temperatures in 25 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.5, containing 2 mM MgCl 2 . Figure 5 Thermostability of T DNA polymerase Tfi DNA polymerase was dissolved at a concentration of 10 g/ml protein in 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.5, containing 2 mM MgCl 2 and 0.01% BSA. The enzyme solutions, in the absence of template DNA, were incubated in sealed Eppendorf tubes for 02 h at 75 mC (#) and 94 mC ($). After incubation for the indicated durations, the residual activity was measured as described in the Materials and methods section. Properties of the puried T DNA polymerase Effect of pH on the activity and stability of T DNA polymerase The dependence of T DNA polymerase activity on pH was determined in the pH range 7.610.6. The buffers used were 50 mM Tris\HCl (pH 7.69.4) and 50 mM glycine\NaOH (pH 9.010.6). The results are shown in Figure 3. The enzyme has an optimum catalytic activity at alkaline pH values. From pH 7.6 its activity increases slowly, reaching a maximum at pH 8.49.0 and declining sharply at pH 9.6. These results are similar to the pH dependence of TaqDNA polymerase activity [5]. The pH stability of the enzyme was Figure 6 Effect of KCl on the activity of T DNA polymerase Enzyme activity was assayed separately under the basic reaction conditions with various concentrations of KCl. examined by incubating the enzyme solution at different pH values for 36 h at 25 mC; the residual activity was then measured under the basic reaction conditions. The results indicated that T DNA polymerase is relatively stable at pH 7.810.6 (results not shown). Effect of temperature on the activity and stability of T DNA polymerase The effect of temperature on the T DNA polymerase activity was determined in the range 5585 mC. The optimumtemperature was 7072.5 mC(Figure 4). Figure 5 shows the thermostability of the enzyme at 75 and 94 mC. The enzyme was fairly stable at 75 mC; however, at temperatures above 90 mCthe thermostability of the enzyme decreases drastically. The half-life at 94 mCin the presence of 0.01% BSA was approx. 40 min. Effect of KCl on the activity of TDNA polymerase The results of a study on the inuence of KCl concentration on the T DNA polymerase activity are shown in Figure 6. Its optimal concentration is broad (050 mM), declining sharply at 100 mMor higher. There is no stimulation of enzyme activity in the 150 mM range. In contrast, Taq DNA polymerase is stimulated 2-fold by the addition of KCl [5], and its optimal KCl concentration is 100200 mM. Therefore optimal results are obtained at lower concentrations of KCl with T DNA polymerase than with Taq DNA polymerase. Effects of bivalent cations, EDTA and DTTon the activity of T DNA polymerase Figure 7 shows the effects of different concentrations of Mg 2 + and Mn 2 + on the activity of T DNA polymerase. The optimal Mg 2 + concentration is 4 mM and the optimal Mn 2 + concentration is 1 mM. Comparing the inuences of the two bivalent cations, we found that TDNA # 1999 Portland Press Ltd Properties of Thermus liformis DNA polymerase 23 Figure 7 Effects of bivalent cations, Mg 2 + and Mn 2 + , on the activity of T DNA polymerase Enzyme activity was assayed separately under the basic reaction conditions with various concentrations of Mg 2 + (#) or Mn 2 + ($). Figure 8 Effect of pH on PCR amplication with T DNA polymerase The amplification of -phage DNA fragment was performed in a 50 l reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris/HCl (A) or glycine/NaOH (B) and 1.2 mM MgCl 2 at the pH values indicated. PCR was performed as described in the Materials and methods section. A 5 l sample of each mixture was subjected to electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The positions of size markers are indicated at the left. polymerase exhibited 3-fold higher activity in the presence of Mg 2 + than Mn 2 + . The effects of EDTA (05 mM) and DTT (050 mM) on the activity of the enzyme were examined by assaying enzyme samples in the presence of EDTA and DTT at various concentrations. TDNApolymerase was inhibited by 1.5 mMEDTA; however, DTThad no signicant inuence on activity (results not shown). T DNA polymerase was activated by bivalent cations and was inhibited by EDTA. These results indicate that the highly conserved regions of the polymerase domain of T DNA polymerase also contain a few carboxylates [20], and that bivalent cations are used as cofactor [21]. Figure 9 Effect of Mg 2 + on PCR amplication with T DNA polymerase The amplification of -phage DNA fragment was performed in a 50 l reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 9.0, and concentrations of MgCl 2 as indicated. PCR was performed as described in the Materials and methods section. A sample 5 l of each mixture was subjected to electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The positions of size markers are indicated at the left. Figure 10 Effect of KCl on PCR amplication with T DNA polymerase The amplification of -phage DNA fragment was performed in a 50 l reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 9.0, and 1.5 mM MgCl 2 with concen- trations of KCl as indicated. PCR was performed as described in the Materials and methods section. A 5 l sample of each mixture were subjected to electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The positions of size markers are indicated at the left. Optimal conditions for PCR using T DNA polymerase DNA polymerases from the genus Thermus are thermo- stable, so it is not necessary to replenish the enzyme after each PCR cycle as with E. coli DNA polymerase I. For PCR it is important to know the optimal conditions when using this enzyme. To nd the optimum pH, -phage DNA, with a pH range of 7.69.8, was amplied in the presence of T DNA polymerase by using both primers 1 and 2. The buffers used were 50mM Tris\HCl (pH 7.69.4) and 50 mM glycine\ NaOH (pH 9.09.8). The results are shown in Figure 8. The -phage DNA fragment was well amplied at pH 8.09.4 # 1999 Portland