0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
93 vizualizări10 pagini
A natural class is a group of language sounds that share a phonetic feature. Palatalization applies before all and only the vowels / i, #, u / Lango "SPIRANTIZATION" applies only to / t, d /.
A natural class is a group of language sounds that share a phonetic feature. Palatalization applies before all and only the vowels / i, #, u / Lango "SPIRANTIZATION" applies only to / t, d /.
A natural class is a group of language sounds that share a phonetic feature. Palatalization applies before all and only the vowels / i, #, u / Lango "SPIRANTIZATION" applies only to / t, d /.
Language sounds fall into natural classes according to their articulatory and/or acoustic properties. We name these properties using features like [labial], [voiced], [high], [strident]. We can define a natural class as follows:
natural class: A group of language sounds that share a phonetic feature or (usually small) set of features that no other sounds in the language share.
Examples that we have seen:
ENGLISH VELAR FRONTING [+velar]: - fronting applies not just to /k/, but to all velars, i.e. /k, g, !/ - fronting does NOT affect other consonants, e.g. /t, d/ [+front]: - velar fronting takes place before all front vowels, not just /i/ - velar fronting does NOT take place before non-front vowels
PAPAGO PALATALIZATION
! " # $ % & + + alveolar stop , ! " # $ % & + + al alveopalat stop : palatalization turns /t, d/ into affricates [t ! !, d ! "] palatalization does NOT apply to [-stop] or [-alveolar] [t ! !#posid] to brand, [d ! "usukal] type of lizard, not *[t ! !#po!id], *[d ! "u!ukal] [d!"uki] rain, [t ! !uagia] net bag, not *[ d!"ut ! !i], *[t ! !uad ! "ia],
[+high]: palatalization applies before all and only the vowels /i, #, u/
LANGO SPIRANTIZATION
! ! " # $ $ % &+ long - voice - stop , ! ! " # $ $ % &' long - voice - stop : all simple voiceless stops become non-stops in / V___V Compare: [!xb] I said, [gdo!] to build, [!! " d! "] I beat, [bwg] young
What do these forms tell us about our natural class?
Where natural classes operate
INPUT SEGMENTS: English velars, Papago alveolar stops, Lango voiceless stops TRIGGER SEGMENTS: English front vowels, Papago high vowels OUTPUT SEGMENTS: English fronted velars, Papago alveopalatal affricates, Lango fricatives
English /k! / ! [k] / ___ #, $, %, l? Papago changes alveopalatal affricates to alveolar stops before non-high vowels? Lango changes fricatives into stops when geminate or at word boundaries?
Answer: In general, we expect phonological rules to have natural motivations. But how do we know what is natural?
WHAT MAKES PHONOLOGICAL RULES NATURAL?
Part of understanding phonology is understanding why certain processes are natural and others are not. It cannot be an accident that certain processes (= rules) operate in virtually the same way in thousands of languages and other processes are rarely, if ever found in languages. There is not one simple explanation for why this is soall the articulatory and perceptual aspects of language come into play. Nonetheless, we can list some of the most common natural processes and provide a rudimentary explanation for their frequency and, by implication, the rareness of the opposite processes. Below are some widespread natural phonological processes. The opposite processes would (probably always) be unnatural, for example, it would not be natural for voiced sounds to become voiceless between vowels or for fricatives to become stops between vowels.
