Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Turbulence:
Future Problems
Motivation
We start with an experimental report
summarized by the three plots in Fig.1 .
We take off from this experimental
observation to suggest a proposition,
which we now state:
The failure of the continuum theory
in describing turbulence is signaled by
a singularity in the form: acceleration
of an infinitesimal volume at a point
is –infinity.
4
x 10 1b: N2 dV/dt
0.50.5
00
!0.5
-0.5
(a)
d
/
!1.0
V
-1
-1.5
!1.5
!2.0-2
dV/dt (arb. units)
!2.5
-2.5
0 0.1 0.2 2b: C O20.3
dV/dt 0.4 0.5 0.6
1.0
1000 Time (s )
0 .0 0
.0
!1 -1000
!2
t
.0
-2000
(b)
d
/
.0
!3 -3000
V
d
.0
!4 -4000
.0
!5 -5000
.0
!6 -6000
.0
!7 -7000 0 4 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
x 10 3b: Air dV/dt
Time (s )
0.50.5
00
! 0.5
-0.5
!td1.0-1
/
V
(c)
!d1.5
-1.5
! 2.0-2
! 2.5
-2.5
Fig.1 – Occurrence of transition spikes in efflux experiments in (a) argon, (b) carbon dioxide and (c) air.
Taking the failure of continuum
theory as a given, we now
attempt to re-define turbulence
in our own way.
Proposition I
• A gas is turbulent when the steady-
state solutions of the relevant transport
equation produce a multi-valued
velocity field. Each steady-state
solution will be realized as a snapshot
of the velocity field. Other snapshots
can be produced by other allowed
steady states. In time, the velocity field
changes as transitions occur from one
allowed steady state solution to
another.
Fig. 2 – An example: velocity field inside a toroidal model from the exact solutions
for the steady-state post-Navier Stokes equation proposed by Getreur, Albano and Muriel [10].
The top and bottom panels differ in the probability of kicks σ from the “quantum paddle”
Adopted from Ref. [10], courtesy of Elsevier.
Proposition II
• A gas consisting of ground state
molecules is laminar. A similar gas
consisting of excited molecules is
turbulent. By virtue of the Boltzmann
distribution, a gas will consist of
laminar and turbulent flow. This
proposition is consistent with a lore
orally transmitted by Russian
researchers from Lev Landau, who
suggested that there is always
turbulence in a real gas, it is a matter of
degree.
We will go back to Proposition I later.
In the meantime Proposition II is encapsulated
by a simple diagram below:
Laminar Turbulent
3200
3000
Re
2800
2600
0 2 4 6 8
P/Pc
H2O & D2O
0.08
0.07 Re(H2O) = 3020
0.06 Re(D2O) = 3480
Friction factor
0.05
0.04
0.03 H2O
D2O
0.02
2000 3000 4000
1000
Re
1/ 3 1/ 3
(a) vc1 & '1 # &P #
=$ ! = $$ 1 !!
vc 2 $% ' 2 !" % P2 " (Muriel, Physica A)
1/ 3 4/3
(b) vc1 & '1 # & m2 #
=$ ! $$ !!
vc 2 $% ' 2 !" % m1 " (Muriel, Physica A)
(3) New Scaling Law on Turbulent Efflux
f & P#
=$ !
f %P "
o o
$u
= #%"u + (u • ! )u + !p = f
$t
Examples of transport equations
from which turbulence may
arise:
Burgers Equation a la Imperio-Esguerra
#u 1 #u 2 $!
+ " $u =
#t 2 #x m
#U i 1 $!
+ U j # jU i + $U i = " # j Pij "
#t % m
Next:
• Solis-Esguerra transport equation
Experimental