Press Ltd 24 J. J. Choi and others Figure 11 Analysis of PCR products for optimal PCR conditions The amplification of -phage DNA fragment was performed in a 50 l reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 9.0, and 1.5 mM MgCl 2 . PCR was performed as described in the Materials and methods section. A 5 l sample of each mixture was subjected to electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. Lane M, DNA molecular size markers (1 kb DNAladder ; sizes are shown at the left) ; lane 1, the product size expected with primers 1 and 2 was 2 kb; lane 2, the product size expected with primers 1 and 3 was 4 kb; and lane 3, the product size expected with primers 1 and 4 was 6 kb. in 50 mM Tris\HCl and at pH 9.09.4 in 50 mM glycine\ NaOH. However, amplication in glycine\NaOH was lower than for the same pH range in Tris\HCl. For PCR with T DNA polymerase the optimum pH range is 8.89.2. To nd the optimal concentration of Mg 2 + , -phage DNA, with a concentration of Mg 2 + in the range 0.7510 mM, was amplied by using both primers 1 and 2. The results are shown in Figure 9. The optimal Mg 2 + concentration for PCR is 1.5 mM; there was no amplication below 0.75 mM. The results indicate that the optimal Mg 2 + concentration for PCR is slightly different from that of enzyme activity, whose optimal Mg 2 + concentration is 4 mM(see Figure 7). However, -phage DNA fragment was not amplied in the presence of Mn 2 + instead of Mg 2 + . There was no effect of low concentrations of KCl on PCR catalysed by T DNA polymerase; above 80 mM KCl, amplication was inhibited (Figure 10). This is consistent with the effect of KCl on enzyme activity (see Figure 6). This is again in contrast with the behaviours of Taq DNA polymerase ([22], and S.-T. Kwon, unpublished work) and DNA polymerase Tca ([8], and S.-T. Kwon, unpublished work), where the addition of KCl is essential for PCR amplication. With most other DNA polymerases from the genus Thermus, KCl is an indispensable ingredient. Therefore the T DNA polymerase could conceivably have a unique utility in amplifying certain template DNA species that cannot be amplied with KCl-requiring polymerase. As seen from the above results, we found that the optimal buffer for PCR with T DNA polymerase is 50 mM Tris\HCl (pH 9.0)\1.5 mM MgCl 2 , with 0.01% BSA as a stabilizer. -phage DNA fragments were amplied in the presence of T DNA ploymerase, in conjunction with primers 1 and 2, primers 1 and 3 and primers 1 and 4 under the optimal conditions of PCR determined above. T DNA polymerase readily produced 2, 4 and 6 kb DNA fragments (Figure 11). This result indicates that the DNA amplication capability of T DNA polymerase is superior and might be useful in molecular biology, clinical diagnosis, and genetic and evolutionary analyses. As mentioned in the Introduction section, PCR has already become a widespread research technique. Although the results are good in many cases, some points should be considered for exploration if better results are required or if the reaction fails altogether [1]. In addition, in a recent study [23] it was noted that the PCR-inhibiting effect of various components in biological samples could be elimi- nated to some extent by the use of the appropriate thermostable DNA polymerase. T DNA polymerase has some differences in properties compared with the DNA polymerases from other thermophilic bacteria. There is therefore the possibility that T DNA polymerase might be useful for use on a PCR sample that cannot be amplied well with other DNA polymerases; we are conducting experi- ments to establish the PCR conditions for various samples. Acknowledgment This study was supported by the Academic Research Fund (GE97-233) of the Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea. References 1 Erlich, H. A. (1989) PCR Technology: Principles and Appli- cations for DNA Amplification, Stockton Press, New York 2 Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A. and Arnheim, N. (1985) Science 230, 13501354 3 Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B. and Erlich, H. A. (1988) Science 239, 487491 4 Chien, A., Edgar, D. B. and Trela, J. M. (1976) J. Bacteriol. 127, 15501557 5 Kaledin, A. S., Slyusarenko, A. G. and Gorodetskii, S. I. (1980) Biokhimiya 45, 644651 6 Kaledin, A. S., Slyusarenko, A. G. and Gorodetskii, S. I. (1981) Biokhimiya 46, 15761584 7 Ruettimann, C., Cotoras, M., Zaldivar, J. and Vicuna, R. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 149, 4146 8 Park, J. H., Kim, J. S., Kwon, S.-T. and Lee, D.-S. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 214, 135140 9 Hudson, J. A., Morgan, H. W. and Daniel, R. M. (1987) Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37, 431436 10 Jung, S. E., Choi, J. J., Kim, H. K. and Kwon, S.-T. (1997) Mol. Cells 7, 769776 # 1999 Portland Press Ltd Properties of Thermus liformis DNA polymerase 25 11 Ramaley, R. F. and Hixson, J. (1970) J. Bacteriol. 103, 526528 12 Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 13 Marmur, J. (1961) J. Mol. Biol. 3, 208218 14 Kwon, S.-T., Kim, J. S., Park, J. H., Kim, H. K. and Lee, D.-S. (1997) Mol. Cells 7, 264271 15 Hanahan, D. (1983) J. Mol. Biol. 166, 557580 16 Shine, J. and Dalgarno, L. (1975) Nature (London) 254, 3438 17 Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265275 18 Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Nature (London) 227, 680685 19 Sanger, F., Coulson, A. R., Hong, G. F., Hill, D. F. and Petersen, G. B. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 162, 729773 20 Blanco, L., Bernad, A., Blasco, M. A. and Salas, M. (1991) Gene 100, 2738 21 Joyce, C. M. and Steitz, T. A. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 63216329 22 Kwon, S.-T., Kim, J. S., Park, J. H., Koh, S. and Lee, D.-S. (1991) Mol. Cells 1, 369375 23 Abu Al-Soud, W. and Ra/ dstro$ m, P. (1998) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 37483753 Received 25 January 1999\23 March 1999; accepted 13 April 1999 # 1999 Portland Press Ltd