CONSONANTS
NATURAL PROCESS TOWARD EXPLAINING WHAT IS NATURAL (1) INTERVOCALIC VOICING {f, s, x} ! [v, z, $] / V__V
(somewhat less common) {p, t, k} ! [b, d, g] / V__V Voiceless fricatives become voiced between vowels. Somewhat less common, voiceless stops become voiced between vowels. Presumably the obstruents take on the voicing quality of the surrounding vowels. (2) INTERVOCALIC SPIRANTIZATION {b, d, g} ! [%, &, $]
(somewhat less common) {p, t, k} ! [f/', (/s, x] Voiced stops become fricatives between vowels. Somewhat less common, voiceless stops become voiceless fricatives. This has sometimes been characterized as assimilation to the [+continuant] feature of vowels, but more likely is failure to quite make the oral closure for the stop in transitioning from one vowel to the next. (In practical terms, maybe this is what assimilation to the [+continuant] feature means!) (3) INTERVOCALIC SONORIZATION {b, d, g} ! [w, ), w] / V__V
(somewhat less common) {p, t, k} ! [w, ), w ~ h] / V__V Related to INTERVOCALIC SPIRANTIZATION is INTERVOCALIC SONORIZATION. Sometimes they will be mixed, for example, in Kuria, /b/ ! [%] whereas /d/ ! [)]. The explanation for sonorization is probably the same as for spirantization, that is, failure to quite make oral closure between the vowel, but in sonorization the oral constriction is even weaker than for spirantization. Linguistics 120A 3. Natural Classes, Natural Rules, Rule Ordering 25 (4) FINAL DEVOICING {b, d, g, v, z, $} ! [p, t, k, f, s, x] / __] word
Voiced obstruents become devoiced at the end of a word. Much less commonly, sonorant consonants devoice. No one has come up for a really good explanation for why this process is so widely attested. It seems to have to do with the extra effort required to sustain voicing of an obstruent when not transitioning to a following vowel. (5) OBSTRUENT VOICING ASSIMILATION [-sonorant] ! [!voice] / __
! -sonorant "voice # $ % & ' ( Example: /b/ ! [p] / __t /p/ ! [b] / __d (An obstruentstop, fricative, affricate becomes voiced before a voiced obstruent and voiceless before a voiceless obstruent.) It is uncommon for languages to tolerate a sequence of two obstruents that disagree in voicing. If this takes the form of an active process, it is almost always the first one that assimilates to the second one (regressive assimilation). The motivation is clearly that it is hard to make a transition in voicing over the short duration that obstruents usually have, so the first consonant anticipates where the sequence will end up in terms of the [voice] feature. (6) (a) PALATALIZATION (CORONALS) {t, d} ! [t ! !, d ! "] / __{i, e} {s, z} ! [!, "] / __{i, e}
(b) PALATALIZATION (VELARS) {k, g} ! [t ! !, d ! "] / __{i, e} Both alveolar and velar consonants often become alveopalatal affricates before front vowels. This is a natural assimilation. For front vowels, the middle of the tongue is drawn toward the palate. Anticipation of the vowel causes the tongue to be drawn back of the normal position when aiming for an alveolar and to be drawn forward when aiming for a velar. Back and low vowels have much less tendency to draw the tongue away from its normal consonant position, which explains why, for example, alveopalatals do not become velars before back vowels. (7) FRICATIVE FORMATION /t ! !, d ! " / ! [!, "] Affricates tend NOT to become plain stops, but it is not uncommon for affricates to become corresponding fricatives. One can imagine reasons for why this is natural, for example the stop closure is not entirely completed before entering the fricative release of the affricate. Fricatives tend NOT to become affricates, with one exception: a fricative following a nasal often becomes affricated, as in English fence /f*ns/ ! [f*nt!s] The reason for this is that there must be an oral closure for the nasal, and this closure lags into the obstruent after the velum is raised. (8) NASAL ASSIMILATION [+nasal] ! [m, n, +] / __{p, t, k}
Or, stated more generally, a nasal assimilates to the point of articulation of a following consonant (usually an obstruent or another nasal). This is one of the most widespread phonological processes across the languages of the world. The natural motivation is clear: the nasal consonant anticipates the place of articulation of the following consonant, and dropping the velum before pronouncing the following consonant then raising it for the oral consonant is enough to maintain the nasal+consonant sequence. (9) DEGEMINATION C i C i ! C i
