0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
16 vizualizări16 pagini
The purpose of the current article is to explore the relationships between HR competency and HR effectiveness in a sampling of Taiwanese high-tech firms. The issue of what comprises a particular "competency" is ubiquitous within the HRM literature. Results suggest that HR competencies of field expertise and change management are strongly related to HR effectiveness as perceived by line managers and employees.
The purpose of the current article is to explore the relationships between HR competency and HR effectiveness in a sampling of Taiwanese high-tech firms. The issue of what comprises a particular "competency" is ubiquitous within the HRM literature. Results suggest that HR competencies of field expertise and change management are strongly related to HR effectiveness as perceived by line managers and employees.
The purpose of the current article is to explore the relationships between HR competency and HR effectiveness in a sampling of Taiwanese high-tech firms. The issue of what comprises a particular "competency" is ubiquitous within the HRM literature. Results suggest that HR competencies of field expertise and change management are strongly related to HR effectiveness as perceived by line managers and employees.
HRM field have conducted a range of conceptual and prescriptive work regarding the competencies of human resource professionals. Pub- lications have focused on the types of com- petencies that HR managers should hold to be effective (e.g., Burke, 1997; Ulrich, Brock- bank, Yeung, & Lake, 1995), the roles that HR managers play in organizations (Beer, 1997; Mohrman & Lawler, 1997), and the sources of HRM competencies (Buckley & Monks, 2004). The purpose of the current article is to explore the relationships be- tween HR competency and HR effectiveness in a sampling of Taiwanese high-technology firms. The issue of what comprises a particular competency is ubiquitous within the HRM literature, and the construct is not defined consistently. Hoffmann (1999) provided a recent overview on the various meanings of competency. He cited three definitions: (1) observable performance (Boam & Sparrow, 1992; Bowden & Masters, 1993); (2) stan- dard or quality of the outcome of the per- sons performance (Hager, Athanasou, & Gonczi, 1994; Rutherford, 1995); and (3) un- THE HR COMPETENCIESHR EFFECTIVENESS LINK: A STUDY IN TAIWANESE HIGH-TECH COMPANIES JI AN HAN, PAUL CHOU, MI NSTON CHAO, AND PATRI CK M. WRI GHT This article explores the relationship between HR competencies and HR ef- fectiveness as perceived by line managers and employees within 39 surveyed Taiwanese high-tech firms. The data were collected from multiple constituen- cies in the form of four targeted surveys, and the analysis was conducted at the firm level. Respondents included 182 high-level executives, 152 HR man- agers, 320 line managers, and 1,262 employees. Results suggest that in the Taiwanese high-tech context, HR competencies of field expertise and change management are strongly related to HR effectiveness as perceived by line managers and employees, while business knowledge is not. Managerial im- plications and future research direction are also discussed in the article. This study contributes to a better understanding of HRM competencies and HR ef- fectiveness within an international context. 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Correspondence to: Jian Han, Department of Organizational Management, Guanghua School of Manage- ment, Peking University, Beijing, China 100871, Phone: +86 1062756275, Fax: +86 1062751463, E-mail: jianhan@gsm.pku.edu.cn Human Resource Management, Fall 2006, Vol. 45, No. 3, Pp. 391406 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20114 392 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, Fall 2006 derlying attributes of a person (Boyatzis, 1982; Sternberg & Kolligian, 1990). He also argued that the rationale for the use of com- petencies could determine the definition given to the term in a particular instance. In this article, we define and measure HR competency using Hoffmans third perspec- tive. In this view, we relate competency to a persons underlying attributes, such as their knowledge, skills, or abilities. This definition fo- cuses on the efforts required by individuals in order for them to be competent or effective in their workplace performance. This definition differs from the other definitions of competency in which the term is treated as a measure of individual output (Hoffmann, 1999). The approach that defines competency as individual knowl- edge, skills, and/or abilities is not new. American scholar David Ul- rich and his University of Michi- gan colleagues (i.e., Wayne Brockbank, Dale Lake, and Arthur Yeung) have taken similar approaches when defining and measuring competencies (e.g., Becker, Huselid, & Ulrich, 2001; Ulrich et al., 1995). From 1988 to 1998, they continually developed and empirically tested dimensions of HR competency. Their resulting data supported at least three com- petency domainsknowledge of business, field expertise, and change management. Be- cause this competency stream is so far the most comprehensive within the literature, we chose to adopt it as our framework to as- sess HR competency in the study we con- ducted in Taiwan. HRM and HR Competency Research in Taiwan For the past two decades, the fast-changing business marketplace in Taiwan has forced companies on the island to increasingly ex- hibit dynamic capabilities to maintain their edge. These attributes include agility, flexi- bility, self-renewal, and the ability to quickly develop and learn new commercial applica- tions. While Taiwan has become an impor- tant source for a variety of products and serv- ices in the global marketplace, the nation has faced keen competition from other de- veloped and developing countries. In order to maintain its competitive advantage, Tai- wanese firms have increasingly recognized and emphasized HRMs importance in meet- ing their objectives. HRMs history as a major profession in Taiwan is not long. Its emergence there has been driven by environmental changes such as globalization and the rapid pace of tech- nological change. Since multinational com- panies, including RCA, General Instruments, and Motorola, entered