Correlations

1. EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES ON GREEN STORE DESIGN

Correlations


Explicit
defination of
environmental
policy
clear objectives
and long term
environmental
plans
adopts green
store design for
waste
reduction
adopt green
store design for
energy
conservation
and utilization
Explicit defination of
environmental policy
Pearson Correlation
1 .468(**) .064 .026
Sig. (2-tailed)
.002 .687 .871
N
42 42 42 42
clear objectives and long
term environmental plans
Pearson Correlation
.468(**) 1 .538(**) .405(**)
Sig. (2-tailed)
.002 .000 .008
N
42 42 42 42
adopts green store design
for waste reduction
Pearson Correlation
.064 .538(**) 1 .683(**)
Sig. (2-tailed)
.687 .000 .000
N
42 42 42 42
adopt green store design
for energy conservation
and utilization
Pearson Correlation
.026 .405(**) .683(**) 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.871 .008 .000
N
42 42 42 42
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).



2. EFFECT OF GREEN STORE DESIGN ON CUSTOMER PREFERENCE
Correlations


adopts green
store design for
waste
reduction
adopt green
store design for
energy
conservation
and utilization
preference for
green
products in
purchasing
adopts green store design
for waste reduction
Pearson Correlation
1 .683(**) .297
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000 .056
N
42 42 42
adopt green store design
for energy conservation
and utilization
Pearson Correlation
.683(**) 1 .180
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000 .255
N
42 42 42
preference for green
products in purchasing
Pearson Correlation
.297 .180 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.056 .255
N
42 42 42
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).



3. GREEN STORE DESIGN AND RECYCLING SYSTEM
Correlations


adopts green
store design for
waste reduction
adopt green store
design for energy
conservation and
utilization
recuperation and
recycling system
adopts green store design for
waste reduction
Pearson Correlation
1 .683(**) -.044
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000 .781
N
42 42 42
adopt green store design for
energy conservation and
utilization
Pearson Correlation
.683(**) 1 -.071
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000 .655
N
42 42 42
recuperation and recycling
system
Pearson Correlation
-.044 -.071 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.781 .655
N
42 42 42
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).


4. MANAGEMENT SUPPORT AND GMP CONTROL PROCEDEURE

Correlations


well-
defined
environm
ental
responsibi
lites
full-time
employee
s devoted
to
environm
ental
managem
ent
natural
environ
ment
training
program
mes for
manager
s and
employe
es
adopts
green
human
resource
develop
ment
practices
product
planning
and
control
focused
on
reducing
waste
and
optimiza
tion
material
s
exploitat
ion
systems
for
measuring
and
assessing
environm
ental
performa
nce
periodic
elaboratio
n of
environm
ental
reports
regular
voluntary
informati
on about
environm
ental
mangeme
nt to
customers
and
institution
s
environm
ental
emergenc
y plans
well-
defined
environm
ental
responsibi
lites
Pearson
Correlat
ion
1 -.145 -.010 .259 .178 -.295 .036 -.029 -.016
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.359 .948 .098 .259 .058 .819 .853 .921
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
full-time
employee
s devoted
to
environm
ental
managem
ent
Pearson
Correlat
ion
-.145 1 .801(**) -.104 .280 .196 .664(**) .337(*) .169
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.359 .000 .512 .073 .214 .000 .029 .285
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
natural
environm
Pearson
Correlat
-.010 .801(**) 1 -.111 .224 .104 .607(**) .400(**) .311(*)
ent
training
programm
es for
managers
and
employee
s
ion
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.948 .000 .483 .154 .511 .000 .009 .045
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
adopts
green
human
resource
developm
ent
practices
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.259 -.104 -.111 1 .584(**) -.311(*) -.190 .003 -.104
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.098 .512 .483 .000 .045 .229 .986 .514
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
product
planning
and
control
focused
on
reducing
waste and
optimizati
on
materials
exploitati
on
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.178 .280 .224 .584(**) 1 -.273 .150 .171 .115
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.259 .073 .154 .000 .081 .343 .279 .469
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
systems
for
measuring
and
assessing
environm
ental
performa
nce
Pearson
Correlat
ion
-.295 .196 .104 -.311(*) -.273 1 .058 -.105 .174
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.058 .214 .511 .045 .081 .716 .510 .269
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
periodic
elaboratio
n of
environm
ental
reports
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.036 .664(**) .607(**) -.190 .150 .058 1 .247 .371(*)
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.819 .000 .000 .229 .343 .716 .115 .016
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
regular
voluntary
informati
on about
environm
ental
mangeme
nt to
customers
and
institution
s
Pearson
Correlat
ion
-.029 .337(*) .400(**) .003 .171 -.105 .247 1 .050
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.853 .029 .009 .986 .279 .510 .115 .754
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
environm
ental
emergenc
Pearson
Correlat
ion
-.016 .169 .311(*) -.104 .115 .174 .371(*) .050 1
y plans Sig. (2-
tailed)
.921 .285 .045 .514 .469 .269 .016 .754
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).



