0.

00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
A
v
e
r
a
g
e

o
f

S
U
R
F

s
c
o
r
e
s
Year
SURF - Students' Unit Reflective Feedback on OENA8554 Subsea Technology Unit
Unit
School
Faculty
UWA
Based on the standard questions:
Q1. It was clear what I was expected to learn in this unit
Q2. The assessment requirements were clearly stated
Q3. The assessment tasks were closely linked to the unit objectives
Q4. The unit was well organised
Q5. The learning resources (handouts, text, web resources, etc) were
adequate for my study in the unit
Q6. Overall, this unit was a good educational experience
Scored on Strongly Disagree=1, Disagree=2, Agree=3 and Strongly Agree=4.
The mid-point of this scale is a rating of 2.5.
O
n
l
y
4

e
n
r
o
l
m
e
n
t
s


i
n


2
0
0
8

-
S
U
R
F


s
c
o
r
e
s


n
o
t


g
i
v
e
n
tudents' nit eflective eedback


Unit title: Subsea Technology Unit code: OENA8554 Faculty: Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
Campus: Crawley Teaching period: SEM-2 2013 School: Mechanical Engineering
Start Date: 29/07/2013 End Date: 23/11/2013
Number of unit enrolments: 50 Number of Surf evaluations: 22
***
Response rate: 44%
**
Percentage of Responses Average Responses*
Question

Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Agree
Strongly
Agree

Unit School Faculty UWA
Q1. It was clear what I was expected to learn in this unit

0 0 27 73

3.7 3.1 3.0 3.1
Q2. The assessment requirements were clearly stated

0 0 23 77

3.8 3.1 3.1 3.2
Q3. The assessment tasks were closely linked to the unit objectives

0 0 18 82

3.8 3.2 3.2 3.2
Q4. The unit was well organised

0 9 32 59

3.5 3.0 3.0 3.1
Q5. The learning resources (handouts, text, web resources, etc) were adequate for
my study in the unit

5 0 9 86

3.8 3.0 3.0 3.1
Q6. Overall, this unit was a good educational experience

0 5 18 77

3.7 3.2 3.0 3.2
* The average of responses after quantifying them as follows: Strongly Disagree=1, Disagree=2, Agree=3 and Strongly Agree=4. The mid-point of this scale is a rating of 2.5.
** If the number of evaluations is greater than the number of enrolments, there was an anomaly in the administration of SURF and the results may not be reliable.
*** To protect student anonymity, where there are fewer than 6 evaluations, results for the unit are not shown.
Surf online - Statistics https://www.surf.uwa.edu.au/SurfStats.aspx
1 of 1 4/03/2014 3:28 PM
Students' Unit Reflective Feedback


Unit title: Subsea Technology Unit code: OENA8554 Faculty: Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
Campus: Crawley Teaching period: SEM-2 2012 School: Mechanical Engineering
Start Date: 30/07/2012 End Date: 24/11/2012
Number of unit enrolments: 45 Number of Surf evaluations: 27
***
Response rate: 60%
**

Percentage of Responses Average Responses*
Question
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Agree
Strongly
Agree
Unit School Faculty UWA
Q1. It was clear what I was expected to learn in this unit 4 4 52 41 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.1
Q2. The assessment requirements were clearly stated 4 4 44 48 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.1
Q3. The assessment tasks were closely linked to the unit objectives 4 4 37 56 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.2
Q4. The unit was well organised 4 7 52 37 3.2 3.0 2.9 3.1
Q5. The learning resources (handouts, text, web resources, etc) were
adequate for my study in the unit
4 8 38 50 3.3 3.0 2.9 3.0
Q6. Overall, this unit was a good educational experience 4 0 48 48 3.4 3.1 2.9 3.1

* The average of responses after quantifying them as follows: Strongly Disagree=1, Disagree=2, Agree=3 and Strongly Agree=4. The mid-point of this scale is a rating of 2.5.
** If the number of evaluations is greater than the number of enrolments, there was an anomaly in the administration of SURF and the results may not be reliable.
*** To protect student anonymity, where there are fewer than 6 evaluations, results for the unit are not shown.
1 Surf online - Statistics
14/08/2013 https://www.surf.uwa.edu.au/SurfStats.aspx
Students' Unit Reflective Feedback


Unit title: Subsea Technology Unit code: OENA8554 Faculty: Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
Campus: Crawley Teaching period: SEM-2 2011 School: Mechanical Engineering
Start Date: 01/08/2011 End Date: 26/11/2011
Number of unit enrolments: 28 Number of Surf evaluations: 20
***
Response rate: 71.4%
**



