Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
V
i
=
L
i
,
(1)
with T as the temperature, p as the pressure, and
i
as the chemical potential of species i. In contrast
to cubic equations of state, the BWR equation of state has been shown to accurately predict saturated
liquid properties (e.g., density) over the widest range of pressures and temperatures. Therefore,
accurate vapor-liquid equilibrium conditions can be computed, particularly at pressures above the
critical pressure of the liquid phase as performed here, when solubility effects have to be considered.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
129.2.129.146 On: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:52:34
092103-6 R. N. Dahms and J. C. Oefelein Phys. Fluids 25, 092103 (2013)
C. Linear Gradient Theory for gas-liquid interface structures
Gradient theory provides a widely accepted methodology to calculate detailed interface struc-
tures between gases and liquids.
3640
The foundation of this theory was established by van der
Waals
38, 39
in 1893 and reformulated later by Cahn and Hilliard
40
in 1958. It provides a thermo-
mechanical model of continuous uid media that converts statistical mechanics of inhomogeneous
uids into a nonlinear boundary value problem. At equilibrium (as applied in this paper), the model
has been shown in detail to be equivalent to mean-eld molecular theories of capillarity and it has
been successfully applied to a wide variety of uids: e.g., hydrocarbons and their mixtures, polar
compounds and their mixtures, polymer and polymer melts, vapor-liquid and liquid-liquid inter-
faces. Most recently, Gradient Theory has been successfully compared to Monte Carlo simulations
of vapor-liquid and liquid-liquid interfaces.
4143
The theory proved successful in capturing both
surface tension and details of vapor-liquid interfacial structures.
To simplify the calculations without loss of validity, we employ LGT. LGT is derived from
Gradient Theory by assuming a linearized minimization function of the Helmholtz free energy
density distribution across the vapor-liquid interface for the calculation of the interfacial density
proles. It has proven successful for calculating binary and multicomponent interface states of the
kind considered here.
57, 58
The Helmholtz free energy density for a mixture is expanded as a Taylor
series and truncated at lower spatial derivatives of density
F =
_
_
_
f
0
(
M
) +
i, j
1
2
i j
M,i
M, j
_
_
ds (2)
with F dened as the Helmholtz free energy, f
0
() the Helmholtz free energy density of a ho-
mogeneous uid,
M
the molar density, and s the volume unit. The inuence parameter of the
inhomogeneous uid is denoted and carries the molecular structure information of the interface.
This in turn determines the density gradients response to local deviations of the chemical potentials
from their bulk value. The interfacial prole of a planar multicomponent gas-liquid interface in
equilibrium is then obtained by assuming the inuence parameter to be density-independent
59
and
by minimizing the Helmholtz free energy according to the equation
36, 37
j
1
2
i j
d
M,i
dz
d
M, j
dz
= (
M
)
s
(3)
with z as the normal interface direction and
s
= p
s
as the equilibrium pressure. The grand
thermodynamic potential energy density is dened as
(
M
) = f
0
(
M
)
M,i
i,B
(4)
with
i, B
as the chemical potential of species i in the bulk phase. According to Gradient Theory, the
surface tension is calculated as
=
i j
d
M,i
dz
d
M, j
dz
dz. (5)
To avoid solving a boundary value problem on the innite interval, the equations are transformed
from spatial to density coordinates using a reference component that is assumed to be a monotonic
function across the interface. The transformation rules are as follows:
d
i
dz
=
d
i
d
d
dz
,
d
2
i
dz
2
=
d
_
d
i
d
_
d
d
dz
d
dz
+
d
i
d
d
_
d
dz
_
d
d
dz
.
(6)
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
129.2.129.146 On: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:52:34
092103-7 R. N. Dahms and J. C. Oefelein Phys. Fluids 25, 092103 (2013)
The surface tension and spatial interface dimension z can then be calculated once the species density
proles within the interface are known
=
I,L
_
I,V
_2 ( (
M
)
s
)
i j
d
i
d
I
d
j
d
I
d
I
(7)
and
z = z
0
+
I
_
I,0
i j
d
i
d
I
d
j
d
I
2 ( (
M
)
s
)
d
I
(8)
with subscripts I as the reference component. The cross inuence parameter
ij
is obtained as
i j
= (1
i j
)
j
(9)
with
ij
as the binary interaction parameter set to zero
3234
resulting in the geometric mean
i j
= 0. (10)
The inuence parameter
i
of pure species i is calculated following Lin et al.
