0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
16 vizualizări1 pagină
These notes are in part based on the following sources:
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Roberts, I. (1997). Comparative Syntax. London: Arnold.
These notes are in part based on the following sources:
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Roberts, I. (1997). Comparative Syntax. London: Arnold.
These notes are in part based on the following sources:
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Roberts, I. (1997). Comparative Syntax. London: Arnold.
These notes are in part based on the following sources:
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Roberts, . (199!). Comparative Syntax. London: "rnold. 4.1 The distribution and form of overt DPs #ase t$eor% acco&nts for t$e d'str'b&t'on and form of overt ()s (as o**osed to covert ()s, s&c$ as traces of mo+ement). t def'nes contexts 'n w$'c$ ()s are ass'gned abstract case and t$en 'm*oses t$e re,&'rement t$at o+ert ()s $a+e abstract case- a cond't'on known as t$e #ase .'lter. (1) #ase .'lter /() 'f () 's *$onolog'call% real'0ed and not case1marked 2$&s, t$e contrast between (3a) and (3b) co&ld be attr'b&ted to t$e case1ass'gn'ng ab'l't'es of t$e select'ng $eads 'n+ol+ed: a +erb ass'gns acc&sat'+e case to 'ts com*lement, b&t a no&n der'+ed from t$'s +erb fa'ls to do so. 2$e str&ct&re can be resc&ed b% t$e 'nsert'on of t$e 4d&mm%5 *re*os't'on of. (3) (a) 6 7) destro% Rome8 (b) /6 9) destr&ct'on Rome8 (b5) 6 9) destr&ct'on 6 )) of Rome88 "d:ect'+es a**ear to *attern w't$ no&ns 'n t$'s res*ect: (;) (a) )o'rot 6 7) en+'es $'m8 (b) /)o'rot 's 6 ") en+'o&s $'m8 (b5) )o'rot 's 6 ") en+'o&s 6 )) of $'m88 #ase t$eor% 's based on t$e *rem'se t$at mor*$olog'cal case (e.g. case end'ngs on no&ns 'n lang&ages l'ke <erman or Lat'n) 's t$e o+ert reflex of abstract case (t$at 's, s%ntact'c case feat&res). On t$'s +'ew, lang&ages s$ow *arametr'c +ar'at'on 'n t$e man'festat'on of mor*$olog'cal case forms, b&t t$e'r &nderl%'ng s%stem of abstract case 's t$e same. 2$e 'n't'al mot'+at'on for case t$eor% came from look'ng at en+'ronments 'n w$'c$ o+ert ()s are not allowed b&t co+ert ones are. nf'n't'+al cla&ses generall% cannot $a+e o+ert s&b:ects: (4) (a) /"lan=s *lan 6$e>$'m to sell mar':&ana8 (a=) "lan=s *lan 6 ?? to sell mar':&ana8 (b) /t=s 'llegal 6one to sell mar':&nana8 (b=) t=s 'llegal 6 ?? to sell mar':&nana8 (c) /6>me to be *res'dent8 's n'ce (c=) 6 ?? to be *res'dent8 's n'ce (d) /)$'l tr'ed 6$e>$'m to *la% t$e mar'mba8 (d=) )$'l tr'ed 6 ?? to *la% t$e mar'mba8 (@) (a) "lan=s *lan 6t$at $e wo&ld sell mar':&ana8 (b) t=s 'llegal 6'f one sells mar':&nana8 (c) 62$at am *res'dent8 's n'ce (d) no *ara*$rase for (4d) (A) (a) "lan=s *lan 6for $'m to sell mar':&ana8 (b) t=s 'llegal 6for one to sell mar':&nana8 (c) 6.or me to be *res'dent8 's n'ce (d) )$'l wanted 6$'mself to *la% t$e mar'mba8 2$e &ngrammat'cal't% of t$e exam*les 'n (4a1d) co&ld be dealt w't$ as follows. Be ass&me, as before, t$at s&b:ect agreement ("grC) and tense (2) are located 'n a node . 