1he Affordable Care AcL has expanded hlghquallLy, affordable healLh lnsurance coverage Lo mllllons of Amerlcans. Cne lmporLanL way ln whlch Lhe Affordable Care AcL ls expandlng coverage ls by provldlng generous flnanclal supporL Lo SLaLes LhaL opL Lo expand Medlcald ellglblllLy Lo all nonelderly lndlvlduals ln famllles wlLh lncomes below 133 percenL of Lhe lederal overLy Level.
1o daLe, 26 SLaLes and Lhe ulsLrlcL of Columbla have selzed Lhls opporLunlLy, and slnce Lhe beglnnlng of Lhe Affordable Care AcL's flrsL open enrollmenL perlod, 3.2 mllllon people have galned Medlcald or Chlldren's PealLh lnsurance rogram (CPl) coverage ln Lhese SLaLes, a Lally LhaL wlll grow ln Lhe monLhs and years ahead as Medlcald enrollmenL conLlnues. ln conLrasL, 24 SLaLes have noL yeL expanded Medlcald-lncludlng many of Lhe SLaLes LhaL would beneflL mosL and someLlmes because SLaLe leglslaLures have defled even Lhelr own governors-and denled healLh lnsurance coverage Lo mllllons of Lhelr clLlzens. 8esearchers aL Lhe urban lnsLlLuLe esLlmaLe LhaL, lf Lhese SLaLes do noL change course, 3.7 mllllon people wlll be deprlved of healLh lnsurance coverage ln 2016. Meanwhlle, Lhese SLaLes wlll forgo bllllons ln lederal dollars LhaL could boosL Lhelr economles.
1hls analysls uses Lhe besL evldence from Lhe economlcs and healLh pollcy llLeraLures Lo quanLlfy several lmporLanL consequences of SLaLes' declslons noL Lo expand Medlcald. 1haL evldence, whlch ls based prlmarlly on careful analysls of Lhe effecLs of pasL pollcy declslons, ls necessarlly an lmperfecL gulde Lo Lhe fuLure, and Lhe acLual effecLs of Medlcald expanslon under Lhe Affordable Care AcL could be larger or smaller Lhan Lhe esLlmaLes presenLed below. Powever, Lhls evldence ls clear LhaL Lhe consequences of SLaLes' declslons are farreachlng, wlLh lmpllcaLlons for Lhe healLh and wellbelng of Lhelr clLlzens, Lhelr economles, and Lhe economy of Lhe naLlon as a whole.
3
.-%/,* 0/'/1-*2 +1 345$'(/( )'2"%$',/ 6+7/%$8/ 1+% *9/ :/;<& )'2"%/( Cne dlrecL consequence of SLaLes' declslons noL Lo expand Medlcald ls LhaL mllllons of Lhelr unlnsured clLlzens wlll noL experlence Lhe lmproved access Lo healLh care, greaLer flnanclal securlLy, and beLLer healLh ouLcomes LhaL come wlLh lnsurance coverage. )#5%+7/( $,,/22 *+ ,$%/ Pavlng healLh lnsurance lmproves access Lo healLh care. 1hls analysls esLlmaLes LhaL lf Lhe SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so:
Pavlng healLh lnsurance lncreases Lhe probablllLy LhaL lndlvlduals have a usual source of cllnlc care, llke a prlmary care physlclan's offlce. lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so, an addlLlonal 1.4 mllllon people would have a usual source of cllnlc care once expanded coverage was fully ln effecL. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll achleve Lhls ouLcome for 1.0 mllllon people.
Pavlng healLh lnsurance lncreases Lhe probablllLy LhaL lndlvlduals reporL recelvlng all needed care" over Lhe prlor year. lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so, an addlLlonal 631,000 people would recelve all needed care" over a glven year once expanded coverage was fully ln effecL. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll achleve Lhls ouLcome for 494,000 people.
Pavlng healLh lnsurance lncreases Lhe probablllLy of recelvlng many Lypes of recommended and poLenLlally llfesavlng prevenLlve care, lncludlng:
CholesLerollevel screenlngs: lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so, Lhen each year an addlLlonal 829,000 people would recelve cholesLerollevel screenlngs once expanded coverage was fully ln effecL. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll achleve Lhls ouLcome for 630,000 people.
Mammograms: lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so, Lhen each year an addlLlonal 214,000 women beLween Lhe ages of 30 and 64 would recelve mammograms once expanded coverage was fully ln effecL. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll achleve Lhls ouLcome for 161,000 women ln Lhls age group.
apanlcolaou LesLs (pap smears"): lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so, Lhen each year an addlLlonal 343,000 women would recelve pap smears once expanded coverage was fully ln effecL. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll achleve Lhls ouLcome for 261,000 women. 4
Pavlng healLh lnsurance also lncreases recelpL of oLher Lypes of medlcal care. lor example, lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so, Lhey would enable an addlLlonal 13.4 mllllon physlclan offlce vlslLs each year once expanded coverage was fully ln effecL. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll enable an addlLlonal 11.7 mllllon physlclan offlce vlslLs each year. =%/$*/% 1-'$',-$< 2/,"%-*& Pavlng healLh lnsurance provldes proLecLlon from flnanclal hardshlp ln Lhe face of slckness. 1hls analysls esLlmaLes LhaL lf Lhe SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so:
PlghquallLy healLh lnsurance coverage dramaLlcally reduces Lhe rlsk LhaL lndlvlduals face caLasLrophlc ouLofpockeL medlcal cosLs (deflned as cosLs ln excess of 30 percenL of lncome). lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so, 233,000 fewer people would face caLasLrophlc medlcal cosLs each year once expanded coverage was fully ln effecL. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll ellmlnaLe caLasLrophlc medlcal cosLs for 194,000 people each year.
Pavlng healLh lnsurance reduces lndlvlduals' rlsk of havlng Lo borrow money Lo pay bllls or sklp a paymenL enLlrely ln order Lo pay medlcal bllls. lf Lhe 24 sLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so, 810,000 fewer people would reporL Lhls Lype of flnanclal sLraln over Lhe course of a year once expanded coverage was fully ln effecL. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll achleve Lhls ouLcome for 614,000 people each year. 0/**/% #/'*$< 9/$<*9 Pavlng lnsurance lmproves menLal healLh. 1hls analysls esLlmaLes LhaL lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so, Lhere would be 438,000 fewer people experlenclng depresslon once expanded coverage was fully ln effecL. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll reduce Lhe number of people experlenclng depresslon by 348,000. 0/**/% +7/%$<< 9/$<*9 Pavlng lnsurance coverage lmproves overall healLh. 1hls analysls esLlmaLes LhaL lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald dld so, 737,000 addlLlonal people would reporL belng ln excellenL, very good, or good healLh once expanded coverage was fully ln effecL. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll achleve Lhls ouLcome for 373,000 people.
3
0/'/1-*2 +1 345$'(-'8 >/(-,$-( 1+% !*$*/ 3,+'+#-/2 PealLhler workers who are less flnanclally sLressed and ln beLLer menLal healLh may be more llkely Lo parLlclpaLe ln Lhe workforce or have hlgher producLlvlLy on Lhe [ob, economlc beneflLs LhaL could be lmporLanL over Lhe long run. More lmmedlaLely, SLaLes LhaL fall Lo expand Medlcald are also passlng up bllllons of lederal dollars LhaL could boosL Lhelr economles Loday. 8y lncreaslng lowlncome lndlvlduals' ablllLy Lo access care, rellevlng cashsLrapped famllles of hlgh ouLofpockeL cosLs, and reduclng uncompensaLed care, Lhe expanslon ln lnsurance coverage enabled by Lhose lederal dollars would boosL demand for medlcal and nonmedlcal goods and servlces. Cver Lhe nexL few years, whlle Lhe recovery from Lhe 20072009 recesslon remalns lncompleLe and slack remalns ln Lhe economy, Lhls lncrease ln demand would boosL overall employmenL and economlc acLlvlLy.
1hls analysls esLlmaLes LhaL expandlng Medlcald would generaLe Lhe followlng beneflLs for SLaLes' economles Loday: ?((-*-+'$< @/(/%$< 1"'(2 8y expandlng Medlcald, SLaLes can pull bllllons ln addlLlonal lederal fundlng lnLo Lhelr economles every year, wlLh no SLaLe conLrlbuLlon over Lhe nexL Lhree years and only a modesL one LhereafLer for coverage for newly ellglble people. lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald had done so as of !anuary 1, Lhose SLaLes and Lhelr clLlzens would have recelved an addlLlonal $88 bllllon ln lederal supporL Lhrough calendar year 2016. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll recelve $84 bllllon over LhaL perlod. >+%/ A+B2 8y pumplng more lederal dollars lnLo Lhelr economles, SLaLes' declslons Lo expand Medlcald creaLe [obs. lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald had done so as of !anuary 1, Lhey would have boosLed employmenL by 83,000 [obs ln 2014, 184,000 [obs ln 2013, and a LoLal of 379,000 [obyears Lhrough 2017. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll boosL employmenL by 79,000 [obs ln 2014, 172,000 [obs ln 2013, and a LoLal of 336,000 [obyears Lhrough 2017. =%/$*/% +7/%$<< /,+'+#-, $,*-7-*& 8y pumplng more lederal dollars lnLo Lhelr economles, SLaLes' declslons Lo expand Medlcald lncrease Lhe overall level of economlc acLlvlLy. lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald had done so as of !anuary 1, Lhey would have creaLed an addlLlonal $66 bllllon ln LoLal economlc acLlvlLy Lhrough 2017. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll creaLe $62 bllllon ln LoLal economlc acLlvlLy Lhrough 2017.
1he remalnder of Lhls reporL provldes more deLall on SLaLes' opLlon Lo expand Medlcald under Lhe Affordable Care AcL, dlscusses Lhe effecLs of SLaLes' cholces for Lhelr unlnsured clLlzens and Lhelr economles, presenLs Lhe meLhodology used Lo quanLlfy Lhose effecLs, and provldes Lables and flgures wlLh SLaLebySLaLe deLall.
Medlcald ls a program [olnLly funded by Lhe lederal governmenL and Lhe SLaLes LhaL provldes healLh lnsurance Lo ellglble lowlncome people. Lach SLaLe operaLes lLs own Medlcald program and has conslderable flexlblllLy ln deLermlnlng ellglblllLy crlLerla. 1he Affordable Care AcL (ACA) glves SLaLes Lhe opLlon Lo expand Lhelr Medlcald programs Lo all nonelderly lndlvlduals ln famllles wlLh lncomes below 133 percenL of Lhe lederal overLy Level (lL). rogram rules provlde for an addlLlonal flve percenL lncome dlsregard," brlnglng Lhe effecLlve ellglblllLy Lhreshold Lo 138 percenL of lL: $16,103 for a slngle adulL or $32,913 for a famlly of four ln 2014. 8ecause chlldren aL Lhese lncome levels are generally already ellglble for Medlcald or Lhe Chlldren's PealLh lnsurance rogram, Lhls expanslon prlmarlly affecLs lowlncome adulLs. rlor Lo Lhe Affordable Care AcL's Medlcald expanslon, Lhe medlan ellglblllLy level for worklng parenLs was only 61 percenL of Lhe lL, and, ln nearly all SLaLes, nondlsabled adulLs wlLhouL chlldren were noL ellglble aL all (Peberleln eL al. 2013). As deplcLed ln llgure 1, as of !uly 2, 2014, 26 SLaLes and Lhe ulsLrlcL of Columbla had Laken advanLage of Lhls opLlon Lo expand Lhelr Medlcald programs.
7
1he lederal governmenL wlll cover Lhe vasL ma[orlLy of Lhe cosLs of expandlng Medlcald ellglblllLy under Lhe Affordable Care AcL. 1hrough 2016, Lhe lederal governmenL wlll pay 100 percenL of Lhe cosLs of coverlng newly ellglble lndlvlduals, falllng gradually Lo 90 percenL ln 2020 and subsequenL years. 1hls ls a conslderably larger lederal conLrlbuLlon Lhan for ellglblllLy caLegorles ln exlsLence before Lhe Affordable Care AcL, for whlch program cosLs are shared beLween Lhe lederal governmenL and Lhe SLaLes accordlng Lo a formula LhaL LargeLs addlLlonal asslsLance Lo lowerlncome SLaLes, wlLh Lhe lederal share averaglng around 37 percenL and ranglng from 30 percenL Lo [usL under 74 percenL ln flscal year 2014. 1
SLaLes elecLlng Lo expand Lhelr Medlcald programs are llkely Lo reallze large savlngs ln oLher areas of Lhelr budgeLs LhaL offseL even Lhe modesL lncrease ln SLaLe Medlcald spendlng afLer 2016. 8esearchers aL Lhe urban lnsLlLuLe have esLlmaLed LhaL, lf all SLaLes expanded Medlcald, reducLlons ln uncompensaLed care currenLly flnanced by SLaLe governmenLs would more Lhan offseL any addlLlonal Medlcald cosLs, generaLlng $10 bllllon ln savlngs over Len years for all SLaLes, alLhough Lhe neL lmpacL wlll vary by SLaLe (Polahan, 8ueLLgens, and uorn 2013). 1haL analysls also omlLs oLher poLenLlal SLaLe savlngs, lncludlng reduced cosLs Lo SLaLes of provldlng menLal healLh servlces LhaL would now be covered by Medlcald. 8elaLed research by some of Lhese same auLhors has concluded LhaL Lhese oLher savlngs may be subsLanLlal (8ueLLgens eL al. 2011).
