100%(1)100% au considerat acest document util (1 vot)
85 vizualizări1 pagină
Peskin uses a lot of references from scientific literature with a certain amount of cherry-picking of those that fit his beliefs. 'I am not opposed to all EPA / DHA / marine oil supplementation if they are used in proper physiological amounts,' he says. But then he states, 'Fish oil is physiologically wrong, period.'
Peskin uses a lot of references from scientific literature with a certain amount of cherry-picking of those that fit his beliefs. 'I am not opposed to all EPA / DHA / marine oil supplementation if they are used in proper physiological amounts,' he says. But then he states, 'Fish oil is physiologically wrong, period.'
Peskin uses a lot of references from scientific literature with a certain amount of cherry-picking of those that fit his beliefs. 'I am not opposed to all EPA / DHA / marine oil supplementation if they are used in proper physiological amounts,' he says. But then he states, 'Fish oil is physiologically wrong, period.'
25 founded the eld of ) but I do not think that is his motive at all. Peskin tells it as he sees it and I think that his assertion may irritate, more due to American style of writing and present- ing than as a valid criticism of bigotry toward his views. There is some paradox as he uses a lot of references from scientic literature with a certain amount of cherry-pick- ing of those that t his beliefs. In his defence, he accepts that he has selected papers, but not to support his theory, more to dismiss inaccurate research. Absolutely correct..., he says, I chose highly controlled studies... Nevertheless he does not pop in too many to dispel his arguments! Few of us will read most of the 15,000 he has dismissed but we may select a few, argue they are accurate and this perhaps will weaken his posi- tion. Peskin may put too much empha- sis on animal studies and he may not have a practitioners view of single nutri- ents as opposed to Natures complexes in prescribing to patients, but overall I feet he is right in his arguments. And what if he is right overall? He argues quantity does not override quality, the issue of proving cause and effect as opposed to associating one medicine or supplement with a con- dition and yet he arguably contradicts himself in places: I am not opposed to all EPA/DHA/marine oil supplementa- tion if they are used in proper physiolog- ical amounts. But then he states, Fish oil is physiologically wrong, period. PEO Solution reminds or teaches us that omega 6 is not only an inamma- tory EFA, but also provides foundation to vital, anti-inammatory processes and has both functional and structural roles too. It is adulterated omega 6 (dam- aged by food processing, incorrect stor- age, rancidity, heat, additives, etc) that is bad. Oops, I have to admit my training said: excess omega 6 bad, excess omega 3 good surely? No, he reminds us that chains and industrial food giants. To the authors credit, they never sensationalise the shocking scenes they witness, preferring simply to convey the facts and expose the reality of a brazenly exploitive empire conveniently sanitised and dressed-up as a caring, quality-con- trolled, production system bringing you, the consumer, everything you could ever wish for and all in the air-conditioned convenience of your local hypermarket. Fortunately, the reader is guided toward both personal and more gen- eral solutions, under such headings as How to avoid the coming crisis and Consumer power what you can do. They are both pragmatic and realis- tic guides for the perplexed, sensibly encouraging readers to buy local from producers one comes to trust and respect and not wasting food by over-buying, and avoiding over-eating meat products. Human health is recognised as being dependent upon soils, animals and plants being treated as vital, living organisms whose optimum growth is achieved by using natural ingredients and through the adoption of a caring, loving attitude that is the antithesis of the sub-human battleground that epito- mises the 21st century factory farm. All in all, I would strongly recom- mend this book to anyone who wants a grounded, undiluted account of the machinations of the global food industry and its devastating affect on the lives of millions of sentient beings, including ourselves. Sir Julian Rose (www.julianrose.info) is an early pioneer of UK organic farming, a writer, broadcaster and activist. He is currently President of The International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside. His latest book, In Defence of Life Essays on a Radical Reworking of Green Wisdom, is available in book- shops and online. EVOLUTION An Odyssey: Reconciling Science to God Philippa A Rees CollaborArt Books, 2013 (www.involu- tion-odyssey.com). Pb, 427pp, 17.99/ ebook 4.99. ISBN978 0957500204 Reviewed by David Lorimer P hilippa Rees is a polymath brought up in South Africa who studied literature, science and theology and who has brought these strands together with her own experience in this brilliant epic poem telling the story of the Western Odyssey of the mind with parallel expla- nations in 150 pages of notes. She has been working on this theory of involution for many years and was in correspondence with Arthur Koestler, Konrad Lorenz and EF Schumacher in the 70s. The nine Cantos of blank verse a dialogue between Reason and Soul reminiscent of Iain McGilchrists The Master and His Emissary chart our cosmic journey, ending up, with a phase of love and reunion in which we come full circle. The introduction explains the thesis of the book and the meaning of invo- lution in this context. It is related to collective memory through acts of con- sciousness, recovering and transcending what has gone before. Genius plays the role of being an advanced emissary of consciousness enabling others to follow in their understanding. Rees understanding of the basic impetus of evolution is not accidental mutation but rather behaviour or act as the critical driver of change. This is elaborated in the series of six propositions: Interaction leads to interiorisation Internal selection increasingly over- rides natural selection mind is the driver of change Interactions between organisms and environment are retained as memory the development of mind leads to autonomy Matter is in-formed by mind through memory Memory of evolution is stored Involution in man occurs through the recovery of memory we have the entire memory of our evolutionary path and understand its connection with everything else. Consciousness is able to return to its origins and recover a lost sense of wholeness. The theory has parallels with the work of Teilhard de Chardin, Ervin Laszlo, David Bohm, Carl Jung and Rupert Sheldrake, all of whom have found their own ways of reconciling the scientic with the spiritual. Many readers would agree that we are paying a high price for sciences limited certainties by exclud- ing subjective experience in terms of rev- elation, inspiration and intuition. Rees approach opens up access to these realms, all the more so through the use of poetry as her medium and a coun- terbalance to the dominance of the left hemisphere not only in science, but also in academia in general. This is scientia in its broader form as acknowledged by the perennial philosophy essentially intuited rather than deduced. The dialogue between Reason and Soul is sometimes tense, sometimes cre- ative. Reason is always wanting to cut to the chase in a literal fashion, while Soul is more expansive and imaginative. Reason refers disdainfully to a spoonful of soft syllables to help all sophistry slip down and is a little impatient with the paradoxes of quantum mechanics. Soul reminds the reader that: The world is all en-folded mind. The yeast of any forward thinker Leavens the whole loaf entire. The reader is able to consult the footnotes on the way through and alternate between the mode of poetic narrative and more detailed background explanation, which demonstrates the authors considerable erudition. The reader passes through the early states of unity what Bareld called original participation through the genesis of tools and language, the world of the Greeks, Archimedes and Alexandria, the Dark Ages and the preservation of cul- ture through monasteries and Muslim thought, the Renaissance (especially art) then the Enlightenment and rationality leading onto Modernism and dissolution before nally arriving at love and reun- ion, where Reason falls silent and Soul continues the narrative. Following on is an appendix discuss- ing the relationship between mysticism and science and drawing on William James, among others, but also mystics from different cultures. Some mathema- ticians like Poincar and Penrose have followed in the footsteps of Plato and understand harmony in a deeper way. In an Afterword, Reason and Soul explore the authors experiences leading to her thesis the brain is the souls receiver. I should also mention that there are informative charts at the end of each set of canto as a way of conveying informa- tion in a different mode. I know of no comparable work cov- ering the Western Odyssey in its many thematic variations using an interplay of poetry and prose to convey the adven- ture of the journey that arrives at a more comprehensive understanding of reality as a whole. The authors grasp of the principal elements of Western culture is masterly and her poetic narrative is woven together with extraordinary subtlety and eloquence. The result is a