5.GMP CONTROL PROCEDURE AND RECYCLING
Correlations


product
planning and
control focused
on reducing
waste and
optimization
materials
exploitation
systems for
measuring and
assessing
environmental
performance
periodic
elaboration of
environmental
reports
regular
voluntary
information
about
environmental
mangement to
customers and
institutions
recuperation
and recycling
system
product planning and
control focused on reducing
waste and optimization
materials exploitation
Pearson Correlation
1 -.273 .150 .171 .225
Sig. (2-tailed)
.081 .343 .279 .151
N
42 42 42 42 42
systems for measuring and
assessing environmental
performance
Pearson Correlation
-.273 1 .058 -.105 -.034
Sig. (2-tailed)
.081 .716 .510 .833
N
42 42 42 42 42
periodic elaboration of
environmental reports
Pearson Correlation
.150 .058 1 .247 .139
Sig. (2-tailed)
.343 .716 .115 .381
N
42 42 42 42 42
regular voluntary
information about
environmental mangement
to customers and
institutions
Pearson Correlation
.171 -.105 .247 1 .301
Sig. (2-tailed)
.279 .510 .115 .052
N
42 42 42 42 42
recuperation and recycling
system
Pearson Correlation
.225 -.034 .139 .301 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.151 .833 .381 .052
N
42 42 42 42 42



6.GMP CONTROL PROCEDURE AND CLEANER TRANSPORTATION
Correlations


product
planning and
control focused
on reducing
waste and
optimization
materials
exploitation
systems for
measuring and
assessing
environmental
performance
periodic
elaboration of
environmental
reports
regular
voluntary
information
about
environmental
mangement to
customers and
institutions
selection of
cleaner
transportation
methods
product planning and
control focused on reducing
waste and optimization
materials exploitation
Pearson Correlation
1 -.273 .150 .171 .350(*)
Sig. (2-tailed)
.081 .343 .279 .023
N
42 42 42 42 42
systems for measuring and
assessing environmental
performance
Pearson Correlation
-.273 1 .058 -.105 -.030
Sig. (2-tailed)
.081 .716 .510 .850
N
42 42 42 42 42
periodic elaboration of
environmental reports
Pearson Correlation
.150 .058 1 .247 .315(*)
Sig. (2-tailed)
.343 .716 .115 .042
N
42 42 42 42 42
regular voluntary
information about
environmental mangement
to customers and
institutions
Pearson Correlation
.171 -.105 .247 1 .062
Sig. (2-tailed)
.279 .510 .115 .696
N
42 42 42 42 42
selection of cleaner
transportation methods
Pearson Correlation
.350(*) -.030 .315(*) .062 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.023 .850 .042 .696
N
42 42 42 42 42
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).