Taiwan in the 1970s, the nations enterprises began practicing in- dustrial relations (IR) management. Al- though such foreign firms brought knowl- edge of employee relations into Taiwan, most HRM over the past decade simply fo- cused on traditional personnel administra- tion practices (Zhu, Chen, & Warner, 2000). However, continuing technological ad- vancement moved the Taiwanese economic structure from a labor-intensive to a more technology- and/or capital-intensive market- place. Enterprises gradually began to realize they could not compete in world markets without maintaining competent human cap- ital. Consequently, companies have become more willing to invest in people and have utilized HRM practices to enhance their human capital (Huang, 2003). Winning the war for talent has become a pragmatic issue of survival, and as this need has become more critical, well-trained HRM professionals have moved from for- eign-invested companies to local firms. This movement has accelerated the diffu- sion of HRM knowledge and practices within the Taiwanese business community. In addition, some leading universities such as the National Central University and Na- tional Sun Yat-Sen University moved to es- tablish HRM graduate programs in the early 1990s. The programs have provided a steady supply of HRM professionals to Tai- wanese firms. For the past two decades, the fast- changing business marketplace in Taiwan has forced companies on the island to increasingly exhibit dynamic capabilities to maintain their edge. Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm The HR CompetenciesHR Effectiveness Link: A Study In Taiwanese High-Tech Companies 393 The field has also become of far greater interest to the management research com- munity, indicating its importance to both academia and business. Liu, Pang, and Lin (2003) analyzed Taiwanese HRM trends by reviewing 117 HRM articles from seven local management periodicals (five of them are listed in the Taiwan Social Science Cita- tion Index) from 1993 to 2002. Results in- dicate that the number of HRM articles more than tripled, growing from seven in 1993 to 23 published in 2002. This dramatic increase within a decade reflects HRMs prominence within the management field in Taiwan. We have developed our study with the following factors in mind. First, while the HR function has become an important factor in helping organizations achieve a competitive advantage (e.g., Becker & Huselid, 1998; Wright & Snell, 1998), the knowledge, skills, and capabilities of professionals who de- velop and implement HRM practices have not been thoroughly studied within Asia. HRM as a management field is in its rela- tively early stages in Asia compared to its Western counterparts. Second, we acknowledge that HR effec- tiveness is a very broad construct, and con- ceptually it should reflect diverse needs and desires. Most related studies offer HR effec- tiveness ratings only from high-level execu- tives and not from other organizational con- stituencies. In this study, we take a different perspective and use HR effectiveness rated by line managers and employees as the de- pendent variables. In other words, we assess the performance of HR professionals as in- ternal service providers to employees and line managers. Third, in practice, Taiwanese companies have learned and adopted considerable HR knowledge, techniques, and methods from Western counterparts and multinational firms to formalize their HR practices since the 1970s (Zhu et al., 2000). Yet there is lim- ited evidence that Western HR competency models are transferable to the Taiwanese context. These Western models may have limited implications for recruiting, selecting, and educating Taiwanese HR professionals. Finally, our study design has some methodological advantages in that we have directly collected HR competency and HR ef- fectiveness data from multiple sources. They include executives, HR managers, line man- agers, and employees. This provides a more balanced and less biased view, with the aim of providing incremental insights into the research and development of Taiwanese HR professional competencies. Hypothesis Development Our study analyzes the relation- ship between HR competencies and perceived HR effectiveness within Taiwanese firms. The hy- pothesized relationship is based on both scholarly studies and practical considerations. In previ- ous strategic HRM research, sev- eral studies considered the effec- tiveness of HRM professionals in enhancing business planning processes and organizational ef- fectiveness. For example, based on institu- tional theory, Huselid, Jackson, and Schuler (1997) argued that HRM could gain legitimacy and acceptance from stakeholders by meeting or exceeding expecta- tions. Specifically, organizations can maximize HR effectiveness by having HR professionals who pos- sess field expertise such as recruit- ing, training, and compensation in order to provide the best possi- ble internal services to employees and line managers. HR profes- sionals should also have business competencies that enable them to design a series of internally consistent HR policies and practices that contribute to their firms business objectives. Furthermore, drawn from theories of or- ganizational life cycles, structures, power, population, and ecology, Welbourne and her colleagues measured HRs value in part by ex- amining whether firms had human resource departments (Welbourne & Andrews, 1996) the knowledge, skills, and capabilities of professionals who develop and implement HRM practices have not been thoroughly studied within Asia. HRM as a management field is in its relatively early stages in Asia compared to its Western counterparts. Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm 394 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, Fall 2006 and whether such firms had HR executives who directly reported to CEOs (Welbourne & Cyr, 1999). Their study results suggest that firms in actively changing or fast- growing companies most likely benefit from having HR depart- ments or by having senior HRM executives reporting to a firms CEO, thus implying that HRM may serve as a catalyst to add value for such organizations. The relationship between HR competency and HR effectiveness is also of great concern to corpo- rate executives and HR profes- sionals. As the strategic role of HRM is emphasized and invest- ment in HRM practices is in- creased, organizations begin to seek answers about the effective- ness of their HR departments. Questions remain regarding whether HR functions respond adequately to help organizations adjust to changing business envi- ronments, conduct business ef- fectively, and/or provide services that meet internal customer needs. Because the function is made up of a number of HR pro- fessionals, one would expect competencies to be related to HR effectiveness. Any profession consists of a body of knowledge and/or a set of skills by which the profession is defined, and the field of HR is no different. Again, HR competency in this study is defined as HR staff members knowledge, skills, and capabilities that directly influ- ence HR functions and perform- ance. As noted, Ulrich et al. (1995) identified three general competencies required of HR executives: business knowledge, field expert- ise, and change management. In our study, we discuss how these three competencies af- fect HR effectiveness perceived by HR inter- nal customers: line managers and employees. If, in fact, the human capital within Tai- wanese businesses is becoming more and more important to success in a competitive marketplace, then one would expect that those tasked with the responsibility for de- signing, developing, and, in some cases, de- livering the systems that attract, select, train, motivate, and retain human capital would be a critical resource. As such, others within the organization would develop reasonably strong opinions regarding the performance of the HR function. In forming these evaluations of how well HRM contributes to business success, HR stakeholders would likely consider general acquisition, motivation, and retention of employees an important part of the HR func- tion. Thus, the extent to which stakeholders believe that systems and processes for ac- complishing such objectives are effectively developed and implemented strongly relate to their beliefs of HR effectiveness. Hypothesis 1: Firm-level HR staffs field expert- ise is positively related to HR effectiveness as perceived by employees and line managers. Second, while the general acquisition, motivation, and retention of talent is impor- tant, these processes must be aligned with business needs. In one sense, this step deals with fitting practices to strategy, but more generally, it entails respondents believing that HR professionals understand the impor- tant levers of the business (e.g., product de- mand cycles, cost concerns, and other fac- tors) and are acquiring, motivating, and retaining people in ways that enable the business to achieve its operational and fi- nancial objectives. Accordingly, the extent to which respondents believe that those in the HR function have knowledge of the busi- ness will rate them more favorably in terms of effectiveness. Hypothesis 2: Firm-level HR staffs knowledge of business competency is positively related to HR effectiveness as perceived by employees and line managers. Third, drawn from scholarly and practi- tioner literature (Lawler & Mohrman, 2000, 2003; Ulrich et al., 1995), HR change-man- Questions remain regarding whether HR functions respond adequately to help organizations adjust to changing business environments, conduct business effectively, and/or provide services that meet internal customer needs. Because the function is made up of a number of HR professionals, one would expect competencies to be related to HR effectiveness. Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm The HR CompetenciesHR Effectiveness Link: A Study In Taiwanese High-Tech Companies 395 agement competency must include knowl- edge of and being sensitive to the organiza- tions internal and external environment, in- volvement in organizational planning, design and development of strategies, and being able to apply HR information systems to gather and analyze employee data in ways that contribute to forming and implement- ing organizational development or change. Rapid economic development in the wider Asia Pacific region and increasing competi- tion beyond this region has prompted Tai- wanese firms to continue to develop their dynamic capabilities such as flexibility, self- renewal, and the ability to learn quickly. As a consequence, Taiwanese firm HR stakehold- ers expect the HR function not only to fulfill their traditional administrative role, but also to perform as an internal change agent or leader to support strategic initiatives, to help upgrade employee skills and knowledge, and eventually to help to create an overall capac- ity to change and develop the organization. Hypothesis 3: Firm-level HR staffs change-man- agement competency is positively related to HR effectiveness perceived by employees and line managers. Methods Survey Procedure and Sample Using a survey, we collected data from 39 companies in Taiwan during the fall of 2004. We began by sending invitations and mak- ing phone calls to executives in 65 compa- nies. Forty companies agreed to participate. At the time of data analysis, 39 companies returned their documents. More than 90% of participating compa- nies are local firms in the technology sector. The firms produce a diverse array of products, including computer software, computer hardware, semiconductors, telecommunica- tions, and bio-tech products. More than 65% of the firms have survived more than a decade, while 35% are less than ten years old. Fifty-one percent of the firms have more than 500 employees, 41% have 100500 staffers, and 8% employ fewer than 100 people. We asked company contacts to estimate the surveys required and sent packets con- taining appropriate numbers of four survey versions to be distributed to four sets of re- spondents within each firm: executives, HR managers, line managers, and employees. HR competency data were collected from execu- tives and HR professionals, because we be- lieved these groups held the best under- standing of HR knowledge, skills, and abilities. HR effectiveness ratings were col- lected from line managers and employees, since these groups are internal HR customers with the most to say about its effectiveness. To better separate the survey versions for analysis, we used sep- arate titles and different paper colors to distinguish