Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Transfer of Personnel Offshore by Use of S7000 Workboat
Avoidance if Possible
Consider Potential Alternative Personnel Transfer Methods
Review of Personnel Transfer Procedure
Review of JSA & TBT Relative to Personnel Transfer
Review of Emergency Response Procedures and Drills
Familiarisation of S7000 Crew, Safety/Standby Vessel and
Towing/Assisting tug onboard Management
SaipemBU Offshore
S7000 Fatality 15 April 11 Presentation
20
PRESENTATION OF S7000 FATALITY 15
TH
APRIL 2011
CURRENT STATUS OF INVESTIGATION MAY 2011
20
1. Assessment to Avoid Transfer of Personnel Offshore by Use of
S7000 Workboat.
Questions:
a) I s it possible for every eventuality?
b) Are we reducing risk or transferring the risk?
c) Are we unnecessarily pre- empting the outcome of full accident
investigation?
d) I s there enough time to implement fully alternative methods and
measures including communication to relevant crew members?
Answers:
a) Yes it is.
b) Risk is being reduced to an ALARP situation using the proposed method.
c) In the circumstances and until completion of the investigation, it is not
unreasonable to avoid at least temporarily the use of S7000 workboat
transfer.
d) Yes there is adequate time provided a transfer method using existing
known technology is utilised.
SaipemBU Offshore
S7000 Fatality 15 April 11 Presentation
21
PRESENTATION OF S7000 FATALITY 15
TH
APRIL 2011
CURRENT STATUS OF INVESTIGATION MAY 2011
21
2. Consider Potential Alternative Personnel Transfer Methods
a) Can transfer of personnel be fully avoided?
- No, as release of seafastenings and attachment of lift rigging to
S7000 is always required
- For unmanned cargo barges it is not possible to place personnel
onboard inshore and leave on the cargo barge is not practicable and
may increase risk to personnel
b) Use of Ampelmann System ?
- Vessel to vessel transfer system has not been fully developed by
Ampelmann and necessary testing to satisfy Saipem and our Clients
- Needs to have a significant training plan to be arranged involving:
Ampelmann S7000 Personnel Tug Crew
- In conclusion Saipem believe this system has merit but requires to
be developed in conjunction with Ampelmann over a period of some
6-9 months
c) Use of other walk to work systems?
- All other walk-to-work systems do not have the capability to deal
with two differentially moving bodies and as such have been
excluded at this stage.
SaipemBU Offshore
S7000 Fatality 15 April 11 Presentation
22
PRESENTATION OF S7000 FATALITY 15
TH
APRIL 2011
CURRENT STATUS OF INVESTIGATION MAY 2011
22
2. Consider Potential Alternative Personnel Transfer Methods (Cont.)
d) Use of an Alternative Transfer Craft
- Availability and suitability of such a craft requires investigation over
a period of 3 months
- Deployment and recovery using existing system from S7000 requires
potential modification should craft be of different dimensions, weight
etc.
- Egress from craft onto boarding ladder of cargo barge including
ladder systems mounted on cargo barges
- Use of a safety/standby vessel in-field to ensure personnel can be
recovered quickly
- In conclusion, this method requires detailed investigation and a
period of 6-9 months is necessary
SaipemBU Offshore
S7000 Fatality 15 April 11 Presentation
23
PRESENTATION OF S7000 FATALITY 15
TH
APRIL 2011
CURRENT STATUS OF INVESTIGATION MAY 2011
23
2. Consider Potential Alternative Personnel Transfer Methods (Cont.)
e) Use of Personnel (ESVAGT) Basket Transfer with Contingency
Safety/Standby Vessel Transfer
- Procedures are in place and methodology is well known
- Each transfer allows only 4 persons per trip
- Onboard spreadsheet available and used to enable assessment of
motions to be made
- Contingency plan for recovery of personnel from cargo barge in the
event of shift working time being exceeded
- Make connection of stern towing tug via streaming line and buoy to
enable the tug/barge/tug configuration to be held in position for
personnel transfer
- In conclusion, this method offers the most time effective and robust
solution
SaipemBU Offshore
S7000 Fatality 15 April 11 Presentation
24
PRESENTATION OF S7000 FATALITY 15
TH
APRIL 2011
CURRENT STATUS OF INVESTIGATION MAY 2011
24
3. Review of Personnel Transfer Procedure
- The Personnel Transfer Procedure S7000-PRO-HSE-37-REV-02 has
been reviewed and as such it is deemed suitable for the transfer
method under item d).
The use of the motions spreadsheet for transfer will also be fully
implemented as part of the Go/No-go decision process.
SaipemBU Offshore
S7000 Fatality 15 April 11 Presentation
25
PRESENTATION OF S7000 FATALITY 15
TH
APRIL 2011
CURRENT STATUS OF INVESTIGATION MAY 2011
25
4. Review of JSA & TBT relative to Personnel Transfer
- In this instance a review has shown the Job Safe Analysis (JSA) and
Toolbox Talk (TBT) could be improved in terms of implementation of
further barriers once an error or failure has occurred.
As such the use of a Safety / Standby Vessel to ensure
personnel recovery will be implemented.
SaipemBU Offshore
S7000 Fatality 15 April 11 Presentation
26
PRESENTATION OF S7000 FATALITY 15
TH
APRIL 2011
CURRENT STATUS OF INVESTIGATION MAY 2011
26
5. Review of Emergency Response Procedures & Drills
- For the avoidance of doubt and whilst Saipem considers the Man
Overboard Procedure S7000-PRO-EMG-05-E to be fully sufficient, a
Safety / Standby Vessel will be used in-field to enhance the recovery
of personnel in an emergency. In addition a Drill will be conducted
in-field prior to ensure the Emergency Recovery System is fully
operational.
SaipemBU Offshore
S7000 Fatality 15 April 11 Presentation
27
PRESENTATION OF S7000 FATALITY 15
TH
APRIL 2011
CURRENT STATUS OF INVESTIGATION MAY 2011
27
6. Familiarisation of S7000 Crew, Safety/Standby Vessel and
Towing/Assisting tug onboard Management
- Upon the S7000 arrival in Stavanger a full briefing of the Vessel
Management and the relevant crew involved will take place. This will
also be recorded.