Medlcald ls an lmporLanL componenL of Lhe Affordable Care AcL's overall approach Lo expandlng healLh lnsurance coverage. lndlvlduals wlLh lncomes under 100 percenL of Lhe lL are noL ellglble for Lax credlLs and cosLsharlng asslsLance Lhrough Lhe PealLh lnsurance MarkeLplaces and, as a consequence, wlll generally noL have access Lo affordable healLh lnsurance coverage lf Lhelr SLaLe does noL expand Medlcald. lurLhermore, Medlcald Lyplcally offers lower ouLofpockeL cosLs Lhan MarkeLplace coverage, so expandlng Medlcald wlll lower Lhe cosL of coverage for lndlvlduals ln famllles wlLh lncomes above 100 percenL and below 138 percenL of Lhe lL.
1 Chlldren (and, ln some SLaLes, pregnanL women) are ellglble for publlc lnsurance coverage Lhrough a relaLed program, Lhe Chlldren's PealLh lnsurance rogram. under Lhe maLchlng formula used for CPl, Lhe lederal governmenL pays a hlgher share of Lhe cosLs, averaglng abouL 70 percenL and ranglng across SLaLes beLween 63 Lo 81 percenL ln flscal year 2014. 8
1o esLlmaLe Lhe consequences of SLaLe declslons Lo expand Medlcald, Lhls analysls proceeds ln Lwo sLeps. llrsL, CLA obLalned esLlmaLes of SLaLes' Medlcald expanslon declslons on lnsurance coverage and Lhe amounL of lederal fundlng enLerlng SLaLe economles, Lhese esLlmaLes were elLher Laken dlrecLly from or derlved from publlcaLlons by Lhe urban lnsLlLuLe and Lhe Congresslonal 8udgeL Cfflce. Second, CLA used research on Lhe effecLs of pasL pollcy declslons Lo LranslaLe Lhose dlrecL effecLs lnLo lmpacLs on Lhe ulLlmaLe ouLcomes of lnLeresL: access Lo care, flnanclal securlLy, healLh and wellbelng, and Lhe naLlon's economlc performance.
1he avallable research llLeraLure unamblguously demonsLraLes LhaL SLaLe declslons Lo expand Medlcald wlll have large effecLs ln all of Lhese areas, effecLs LhaL are reflecLed ln Lhe esLlmaLes reporLed ln Lhls analysls. neverLheless, lL ls lmporLanL Lo keep ln mlnd LhaL, whlle all of Lhe sLudles Lhls reporL draws upon are rlgorous, all research has llmlLaLlons. SLaLlsLlcal analyses are sub[ecL Lo sampllng errors, as well as oLher lmperfecLlons LhaL can cause esLlmaLes Lo sysLemaLlcally oversLaLe or undersLaLe Lhe effecLs of Lhe pollcy changes sLudled. ln addlLlon, Lhe effecLs of pasL pollcy changes may noL be a perfecL gulde Lo Lhe effecLs of fuLure pollcy changes. As a consequence, whlle Lhe esLlmaLes presenLed ln Lhls analysls represenL Lhe besL avallable esLlmaLes of Lhe effecLs of expandlng Medlcald, Lhe acLual effecLs could Lurn ouL Lo be larger or smaller Lhan Lhe esLlmaLes presenLed ln Lhls reporL.
311/,*2 +' )'2"%$',/ 6+7/%$8/ 1he mosL dlrecL consequence of SLaLe declslons Lo expand Medlcald ls Lo lncrease lnsurance coverage ln LhaL SLaLe. 8ecause Lhe oLher beneflLs of expandlng Medlcald flow from Lhls baslc effecL, esLlmaLes of how expandlng Medlcald affecLs lnsurance coverage are a cruclal lnpuL lnLo Lhe resL of Lhe analyses underLaken ln Lhls reporL. ln Lhls reporL, CLA relles upon publlshed resulLs from Lhe urban lnsLlLuLe's PealLh lnsurance ollcy SlmulaLlon Model (PlSM), whlch provlde SLaLebySLaLe esLlmaLes of how each SLaLe's declslon abouL wheLher Lo expand Medlcald would affecL lnsurance coverage ln LhaL SLaLe (Polahan eL al. 2012, Polahan, 8ueLLgens, and uorn 2013). 1he PlSM naLlonal esLlmaLes of how Lhe Affordable Care AcL wlll affecL lnsurance coverage are broadly slmllar Lo Lhose produced by oLher analysLs, lncludlng Lhe Congresslonal 8udgeL Cfflce (C8C 2012a) and Lhe 8Anu CorporaLlon (Llbner eL al. 2010).
1he PlSM esLlmaLes show LhaL, lf all SLaLes expanded Medlcald, Lhe number of people ln Lhe unlLed SLaLes wlLh lnsurance coverage would lncrease by 10 mllllon by 2016, reflecLlng an lncrease of 4.3 mllllon ln Lhe 26 SLaLes and Lhe ulsLrlcL of Columbla LhaL have already expanded Lhe program and an lncrease of 3.7 mllllon ln Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have yeL do Lo so. 2 1hls reporL focuses on Lhe PlSM esLlmaLes for 2016 because Lhese should provlde a reasonable gulde of Lhe longrun effecLs of Medlcald expanslon on lnsurance coverage, afLer Lhe lnlLlal rampup." ConslsLenL wlLh LhaL, Lhls analysls refers Lo Lhese PlSM esLlmaLes for 2016 as reflecLlng Lhe effecLs of expanded Medlcald coverage when fully ln effecL." 1he deLalled SLaLebySLaLe esLlmaLes are reporLed ln 1able 1.
AcLual experlence slnce Lhe beglnnlng of Lhe Affordable Care AcL's flrsL open enrollmenL perlod has borne ouL modelbased predlcLlons LhaL SLaLes' declslons abouL wheLher Lo expand Medlcald wlll have slgnlflcanL lmpllcaLlons for lnsurance coverage. ln Lhe SLaLes (and Lhe ulsLrlcL of Columbla) LhaL have expanded Medlcald, Lhe number of people wlLh healLh lnsurance coverage Lhrough Medlcald (or CPl) has lncreased by 3.2 mllllon (13.3 percenL) from Lhe Lhlrd quarLer of 2013 Lhrough Aprll 2014 (CMS 2014). 3 8y conLrasL, Medlcald enrollmenL ln SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald has rlsen by 0.8 mllllon (3.3 percenL) over LhaL perlod. (1he modesL lncrease ln Medlcald enrollmenL ln sLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald ls llkely aLLrlbuLable Lo slmpllflcaLlons ln Medlcald ellglblllLy rules requlred of all SLaLes and ouLreach, publlc awareness, and new enrollmenL opLlons assoclaLed wlLh Lhe openlng of Lhe MarkeLplaces.)
Slmllarly, surveys have shown much larger lncreases ln lnsurance coverage ln SLaLes LhaL have expanded Medlcald relaLlve Lo sLaLes LhaL have noL. Comparlng Lhe Lhlrd quarLer of 2013 wlLh early March 2014, Lhe urban lnsLlLuLe's PealLh 8eform MonlLorlng Survey found a 4.0 percenLage polnL lncrease ln Lhe percenLage of nonelderly adulLs wlLh lnsurance coverage ln SLaLes LhaL had expanded Lhe program, compared Lo a 1.3 percenLage polnL lncrease ln SLaLes LhaL had noL done so (Long eL al. 2014). Slmllarly, a survey by Callup has found LhaL SLaLes LhaL expanded Medlcald and operaLed Lhelr own MarkeLplaces (alone or ln parLnershlp wlLh Lhe lederal governmenL) experlenced a 2.3 percenLage polnL lncrease ln Lhe share of adulLs wlLh lnsurance coverage from 2013 Lhrough Lhe flrsL quarLer of 2014, compared wlLh a 0.8 percenLage polnL lncrease ln SLaLes LhaL have noL Laken Lhese acLlons (WlLLers 2014).
2 PlSM flnds LhaL lf all SLaLes expanded Medlcald, Lhe lncrease ln Medlcald enrollmenL would be 13 mllllon, somewhaL larger Lhan Lhe 10 mllllon lncrease ln Lhe number of people wlLh healLh lnsurance coverage. 1he lncrease ln Medlcald enrollmenL ls larger Lhan Lhe lncrease ln lnsurance coverage prlmarlly because some lndlvlduals wlLh lncomes beLween 100 percenL of lL and 138 percenL of lL would swlLch from recelvlng subsldlzed coverage Lhrough Lhe MarkeLplaces Lo recelvlng coverage Lhrough Medlcald. 1he dlfference beLween Lhe Lwo esLlmaLes may also reflecL some offseLLlng reducLlon ln employer coverage. 3 ConnecLlcuL, Malne, and norLh uakoLa have noL reporLed sulLable enrollmenL daLa Lo CMS and are Lherefore noL lncluded ln Lhese LoLals. lor deLalls, see CMS' Aprll 2014 Medlcald enrollmenL reporL (CMS 2014). 11
311/,*2 +' ?,,/22 *+ $'( G2/ +1 >/(-,$< 6$%/ erhaps Lhe mosL obvlous purpose of Lhe Medlcald program ls Lo ensure LhaL enrollees have access Lo and recelve needed medlcal care. 1o quanLlfy Lhe lmprovemenL ln access Lo medlcal care LhaL wlll resulLs from SLaLes' declslons Lo expand Medlcald, Lhls analysls relles upon esLlmaLes from Lhe Cregon PealLh lnsurance LxperlmenL (llnkelsLeln eL al. 2012, 8alcker eL al. 2013a, 8alcker eL al. 2013b, 1aubman eL al. 2014). 1he Cregon PealLh lnsurance LxperlmenL (CPlL) arose from Lhe SLaLe of Cregon's declslon ln early 2008 Lo reopen enrollmenL under an earller Medlcald expanslon LhaL had exLended coverage Lo unlnsured adulLs wlLh lncomes under 100 percenL of Lhe lL. 8ecause Lhe SLaLe could noL accommodaLe all lnLeresLed appllcanLs, lL allocaLed Lhe opporLunlLy Lo enroll ln Medlcald by loLLery.
1he SLaLe of Cregon's declslon Lo allocaLe Medlcald coverage by loLLery creaLed a unlque research opporLunlLy. 8y comparlng lndlvlduals who won Lhe loLLery Lo lndlvlduals who losL Lhe loLLery, lL ls posslble Lo lsolaLe Lhe causal effecL of havlng or noL havlng Medlcald coverage, wlLhouL Lhe concern LhaL Lhe comparlson ls confounded by unobserved dlfferences beLween Lhose who do and do noL have Medlcald coverage. 8andomlzed research deslgns of Lhls klnd are consldered Lhe gold sLandard" ln soclal sclence research, and Lhe CPlL ls unlque ln uslng such a deslgn Lo sLudy Lhe effecLs of havlng healLh lnsurance.
An addlLlonal lmporLanL advanLage of Lhe CPlL for Lhe currenL analysls ls LhaL Lhe populaLlon LhaL galned coverage ln Lhe Medlcald expanslon sLudled ln Lhe CPlL-lowlncome, unlnsured adulLs- ls qulLe slmllar Lo Lhe group LhaL wlll galn healLh lnsurance coverage lf SLaLes expand Medlcald under Lhe Affordable Care AcL. 1hls lncreases Lhe confldence LhaL Lhe resulLs of Lhe CPlL can be exLrapolaLed Lo Lhe Affordable Care AcL's Medlcald expanslon.
Cf course, as noLed aL Lhe ouLseL, no sLudy based on pasL pollcy changes ln a speclflc envlronmenL applles perfecLly Lo a fuLure pollcy change ln a dlfferenL envlronmenL. Cregon's healLh care sysLem dlffers from oLher SLaLes' healLh care sysLems ln some ways, lncludlng Lhe avallablllLy of medlcal provlders (Puang and llnegold 2013), and oLher SLaLes' lowlncome populaLlons do noL look preclsely llke Cregon's. ln addlLlon, Lhe CPlL can only speak Lo resulLs over a followup perlod of approxlmaLely Lwo years, buL Lhe effecLs of lnsurance coverage could dlffer over longer perlods. llnally, Lhe effecLs of largerscale coverage expanslons could dlffer from Lhe effecLs of Lhe smallerscale expanslon examlned ln Lhe CPlL. neverLheless, Lhe CPlL clearly provldes Lhe besL avallable esLlmaLes for quanLlfylng many poLenLlal effecLs of SLaLes' declslons Lo expand Medlcald under Lhe Affordable Care AcL.
