Educating about Co-sleeping as a SIDS Risk Jordan Dillmore University of South Florida
IMPLEMENTING A PRACTICE CHANGE 2 Implementation of a Practice Change: Educating about Co-sleeping as a SIDS Risk In neonatal intensive care units (NICU) across the country, many twins and other multiple gestation infants are co-bedded by NICU staff, which leads to a misunderstanding in parents of new infants. New parents have been lead to believe that that it is safe for their infants to share beds once they are home whether it is with a parent or a sibling. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013), SIDS is the leading cause of death of infants 1-12 months of age. In NICUs, bed sharing is an accepted practice only because the infants are never out of anyones sight, which ensures that the infants are not suffering from SIDS. Although, post-discharge it is no longer promoted because parents are not able to watch their newborns full time and sudden infant death syndrome is permitted to occur. PICOT In parents being discharged home with their newborn child, does the inclusion of specific co-sleeping education before discharge versus usual care decrease the rates of SIDS during the first 6 months of life? Infrastructure of Change Sarasota Memorial Hospital has a group of nursing professionals in an evidence-based practice council. An RN from every unit of the hospital, multiple ARNPs, and a DNP make up the council that is led by Jen Rheingans, PhD. To get help performing the research, this team would be available for help as well as helping to get the practice change accepted. The next person contacted would be Dana Peco who is the Clinical Educator for the delivery unit, mother and baby unit, and the IMPLEMENTING A PRACTICE CHANGE 3 NICU. Dana Peco can help with the teaching being presented to the staff in these units. Synthesized Literature Review Literature Search PubMed and CINAHL were searched employing the keywords co-bedding, co- sleeping, SIDS, and NICU. Limits were set for English language, human subjects, RCT, peer reviewed, articles in the past 5 years, and articles in the past 10 years. Three peer-reviewed studies were selected for evaluation and synthesis from these searches. Synthesis Current research is exposing the need to further educate parents against co- sleeping their infants because there is a direct link between it and infants dying from SIDS. Kemp and his fellow researchers (2000) found that 43 of the 56 infants that died of SIDS in their trials were sharing a bed. According to McCoy and fellow researchers (2008), a SIDS risk is evident in many situations of co-sleeping infants such as sharing couches, sofas, daybeds, waterbeds, or adult beds and whether it is with parents, children, or younger siblings. They suggest that parental counseling about infant sleep environments is needed so the parents can make an informed decision (McCoy et al., 2008). Kemp and colleagues proved that 84.0% of infant deaths are preventable and epidemiologic studies and public health campaigns that identify risk factors and educate have been trailed by large reductions in sudden infant death syndrome rates (2000). For example, Trachtenberg and colleagues (2012) provide supporting data with the indication of a 50% decline of infant sleep- IMPLEMENTING A PRACTICE CHANGE 4 related deaths since the 1990s via the promotion of the Back-to-Sleep campaign (2012). Research completed to date has proven that co-sleeping an infant with a parent or sibling has a direct link to SIDS as shown by the 54% of SIDS infants that died while co-sleeping in the study by Blair and fellow researchers (2009). Proposed Practice Change Kemp and colleagues (2000) found that 43 of the 56 infants that died of SIDS in their trials were sharing a bed and according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013), SIDS is the leading cause of death of infants 1-12 months of age. It is imperative that parents be educated against co-sleeping their infants to decrease the rate of SIDS post discharge from a postpartum or NICU unit in the first six months of life. This is a very low risk intervention and Trachtenberg and fellow researchers (2012) found a 50% decline in infant deaths after the education related to the Back-to Sleep campaign proving that parents are listening to medical professional opinions on lowering risks of infant deaths. Educating NICU and postpartum unit staff is imperative so they can educate the parents appropriately against co-bedding their infants in the fist six months of life in order to lower the risk for SIDS. To change this knowledge deficit, I plan to educate the staff in the NICU, labor and delivery unit, and mother and baby unit at Sarasota Memorial Hospital about the SIDS risk in co-bedding infants post-discharge so they can educate the parents. Nurses in the postpartum unit and NICU will provide 1:1 education to all parents on the dangers of co-bedding and the relationship to SIDS. Verbal and written education will be provided prior to discharge from each unit and documented in the IMPLEMENTING A PRACTICE CHANGE 5 patients chart. The education will be measured with a pre and post education knowledge survey completed by the parents. Change Strategy Promoting Engagement