Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
.
The overall complexity of the fixed subcarrier
paring scheme is (). Recall that the
complexity of the proposed graph-based scheme
is (
2
+
3
), which is higher than the
benchmark scheme
We adopt the path loss model in [13], where the
path loss exponent is set to 4 and the standard
deviation of
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
kms
k
m
s
Two dimensional plane of nodes location
sources
boundary
relays
Fig. 3. Two-dimensional plane of nodes location.
Fig. 4. Performance comparison of the proposed
algorithm and the benchmark.
International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) volume 6 number 2 Dec 2013
ISSN: 2231-2803 http://www.ijcttjournal.org Page110
log-normal shadowing is set to 5.8 dB. The small-
scale fading is modeled by multi-path Rayleigh
fading process, where the power delay profile is
exponentially decaying with maximum delay
spread of 5 s and maximum Doppler spread of 5
Hz. A total of 2000 independent channel
realizations were generated, each associated with
a different node locations. The number of
subcarriers is N = 32. All sources have the same
maximum power constraints, so do all relays and
they satisfy = + 3dB = + 3dB (per-
subcarrier) for all r and k As a performance
benchmark, the fixed subcarrier pairing scheme is
considered. Like the previous work (e.g., [1], [2]),
we let signals transmitted by the user pair on one
subcarrier in the MAC phase is forwarded on the
same subcarrier by a relay in the BC phase, i.e.,
(n) = n, rather than seeking the optimal
subcarrier pairing. Namely, each subcarrier n shall
be assigned to the user pair and the relay that
satisfy ( , =arg max kK rM The
overall complexity of the fixed subcarrier paring
scheme is O(KMN). Recall that the complexity of
the proposed graph-based scheme is O(KM +
), which is higher than the benchmark scheme.
Fig. 4 illustrates the total throughput when there
are K = 5 user pairs and M = 4 relays in the
network. We observe that the proposed optimal
channel and relay assignment with adaptive
subcarrier pairing achieves improvement in
Fig. 5. Effects of the number of relays, where N =
32, K = 5, and = 10 dB. total throughput over
the scheme with fixed subcarrier pairing. Fig. 5
shows the throughput performance versus the
number of relays when K = 5 and = 10 dB. It
is observed that having multiple relays in the
system can provide relay selection diversity.
However, the gain brought by increasing the
number of relays is diminishing when M is large
enough. This is due to the fact that the capacity
scaling of relay selection is log logM
CONCLUSIONS
In this work, the channel estimation is perfect as
the channel between different links experience
independent fading.OFDM is very easy and
efficient in dealing with multi-path and Robust
again narrow-band interference.As OFDM-based
network supports multi relay-multi pairs of source
node to conduct bidirectional communications, it
maximizes the throughput optimally. The problem
was formulated as a combinatorial optimization
problem and NP-complete. We proposed a
bipartite matching approach to solve the problem
optimally in polynomial time. The work assumed
International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) volume 6 number 2 Dec 2013
ISSN: 2231-2803 http://www.ijcttjournal.org Page111
the amplify-and-forward based nonregenerative
relay strategy. The similar problem based on
more advanced regenerative two-way relay
strategies can be considered in the future
work. The results were shown for the use of
different number of subcarriers.
REFERENCES
[1] G. Li and H. Liu, Resource allocation for
OFDMA relay networks with fairness
constraints, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol.
24, no. 11, pp. 20612069, Nov. 2006.
[2] T. C.-Y. Ng and W. Yu, Joint optimization of
relay strategies and resource allocations in
cooperative cellular networks, IEEE J. Sel. Areas
Commun., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 328339, Feb. 2007.
[3] I. Hammerstrom and A. Wittneben, Power
allocation schemes for amplify-and-forward
MIMO-OFDM relay links, IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 27982802, Aug.
2007.
[4] Y. Li, W. Wang, J. Kong, and M. Peng,
Subcarrier pairing for amplify-and-forward and
decode-and-forward OFDM relay links, IEEE
Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 209211, Apr.
2009.
[5] W. Dang, M. Tao, H. Mu, and J. Huang,
Subcarrier-pair based resource allocation for
cooperative multi-relay OFDM systems, IEEE
Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1640
1649, May 2010.
[6] C. K. Ho, R. Zhang, and Y. C. Liang, Two-
way relaying over OFDM:Optimized tone
permutation and power allocation, in Proc. IEEE
ICC, May 2008, pp. 39083912.
[7] Y. Liu, M. Tao, B. Li, and H. Shen,
Optimization framework and graph-based
approach for relay-assisted bidirectional OFDMA
cellular networks, IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 3490 3500, Nov.
2010. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON
COMMUNICATIONS, ACCEPTED FOR
PUBLICATION 5
[8] B. Rankov and A. Wittneben, Spectral
efficient protocols for halfduplexfading relay
channels, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 25,
no. 2, pp. 379389, Feb. 2007.
[9] X. Zhang, A. Ghrayeb, and M. Hasna,
Network coding and relay assignment schemes
for systems with multiple two-way relay..
[10] X. J. Zhang and Y. Gong, Adaptive power
allocation in two-way amplify-and-forward relay
networks, in Proc. 2009 IEEE ICC.
[11] Y.-U. Jang, E.-R. Jeong, and Y. H. Lee, A
two-step approach to power allocation for OFDM
signals over two-way amplify-and-forward
relay,IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 58, no. 4,
pp. 24262430, Apr. 2010.
International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) volume 6 number 2 Dec 2013
ISSN: 2231-2803 http://www.ijcttjournal.org Page112
[12] D. West, Introduction to Graph Theory.
Prentice Hall, 2001.
BIO DATA
N.SREENIVASULU REDDY presently
pursuing M.Tech in Department of electronics
and communications in PBR VITS, Kavali,
A.P, India AP, India
K.NIRANJAN KUMAR presently working
as an Assistant Professor in Department of
electronics and communications in VITS Kavali,
A.P, India AP, India .