A double or long consonanta geminate becomes pronounced as a single or short consonanta singleton. Many languages do not like long consonants. For example, English innumerable is derived from in- not + numerable. but the resulting double nn- is reduced to [n]. Linguistics 120A 3. Natural Classes, Natural Rules, Rule Ordering 26 VOWELS
NATURAL PROCESS TOWARD EXPLAINING WHAT IS NATURAL (10) VOWEL ELISION V ! / __V Many languages do not like sequences of vowels (vowel hiatus), at least when the vowels form separate syllable peaks. Articulatorily, it seems more difficult to mark separate syllables by just an effort of the intercostal muscles than to constrict the air stream with an articulator like the tongue or lips. Perceptually, it is more difficult to hear separate syllables without the cues provided by constrictions in the air stream. Languages differ widely in details of vowel elision. The most common process seems to delete the first vowel, but often it makes a difference what the vowel combination is as to which vowel is deleted, for example, a language may prefer to keep /a/ over other vowels regardless of whether /a/ is first or second. (11) GLIDE FORMATION {i, u} ! [j, w] / __V
Somewhat less common {e, o} ! [j, w] / __V Non-low vowels often become the corresponding glides when they precede another vowel. This is an alternative process to VOWEL ELISION as a way to avoid vowel hiatus. Some languages use both processes, with the choice depending on the particular vowel combination. (12) VOWEL COALESCENCE {ai, au} ! [e, o] {aj, aw} ! [e, o] It is common for sequences of vowels (or combinations of vowels and glides) to merge, or coalesce to form monophthongs. The most common are those to the left, but many others also occur. (13) EPENTHESIS ! , / #C_C, C_C#, C_CC, etc. Two processes, epenthesis and syncope, are very common ways that languages use to make good syllables. Epenthesis is the insertion of a vowel to break up sequences of consonants. The schema to the left is common, that is, inserting a schwa to break up a sequence at the beginning or end of a word or to prevent three consonants from coming together. Languages vary widely as to the types of consonant sequences they (dis)allow and the vowels that they epenthesize. (14) SYNCOPE V ! / VC__CV Syncope is the deletion of a vowel from the middle of a word to allow consonants to come together if the syllables created would be acceptable. The environment to the left is by far the most common. Note that the result will be a sequence VCCV, that is, a sequence of just two consonants bracketed by vowels. (15) VOWEL ASSIMILATION TO C /a/ ! [*] / t ! !__ /a/ ! [-] / f__ Consonants can affect the pronunciation of vowels. The rules to the left are just examples, the first showing a low central vowel being drawn frontward after a palatal consonant, the second showing rounding of a low vowel after a labial. Languages vary widely as to the vowels that might be affected and the position and range of consonants that might condition the changes. Linguistics 120A 3. Natural Classes, Natural Rules, Rule Ordering 27 (16) (a) VOWEL TO VOWEL ASSIMILATION /a/ ! [&] / __Co /'/ ! [i] / __Ci
(b) VOWEL HARMONY (ROUNDING HARMONY) SUFF. /bE/: tati-be totu-b ([ATR] HARMONY) SUFF. /bE/: toti-be t&t.-b* (c) UMLAUT /musi/ ! [mysi] /mase/ ! [m(se] Vowels assimilating to each other, usually within a word, is common. VOWEL TO VOWEL ASSIMILATION is a general term referring to assimilation involving particular vowels, for example, a /,/ might become [u] if the next syllable contains a [u]. VOWEL HARMONY as a term for a phonological process should be restricted to cases where a language has two sets of vowels, say, [+round] and [-round] (as in Hungarian) or [+ATR] and [-ATR] (as in Akan), and all the vowels in a word must be from one set or the other. Vowel Harmony is generally a pattern of word formation rather than a phonological assimilation process, though it probably originates in assimilation that has become grammaticalized. UMLAUT refers specifically to fronting a vowel when the next syllable contains a front vowel, as in German Not [not] need, Nte [nt,] needs. The term umlaut is generally used only for Germanic languages, and, like Vowel Harmony, most cases of Umlaut are no longer active assimilation processes but have become associated with particular words or word classes.