36
ln
_
i
a
i
b
2/3
i
N
8/3
A
_
= c
0,i
+c
1,i
ln(t
R
) +c
2,i
[ln(t
R
)]
2
(11)
with c
0
, c
1
, c
2
dened as the pure species correlation coefcients, t
R
= 1 T/T
c
as a reduced
temperature function, N
A
as the Avogadro constant, and a and b as coefcients dependent on the
species critical temperature, critical pressure, and acentric factor, respectively.
The boundary conditions of the bulk vapor and liquid phases, referred to by indices V and L in
Eq. (7), are obtained from real-uid multicomponent vapor-liquid equilibrium calculations. Then,
the characteristic interface thickness
VLE
is calculated following the criterion from Lekner and
Henderson
60
VLE
=
0.9
_
0.1
i j
d
i
d
I
d
j
d
I
2
_
f
0
(
M
)
M,i
i
s
_ d. (12)
In Gradient Theory, the species density proles are obtained in relation to the chosen reference
species density using nonlinear equations. In Linear Gradient Theory, however, a linear relationship
between the reference and the species component is assumed as follows:
d
i
d
I
=
i,L
i,V
I,L
I,V
. (13)
Because of the small length scales associated with vapor-liquid interface structures, the one-
dimensional approximation applied in Gradient Theory is valid during transient liquid injections
up to the time of the breakdown of the interface. This period represents the critical time in the
understanding and quantifying the transition between classical two-phase phenomena and dense-
uid jet dynamics. The interface length scale is orders of magnitude smaller than the Kolmogorov
scale. Therefore, interactions between the interface and three-dimensional turbulent ow eld are
negligible. In addition, the curvature of the local interface is assumed to have only a minor inu-
ence on the interface structure and surface tension. This conclusion is supported by a negligible
pressure difference across the vapor-liquid interface and the small length scale ratio associated with
interface thickness and ow induced curvature. After the time of the breakdown of the vapor-liquid
interface, however, the interface substantially grows in thickness and develops into a turbulent
mixing layer. Then, a multidimensional model becomes necessary to appropriately describe the
diffusion-dominated gas-liquid mixing dynamics.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
129.2.129.146 On: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:52:34
092103-8 R. N. Dahms and J. C. Oefelein Phys. Fluids 25, 092103 (2013)
FIG. 2. Density contours of pure n-dodecane showing the saturation line, critical point (T
c
658.1 K, p
c
18.17 bar), and
key thermodynamic regimes.
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
To establish the theory for the transition between two-phase and single-phase interface dynam-
ics, we present a comprehensive thermodynamic analysis using representative multicomponent uid
mixtures and conditions. Both single-phase mixing and two-phase interface processes are investi-
gated to understand and quantify at what conditions transition occurs. To achieve this goal, real-uid
vapor-liquid equilibrium conditions are calculated and then combined with LGT to reconstruct the
molecular vapor-liquid interface structure for a wide range of pressures and temperatures. The real-
uid calculations then provide a framework to quantify the precise state of the interface as a function
of specic injection conditions (i.e., pressure, local mixture composition, and temperature). Building
on this analysis, a regime diagram is introduced that quanties the conditions under which classical
sprays transition to dense-uid jets. To illustrate, we use n-dodecane and nitrogen as a representative
liquid-fuel and ambient gas. To provide a baseline pure-uid reference, Fig. 2 presents the density
contours of pure n-dodecane in a pressure-temperature diagram. These data were computed using
the BWR equation of state described in Sec. II A. The diagram shows the saturation line, which
separates the liquid and vapor states. Key thermodynamic regimes are then dened accordingly. The
compressed liquid regime is dened as being supercritical with respect to pressure and subcritical
with respect to temperature. The ideal gas regime is found in regions of supercritical temperature but
subcritical pressure. The supercritical state is then dened for a uid at both supercritical tempera-
ture and pressure. Using the equation of state and corresponding mixing rules, other thermodynamic
properties for mixtures such as the compressibility factor, enthalpy, entropy, heat capacities, and
fugacity coefcients can be obtained in a similar manner. This methodology is used to calculate
vapor-liquid equilibrium conditions as follows.