7.EFFECT OF POLICY ON GREEN TECHNOLOGY
Correlations


Explicit
defination
of
environme
ntal policy
clear
objectives
and long
term
environme
ntal plans
sponsering of
environmental
events/collbor
ation with
ecological
organization
risposab
le
disposal
of waste
and
residues
(separat
ion and
preprati
on)
acquisition of
clean
technology/equi
pment
emissi
on
filters
and
end-
of-
pipe
contro
l
enhance
water
and
energy
conservat
ion
reduc
es
green
house
gas
emissi
on
Explicit
defination of
environmental
policy
Pearson
Correlat
ion
1 .468(**) .279 .336(*) .483(**) .235 .244 .090
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.002 .074 .029 .001 .134 .119 .573
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
clear objectives
and long term
Pearson
Correlat
.468(**) 1 .160 .652(**) .420(**) .409(*
*)
.717(**) .575(*
*)
environmental
plans
ion
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.002 .310 .000 .006 .007 .000 .000
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
sponsering of
environmental
events/collborati
on with
ecological
organization
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.279 .160 1 .104 .338(*) .113 .019 .045
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.074 .310 .511 .029 .477 .906 .777
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
risposable
disposal of waste
and residues
(separation and
prepration)
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.336(*) .652(**) .104 1 .284 .291 .640(**) .563(*
*)
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.029 .000 .511 .068 .062 .000 .000
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
acquisition of
clean
technology/equi
pment
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.483(**) .420(**) .338(*) .284 1 .329(*
)
.354(*) .149
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.001 .006 .029 .068 .033 .022 .346
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
emission filters
and end-of-pipe
control
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.235 .409(**) .113 .291 .329(*) 1 .269 .487(*
*)
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.134 .007 .477 .062 .033 .084 .001
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
enhance water
and energy
conservation
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.244 .717(**) .019 .640(**) .354(*) .269 1 .357(*
)
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.119 .000 .906 .000 .022 .084 .020
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
reduces green
house gas
emission
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.090 .575(**) .045 .563(**) .149 .487(*
*)
.357(*) 1
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.573 .000 .777 .000 .346 .001 .020
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).





8.EFFECT Of GREEN TECH. ON PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Correlations


acquisition of
clean
technology/equi
pment
emissi
on
filters
and
end-
of-
pipe
contr
ol
enhance
water
and
energy
conserva
tion
reduc
es
green
house
gas
emissi
on
substitutio
n of
polluting
an
hazardous
materials/
parts
design
focussed
on
reducing
resource
consump
tion and
waste
generati
on in
product
usage
design
for
dissemb
ly,
resusab
ility and
recylabi
lity
desigs
focused
on
reducing
resource
consump
tion and
waste
generati
on
during
producti
on and
distributi
on
green
procure
ment
acquisition of
clean
technology/equi
pment
Pearson
Correlat
ion
1 .329(*
)
.354(*) .149 .512(**) -.381(*) -.076 .090 .441(**)
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.033 .022 .346 .001 .013 .633 .569 .003
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
emission filters
and end-of-pipe
control
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.329(*) 1 .269 .487(*
*)
.058 .224 .190 .114 .266
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.033 .084 .001 .717 .155 .229 .474 .088
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
enhance water
and energy
conservation
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.354(*) .269 1 .357(*
)
.317(*) .013 .122 .274 .523(**)
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.022 .084 .020 .041 .933 .440 .079 .000
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
reduces green
house gas
emission
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.149 .487(*
*)
.357(*) 1 .347(*) .184 -.157 .262 .345(*)
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.346 .001 .020 .025 .243 .322 .094 .025
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
substitution of
polluting an
hazardous
materials/parts
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.512(**) .058 .317(*) .347(*
)
1 -.188 -.135 .290 .571(**)
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.001 .717 .041 .025 .233 .393 .063 .000
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
design focussed
on reducing
resource
consumption
and waste
generation in
product usage
Pearson
Correlat
ion
-.381(*) .224 .013 .184 -.188 1 .413(**) .617(**) .155
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.013 .155 .933 .243 .233 .007 .000 .327
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
design for
dissembly,
resusability and
Pearson
Correlat
ion
-.076 .190 .122 -.157 -.135 .413(**) 1 .262 .319(*)
recylability Sig. (2-
tailed)
.633 .229 .440 .322 .393 .007 .094 .040
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
desigs focused
on reducing
resource
consumption
and waste
generation
during
production and
distribution
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.090 .114 .274 .262 .290 .617(**) .262 1 .463(**)
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.569 .474 .079 .094 .063 .000 .094 .002
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
green
procurement
Pearson
Correlat
ion
.441(**) .266 .523(**) .345(*
)
.571(**) .155 .319(*) .463(**) 1
Sig. (2-
tailed)
.003 .088 .000 .025 .000 .327 .040 .002
N 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).


