0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
51 vizualizări8 pagini
A solid majority of Minnesota voters (61%) oppose the core provision of the MFA, allowing tax collectors from other states to extend their enforcement reach in Minnesota. Moreover, the intensity of the opposition (39% strongly oppose) is high.
Titlu original
Minnesota Poll on online taxes from the National Taxpayers Union
A solid majority of Minnesota voters (61%) oppose the core provision of the MFA, allowing tax collectors from other states to extend their enforcement reach in Minnesota. Moreover, the intensity of the opposition (39% strongly oppose) is high.
A solid majority of Minnesota voters (61%) oppose the core provision of the MFA, allowing tax collectors from other states to extend their enforcement reach in Minnesota. Moreover, the intensity of the opposition (39% strongly oppose) is high.
12 '& 1$3 4#'$+#$' 5(-$% ,(6 7(3%8 Minnesota Statewide Survey: June 4-5, 2014 N= 400 Likely Minnesota Voters 70% landline, 30% cell phones Margin of Error 4.9 % MINNESOTA 2 4%%9$ :(;</+&9#= Supreme Court decisions prevent states from enforcing sales tax laws on retail businesses that do not have some physical presence in their state, such as a store or warehouse. In short, state sales tax enforcement officials are stopped at the state border. States have tried to overturn this limitation on out-of-state taxation for decades, claiming revenue losses from catalogs, retail, and most recently, e-commerce. Today, the nations largest retailers are working in cooperation with many state governments to push a federal law called the Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA) that ends this limitation on out-of-state sales tax collection. The MFA would grant the power to each state tax enforcement body to enforce its sales tax laws regardless of whether the business has any operations or employees in the state, wiping away borders as limits to state tax collection and enforcement power. Result would be every state gaining unprecedented new power to audit retail businesses anywhere in America, and drag businesses into their state courts, harming consumers and smaller businesses that use the Internet to engage in commerce. MINNESOTA 3 >$? 59+@$? A"#="#/% A solid majority of Minnesota voters (61%) oppose the core provision of the MFA, allowing tax collectors from other states to extend their enforcement reach in Minnesota. Moreover, the intensity of the opposition (39% strongly oppose) is high. This is not just an issue for Republicans and Conservatives. Minnesota voters of all political stripes, including majorities of Moderates, Liberals, Independents and Democrats, oppose expanding out-of-state sales tax collection on Gopher State e-merchants. At play are two issues, both of which have broad bi-partisan support in Minnesota: Out-of-state tax collectors should not be given new powers to reach into Minnesota and bring Minnesota e-merchants into state courts elsewhere in the country. The internet generally should remain as free of taxation and regulation as possible. A clear majority of Minnesota voters reject a national e-commerce sales tax collection mandate. MINNESOTA 4#'$#%$ (#= :+&(= &BB&%"C&# '& $DB&3$+"#/ &9'E&FE%'('$ '(6 ;&--$;'&+% &# !"##$%&'( &#-"#$ D$+;G(#'% 4 Proposed legislation would allow tax enforcement agents from one state to collect taxes from online retailers based in a different state. For instance, if a customer in New York makes an internet purchase from a retailer in Minnesota, the state of New York may make that retailer collect New York sales tax and send it to New York! Knowing this, do you favor or oppose federal legislation that changes how states collect sales tax from internet purchases? (IF CHOICE MADE, ASK) Do you strongly (favor/oppose) this, or just somewhat (favor/oppose) it? HIJ HKJ IIJ LMJ HIJ 5'+&#/-? A(@&+ 5&D$3G(' A(@&+ 5&D$3G(' 2BB&%$ 5'+&#/-? 2BB&%$ N#%9+$ A ( @ & +