9ow s&**ose t$at nom'nat'+e case 's a relat'on between "grC 'n t$e 1node and t$e () 'n 'ts s*ec'f'er. f 'nf'n't'+al cla&ses lack (s&ff'c'ent) mark'ng for s&b:ect agreement to ass'gn case to t$e s&b:ect, t$en t$e #ase .'lter r&les o&t o+ert s&b:ects 'n 'nf'n't'+al cla&ses. O+ert s&b:ects are *oss'ble 'n tensed cla&ses, w$'c$, b% $%*ot$es's, carr% s&b:ect agreement 'n (cf. (@)). Howe+er, t$e% are also *oss'ble 'n 'nf'n't'+al cla&ses 'f t$e s&b:ect 's *receded b% t$e *re*os't'onal com*lement'0er for, as 'n (Aa1c). Be know 'nde*endentl% t$at Dngl's$ *re*os't'ons ass'gn e't$er acc&sat'+e or dat'+e case (I gave a book to him). C'nce s&b:ects *receded b% a *re*os't'on carr% s&c$ a case, t$e s'm*lest ass&m*t'on 's t$at t$e% are ass'gned case b% t$e *re*os't'on. n (Ad), too, t$e o+ert s&b:ect of t$e 'nf'n't'+al cla&se $as acc&sat'+e case, e+en t$o&g$ 't 's not *receded b% a *re*os't'on. Howe+er, 't 's d'rectl% *receded b% a +erb, o*en'ng &* t$e *oss'b'l't% t$at t$e +erb ass'gns 't acc&sat'+e case across a cla&se bo&ndar%. 2$'s 'n t&rn ra'ses t$e ,&est'on w$% (4d) 's &ngrammat'cal. Be ret&rn to t$'s *roblem below. .or t$e moment, we can s&mmar'0e t$e conf'g&rat'ons for case ass'gnment as follows. Case assigners with their assignment configurations: 7erbs: acc&sat'+e E &nder a relat'on resembl'ng s'ster$ood )re*os't'ons: acc&sat'+e, dat'+e or ablat'+e (de*end'ng on t$e *re*os't'on and t$e lang&age) E &nder a relat'on resembl'ng s'ster$ood "grC (or ) nom'nat'+e E 'n a C*ec1Head relat'on (not &nder s'ster$ood) #onf'rmat'on for t$e 'dea t$at "grC 's 'n+ol+ed 'n t$e l'cens'ng of o+ert s&b:ects comes from t$e fact t$at 'n some lang&ages 'n w$'c$ 'nf'n't'+al +erbs are 'nflected for *erson and n&mber (s&c$ as )ort&g&ese) t$e s&b:ect 'n s&c$ cla&ses can be o+ert: (!) Cera d'f'c'l 6eles a*ro+ar1em a *ro*osta8 B'll1be d'ff'c< t$e% to1a**ro+e13Pl t$e *ro*osal =t w'll be d'ff'c< for t$em to a**ro+e t$e *ro*osal= B$at 's somew$at &n*leasant, $owe+er, 's t$at s&c$ an acco&nt of t$e contrast between Dngl's$ and )ort&g&ese, makes reference to mor*$olog'cal case (as o**osed to abstract case). Of co&rse one co&ld ma'nta'n t$at t$e d'fference 'n mor*$olog'cal case forms 'n t$'s case reflects a d'fference 'n abstract case, b&t t$at of co&rse &nderm'nes t$e 'dea t$at abstract case 's 'nde*endent of mor*$olog'cal case. 4.2 nherent case 2$e exam*les we $a+e looked at so far clearl% s$ow t$at a () ma% rece'+e case from a $ead t$at does not F1mark 't. .or 'nstance, t$e s&b:ect a sentence rece'+es 'ts F1role from t$e +erb, b&t 's normall% case1marked b% "grC. C'm'larl%, 'n t$e exam*les 'n (A), t$e embedded s&b:ect rece'+es 'ts F1role from t$e embedded *red'cate, e+en t$o&g$ 't 's de*endent for acc&sat'+e case on a *re*os't'on or a $'g$er +erb. Co bot$ nom'nat'+e and acc&sat'+e case ass'gnment a**ear not d'rectl% related to F1mark'ng. nterest'ngl%, t$'s d'ssoc'at'on between F1mark'ng and case1mark'ng 's not fo&nd w't$ mark'ng for ablat'+e, dat'+e and gen't'+e (excl&d'ng *er$a*s *ossess'+e gen't'+e). 