1he CPlL found LhaL Medlcald coverage slgnlflcanLly lmproves enrollees' access Lo medlcal care. Speclflcally, based on lnperson lnLervlews Lwo years afLer Lhe coverage loLLery, Lhe auLhors esLlmaLe LhaL Lhose enrolled ln Medlcald were more llkely Lo:
B*3*%1* 0&& (**.*. 30)*"
12
Medlcald coverage lncreased Lhe probablllLy LhaL lndlvlduals reporLed recelvlng all needed medlcal care over Lhe prlor 12 monLhs by 11.4 percenLage polnLs, relaLlve Lo a basellne raLe of 61.0 percenL ln Lhe conLrol group. #
;01* 0 -2-0& 2'-)3* '4 3&%(%3 30)*"
Medlcald coverage lncreased Lhe probablllLy LhaL lndlvlduals reporLed havlng a usual source of cllnlc care (e.g. a prlmary care physlclan) by 23.8 percenLage polnLs, relaLlve Lo a basellne probablllLy of 46.1 percenL ln Lhe conLrol group. 3
B*3*%1* )*3'$$*(.*. +)*1*(9%1* 30)*"
Medlcald coverage dramaLlcally lncreased recelpL of several lmporLanL Lypes of recommended prevenLlve care LhaL have been cllnlcally demonsLraLed Lo lmprove healLh ouLcomes:
CholesLerollevel screenlngs: Medlcald coverage lncreased Lhe probablllLy LhaL an lndlvldual recelved a cholesLerollevel screenlng ln Lhe lasL 12 monLhs by 14.6 percenLage polnLs, relaLlve Lo a basellne probablllLy of 27.2 ln Lhe conLrol group.
Mammograms: Medlcald coverage lncreased Lhe probablllLy LhaL women ages and 30 and older recelved a mammogram ln Lhe lasL 12 monLhs by 29.7 percenLage polnLs, relaLlve Lo a basellne probablllLy of 28.9 percenL ln Lhe conLrol group.
apanlcolaou LesLs (pap smears"): Medlcald coverage lncreased Lhe probablllLy LhaL a woman had recelved a pap smear ln Lhe lasL 12 monLhs by 14.4 percenLage polnLs, relaLlve Lo a basellne probablllLy of 44.9 percenL ln Lhe conLrol group. 6
4 Many lndlvlduals ln Lhe conLrol group reporLed recelvlng all needed care because no care was necessary or because Lhey were able Lo access care Lhrough oLher sources (lncludlng, for lndlvlduals who ulLlmaLely quallfled for Medlcald Lhrough oLher ellglblllLy paLhways, Medlcald lLself). Slmllarly, lndlvlduals wlLh Medlcald coverage may reporL noL recelvlng all needed care for a varleLy of reasons, lncludlng schedullng or LransporLaLlon dlfflculLles or challenges ln ldenLlfylng a sulLable provlder. 3 ln oLher work based on Lhe CPlL, Lhe auLhors flnd LhaL Medlcald lncreases emergency room uLlllzaLlon (1aubman eL al. 2014). 1hls flndlng ls noL lnconslsLenL wlLh Lhe lncrease ln Lhe probablllLy LhaL lndlvlduals had a usual source of cllnlc care, Medlcald may slmulLaneously lncrease access Lo prlmary care and make lndlvlduals more wllllng Lo make use of emergency rooms by proLecLlng Lhem from Lhe hlgh ouLofpockeL cosLs LhaL can come wlLh such a vlslL. ln addlLlon, Lhe flndlng LhaL Medlcald lncreases emergency room uLlllzaLlon could change when looklng over longer Llme perlods (as enrollees bulld sLronger relaLlonshlps wlLh Lhelr prlmary care physlclans) or as a resulL of efforLs Lo reform Lhe healLh care dellvery sysLem, lncludlng efforLs seL ln moLlon by Lhe Affordable Care AcL. 6 ApproxlmaLely half of SLaLes' Medlcald programs have underLaken famlly plannlng expanslons" under whlch Lhey offer Medlcald coverage for famlly plannlng and relaLed servlces, lncludlng pap smears, Lo some lndlvlduals who are noL ellglble for full Medlcald beneflLs (CuLLmacher lnsLlLuLe 2014). ln almosL all such SLaLes, women who would galn ellglblllLy for full Medlcald beneflLs lf Lhelr SLaLe expands Medlcald under Lhe Affordable Care AcL could already have obLalned coverage for pap smears vla Lhe SLaLe's famlly plannlng expanslon.
Cregon had a famlly plannlng expanslon ln place durlng Lhe CPlL under whlch ellglblllLy exLended up Lo 183 percenL of Lhe lL (Sonfleld, Alrlch, and 8enson Cold 2008), Lhe SLaLe has slnce exLended ellglblllLy Lhrough 230 13
B*3*%1* '9/*) 9:+*2 '4 $*.%30& 30)*"
Medlcald coverage also lncreased recelpL of oLher caLegorles of medlcal care. Medlcald coverage made posslble an addlLlonal 2.7 offlce vlslLs over Lhe course of a year, relaLlve Lo 3.3 vlslLs ln Lhe conLrol group. Slmllarly, Medlcald lncreased Lhe number of prescrlpLlon medlcaLlons an lndlvldual was currenLly Laklng by 0.7 prescrlpLlons, relaLlve Lo 1.8 prescrlpLlons ln Lhe conLrol group.
Whlle Lhe CPlL ls unlquely wellsulLed Lo Lhe currenL analysls ln llghL of lLs randomlzed deslgn and focus on a populaLlon LhaL ls very slmllar Lo Lhe populaLlon LhaL wlll galn coverage lf more sLaLes elecL Lo expand Medlcald, Lhe flndlng LhaL havlng healLh lnsurance or more generous healLh lnsurance lncreases access Lo healLh care servlces has been convlnclngly demonsLraLed ln many healLh care seLLlngs. PlghquallLy sLudles arrlvlng aL slmllar concluslons lnclude Lhe well known 8Anu PealLh lnsurance LxperlmenL (newhouse 1993), sLudles of pasL Medlcald expanslons (e.g. Currle and Cruber 1996, Sommers, 8alcker, and LpsLeln 2012), sLudles of Lhe effecL of galnlng Medlcare ellglblllLy aL age 63 (e.g. McWllllams eL al. 2007, Card eL al. 2009), and a promlnenL sLudy of MassachuseLLs healLh reform (Sommers, Long, and 8alcker 2014).
1o LranslaLe Lhe CPlL esLlmaLes lnLo Lhe number of addlLlonal lndlvlduals esLlmaLed Lo have speclfled Lype of healLh care experlence ln each SLaLe, Lhe relevanL polnL esLlmaLes were slmply mulLlplled by Lhe PlSM esLlmaLes of Lhe number of lndlvlduals who would galn coverage ln LhaL SLaLe lf Lhe SLaLe expands Medlcald coverage. 7 Several of Lhe prevenLlve care esLlmaLes apply only Lo parLlcular age and gender subgroups, CLA esLlmaLed Lhe share of new Medlcald enrollees who fall ln Lhe relevanL subgroups uslng Lhe Amerlcan CommunlLy Survey and Lhe meLhodology descrlbed ln Appendlx A and Lhen scaled down Lhe PlSM esLlmaLes accordlngly.
1he resulLlng SLaLebySLaLe esLlmaLes of Lhe lncrease ln recelpL of medlcal care are reporLed ln 1able 2 (prevenLlve care) and 1able 3 (oLher uLlllzaLlon measures). llgure 2 summarlzes Lhe lncreases ln uLlllzaLlon of prevenLlve care LhaL SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald could achleve once expanded coverage ls fully ln effecL, as well as Lhe galns accrulng Lo SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Lhe program. llgure 3 maps Lhe SLaLelevel esLlmaLes of Lhe lncrease ln Lhe annual number of cholesLerollevel screenlngs lf each SLaLe expands Medlcald.
percenL of Lhe lL (CuLLmacher lnsLlLuLe 2014). 1he CPlL neverLheless found LhaL galnlng full Medlcald coverage lncreased pap smear uLlllzaLlon, perhaps because accesslng such care ls easler ln Lhe conLexL of coverage for a comprehenslve seL of healLh care servlces. 1hls suggesLs LhaL expandlng ellglblllLy for full Medlcald beneflLs wlll lncrease pap smear uLlllzaLlon even ln SLaLes wlLh a famlly plannlng expanslon ln place. Lxpandlng ellglblllLy for full Medlcald beneflLs mlghL be expecLed Lo have a larger effecL ln SLaLes wlLhouL a famlly plannlng expanslon, ln whlch case Lhe esLlmaLes ln Lhls reporL wlll undersLaLe Lhe lncreases ln Lhose SLaLes. Slmllarly, SLaLe and local healLh deparLmenLs provlde cerLaln screenlng servlces funded Lhrough federal granL programs or oLher sources. As wlLh famlly plannlng expanslons, Lhe exlsLence of such programs should noL affecL Lhe concluslon LhaL expandlng ellglblllLy for Medlcald would lncrease uLlllzaLlon of Lhese servlces. 7 1he resulLs presenLed by Lhe CPlL reflecL Lhe effecL of ever belng on Medlcald durlng Lhe sLudy perlod, so noL all lndlvlduals were enrolled ln Medlcald for Lhe full perlod over whlch Lhe change ln uLlllzaLlon was measured. 1he effecL of conLlnuous Medlcald enrollmenL on Lhe ouLcomes examlned ln Lhls reporL would llkely be larger, so Lhese esLlmaLes are somewhaL conservaLlve. 14
0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 Mammograms apanlcolaou 1esLs CholesLerolLevel Screenlngs SLaLes Lxpandlng Medlcald SLaLes noL ?eL Lxpandlng Medlcald lncrease ln annual number of lndlvlduals recelvlng speclfled Lype of care I,-@>% 4J C>"K%/#%+ =*/>%)?% ,* L#,;,M)#,"* "B C>%G%*#,G% F)>% ,B H#)#%? &'()*+ .%+,/),+1 :N F@>>%*# &'()*?,"* H#)#@? Sources: urban lnsLlLuLe, 8alcker eL al. (2013), CLA calculaLlons. noLe: LsLlmaLes reflecL effecLs when expanded coverage ls fully ln effecL. See LexL for meLhodologlcal deLalls. lncreases ln recelpL of mammograms reflecL only women 30 and older. 13
311/,*2 +' @-'$',-$< !/,"%-*& Whlle one lmporLanL goal of Lhe Medlcald program ls Lo ensure LhaL enrollees have access Lo medlcal care, an equally lmporLanL goal ls Lo proLecL famllles from large ouLofpockeL medlcal cosLs and ensure LhaL lllness does noL LhreaLen famllles' ablllLy Lo meeL oLher lmporLanL needs. 1o quanLlfy Lhe lmprovemenLs ln flnanclal securlLy resulLlng from SLaLe declslons Lo expand Medlcald under Lhe Affordable Care AcL, Lhls analysls Lurns once agaln Lo Lhe CPlL, whlch found LhaL Medlcald coverage slgnlflcanLly lmproved flnanclal securlLy.
1hls analysls focuses on Lwo speclflc ouLcomes measured ln Lhe CPlL, whlch were measured uslng lnperson lnLervlews Lwo years afLer Lhe coverage loLLery:
C09029)'+/%3 '-9'4+'3?*9 3'292"
Medlcald coverage nearly ellmlnaLed Lhe rlsk of faclng caLasLrophlc ouLofpockeL medlcal cosLs (deflned ln Lhe sLudy as ouLofpockeL spendlng ln excess of 30 percenL of household lncome) durlng Lhe prlor year. Speclflcally, belng enrolled ln Medlcald reduced Lhe probablllLy of experlenclng such an ouLcome by 4.3 percenLage polnLs, relaLlve Lo a basellne rlsk of 3.3 percenL ln Lhe conLrol group.
D)'-=&* +0:%(A =%&&2 .-* 9' $*.%30& *E+*(2*2"
Medlcald coverage dramaLlcally reduced Lhe rlsk LhaL an lndlvldual reporLed havlng borrowed money or sklpped paylng oLher bllls due Lo medlcal expenses durlng Lhe prlor year. Speclflcally, belng enrolled ln Medlcald reduced Lhe probablllLy of experlenclng such an ouLcome by 14.2 percenLage polnLs, relaLlve Lo a basellne rlsk of 24.4 percenL ln Lhe conLrol group.
1he CPlL also found LhaL Medlcald coverage reduced Lhe average amounL of ouLofpockeL spendlng and Lhe probablllLy of havlng any medlcal debL. ln addlLlon, ln earller work uslng credlL reporL daLa, Lhe CPlL lnvesLlgaLors documenLed a large reducLlon ln Lhe probablllLy of havlng had a medlcal blll senL Lo a collecLlon agency over sllghLly more Lhan one year of followup.
