0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
119 vizualizări4 pagini
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reissued its prior decision because weather prompted the closure of the respondent's attorney's offices for two weeks and resulted in the eventual delivery of badly damaged mail. The decision was written by Member David Holmes.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reissued its prior decision because weather prompted the closure of the respondent's attorney's offices for two weeks and resulted in the eventual delivery of badly damaged mail. The decision was written by Member David Holmes.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reissued its prior decision because weather prompted the closure of the respondent's attorney's offices for two weeks and resulted in the eventual delivery of badly damaged mail. The decision was written by Member David Holmes.
CHICAGO, IL 60625-6283 Name: PATEL, DILIPKUMAR DASHRAT .. U.S. Department of Justice Executive Ofce fr Imigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Ofce of the Clerk 5107 Leeburg Pik, Suite 2000 Fals Clurcl, Vrginia 20530 OHS/ICE Ofice of Chief Counsel - HLG 1717 Zoy Street Harlingen, TX 78552 A 200-939-111 Date of this notice: 6/6/2014 Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case. Enclosure Panel Members: Holmes, David 8. Sincerely, DC c t Dona Car Chief Clerk Trane Userteam: Docket For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished I m m i g r a n t
&
R e f u g e e
A p p e l l a t e
C e n t e r
|
w w w . i r a c . n e t Cite as: Dilipkumar Dashrathbhai Patel, A200 939 111 (BIA June 6, 2014) U.S. Department of Justice Executive Ofce fr I igaton Review Falls Church, Virga 20530 File: A200 939 111 - Harlingen, TX I re: DIIKUR DASHRATHBHAI PATEL I REMOVAL PROCEEDIGS MOTION ON BEHALF OF RESPONENT: Pro se 1 Decision of te Board of Iigation Appeals Date: JUN 0 6 2014 The respondent has fled a motion requestig that we reissue te Febray 7, 2014, decision of the Board in hs proceedigs due to weather-related circumstaces whch not only closed cousel fr the respondent's offce fr two weeks, but also resulted in te eventual deliver of badly daaged mail - including the Boad's decision. The Deparent of Homelad Secuity (DHS) has not opposed the respondent's motion. Considerng the totality of the circumstaces presented, the unopposed motion is ganted. ORDER: The Boad's order of Februay 7, 2014, attached hereto, is hereby reissued and shall be teated as entered on today's date. FOR THE BOARD 1 While te motion to reissue was fled on the respondent's behalf by Attorey Fra B. Lindner, Attorey Lindner has not entered his appeaance a attorey ofrecord on a For EOI-27 (Notice of Entry of Appeaance a Attorey or Representative Befre the Boad of I igation Appeals), the Boad does not recogize Attorey Lider as the attorey of record in tis case. I m m i g r a n t
&
R e f u g e e
A p p e l l a t e
C e n t e r
|
w w w . i r a c . n e t Cite as: Dilipkumar Dashrathbhai Patel, A200 939 111 (BIA June 6, 2014) . . . .. . U.S Depaet of Justce Exe Offm Igto Rew Dson o te Bd of Im gon A FalCc Vu 20530 Fie: A00 939 111 -Haingen T I re: DIK DAHTH PAT I ROVA PROCIGS APEA Dae: ON BEF OF RSPONE: Fr B. Lide, Esui ON BEHF OF DH: Ar Burges Asstt Chef Counl APLCATON: Repeng FEB -7 2014 Te ronde a ntve a citen of Id wa orde rov i asena on Aus 25, 2011. O Mc 30, 2012 te resonden fle a motion t repe pregs, whch the Iigaion Juge dee on My I 0, 201 2. The rsponde tle a tmely appe of tt deon. Te appe wll be dismisse. Puat to ston 24)(SXC) of te Imigaon ad Natonity Ac, 8 U.S.C. 129a)(5)(C), a i asnta removal orde my be recided ony (I) upon a moton to rpe fded w 180 dys afe te dte of te orde of remova if te aien demnse tt the flue t appe wa be of ecpton cicusce or (2) upn a moton t re fe a ay te i the alen deonate t he o she did not reive notce of te heng i acrd wt sons 239(a)(l) or (2) of the Act or tat te aen wa in Feea or Stte cstody ad dd not apa tug no ft of te alien. Seons 24()(S)(C)i) a (i) o the A; see al Mater o G 22 lN De. 722 723 (I 199). We af te Imgaon Judge's desion We age t the repnden h not rebute te prmon of efeve serc by estblishing iprper deve of te notce for hs he Te rerd ret tha the Notce to Ap (A) (x 1) wa py se ad te noc fr te Augs 25, 2011, heang (OH wa sent by regla ml to t addres te responen provde. Te repnet cted tt he did not recive noce for hs heag ad in sppor of hs moton be submit ed hs ow afdvt. Howeve, te af davit lack de and wtout more, is not sfcient to overcme te pespton of prpe sc of te notc for hs heg. Thee is no edenc of recrd tt te noce for the Agst 25, 2011, hen w ree or oeis w udelveable to te respondent, s addess. Moreve, thee wee no pror applction of rrd fr relief tt wuld indice a icenve to apa a the heg. I m m i g r a n t
&
R e f u g e e
A p p e l l a t e
C e n t e r
|
w w w . i r a c . n e t , . . , ' . . A0939111 . ) I vew of th crmstnc, the reondent ha not prse sfcient evdence t overcme te premton of ppe delive of te NOH. See Mater of M-R-A-., 24 lN De. 65 (I 208). Acy, we wldss te app ORE: The ape is dismisse. FOR TBO 2 I m m i g r a n t