heroic tour de force that deserves the wid- est readership. David Lorimer is editor of the Scientic and Medicals Network Review (www. scimednet.org), in whose Winter, 2013, issue the original of this shortened review rst appeared. I had to overcome obstacles of ego and incredulity when reviewing this book. The enormity of their suggestion that I, among the majority of nutritionally trained doctors, practi- tioners and health journalists, have been prescribing for decades, sh and crusta- cean (krill) oil to our patients detriment was, to say the least, worrying. Nothing equivocal, no leeway: sh oils are bad. Peskin is an electrical engineer, graduate of the prestigious MIT in the USA, and held a Professorship; Rowen is a prolic educationist, so their views should be considered seriously. They start off by reminding us how nutritional advances are trum- peted as good, then all too frequently are denounced as bad. They simply state: Recommendations keep getting reversed and move swiftly to the main thesis of the book that health advi- sors and practitioners have been ill-ad- vised regarding prescribing essential fatty acids from sea creatures. To support this, Peskin sets out to prove we are all frequently misled and the rst half of the book is a mixture of explanation of how medical studies are often unscientically conducted, with an expos of bad scientists and bad science, naughty pharmaceutical giants and inadequate research, poor report- ing to the public all of which lead to incorrect prescribing. He mentions the difculty of going against mainstream thinking and the issue of money inu- encing health advice, pointing out that much published science cannot be rep- licated and statistics are manipulated to t expectations. He sites the scepticism many pure scientists have of medical research and frequently refers us back to the work of Nobel Prize winners, Richard Feynman and Otto Warburg, in an attempt to steer us away from our current acceptance of evidence as it is presented which is too often promoting a commercial interest. One may criticise Peskin for some blunderbuss and self-promotion (I PEO Solution by Brian Peskin, BSc, and Robert Rowen, MD Pinnacle Press, Houston, Texas, 2013. Pb, 507pp, $27.50/16.99/Nutri Centre, London Reviewed by Rajendra Sharma is not the case. I feel he has successfully re-educated me. My colleague, Dr Elisabeth Philipps, points out: The authors make a lot of assumptions that people are eating daily portions of seafood so they are getting omega 3 physiological requirements through diet alone something that is just not the case generally in the UK. We eat far more omega 6 EFAs in our daily diet, hence the more common need for omega 3 supplementation. She further points out, There is little discussion about the long, energy- and nutrient-dependent conversion process of PEOs into derivatives, not to mention digestion of PEOs in the rst place. The common, frankly unhealthy, diet is usually heavily imbalanced toward omega 6 EFAs mostly adulterated thus skewing the omega 6:omega 3 ratio. Also, Peskin is quick to dismiss our attitude that genetic ability of our regulation of desaturases to convert PEO from plant oils is not effective in many of us. Many cannot. Also, DHA and EPA are directly absorbed into the bloodstream from the gut, bypassing the need for lipase and bile for digestion, which is often compromised in many of those who are ill. I am at a point where I feel obtain- ing omega 3 from sh and crustaceans cannot be bad in all cases and I am struggling to dismiss what I have consid- ered good evidence in so many outcome studies, particularly in the arena of the treatment in autistic spectrum disorder, chronic inammatory joint disease and certain skin disorders. Cardiac issues are rarely treated with sh oils alone so per- haps too much emphasis may have been placed on arterial EPA/DHA effect. What Peskin professes I think demands that we are eating a good diet. If so, supplementary EFA should be in a ratio of omega 6:omega 3 of 1:1 or up to 2.5:1 but not higher. Our use of high omega 3 in supra-physiological dosages is harmful and pharmacological sup- plements provide overdose. Fish-based diets are okay but Peskin points out that Eskimos have low arterial disease not because of the oily sh they eat; it is not the predominant nutrient in their diet, which is higher in omega 6. I sug- gest that those with bad diets may need higher omega 3, perhaps? The latter chapters identify and ref- erence how PEOs help answer many of our ailments, skin disease, diabetes, heart disease and, inevitably, cancer, so overall, I came away feeling he may be spot on. I will certainly be paying attention to what is said on the web by the likes of Dr Mercola, who continues his consid-