9. Influence of eco advertising & product development on customer preference

Correlations


environmental
arguments in
marketing
recyclable or
reusable
packaging or
container in
logistics
ecological
materials for
primary
packaging
green
packaging
preference for
green
products in
purchasing
environmental arguments
in marketing
Pearson Correlation
1 .142 .369(*) .268 -.017
Sig. (2-tailed)
.369 .016 .086 .916
N
42 42 42 42 42
recyclable or reusable
packaging or container in
logistics
Pearson Correlation
.142 1 .603(**) .711(**) .025
Sig. (2-tailed)
.369 .000 .000 .876
N
42 42 42 42 42
ecological materials for
primary packaging
Pearson Correlation
.369(*) .603(**) 1 .639(**) .062
Sig. (2-tailed)
.016 .000 .000 .694
N
42 42 42 42 42
green packaging Pearson Correlation
.268 .711(**) .639(**) 1 .152
Sig. (2-tailed)
.086 .000 .000 .337
N
42 42 42 42 42
preference for green
products in purchasing
Pearson Correlation
-.017 .025 .062 .152 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.916 .876 .694 .337
N
42 42 42 42 42
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).




10. the influence of policy in supplier selection (GSCM green supply chain mgt)

Correlations


Explicit
defination
of
environme
ntal policy
clear
objectives
and long
term
environme
ntal plans
sponsering
of
environme
ntal
events/coll
boration
with
ecological
organizatio
n
risposable
disposal
of waste
and
residues
(separatio
n and
prepration
)
environme
ntal criteria
in supplier
selection
shipments
consolidati
on
supplier
and NGO
cooperati
on in
carbon
labeling
Explicit defination of
environmental
policy
Pearson
Correlation
1 .468(**) .279 .336(*) .172 .034 -.280
Sig. (2-tailed)
.002 .074 .029 .275 .829 .073
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42
clear objectives and
long term
environmental
plans
Pearson
Correlation
.468(**) 1 .160 .652(**) .115 .042 -.149
Sig. (2-tailed)
.002 .310 .000 .467 .792 .346
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42
sponsering of
environmental
events/collboration
with ecological
organization
Pearson
Correlation
.279 .160 1 .104 -.043 -.051 .021
Sig. (2-tailed)
.074 .310 .511 .787 .750 .896
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42
risposable disposal
of waste and
residues
(separation and
prepration)
Pearson
Correlation
.336(*) .652(**) .104 1 -.130 -.061 -.044
Sig. (2-tailed)
.029 .000 .511 .412 .703 .781
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42
environmental
criteria in supplier
selection
Pearson
Correlation
.172 .115 -.043 -.130 1 .844(**) .298
Sig. (2-tailed)
.275 .467 .787 .412 .000 .056
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42
shipments
consolidation
Pearson
Correlation
.034 .042 -.051 -.061 .844(**) 1 .422(**)
Sig. (2-tailed)
.829 .792 .750 .703 .000 .005
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42
supplier and NGO
cooperation in
carbon labeling
Pearson
Correlation
-.280 -.149 .021 -.044 .298 .422(**) 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.073 .346 .896 .781 .056 .005
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).








11. management support leading to better eco product development
Correlations


well-
defined
environme
ntal
responsibi
lites
full-time
employee
s devoted
to
environme
ntal
managem
ent
natural
environme
nt training
programm
es for
managers
and
employee
s
adopts
green
human
resource
developm
ent
practices
substitutio
n of
polluting
an
hazardous
materials/
parts
design
focussed
on
reducing
resource
consumpti
on and
waste
generatio
n in
product
usage
desigs
focused
on
reducing
resource
consumpti
on and
waste
generatio
n during
production
and
distributio
n
design
for
dissembl
y,
resusabili
ty and
recylabilit
y
well-defined
environmental
responsibilites
Pearson
Correlation
1 -.145 -.010 .259 .081 .256 -.009 .101
Sig. (2-tailed)
.359 .948 .098 .608 .102 .957 .526
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
full-time
employees
devoted to
environmental
management
Pearson
Correlation
-.145 1 .801(**) -.104 -.012 -.081 -.037 -.187
Sig. (2-tailed)
.359 .000 .512 .941 .611 .818 .237
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
natural
environment
training
programmes for
managers and
employees
Pearson
Correlation
-.010 .801(**) 1 -.111 .125 -.120 .010 -.269
Sig. (2-tailed)
.948 .000 .483 .431 .450 .950 .085
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
adopts green
human resource
development
practices
Pearson
Correlation
.259 -.104 -.111 1 .348(*) .253 .440(**) .189
Sig. (2-tailed)
.098 .512 .483 .024 .106 .004 .231
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
substitution of
polluting an
hazardous
materials/parts
Pearson
Correlation
.081 -.012 .125 .348(*) 1 -.188 .290 -.135
Sig. (2-tailed)
.608 .941 .431 .024 .233 .063 .393
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
design focussed
on reducing
resource
consumption and
waste generation
in product usage
Pearson
Correlation
.256 -.081 -.120 .253 -.188 1 .617(**) .413(**)
Sig. (2-tailed)
.102 .611 .450 .106 .233 .000 .007
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
desigs focused on
reducing resource
consumption and
waste generation
during production
and distribution
Pearson
Correlation
-.009 -.037 .010 .440(**) .290 .617(**) 1 .262
Sig. (2-tailed)
.957 .818 .950 .004 .063 .000 .094
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
design for
dissembly,
resusability and
recylability
Pearson
Correlation
.101 -.187 -.269 .189 -.135 .413(**) .262 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.526 .237 .085 .231 .393 .007 .094
N
42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Regression

1.EFFECT OF GREEN TECHNOLOGY, POLICIES AND ECO ADVERTISING ON CUSTOMER
PREFERENCE
Variables Entered/Removed(b)

Model
Variables
Entered
Variables
Removed Method
1
enhance
water and
energy
conservatio
n,
environment
al
arguments
in
marketing,
Explicit
defination of
environment
al policy,
emission
filters and
end-of-pipe
control,
acquisition
of clean
technology/
equipment,
reduces
green
house gas
emission,
green
packaging,
clear
objectives
and long
term
environment
al plans(a)
. Enter
a All requested variables entered.
b Dependent Variable: preference for green products in purchasing

Model Summary

Model R R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
1
.742(a) .551 .442 1.080
a Predictors: (Constant), enhance water and energy conservation, environmental arguments in marketing, Explicit defination of
environmental policy, emission filters and end-of-pipe control, acquisition of clean technology/equipment, reduces green house gas
emission, green packaging, clear objectives and long term environmental plans

ANOVA(b)

Model
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression
47.136 8 5.892 5.052 .000(a)
Residual
38.484 33 1.166
Total
85.619 41
a Predictors: (Constant), enhance water and energy conservation, environmental arguments in marketing, Explicit defination of
environmental policy, emission filters and end-of-pipe control, acquisition of clean technology/equipment, reduces green house gas
emission, green packaging, clear objectives and long term environmental plans
b Dependent Variable: preference for green products in purchasing

Coefficients(a)

Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig. B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant)
-.659 1.025 -.643 .525
Explicit defination of
environmental policy
.515 .254 .304 2.026 .051
clear objectives and long
term environmental plans
.781 .309 .604 2.528 .016
environmental arguments
in marketing
.063 .146 .063 .430 .670
green packaging
-.871 .300 -.574 -2.905 .007
acquisition of clean
technology/equipment
-.172 .242 -.112 -.710 .483
reduces green house gas
emission
-.133 .182 -.132 -.734 .468
emission filters and end-of-
pipe control
-.044 .173 -.037 -.256 .800
enhance water and energy
conservation
.687 .280 .455 2.456 .019
a Dependent Variable: preference for green products in purchasing


2. Effect Of Policies and Management Support On Eco Advertising

Variables Entered/Removed(b)

Model
Variables
Entered
Variables
Removed Method
1
full-time
employees
devoted to
environment
al
manageme
nt, Explicit
defination of
environment
al policy,
well-defined
environment
al
responsibilit
es, clear
objectives
and long
term
environment
al plans(a)
. Enter
a All requested variables entered.
b Dependent Variable: environmental arguments in marketing

Model Summary

Model R R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
1
.332(a) .110 .014 1.435
a Predictors: (Constant), full-time employees devoted to environmental management, Explicit defination of environmental policy, well-
defined environmental responsibilites, clear objectives and long term environmental plans

ANOVA(b)

Model
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression
9.455 4 2.364 1.148 .349(a)
Residual
76.188 37 2.059
Total
85.643 41
a Predictors: (Constant), full-time employees devoted to environmental management, Explicit defination of environmental policy, well-
defined environmental responsibilites, clear objectives and long term environmental plans
b Dependent Variable: environmental arguments in marketing









Coefficients(a)

Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig. B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant)
-.258 1.336 -.193 .848
Explicit defination of
environmental policy
.335 .309 .198 1.084 .285
clear objectives and long
term environmental plans
-.197 .313 -.153 -.631 .532
well-defined environmental
responsibilites
.459 .286 .342 1.604 .117
full-time employees
devoted to environmental
management
.124 .151 .143 .823 .416
a Dependent Variable: environmental arguments in marketing


3. EFFECT OF POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ON GMP CONTROL PROCEDURE

Variables Entered/Removed(b)

Model
Variables
Entered
Variables
Removed Method
1
full-time
employees
devoted to
environment
al
manageme
nt, Explicit
defination of
environment
al policy,
well-defined
environment
al
responsibilit
es, clear
objectives
and long
term
environment
al plans(a)
. Enter
a All requested variables entered.
b Dependent Variable: periodic elaboration of environmental reports



Model Summary

Model R R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
1
.681(a) .464 .406 .867
a Predictors: (Constant), full-time employees devoted to environmental management, Explicit defination of environmental policy, well-
defined environmental responsibilites, clear objectives and long term environmental plans

ANOVA(b)

Model
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression
24.083 4 6.021 8.007 .000(a)
Residual
27.822 37 .752
Total
51.905 41
a Predictors: (Constant), full-time employees devoted to environmental management, Explicit defination of environmental policy, well-
defined environmental responsibilites, clear objectives and long term environmental plans
b Dependent Variable: periodic elaboration of environmental reports

Coefficients(a)

Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig. B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant)
.514 .808 .637 .528
Explicit defination of
environmental policy
-.083 .187 -.063 -.443 .660
clear objectives and long
term environmental plans
-.024 .189 -.024 -.126 .900
well-defined environmental
responsibilites
.173 .173 .165 .999 .324
full-time employees
devoted to environmental
management
.463 .091 .686 5.076 .000
a Dependent Variable: periodic elaboration of environmental reports


4.EFFECT OF POLICIES ON TRANSPORTATION

Variables Entered/Removed(b)

Model
Variables
Entered
Variables
Removed Method
1
clear
objectives
and long
term
environment
al plans,
Explicit
defination of
environment
al policy(a)
. Enter
a All requested variables entered.
b Dependent Variable: selection of cleaner transportation methods

Model Summary

Model R R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
1
.426(a) .181 .139 .865
a Predictors: (Constant), clear objectives and long term environmental plans, Explicit defination of environmental policy

ANOVA(b)

Model
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression
6.458 2 3.229 4.319 .020(a)
Residual
29.161 39 .748
Total
35.619 41
a Predictors: (Constant), clear objectives and long term environmental plans, Explicit defination of environmental policy
b Dependent Variable: selection of cleaner transportation methods

Coefficients(a)

Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig. B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant)
3.549 .681 5.210 .000
Explicit defination of
environmental policy
-.354 .179 -.325 -1.980 .055
clear objectives and long
term environmental plans
.389 .137 .466 2.845 .007
a Dependent Variable: selection of cleaner transportation methods





5. EFFECT OF POLICIES AND MGT SUPPORT ON GMP CONTROL PROCEDURE

Variables Entered/Removed(b)

Model
Variables
Entered
Variables
Removed Method
1
full-time
employees
devoted to
environment
al
manageme
nt, Explicit
defination of
environment
al policy,
well-defined
environment
al
responsibilit
es(a)
. Enter
a All requested variables entered.
b Dependent Variable: systems for measuring and assessing environmental performance


Model Summary

Model R R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
1
.333(a) .111 .041 1.013
a Predictors: (Constant), full-time employees devoted to environmental management, Explicit defination of environmental policy, well-
defined environmental responsibilites

ANOVA(b)

Model
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression
4.875 3 1.625 1.582 .210(a)
Residual
39.029 38 1.027
Total
43.905 41
a Predictors: (Constant), full-time employees devoted to environmental management, Explicit defination of environmental policy, well-
defined environmental responsibilites
b Dependent Variable: systems for measuring and assessing environmental performance













Coefficients(a)

Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig. B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant)
3.077 .934 3.295 .002
Explicit defination of
environmental policy
.022 .191 .018 .117 .907
well-defined environmental
responsibilites
-.265 .152 -.276 -1.742 .090
full-time employees
devoted to environmental
management
.098 .096 .157 1.016 .316
a Dependent Variable: systems for measuring and assessing environmental performance


6. Regression

Variables Entered/Removed(b)

Model
Variables
Entered
Variables
Removed Method
1
green
packaging,
environment
al
arguments
in
marketing,
ecological
materials for
primary
packaging,
recyclable
or reusable
packaging
or container
in
logistics(a)
. Enter
a All requested variables entered.
b Dependent Variable: preference for green products in purchasing


Model Summary

Model R R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
1
.205(a) .042 -.062 1.489
a Predictors: (Constant), green packaging, environmental arguments in marketing, ecological materials for primary packaging,
recyclable or reusable packaging or container in logistics


ANOVA(b)

Model
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression
3.583 4 .896 .404 .805(a)
Residual
82.036 37 2.217
Total
85.619 41
a Predictors: (Constant), green packaging, environmental arguments in marketing, ecological materials for primary packaging,
recyclable or reusable packaging or container in logistics
b Dependent Variable: preference for green products in purchasing



Coefficients(a)

Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig. B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant)
2.424 1.011 2.397 .022
environmental arguments
in marketing
-.074 .175 -.074 -.420 .677
recyclable or reusable
packaging or container in
logistics
-.250 .337 -.179 -.742 .463
ecological materials for
primary packaging
.012 .251 .011 .049 .961
green packaging
.443 .378 .292 1.174 .248
a Dependent Variable: preference for green products in purchasing