2$&s, t$ere are no lang&ages 'n w$'c$ a +erb marks dat'+e on a () t$at 't does not F1mark. C'm'larl%, alt$o&g$ t$ere are lang&ages t$at somet'mes allow dat'+e s&b:ects (so1called ,&'rk% s&b:ects), s&c$ a s&b:ect does not rece'+e 'ts case &nder agreement w't$ "grC (b&t *oss'bl% *r'or to mo+ement, from t$e +erb t$at selects 't): (G) Strakunum leiddist sklann (celand'c) the boys!"T got bored#sg in the school 9ot'ce t$at t$e s&b:ect does not agree w't$ t$e +erb, w$'c$ a**ears 'n t$e defa< t$'rd *erson s'ng&lar. n order to ca*t&re t$'s d'c$otom%, we ass&me t$at w$'le t$e nom'nat'+e and acc&sat'+e case1mark'ng ab'l't% of a $ead are &nrelated to 'ts t$emat'c *ro*ert'es, mark'ng for ablat'+e, dat'+e and gen't'+e case are d'rectl% l'nked to F1mark'ng. (9) Be w'll $encefort$ refer to dat'+e and 'ts co&s'ns as t$e inherent cases and to nom'nat'+e and acc&sat'+e as t$e structural cases. 4.! "ore about configurations for case assignment (ata from O7 lang&ages l'ke (&tc$ and <erman s&ggest t$at t$e conf'g&rat'on for c$eck'ng of acc&sat'+e case 's weaker t$an s'ster$ood. n t$e (&tc$ exam*le 'n (1H), t$e ob:ect does not $a+e to be ad:acent to t$e +erb: (1H) ... dat Ian $et boek g'steren las ... t$at Io$n t$e book %esterda% read =... t$at Io$n read t$e book %esterda%= "ss&m'ng, as before, onl% b'nar% branc$'ng tree str&ct&res, t$en het boek cannot be a s'ster to las 'n (1H). B&t we m&st be caref&l not to weaken t$e re,&'red str&ct&ral relat'on too m&c$ or we w'll for 'nstance not be able to *re+ent t$e ob:ect from be'ng ass'gned nom'nat'+e case. Be co&ld make a ste* 'n t$e r'g$t d'rect'on b% ass&m'ng t$at t$e conf'g&rat'on for case ass'gnment and t$at of ('nternal) t$eta1mark'ng are essent'all% t$e same: m'n'mal m1command. n t$at case we wo&ld ex*ect t$at t$e () t$at 's ass'gned case c1commands t$e case ass'gn'ng $ead and 's conta'ned 'n 'ts max'mal *ro:ect'on. 2$'s works f'ne for ass'gnment of nom'nat'+e to t$e () 'n C*ec): t$e () c1commands and 's conta'ned 'n ). C'm'larl%, a com*lement () ass'gned acc&sat'+e b% a +erb or a *re*os't'on w'll c1command t$e rele+ant $ead and be conta'ned 'n 'ts max'mal *ro:ect'on. Jo& ma% c$eck t$'s for and 7 'n t$e str&ct&re below: (11) 2$at t$'s cannot be t$e w$ole stor% becomes a**arent w$en we ret&rn to t$e k'nd of data we left &nd'sc&ssed earl'er (4d) and (Ad), re*eated $ere as (13a1b), and 'ndeed 'f we look a b't more closel% at $ow a *re*os't'on co&ld case mark t$e s&b:ect of an 'nf'n't'+al cla&se, as 'n (13c). (13) (a) /)$'l tr'ed 6$e>$'m to *la% t$e mar'mba8 (b) )$'l wanted 6$'mself to *la% t$e mar'mba8 (c) "lan=s *lan 6for $'m to sell mar':&ana8
(1;) #learl%, 'n t$ese cases t$e arg&ment does not c1command t$e $ead from w$'c$ 't rece'+es case (alt$o&g$ t$e o**os'te is t$e case). .or t$'s reason, t$ese conf'g&rat'ons are &s&all% referred to as exce*t'onal case1mark'ng (D#K) conf'g&rat'ons. 2$e ex'stence of D#K constr&ct'ons creates d'ff'c< *roblems for case t$eor%, beca&se 't makes 't $ard to def'ne t$e conf'g&rat'on &nder w$'c$ case1mark'ng a**l'es. K'n'mal m1command can onl% be ma'nta'ned as a def'n't'on, 'f t$e 'nf'n't'+al 1nodes 'n (1;) some$ow do not co&nt as closer commanders. 2$'s *roblem $as s*arked off an alternat'+e a**roac$ to case ass'gnment 'n w$'c$ com*lements mo+e *ast t$e $ead t$at selects t$em to a $'g$er s*ec'f'er *os't'on, w$ere t$e% c$eck case w't$ a $ead 'n a s*ec'f'er1$ead conf'g&rat'on. Be w'll d'sc&ss t$'s a**roac$ to case t$eor% 'n t$e next 'nstalment. 2o s&mmar'0e t$e d'sc&ss'on so far: $ 2$e #ase .'lter l'm'ts t$e occ&rrence of o+ert ()s to case1marked *os't'ons. $ #ase 's ass'gned 'n a local doma'n of some sort. $ 2ensed , 7 and ) are case ass'gners. t a**ears t$at, 'n Dngl's$ at least, " and 9 are &nable to ass'gn case. $ 2$ere 's a d'st'nct'on between 'n$erent and str&ct&ral case. n$erent case 's l'nked to F1mark'ng, w$'le str&ct&ral case 's not. 4.4 Passive (14) (a) 2$e enem% destro%ed a c't% (b) " c't% was destro%ed (b% t$e enem%) (c) /2$ere was destro%ed a c't% (b% t$e enem%) 6bad 'n Dngl's$8 (c=) Dr werd een stad +erwoest (door de +':and) 6b&t f'ne 'n (&tc$ and ot$er lang&ages8 4.4.1 Properties of passives $ 2$e s&b:ect of t$e *ass'+e corres*onds to t$e 'nternal arg&ment of t$e corres*ond'ng act'+e. $ 2$e external t$eta role 'n t$e act'+e 's ass'gned 'n an o*t'onal b%1*$rase 'n t$e *ass'+e. $ t a**ears t$at t$e 'nternal arg&ment mo+es to C*ec) 'n order to rece'+e nom'nat'+e case from (cf 14b). $ f C*ec) 's a+a'lable as a land'ng s'te for t$e ob:ect, t$en 't m&st be t$e case t$at t$e *ass'+e +erb does not $a+e an external arg&ment. n ot$er words, 't s$o&ld not ass'gn an external F1role. 2$'s 's conf'rmed 'n lang&ages s&c$ as (&tc$, 'n w$'c$ t$e s&b:ect of a *ass'+e can be an ex*let'+e (14c). (1@) Be can f'nd conf'rmat'on t$at t$ese are 'ndeed t$e *ro*ert'es of *ass'+e b% look'ng at a *ass'+e +erb w$'c$ takes a cla&se as 'ts 'nternal arg&ment. #ons'der t$e facts 'n (1A). Dxam*le (1Aa) s$ows t$at believe 's a so1called exce*t'onal case mark'ng +erb: 't ass'gns acc&sat'+e case to t$e s&b:ect of t$e 'nf'n't'+al ). Dxam*le (1Ab) 's &ngrammat'cal beca&se *ass'+e believed $as lost 'ts ab'l't% to ass'gn acc&sat'+e case. 2$at t$'s 's t$e correct acco&nt for 'ts &ngrammat'cal't% 's conf'rmed b% (1Ac): $ere t$e com*lement of *ass'+e believed 's a tensed cla&se. 2$e s&b:ect of t$'s cla&se rece'+es nom'nat'+e case from tensed . 9ot'ce t$at t$e s&b:ect of t$e *ass'+e +erb 's ex*let'+e it. 2$'s conf'rms t$at a *ass'+e +erb does not ass'gn an external t$eta1role. 9ow cons'der (1Ad), t$e grammat'cal co&nter*art of (1Ab). I&st as 'n (14b), Ko+e $as ra'sed t$e embedded s&b:ect (), w$'c$ cannot get case from t$e *ass'+e +erb, to s*ec), w$ere 't gets nom'nat'+e case from tensed . (1A) (a) Be bel'e+e 6$'m to $a+e destro%ed t$e e+'dence8 (b) /t was bel'e+ed 6$'m to $a+e destro%ed t$e e+'dence8 (c) t was bel'e+ed 6 #) t$at $e $ad destro%ed t$e e+'dence8 (d) He 1 was bel'e+ed 6 ) t 1 to $a+e destro%ed t$e e+'dence8 Of co&rse we $a+e no acco&nt of %hy *ass'+e +erbs $a+e t$ese *ro*ert'es. 2$ere 's some reason to bel'e+e t$at 'n t$e *ass'+e constr&ct'on t$e external role of t$e +erb, rat$er t$an be'ng com*letel% absent, 's ass'gned to t$e *ass'+e mor*$eme on t$e +erb. 2$'s F1role 's often referred to as t$e absorbed role. 2$e e+'dence for t$e +'ew t$at t$e external F1role 's st'll some$ow *resent 'n a *ass'+e comes from t$e remarkable contrasts below: (1!) (a) 2$e boat was s&nk del'beratel% (LabsorbedL agent) (a=) /2$e boat sank del'beratel% (absent agent) (b) 2$e boat was s&nk ('n order) to collect t$e 'ns&rance (LabsorbedL agent) (b=) /2$e boat sank ('n order) to collect t$e 'ns&rance (absent agent) "d:&ncts of manner, s&c$ as deliberately re,&'re t$e *resence of an agent. 