each. We also provided sealed envelopes to help ensure confidentiality of re- turned documents. We sent 2,281 surveys. Among the 1,916 returned, 182 were completed by high-level ex- ecutives, a response rate of 73.4%; 152 were from HR managers (re- sponse rate of 87.4%); 320 were line managers (response rate of 77.3%); and 1,262 were nonman- agerial employees (response rate of 87.4%). The final overall sam- ple included 39 firms and more than 1,900 observations at the individual level. These re- sponse rates are unusually high in strategic HRM research. Our survey design allowed us to avoid single-response bias and ensured more reli- able measures by collecting data from multi- ple respondents in each group (Gerhart, Wright, McMahan, & Snell, 2000). Two is- sues have plagued much of firm-level HRM research. First, a number of studies have used single respondents for all study measures (both independent and dependent vari- ables), resulting in the possibility of com- mon method or percept-percept bias in ob- served relationships. Second, using only single respondents has been demonstrated to result in unreliable organizational-level measures (Wright, Gardner, et al., 2001). In Our survey design allowed us to avoid single-response bias and ensured more reliable measures by collecting data from multiple respondents in each group. Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm 396 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, Fall 2006 our study, the average numbers of execu- tives, HR managers, line managers, and em- ployees who returned the survey from each firm were five, four, eight, and 32, respec- tively. These numbers allowed us to examine relationships without concern for common method variance, and to provide more reli- able measures than would have been possi- ble with single respondents. In later sections, we will assess firm-level variable reliability and discuss related issues. Instrument and Measures Whenever applicable, we use established measures. As noted, most HR competency items were adapted from the established measures of Ulrich et al. (1995). The instru- ment was first independently translated into Chinese by three HR researchers. They met to discuss their translations and provided a single version of a Chinese inventory. Two bilinguals who had no knowledge of the original English inventories then independ- ently translated the Chinese inventory back into English. They met for a discussion and provided a single version of the translation. A native-English speaker then examined the two versions of the English inventories. Any discrepancies between the two versions were verified in the Chinese translation for accu- racy. These procedures were followed to en- sure the translated versions were comparable to the originals in English (Brislin, 1970). HR competency measures were included in the surveys provided to executives and HR managers. HR effectiveness measures were included in the executive surveys, the line manager surveys, and employee surveys. All four versions consisted of company and in- dividual profile items. HR Competency HR competencies measured 33 items adapted from the HR professional competency items developed by Ulrich et al. (1995). These items cover three aspects of HRM competen- cies, including business knowledge, field ex- pertise, and change management. These items are listed in Appendix A. HR Effectiveness HR effectiveness was assessed by ten items (see Appendix B) generated by Wright, McMahan, Snell, and Gerhart (2001). These items were used to evaluate line-manager and employee perceptions of HR effective- ness. Results Our analyses consisted of two phases. In the first phase, we used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to reveal three-dimensional structures of the HR competency construct. CFA was conducted at the individual level. In the second phase, we aggregated individ- ual responses from each firm at the firm level and conducted regression analysis to verify the hypothesized relationships between HR competency and effectiveness. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of HRM Competencies Since our survey items on HR competency were adapted from the HR professional com- petency items by Ulrich et al. (1995), we used CFA to confirm that our dataset col- lected from Taiwanese firms exhibited a three-dimensional structure. We first com- Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm Chi-square (CMIN) DF CMIN/DF NFI RFI IFI CFI RMSEA Three-factor correlated model 1662 492 3.38 0.958 0.952 0.970 0.970 0.086 T A B L E I Model Fit of CFA Model on HR Competency Data Collected from Executives and HR Managers (Analysis Conducted at Individual Level) The HR CompetenciesHR Effectiveness Link: A Study In Taiwanese High-Tech Companies 397 bined the survey results from executives and HR managers to form a single dataset in which each firm contained survey results from an average of eight individuals. We then used AMOS 4.0 to conduct CFA at the individual level over the 33 items on HR competency. Goodness-of-fit indices are in- cluded in Table I. The discrepancy/df (CMIN/DF) index is 3.38, which is marginal. Usually between 2 and 3 is considered ac- ceptable (Carmines & McIver, 1981). The normal fit index is 0.96, which is acceptable (Bentler & Bonett, 1980). The relative fit index (RFI) and incremental fit index are 0.95 and 0.97, respectively. Both values are close to 1 and are reasonable. The compara- tive fit index (CFI) compares the model with the baseline independence model and is 0.97, above the 0.90 acceptable range. The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of the model is 0.086, which is weakly acceptable (Browne, Cudeck, Bollen, & Long, 1993). Overall, we felt that the model fit of the HR competency with three- dimensional data were acceptable, but the fit was not so strong. We further looked into reasons why the model fit is not strong. We found that one particular reason is that the field expertise factor has strong correlation with the change management factor (r = 0.797, p < 0.001) from the CFA result (Table II). Further analysis using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) from the executive data, and then CFA with data from the HR manager and staff, show that a two-factor structure in which field expertise and change