2 B B & % $
!"#$%&'()* ,*-.//0 HM OH 1*2"#"*2"*3 ,*-.4.0 LP QI 5"67(8)3 ,*-.9:0 LL KI ;7*<"8=)>=" ,*-.?40 HO OR @72"8)3" ,*-.4A0 LO KP B'%"8)& ,*-.490 LO KL C8"DE F*&'*" GH7##"8 ,*-.IA0 IQ QR 1*J8"DE F*&'*" GH7##"8 ,*-K/?0 IM KS FAVOR: 27% OPPOSE: 61% MINNESOTA !"##$%&'(#% T+D-? +$U$;' ( #(C&#(- $E;&DD$+;$ %(-$% '(6 D(#=('$ 5 The proposed legislation would create a new national sales tax collection mandate that applies to every retailer who sells goods and services over the internet! With this in mind, do you favor or oppose this legislation? (IF CHOICE MADE, ASK) Do you strongly (favor/oppose) this, or just somewhat (favor/oppose) it? HHJ HSJ IPJ LSJ HLJ 5'+&#/-? A(@&+ 5&D$3G(' A(@&+ 5&D$3G(' 2BB&%$ 5'+&#/-? 2BB&%$ N#%9+$ A ( @ & +
2 B B & % $
!"#$%&'()* ,*-.//0 HM OP 1*2"#"*2"*3 ,*-.4.0 LH QP 5"67(8)3 ,*-.9:0 LO RS ;7*<"8=)>=" ,*-.?40 HS OP @72"8)3" ,*-.4A0 LM KP B'%"8)& ,*-.490 LM RM C8"DE F*&'*" GH7##"8 ,*-.IA0 IQ QI 1*J8"DE F*&'*" GH7##"8 ,*-K/?0 LI KK FAVOR: 29% OPPOSE: 57% MINNESOTA 5'+&#/ (/+$$D$#' $E;&DD$+;$ %G&9-= +$D("# (% F+$$ F+&D +$/9-(C&# V '(6(C&# (% B&%%":-$ 6 Thinking a little more about shopping online, or e-commerce... Please tell me if you agree or disagree with the following statements. The first/next one is The internet should remain as free from government regulation and taxation as possible. (IF CHOICE MADE, ASK) Do you strongly (agree/disagree) with it, or just somewhat (agree/disagree) with it? RSJ IHJ HLJ HLJ QJ 5'+&#/-? W/+$$ 5&D$3G(' W/+$$ 5&D$3G(' X"%(/+$$ 5'+&#/-? X"%(/+$$ N#%9+$ W / + $ $
X " % ( / + $ $
!"#$%&'()* ,*-.//0 OS HQ 1*2"#"*2"*3 ,*-.4.0 QO IO 5"67(8)3 ,*-.9:0 QH LR ;7*<"8=)>=" ,*-.?40 OM HO @72"8)3" ,*-.4A0 QL LL B'%"8)& ,*-.490 QL LH C8"DE F*&'*" GH7##"8 ,*-.IA0 OR II 1*J8"DE F*&'*" GH7##"8 ,*-K/?0 QQ IM AGREE: 69% DISAGREE: 26% MINNESOTA !"##$%&'( @&'$+% =&#Y' 3(#' !"##$%&'( $ED$+;G(#'% %9:U$;' '& $#F&+;$D$#' F+&D &9'E&FE%'('$ '(6 ;&--$;'&+% 7 Thinking a little more about shopping online, or e-commerce... Please tell me if you agree or disagree with the following statements. The first/next one is Out-of-state tax collectors, such as those from the State of New York, should not gain new power to audit and take into New York courts, online retailers who operate from Minnesota. (IF CHOICE MADE, ASK) Do you strongly (agree/disagree) with it, or just somewhat (agree/disagree) with it? LRJ IKJ HKJ HIJ HRJ 5'+&#/-? W/+$$ 5&D$3G(' W/+$$ 5&D$3G(' X"%(/+$$ 5'+&#/-? X"%(/+$$ N#%9+$ W / + $ $
X " % ( / + $ $
!"#$%&'()* ,*-.//0 QO II 1*2"#"*2"*3 ,*-.4.0 KM IS 5"67(8)3 ,*-.9:0 KI LR ;7*<"8=)>=" ,*-.?40 QO IR @72"8)3" ,*-.4A0 QP IL B'%"8)& ,*-.490 RM LM C8"DE F*&'*" GH7##"8 ,*-.IA0 QM II 1*J8"DE F*&'*" GH7##"8 ,*-K/?0 KL LH AGREE: 59% DISAGREE: 28% MINNESOTA 2#-"#$ 5G&BB"#/ A+$Z9$#;? 8 How frequently do you buy goods or services online from e-commerce sites like Amazon, eBay, Craigslist, Overstock and others? Would you say... HRJ IKJ LRJ IQJ *$+? A+$Z9$#'-? 5&D$3G(' A+$Z9$#'-? 1&' ,&& A+$Z9$#'-? 1&' W' W--[1$@$+ N#%9+$ A + $ Z 9 $ # ' - ?
1 & '
A + $ Z 9 $ # ' - ?
!"#$%&'()* ,*-.//0 RL KK 1*2"#"*2"*3 ,*-.4.0 RP KM 5"67(8)3 ,*-.9:0 LR QR ;7*<"8=)>=" ,*-.?40 RP KM @72"8)3" ,*-.4A0 RL KQ B'%"8)& ,*-.490 LS QP FREQUENTLY: 39% NOT FREQUENTLY: 59%