Commission of Arizona, 181 23-1061 Ariz. 215, 889 P.2d 8 Arizona Department of 1993 A.R.S. section 2009 Public Safety v. Industrial 23-1044 Commission of Arizona Irvin v. State, 301 Ark. 416, 1994 A.C.A. subtit. 6, ch. 1995 784 S.W.2d 763 73, subch. 1 Yedrysek v. State, 293 Ark. 1987 A.C.A. subtit. 4 1995 541, 739 S.W. 2d 672 Decker v. U.D. Registry, Inc., 2003 Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 2005 105 Cal. App. 4th 1382 section 425.16 Fair Political Practices Com- 2004 Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 2005 mission v. American Civil section 425.16 Rights Coalition, 121 Cal. App. 4th 1171 Contreras v. America, 1975 Cal. Ins. Code 1976 Compania General de section 11580.1 Seguros, S.A., 48 Cal. App. 3d 270 Camp Meeker Water System 1990 Cal. Pub. Util. Code 1998 v. Public Utilities Commision, section 311 51 Cal. 3d 845 Camp Meeker, supra 1990 Cal. Pub. Util. Code 1998 section 331.5 Camp Meeker, supra 1990 Cal. Pub. Util. Code 1998 div. 1, pt. 1, ch. 9, art. 1 Camp Meeker, supra 1990 Cal. Pub. Util. Code 1998 div. 1, pt. 1, ch. 9, art. 3 City of Los Angeles v. County 1983 Cal. Rev. & Tax Code 1989 of Los Angeles, 139 Cal. App. section 93 3d 999 Utah Power & Light Co. v. 1983 Idaho Code section 1984 Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 61-502A 105 Idaho 822 LeRay v. Bartholomew, 2004 La. R.S. 40:1299.42 2008 03-1370 (La. App. 5th Cir.), 871 So.2d 492 Guzzetta v. Texas Pipe Line, 1986 La. C.C. art. 493 2003 85-C-2258 (La.), 485 So.2d 508 Melerine v. State, 2000-0162 2000 La. C.C. art. 493 2003 (La. App. 4 Cir.), 773 So.2d 831 Anderson v. State of 2002 La. C.C. art. 493 2003 Louisiana Natural Resources Department, 2001-0296 (La. App. 4 Cir.), 826 So. 2d 1143 Commissioner of Revenue v. 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 Molesworth, 408 Mass. 580 62B, section 14 Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 62C, section 28 Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 62C, section 32 Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 62C, section 33 Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 62C, section 36 Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 62C, section 36A Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 62C, section 37 Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 62C, section 39 Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 62C, section 40 Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 63B, section 3 Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 65, section 27 Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 65, section 29 Molesworth, supra 1990 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1992 65A, section 6 In re Estate of McCutcheon, 1997 20 Pa. C.S. section 2002 699 A.2d 746 (Pa. Super.) 6205 Puget Sound National Bank 1994 Rev. Code Wash. 2010 v. Department of Revenue, section 82.08.037 123 Wn.2d 284 Language Source of Language "are to only directly overrule Laws 2008, ch. 169, section 2 the court decision in Gerhardt "the amendments . . . are to Laws 2009, ch. 184, section 7 overrule the court decision in . . . to the extent that" "It is the intent of the Act to Acts 1995, No. 595, section 5 legislatively overrule Irvin v. State "By these amendments, the Acts 1995, No. 1294, section 3 General Assembly of the State of Arkansas overrules" "It is the intent of the Stats 2005 ch 535 legislature . . . to overrule the decisions" "It is the intent of the Stats 2005 ch 535 legislature . . . to overrule the decisions" "it is the intent of the Stats 1976 ch 1145 Legislature in enacting this Act to reverse the effect of the Contreras case" "It is the intent of the Stats 1998 ch 886 Legislature to, among other things, overrule . . . as it pertains only to decisions affecting the energy, transportation, and communications industries" See above Stats 1998 ch 886 See above Stats 1998 ch 886 See above Stats 1998 ch 886 "it is the intent of the Stats 1989 ch 1230 Legislature in enacting this act to nullify the holding . . . in City of Los Angeles . . . ." "hereby declared to be S.L. 1984, ch 21, legislative intent that section 2 this act should overrule that portion of . . . which authorized . . . ." "The provisions . . . are Acts 2008, No. 558, intended . . . to legislatively section 2 overrule the . . . decision in LeRay . . . ." "the enactment . . . was to House Concurrent overrule certain judicial Resolution No. decisions" 306 (2004) See above House Concurrent Resolution No. 306 (2004) See above House Concurrent Resolution No. 306 (2004) "Molesworth . . . is Dep't of Rev. TIR superseded by legislation" 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 See above TIR 92-6 "This change is intended Joint State Gov't explicitly to overrule the Committee Notes result in McCutcheon" "The legislature intends . . . 2010 1ST SP.S. C 23 to supersede the holding" sections 1502 & 1503
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition To Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment Date: April 26, 2010 Time: 2:00 P.M. Place: Courtroom of Judge Phillips
Bankr. L. Rep. P 68,789 in Re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Debtor. Lifetime Communities, Inc. v. The Administrative Office of The United States Courts, 690 F.2d 35, 2d Cir. (1982)
Amicus Curiae Brief of Pacific Legal Foundation and Center For Constitutional Jurisprudence in Support of Petitioners, Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States, No. 12-1173 (Nov. 22, 2013)
Richard Mitzelfelt, Director of the Environmental Improvement Division of the New Mexico Health and Environment Department v. Department of Air Force, Colorado, Texas, Kentucky, Washington, Missouri, Indiana, Michigan, Nebraska, Wyoming, Louisiana, Kansas, Hawaii, Minnesota, Arizona, Maine, Illinois, Utah, California, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Ohio, Amicus Curiae, 903 F.2d 1293, 10th Cir. (1990)
Is Bad-Faith the New Wilful Blindness?: The Company Directors’ Duty of Good Faith and Wilful Blindness Doctrine Under Common Law Usa (Delaware) and Uk (England): a Comparative Study