Name: ODarie Hunter - 1203600 Faculty: Faculty of Engineering (CIVIL) Course Name: Engineering Mechanics Lab 1 (MEE 2018) Lecturers Name: Jovan Ledgister Date Due: October 28, 2013
2
Table of Contents
Objectives..3 Theory..4 Apparatus5 Procedure6 Results7 -8 Discussion.9 Conclusion10 References11 Raw Data Sheet12 Sample Calculations.13
3
Objectives
1. To understand the moment of resistance in a beam 2. To measure the bending moment at an area of a loaded beam and to compare it to the theoretical value. 3. To convert strain readings to force readings
4
Theory
The bending moment is the force at a point which causes a body to rotate at that point. The bending moment can be calculated as the algebraic sum of the moments of the forces to one side of the point. To calculate bending moment in abeam the equation Experimental Shear Force:
is used. Bending moment: (shear force* distance
to cut section)
5
Apparatus
Weights and hanger Short beam Long beam Cantilever Supports with U brackets Underslung adjuster P4121 Data Acquisition Interface Spirit level
6
Procedure
Part 1 The apparatus was set up with the weight hangers at the appropriate positions and the beams were leveled. A reading was taken on the P4121 with no weights on the weight hangers. A 10N weight was added to the first weight hanger and a reading taken. The weight was removed and the beams leveled. The 10N weight was put on the second weight hanger and a reading taken. The weight was removed and the beams leveled again. The weight was then added to the third weight hanger and a reading was taken. The beam was leveled and steps were repeated using a 20N weight. Part 2 The load hangers were kept in the same position as part one and the beams were leveled. A zero reading was taken using the P4121. A 5N weight was placed on the second weight hanger, the beams were leveled and a new strain reading recorded. A 10N weight was placed on the first and second weight hangers. The beams were leveled and the new strain reading recorded. Part 3 All loads were removed from the hangers and the hangers arrange with each having a span of: W1-100; W2- 300; W3- 500. The beams were leveled and the P4121 strain readings recorded in table 3. Two load arrangements of the same total loading were set up by placing 5N on the leftmost hanger (W1) and 12N on the rightmost hanger (W3), followed by 5N on the leftmost hanger, 10N on the middle hanger and 2N on the rightmost hanger. For each arrangement the beams were leveled and the strain reading recorded.
7
Results
Load Strain Reading Bending Force (N) for load (N) W1 Bending Force W2 Bending Force W3 Bending Force 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 196 3.8MN 588 11.4MN 313 6.1MN 20 378 7.4MN 1224 23.8MN 606 11.8MN Bending Moment Nmm/ Theoretical Values 10 570MNmm 1710MNmm 915MNmm 20 1100NMmm 3750MNmm 1770MNmm Table1
During the experiment when the weights were doubled, the strain reading also doubled. In table 3 where the overall mass of the loads in the system were constant, the bending moment and strain readings were not the same. This is due to the positioning of the weights and the distance they were from the cut section of the beams. When the weights were doubled the strain reading did not double exactly but there was a slight deviation. This might have been cause by errors in the experiment. One major error throughout the experiment was the process of levelling the beams. To check if the beams were levelled a spirit level was used and different persons were used to level the beams. To minimize this error, one person is to be made responsible for levelling the beams to allow the error to be constant.
10
Conclusion
It can be concluded that the experimental results are in line with the theoretical values.
11
References
Structural Beam Deflection and Stress Formula and Calculation - Engineers Edge. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.engineersedge.com/beam_calc_menu.shtml
ChatGPT Money Machine 2024 - The Ultimate Chatbot Cheat Sheet to Go From Clueless Noob to Prompt Prodigy Fast! Complete AI Beginner’s Course to Catch the GPT Gold Rush Before It Leaves You Behind