2$e same 's tr&e of *&r*ose cla&ses s&c$ as in order to collect the insurance. (1G) 4.1 #aising 9ow com*are t$e *arad'gm 'n (1Ab1d) to t$at 'n (19a1c): (19) (a) /t seems $'m to $a+e destro%ed t$e e+'dence (b) t seems 6 #) t$at $e $as destro%ed t$e e+'dence8 (c) He 1 seems 6 ) t 1 to $a+e destro%ed t$e e+'dence8 4.1.1 Properties of raising Be concl&de t$at seem $as exactl% t$e *ro*ert'es of *ass'+e believe: $ t cannot ass'gn acc&sat'+e case (and t$erefore (19a) 's bad) $ t does not ass'gn an external t$eta1role (and t$erefore 'ts s&b:ect can be an ex*let'+e, as 'n (19b)) $ t t$erefore *ro+'des an en+'ronment for ()1mo+ement (as 'n (19c)). 4.1.2 #aising ad$ectives: raising is not restricted to raising verbs (3H) (a) /t 's l'kel% Io$n to w'n (b) t 's l'kel% 6 #) t$at Io$n w'll w'n8 (c) Io$n 1 's l'kel% 6 ) t 1 to w'n8 4.2 #aising versus control Ra's'ng +erbs m&st be d'st'ng&'s$ed from +erbs of control, s&c$ as try. C&c$ +erbs are also followed b% an 'nf'n't'+e w't$ a n&ll s&b:ect. B&t t$'s s&b:ect cannot be trace, beca&se t$e matr'x s&b:ect occ&*'es a t$eta1*os't'on: (31) (a) Io$n 1 tr'ed 6 ) )RO 1 to w'n8 (b) /t tr'ed t$at Io$n won Be m&st t$erefore ass&me t$at t$e n&ll s&b:ect 'n ,&est'on 's a n&ll *ronom'nal element t$at acts as an arg&ment. Hence, 'n (31a) bot$ John and PRO rece'+e a t$eta1role (from try and win res*ect'+el%). 4.! %ur&io's (eneralisation (') " verb %hich lacks an external argument &ails to assign accusative case ('') " verb %hich &ails to check accusative case &ails to thetamark an external argument B&r0'o=s general'sat'on *red'cts t$e ex'stence of t$ree t%*es of +erbs: $ 7DRB1: 6 F F 8 trans't'+es $ 7DRB3: 6 F 8 'ntrans't'+es $ 7DRB;: 6 F 8 &nacc&sat'+es Onl% t%*e t$ree, t$e &nacc&sat'+es, do not ass'gn acc&sat'+e case. )ass'+es and ra's'ng +erbs are &nacc&sat'+e1t%*e +erbs. B&t B&r0'o (19GA) 'dent'f'es anot$er class of +erbs t$at be$a+e l'ke *ass'+e +erbs 'n man% res*ects. (33) (a) <'acomo telefona ('ntrans't'+e, l'ke slee*) <'acome tele*$ones (b) <'acomo arr'+a (&nacc&sat'+e, l'ke was seen) <'acomo arr'+es 4.!.1 )ne*argument verbs in talian +e*cliticisation (3;) (a) <'acomo $a 'ns<ato d&e st&dent' <. $as 'ns<ed two st&dents (b) <'acome ne $a 'ns<ato d&e (from com*lement ()) <. of1t$em $as 'ns<ed two (34) (a) <'acomo $a *arlato a d&e st&dent' <. $as s*oken to two st&dents (b) /<'acome ne $a *arlato a d&e (from com*lement ))) <. of1t$em $as s*oken to two (3@) (a) <'acomo *assa tre sett'mane a K'lano <. *asses t$ree weeks 'n K' (b) <'acomo ne *assa tre a K'lano (from com*lement ()) <. of1t$em *asses t$ree 'n K'lan (c) 2re sett'mane sono state *assate a K'lano (ok to *ass'+'0e) 2$ree weeks $a+e been *assed 'n K'lan (3A) (a) <'acomo resta tre sett'mane a K'lano <. sta%s t$ree weeks 'n K'lan (b) /<'acomo ne resta tre a K'lano (from ad:&nct) <. of1t$em sta%s t$ree 'n K'lan (c) /2re sett'mane sono state *assate a K'lano (can=t *ass'+'0e an 'ntrans't'+e) 2$ree weeks $a+e been rema'ned 'n K'lan
(3!)