RULE INTERACTIONS
Rule Ordering and Derivations
Sometimes independently needed rules interact such that one rule has to apply to the output of another in order to correctly account for the ultimate phonetic output.
ENGLISH BACK VOWEL DIPHTHONGIZATION and VELAR ASSIMILATION
ENGLISH BACK VOWEL DIPHTHONGIZATION: /u, o/ ! [u, o] / ___) [!"u, !" o] elsewhere VELAR ASSIMILATION (illustrated w. /k/): /k/ ! [k! ] / ___front vowels [k! ] / ___back rounded vowels [k] elsewhere Other rules: /l/ VELARIZATION, ASPIRATION
Here are two English words, their phonemic (= underlying) forms, and their phonetic forms:
Coke: /kok/, [k*!" ok] coal: /kol/, [k! *o)]
Propose a way to derive the phonetic forms from the underlying forms.
Cantonese palatalization In a practice problem for section 2, we saw the following complementary distribution data for Cantonese palatalization: 1. t ! !i ! Chinese characters *t!si 2. t ! !/i ! time, occasion *t!s"i 3. t ! !y ! pig *t!sy 4. t ! !/y ! place *t!s"y 5. t!se " borrow/lend *t! .e 6. t ! s"e # car *t! .*e 7. t ! !5n 6 allow *t!s 8. t ! !/5n 7 stupid *t!s" 9. t ! su, t ! s"u (do not exist) 10. t ! so 7 left (side) *t! .o 11. t ! s"o # wrong *t! .*o 12. t ! san 7 measure word for lamp *t! .a 13. t ! s"a # bad *t! .*a 14. si ! poem *.i 15. !y ! book *sy 16. se ! extravagant *.e 17. s5n ! fast *. 18. su (does not exist) 19. so ! comb *.o 20. sa ! sand *.a 21. tin ! mad 22. t!in " sky 23. tyn 7 short 24. t/yn 6 sever 25. te ! daddy 26. t!e" # listen 27. lyn ! messy 28. kin ! resolute 29. k!in " reverent 30. k!yn " authority 31. kyn ! donate 32. pin ! margin 33. p!in " knit 34. py, p/y (do not exist) Linguistics 120A 3. Natural Classes, Natural Rules, Rule Ordering 30 NOTE ON THE CANTONESE DATA: There seems to be a fair amount of variation across speakers, even those from Hong Kong. The unstarred and starred variants are those reported by Marissa Tse in the 120A paper referenced in the footnote on page 19. However, Hiu Wai Irene Lam, in a recording made in April 2011, seems to show a different distribution for words beginning in [ts ~ ts* ~ t. ~ t.*]. Finally, Christopher Fung, in a 120A paper, described data from two speakers who seem to differ from both those mentioned above!
1. Natural class of undergoers
(a) How would you group all and only the consonants that undergo palatalization as a natural class?
(b) The triggers for palatalization get a bit messy in terms of natural class. List the environments that trigger palatalization of /t!s, t!s"/, the ones that do not, and state the almost natural class that groups them. Then identify the problem. How does /s/ fit into this picture?
English Velar Assimilation
Recall that velar consonants in English (and probably most languages) assimilate to neighboring vowels. We have found that English velars assimilate to both preceding and following vowels, but when the preceding and following environments conflict, the following environment wins. Thus, we have the following realizations:
/k/ ! k! / ! " # $ % & + back V ___ /k/ ! k! / ___ ! " # $ % & + back V
Account for the phonetic outcomes from the underlying forms above using these rules and rule ordering.
Linguistics 120A 3. Natural Classes, Natural Rules, Rule Ordering 31 Korean verb suffixes and roots
(1) Deferential ending: Korean has an ending that can be added to verbs to indicate a deferential attitude toward the listener (for example, the announcements at the airport about unattended packages, etc. are filled with verbs bearing this ending). The ending has two forms, seen in GROUP 1 and GROUP 2.
NOTE ON WRITING: The ways the words are written here does not reflect the actual pronuciation after all phonological rules have applied. In particular, all stops are voiced between vowels and a stop before a nasal assimilates to the nasal. Thus, for example, the deferential form for go in GROUP 2 is phonetically [kamnida]. For this problem, however, we are concerned with just two phonological processes, which are unaffected by and do not interact with these other processes. The words are therefore written in a way to draw attention to the phonological aspects of interest here.
GROUP 1 GROUP 2 Citation Deferential Citation Deferential ipta ips8pnita wear clothes kata kapnita go patta pats1pnita get hata hapnita do n1t!.ta n1ts1pnita be late pota popnita see makta maks1pnita obstruct peta pepnita be used to usta uss1pnita laugh t!.*ita t!.*ipnita hit kamta kams1pnita close t!.*uta t!.*upnita dance sinta sins1pnita wear shoes s!s1ta s!s1pnita use
Formulate a deletion rule, making reference to natural classes of segments in the verb roots, that will will relate the two forms of the deferential ending.
(2) Phonological change of verb roots: Korean has many verb endings showing modalities, speaker attitudes, and the like. These endings can create a variety of phonological environments for the roots that they are attached to. Below are two tables showing several verbs with some of the available endings. PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE FORMS OF THE VERB ROOTS ABOVE AND BELOW THE HEAVY LINE IN THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN OF EACH TABLE.
NOTE ON WRITING: As already mentioned above, the transcription here does not fully reflect the actual pronunciation. In addition to the rules already mentioned, the phoneme written l here is pronounced [-] between vowels.
go get take on know Citation form kata patta anta alta Non-past polite kajo patajo anajo alajo and DOES kako patko anako alko of course DOES kat! .ijo patt! .ijo ant! .ijo alt!.jo if DOES kamj&n pat1mj&n an1mj&n almj&n revered subject DOES kasejo pat1sejo an1sejo asejo Linguistics 120A 3. Natural Classes, Natural Rules, Rule Ordering 32 surprisingly DOES kanejo patnejo annejo anejo should DO? kalk!kajo? pat1lk!kajo? an1lk!kajo? alk!kajo?
hit be late wear shoes be tall Citation form t!.*ita n1t!.ta sinta kilta Non-past polite t!.*&jo n1t!.&jo sin&jo kil&jo and DOES t!.*iko n1t!.ko sinko kilko of course DOES t!.*it!.ijo n1t!.t!.ijo sint! .ijo kilt! .ijo if DOES t!.*imj&n n1t!.1mj&n sin1mj&n kilmj&n revered subject DOES t!.*isejo n1t!.1sejo sin1sejo kisejo surprisingly DOES t!.*inejo n1t!.nejo sinnejo kinejo should DO? t!.*ilk!kajo? n1t!.1lk!kajo? sin1lk!kajo? kilk!kajo?
(a) Formulate a deletion rule that will account for the two forms of the roots seen in the verbs know and be tall. Refer to a natural class in the triggering environment: you will have to mention both place and manner of articulation.
(b) In the verbs in the two middle columns, a [1] shows up before the endings for if DOES, revered subject DOES, and should DO. State what might account for this [1] INSERTION in terms of the natural class of the final sounds of the roots of these verbs.
(3) Deferential endings and rule ordering: Here are the verbs from the two tables from part (2) with the deferential ending seen in part (1).
Citation Deferential patta pats1pnita get anta ans1pnita take on n1t!.ta n1ts1pnita be late sinta sins1pnita wear shoes kata kapnita go t!.*ita t!.*ipnita strike alta apnita know kilta kipnita be tall
Use rules you formulated for parts (1) and (2) plus rule ordering to account for the forms in the heavy box. Show how one order predicts the existing forms but the opposite order predicts incorrect forms.