management were combined into one factor had a better fit, but the advantage was not substantial. Therefore, for hypothesis testing, we still used the three-factor structure with existing items developed by Ulrich et al. (1995). The results for the above EFA and CFA on two- factor structure are available from the au- thors but are omitted from this article. Relationship Between HR Competency and Perceived HR Effectiveness To test the main hypotheses, we needed to regress perceived HR effectiveness measured from line managers and employees on the HR competencies measured from executives and HR managers. Since these measures were collected from difference sources, our regres- sions needed to be completed at the firm level. Thus, as a first step, we aggregated in- dividual-level measures on the three HR competency dimensions as well as perceived HR effectiveness to the firm level. The aggre- gation process is displayed in Figure 1, with dotted arrow lines indicating the data aggre- gation from individual level to firm level and the solid arrow lines indicating the positive relationship between HRM competencies and HR effectiveness. We assessed the reliability of the data ag- gregation by analyzing the intraclass correla- tions (ICCs) of each measure. Results are re- ported in Table III. For our purposes, ICC(2) is a direct measure of aggregation reliability, since it reflects the reliability of the means of the firm-level measures aggregated from in- dividual-level values. The results show that perceived HR effectiveness has excellent ag- gregation reliability (ICC(2) = 0.83), while HR competency measures have marginal reli- ability. The main reason is that perceived HR effectiveness is aggregated from an average Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 1. Field expertise Factor 2. Business knowledge 0.542*** Factor 3. Change management 0.797*** 0.458*** *** p < 0.001 T A B L E I I Correlation Matrix from the CFA Analysis 398 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, Fall 2006 of 40 individuals in each firm, while the HR competency measures are only aggregated from an average of eight individuals. An- other possible reason is that the survey data do not reflect strong enough rater agreement within each firm and strong enough hetero- geneity between the firms (as shown by low ICC(1) values), which is consistent with past research (Gerhart, Wright, McMahan, & Snell, 2000a). After aggregating individual-level meas- ures to the firm level, we computed descrip- tive statistics of the measures (shown in Table IV). The Cronbachs alphas show the reliability of measures when averaged among all survey items used to develop the corre- sponding measure. All measures have good reliability, indicating that the measures de- veloped from survey items are reliable. We also tested the normality of the measures, which indicates whether the data distribu- tion of a measure is normally distributed, a requirement needed for regression analysis. All four measures passed the normality test. The correlations among HR competency measures match the analysis from CFA (Table II): all three measures positively correlate, with field expertise and change management highly correlated (r = 0.856, p < 0.001). The correlations between the HR competency measures and perceived HR effectiveness show that field expertise and change man- Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm FIGURE 1. Aggregation of the Individual Variables to the Firm-Level Variables Within-Firm Between-Firm K = Number of Variance 2 Variance Raters per Firm ICC (1) ICC(2) Field expertise 0.638*** 0.093* 8.31 0.13 0.55 Business knowledge 0.666*** 0.088* 8.31 0.12 0.52 Change management 0.728*** 0.068* 8.31 0.09 0.44 Perceived HR effectiveness 0.847*** 0.104*** 39.90 0.11 0.83 a * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. ICC (1) = /(+ 2 ), ICC(2)= K * ICC1 / [ 1 + (K-1)* ICC1]. T A B L E I I I Intraclass Correlations for Competency and Effectiveness Measures a The HR CompetenciesHR Effectiveness Link: A Study In Taiwanese High-Tech Companies 399 agement are positively correlated, while the correlation between business knowledge and perceived HR effectiveness is not significant. To test Hypotheses 1 to 3, we regressed the measure of perceived HR effectiveness on each of the measures of HR competency. For each regression, we added firm size as a con- trol variable since the difference in a firms size may affect its HR profile and compe- tency. Results are reported in Table V. Our results also show that field expertise and change management have strong posi- tive relationships to perceived HR effective- ness after adding controls based on a firms size. The F-values of the regressions are 9.37 with p < 0.001 and 5.91 with p < 0.01, and the regression weights are 0.49 with p < 0.001 and 0.40 with p < 0.01. However, busi- ness knowledge has an insignificant relation- ship with perceived HR effectiveness (both the F-value and the regression weight are in- significant). Therefore, our regression results strongly support Hypotheses 1 and 3 but re- ject Hypothesis 2. Furthermore, we put all three HR compe- tency measures together in a regression to test their combined effects on HR effective- ness. Results show that the effects are signif- icant (F-value = 4.86 with p < 0.01), and among the three HR competencies, field ex- pertise has a positive and significant effect on perceived HR effectiveness (regression Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm Cronbachs Correlations Mean S.D. alphas 1 2 3 1. Field expertise 4.827 0.432 0.95 2. Business knowledge 5.228 0.435 0.91 0.614*** 3. Change management 4.908 0.445 0.89 0.856*** 0.395* 4. Perceived HR effectiveness 4.829 0.363 0.94 0.572*** 0.092* 0.483** * p <0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p < 0.001. N = 39. T A B L E I V Descriptive Statistics, Correlations, and Reliability Measures for the Constructs Model 1. Field Model 2. Business Model 3. Change Model 4. All expertise to knowledge to management to competency measures perceived HR perceived HR perceived HR to perceived effectiveness effectiveness effectiveness HR effectiveness Field expertise 0.488*** 0.678* Business knowledge 0.223 0.168 Change management 0.401** 0.095 Firm size 0.041 0.014 0.041 0.054 Adjusted R-square 0.306 0.025 0.205 