2$e en+'ronment for ne1cl't'c'0at'on (onl% from a () t$at 's a com*lement to 7):
,ree inversion With transitives (3G) (a) 2re rega00e $anno mang'ato &n dolce 2$ree g'rls $a+e eaten a sweet (b) Hanno mang'ato &n dolce tre rega00e (nom) Ha+e eaten a sweet t$ree g'rls With passives (39) (a) Kolt' st&dent' f&rono arrestat' Kan% st&dents were arrested (b) .&rono arrestat' molt' st&dent' (nom) Bere arrested man% st&dents With one-argument verbs (;H) (a) Kolt' st&dent' telefonano Kan% st&dents tele*$one (b) 2elefonano molt' st&dent' (nom) 2ele*$one man% st&dents (;1) (a) Kolt' st&dent' arr'+ano Kan% st&dents arr'+e (b) "rr'+ano molt' st&dent' "rr'+e man% st&dents 4.!.2 n what position are the postverbal sub$ects- Postverbal sub$ect in transitives (;3) /9e $anno mang'ato &n dolce tre (s&ggests ad:o'ned to 7= or 7)) Of1t$em $a+e eaten a sweet t$ree Postverbal sub$ect in passives (;;) 9e f&rono arrestat' molt' (m&st be a com*lementM) Of1t$em were arrested man% Postverbal sub$ect in one*argument verbs (;4) (a) /9e telefonano molt' (s&ggest ad:o'ned to 7= or 7)) Of1t$em tele*$oned man% (b) 9e arr'+ano molt' (m&st be a com*lementM) Of1t$em arr'+ed man% 4.!.! .u/iliary selection (;@) (a) <'acomo $a telefonato ('ntrans't'+e) <'acomo $as tele*$oned (b) <'acome N arr'+ato (&nacc&ast'+e) <'acomo 's arr'+ed 0ssere*selection (B&r0'o) 2$ere 's a c$a'n between t$e s&b:ect *os't'on and t$e com*lement *os't'on of t$e +erb. 4.!.4 Conclusion Telefonare 's a tr&e 'ntrans't'+e +erb (l'ke Dngl's$ sleep). Arrivare 's an &nacc&sat'+e +erb: D2HDR: molt' st&dent' 1 arr'+ano t 1 OR: ec ex*l arr'+ano molt' st&dent' 2$e s&rface order 's der'+ed b% mo+'ng t$e &nderl%'ng ob:ect to s*ec) or b% 'nsert'ng a non1o+ert ex*let'+e 'n t$e +acant s&b:ect *os't'on. 9ot'ce t$at t$e occ&rrence of a *$onet'call% n&ll ex*let'+e 'n a lang&age l'ke tal'an s$o&ld not come as a s&r*r'se. tal'an 's a so1called *ro1 dro* lang&age and allows 'ts s&b:ect *rono&ns to be *$onet'call% em*t%: (;A) ec $a mang'ato &n dolce $as eaten a sweet 2$'s ec be$a+es l'ke a tr&e *rono&n. Be w'll call 't pro (*rono&nce Lsmall *roL). C'nce *rono&ns can be *$onet'call% n&ll 'n tal'an and ex*let'+es are alwa%s *rono&ns, we wo&ld ex*ect to f'nd *$onet'call% n&ll ex*let'+es 'n tal'an, as 'ndeed we do. 4.4 1naccusatives in 0nglish Ra's'ng +erbs and *ass'+es are &nacc&sat'+e +erbs, as d'sc&ssed abo+e. B&t w$at abo&t arrive and ot$er +erbs w$'c$ are &nacc&sat'+es 'n tal'anO 4.4.1 .vere2essere Dngl's$ does not $a+e t$e a+ere>essere d'st'nct'on, b&t older stages of t$e lang&age d'd and s$owed t$e ex*ected *attern. 