Figure 3 presents typical vapor and liquid equilibrium compositions for a binary system con-
taining n-dodecane and nitrogen at different operating pressures. The calculations show that the
critical mixing temperature, above which vapor-liquid equilibrium cannot exist anymore, decreases
with increasing pressure due to an increase of dissolved nitrogen into the liquid phase. Figure 4
shows that this decrease in critical mixing temperature scales linearly with pressure. Similarly,
the mole fraction of n-dodecane (denoted X
C12
) at the critical condition decreases asymptotically
with pressure. The combination of the equation of state with vapor-liquid equilibrium calculations
provide the compositions and mixture states of the respective vapor and liquid phases at given tem-
perature and pressure conditions. However, such calculations do not provide information about the
spatial distribution of these compositions across the interface, the structure and size of the interfacial
region, or the value of surface tension within. Without this information, no conclusions can be drawn
regarding the nature of the transitional processes of interest.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
129.2.129.146 On: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:52:34
092103-9 R. N. Dahms and J. C. Oefelein Phys. Fluids 25, 092103 (2013)
FIG. 3. Vapor-liquid equilibrium conditions for a binary system of n-dodecane and nitrogen at different pressures as a
function of the mixture fraction. Note that the critical mixing temperature decreases with increasing pressure.
To understand the nature of the interface dynamics, LGT presented in Sec. II C is applied using
the equilibrium phase states as the boundary conditions while assuming a constant temperature
distribution across the interface. The accuracy of the method is demonstrated for systems similar
to those considered here in Fig. 5. This gure presents calculations of surface tension for a binary
iso-octanenitrogen system as a function of pressure and at a constant interface temperature of
T =313 K. It is shown that the computed values agree well with measured values.
61
This agreement
between experiments and calculations is representative to that made by other authors.
57, 58
Respective
values of surface tension for a n-dodecanenitrogen system at the same pressures and temperature
are also shown for comparison. These results show that surface tension forces do decrease with
increasing pressure. However, the results also highlight a major point. In contrast to pure uids, the
value of surface tension forces in multicomponent mixtures does not diminish simply because the
critical pressure of the liquid phase or the critical mixing pressure, as dened by Faeth et al.
30, 31
to be 2-3 times the critical pressure of the hydrocarbon, is exceeded.
In Fig. 6, LGT is applied to reconstruct the density proles of n-dodecane and nitrogen mixtures
across their vapor-liquid interface for different conditions. The calculations show that vapor-liquid
equilibrium conditions are only required to be fullled across a very thin molecular layer. Based
on this analysis, it is justied to use the equilibrium vapor pressure as a boundary condition in
conventional multiphase theory even during the injection transient. This conclusion is consistent
with earlier results presented by Bellan and Summereld.
6264
Outside of these thin layers, the
temperature of the liquid quickly approaches the fuel injection temperature in the liquid core while
the gaseous conditions approach the ambient mixture state. Figure 6 (left) presents mixture density
FIG. 4. Saturation temperature of the liquid and critical mixing temperature and composition resulting from vapor-liquid
equilibrium calculations as a function of pressure for a n-dodecanenitrogen system.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
129.2.129.146 On: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:52:34
092103-10 R. N. Dahms and J. C. Oefelein Phys. Fluids 25, 092103 (2013)
FIG. 5. Comparison of measured and calculated values of surface tension for a binary iso-octanenitrogen mixture as a
function of pressure, at a constant temperature of T = 313 K. For comparison, respective values for a n-dodecanenitrogen
system are also shown.
proles across the vapor-liquid interface at T = 450 K and for two different pressures: p = 30 bar
and p = 60 bar, respectively. The interfacial structure broadens with increasing pressure. Similarly,
the density of the vapor increases, while pressure has only a minor effect on the density of the liquid.