0.289 F-value 9.367*** 1.490 5.914** 4.856** a * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. T A B L E V Regressions of the Measure of Perceived HR Effectiveness on HR Competency Measures a 400 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, Fall 2006 weight = 0.68 with p < 0.05). The effects of business knowledge and change manage- ment are not significant. Business knowledge is not correlated with perceived HR effective- ness, while change management holds a high correlation with field expertise, and thus there is high collinearity in the regres- sion. Discussion The data analysis of this study reveals several results. First, the HR competency of field expertise was a strong predictor of per- ceived HR effectiveness. Within this sample, the results suggest that in the minds of two major constituencies, line managers and employees, the most effec- tive HR operations are those with professionals who are well skilled in HR basics. Second, business knowledge was virtually unrelated to per- ceived HR effectiveness. This re- sult runs counter to the basic HR paradigm within the United States, which presupposes that business acumen among HR pro- fessionals is one of the most critical factors necessary for HR success. However, several possible explanations exist for this result. From the ICC analysis (Table III), we notice that business knowledge has low ICC(2) val- ues, indicating that data aggregation is not reliable for firm-level, individual ratings of this competency. The correspondent be- tween-firm variances are insignificant, im- plying that there is little within-firm agree- ment on the ratings. Such disagreement may be due to differing perceptions among indi- viduals on HR business knowledge or simply difficulty in observing such knowledge in daily practice. Further, our stakeholder groups, line managers and employees, may not truly be in a position to evaluate HR business knowl- edge, because this competency is unlikely to be observed by them directly, and this knowledge would have an impact only at higher organizational levels. One could hy- pothesize that had we assessed effectiveness from the standpoint of executives, we might have found a stronger relationship between such business knowledge and effectiveness. Finally, the nonsignificant result be- tween business knowledge and HR effective- ness may indicate that HRM in Taiwan is mostly a personnel management function rather than a strategic partner in firm opera- tions. If HR staff mainly deals with field-spe- cific functions such as recruiting and train- ing without gaining much knowledge of the companys operations, business knowledge would be perceived as less important. The HR function in Taiwanese firms has a shorter development history than its American counterparts, and it may take more time for Taiwan HR professionals to become strategic decision makers. In addition, the change-management competency in HR demonstrates mixed re- sults across single and multiple regressions as a predictor of perceived HR effectiveness. Two insights might be drawn from these re- sults. On the one hand, the analysis may in- dicate that the dimensional construct of HR competency distinctions, such as between the factors of field expertise and change management, may require further explo- ration. Second, the significant result of the single regression shows that items measuring change management may be a strong predic- tor of perceived HR effectiveness. Therefore knowledge, skills, and abilities included in this dimension should also be considered as required competencies for successful HR pro- fessionals in Taiwan. Practical Implications For practicing managers in Taiwan and for- eign firms who are willing to have business relationships with Taiwanese firms, our study results may bolster the argument that HR field expertise may be the most impor- tant factor in pleasing HR internal cus- tomers. As a consequence, our study suggests that professional training and education for such professionals should focus on basics such as field knowledge. This knowledge in- The HR function in Taiwanese firms has a shorter development history than its American counterparts, and it may take more time for Taiwan HR professionals to become strategic decision makers. Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm The HR CompetenciesHR Effectiveness Link: A Study In Taiwanese High-Tech Companies 401 cludes recruiting, staffing, training, and compensation, all of which are perceived as strong predictors of HR effectiveness by line managers and employees. Further, although change management is not a significant predictor of HR effective- ness in the multiple regression due to multi- collinearity, the significant result of the sin- gle regression between change management and HR effectiveness suggests that HR pro- fessionals in Taiwan are also likely to in- crease their effectiveness if they master the skills and abilities necessary to support a companys strategic planning and change management. Specific skills in this regard may include applying human resources in- formation systems to collect and analyze data in ways that support strategic decision making; adapting HR activities to internal and external change; and building relation- ships necessary for change. Limitations and Future Research It is important to address our studys relative strengths and weaknesses. First, with regard to sample size, the 39 firms we surveyed pro- vide limited power for testing relationships at the firm level. However, despite limited statistical power, significant results were still observed. In addition, while the N of 39 seems small, it actually reflects the aggrega- tion of more than 1,900 responses. Second, although we took great effort to increase reliability through the aggregation across multiple respondents, some reliability problems remained. As Gerhart, Wright, McMahan, and Snell (2000) and Gerhart, Wright, and McMahan (2000) have demon- strated, single-respondent measures of orga- nizational phenomena are sometimes unreli- able, and the use of multiple respondents can result in more reliable findings. In this study, we intended to increase the reliability of the study by using multiple responses from multiple sources within organizations. This intense data-collection effort enabled us to gather