Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third
World by Joel S. Migdal
Review by: Jeff Goodwin Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 40, No. 1 (Oct., 1991), pp. 217-220 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1154526 . Accessed: 19/09/2013 03:15 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. . The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Economic Development and Cultural Change. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 134.115.2.116 on Thu, 19 Sep 2013 03:15:20 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Reviews 217 Joel S. Migdal. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Rela- tions and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988. Pp. xxi + 296. $45.00 (cloth); $10.95 (paper). Jeff Goodwin New York University Much recent research on Third World politics has focused on the ques- tion of democracy versus authoritarianism. Following in the footsteps of Barrington Moore, Jr., it explores the origins of capitalist democ- racy, authoritarianism, and socialist revolution in the specific context of postcolonial or "peripheral" societies. Joel Migdal's new book, by contrast, examines a logically prior issue: Why have only a very few Third World states developed the capacity to actually implement poli- cies of any sort? The result of Migdal's explorations into this issue is one of the most stimulating books on Third World politics that I have read in a long time. The first-and in my view more compelling-half of Migdal's book examines the determinants of state capacities in the Third World. Migdal's analysis is fleshed out through a comparison of two former British possessions, Sierra Leone (where a very weak state emerged) and Palestine (where the unusually strong state of Israel developed). Migdal concludes that one necessary condition for the development of a strong state is a rapid and generalized process of social dislocation- the evisceration, as it were, of existing institutions of social control- brought on by the incorporation of peripheral societies into the capital- ist world-system. However, this sort of dislocation characterized Sierra Leone as much as Palestine, so world-systemic forces alone, Migdal concludes, do not tell us the whole story. The other crucial requirement for the development of a strong state is a colonial power that channels resources to more or less centralized state (or state-like) organizations that are thereby able to extend their control throughout the entire society. Such was the legacy of British imperialism in Pales- tine, astutely exploited by Zionist labor leaders via the so-called Jewish Agency. By contrast, where the colonial power channeled resources to locally based chiefs, landlords, and other "strongmen," social control became diffused through a web of nonstate organizations, creating the "strong societies" of the book's title. This was the legacy of British rule in Sierra Leone and the typical progeny, in fact, of colonialism more generally. Migdal concludes that social scientists need to exam- ine "the long-term intended and unintended effects of outside political forces-particularly the assertion of autonomous state interests-on colonized societies" as well as "the impact of the expanding world market" (p. 102, my emphasis). This content downloaded from 134.115.2.116 on Thu, 19 Sep 2013 03:15:20 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 218 Economic Development and Cultural Change This is a conclusion that is sure to please practitioners of "state- centered" social science. However, Migdal is concerned that this theo- retical current has fetishized the state and failed to examine the ways in which social structures have shaped the configuration of the very states that have been cast by state-centered theorists (erroneously) as independent variables. In the second half of his book, therefore, Mig- dal looks at how the diffuse social control that characterizes "strong societies" shapes state organizations and policies. His conclusion, based on a fascinating analysis of Nasser's "revolution from above" in Egypt (with occasional glances at Mexico and India), is that strong societies have prevented weak and even moderately strong states from centralizing social control. The fragmented structure of such societies, moreover, shapes the state in a variety of ways that actually reinforce such social fragmentation-by producing accommodations between the state and local strongmen, discouraging the development of ratio- nal bureaucracy in state organizations, facilitating the "capture" of local state institutions by sectional interests, encouraging capitulations to the demands of powerful capitalists, etc. Migdal concludes that in the absence of additional severe social dislocations "it is unlikely that new strong states will emerge in the foreseeable future" (p. 277). I found Migdal's analysis (and prognosis) generally convincing, but there are a number of ways in which he could have written an even more powerful book. First of all, since Israel (a rather unusual case, to say the least) is the only strong state Migdal discusses at any length, it is difficult to know whether he has actually pinpointed the necessary and sufficient conditions for the development of strong states. Migdal does note in passing some other examples of strong Third World states-including Cuba, China, Vietnam, Taiwan, and both Koreas-but it is far from clear that these cases support the theory developed in the first half of the book. Western (and Japanese) imperialists certainly did not channel resources to centralized state organizations in all of these societies. Arguably, it was precisely their failure to do so that allowed anti-imperialist revolutionaries (as op- posed to collaborators) to become strong in several of these countries, seize the banner of nationalism, and eventually topple weak colonial or neocolonial regimes.' Curiously absent from Migdal's list of strong Third World states is South Africa, a country much more comparable to Israel, one would have thought, than Sierra Leone.2 In any event, Migdal's theory of strong-state formation will need to be tested and refined against more than one case. Another