The same trend is observed in Fig. 6 (right), but the prole variations caused by a change in pressure
have broadened due to the elevated interface temperature.
The effect of temperature on the interface is studied in more detail in Fig. 7. The left plot
presents mixture density proles at a constant pressure of p = 60 bar and variations in temperature.
The interfacial prole is shown to broaden substantially with increasing temperature. This effect is
quantied in the right plot by calculating representative interface thicknesses using Eq. (12). The
analysis shows that the interface thickness increases exponentially with temperature.
Having established a framework that computes the detailed vapor-liquid equilibrium interface
structures, we now add physical complexity to analyze the non-equilibrium problem of gases and
liquids interacting at different temperatures. We calculate a set of representative mixing lines in
mixture fraction space. The goal is to obtain the relationship between temperature and mixture
fraction for different mixtures of ambient gas and vapor. Here, the enthalpy of vaporization is
included assuming adiabatic mixing using an enthalpy distribution that is linear in mixture fraction.
The adiabatic mixing assumption is supported by earlier works from Siebers,
21, 22
who presented (a)
a mass and energy balance analysis for diesel injection that results in vapor temperatures consistent
FIG. 6. Sensitivity of the vapor-liquid interfacial structure to variations in pressure and temperature. Two different pressures
(p =30 bars and p =60 bars) are investigated at interface temperatures of T =450 K(left) and T =550 K(right), respectively.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
129.2.129.146 On: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:52:34
092103-11 R. N. Dahms and J. C. Oefelein Phys. Fluids 25, 092103 (2013)
FIG. 7. Sensitivity of the vapor-liquid interfacial structure to variations in temperature at a constant pressure of p = 60 bar.
The interface broadens substantially with an increase in temperature (left). Representative interface thicknesses are calculated
using Eq. (12) and are shown to increase exponentially with temperature (right).
with the adiabatic mixing assumption and (b) developed a scaling law based on this assumption for
single-component liquid-phase fuel penetration. Results demonstrated a close agreement with liquid
length data obtained from Mie-scattered light imaging. Furthermore, Dec et al.
6567
and Pickett
et al.
68, 69
presented Rayleigh scattering temperature and equivalence ratio measurements in the
gaseous phase of diesel fuel injections. The measurements were consistent with both the predicted
vapor temperatures and the assumptions being made using a linear enthalpy distribution in mixture
fraction space.
Using the assumptions above, the BWR equation of state is applied to calculate the temperature
for each composition determined by the mixture fraction in order to match this prescribed linear
enthalpy distribution. To illustrate, Fig. 8 shows the resulting enthalpy and constant pressure heat
capacity at conditions similar to the Spray A nonreactive case dened as part of the Sandia
National Laboratories Engine Combustion Network (see www.sandia.gov/ECN).
69, 70
N-dodecane
is injected at a temperature T
F
= 363 K into nitrogen at a temperature T
A
= 900 K and a chamber
pressure p = 60 bar. The corresponding mixing temperatures are then given in Fig. 9, where we
show n-dodecane injected at a constant temperature T
F
= 363 K into nitrogen at (a) T
A
= 450 K
and p = 30 bar and (b) T
A
= 900 K and p = 60 bar, respectively.
Superimposing the two mixing lines shown in Fig. 9 onto the corresponding vapor-liquid
equilibrium curves now poses a potentially interesting dilemma. As shown in Fig. 10, the two
different chamber pressures dene the envelope of temperature and mixture conditions where vapor-
liquid equilibrium is possible. Likewise, the adiabatic mixing temperatures dene the envelope of
conditions under which a vapor state is possible. The representative interface state for both cases
is found at the intersection points T
1
and T
2
between adiabatic mixing and vapor equilibrium state.
FIG. 8. Enthalpy and constant pressure heat capacity as a function of mixture fraction for n-dodecane injected as a liquid at
T
F
= 363 K into gaseous N
2
at T
A
= 900 K and p = 60 bars.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
129.2.129.146 On: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:52:34
092103-12 R. N. Dahms and J. C. Oefelein Phys. Fluids 25, 092103 (2013)
FIG. 9. Adiabatic mixing temperature distributions for n-dodecane injected at T
F
= 363 K into nitrogen at (a) T
A
= 450 K
and p = 30 bar and (b) T
A
= 900 K and p = 60 bar, respectively.
Interestingly, the analysis shows that the enthalpy of the mixture is not sufcient to heat the liquid
to its critical value. The mixing line required to actually obtain such critical conditions is also
shown in Fig. 10, which illustrates its nonphysical nature. These results suggest that, for many high-
temperature and high-pressure conditions, a distinct two-phase interface should exist. However, this
appears to be in conict with experimental evidence of vanishing interfaces at some supercritical
pressure conditions.
13
To better understand the implications of Fig. 10, our next goal is to reconstruct the details of the
interface itself using LGT. To apply LGT, we must apply appropriate boundary conditions for the
liquid and vapor phases on either side of the interface. Here, we assume that the temperature
across the interface is constant and can be represented by the intersection points T
1
and T
2
in
Fig. 10. Assuming that the pressure at the interface is equal to the chamber pressure, we dene
the two different chamber conditions as the high-temperature interface and low-temperature
interface states, respectively. Variations of the interface condition as a function of chamber pressure
are then investigated.
Figure 11 presents the reduced interface temperature for different chamber pressures. The
reduced interface temperature is dened as the actual temperature of the interface T normalized
FIG. 10. Superimposition of the adiabatic mixing lines shown in Fig. 9 onto the corresponding vapor-liquid equilibrium
curves showing intersection points T
1
and T
2
between adiabatic mixing and vapor equilibrium state temperatures.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
129.2.129.146 On: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:52:34
092103-13 R. N. Dahms and J. C. Oefelein Phys. Fluids 25, 092103 (2013)
FIG. 11. Variations of reduced interface temperatures as a function of chamber pressure and temperature.
by its critical temperature T
c
. Previously, T
c
has been shown to decrease linearly with pressure,
as shown in Fig. 4. The analysis here shows that higher chamber pressures lead to higher reduced
interface temperatures. This pressure effect increases at higher ambient gas temperatures.
In addition to boundary conditions, it is necessary to quantify the thickness of the interface
relative to the continuum approximation. The reasons for this will become apparent in what follows.
Figure 12 shows the variation of the molecular mean free path at the interface with increasing
pressure. The molecular mean free path, denoted as , is evaluated using the vapor state composition
x
and by assuming the validity of the ideal gas law in the derivation of the number of molecules per
unit volume as follows:
|x
=
k
B
T
2pd
2
(14)
with k
B
dened as the Boltzmann constant, T the interface temperature, p the bulk pressure, and d
the hard sphere diameter of the average molecule. The average size of a molecule is calculated as
d =
i
X
i
d
i
(15)
with X
i
as the species mole fractions (as provided by the vapor equilibrium composition) and d
i
as
the respective molecular size of each species in the system. This gure shows that the vapor state
shifts toward leaner mixtures with increasing pressure and constant ambient temperature. Thus, the
average molecule size d decreases due to a reduced concentration of large-size fuel components in
the vapor. This pressure effect increases at higher ambient gas temperatures. Furthermore, it was
previously shown that higher pressures also lead to higher interface temperatures, compare Fig. 11.
FIG. 12. Variation of the molecular mean free path at the interface, evaluated for the vapor equilibrium state presented in
Fig. 10, as a function of chamber pressure.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
129.2.129.146 On: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:52:34
092103-14 R. N. Dahms and J. C. Oefelein Phys. Fluids 25, 092103 (2013)
FIG. 13. Interfacial density proles and thicknesses for the low-temperature (left) and high-temperature (right) interface
states, as calculated using Linear Gradient Theory. Corresponding mean free paths are shown for reference. Interestingly,
the Knudsen-number criterion indicates that the high-temperature interface falls within the uid mechanic continuum regime
(Kn <0.1) whereas a classical molecular interface is exhibited by the low-temperature interface. Notice that Gradient Theory
is fully valid to calculate the physical mean density prole of molecular vapor-liquid interfaces.
