Speed Seduction 3 Disc Five

Speed Seduction 3.
0

Program Transcript:
Disc Five

Created By
Ross Jeffries
Getting Some

Website:
http://www.speedseduction.biz

The Guru of

For the smart guy who refuses

to resort to bullying, begging,

Copyright 2008, Ross Jeffries. All Rights Reserved.
This transcript may not be duplicated without written permission
buying, bs or booze, in his pursuit of happiness.

from the author.
Disclaimer

This program may contain viewpoints that may be considered controversial by certain
audiences. It is intended as a powerful guide for self-respecting, intelligent men who
are looking to avoid from "real-hate-shun-ships by default" and instead claim the
happiness that they deserve.

I, Ross Jeffries, Ghita Services., Inc, and/or SpeedSeduction.biz (or any of our other
websites or entities) cannot and will not be held responsible in any way for your actions,
and will not be held liable for any and all claims from you or any other third party.

You alone are responsible for your decisions and actions, even if they have an impact
on others. This information is meant for "entertainment" purposes only.

While this transcript contains information, tips, tools, and strategies that are
recommended by us and, in most cases, have succeeded when applied by others, this
product and its contents carry no warranty or guarantee (either explicit or implied) that
the purchaser or reader will achieve success with women, or in any other endeavor for
which they may be used.

Ross: From time to time, we all experience some clarity. The point Im trying to
make to you is at any moment these four forces are constantly shaping
and reshaping who we are.

The story I told you about that guy whose old self came back is bullshit.
There never was a self to begin with. There were just these different
forces pulling at him in different proportions, in different sequence and in
different degrees of intensity producing his ongoing sense of a self. There
really was no self there. It was just the ongoing flow of these forces
constantly tugging and changing how we define and experience life.

Does that make sense? Heres what I want you to get. Every human being
goes through it. Every human, old or young, from the moment were born
to the moment we draw our last breath, these four forces are constantly
shaping and reshaping who we are.

Ill tell you something else. The same source thats constantly tugging at
all of reality reshaping it, in my belief, is that not only is there no self, but
there is no steady, constant reality. My belief is that we are constantly
taken out and put back in, in increments of speed that are too fast for us to
observe and increments of time that are too short for us to perceive. The
perception is that its steady and constant.

The perception is we have a self. We wake up. We go through our day
with this constant, steady self that has a series of experiences. I believe
that its an illusion. If you can get this sort of idea that we are all constantly
in the same condition, we all came in the same way and will go out the
same way and every moment we are constantly being taken out and put
back into reality by these four forces, you begin to get compassion for
people.

Speed Seduction 3.0 | Program Transcript Disc Five
Website http://www.speedseduction.biz
1
Heres what I dont mean. Look up here. By compassion I dont mean a
Hallmark greeting card. I dont mean some syrupy, corny, beautiful, white
light of Jesus is gushing from your heart enveloping everyone in love,
love, love, New Age, tofu-sucking, steak-avoiding, dont eat meat love. I
dont mean that.

To me, compassion is a simple perception. Its a very simple, non-
emotional subtle perception that somewhere in the back of your mind you
hold that we are all sharing the same fundamental condition.

When I walk into any kind of group setting or venue, before I walk in, I take
a breath and imagine every person in that room, male, female, attractive
or unattractive. Their hearts are all beating. I imagine a pair of hands thats
constantly tugging and pulling them in four different ways. I say to myself,
Not only are they in the same condition as I am, but the same hands are
constantly shaping the clay of their reality and my reality. When you look
at people that way, separateness is an illusion.

Heres the thing you have to get. When it comes to being effective with
people, you have to sort of wear bifocals. You have to be able to look at
people from that perspective, from the compassionate perspective that
says, Yes. Were all in the same condition. Then you also have to be
able to look at yourself as being separate.

The name of the game is not looking at everything as being in union or
everything being separate. The name of the game is freedom and choice.

If somewhere humming in the background of your mind when youre going
to attract or seduce, you can hold the thought that were all in the same
condition, then how can you be afraid of someone whos being created by
the same thing as you are every moment? How can you feel separate or
2
afraid of someone whos being produced by the same fundamental forces,
whos being upheld at every moment by the same thing thats upholding
you? How can you be afraid or feel separate from someone when you see
them as fundamentally being produced by the same thing as you are?

I challenge you to feel afraid if thats how you view people. It becomes
impossible. You cant because you get that fundamentally, we really are
not separate from each other.

I believe there are two ways to look at human beings. Each can be valid
from its own framework. By the way, who knows something at all about
physics? I dont mean quantum psychology physics that you read in the
back of your weekly throw away newspaper. I mean the real thing. Who
here knows anything about Newtons Laws of Motion?

You can use Newtons Laws of Motion to predict the path of an artillery
shell, correct?

Participant: Yes.

Ross: Even though Einstein came along, do Newtons Laws of Motion work at
speeds approaching the speed of light?

Participant: No.

Ross: No. They dont. Do they work at subatomic levels to predict quantum
events? Can you predict or describe quantum events using Newtons
Laws of Motion?

Participant: No.

3
Ross: I cant hear you.

Participants: No.

Ross: Does that mean that their completely invalid?

Participants: No.

Ross: From a certain frame of reference they work. Even though Einstein came
along, you can still use Newtons Laws to accurately predict the path of a
bullet, true or false?

Participant: True.

Ross: Depending upon your frame of reference, theyre true or not true. Theyre
usable and not usable.

I believe there are two ways to look at human beings. You can look at
humans as basically bags of chemicals. Were basically chemical,
biological machines moving through a cause-and-effect world. Time flows
in a linear fashion of past, present and future. Yes?

Participant: Yes.

Ross: Were all separate from each other. That can be a useful perspective.
When you go to do your taxes, you have to view yourself as a separate
thing. You had better view yourself that way. Yes?

God forbid if any of you ever gets into a car accident, cracks up on the M5
motorway, you dont want them to rush to a Chinese herbalist or an
acupuncturist. I want to be taken to the best Western trauma clinic to have
4
them pump me full of blood, reset my bones and do whatever they need to
do.

However, theres another view of humans that says fundamentally, you
can view humans as patterns of information. In fact, the future can
influence the past. Time can flow in a lot of different directions. Were
always connected with each other anyway. Information can travel,
information located without ever actually having to travel. Do you
understand?

You can look at humans in either of those two ways. The language
patterns that Im giving you are sort of like the cause and effect level. This
energetic stuff Im giving you is looking at people from a totally different
perspective.

Which on is right? Which one works? They both do according to how you
view people. Does that make sense?

But, heres the thing. This stuff Im giving you trumps all the language
patterns. If you can get the vibe down right, learn to walk through
uncertainty without fearing that uncertainty, learn to have equanimity for
the things that trouble other people and stop them, learn to have a good
learning strategy so all that rumination shuts down, by the way, how many
guys here think that beautiful girl ruminates about something in her head?
Raise your hand. I can guarantee you that the super hot woman is
ruminating about something. It could be about some guy she was involved
with five years ago.

When you walk through the world quiet where other people are noisy,
unafraid to step into the unknown and give other people radical permission
to have their first response to you that is so unusually sexy that women
5
cant even put their finger on the source of their excitement as to why
theyre excited. Do you understand?

No one can ever AIM log you out of that. They cant. No one can ever
blow you out of the set because your whole world is your set. Do you
understand? Its undetectable.

Ill tell you something else. Its actually more acceptable to women
because when youre super cocky, smooth and slick, women dont trust it.
That kind of alpha, sure it may be sexy, but on the other hand its a little
scary. What? Is this guy a professional seducer? Well, yes, kind of. Do
you understand? Its frightening.

The kind of stealth charisma Im teaching you is not frightening. It has
nothing to do with being slick. Does that make sense? Yes, James, my
champion seducer James

James: Thats what Im actually learning at the moment is to just go with the
attitude lets go and see. Ive had the most amazing responses Ive ever
had from just having that attitude.

Ross: I want you guys to join the lets see what happens club instead of the
what the fuck just happened club.

James: Its the differentiation between approval seeking and Im actually
comfortable with myself.

Ross: Beautiful. James just said its the distinction between seeking approval or
validation and just being comfortable with the process.

6
Heres the thing I want you guys to get. People entangle. Lets say this is
your raw lust for a woman. Very few guys experience pure, 100% raw
desire for a woman. They entangle it with a need for validation.

How many people feel they need to be validated by beautiful women?
Raise your hand you fucking liars. Anyone whos not raising their hand is
either a liar, delusional or they should teach this class.

Participant: Theyre gay.

Ross: Or theyre gay. Or theyre a combination of all of these options.

Most guys entangle their raw lust with the need for validation and anxiety.
A lot of guys are carrying a lot of resentment. Am I right or wrong?

Participant: Right.

Ross: Im willing to bet part of your problem is that youve never experienced
pure desire for women. Part of your problem is youve never approached a
woman out of pure, raw, unadulterated lust.

Actually, if you really want to know a secret, nothing is more exciting than
pure, raw, unadulterated male lust and desire when its not entangled with
all of this stuff. When its not entangled with the need for validation,
resentment or ego driven, its actually really sexy.

Track 2:

Ross: I want to get into it. This is really a fun little module that I do. Its effortless
and fun. Its easy for you guys since its toward the end of the day. Its
7
5:30 p.m. now. I would like to go to 7:00 or even 7:30 p.m. Is that going to
fuck up anybodys plans?

Participants: No.

Ross: I have a lot to teach. Ive been re-energized by a nice, vigorous Chinese
massage. I thought wed change the pace a bit, make it easier for the next
half-hour to forty-five minutes and talk about autopilot responses.

Remember I talked about the third level of the mind where she responds
with the illusion of choice when its really just her fixed ways of perceiving.
Many times when we deal with women from the initial approach all the
way to going to bed with them, we get autopilot responses.

I have a belief. All of my verbal responses and behaviors flow out of my
beliefs. If you understand my beliefs and take them on for yourself, then
the verbal responses become easy. You can come up with your own.

I have two core beliefs for dealing with women. I am going to tell you the
beliefs. Well discuss them and get the meaning. Then Ill let you take it
word-for-word but first look up here.

My core beliefs for dealing with women are first, before I even open my
mouth, women will have already given me everything I need, show me
everything I need and tell me everything I need to seduce them.

My second belief that enables me to deal with autopilot is I seldom take a
womans first response to me as written in stone. Its almost always a
reflection of what shes thinking, feeling and believing in that moment and
context. Its almost always subject to change. This is a strong belief I hold.

8
The beliefs that flow out of that are anything she offers me is just a toy for
me to play with. Anything she offers me is just information I can use.
Anything she offers me is just energy that I can redirect.

Another belief I have is they can do whatever they want. I control where
my energy flows.

Some of the typical things youll hear are, I have a boyfriend. Have you
ever heard that?

Participants: Yes.

Ross: I have a full range of responses for that. Are you ready?

I have a boyfriend. Here is the first response. You dont need to
convince me someone else finds you attractive. Thats not how I make up
my mind. Write that one down.

Whats the presupposition of that belief? The presupposition of that belief
is telling me she has a boyfriend is not a way of shutting me down. Shes
telling me she has a boyfriend because she wants me to like her more. Im
deliberately misinterpreting the meaning of her objection and switching the
frame around to say, Quit trying to convince me that I should like you. Do
you understand? Were switching the frame on her.

Her comment, I have a boyfriend, is designed to put me off to say, Im
not interested. Im deliberately misinterpreting it and saying, Wait a
minute. Stop trying to convince me that I should like because another guy
likes you. Its really good.

9
Heres another response. Check out this one. Watch this, guys. I have a
boyfriend. Anyone even halfway good looking can be with someone. By
that math, you should be with five people, no, four and a half. What am I
implying there when I say someone?

Participant: Her boyfriend.

Participant: Theres nothing special about it.

Ross: Yes. Someone. She cant tell if Im insulting her or what. By that math,
you should be with five people. Do you hear the compliment? Nah, make
it four and a half.

Halfway good looking can be with someone. I didnt say good looking.

Participant: Have you ever tried, or maybe six.?

Ross: No. By that math, you should be with five people. Thats saying shes
really good looking. Nah, make it four and a half. Then they always
punch me in the arm and say, You punk, or Youre cheeky. Do you get
it? Im just blowing it off with humor and saying it really doesnt matter.

Heres another one. Are you ready?

Participant: Whoa.

Ross: Do you want me to repeat it again? Do you still not get it? Anyone even
halfway good looking could be with someone.

Participant: I have that.

10
Ross: By that math you should be with five people. Nah, make it four and a
half. Its a clever way of saying, Come on. What am I really saying?
Come on. You can do a lot better than him. Im not saying it. Im implying
it. Yes?

Heres another one. Are you ready?

I have a boyfriend. Boyfriends are like colds. You can catch one at any
time. It doesnt mean you cant shake it off. Do you like that?

Participants: Yes.

Ross: Will you give me three minutes. I really have to pee. Take three minutes
and talk amongst yourselves, would you? Youre twitching it into a
metaphor to change how she thinks about it.

So are you telling me the bridge is out or is it just a little bump in the
road? Youd be surprised how often you hear, Its just a bump in the
road.

I have a boyfriend. I only know you two minutes and youre already
telling me your problems.

What James?

James: Couldnt you actually use the boyfriend?

Ross: Yes. When a woman says she has a boyfriend, often its just a bullshit
autopilot response. A lot of women are what I call monkey branchers. Do
you know what a monkey brancher is?

11
Did you ever watch a monkey swing from branch to branch in the zoo? It
doesnt fully let go of one branch until it has its arm on the other one. It
doesnt really jump from branch to branch. Some monkeys do but most
monkeys have to grab hold of the next branch before theyll fully let go of
the other one.

Most women are monkey branchers. The boyfriend is just filling time. It
doesnt mean anything.

Five years back, I had this fling with this 22-year-old waitress from
California Pizza Kitchen. Shed come over to my house. Wed fuck. Then
shed say things like, Can you drive me back to my place. My boyfriend is
taking me to the movies in half an hour.

She wouldnt bee seen with me in public. She wouldnt go to the movies or
dinner with me but shed come over and fuck. Does that make sense?

Participants: Yes.

Ross: It really doesnt conventionally make sense but in reality it makes sense.

The other problem with boyfriends is a lot of boyfriends are stuck-up
bitches. Theyre not willing to experiment with wild, crazy, sexual shit. Or
the boyfriend may be fulfilling her very nicely when it comes to that social
level of the mind but hes not really pushing the other buttons. So what?

I used to have a student named Doc Davy. He sort of looked like you but
had 60 more pounds glued to his belly. His specialty was fucking chicks
he picked up in the gym but they would never be seen with him in public.
They wouldnt go out with him or introduce him to their friends. They would
just fuck him. Poor bastard.
12

The other thing is sometimes Ive had situations where Ive met women
and theyve said, No. Im really with someone right now. Ill look them in
the eye and say this, If you should discover hes not with you in the way
you truly want him to be, maybe we owe it to ourselves to talk. Listen to
that.

This is an example where I want you to write it down word-for-word, all
right? If they say, No seriously, Im really seeing someone, or I just
started to date someone. I want to see if it works out, you say the
following, If you should discover that hes not with you in the way you truly
want him to be, maybe we owe it to ourselves to talk.

Did we get that down word-for-word? This is an instance where I want you
to take notes. You need to get this word-for-word. Did you get it? Who
needs the wording? Make sure you put in that word truly. Its crucial.

Then give her your number.

Now, lets parse this out. If you should discover, I dont say how or when
she should discover it or in what manner the discovery should come
through in her mind. This is an example of being what?

Participants: Vague.

Ross: Vague. I didnt say, If, as youre lying there one day after making love to
him, it pops into your mind that hes a lousy lover and you think about the
kind of fucking youd really like, I didnt say that.

Participants: No.

13
Ross: Why?

Participant: Too specific.

Ross: Too specific. If you should discover, discover is very vague. It leaves it
broadly wide open. Did I say, Hes a bastard, or Hes a rotten guy,
Hes a poor lover, He doesnt listen to you, or Hes bad among your
friends.? Did I say any of those things?

Look up here. Its crucial that you get this. Knowing when to be specific,
when to be vague and how to fractionate back and forth, is extraordinarily
powerful in persuading people.

Participant: What if you want to say hes a bastard? Why cant you?

Ross: Because it may not match her experience. What if she doesnt think hes a
bastard? What if the reason she finds hes not with her in the way she truly
wants him to be is he doesnt make enough money or hes a poor lover? I
want her to fill in the gap. Do you understand?

If you should discover hes not with you in the way you truly want him to
be, now, in order to think about that question, what part of her mind does
she have to go into? What does she have to think about?

Participant: Her feelings.

Participant: Her ideals.

Ross: She has to think about the way she truly wants a man to be. Theres a big
distinction here. If I said, If you discover hes not with you in the way you
want him to be, eh. By saying, truly want him to be, the implication of
14
that adjective is that theres another level of satisfaction that she hasnt
been thinking about. Isnt there?

We already have a supplier for our copy machine. Well, if you should
discover theyre not meeting you needs in the way you truly want them to,
maybe we owe it to each other to talk. Do you understand?

If hes not with you in the way you truly want him to be, where does she
have to go in her mind to even contemplate that? She has to go into the
part of her mind where she thinks about the things that would most deeply,
really fulfill her. Yes?

Maybe, so its a softener, we owe it to ourselves to talk. What does that
mean, owe it to ourselves to talk.? First of all, saying ourselves implies
that we have a relationship, doesnt it? I didnt say, Maybe you owe it to
yourself to call me. Why? That would come off as arrogant. Right?

I say, Maybe we owe it to ourselves to talk. In what way do we owe it to
ourselves? According to whom do we owe it to ourselves? How should it
occur to her that we owe it to ourselves? What do you mean ourselves
and talk which way? Talk about what? Talk how? Talk where?

Its so fucking vague. Its like taking a jellyfish, coating it with grease, and
sliding it down a tube slicked with sex lube. Theres no resistance to push
back against. She cant push against any of this because Im not saying
anything specific.

Yet, at the same time, another reason its powerful is not just because its
vague. Its powerful because it demonstrates understanding in a womans
world. It demonstrates the fact that women are always re-evaluating their
relationships. Even if their happy with a guy, some part of them is always
15
thinking, Is he really the one? Do I really want to be with him? Theyre
constantly discussing you with their girlfriends.

Im actually pacing her reality. Im demonstrating that I understand her
deeper processes because women do that. Theyll be with a guy and
think, Is he really the one I want to be with? Women love playing this
game with themselves. Its part of how they fractionate their interest in a
guy. They love him. They love him. Then they pop out of it and say, Do I
really love him? Then they pop back into it. Do you understand? What
usually happens is they say, I really dont.

What am I really doing? This is setting off a time bomb in her mind. It
really is. Shes going to go home and look at him with a much more critical
eye. Now shes not looking through the eye of hes my boyfriend. Shes
looking at him through the eye saying, Is he who I really want to be with?
Then shes going to start doubting everything he does. Pretty soon, shes
going to say, I need to give that guy a call. Is that fair?

Participants: Yes.

Ross: This is a ticking, little timed-release capsule. Now, guess what? If hes a
great guy and doesnt fuck it up, she may say, He really is someone I
want to be with. Chances are hes an AFC, average frustrated chump, in
some way. He just got lucky and asked her out when she was lonely and
punched the right button a couple of times.

Now, what would most guys do? Yes, you have a boyfriend but tell me
five reasons why you love him, So what? Im better, or Never mind.
Thank you.

Yes, you had a comment James?
16

James: I was just going to say theres the likelihood that the relationships going to
split up at some point. Youre giving her a safety net.

Ross: Youre enjoying this, arent you? You like this one.

The first time I used this, she called me two weeks later and said, I realize
he really wasnt with me the way I truly wanted him to be. Can I see you?
I said, Sure.

Participant: Would you give them your number?

Ross: Yes.

Participant: I said that. I got that off your home study work course. I was in a night
club. There was one I said because I read something from your old book
about the sea, the sky and the feel of the sand.

Shes says, Okay, hypnotize me then. I said, All right. Sit on the stool. I
took her a little bit away from where the music was pumping. Then I used
a little ice cube on her head. She thought, That was really nice, but the
first thing she said was if I was magical at hypnosis, Id be able to bring
her a boyfriend.

After the ice cube, I said, If youre not with somebody whos with you in a
way you truly want them to be, then maybe we should talk. Then she
looked at me like that and the head went _________. I didnt have more
firepower or material.

Ross: You didnt need any more firepower. I dropped the H bomb on her. She
vaporized and I need more firepower. The only firepower you need is to
17
say something like, You know what? Why dont we go somewhere a little
more quiet where we can really relax and focus in.

Participant: Thats like one of those closing statements.

Participant: How do you deal with buyers remorse?

Ross: Youre not going to get buyers remorse, if every step of the way, shes
reaching for more.

Participant: It can be a lot longer.

Ross: You wont get buyers remorse if youre fractionating, challenging her,
feeding back her own language and making her reach for it at every
moment.

Sometimes Ill say to a woman, On a scale of one to 10, how does this
feel? Shell say, Ten. Ill say, If and only if you want better feeling, say,
more please. Ill make her say more please. Flat out, say, More please.

If a woman is reaching for something and shes actually verbally saying
more, how can she resist it? Shes convincing herself every step of the
way. Shes investing in it, remember?

You wont get buyers remorse. You may get token resistance but thats
not the same.

Does that make sense?

Participant: Yes.

18
Ross: You see its the same principles operating. Youre demonstrating authority
in her world, being vague, and getting her to think from a certain level of
the mind. Theyre the same principles no matter what part of the sarge
youre in.

Participant: Is there any other way of demonstrating authority in her world?

Ross: There are different ways you can demonstrate authority. You can
demonstrate that you understand her ongoing processes by observing
what shes doing inside energetically. When our friend was up in front of
the room and I noticed what he was thinking as he was thinking it, that
established real expertise of authority in his world. Didnt it? I was able to
observe.

You can demonstrate that you understand how women think overall. That
statement, if hes not with you in the way you truly want him to be, is not
only vague and requires her to go into the deepest level of her mind to
answer it, but it also demonstrates, without saying it, that you understand
how women think, that women are constantly questioning their
relationships.

The best techniques employ two or three things simultaneously. This one
is really a good example because youre being vague. She fills in the
blanks and cant resist. Youre demonstrating authority in her world
because women do in fact question their relationships

Youre requiring a response from the deepest level of her mind. How many
words are in that? Maybe 20 words. Its pretty powerful. It shows you what
you can do when you know where to direct this communication instead of
willy-nilly tossing things about.

19
Participant: Ill scan for the eye contact. If I get a bit of eye contact, Ill drop a smile. If
she goes _________, Ill hold her there and then. On this scale, you can
see 60 % to 80% of her wanted to side with me. Another part of her is
saying, Hang on.

Ross: The sensible part of her.

Participant: You could say that 80% of her wanted to side with me. I was saying,
Look. Im a stranger. Ive stopped you inside the shopping center. I can
see she was smiling and energetic. She just didnt have any words. I was
saying, If you were in a nightclub and I come over and said, Hello.

Ross: Can you point your feet like this? Point your feet straight. Look up.

I want you to do something for me. I want you to hold your attention on
your feet. Relax your body and smile. You dont have to go into trance.
You can look normally into people. Look around the room but put a little bit
of your attention on your feet. Relax your shoulders. You can change. You
dont have to stand there. Keep 10% of you attention on your feet and talk
to me. Keep talking.

Participant: Like I said, you could say that 80% of her was thinking, Yes. I like this
fellow. Hes interested. I said to her, If I was in a nightclub and I came
and approached you, it would be considered normal. Youre used to
strangers approaching you in a nightclub. Just because I stopped you in a
shopping center, people are shopping and walking by, you dont know me.
Youre thinking its a bit too weird to just come over in Starbucks and just
sit down.

The reason why I popped the question is if it was you, what would you say
differently to her? You probably have better words than I do.
20
21

Ross: Its not my words. Talk to me again but put 20% of your attention in your
feet. Tell me the story again.

Participant: She was walking through the shopping center. I was walking, looked and
saw her eyes. I smiled a little and so did she. I cut across and halted her.
She stopped. I said to her, I like you. I want to get to know you. She
smiled a bit and said, This is a bit random.

What I did was step out of the way. If she wants to keep walking

Ross: Stop right there. Dont say a word. Turn around and look at the camera.
Did any of you see the difference in how he presented?

Participant: Yes.

Ross: What did you notice different when he put 20% of his focus on his feet?

Participant: Slower.

Ross: What else? Less absolutely terrifying because hes not looking like hes a
bumblebee on cocaine? Do you need to change tape? You can leave it for
the day.

Your issue, sir, is not what youre saying. Your issue is youre like that
junkyard dog with a huge boner ready to hump the world. Youre coming
at people with so much voltage.

Speed Seduction 3 Disc Five

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Speed Seduction 3 Disc Five

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Speed Seduction 3.

S-ar putea să vă placă și