(a) held for sale in the ordinary course of business; (b) in the process of production for such sale; or (c) in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in the production process or in the rendering of services. Inventory must be recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost. Includes the purchase cost and any other costs necessary in bring the inventories to their present location and condition. These may include costs incurred directly in the production of inventory such as direct labor and production overheads (i.e. conversion costs) and other expenses such as transportation and handling charges, taxes and duties that may not be recoverable from tax authorities. However, costs do not include general and administrative costs which cannot reasonable attributed to the cost of inventory. Similarly, selling and distribution expenses, storage costs and excessive expenditure resulting from abnormal wastage shall not be included in the cost of inventory. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale(IAS 2). This is simply the expected revenue from the sale of inventory after deducting any further costs that are necessary in order to sell the inventory. For example if a company has raw material costing $50, which will be sold as finished products for $80 after additional $10 of labor costs are incurred for completion, its NRV will be $70 ($80 - $10). The need to value the inventory at the lower of cost and NRV stems from the concept of prudence which requires that the assets of the entity, which in this case is inventory, must not be stated above the amount expected to be earned from its use or sale. For example, if an inventory costs $100 but its NRV is only $70, the inventory is recorded at the year end at $70. Recording inventory at a lower amount has the effect of reducing profit because a decrease in closing inventory increases the cost of sales (expense).
Why accounting for inventory separate from purchase and sales accounting? Every time a sale or purchase occurs, they are recorded in their respective ledger accounts. However, as we shall see in following sections, inventory is accounted for separately from purchases and sales through a single adjustment at the year end. Theoretically, the cost of inventory sold could be determined in two ways. One is the standard way in which purchases during the period are adjusted for movements in inventory. The second way could be to adjust purchases and sales of inventory in the inventory ledger itself. The problem with this method is the need to measure value of sales every time a sale takes place (e.g. using FIFO, LIFO or AVCO methods). If accounting for sales and purchase is kept separate from accounting for inventory, the measurement of inventory need only be calculated once at the period end. This is a more practical and efficient approach to the accounting for inventory which is why it is the most common approach adopted. Methods of calculating inventory cost As inventory is usually purchased at different rates (or manufactured at different costs) over an accounting period, there is a need to determine what cost needs to be assigned to inventory. For instance, if a company purchased inventory three times in a year at $50, $60 and $70, what cost must be attributed to inventory at the year end? Inventory cost at the end of an accounting period may be determined in the following ways: First In First Out (FIFO) Last In First Out (LIFO) Average Cost Method (AVCO) Actual Unit Cost First In First Out (FIFO) This method assumes that inventory purchased first is sold first. Therefore, inventory cost under FIFO method will be the cost of latest purchases. Consider the following example: Example Bike LTD purchased 10 bikes during January and sold 6 bikes, details of which are as follows: January 1 Purchased 5 bikes @ $50 each January 5 Sold 2 bikes January 10 Sold 1 bike January 15 Purchased 5 bikes @ 70 each January 25 Sold 3 bikes The value of 4 bikes held as inventory at the end of January may be calculated as follows: The sales made on January 5 and 10 were clearly made from purchases on 1st January. Of the sales made on January 25, it will be assumed that 2 bikes relate to purchases on January 1 whereas the remaining one bike has been issued from the purchases on 15th January. Therefore, the value of inventory under FIFO is as follows: Date Purchase Issues Inventory
Units $/Units $ Total Units $/Units $ Total Units $/Units $ Total Jan 1 5 50 250
5 50 250 Jan 5
2 50 100 3 50 150 Jan 10
1 50 50 2 50 100 Jan 15 5 70 350
5 70 350 Jan 15
7
450 Jan 25
2 50 100
1 70 70 4 70 280 As can be seen from above, the inventory cost under FIFO method relates to the cost of the latest purchases, i.e. $70