All stakeholders including staff and physicians impacted by the practice change will be encouraged to participate in the education and all nurses will be mandated in the discharge packet to administer both the pre and post education knowledge surveys. No one will be allowed out of this practice change as it will be a mandate before the infant is discharged but if someone would like to make suggestions on the questions asked or on education delivery plans, they will be welcome to voice it and everything will be considered. Iowa Model for Evidence-Based Practice Change Sarasota Memorial Hospital uses the Iowa model of evidence-based practice to promote quality care. According to the National Nursing Practice Network (2013), the physicians, staff, and the evidence-based practice council must acknowledge that there is a problem with SIDS rates related to co-sleeping or there is new evidence that is amenable to an evidence-based practice change. Secondly, a team of stakeholders is formed to develop, implement, and evaluate the practice change. The team pilots the feasibility and effectiveness of the possible change and if it is positive, roll out and integration of the practice is facilitated. Roll Out Plan Is this topic a priority for the organization? o Step 1- Assess the need for a practice change IMPLEMENTING A PRACTICE CHANGE 6 December 2013 o Step 2- Form a team January 2014 o Assemble relevant research and related literature February 2014 o Critique and synthesize research for use in practice February 2014 Is there sufficient research base? o Select outcome to be achieved March 2014 o Collect baseline data March 2014 o Design evidence-based practice guidelines March 2014 o Implement the project on pilot units April 2014 o Evaluate process and outcomes May 2014 o Modify the practice guideline May 2014 Is change appropriate for adoption in practice? o Institute the Change in Practice June 2014 IMPLEMENTING A PRACTICE CHANGE 7 o Continue to evaluate quality of car and new knowledge July 2014 o Disseminate results August 2014 Project Evaluation Beginning in December, nurses will administer a knowledge survey to the parents before and after the education upon discharge. This will show the efficacy of the teachings and alert the team in charge of the change of which nurses are doing well and which arent. The nurses with bad post-education scores can be retaught the information so it is assured that they are teaching to the expected caliber. Any improvement from the pre to post knowledge survey will be celebrated as a success. The effectiveness will also be measured by monitoring the SIDS rate post-discharge from Sarasota Memorial Hospital within the first six months post-discharge. The knowledge survey results will be compared to the rate of SIDS to measure the effectiveness of the change overall. Success will be the verdict when the Sarasota Memorial Hospital SIDS rate post discharge rate is lower in the most recent quarter than the last. Any decrease will be a success. Dissemination Encouraging implementation of this practice change can be done in several ways. One of which is by having the stakeholders speak about it at unit meetings before every shift to promote adoption. Regionally, Sarasota Memorial Hospital can share their project with some completed cases with other hospitals in hopes that they will adopt it too. The success information and an updated notification of the IMPLEMENTING A PRACTICE CHANGE 8 current step in the process can be posted on the Sarasota Memorial Hospital website and emailed to all staff to initiate excitement and pride in the project which will lead to more adherence both locally and regionally. The information can be posted in a nursing journal for the whole country and world to see. A stakeholder on the nursing evidence-based practice council can take the project to NICU and postpartum conferences globally to present and share the new evidence.
IMPLEMENTING A PRACTICE CHANGE 9 References Blair, P. S., Sidebotham, P., Evason- Coombe, C., Edmonds, M., Heckstall-Smith, E. M. A., & Fleming, P. (2009). Hazardous co-sleeping environments and risk factors amenable to change. British Medical Journal, 339-b3666. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3666 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Sudden Unexpected Infant Death and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/sids/index.htm Kemp, J. S., Unger, B., Wilkins, D., Psara, R. M., Ledbetter, T. L., Graham, M. A. & Thach, B. T. (2000). Unsafe sleep practices and an analysis of bed-sharing among infants dying suddenly and unexpectedly. Pediatrics, 106(3), e41. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.3.e41 McCoy, R., McKenna, J. J., & Gartner, L. (2008). Guideline on Co-Sleeping and Breastfeeding. Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. 3(1), 38-43. National Nursing Practice Network (2013). Iowa Model. Retrieved from: http://www.nnpnetwork.org/ebp-resources/iowa-model Trachtenberg, F. L., Haas, E. A., Kinney, H. C., Stanley, C., & Krous, H. F. (2012). Risk factor changes for sudden infant death syndrome after initiation of back-to-sleep campaign Pediatrics, 29(4), 630-638. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1419