Group Development The stages of group development are forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning stages. Forming happens when the group members are at the stage of getting to know each other. Storming occurs when each of the group members tasks are defined and when tensions are dealt with. Norming follows when relationships are built and when the group members already work together. Performing follows when the relationships in the group and the performance of tasks have matured. This stage is when the group is pretty much stable on all aspects. Finally, adjourning takes place when the groups purpose has ended and the group celebrates their accomplishments. In the case of Christine Spencers group, the group is already at the norming stage, which they are building their relationship. The team members are already working together at this stage. However, this does not mean that problems are no longer encountered; rather, this stage requires more effort in trying to maintain the groups balance. At this stage, Christines group is already starting to work together in with the members meeting regularly, having their own assigned tasks, and starting to work on tasks. However, the main problem that the group is experiencing at this stage is the lack of cooperation from Mike. He is unable to attend most of the meetings and is unable to deliver his assigned tasks. Adding to the problem is the fact that Christine and the rest of the members seem to be indifferent to Mikes plight and dont make much of an effort to involve him. As a result, Mike feels left out, which results in social loafing. Mike then is uncooperative and distant. The understanding of the different stages of group development, Christine would have learned that just because the team has started working together, does not mean that she could already rest on her laurels so-to-speak. She would have learned that she needed to become even more vigilant in watching out for possible problems or conflicts at this stage and be able to resolve them before they get out of hand. Such conflicts can affect the groups output, and should be addressed as soon as possible.
Problem Identification Although, the primary problem in Christines group is the lack of cooperation and involvement from Mike, this is caused by secondary problems which are the lack of communication and the lack of resources that would enable each team member to perform their assigned tasks. In Mikes opinion the lack of communication, particularly about his preferred meeting schedule, was not sought and considered. Given the difficulties he was going through, he could have also used some words of encouragement or motivation from Christine. In addition, Christine should have tried harder in persuading Mike to cooperate. Also, Christine seeking Mikes feedback would have made Mike feel that his contributions were valued, which in turn would have motivated him to participate. In addition, the lack of resources became a problem in that Mike was not given the resource, particularly, and time that he needed to be able to actively participate in the groups meetings. Without addressing this problem, the group members interaction with each other and the groups cohesion as a whole, was negatively affected, which lead to the team becoming ineffective.
Retrospective Evaluation Two courses of action that can be taken to resolve the problems in Christines group include adjusting the group meeting schedules to a time when Mike would be available or making Mike feel involved by communicating the groups discussions with him and asking for his feedback via email. With the first option, Christine could have asked Mike for his available schedule when he reacted negatively to the morning schedule. Christine could have also suggested holding the meeting during lunch breaks, as everyone would surely be free at this time. Having lunch together would also enable the group to bond. Alternatively, the groups preferred meeting schedules could be retained for the most part but some of these schedules could have been adjusted to accommodate Mikes availability. This would make it easier for Mike to adjust to some of the meeting schedules and would make him feel valued. The group would make an effort to accommodate him, which would motivate him to participate more. The disadvantage of this option, is that the other group members might feel that theyre unnecessarily going out of their way for Mike or that Mike is being given special treatment, which might in turn cause some resistance from them. The other option is for Christine, as the Team coordinator, to keep Mike in the loop at all times. For example, when Mike missed a meeting, Christine could have sent him some notes on what was discussed during the meeting via email. Christine could have also asked for his feedback regarding what the team had discussed and could have use it as an opportunity to follow up on the status of Mikes task and to inform him of the groups next meeting schedule. Extra effort would make Mike feel as a part of the group, and his contributions and opinions were important. As also, sending the message via email would enable Mike to read and reply to the message during his available time, which would somehow help him in allotting time for the group project amidst of his other responsibilities. The disadvantage of this option is that it would take extra effort and time from Christine who would have other tasks and responsibilities of her own. It might also make Mike miss more of the meetings, knowing that Christine would send him notes about the meetings anyway. Reflection Christine was not an effective group leader because she was not able to facilitate the group members contributions. For example, she was not able to effectively ask Mike to contribute his talents and skills to the groups work. She also failed to encourage and motivate Mike, given that she knew about the difficulties he was experiencing. She also failed to seek Mikes feedback and suggestions and failed to communicate with Mike the groups discussions whenever he missed a meeting. She did not persuade Mike to cooperate; instead, she let Mike be irresponsible and did not try to resolve the conflicts. There was obviously one team member who was not satisfied but Christine failed to address this in a timely manner, which led to the probability of their project not being completed on time.