** If the number of evaluations is greater than the number of enrolments, there was an anomaly in the administration of SURF and the results may not be reliable.
*** To protect student anonymity, where there are fewer than 6 evaluations, results for the unit are not shown.
Percentage of Responses Average Responses*
Question
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Agree
Strongly
Agree
Unit School Faculty UWA
Q1. It was clear what I was expected to learn in this unit 5 20 20 55 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.1
Q2. The assessment requirements were clearly stated 0 5 35 60 3.6 3.1 3.1 3.1
Q3. The assessment tasks were closely linked to the unit objectives 0 20 20 60 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.2
Q4. The unit was well organised 0 20 25 55 3.4 3.0 2.9 3.1
Q5. The learning resources (handouts, text, web resources, etc) were adequate for
my study in the unit
0 15 35 50 3.4 3.0 2.9 3.0
Q6. Overall, this unit was a good educational experience 5 10 25 60 3.4 3.1 3.0 3.1
* The average of responses after quantifying them as follows: Strongly Disagree=1, Disagree=2, Agree=3 and Strongly Agree=4. The mid-point of this scale is a rating of 2.5.
Page 1 of 1 Surf online - Statistics
14/12/2012 https://www.surf.uwa.edu.au/SurfStats.aspx
Students' Unit Reflective Feedback


Unit title: Subsea Technology Unit code: OENA8554 Faculty: Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
Campus: Crawley Teaching period: SEM-2 2010 School: Mechanical Engineering
Start Date: 26/07/2010 End Date: 20/11/2010
Number of unit enrolments: 55 Number of Surf evaluations: 33
***
Response rate: 60%
**



** If the number of evaluations is greater than the number of enrolments, there was an anomaly in the administration of SURF and the results may not be reliable.
*** To protect student anonymity, where there are fewer than 6 evaluations, results for the unit are not shown.
Percentage of Responses Average Responses*
Question
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Agree
Strongly
Agree
Unit School Faculty UWA
Q1. It was clear what I was expected to learn in this unit 0 3 58 39 3.4 3.0 2.9 3.0
Q2. The assessment requirements were clearly stated 3 6 55 36 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.1
Q3. The assessment tasks were closely linked to the unit objectives 9 6 36 48 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1
Q4. The unit was well organised 3 9 42 45 3.3 3.0 2.9 3.0
Q5. The learning resources (handouts, text, web resources, etc) were adequate for
my study in the unit
0 12 48 39 3.3 2.9 2.8 3.0
Q6. Overall, this unit was a good educational experience 0 9 52 39 3.3 3.1 2.9 3.1
* The average of responses after quantifying them as follows: Strongly Disagree=1, Disagree=2, Agree=3 and Strongly Agree=4. The mid-point of this scale is a rating of 2.5.
Page 1 of 1 Surf online - Statistics
14/12/2012 https://www.surf.uwa.edu.au/SurfStats.aspx
Students' Unit Reflective Feedback


Unit title: Marine Engineering Special Unit 2 Unit code: OENA8589 Faculty: Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
Campus: Crawley Teaching period: SEM-1 2009 School: Mechanical Engineering
Start Date: 23/02/2009 End Date: 20/06/2009
Number of unit enrolments: 27 Number of Surf evaluations: 15
***
Response rate: 55.6%
**



** If the number of evaluations is greater than the number of enrolments, there was an anomaly in the administration of SURF and the results may not be reliable.
*** To protect student anonymity, where there are fewer than 6 evaluations, results for the unit are not shown.
Percentage of Responses Average Responses*
Question
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Agree
Strongly
Agree
Unit School Faculty UWA
Q1. It was clear what I was expected to learn in this unit 14 7 50 29 2.9 2.8 3.0 3.0
Q2. The assessment requirements were clearly stated 13 13 47 27 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.1
Q3. The assessment tasks were closely linked to the unit objectives 7 7 40 47 3.3 3.0 3.1 3.2
Q4. The unit was well organised 7 13 47 33 3.1 2.8 2.9 3.1
Q5. The learning resources (handouts, text, web resources, etc) were adequate for
my study in the unit
7 13 47 33 3.1 2.8 2.9 3.0
Q6. Overall, this unit was a good educational experience 7 0 47 47 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.1
* The average of responses after quantifying them as follows: Strongly Disagree=1, Disagree=2, Agree=3 and Strongly Agree=4. The mid-point of this scale is a rating of 2.5.
Page 1 of 1 Surf online - Statistics
14/12/2012 https://www.surf.uwa.edu.au/SurfStats.aspx
Students' Unit Reflective Feedback


Unit title: Subsea Technology Unit code: OENA8554 Faculty: Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
Campus: Crawley Teaching period: TS-L-6 2008 School: Mechanical Engineering
Start Date: 22/09/2008 End Date: 31/10/2008
Number of unit enrolments: 4 Number of Surf evaluations: 1
***
Response rate: 25%
**



** If the number of evaluations is greater than the number of enrolments, there was an anomaly in the administration of SURF and the results may not be reliable.
*** To protect student anonymity, where there are fewer than 6 evaluations, results for the unit are not shown.
Percentage of Responses Average Responses*
Question
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Agree
Strongly
Agree
Unit School Faculty UWA
Q1. It was clear what I was expected to learn in this unit 3.0 2.9 3.0
Q2. The assessment requirements were clearly stated 3.1 3.0 3.1
Q3. The assessment tasks were closely linked to the unit objectives 3.1 3.1 3.1
Q4. The unit was well organised 2.9 2.9 3.0
Q5. The learning resources (handouts, text, web resources, etc) were adequate for
my study in the unit
2.9 2.8 3.0
Q6. Overall, this unit was a good educational experience 3.0 2.9 3.1
* The average of responses after quantifying them as follows: Strongly Disagree=1, Disagree=2, Agree=3 and Strongly Agree=4. The mid-point of this scale is a rating of 2.5.
Page 1 of 1 Surf online - Statistics
14/12/2012 https://www.surf.uwa.edu.au/SurfStats.aspx
Students' Unit Reflective Feedback


Unit title: Subsea Technology Unit code: OENA8554a Faculty: Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
Campus: Crawley Teaching period: TS-L-7 2007 School: Oil and Gas Engineering
Start Date: 08/10/2007 End Date: 16/11/2007
Number of unit enrolments: 46 Number of Surf evaluations: 8
***
Response rate: 17.4%
**



** If the number of evaluations is greater than the number of enrolments, there was an anomaly in the administration of SURF and the results may not be reliable.
*** To protect student anonymity, where there are fewer than 6 evaluations, results for the unit are not shown.
Percentage of Responses Average Responses*
Question
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Agree
Strongly
Agree
Unit School Faculty UWA
Q1. It was clear what I was expected to learn in this unit 13 0 50 38 3.1 2.8 2.9 3.0
Q2. The assessment requirements were clearly stated 13 0 38 50 3.3 2.9 3.0 3.1
Q3. The assessment tasks were closely linked to the unit objectives 13 0 50 38 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
Q4. The unit was well organised 13 0 25 63 3.4 2.8 2.9 3.0
Q5. The learning resources (handouts, text, web resources, etc) were adequate for
my study in the unit
13 0 50 38 3.1 2.8 2.9 3.0
Q6. Overall, this unit was a good educational experience 13 0 25 63 3.4 3.0 2.9 3.1
* The average of responses after quantifying them as follows: Strongly Disagree=1, Disagree=2, Agree=3 and Strongly Agree=4. The mid-point of this scale is a rating of 2.5.
Page 1 of 1 Surf online - Statistics
14/12/2012 https://www.surf.uwa.edu.au/SurfStats.aspx
Students' Unit Reflective Feedback


Unit title: Subsea Technology Unit code: RESR8554 Faculty: Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
Campus: Crawley Teaching period: TS-L-7 2006 School: Oil and Gas Engineering
Start Date: 09/10/2006 End Date: 17/11/2006
Number of unit enrolments: 43 Number of Surf evaluations: 22
***
Response rate: 51.2%
**



** If the number of evaluations is greater than the number of enrolments, there was an anomaly in the administration of SURF and the results may not be reliable.
*** To protect student anonymity, where there are fewer than 6 evaluations, results for the unit are not shown.
Percentage of Responses Average Responses*
Question
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Agree
Strongly
Agree
Unit School Faculty UWA
Q1. It was clear what I was expected to learn in this unit 9 9 59 23 3.0 2.9 2.9 3.0
Q2. The assessment requirements were clearly stated 5 9 50 36 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.1
Q3. The assessment tasks were closely linked to the unit objectives 9 14 50 27 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.2
Q4. The unit was well organised 5 14 59 23 3.0 2.9 2.9 3.1
Q5. The learning resources (handouts, text, web resources, etc) were adequate for
my study in the unit
14 14 57 14 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0
Q6. Overall, this unit was a good educational experience 5 18 41 36 3.1 3.0 2.9 3.1
* The average of responses after quantifying them as follows: Strongly Disagree=1, Disagree=2, Agree=3 and Strongly Agree=4. The mid-point of this scale is a rating of 2.5.
Page 1 of 1 Surf online - Statistics
14/12/2012 https://www.surf.uwa.edu.au/SurfStats.aspx