As wlLh Lhe healLh care uLlllzaLlon resulLs dlscussed ln Lhe lasL subsecLlon, Lhe flndlng LhaL healLh lnsurance lmproves flnanclal securlLy ls noL unlque Lo Lhe CPlL. llnkelsLeln and McknlghL (2008) demonsLraLe LhaL Lhe lnLroducLlon of Medlcare ln 1963 led Lo sharp reducLlons ln senlors' exposure Lo large ouLofpockeL medlcal cosLs. Cross and noLowldlgdo (2011) examlne Medlcald expanslons durlng Lhe 1990s and early 2000s and flnd LhaL Lhose expanslons slgnlflcanLly reduced Lhe rlsk of consumer bankrupLcy. 8
8 uslng credlL reporL daLa, Lhe CPlL found no evldence of a reducLlon ln Lhe rlsk of bankrupLcy over a followup perlod exLendlng sllghLly more Lhan one year from Lhe daLe LhaL loLLery wlnners galned coverage, desplLe flndlng large lmprovemenLs on oLher measures of flnanclal sLraln. 1hls dlfference ln resulLs could reflecL Lhe much longer followup perlod avallable Lo Cross and noLowldlgdo. AlLernaLlvely, lL could reflecL dlfferences ln Lhe Lypes of Medlcald expanslons under sLudy, Lhe expanslons sLudled by Cross and noLowldlgdo prlmarlly affecLed chlldren, whlle Lhe expanslon sLudled ln Lhe CPlL affecLed adulLs. 1he llmlLed sample slze avallable ln Lhe CPlL does noL appear Lo explaln Lhe dlfference ln resulLs, as Lhe dlfference beLween Lhe esLlmaLe reporLed by Lhe CPlL and Lhe esLlmaLe reporLed by Cross and noLowldlgdo approaches sLandard Lhresholds for sLaLlsLlcal slgnlflcance. 18
1o LranslaLe Lhe CPlL esLlmaLes lnLo Lhe number of lndlvlduals esLlmaLed Lo avold Lhese negaLlve flnanclal ouLcomes ln each SLaLe, Lhe CPlL polnL esLlmaLe was mulLlplled by Lhe PlSM esLlmaLes of Lhe number of lndlvlduals esLlmaLed Lo galn coverage ln LhaL SLaLe lf Lhe SLaLe expands Medlcald coverage. 1he resulLlng SLaLebySLaLe esLlmaLes of Lhe reducLlon ln Lhe number of lndlvlduals faclng adverse flnanclal ouLcomes due Lo hlgh ouLofpockeL medlcal cosLs are reporLed ln 1able 4. llgure 4 summarlzes Lhe reducLlon ln Lhe lncldence of adverse flnanclal ouLcomes LhaL SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald could achleve once expanded coverage ls fully ln effecL, as well as Lhe galns for SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Lhe program. llgure 3 maps Lhe SLaLelevel esLlmaLes of Lhe reducLlon ln Lhe number of lndlvlduals borrowlng money or sklpplng paymenLs on oLher bllls due Lo medlcal expenses lf each SLaLe expands Medlcald.
1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 CaLasLrophlc CuLofockeL Medlcal CosLs 8orrowlng Lo ay 8llls or Sklpplng aymenLs uue Lo Medlcal Lxpenses SLaLes Lxpandlng Medlcald SLaLes noL ?eL Lxpandlng Medlcald Change ln annual number of people experlenclng llsLed ouLcome I,-@>% 6J C>"K%/#%+ Q%+@/#,"* ,* #E% =*/,+%*/% "B I,*)*/,); S)>+?E,( ,B H#)#%? &'()*+ .%+,/),+1 :N F@>>%*# &'()*?,"* H#)#@? Source: urban lnsLlLuLe, 8alcker eL al. (2013), CLA calculaLlons. noLe: LsLlmaLes reflecL effecLs when expanded coverage ls fully ln effecL. See LexL for meLhodologlcal deLalls. 19
311/,*2 +' H/$<*9 F"*,+#/2 Medlcald also seeks Lo lmprove enrollees' healLh. 1he flndlngs above showlng LhaL Medlcald lncreases recelpL of recommended medlcal care-care for whlch Lhere ls a sLrong cllnlcal evldence base demonsLraLlng lLs effecLlveness ln lmprovlng healLh-[usLlfles a sLrong presumpLlon LhaL Medlcald does lndeed lmprove enrollees' healLh. neverLheless, dlrecL evldence LhaL healLh lnsurance lmproves healLh ls deslrable.
1o quanLlfy effecLs on menLal healLh, Lhls analysls Lurns once more Lo Lhe CPlL. 1he CPlL found LhaL Medlcald coverage reduced Lhe probablllLy LhaL an lndlvldual screened poslLlve for depresslon on Lhe basls of a sLandard elghLquesLlon quesLlonnalre by 9.2 percenLage polnLs, relaLlve Lo a 30.0 percenL basellne probablllLy ln Lhe conLrol group. 9 Medlcald coverage also
9 As dlscussed below, Lhls analysls does noL use Lhe CPlL Lo quanLlfy Lhe effecLs of Medlcald on physlcal healLh, as Lhe relevanL esLlmaLes are lmpreclse and noL sLaLlsLlcally dlfferenL from zero. Cne concern wlLh uslng Lhe only Lhe resulLs from Lhe CPlL LhaL happen Lo be sLaLlsLlcally slgnlflcanL ls LhaL, as Lhe number of healLh ouLcomes under conslderaLlon rlses, Lhe probablllLy LhaL one wlll be sLaLlsLlcally slgnlflcanL purely by chance rlses as well, even lf, ln LruLh, Medlcald has no effecL on any of Lhese ouLcomes. ln Lhls case, focuslng on Lhe sLaLlsLlcally slgnlflcanL esLlmaLes and dlsregardlng Lhe oLhers can be mlsleadlng, a problem sLaLlsLlclans and economeLrlclans refer Lo as Lhe problem of mulLlple comparlsons." 21
generaLed lmprovemenLs ln selfreporLed menLal healLh, as measured uslng a sLandard Lhree quesLlon baLLery on Lhe effecL of menLal healLh on quallLy of llfe.
1wo sLeps were used Lo LranslaLe CPlL's esLlmaLe LhaL Medlcald reduced Lhe probablllLy of screenlng poslLlve for depresslon lnLo Lhe reducLlon ln Lhe number of people acLually experlenclng depresslon lf each SLaLe expanded Medlcald. llrsL, Lhe reducLlon ln Lhe number of people who would 23)**( poslLlve for depresslon was obLalned by mulLlplylng Lhe CPlL polnL esLlmaLe by Lhe PlSM esLlmaLes of Lhe number of lndlvlduals who wlll galn coverage ln each SLaLe lf LhaL sLaLe expands lLs Medlcald program. rlor research has esLlmaLed LhaL 88 percenL of Lhose who screen poslLlve for depresslon uslng Lhls screenlng Lool are found Lo be experlenclng ma[or depresslon on Lhe basls of a cllnlcal lnLervlew (kroenke eL al. 2001). 1hus, Lo obLaln Lhe flnal esLlmaLes of Lhe reducLlon ln Lhe lncldence of depresslon, Lhe reducLlon ln Lhe number of poslLlve screenlng resulLs was mulLlplled by 0.88. 10 1he resulLlng SLaLebySLaLe esLlmaLes of Lhe reducLlon ln Lhe number of lndlvlduals experlenclng depresslon are reporLed ln 1able 3.
1urnlng Lo physlcal healLh, Lhe CPlL provldes clear evldence LhaL lndlvlduals recelvlng Medlcald percelved Lhemselves Lo be ln beLLer healLh. ln resulLs Lhrough approxlmaLely Lwo years of followup, Medlcald coverage lncreased Lhe share of lndlvlduals reporLlng LhaL Lhelr healLh had remalned Lhe same or lmproved over Lhe prlor year by 7.8 percenLage polnLs, relaLlve Lo a basellne probablllLy of 80.4 percenL ln Lhe conLrol group. ln earller resulLs Lhrough sllghLly more Lhan one year of followup, Medlcald also lncreased Lhe probablllLy LhaL an lndlvldual reporLed LhaL hls or her healLh was good, very good, or excellenL by 13.3 percenLage polnLs, relaLlve Lo a basellne probablllLy of 34.8 percenL ln Lhe conLrol group.
1o LranslaLe Lhe CPlL esLlmaLe of Lhe effecL of Medlcald on Lhe number of lndlvlduals reporLlng LhaL Lhey are ln good, very good, or excellenL healLh lnLo an esLlmaLe of Lhe number of addlLlonal people who would assess Lhelr healLh ln Lhls way lf each SLaLe expanded Medlcald, Lhe CPlL polnL esLlmaLe ls slmply mulLlplled by Lhe number of people who wlll galn coverage lf each SLaLe expands lLs Medlcald program. 1he resulLlng SLaLebySLaLe esLlmaLes are reporLed ln 1able 3 and are mapped ln llgure 6. llgure 7 summarlzes Lhe lmprovemenLs ln Lhls measure of healLh LhaL SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald could achleve once expanded coverage ls fully ln effecL, as well as Lhe galns for SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Lhe program.
Cne way of addresslng Lhls problem ls Lo seL a hlgher Lhreshold for sLaLlsLlcal slgnlflcance when evaluaLlng Lhe resulLs of mulLlple sLaLlsLlcal LesLs. uslng a sLandard meLhod for compuLlng LhaL hlgher Lhreshold (known as Lhe 8onferronl meLhod") whlle Laklng lnLo accounL LhaL Lhe sLudy also examlned effecLs on hlgh blood pressure, cholesLerol levels, and blood sugar conLrol, Lhe pvalue for Lhe esLlmaLed effecL of Medlcald coverage on depresslon remalns below 10 percenL. 1hls lndlcaLes LhaL Lhe CPlL's depresslon resulLs are sLlll unllkely Lo have arlsen by chance, even afLer accounLlng for mulLlple comparlsons. 10 1hls approach llkely sllghLly undersLaLes Lhe acLual reducLlon ln depresslon as a resulL of expandlng Medlcald. kroenke eL al. demonsLraLe LhaL Lhe screenlng Lool used by Lhe CPlL researchers also occaslonally mlsses lndlvlduals who appear depressed ln a cllnlcal lnLervlew. 1o Lhe exLenL LhaL Medlcald also reduces depresslon ln Lhese lndlvlduals, Lhe effecLs on Lhe overall lncldence of depresslon would be correspondlngly larger. 22
0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 300,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 SLaLes Lxpandlng Medlcald SLaLes noL ?eL Lxpandlng Medlcald Change ln number of people reporLlng good/very good/excellenL healLh Source: urban lnsLlLuLe, llnkelsLeln eL al. (2012), CLA calculaLlons. noLe: LsLlmaLes reflecL effecLs when expanded coverage ls fully ln effecL. See LexL for meLhodologlcal deLalls. I,-@>% RJ C>"K%/#%+ =*/>%)?% ,* !@A:%> "B C%"(;% Q%(">#,*- U""+1 V%>N U""+1 "> &'/%;;%*# S%);#E ,B H#)#%? &'()*+ .%+,/),+1 :N F@>>%*# &'()*?,"* H#)#@? 23
1he llmlLed sample slze of Lhe CPlL makes lL more dlfflculL Lo reach flrm concluslons abouL Lhe effecL of Medlcald on ob[ecLlve measures of physlcal healLh slnce Lhe CPlL esLlmaLes were generally lmpreclse. 1he CPlL dld aLLempL Lo measure Lhe effecL of Medlcald coverage on several physlcal healLh ouLcomes, lncludlng Lhe lncldence of hlgh blood pressure, hlgh cholesLerol, and poor conLrol of blood sugar. 1he sLudy's +'%(9 *29%$09*2 (roughly speaklng, a polnL esLlmaLe ls Lhe mosL llkely slngle value ln llghL of a sLudy's daLa) showed some lmprovemenL ln each of Lhese domalns. lor example, Lhe sLudy's polnL esLlmaLe was LhaL Medlcald reduced Lhe lncldence of elevaLed blood pressure by 1.3 percenLage polnLs, relaLlve Lo a basellne lncldence of 16.3 percenL ln Lhe conLrol group, Lhe polnL esLlmaLes for Lhe oLher measured dlmenslons of physlcal healLh were, ln proporLlonal Lerms, slmllar or larger. ln early resulLs, Lhe CPlL also reporLed a polnL esLlmaLe suggesLlng LhaL Medlcald reduced morLallLy over a followup perlod of sllghLly more Lhan one year. 1hese polnL esLlmaLes would generally be cllnlcally meanlngful lf Lhey exacLly reflecLed reallLy (lrakL 2013a, lrakL 2013b).
Powever, Lhe CPlL's sample slze was (by necesslLy) qulLe llmlLed, so Lhe preclslon wlLh whlch Lhese changes ln healLh ouLcomes could be measured was also llmlLed. As a resulL, Lhese esLlmaLed lmprovemenLs ln physlcal healLh fell far shorL of sLaLlsLlcal slgnlflcance, and lL ls lmposslble Lo deLermlne wlLh any confldence wheLher Lhe polnL esLlmaLes descrlbed above arose because Medlcald acLually generaLed lmprovemenLs ln physlcal healLh or lf Medlcald acLually has negllglble effecLs on physlcal healLh, and Lhese esLlmaLes were slmply obLalned by chance. lor example, whlle Lhe sLudy's polnL esLlmaLe was LhaL Medlcald reduced Lhe lncldence of hlgh blood pressure by 1.3 percenLage polnLs, a 93 percenL confldence lnLerval around LhaL esLlmaLe sLreLches from a 7.2 percenLage polnL reducLlon ln lncldence Lo a 4.3 percenLage polnL lncrease ln lncldence. Closely relaLed, lL may noL have been reasonable Lo expecL Lhe CPlL Lo flnd sLaLlsLlcally slgnlflcanL lmprovemenLs ln physlcal healLh sLemmlng from Medlcald coverage. 1o be rellably deLecLed by Lhe CPlL, Lhe effecLs of Medlcald on physlcal healLh would have had Lo be qulLe large, ofLen larger Lhan whaL seems medlcally plauslble (lrakL 2013a, lrakL 2013b, 8lchardson, Carroll, and lrakL 2013, Mulllgan 2013).
ln llghL of Lhe llmlLaLlons of Lhe CPlL for learnlng abouL Lhe effecLs of Medlcald on ob[ecLlve physlcal healLh ouLcomes, lL ls useful Lo examlne a parallel llLeraLure LhaL uses quasl experlmenLs" creaLed by pasL pollcy changes Lo sLudy how Medlcald coverage affecLs healLh ouLcomes. 1he dlsadvanLage of relylng on quaslexperlmenLal research ls LhaL lL ls more vulnerable Lo unobserved confoundlng facLors Lhan research uslng a randomlzed research deslgn. Powever, Lhese quaslexperlmenLal sLudles have Lhe lmporLanL advanLage LhaL Lhey can ofLen draw on much larger samples and, Lhus, dellver much more preclse esLlmaLes.