4.4.2 +e*cliticisation Dngl's$ does not $a+e ne1cl'c'sat'on b&t we can 'nfer somet$'ng from t$e &se of ex*let'+e there: (;!) (a) 2$ree men arr'+ed (b) 2$ere arr'+ed t$ree men (;G) (a) 2$ree men sle*t (b) /2$ere sle*t t$ree men (;9) (a) 2$ree men bo&g$t a book (b) /2$ere bo&g$t t$ree men a book .'nall%, +erbs l'ke arrive *attern w't$ *ass'+e *art'c'*les 'n be'ng able to occ&r 'n *renom'nal *os't'on: (4H) 2$e recentl% *romoted recr&'t (41) 2$e recentl% arr'+ed recr&'t (43) /2$e recentl% sle*t recr&'t #eferences 4.3 Problems Problem 1 .or t$e follow'ng sentences, 'nd'cate t$e case of eac$ () and s*ec'f% $ow 't 's ass'gned: (4;) (a) He ga+e $er a book. (b) 2$e book was g'+en to $er. (c) 2$e destr&ct'on of Rome was a s&r*r'se to no one. (d) Rome5s destr&ct'on s&r*r'sed no one. Problem 2 Be $a+e seen t$at t$e *re*os't'on of a**ears to act as a d&mm% case1ass'gner w$en no&ns want to take a () com*lement: (44) (a) /2$e destr&ct'on Rome. (b) 2$e destr&ct'on of Rome. B$at *roblems are created for t$'s +'ew b% t$e follow'ng exam*les: (4@) (a) 2$e bel'ef t$at Io$n w'll w'n. (b) /2$e bel'ef Io$n to w'n. (c) /2$e bel'ef of Io$n to w'n. Problem ! Be $a+e now seen a n&mber of exam*les w$ere t$e s&b:ect *os't'on 's f'lled b% an ex*let'+e. B't$ &nacc&sat'+es, bot$ Dngl's$ and tal'an allow t$'s: (4A) (a) 2$ree men arr'+ed (b) 2$ere arr'+ed t$ree men B&t we saw t$e same *attern 'n exam*les 'n+ol+'ng ra's'ng: (4!) (a) There seems to be a man in the garden (b) " man seems to be in the garden "n 'm*ortant *ro*ert% of t$ese sentences 's t$at t$e s&b:ect agrees w't$ t$e s&b:ect 'f t$e s&b:ect 's not an ex*let'+e, b&t agrees w't$ t$e ex*let'+e=s =assoc'ate= 'f t$e ex*let'+e 's t$e s&b:ect: (4G) (a) 'There seems to be three men in the garden (b) 'There seem to be a man in the garden How co&ld t$ese facts be acco&nted forO Problem 4 (raw a tree for t$e follow'ng sentence. <'+e arg&ments for %o&r anal%s's. ncl&de t$eta1relat'ons and case ass'gnment. 2$'s book was wr'tten 'n 19GG. Problem 3 .or eac$ of t$e follow'ng &nderl'ned 'tems dec'de w$et$er 't tr'ggers control or ra's'ng: (49) (a) Io$n a**ears to be a great sw'mmer. (b) Io$n managed to sw'm across t$e #$annel. (c) Io$n wants to sw'm across t$e "tlant'c as well. (d) B&t 't 's *oss'ble t$at $e w'll not make 't. 4.4 ,urther reading Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. 6c$a*ter ;: #ase t$eor%- on de*artmental f'le8 Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to overnment and !inding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. 6c$a*ter @: 9on1O+ert #ategor'es: )RO and #ontrol- on de*artmental f'le8. Roberts, . (199!). Comparative Syntax. London: "rnold. 6c$a*ter 3: case and agreement- on de*artmental f'le8 Hans +an de Poot>3H October 3HH;