Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

Philosophy of Mind in AI

Reader & student notes kopen!


Tegen volgende week: paper over Turing in reader lezen.
The multiple realization argument: (tegen type-physicolism van vorige les)
Non-human animals have brains very different then ours, do they have C-fibers and then
do they feel pain? We assume they feel pain. Maybe they have some other structure (not
C-fibers) that detects tissue damage, so maybe they just feel pain differently. A type-
physicolist would have a problem because pain comes from C-fibers.
Why stop at animals, why not AI systems? Why dont we suppose mental states are
implemented in machines ? Is it crazy to suppose these machines could have mental states ?
The idea of mental state (bv. Pain) is multiple realizable. It is realizable in a lot of beings. But
this does not necessary comes from a physical thing (C-fibers).
Pain can not be a neural/physic state!
Behaviorism
19(eind)-20(begin) eeuw.
Grew out of the critism of theories like dualism, mentalism (the attempt to put mental states in a
protected categorie = something that is true on its own).
Begin 20 century very popular theory: Logical positivism (wanted philosophy like science) = Vienna
circle philosophers.
The scientific method (the reason they thought physics and stuff was so popular) : they idea of
testing hypotheses by observation & experiments. Philosophers had meetings in Vienna to discuss
how philosophy and science could come together.
They would start with the idea that propositions (a sentence that is true or false) in order to be
true or false they must be cognitively meaningful. This came down to observability, confirmibility,
falsifiability,
Propositions that did not have this property would be pseudo-propositions. Take about God, were
not meaningful propositions.
When can we say that a proposition is meaningful ? -> if it is verifiable by observation, determing
whether it is true or false. But not everything can immediately be observed, but they have to be in
principle verifiable by observation. Verification principle
Bv. There is intelligent life in outer space -> meaningful + in principle in de toekomst observable.
Watson founding father of behaviorism. True phycology has to do with this verification principle.
How can we study feelings, believes, desires, if we can not observe them ? How can we make
meaningful observations?
Bv. Mental state: Belief. Beliefs are mental objects. Suppose I see you leaving your house with an
umbrella and I hear you say I think it is gonna rain today , now I know you have the belief that it is
gonna rain. Do I observe this belief? No I observe what you wair, say, I do not observe the belief
itself. -> Behavior is observable!
If you wanna study these mental state we have to place the domain of study somewhere else, to the
behavior. -> alle mental terms refer to behavior, we can reduce the one to the other, one becomes
obsolete!
Remark: You could say propositions about feelings, are meaningless. They arent verifiable (only
trough observation of behavior).
Mind-body problem here: the problem is not a real problem -> pseudo problem! There is no
distinction. This whole problem is a confusion of the terms when we talk about the mind and body.
The mind is just something we say instead of a complex array of behaviors. The mental states
(believes, pain,) are just a subset of this array and the relation.
Verification is not necessary finit. The belief that is gonna rain today can be translated to carry an
umbrella or wearing a rain coat or saying that is gonna rain or .. can go on and on!
A reason why some people say this theory collapses under its own weight.
Functionalism
1967 H.Putnam published a paper physiological predicates, it changed the debate of the mind-
body problem. First it critisized the mind/brain identification, the type- . Second it stated the
functionalism. Third it helped to install antireductionism.
Everything arises from a single idea: the multiple realisabilty of mental properties.
New conception of the mental.
M.R. and the functional conception of the mind.
Bv. Believe in angels (immaterial and have a mental life). They do not exist but we do have a
concept of them. There is nothing conceptual possible about them.
...
-> The physical realization principle. If an entity x has a mental property m (a certain mental
state) at a certain moment in time t, then x is a material thing and then x has a certain
physical property p that realizes m in x at moment t.
Only physical systems realize mental properties!
This principle also requires that every mental property is physical-based. Minds are always
embodied minds.
In humans it is C-fibers that realizes pain but in other organisms it might be something
different. Other beings like animals, AI system, aliens,
Artifacts:
Bv (nt psychology). Engine. The word is not clear about how it does it (benzene, oil, ) but it
is clear what it does. Its job description is clear.
Bv. Pain. Job description: tissue damage detection. But species could have other ways of
doing this.
When we talk about the mind in term of computers, the job description of the mind is
computing. The computational view of the mind is a popular saying.
. (FF niet aan het opletten, ok heel lang)

S-ar putea să vă placă și