1wo recenL quaslexperlmenLal sLudles are parLlcularly relevanL ln Lhls conLexL slnce Lhey examlne lnsurance expanslons LhaL, llke SLaLe Medlcald expanslons under Lhe Affordable Care AcL, prlmarlly affecL low or moderaLelncome adulLs. Sommers, Long, and 8alcker (2014) sLudy Lhe morLallLy effecLs of MassachuseLLs healLh reform, whlch prlmarlly affecLed adulLs wlLh lncomes slmllar Lo or modesLly hlgher Lhan Lhose affecLed by Lhe Affordable Care AcL's Medlcald expanslon, by comparlng morLallLy Lrends ln MassachuseLLs counLles Lo morLallLy Lrends ln demographlcally slmllar counLles ln Lhe resL of Lhe counLry. 1hey flnd LhaL Lhe morLallLy raLe for 24
MassachuseLLs adulLs fell by 2.9 percenL from Lhe years before reform Lo Lhe years afLer reform, relaLlve Lo Lhe comparlson counLles. 1he auLhors documenL LhaL morLallLy followed slmllar Lrends ln MassachuseLLs counLles and comparlson counLles before reform, LhaL Lhe morLallLy galns were concenLraLed ln counLles wlLh lower lncomes and lower lnsurance coverage raLes prlor Lo reform, and LhaL Lhe lmprovemenLs were prlmarlly ln causes of deaLh belleved Lo be avoldable wlLh beLLer healLh care, all of Lhese flndlngs are conslsLenL wlLh Lhe lnLerpreLaLlon LhaL Lhe observed fall ln morLallLy ln MassachuseLLs was caused by Lhe expanslon of lnsurance coverage. noLably, Lhe auLhors' esLlmaLe falls well wlLhln Lhe very wlde 93 percenL confldence lnLerval assoclaLed wlLh Lhe lmpreclse correspondlng CPlL esLlmaLe.
Sommers, 8alcker, and LpsLeln (2012) examlne preACA expanslons of Medlcald coverage Lo low lncome adulLs ln Arlzona, new ?ork, and Malne. Much llke Sommers, Long, and 8alcker, Lhe auLhors esLlmaLe how Lhese Medlcald expanslons affecLed Lhe rlsk of deaLh by comparlng morLallLy Lrends ln Lhe Lhree expanslon sLaLes Lo morLallLy Lrends ln nelghborlng sLaLes. 1hey flnd LhaL Lhe morLallLy raLe for adulLs fell by 6.1 percenL ln Lhe expanslon sLaLes relaLlve Lo non expandlng SLaLes ln Lhe years around Lhe reform. 1hey documenL LhaL morLallLy Lrends were slmllar ln expanslon and nonexpanslon sLaLes before reform and LhaL Lhe morLallLy galns were concenLraLed ln lowerlncome counLles, conslsLenL wlLh Lhe lnLerpreLaLlon LhaL Lhe fall ln morLallLy ln Lhe expanslon sLaLes was caused by expanded lnsurance coverage. 1hls esLlmaLe ls also noL sLaLlsLlcally dlfferenL from Lhe lmpreclse correspondlng CPlL esLlmaLe.
1hese are noL Lhe only quaslexperlmenLal sLudles examlnlng Lhe llnk beLween healLh lnsurance sLaLus and healLh ouLcomes, alLhough Lhey are Lhe Lwo LhaL are mosL relevanL Lo evaluaLlng Lhe consequences of SLaLes' Medlcald expanslon declslons. Currle and Cruber (1994), Currle and Cruber (1996), Meyer and Wherry (2012) examlne pasL Medlcald expanslons affecLlng pregnanL women, chlldren, and Leens, respecLlvely, and flnd LhaL Lhose coverage expanslons reduced morLallLy. Card, uobkln, and MaesLas (2009) documenL a dlscreLe reducLlon ln morLallLy for paLlenLs arrlvlng aL Lhe hosplLal wlLh nondeferrable" condlLlons aL age 63, colncldlng wlLh Lhe beglnnlng of ellglblllLy for Medlcare. Levy and MelLzer (2008) underLake a careful revlew of Lhe quaslexperlmenLal llLeraLure and conclude LhaL, whlle LhaL llLeraLure ls noL unanlmous on Lhls quesLlon, Lhe balance of Lhe evldence demonsLraLes LhaL expandlng access Lo healLh lnsurance coverage lmproves healLh for speclflc wellsLudled populaLlons. 1he resulLs from Sommers, Long, and 8alcker (2014) and Sommers, 8alcker, and LpsLeln (2012) provlde sLrong evldence LhaL Lhls general concluslon LhaL expanded coverage lmproves healLh applles Lo coverage expanslons LhaL affecL low and moderaLelncome adulLs, llke Medlcald expanslons under Lhe Affordable Care AcL.
311/,*2 +' !*$*/ 3,+'+#-/2 $'( *9/ :$*-+'$< 3,+'+#& ln addlLlon Lo Lhelr effecLs on lnsurance coverage, access Lo healLh care, and healLh and well belng, SLaLes declslons Lo expand Medlcald wlll also have lmmedlaLe macroeconomlc beneflLs by drawlng addlLlonal lederal fundlng lnLo SLaLe economles. As descrlbed ln greaLer deLall below, Lhls addlLlonal lederal fundlng wlll lncrease demand for boLh medlcal and nonmedlcal goods and servlces. Cver Lhe nexL few years, whlle Lhe recovery from Lhe 20072009 recesslon remalns 23
lncompleLe and slack remalns ln Lhe economy, Lhls lncrease ln demand wlll boosL overall employmenL and economlc acLlvlLy.
ln deLall, when a SLaLe elecLs Lo expand lLs Medlcald program, Lhe lederal governmenL flnances addlLlonal paymenLs Lo medlcal provlders ln Lhe SLaLe ln exchange for provldlng medlcal servlces Lo Lhe new Medlcald enrollees. 1hese addlLlonal Medlcald ouLlays are only parLlally offseL by reduced lederal spendlng on premlum Lax credlLs and cosLsharlng asslsLance for lndlvlduals ln LhaL SLaLe wlLh lncomes beLween 100 and 138 percenL of Lhe lL who swlLch from recelvlng coverage Lhrough Lhe MarkeLplaces Lo recelvlng coverage Lhrough Medlcald.
CLA has used daLa from Lhe Congresslonal 8udgeL Cfflce and urban lnsLlLuLe daLa Lo esLlmaLe Lhe addlLlonal lederal ouLlays each SLaLe would have Lrlggered lf lL had expanded Medlcald by !anuary 1, 2014, Lhe deLalled meLhodology ls presenLed ln Appendlx 8. Cn Lhe basls of Lhls meLhodology, CLA esLlmaLes LhaL lf Lhe 24 SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald had done so as of !anuary 1, 2014, LhaL would have Lrlggered an lncrease ln lederal ouLlays ln Lhose SLaLes LoLallng $88 bllllon durlng calendar years 2014 Lhrough 2016. SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald wlll generaLe addlLlonal lederal ouLlays of $84 bllllon durlng Lhls perlod. SLaLebySLaLe esLlmaLes of Lhe addlLlonal lederal ouLlays resulLlng from each SLaLe's declslon Lo expand Medlcald are reporLed ln 1able 3. 11
ln order Lo quanLlfy Lhe effecLs of Lhese addlLlonal lederal ouLlays on SLaLes' economles and Lhe economy of Lhe naLlon as a whole, CLA has underLaken a sLandard flscal mulLlpller" analysls. ln brlef, when Lhe governmenL purchases addlLlonal goods and servlces, LhaL spurs hlrlng and purchases of lnvesLmenL goods and raw maLerlals Lo produce Lhose goods and servlces. As Lhose newlyhlred workers and producers spend Lhe lncome Lhey have earned, Lhey spur addlLlonal hlrlng and purchases, whlch ln Lurn seLs off yeL anoLher round of lncreases ln spendlng, and so on. LconomlsLs summarlze Lhls sequence of macroeconomlc effecLs vla a flscal mulLlpller," whlch measures Lhe LoLal number of dollars of addlLlonal economlc acLlvlLy arlslng from a one dollar flscal change. 1he 2014 F3'('$%3 B*+')9 '4 9/* G)*2%.*(9 provldes a deLalled dlscusslon of Lhe LheoreLlcal basls for Lhls Lype of analysls and Lhe emplrlcal llLeraLure underlylng CLA's esLlmaLes of Lhe mulLlpller for dlfferenL Lypes of flscal changes (CLA 2014). As descrlbed Lhereln, CLA's mulLlpller esLlmaLes fall well wlLhln Lhe range of esLlmaLes used by oLher analysLs, lncludlng Lhe Congresslonal 8udgeL Cfflce.
1he approprlaLe mulLlpller Lo use for evaluaLlng Lhe macroeconomlc consequences of SLaLes' Medlcald expanslon declslons depends on how Lhe addlLlonal lederal ouLlays Lrlggered by SLaLes' declslons enLer SLaLe economles. ln pracLlce, Lhese ouLlays wlll Lake Lhree maln paLhs:
H..%9%'(0& -9%&%I09%'( '4 $*.%30& 30)*"
11 noLe LhaL, whlle Lhls analysls focuses on calendar years Lhrough 2016 because Lhese are mosL relevanL for quanLlfylng Lhe shorLrun macroeconomlc lmpacLs, generous lederal supporL for SLaLes LhaL elecL Lo expand Medlcald would conLlnue ln subsequenL years. Lxpandlng Medlcald would Lhus remaln an aLLracLlve proposlLlon for SLaLes slnce Lhey could conLlnue Lo reallze Lhe dlrecL beneflLs of expanded coverage aL llmlLed cosL, even Lhough SLaLes' declslons would no longer boosL overall economlc ouLpuL. 26
ConslsLenL wlLh Lhe evldence descrlbed earller ln Lhls reporL, much of Lhe addlLlonal lederal fundlng wlll fund addlLlonal medlcal care for newly enrolled Medlcald enrollees, lncreaslng overall demand for medlcal goods and servlces. lor dollars enLerlng Lhe economy Lhls way, CLA uses a Cu mulLlpller of 1.3, conslsLenL wlLh CLA's esLlmaLe of Lhe mulLlpller for dlrecL governmenL spendlng.
J',*) '-9'4+'3?*9 $*.%30& 3'292"
Also conslsLenL wlLh Lhe evldence presenLed earller ln Lhls reporL, some of Lhe addlLlonal lederal fundlng wlll proLecL enrollees from hlgh ouLofpockeL medlcal cosLs, permlLLlng famllles Lo redlrecL dollars Lo oLher presslng needs and boosLlng demand for a wlde varleLy of goods and servlces. 12 lor dollars enLerlng Lhe economy Lhls way, CLA uses a Cu mulLlpller of 1.3, conslsLenL wlLh CLA's esLlmaLe of Lhe mulLlpller for paymenLs Lo lowlncome households.
B*.-39%'(2 %( -(3'$+*(209*. 30)*"
1he remalnder of Lhe addlLlonal lederal fundlng wlll compensaLe provlders for Lhe cosL of provldlng care LhaL prevlously wenL unrelmbursed. ln Lurn, Lhose funds wlll flow Lhrough Lo Lhe enLlLles LhaL were prevlously bearlng Lhe cosL of LhaL uncompensaLed care, some comblnaLlon of SLaLe and local governmenLs, prlvaLelylnsured lndlvlduals, and medlcal provlders. 13 1hose addlLlonal funds wlll permlL Lhose enLlLles Lo lncrease Lhelr demand for goods and servlces (or, ln Lhe case of governmenLs, reduce Laxes on households, lncreaslng households' demand for goods and servlces).
lor reducLlons ln uncompensaLed care cosLs borne by SLaLe and local governmenLs, CLA uses a mulLlpller of 1.1, conslsLenL wlLh CLA's esLlmaLe of Lhe mulLlpller for paymenLs Lo SLaLe and local governmenLs. lor oLher reducLlons ln uncompensaLed care cosLs, CLA uses a Cu mulLlpller of 0.8, conslsLenL wlLh CLA's esLlmaLe of Lhe mulLlpller appllcable Lo lndlvldual Lax cuLs.
12 8educLlons ln famllles' exposure Lo ouLofpockeL medlcal cosLs could boosL currenL demand for goods and servlces Lhrough anoLher channel by causlng famllles Lo draw down precauLlonary savlngs" LhaL Lhey have prevlously used Lo self lnsure" agalnsL medlcal rlsk. ln Lhe slmplesL models, reducLlons ln precauLlonary savlng lmprove economlc efflclency even ln Lhe long run slnce precauLlonary savlng represenLs a hlghcosL way of proLecLlng agalnsL rlsk, alLhough more compllcaLed models can lead Lo dlfferenL concluslons. Cruber and ?elowlLz (1999) provlde some evldence LhaL pasL Medlcald expanslons have lndeed reduced precauLlonary savlng. 8ecause Lhe macroeconomlc esLlmaLes presenLed ln Lhls reporL do noL accounL for effecLs of Medlcald expanslons on precauLlonary savlng, Lhey are somewhaL conservaLlve. 13 1he lederal governmenL ls sharlng ln reducLlons ln uncompensaLed care cosLs under Lhe Affordable Care AcL Lhrough sLaLuLory reducLlons ln dlsproporLlonaLe share hosplLal (uSP) paymenLs made vla Lhe Medlcald and Medlcare programs. 1he reducLlons occur regardless of SLaLe declslons Lo expand Medlcald, so Lhey are noL relevanL Lo Lhe macroeconomlc analysls underLaken here. 27
8ased on recenL esLlmaLes of per caplLa uncompensaLed care cosLs among Lhe unlnsured (Coughlln eL al., 2013), a reasonable esLlmaLe ls LhaL around 30 percenL of Lhe addlLlonal Medlcald spendlng wlll defray uncompensaLed care cosLs. 14 Whlle, ln pracLlce, SLaLe and local governmenLs are llkely Lo reallze a slgnlflcanL fracLlon of Lhese savlngs, ln Lhe lnLeresL of belng conservaLlve, CLA has assumed LhaL Lhese savlngs accrue enLlrely Lo provlders and oLher payers, whlch leads Lo a composlLe mulLlpller of 1.29 for each addlLlonal dollar of lederal ouLlays resulLlng from a SLaLe's declslon Lo expand Medlcald. 1he magnlLude of Lhls composlLe mulLlpller ls noL parLlcularly senslLlve Lo alLernaLlve assumpLlons abouL Lhe exLenL Lo whlch expandlng Medlcald defrays uncompensaLed care cosLs versus enLerlng Lhe economy Lhrough oLher channels.
1o generaLe esLlmaLes of Lhe macroeconomlc effecL of SLaLe Medlcald expanslon declslons, Lhe esLlmaLed flscal effecLs of SLaLe declslons Lo expand Medlcald and Lhe mulLlpller esLlmaLes descrlbed above were used as lnpuLs lnLo Lhe CLA mulLlpller model, whlch has been descrlbed ln prevlous CLA publlcaLlons (CLA 2014). 1he CLA model Lhen produces quarLerly esLlmaLes of Lhe effecL of SLaLes' declslons abouL wheLher Lo expand Medlcald on employmenL and overall economlc acLlvlLy. 13
1he esLlmaLes generaLed by Lhe CLA mulLlpller model assume LhaL, as ls Lhe case now, Lhere ls slack ln Lhe economy and producLlve resources are noL fully employed. 16 When Lhe economy reLurns Lo full employmenL, Lhese demandslde effecLs wlll become much smaller and evenLually dlsappear enLlrely because an lncrease ln labor demand ln one secLor wlll mosLly Lend Lo reallocaLe workers away from oLher secLors. Looklng forward, Lhe lederal 8eserve and many prlvaLe forecasLers expecL Lhe economy Lo remaln shorL of full employmenL unLll laLe 2016. lor Lhe purposes of Lhls analysls, Lhe CLA assumes LhaL lederal ouLlays spurred by SLaLes' Medlcald expanslon declslons wlll have Lhelr full macroeconomlc effecLs Lhrough Lhe mlddle of 2013 and LhaL Lhese effecLs phase down gradually LhereafLer, reachlng zero by Lhe beglnnlng of 2017. Whlle Lhls approach ls somewhaL ad hoc, lL llkely provldes a reasonable approxlmaLlon of Lhe acLual effecLs.
14 1hls esLlmaLe ls broadly conslsLenL wlLh uncompensaLed care esLlmaLes produced by PlSM, Lhe source for Lhe coverage esLlmaLes used elsewhere ln Lhls reporL. 1he PlSM esLlmaLes lmply LhaL SLaLe declslons Lo expand Medlcald wlll reduce overall uncompensaLed care cosLs by $183 bllllon over Len years, whlch ls 28 percenL of Lhe $643 bllllon lncrease ln neL lederal ouLlays lf all SLaLes expand Lhe program LhaL was esLlmaLed by PlSM (Polahan eL al. 2012). 1o Lhe exLenL LhaL reducLlons ln uncompensaLed care represenL a smaller share of Lhe addlLlonal ouLlays, Lhe macroeconomlc effecLs of SLaLe declslons Lo expand Medlcald would be commensuraLely larger. 13 1he esLlmaLes produced by Lhls model reflecL Lhe naLlonal effecLs on employmenL and economlc acLlvlLy resulLlng from each SLaLe's declslon Lo expand Medlcald. Whlle Lhe beneflLs of each SLaLe's declslon are llkely Lo fall dlsproporLlonaLely ln LhaL SLaLe, because SLaLes are economlcally lnLerconnecLed, some of Lhose beneflLs wlll accrue Lo oLher SLaLes. lor example, Callfornla has llkely reallzed some economlc beneflLs from Arlzona's declslon Lo expand Lhe program and vlce versa. SLaLes' declslons Lo expand Medlcald are, Lhus, lmporLanL for Lhe naLlon as a whole, noL [usL Lhe SLaLes maklng Lhose declslons. 16 8ecause all of Lhe SLaLebySLaLe esLlmaLes use Lhe same naLlonal mulLlpller model, Lhese esLlmaLes do noL accounL for dlfference ln Lhe exLenL Lo whlch Lhere ls slack ln parLlcular SLaLe labor markeLs. ln general, Lhls means LhaL Lhe [ob creaLlon effecLs of SLaLes' Medlcald expanslon declslons may be larger (and longerlasLlng) ln SLaLes wlLh weaker labor markeLs and smaller (and shorLerllved) ln SLaLes wlLh sLronger labor markeLs. 28
SLaLebySLaLe esLlmaLes of Lhe effecL on employmenL and LoLal ouLpuL lf each SLaLe decldes Lo expand Medlcald are reporLed ln 1ables 3 and 6. llgure 8 summarlzes Lhe number of [obs LhaL SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Medlcald could have creaLed lf Lhey had expanded Lhe program as of !anuary 1, 2014, as well as Lhe galns LhaL wlll be achleved by SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Lhe program. llgure 9 maps Lhe cumulaLlve [obyears from 2014 Lhrough 2017 LhaL would have been creaLed lf each SLaLe had expanded Medlcald as of !anuary 1, 2014.
Whlle Lhls subsecLlon focuses on Lhe shorLrun macroeconomlc beneflLs of expanded lnsurance coverage, SLaLes' declslons Lo expand Medlcald could affecL employmenL and economlc acLlvlLy over Lhe longer run as well. PealLhler workers who are less flnanclally sLressed and ln beLLer menLal healLh may be more able Lo effecLlvely parLlclpaLe ln Lhe labor force and have hlgher producLlvlLy on Lhe [ob. Cn Lhe oLher hand, access Lo coverage Lhrough Medlcald would llkely cause some workers Lo reduce Lhelr labor supply, elLher because havlng Medlcald coverage ellmlnaLe Lhe need Lo work ln order Lo obLaln healLh lnsurance or because Medlcald causes lndlvlduals Lo choose Lo work less ln order Lo avold loslng access Lo Medlcald coverage. 17
8educLlons ln labor supply of Lhe laLLer klnd generally reduce economlc efflclency. ln conLrasL, reducLlons ln labor supply of Lhe former klnd can lmprove economlc efflclency lf Lhey permlL workers Lo choose Lo pursue a hlghervalue alLernaLlve acLlvlLy llke carlng for chlldren or oLher famlly members, pursulng addlLlonal educaLlon, or sLarLlng a buslness, some reducLlons ln Lhls caLegory are commonly descrlbed as reflecLlng reducLlons ln [ob" or employmenL lock."
1he evldence on Lhe neL effecLs of Medlcald on labor supply for populaLlons llke Lhose affecLed Lhe Affordable Care AcL's Medlcald expanslon ls mlxed. 1he hlghesLquallLy evldence comes from Lhe CPlL, whlch concluded LhaL Medlcald enrollmenL had small and sLaLlsLlcally lnslgnlflcanL effecLs on labor supply (8alcker eL al. 2013b). Some nonrandomlzed quaslexperlmenLal sLudles have, however, found LhaL Medlcald causes sLaLlsLlcally slgnlflcanL reducLlons ln labor supply. uague, ueLelre, and Lelnlnger (2014) sLudy an eplsode ln whlch a porLlon of Wlsconsln's Medlcald program was closed Lo new enrollmenL and conclude LhaL Medlcald enrollmenL drove modesL reducLlons ln labor supply. CarLhwalLe, Cross, and noLowldlgdo (2014) sLudy a largescale dlsenrollmenL from 1ennessee's 1ennCare program ln Lhe mld2000s and esLlmaLe much larger effecLs on labor supply. lL ls generally noL clear whaL porLlons of Lhese labor supply responses occur Lhrough channels LhaL lncrease, reduce, or do noL affecL economlc efflclency.
1he reasons why dlfferenL sLudles have reached wldely dlfferlng concluslons abouL Lhe effecL of Medlcald on labor supply ls noL well undersLood. 1he dlfferences could reflecL dlfferences ln Lhe populaLlons affecLed by Lhese dlfferenL pollcy changes or Lhe Llme perlod durlng whlch Lhose changes occurred. noLably, Lhe populaLlon sLudled by CarLhwalLe, Cross, and noLowldlgdo ls somewhaL hlgher lncome Lhan Lhe populaLlon affecLed by Lhe Affordable Care AcL's Medlcald expanslon. AnoLher posslblllLy ls LhaL Lhe dlfferences reflecL sLaLlsLlcal sampllng errors, because
17 CLher porLlons of Lhe Affordable Care AcL's coverage expanslon could drlve lncreases ln labor supply. lor example, for lndlvlduals who were ellglble for Medlcald before Lhe Affordable Care AcL, expanded Medlcald ellglblllLy and Lhe avallablllLy of MarkeLplace coverage means LhaL Lhey can now lncrease Lhelr labor supply wlLhouL worrylng LhaL Lhey wlll lose Lhelr healLh lnsurance coverage. 29
none of Lhe sLudles are able Lo measure effecLs on labor supply wlLh absoluLe preclslon (wlLh Lhe CarLhwalLe, Cross, and noLowldlgdo sLudy belng parLlcularly lmpreclse), lL would noL be surprlslng Lo see some dlsperslon ln Lhese esLlmaLes even lf all Lhe sLudles are measurlng Lhe same underlylng response. llnally, Lhe dlfferences could arlse because Lhe quaslexperlmenLal esLlmaLes are conLamlnaLed by unobserved dlfferences beLween Lhose who do and do noL enroll ln Medlcald LhaL Lhe auLhors are unable Lo fully conLrol for, ln whlch case Lhe experlmenLal resulL from Lhe CPlL would provlde Lhe only rellable esLlmaLe.
ln any case, labor supply responses are noL llkely Lo be parLlcularly relevanL Lo macroeconomlc ouLcomes durlng Lhe perlod examlned ln Lhls reporL. As long as slack remalns ln Lhe labor markeL and Lhere are more workers seeklng work Lhan Lhere are avallable [ob openlngs, a worker who reduces hls labor supply due Lo Lhe avallablllLy of Medlcald coverage wlll ofLen slmply be replaced by anoLher [obseeker (C8C 2014a). 1hus, any labor supply effecLs LhaL do exlsL are llkely Lo be subsLanLlally aLLenuaLed for Lhe nexL few years.
1hls reporL documenLs Lhe farreachlng beneflLs LhaL SLaLes LhaL have already expanded Medlcald under Lhe Affordable Care AcL wlll recelve, and Lhe beneflLs LhaL SLaLes LhaL have noL yeL expanded Lhe program could achleve lf Lhey elecLed Lo do so. ln parLlcular, Lhls analysls shows LhaL by expandlng Lhelr Medlcald programs, SLaLes can lmprove access Lo essenLlal medlcal care, reduce flnanclal hardshlp, lmprove Lhelr clLlzens' menLal healLh and wellbelng, and clalm bllllons of dollars ln lederal fundlng LhaL could boosL Lhelr economles Loday. 1he AdmlnlsLraLlon hopes LhaL more SLaLes wlll declde Lo Lake advanLage of Lhese opporLunlLles ln Lhe monLhs and years ahead and sLands ready Lo work wlLh SLaLes Lo make Lhese opporLunlLles a reallLy.