Last In First Out (LIFO) This method assumes that inventory purchased last is sold first. Therefore, inventory cost under LIFO method will be the cost of earliest purchases. Consider the following example: Example Bike LTD purchased 10 bikes during January and sold 6 bikes, details of which are as follows: January 1 Purchased 5 bikes @ $50 each January 5 Sold 2 bikes January 10 Sold 1 bike January 15 Purchased 5 bikes @ 70 each January 25 Sold 3 bikes The value of 4 bikes held as inventory at the end of January may be calculated as follows: The sales made on January 5 and 10 were clearly made from purchases on 1st January. However, all sales made on January 25 will be assumed to have been made from the purchases on January 15. Therefore, the value of inventory under LIFO is as follows: Date Purchase Issues Inventory
Units $/Units $ Total Units $/Units $ Total Units $/Units $ Total Jan 1 5 50 250
5 50 250 Jan 5
2 50 100 3 50 150 Jan 10
1 50 50 2 50 100 Jan 15 5 70 350
5 70 350 Jan 15
7
450 Jan 25
3 70 210 2 50 100
2 70 140
4
240 As can be seen from above, LIFO method allocates cost on the basis of earliest purchases first and only after inventory from earlier purchases are issued completely is cost from subsequent purchases allocated. Therefore value of inventory using LIFO will be based on outdated prices. This is the reason the use of LIFO method is not allowed for under IAS 2. Average Cost Method (AVCO) This method values inventory at the weighted average cost of all purchases. Average cost is calculated each time inventory is issued. Consider the following example: Example Bike LTD purchased 10 bikes during January and sold 6 bikes, details of which are as follows: January 1 Purchased 5 bikes @ $50 each January 5 Sold 2 bikes January 10 Sold 1 bike January 15 Purchased 5 bikes @ 70 each January 25 Sold 3 bikes The value of 4 bikes held as inventory at the end of January may be calculated as follows: All issues of inventory will be assumed to carry the average cost of all purchases up to the date of the issue. Average cost will be calculated by dividing total units of inventory by the total cost.
Date Purchase Issues Inventory
Units $/Units $ Total Units $/Units $ Total Units $/Units $ Total Jan 1 5 50 250
5 50 250 Jan 5
2 50 100 3 50 150 Jan 10
1 50 50 2 50 100 Jan 15 5 70 350
5 70 350
Average Cost of Inventory 7 64.286 450 Jan 25
3 64.286 192.858 4 64.286 257.144
As can be seen from above, AVCO method allocates cost on the average cost of purchases during the period. Average cost of inventory changes every time a purchase is made at a different price. Therefore the average cost of inventory changed from $50 to $64.286 after the purchase on January 15.
Actual Unit Cost Method
It may be appropriate to record inventory of very high value at their actual unit costs. This method is only practical where the number of inventory items is very small and distinguishable such as in the property business.ABC LTD is a construction company. It buys raw materials such as sand and clay in bulk and stores it in a central warehouse from FIFO and LIFO accounting methods are used for determining the value of unsold inventory, the cost of goods sold and other transactions like stock repurchases that need to be reported at the end of the accounting period. FIFO stands for First In, First Out, which means the goods that are unsold are the ones that were most recently added to the inventory. Conversely, LIFO is Last In, First Out, which means goods most recently added to the inventory are sold first so the unsold goods are ones that were added to the inventory the earliest. LIFO accounting is not permitted by the IFRS standards so it is less popular. It does, however, allow the inventory valuation to be lower in inflationary times.
FIFO LIFO Stands for First in, first out Last in, first out Unsold inventory Unsold inventory comprises goods acquired most recently. Unsold inventory comprises the earliest acquired goods. Restrictions There are no GAAP or IFRS restrictions for using FIFO; both allow this accounting method to be IFRS does not allow using LIFO for accounting.
FIFO LIFO used. Effect of Inflation If costs are increasing, the items acquired first were cheaper. This decreases the cost of goods sold (COGS) under FIFO and increases profit. The income tax is larger. Value of unsold inventory is also higher. If costs are increasing, then recently acquired items are more expensive. This increases the cost of goods sold (COGS) under LIFO and decreases the net profit. The income tax is smaller. Value of unsold inventory is lower. Effect of Deflation Converse to the inflation scenario, accounting profit (and therefore tax) is lower using FIFO in a deflationary period. Value of unsold inventory, is lower. Using LIFO for a deflationary period results in both accounting profit and value of unsold inventory being higher. Record keeping Since oldest items are sold first, the number of records to be maintained decreases. Since newest items are sold first, the oldest items may remain in the inventory for many years. This increases the number of records to be maintained. Fluctuations Only the newest items remain in the inventory and the cost is more recent. Hence, there is no unusual increase or decrease in cost of goods sold. Goods from number of years ago may remain in the inventory. Selling them may result in reporting unusual increase or decrease in cost of goods.