Both of these pressure effects increase the mean free path. However, as shown in Fig. 12, they cannot
compensate for the dominating direct effect of pressure prescribed by Eq. (14). Thus, the molecular
mean free path is substantially shorter in the high-temperature interface than in the corresponding
low-temperature interface.
With the analysis above in place, we can now focus on the interfacial structure of our test
cases using LGT. Figure 13 shows the calculated results. At the high-temperature condition, the
interface shows substantially reduced values of density differences between vapor and liquid states
and is distinctively thicker than at the corresponding low-temperature condition. The relevance
of this thickness is highlighted by comparing it to the molecular mean free path, also shown in
Fig. 13. Fluid particles equilibrate over distances comparable to the molecular length scales. Since
the mean free path at the low-temperature interface is larger than the interface thickness, its interfa-
cial processes are governed by molecular dynamics and the temperature of the vapor T
V
equilibrates
with the temperature of the liquid T
L
to the value of the interface temperature obtained from Fig. 10
(T
2
=T
V
=T
L
). This justies the vapor-liquid equilibrium assumptions. The low-temperature inter-
face exhibits surface tension forces, supports evaporation and latent heat of vaporization phenomena,
and is therefore expected to lead to the classical spray phenomena as suggested by two-phase the-
ory. The situation for the high-temperature interface, however, is reversed. The mean free path has
become more than an order of magnitude shorter than the interface thickness. For this situation,
vapor-liquid interfacial processes are not governed by molecular dynamics anymore. The interface
enters the continuum regime and thus the heat ux across the interface becomes Fickian in nature.
Since the ambient gas temperature is substantially higher than the liquid temperature, the tempera-
ture equilibriumassumption between vapor and liquid (Eq. (1)) at the interface temperature obtained
from Fig. 10 also breaks down (T
1
= T
V
= T
L
). Vapor-liquid equilibrium assumptions and classi-
cal two-phase theory do not apply. Then, the thermodynamic value of surface tension forces (i.e.,
5.5 mN/m for the example here) diminishes as the thickness of this interface substantially
increases.
The two distinctively different interfacial conditions shown in Fig. 13 can be classied using
the Knudsen-number criterion
Kn =
= x
; where x
is the vapor
composition) is fullled at the critical point of the multicomponent system. The thermodynamic
regimes of liquid, compressed liquid, vapor, ideal gas, and supercritical uid are then dened in a
manner analogous to the pure uid denition in Fig. 2.
Figure 17 shows both the critical temperature and critical pressure of the mixture for each
mixture state in Z. These properties have been processed directly from the equation of state using
the criteria
_
p
_
T
T
C
,
C
=
_
2
p
2
_
T
T
C
,
C
= 0. (17)
The critical temperature and pressure for pure n-dodecane and nitrogen are then found at mixture
fraction Z = 1 and Z = 0, respectively. For mixture fractions below Z < Z
0.79 since the mixture is supercritical at these conditions. At lower pressures, a discrete
molecular interface must exist and diffusion-controlled mixing cannot occur.
The distribution of the adiabatic mixing temperature, and therefore the value of Z
, depends on
the chamber pressure. Figure 18 shows the supercritical mixture pressure as a function of ambient
gas temperature for a set of representative liquid fuel injection temperatures. This quantity decreases
with an increase in both liquid fuel injection and ambient gas temperatures. The high-temperature
case used previously (T
A
= 900 K, T
F
= 363 K) is also highlighted. The analysis shows that the
chamber pressure of p = 60 bar exceeds the supercritical mixture pressure (here p
c,m
= 29.6 bar),
which facilitates a diffusion-controlled mixing pathway. Using these data, the thermodynamic regime
diagram shown in Fig. 19 was constructed to analyze the envelope of mixture states associated with
the high-temperature case. The reduced critical pressure of the mixture is dened as the cham-
ber pressure normalized by the critical pressure of the mixture p
c
(Z) shown in Fig. 17. Super-
critical pressures of the mixture are then dened as p
Chamber
/p
c
(Z) > 1.0. Similarly, supercritical
FIG. 17. Adiabatic mixing temperature superimposed with the corresponding critical temperature and pressure of the mixture
for a n-dodecanenitrogen system. For mixture fractions below Z < Z