34
I/1/%/',/2
8alcker, kaLherlne, eL al. 2013. 1he Cregon LxperlmenL - Medlcald's LffecLs on Cllnlcal CuLcomes." K*, F(A&0(. L'-)(0& '4 <*.%3%(* 368, no. 18: 17131722. _____. 2013. 1he lmpacL of Medlcald on Labor lorce AcLlvlLy and rogram arLlclpaLlon: Lvldence from Lhe Cregon PealLh lnsurance LxperlmenL." Worklng aper 19347. Cambrldge, MA: naLlonal 8ureau of Lconomlc 8esearch. Card, uavld, Carlos uobkln, nlcole MaesLas. 2009. uoes Medlcare Save Llves?" D/* M-0)9*)&: L'-)(0& '4 F3'('$%32 124, no 2: 397636. (C8C) Congresslonal 8udgeL Cfflce. 2012a. LsLlmaLes for Lhe lnsurance Coverage rovlslons of Lhe Affordable Care AcL updaLed for Lhe 8ecenL Supreme CourL ueclslon." hLLp://www.cbo.gov/publlcaLlon/43472. _____. 2012b. updaLed 8udgeL ro[ecLlons: llscal ?ears 2012 Lo 2022." hLLp://www.cbo.gov/publlcaLlon/43119. _____. 2014a. 1he 8udgeL and Lconomlc CuLlook: 2014 Lo 2024." hLLp://www.cbo.gov/publlcaLlon/43010. _____. 2014b. updaLed LsLlmaLes of Lhe LffecLs of Lhe lnsurance Coverage rovlslons of Lhe Affordable Care AcL, Aprll 2014." hLLp://www.cbo.gov/publlcaLlon/43231. (CLA) Councll of Lconomlc Advlsers. 2014. Lconomlc 8eporL of Lhe resldenL." (CMS) CenLers for Medlcare and Medlcald Servlces. 2014. Medlcald & CPl: Aprll 2014 MonLhly AppllcaLlons, LllglblllLy ueLermlnaLlons, and LnrollmenL 8eporL." hLLp://www.medlcald.gov/AffordableCareAcL/MedlcaldMovlnglorward 2014/uownloads/Aprll2014LnrollmenL8eporL.pdf. Cohen 8oss, uonna, eL al. 2009. A loundaLlon for PealLh 8eform: llndlngs of a 30 SLaLe Survey of LllglblllLy 8ules, LnrollmenL and 8enewal rocedures, and CosLSharlng racLlces ln Medlcald and CPl for Chlldren and arenLs uurlng 2009, uaLa 1ables." hLLp://kalserfamllyfoundaLlon.flles.wordpress.com/2013/01/8028_L.pdf. Coughlln, 1eresa A., eL al. 2014. An LsLlmaLed $84.9 8llllon ln uncompensaLed Care Was rovlded ln 2013, ACA aymenL CuLs Could Challenge rovlders." ;*0&9/ H440%)2 33, no 3: 807814. Currle, !aneL and !onaLhan Cruber. 1996. PealLh lnsurance LllglblllLy, uLlllzaLlon of Medlcal Care, and Chlld PealLh." D/* M-0)9*)&: L'-)(0& '4 F3'('$%32 111, no 2: 431466. _____. 1994. Savlng 8ables: 1he Lfflcacy and CosL of 8ecenL Changes ln Lhe Medlcald LllglblllLy of regnanL Women." D/* L'-)(0& '4 G'&%9%30& F3'('$: 104, no 6: 12631296. uague, Laura, and 1homas ueLelre, and Llndsey Lelnlnger. 2014. 1he LffecL of ubllc lnsurance Coverage for Chlldless AdulLs on Labor Supply." Worklng aper 20111. Cambrldge, MA: naLlonal 8ureau of Lconomlc 8esearch. Llbner, ChrlsLlne, eL al. 2010. LsLabllshlng SLaLe PealLh lnsurance Lxchanges: lmpllcaLlons for PealLh lnsurance LnrollmenL, Spendlng, and Small 8uslnesses." hLLp://www.rand.org/conLenL/dam/rand/pubs/Lechnlcal_reporLs/2010/8Anu_18823.p df. 33
llnkelsLeln, Amy and 8obln McknlghL. 2008. WhaL dld Medlcare uo? 1he lnlLlal lmpacL of Medlcare on MorLallLy and CuL of ockeL Medlcal Spendlng." L'-)(0& '4 G-=&%3 F3'('$%32 92, no. 7: 16441668. llnkelsLeln, Amy, eL al. 2012. 1he Cregon PealLh lnsurance LxperlmenL: Lvldence from Lhe llrsL ?ear." D/* M-0)9*)&: L'-)(0& '4 F3'('$%32 127, no 3: 10371106. lrakL, AusLln. 2013a. My 8eply Lo !lm Manzl." hLLp://LhelncldenLaleconomlsL.com/wordpress/myreplyLo[lmmanzl/. ______. 2013b. 1he Cregon Medlcald SLudy and CholesLerol." hLLp://LhelncldenLaleconomlsL.com/wordpress/LheoregonmedlcaldsLudyand cholesLerol/. CarLhwalLe, Cralg, 1al Cross, and MaLLhew noLowldlgdo. 2014. ubllc PealLh lnsurance, Labor Supply, and LmploymenL Lock." M-0)9*)&: L'-)(0& '4 F3'('$%32 129, no. 2: 633696. Cruber, !onaLhan and Aaron ?elowlLz. 1999. ubllc PealLh lnsurance and rlvaLe Savlngs." L'-)(0& '4 G'&%9%30& F3'('$: 107, no. 6: 12491274. CuLLmacher lnsLlLuLe. 2014. Medlcald lamlly lannlng LllglblllLy Lxpanslons." hLLp://www.guLLmacher.org/sLaLecenLer/splbs/splb_SMlL.pdf. Cross, 1al and MaLLhew !. noLowldlgdo. 2011. PealLh lnsurance and Lhe consumer bankrupLcy declslon: Lvldence from expanslons of Medlcald." L'-)(0& '4 G-=&%3 F3'('$%32 93, no 78: 767778. Peberleln, MarLha eL al. 2013. CeLLlng lnLo Cear for 2014: llndlngs from a 30SLaLe Survey of LllglblllLy, LnrollmenL, 8enewal, and CosLsharlng ollcles ln Medlcald and CPl, 2012 2013." hLLp://kalserfamllyfoundaLlon.flles.wordpress.com/2013/03/8401.pdf. Polahan, !ohn, MaLLhew 8ueLLgens, SLan uorn. 2013. 1he CosL of noL Lxpandlng Medlcald." hLLp://kalserfamllyfoundaLlon.flles.wordpress.com/2013/07/8437LhecosLofnoL expandlngmedlcald4.pdf. Polahan, !ohn, eL al. 2012. 1he CosL and Coverage lmpllcaLlons of Lhe ACA Medlcald Lxpanslon: naLlonal and SLaLebySLaLe Analysls." hLLp://kalserfamllyfoundaLlon.flles.wordpress.com/2013/01/8384.pdf. Puang, LlberL S. and kenneLh llnegold. 2013. Seven Mllllon Amerlcans Llve ln Areas Where uemand for rlmary Care May Lxceed Supply by More Lhan 10 ercenL." ;*0&9/ H440%)2 32, no. 3: 614621. (kll) kalser lamlly loundaLlon. 2009. Lxpandlng PealLh Coverage for Lowlncome AdulLs: lllllng Lhe Caps ln Medlcald LllglblllLy." hLLp://kalserfamllyfoundaLlon.flles.wordpress.com/2013/01/7900.pdf. ______.2010. Lxpandlng Medlcald Lo Lowlncome Chlldless AdulLs under PealLh 8eform: key Lessons from SLaLe Lxperlences." hLLp://kalserfamllyfoundaLlon.flles.wordpress.com/2013/01/8087.pdf. kenney, Cenevleve M., eL al. 2012. CpLlng ln Lo Lhe Medlcald Lxpanslon under Lhe ACA: Who Are Lhe unlnsured AdulLs Who Could Caln Coverage?" hLLp://www.urban.org/uploadedul/412630opLlnglnmedlcald.pdf. kroenke, kurL, 8oberL L. SplLzer, !aneL 8.W. Wllllams. 2001. 1he PC9: valldlLy of a 8rlef uepresslon SeverlLy Measure." L'-)(0& '4 N*(*)0& O(9*)(0& <*.%3%(* 16, no. 9: 606613. Levy, Pelen and uavld MelLzer. 2008. 1he lmpacL of PealLh lnsurance on PealLh." H((-0& B*1%*, '4 G-=&%3 ;*0&9/ 29, 399409. 36
Long, Sharon k. eL al. 2014. Larly LsLlmaLes lndlcaLe 8apld lncrease ln PealLh lnsurance Coverage under Lhe ACA: A romlslng SLarL." hLLp://hrms.urban.org/brlefs/earlyesLlmaLeslndlcaLerapldlncrease.hLml. McWllllams, Mlchael !. eL al. 2007. use of PealLh Servlces by revlously unlnsured Medlcare 8eneflclarles." K*, F(A&0(. L'-)(0& '4 <*.%3%(* 337, no. 2: 143133. Meyer, 8ruce u. and Wherry, Laura 8. Savlng 1eens: uslng a ollcy ulsconLlnulLy Lo LsLlmaLe Lhe LffecLs of Medlcald LllglblllLy." Worklng aper 18309. Cambrldge, MA: naLlonal 8ureau of Lconomlc 8esearch. Mulllgan, Casey 8. 2013. 1he erlls of SlgnlflcanL MlsundersLandlngs ln LvaluaLlng Medlcald." D/* K*, P')? D%$*2. hLLp://moblle.nyLlmes.com/blogs/economlx/2013/06/26/LheperllsofslgnlflcanL mlsundersLandlngslnevaluaLlngmedlcald/. newhouse, !oseph . 1993. Q)** 4') H&&R J*22'(2 4)'$ 9/* BHKS ;*0&9/ O(2-)0(3* FE+*)%$*(9. Parvard unlverslLy ress. 8lchardson, Sam, Aaron Carroll, AusLln lrakL. 2013. More Medlcald SLudy ower CalculaLlons." hLLp://LhelncldenLaleconomlsL.com/wordpress/moremedlcaldsLudypower calculaLlonsourre[ecLedne[mleLLer/. 8uggles, SLeven, eL al. 2010. lnLegraLed ubllc use MlcrodaLa Serles: verslon 3.0 [Machlne readable daLabase]." Mlnneapolls: unlverslLy of MlnnesoLa. Sommers, 8en[amln u., kaLherlne 8alcker, and Arnold M. LpsLeln. 2012. MorLallLy and Access Lo Care among AdulLs afLer SLaLe Medlcald Lxpanslons." D/* K*, F(A&0(. L'-)(0& '4 <*.%3%(* 367, no. 11: 10231034. Sommers, 8en[amln u., Sharon k. Long, and kaLherlne 8alcker. 2014. Changes ln MorLallLy afLer MassachuseLLs PealLh Care 8eform: A CuaslLxperlmenLal SLudy." H((0&2 '4 O(9*)(0& <*.%3%(* 160, no. 9: 383393. Sonfleld, Adam, Casey Alrlch, and 8achel 8enson Cold. 2008. SLaLe CovernmenL lnnovaLlon ln Lhe ueslgn and lmplemenLaLlon of Medlcald lamlly lannlng Lxpanslons." hLLp://www.guLLmacher.org/pubs/2008/03/28/SLaLeMlLpracLlces.pdf. 1aubman, Sarah L., eL al. 2014. Medlcald lncreases LmergencyueparLmenL use: Lvldence from Cregon's PealLh lnsurance LxperlmenL." T3%*(3* 343: 263268. WlLLers, uan. 2014. unlnsured 8aLe urops More ln SLaLes Lmbraclng PealLh Law: Medlcald Lxpanslon, SLaLe Lxchanges Llnked Lo lasLer 8educLlon ln unlnsured 8aLe." hLLp://www.gallup.com/poll/168339/unlnsuredraLesdropsLaLesembraclnghealLh law.aspx.