way in which Migdal's ideas might be tested and refined is by disaggregating the notion of state strength and using more focused comparisons to gauge particular state capacities. Indeed, a problem with the second half of the book, in sharp contrast to the first, is a certain deafness to variations in state capacities among the broad group This content downloaded from 134.115.2.116 on Thu, 19 Sep 2013 03:15:20 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Reviews 219 of moderately strong states. All such states come across as rather impotent in Migdal's account-and perpetually doomed to impotence-in light of the fragmentation of social control with which they must grapple. Yet surely some such states, at certain times, have been more effective than others in implementing certain sorts of poli- cies. There is much more to be said about why states of more or less comparable strength have proven better or worse at encouraging economic development, redistributing land and other resources, foster- ing a national identity, encouraging political participation, defending their frontiers against other states, and so on. And the analysis of these issues would seem to demand finer distinctions than that between state strength and weakness. I also found Migdal's polemic against state-centered sociology to be somewhat confusing. He sometimes writes as if this tradition simply assumes that all states are strong and autonomous-not a particularly astute assumption when it comes to the Third World. But state- centered sociology simply suggests that the organization of states, be they weak or strong, may help to explain why they (and other social actors and institutions) do what they do; it directs our attention, in other words, to factors typically neglected in society-centered explana- tions. A given country need not itself be state centered, however, for a state-centered analysis to pay dividends.3 Finally, since Migdal is well aware that the development of strong states "has been accompanied by attacks on the identities and lives of the most vulnerable elements of society, minorities and the poor" (p. xx), it would have been interesting had he considered the preconditions for the development of states that are both strong and amenable to some sort of popular control. In fact, Migdal's analysis seems to sug- gest an explanation for the paucity of states in the Third World that are at once strong and democratic, although it is an explanation he does not develop. Since the formation of strong states, according to Migdal, requires severe social dislocations, the sort of popular or even elite associations that might act as a countervailing force against the state simply do not exist; nor are such associations always nurtured, he shows, by colonialists. Democratization, in other words, presup- poses a certain type of strong society (as de Tocqueville argued so long ago), but the latter, Migdal demonstrates, has acted as a formida- ble barrier to the development of a strong state. Whatever one thinks of this particular line of reasoning, the point is that there is certainly no reason for political sociologists interested in state capacities to carry on their work in isolation from current debates about democrati- zation in the Third World (or vice versa). An adequate examination of this last issue, to be fair, would prob- ably have required an additional volume. Yet the principal value of this book, in my view, lies as much in the broad array of research This content downloaded from 134.115.2.116 on Thu, 19 Sep 2013 03:15:20 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 220 Economic Development and Cultural Change problems it will invariably generate in the attentive reader's imagina- tion as in the specific contributions, theoretical and empirical, that it offers, impressive as they are. This has always been the mark of semi- nal contributions to social science, among which this book must now be counted. No one who writes about state capacities and public policy in the Third World can afford to neglect Migdal's ideas, and I expect that his formulations will be amply tested, criticized, and elaborated in much future work. One final note: this is, by and large, an extremely well-written and well-organized book. Migdal uses metaphors masterfully, eschews trendy social science jargon, and never strays far from the principal tack of his analysis. As a result, this is a book that should be accessible to most undergraduates and, for the rest of us, a veritable model of clear and engaging scholarship. Notes 1. See, e.g., my "Colonialism and Revolution in Southeast Asia: A Com- parative Analysis," in Revolution in the World-System, ed. Terry Boswell (New York: Greenwood, 1989), pp. 59-78. 2. See, e.g., Stanley B. Greenberg, Race and State in Capitalist Develop- ment: Comparative Perspectives (New Haven, Conn., and London: Yale Uni- versity Press, 1980). 3. I thank John A. Hall for pointing this out. Ken Tout. Ageing in Developing Countries. New York: Oxford Univer- sity Press, 1989. Pp. xvi + 334. John J. Carroll Chevy Chase, Maryland This book is full of interesting accounts of how local organizations working with limited resources under difficult conditions have been making a difference. Ken Tout's focus is on problems facing rapidly aging elderly populations in developing countries and on the role played by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in helping to solve them. Tout believes that despite United Nations efforts (through the 1982 World Assembly on Aging), there is an abysmal lack of focus on the plight of millions. He emphasizes the need for more resources to cope with problems of the elderly anticipated as demographic shifts proceed. His fear is that governments lack the will to plan before crises materialize. He makes a good case that NGOs can, and in many areas do, move in to fill part of the void. Given the low priority assigned by many governments to problems of elderly persons in poor countries, Tout's story about HelpAge and similar private efforts is timely. The author speaks in seeming despair This content downloaded from 134.115.2.116 on Thu, 19 Sep 2013 03:15:20 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions