Lorentz Force Applications 2

Alan Caldern
1. Abstract
This document thries to explain what could be
happen if the speed of light is not a constant. The
relativistic case was studied from article [1], because
the author analyzes interestingly the relativity theory
by Matlab. In this document is solved the same
relativistic equations but assumed the speed of light
C as a non constant function.
2. The Lorentz Force application in classical
physics
The following equations show the behavior of an
electrical charge which is moving in presence of
electric field and magnetic field.

dP/dt = q(E + VB) .(2.1)
dP/dt = q(E + (VyBz -VzBy)i + (BxVz - VxBz)j +
(VxBy - VyBx)k) .(2.2)
As it is knowledge:
P = mV .(2.3)
Initial conditions:
X = 0i, Y = [(mV)(qB)]j, Z = 0k, E = Ek, B = Bk,
Px = mVi, Py = 0j, Pz = 0k;
Replacing in (2.2):
dP/dt = q(Ek + VyBzi - VxBzj) .(2.4)
In every axes:

dP/dt = qVyBz i .(2.5)
solving:
Px = qVyB(t - t) ..(2.5.1)
Vx = (qVyB(t - t))m ..(2.5.2)
X = (qVyB((t^2)2-tt+(t^2)2))(m)
X=(qVyB(t - t)^2)2m ..(2.5.3)

dP/dt = -qVxBz j .(2.6)
solving:
Py = -qVxB(t - t) ..(2.6.1)
Vy = (-qVxB(t - t))m ..(2.6.2)
Y = -(qVxB((t^2)2-tt+(t^2)2))(m)
Y= -(qVxB(t - t)^2)2m ..(2.6.3)

dP/dt = qEk .(2.7)
solving:
Pz = qE(t - t) ..(2.7.1)
Vy = (qE(t - t))m ..(2.7.2)
Z = (qE((t^2)2-tt+(t^2)2))(m)
Z = (qE(t - t)^2)2m ..(2.7.3)

The code to analyze the last system equation is shown
[1] and is verified in the following lines:

The code to represent the magnetic field:
function [Bx,By,Bz]=fieldBTUI1(x,y,z,t)
Bx=0;
By=0;
Bz=0.05;

The code to represent the Electrical field:
function [Ex,Ey,Ez] = fieldETUI1(x,y,z,t)
Ex=0;
Ey=0;
Ez=3.00E+06;

The code to express the differential equation is given
by the code:
function df = odeclassicEBTUI1(t,f,q,m)
c=2.997925E+08;%m/s
q=-1.602177E-19;%C
m=9.109382E-31;%kg
x=f(1);
y=f(2);
z=f(3);
px=f(4);
py=f(5);
pz=f(6);
p=sqrt(px.^2 + py.^2 + pz.^2);
vx=px*(m^-1);
vy=py*(m^-1);
vz=pz*(m^-1);
[Ex,Ey,Ez]=fieldETUI1(x,y,z,t);
[Bx,By,Bz]=fieldBTUI1(x,y,z,t);
dpxdt=q*(Ex + vy*Bz-By*vz);
dpydt=q*(Ey + vz*Bx-Bz*vx);
dpzdt=q*(Ez + vx*By-Bx*vy);
df=[vx;vy;vz;dpxdt;dpydt;dpzdt];
end

The code to resolve the differential equation:
%To execute the principal code
t=[0:0.000001:0.0001];
c=100;
q=-1.602176E-19;%C
m=9.109382E-31;%Kg
vi=2*c/3;
%Initial conditions:
pxi=m*vi;
pyi=0;
pzi=0;
xi=0;
yi=pxi/(q*0.05);
zi=0;
%Solving:
[t,f]=ode45('odeclassicEBTUI1',t,[xi yi zi pxi
pyi pzi]);
x = f(:,1);
y = f(:,2);
z = f(:,3);
figure(1);
%Position in every axis
plot3(x,y,z);
xlabel('x(m)'),ylabel('y(m)'),zlabel('z(m)'),gri
d,...
px = f(:,4);
py = f(:,5);
pz = f(:,6);
figure(2);
%Linear momentum in every axis
plot3(px,py,pz);
xlabel('px(kg*m/s)'),ylabel('py(kg*m/s)'),zlabel
('pz(kg*m/s)'),grid,...
p=sqrt(px.^2+py.^2+pz.^2);
figure(3);
%Linear momentum total
plot(t,p);
xlabel('t(s)'),ylabel('p(kg*m/s)'),grid,...

The figure 1 shows the trajectory run by the electrical
charge:

Figure 1: Trajectory run by the electrical charge.

The linear momentum of the electrical charge in
every axis is shown in the figure 2:
Nooo!!!!!!!!

Figure 2: Linear momentum of the electrical charge
in every axis.

The figure 3 shows the Linear momentum result of
the electrical charge:

Figure 3: Linear momentum (kgms) result versus
time (s).

If is it analyzed the last process with relativity. The
codes to express the electrical and magnetic fields are
given by the codes fieldE and fieldB, shown in last
paragraphs.
The code to express the differential equation:
function df=odeEB(t,f,q,m)
%Particle coordinates
c=2.99792458E+08;%m/s
q=-1.60217649E-19;%C
m=9.10938215E-31;%kg
x=f(1);
y=f(2);
z=f(3);
-5
0
5
x 10
-4
-5
0
5
x 10
-4
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
x 10
9
x(m)
y(m)
z
(
m
)
-4
-2
0
2
4
x 10
-24
-4
-2
0
2
4
x 10
-24
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
x 10
-17
Px
Py
P
z
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
x 10
-4
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
x 10
-17
t
P
%Particle momentum
Px=f(4);
Py=f(5);
Pz=f(6);
%Particle energy
P=sqrt(Px.^2+Py.^2+Pz.^2);
E=sqrt(P^2*c^2+m^2*c^4);
%Particle velocity
Vx=Px*c^2/E;
Vy=Py*c^2/E;
Vz=Pz*c^2/E;
%Electric and magnetic fields
[Ex,Ey,Ez]=fieldE(x,y,z,t);
[Bx,By,Bz]=fieldB(x,y,z,t);
%ode
dPxdt=q*(Ex + Vy*Bz - Vz*By);
dPydt=q*(Ey + Vz*Bx - Vx*Bz);
dPzdt=q*(Ez + Vx*By - Vy*Bx);
df=[Vx;Vy;Vz;dPxdt;dPydt;dPzdt];
end



The code to code to solve the last differential
equation code is given by:
%t=[0:0.001:1];
t=[0:0.00000001:0.0001];
c=2.99792458E+08;%m/s
q=-1.60217649E-19;%C
m=9.10938215E-31;%kg


Vi=2*c/3;
gammin=1/(1-Vi^2/c^2)^1/2;
Pxi=gammin*m*Vi;
Pyi=0;
Pzi=0;
Xi=0;
Yi=Pxi/(q*0.05);
Zi=0;


[t,f] = ode45('odeEB',t,[Xi Yi Zi Pxi
Pyi Pzi]);
x=f(:,1);
y=f(:,2);
z=f(:,3);
figure(1);
plot3(x,y,z);
xlabel('X'),ylabel('Y'),zlabel('Z'),gr
id,...
Px=f(:,4);
Py=f(:,5);
Pz=f(:,6);
figure(2);
plot3(Px,Py,Pz);
xlabel('Px'),ylabel('Py'),zlabel('Pz')
,grid,...
P=sqrt(Px.^2+Py.^2+Pz.^2);
figure(3);
plot(t,P);
xlabel('t'),ylabel('P'),grid,...
E=sqrt(P.^2*c^2+m^2*c^4);
figure(4);
plot(t,E);
xlabel('t'),ylabel('E'),grid,...

The figure 4 shows the trajectory made by the
electrical charge, analyzed by relativity.









Figure 4: Trajectory analyzed by relativity.


The figure 5 shows the linear momentum for every
axis analyzed by relativity in the electrical charge:
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
x 10
4
X
Y
Z

Figure 5: Linear momentum analyzed by Relativity.


The figure 6 shows the linear momentum result:

Figure 6: Linear momentum result analyzed by
relativity.

The figure 7 shows the energy of the electrical charge
analyzed by relativity. This expression cant by
achieved by classical analysis.

Figure 7: Energy of the electrical charge analyzed by
relativity.
But what happen if the speed of light is not a
constant? I propose one mathematical modeling by
the speed of light, which is only summarize the
classical constant C with one armonic function with
amplitude and frequency controllable by the
simulator
The code shows the differential equation:
function df=odeCalchavEB(t,f,q,m)
%Particle coordinates
c=2.99792458E+08 +
1000000.*sin(t);%m/s
%c=2.99792458E+08;%m/s
q=-1.60217649E-19;%C
m=9.10938215E-31;%kg
x=f(1);
y=f(2);
z=f(3);
%Particle momentum
Px=f(4);
Py=f(5);
Pz=f(6);
%Particle energy
P=sqrt(Px.^2+Py.^2+Pz.^2);
E=sqrt((P.^2)'.*c.^2+m^2*c.^4);
%Particle velocity
Vx=(Px.*(c.^2))./E;
Vy=(Py.*(c.^2))./E;
Vz=(Pz.*(c.^2))./E;
%Electric and magnetic fields
[Ex,Ey,Ez]=fieldE(x,y,z,t);
[Bx,By,Bz]=fieldB(x,y,z,t);
%ode
dPxdt=q*(Ex + Vy*Bz - Vz*By);
dPydt=q*(Ey + Vz*Bx - Vx*Bz);
dPzdt=q*(Ez + Vx*By - Vy*Bx);
df=[Vx;Vy;Vz;dPxdt;dPydt;dPzdt];
-2
-1
0
1
2
x 10
-22
-2
-1
0
1
2
x 10
-22
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
x 10
-17
Px
Py
P
z
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
x 10
-4
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
x 10
-17
t
P
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
x 10
-4
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
x 10
-8
t
E
end
The code to solve the last equation is:
t=[0:0.1:3600];
%t=[0:0.00000001:0.0001];
c=2.99792458E+08 +
1000000000.*sin(t);%m/s
%c=2.99792458E+08;%m/s
%c=100;
q=-1.60217649E-19;%C
m=9.10938215E-31;%kg

Vi=2*c(1)/3;
gammin=1/(1-(Vi^2)/(c(1)^2))^1/2;
%gammin=1;
Pxi=gammin*m*Vi;
Pyi=0;
Pzi=0;
Xi=0;
Yi=Pxi/(q*0.05);
zi=0;

[t,f] = ode45('odeCalchavEB',t,[Xi Yi
zi Pxi Pyi Pzi]);
x=f(:,1);
y=f(:,2);
z=f(:,3);
figure(1);
plot3(x,y,z);
xlabel('X'),ylabel('Y'),zlabel('Z'),gr
id,...
Px=f(:,4);
Py=f(:,5);
Pz=f(:,6);
figure(2);
plot3(Px,Py,Pz);
xlabel('Px'),ylabel('Py'),zlabel('Pz')
,grid,...
P=sqrt(Px.^2+Py.^2+Pz.^2);
figure(3);
plot(t,P);
xlabel('t'),ylabel('P'),grid,...
E=sqrt((P.^2)'.*c.^2+m^2*c.^4);
%%%Error!!! "Confabulation????"
figure(4);
plot(t,E);
xlabel('t'),ylabel('E'),grid,...

In the rane of time t=[0:0.00000001:0.0001];
The figure 8 shows the trajectory by every axis
analyzed with C variable in the electrical charge.


The figure 8 shows the trajectory by every axis
analyzed with C variable in the electrical charge.



Figure 8: Linear Momentum with C variable.

The figure 9 shows the Linear Momentum result
analyzed with C variable for the electrical charge:
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
x 10
4
X
Y
Z
-2
-1
0
1
2
x 10
-22
-2
-1
0
1
2
x 10
-22
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
x 10
-17
Px
Py
P
z

Figure 9: Linear momentum result analyzed with C
variable.

The figure 10 shows the energy analyzed with C
variable.


Figure 10: Energy analyzed with C variable.

In the range of time:
t=[0:0.1:3600];

The figure 11 shows the trajectory analyzed with C
variable during 1 hour.


Figure 11: Trajectory with c variable during 1 hour.











The figure 12 shows the Linear momentum analyzed
with C variable during 1 hour.


Figure 12: Linear Momentum with C variable during
1 hour.

The figure 13 shows the linear momentum result
analyzed with C variable during 1 hour.
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
x 10
-4
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
x 10
-17
t
P
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
x 10
-4
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
x 10
-8
t
E
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
x 10
11
X
Y
Z
-2
-1
0
1
2
x 10
-22
-2
-1
0
1
2
x 10
-22
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
x 10
-9
Px
Py
P
z


Figure 13: Linear momentum resul analyzed during
1 hour.

The figure 14 shows the energy analyzed with C
variable during 1 hour.


Figure 14: Energy analyzed with C variable

The figure 15 shows the expansion of the figure 14.

Figure 15: Energy analyzed during 1 hour with C
variable.

Was obtained one variable expression for the
energy of the particle
3. Conclutions
Was designed and solved mathematica models to
describe the trajectory of one electrical charge inside
magnetic and electrical fields. The analysis was made
by classical and relativistic cases, also was proposed
one model to describe what could be the behavior of
the electrical charge if travel at speed proportional to
speed of light but variable as armonic function.

4. Sugestions
It is necessary warrant the results achieved with
experimental results.


5. Anexs

6. References
[1] Erick Anterrieu;
How to make attractive the teaching of
relativistic electrodynamics
[2] RODILLOS NO REDONDOS, RUEDAS
CUADRADAS Y OTROS
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
x 10
-9
t
P
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
t
E
3460 3480 3500 3520 3540 3560
0.496
0.498
0.5
0.502
0.504
0.506
0.508
0.51
0.512
0.514
0.516
t
E
Msc. Engineer Hugo Medina Guzmn.
[3] Fine Structure Constant and Variable speed of
Light
Guoyou Huang.
Bibliography:
RICHARD FEYNMAN;
Lectures on Physics.