Several of Lhe CPlL esLlmaLes of Lhe effecL of Medlcald on recelpL of prevenLlve care apply only Lo parLlcular age or gender subgroups. unforLunaLely, Lhe publlshed PlSM esLlmaLes of Lhe lncrease ln lnsurance coverage arlslng from SLaLes' declslons Lo expand Medlcald do noL deLall Lhe ages and genders of Lhe lndlvlduals who would galn coverage. 1o address Lhls lssue, CLA esLlmaLed Lhe share of new Medlcald enrollees who fall ln Lhe relevanL subgroups uslng Lhe Census 8ureau's Amerlcan CommunlLy Survey (ACS), a large household survey LhaL collecLs lnformaLlon on lncome, lnsurance sLaLus, sLaLe of resldence, and oLher relevanL famlly characLerlsLlcs. 18
ln deLall, Lhls was done ln Lwo sLeps. llrsL, CLA ldenLlfled lndlvlduals llkely Lo galn coverage Lhrough Medlcald lf Lhelr SLaLe expanded Lhe program uslng Lhe followlng crlLerla, namely, lndlvlduals who: (1) are adulLs age 19 Lo 64 wlLh famlly lncome under 138 percenL of Lhe lL, (2) were noL ellglble for Medlcald under preACA SLaLe Medlcald lncome ellglblllLy crlLerla, 19 (3) do noL reporL belng enrolled ln Medlcald, 20 and (4) do noL reporL belng enrolled ln employer sponsored coverage. Among LhaL group, lL ls sLralghLforward Lo esLlmaLe Lhe share of poLenLlal new enrollees falllng ln each agegender subgroup of lnLeresL. 1hese shares can Lhen be applled Lo Lhe SLaLelevel PlSM esLlmaLes Lo obLaln Lhe lncrease ln lnsurance ln each relevanL age gender subgroup as a resulL of each SLaLe's declslon Lo expand Medlcald.
ln lmplemenLlng Lhls approach, lncome ls deflned as LoLal cash lncome mlnus SupplemenLal SecurlLy lncome and meansLesLed cash asslsLance (e.g. 1emporary AsslsLance for needy lamllles), a deflnlLlon LhaL closely maLches modlfled ad[usLed gross lncome (MACl), Lhe lncome deflnlLlon used Lo assess ellglblllLy for Medlcald under Lhe Affordable Care AcL. uue Lo daLa llmlLaLlons, cerLaln oLher Lypes of lncome LhaL are noL lncluded ln MACl (e.g. chlld supporL) could noL be excluded from Lhe lncome measure used, buL any resulLlng blases are llkely Lo be small. lamllles unlLs were deflned uslng an algorlLhm for deflnlng healLh lnsurance unlLs" (Plus) developed by SLaLe PealLh Access uaLa AsslsLance CenLer (SPAuAC). A descrlpLlon of Lhls algorlLhm and programs for lmplemenLlng lL are avallable from Lhe SPAuAC webslLe. 21
lL ls lmporLanL Lo noLe LhaL Lhls approach has cerLaln llmlLaLlons. llrsL, Medlcald coverage ls only avallable Lo clLlzens and cerLaln legal resldenLs, and Lhls approach makes no aLLempL Lo accounL for Lhe facL LhaL Lhe ACS lncludes many lnellglble nonclLlzens. Second, Lhe meLhod used Lo model
18 1hls analysls uses Lhe luMSuSA preprocessed exLracLs of Lhe ACS for years 20102012 (8uggles eL al. 2010). 19 lnformaLlon on preACA ellglblllLy crlLerla are obLalned from varlous reporLs produced by Lhe kalser lamlly loundaLlon (Cohen 8oss, eL al. 2009, kll 2009, kll 2010). reACA ellglblllLy crlLerla as Lhose ln effecL ln 2009, Lhls approach ls conslsLenL wlLh PlSM, whlch also uses LreaLs preACA ellglblllLy crlLerla as Lhose ln effecL ln 2009 (Polahan eL al. 2012). 20 1hls provldes a crude way of excludlng lndlvlduals who were ellglble for Medlcald before Lhe Affordable Care AcL as a resulL vla more expanslve ellglblllLy crlLerla LhaL are appllcable only Lo speclflc groups, llke Lhose wlLh dlsablllLles. 1hese more deLalled ellglblllLy crlLerla are challenglng Lo model ln survey daLa. 21 See hLLp://www.shadac.org/publlcaLlons/deflnlngfamllysLudleshealLhlnsurancecoverage. 38
preACA Medlcald ellglblllLy rules ls somewhaL crude, and more sophlsLlcaLed meLhods mlghL glve beLLer resulLs. noLably, however, kenney eL al. (2012) handle boLh of Lhese lssues ln more sophlsLlcaLed ways and arrlve aL broadly slmllar esLlmaLes of Lhe share of poLenLlal new enrollees falllng ln speclfled age and gender groups. llnally, lndlvlduals' propenslLy Lo acLually enroll ln Medlcald coverage may dlffer across age and gender groups, falllng Lo accounL for Lhese dlfferlng enrollmenL propenslLles could cause Lhls approach Lo oversLaLe or undersLaLe Lhe number of lndlvlduals galnlng coverage ln each of Lhese groups.
1he mosL lmporLanL lnpuL lnLo analyzlng how SLaLe declslons Lo expand Medlcald affecL LoLal employmenL and overall economlc acLlvlLy ls how each SLaLe's declslon affecLs lederal ouLlays. CLA esLlmaLed Lhese amounLs ln Lwo sLeps. llrsL, esLlmaLes from Lhe Congresslonal 8udgeL Cfflce (C8C) were used Lo esLlmaLe Lhe LoLal change ln lederal ouLlays lf all sLaLes expanded Medlcald relaLlve Lo lf no sLaLes expanded Lhe program. Second, CLA dlsLrlbuLed LhaL naLlonal LoLal across SLaLes uslng PlSM esLlmaLes. 1hls appendlx descrlbes each sLep ln greaLer deLall.
locuslng flrsL on Lhe naLlonal LoLals, Lhe neL change ln lederal ouLlays lf all sLaLes elecL Lo expand Medlcald conslsLs of Lwo componenLs: (1) an lncrease ln lederal ouLlays reflecLlng addlLlonal spendlng on Medlcald coverage, and (2) a reducLlon ln lederal cosLs Lo provlde premlum Lax credlLs and cosLsharlng asslsLance. 1he second, offseLLlng, componenL reflecLs Lhe facL LhaL some lndlvlduals ln famllles wlLh lncomes beLween 100 and 138 percenL of Lhe lL wlll recelve coverage Lhrough Medlcald lf Lhelr SLaLe does expand Lhe program and would lnsLead obLaln coverage Lhrough Lhe MarkeLplace lf Lhelr sLaLes does noL expand Medlcald. CLA used C8C esLlmaLes Lo esLlmaLe Lhe slze of each of Lhese Lwo componenLs ln a scenarlo ln whlch all SLaLes expanded Medlcald, relaLlve Lo a scenarlo ln whlch no SLaLes expanded Medlcald.
1o esLlmaLe Lhe dlrecL effecL on lederal Medlcald ouLlays, Lhe sLarLlng polnL was C8C's March 2012 esLlmaLes of Lhe effecL of Lhe Affordable Care AcL's coverage expanslon on lederal Medlcald spendlng (C8C 2012a). 8ecause Lhese esLlmaLes predaLe Lhe Supreme CourL's declslon ln KQOU 1" T*=*&%-2, Lhey lmpllclLly reflecL Lhe lncrease ln lederal Medlcald ouLlays lf all SLaLes expand Lhe program. 22 CLA Lhen ad[usLed Lhese amounLs Lo reflecL changes ln C8C's assumpLlons regardlng perenrollee Medlcald cosLs from C8C's March 2012 basellne Lo lLs Aprll 2014 basellne (C8C 2014b). 23
1o esLlmaLe Lhe offseLLlng savlngs on premlum Lax credlLs and cosLsharlng asslsLance, CLA used C8C's esLlmaLe of how Lhe Supreme CourL's declslon ln KQOU 1" T*=*&%-2 affecLed Lhe cosLs of Lhese programs (C8C 2012b). C8C esLlmaLed LhaL Lhe Supreme CourL declslon caused a $28 bllllon lncrease ln MarkeLplace subsldy cosLs ln flscal year 2022. C8C also lndlcaLed LhaL Lhey assumed LhaL LwoLhlrds of Lhe overall expanslon populaLlon would llve ln SLaLes LhaL decllned Lo expand Lhe Medlcald program for lndlvlduals beLween 100 and 138 percenL of Lhe lL. 1hls esLlmaLe lmplles LhaL, lf all SLaLes decllned Lo expand Lhe program, Lhe reducLlon ln premlum Lax
22 ln prlnclple, Lhese esLlmaLes also lnclude lederal spendlng assoclaLed wlLh prevlously ellglble lndlvlduals who would newly enroll ln Medlcald even lf Lhelr SLaLe falled Lo expand Lhe program, perhaps due Lo enhanced ouLreach assoclaLed wlLh Lhe MarkeLplaces. ln pracLlce, Lhe number of such lndlvlduals ls llkely Lo be relaLlvely small, so lncludlng Lhem ls unllkely Lo slgnlflcanLly affecL Lhe resulLs of Lhls analysls. 23 Speclflcally, CLA used Lhe percenL change ln C8C's pro[ecLlon of perenrollee cosLs for chlldren. Whlle cosL Lrends for chlldren may dlffer sllghLly from Lhose for adulLs, Lhe changes ln C8C's reporLed perenrollee cosLs for adulLs lncorporaLe changes ln Lhe composlLlon of Lhe Medlcald populaLlon caused by changes ln SLaLes' declslons abouL wheLher or noL Lo expand Medlcald. As such, Lhey cannoL be used Lo ad[usL for changes ln underlylng per enrollee cosLs across dlfferenL vlnLages of C8C's pro[ecLlons. 40
credlL and cosLsharlng asslsLance cosLs would be 30 percenL larger Lhan Lhe $28 bllllon referenced above, so CLA scaled up Lhe $28 bllllon esLlmaLe accordlngly. CLA Lhen pro[ecLed Lhls flscal year 2022 esLlmaLe back Lo Lhe presenL by assumlng lL would grow ln proporLlon Lo LoLal MarkeLplace subsldy cosLs reporLed ln C8C's March 2012 basellne. llnally, slmllar Lo Lhe Medlcald esLlmaLes, Lhe resulLlng sLream of cosLs was ad[usLed for changes ln perenrollee subsldy cosLs from C8C's March 2012 basellne Lo lLs Aprll 2014 basellne. 24,23
1o dlsLrlbuLe Lhese naLlonal amounLs across sLaLes, CLA relled upon esLlmaLes from Lhe urban lnsLlLuLe's PlSM (descrlbed ln Lhe maln LexL). Speclflcally, lncremenLal Medlcald ouLlays were dlsLrlbuLed across SLaLes uslng PlSM's SLaLebySLaLe esLlmaLes of Lhe lncremenLal Medlcald ouLlays ln 2016 lf each SLaLe elecLs Lo expand coverage. 1he offseLLlng savlngs on premlum Lax credlLs and cosLsharlng asslsLance were dlsLrlbuLed uslng Lhe SLaLespeclflc dlfference beLween Lhe lncrease ln Medlcald enrollmenL and Lhe lncrease ln overall lnsurance coverage LhaL occurs lf LhaL SLaLe expends Medlcald (once agaln, uslng esLlmaLes for 2016), Lhls dlfference approxlmaLes Lhe number of lndlvlduals who would swlLch from recelvlng coverage Lhrough Lhe MarkeLplace Lo recelvlng coverage Lhrough Medlcald lf Lhe SLaLe expanded Medlcald. 26
As a flnal noLe, for Lhe purposes of uslng Lhese esLlmaLes wlLh Lhe CLA mulLlpller model, lL ls necessary Lo converL Lhe flscal year esLlmaLes LhaL resulL from Lhe meLhodology descrlbed above Lo quarLerly esLlmaLes. ln dolng so, CLA assumed LhaL Medlcald and MarkeLplace ouLlays occurrlng durlng flscal year 2014 wlll occur smooLhly over Lhe flnal Lhree quarLers of Lhe flscal year (conslsLenL wlLh Lhe facL LhaL Lhe maln coverage expanslons under Lhe Affordable Care AcL Look effecL on !anuary 1, 2014). ln subsequenL flscal years, CLA assumed LhaL ouLlays occurred smooLhly over Lhe flscal year. Whlle Lhe acLual Llme paLh of Lhese ouLlays llkely dlffers sllghLly from Lhls assumed paLh, any error ln he assumed paLh ls llkely Lo have very small effecLs on Lhe overall concluslon of Lhls analysls.
24 C8C's perenrollee subsldy esLlmaLes are for calendar years, whlle Lhe ouLlay esLlmaLes are for flscal years. ln maklng Lhls ad[usLmenL, CLA used an approprlaLe blend of Lhe calendar year perenrollee esLlmaLes Lo ad[usL each flscal year esLlmaLe. 23 1he overall change ln perenrollee subsldy cosLs from C8C's March 2012 basellne Lo lLs Aprll 2014 basellne may dlffer from Lhe change ln perenrollee cosLs for a glven enrollee wlLh lncome beLween 100 and 138 percenL of lL, for several reasons. llrsL, premlum Lax credlL covers a larger share of Lhe LoLal premlum for Lhls group Lhan for Lhe average enrollee, and Lhese lndlvlduals recelve cosLsharlng asslsLance, unllke some hlgherlncome enrollees. ln addlLlon, some of Lhe change ln perenrollee cosLs from C8C's March 2012 basellne Lo lLs Aprll 2014 basellne may reflecL composlLlonal changes lf lndlvlduals who were swlLched from Medlcald Lo Lhe MarkeLplaces by Lhe Supreme CourL ueclslon dlffer from Lhe Lyplcal MarkeLplace enrollee. 1he effecL of Lhese lmperfecLlons on Lhe overall resulLs of Lhls analysls are llkely Lo be qulLe small. 26 1hls dlfference may also reflecL some offseLLlng reducLlon ln Lhe number of lndlvlduals enrolled ln employer coverage, buL lL appears LhaL Lhe reducLlon ln MarkeLplace coverage ls Lhe prlmary componenL. ln any case, Lhe SLaLelevel ouLlay esLlmaLes are relaLlvely lnsenslLlve Lo Lhe preclse meLhod used Lo dlsLrlbuLe Lhe offseLLlng Lax credlL and cosLsharlng asslsLance cosLs.