information from an average of five executives per firm, four HR managers, eight line managers, and 32 employees. However, the effort may have resulted in less than ideal data-aggregation reliability (i.e., ICC(2)). Future research could improve reliabil- ity from two perspectives. First, the ques- tionnaires could be designed more carefully to improve within-firm agreement. In our survey, we asked about business knowledge among HR professionals. This factor may have been difficult for raters to assess as a competency dimension if they had not di- rectly observed relevant behaviors during daily contact with HR professionals. There- fore, ratings are likely to be in- consistent across different raters from one organization, leading to low data-aggregation reliabil- ity. Second, although we col- lected data from multiple sources within an organization, we need to include additional respondents from each of the sources to achieve greater relia- bility. And, in future studies, we may need to include both per- ceptual and objective measures (cost per hire, time to hire, and/or turnover) to better meas- ure HR effectiveness. Third, to some extent, our data confirmed the three-factor construct of HR competency de- veloped by Ulrich et al. (1995) namely, knowledge of business, field expert- ise, and change management. However, additional EFA and CFA show that a two-fac- tor construct, with business knowledge as one factor and a combination of field ex- pertise and change management as another factor is a better fit for our dataset. This re- sult may be due to the raters in our sample perceiving that both HR field expertise and change management represent the people side of the organization, whereas business knowledge in general represents the strat- egy side. We remain uncertain. Finally, a related issue is that in this study we used some items created in the Western context a decade ago to measure HR compe- tencies. Additional items should be included to measure current HR professional compe- tencies in Taiwan, in part to see whether the although we took great effort to increase reliability through the aggregation across multiple respondents, some reliability problems remained. Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm 402 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, Fall 2006 construct is bound by social or cultural con- cerns. In addition, it would be useful to have some objective, non-questionnaire-based measures of HR effectiveness to gauge the va- lidity of the perceptual measures. Conclusion While HRM has become more important in the increasingly competitive business envi- ronment that characterizes Taiwan, our study reveals that the strategic side of HRM may currently be of limited value. Impor- tant HR stakeholders seem to consider effec- tiveness of HR as consisting of delivering traditional HR services and programs. This situation certainly existed in the United States up until 10 to 15 years ago. We expect that such a transformation in Taiwan may mirror that of the U.S. situation, with an in- creasing emphasis on business knowledge and the strategic side of HR being ob- served by HR professionals within the not- so-distant future. Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm JIAN HAN is an assistant professor of human resource management and organizational behavior in the Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, China. She earned her PhD in human resource studies from the School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University. Dr. Hans research interests include strategic human resource man- agement, employee recruitment, employer brand, diversity management, human re- source competency, and multilevel analysis. Her research has been accepted for publica- tion in journals such as Personnel Psychology, Organizational Research Methods, and the Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings. Dr. Han is also one of the key investi- gators in a strategic HRM project funded by the National Science Foundation of China. PAUL CHOU is a doctoral candidate in human resource management in the School of Management, National Central University, Taiwan. He has worked as an HR practitioner for 28 years in several multinational companies, such as Arthur Andersen, Payless Shoe Source, Dow Chemical, Motorola, and General Instruments. Before enrolling in the PhD program in 2002, he was senior HR vice president of Compal Computer Co., a local Tai- wanese company that is ranked fifth in the manufacturing section in Taiwan. His current research interests include human and social capital development, competency-based management, performance management, and leadership development. He has pub- lished two articles in Chinese about social capital and community development. MINSTON CHAO is a PhD candidate in human resource management at National Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan. He was a visiting student at the School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University. He has authored numerous articles and conference papers on strategic human resource management and labor relations. He has worked for multinational companies as an HR manager for many years. Now he is an associate director at KPMG Taiwan. His current research interests include strategic human resource management, competence management, and labor relations. He has worked with or- ganizations in the areas of staffing, performance management, compensation manage- ment, training and development, organizational survey, 360-degree feedback, compe- tence management, labor-management relations, and labor laws. He has taught HRM in the Health Care Department at Chang Gung University, Taiwan, since 1997. An award- winning teacher and trainer, he is active in consulting and executive development activ- ities for corporations and health care organizations. The HR CompetenciesHR Effectiveness Link: A Study In Taiwanese High-Tech Companies 403 REFERENCES Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High perform- ance work systems and work performance: A syn- thesis of research and managerial implications. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 53101). Stamford, CT: JAI Press. Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy and per- formance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Beer, M. (1997). The transformation of the human re- source function: Resolving the tension between a traditional administrative and a new strategic role. Human Resource Management, 36, 4936. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covari- ance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588600. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185216. Boam, R., & Sparrow, P. (1992). Designing and achiev- ing competency. London: McGraw-Hill. Bowden, J., & Masters, G. (1993), Implications for higher education of a competency-based approach to education and training. Canberra: AGPS. Boyatzis, R. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. New York: Wiley. Browne, M., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K., & Long, K. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Buckley, F., & Monks, K. (2004). The implications of meta-qualities for HR roles. Human Resource Man- agement Journal, 14(4), 4157. Burke, W. (1997). What human resource practitioners need to know for the twenty first century. Human Resource Management, 36, 7179. Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing mod- els with unobserved variables: Analysis of covari- ance structures. In G. W. Bohmstedt & E. F. Bor- gatta (Eds.), Social measurement (pp. 65115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gerhart, B., Wright, P., & McMahan, G. (2000). Mea- surement error and estimates of the HRFirm per- formance relationship: Further evidence and analy- sis. Personnel Psychology, 53, 855872. Gerhart, B., Wright, P., McMahan, G., & Snell, S. (2000). Research on human resource decisions and firm performance: How much error is there, and how does it influence effect size estimates? Per- sonnel Psychology, 53, 803834. Hager, P., Athanasou, J., & Gonczi, A. (1994). Assess- ment technical manual. Canberra: AGPS. Hoffmann, T. (1999). The meanings of competency. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(6), 275285. Huang, J. C. (2003, January). Human capital invest- ment system, innovation strategy and organiza- tional performance: A test of alternative forms of fit. Management Review (in Chinese), pp. 99126. Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997) Technical and strategic human resource manage- ment effectiveness as determinants of firm per- formance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 171188. Lawler, E. E., III, & Mohrman, S. A. (2000). Beyond the vision: What makes HR effective? Human Resource Planning, 23(4), 1020. Lawler, E. E., III, & Mohrman, S. A. (2003). HR as a strategic partner: What does it take to make it hap- pen? Human Resource Planning, 26(3), 1529. Liu, N., Pang, P., & Lin, C. (2003). Human resource management research in Taiwan (19932002): Re- Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm PATRICK M. WRIGHT is a professor of human resource studies and director of the Cen- ter for Advanced Human Resource Studies in the School of Industrial and Labor Rela- tions, Cornell University. He holds a BA in psychology from Wheaton College and an MBA and PhD in organizational behavior/human resource management from Michigan State University. Dr. Wright teaches, conducts research, and consults in the area of strategic human resource management, particularly focusing on how firms use people as a source of competitive advantage. He has published over 50 research articles in jour- nals, as well as more than 20 chapters in books and edited volumes. He currently serves on eight editorial boards. 404 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, Fall 2006 view and prospect. Journal of Human Resource Management (in Chinese), 5(3), 107137. Mohrman, S. A., & Lawler, E. E. (1997). Transforming the human resource function. In D. Ulrich, M. R. Casey, & G. Lake (Eds.), Tomorrows HR manage- ment (pp. 241249). New York: Wiley. Rutherford, P. (1995). Competency based assessment. Melbourne, AUS: Pitman. Sternberg, R., & Kolligian J., Jr. (1990). Competence considered. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Yeung, A. K., & Lake, D. G. (1995). Human resource competencies: An empiri- cal assessment. Human Resource Management, 34, 473495. Welbourne, T. M., & Andrews, A. O. (1996). Predicting the performance of initial public offerings: Should human resource management be in the equation? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 891919. Welbourne, T. M., & Cyr, L. A. (1999). The human re- source executive effect in initial public offering firms. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 616629. Wright, P., Gardner, T., Moynihan, L., Park, H., Gerhart, B., & Delery, J. (2001). Measurement error in re- search on human resources and firm performance: Additional data and suggestions for future re- search. Personnel Psychology, 54, 875902. Wright, P., McMahan, G., Snell, S., & Gerhart, B. (2001). Comparing line and HR executives percep- tions of HR effectiveness: Services, roles, and con- tributions. Human Resource Management Journal, 40, 111124. Wright, P. W., & Snell, S. (1998). Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strate- gic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 23, 756772. Zhu, Y., Chen, I., & Warner, M. (2000). HRM in Taiwan: An empirical case study. Human Resource Man- agement Journal, 10(4), 3244. Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm The HR CompetenciesHR Effectiveness Link: A Study In Taiwanese High-Tech Companies 405 Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm Knowledge of Business 1. The HR professionals in our company are knowledgeable about our companys business model. 2. The HR professionals in our company are knowledgeable about our companys profit chain. 3. The HR professionals in our company are knowledgeable about our companys organizational structure. 4. The HR professionals in our company are knowledgeable about the high-tech industry in Taiwan. 5. The HR professionals in our company are knowledgeable about our companys short-term strategy. 6. The HR professionals in our company are knowledgeable about our companys long-term strategy. 7. The HR professionals in our company are knowledgeable about the functional roles and responsibilities of other departments within this company. 8. The HR professionals in our company are knowledgeable about the companys external environment (e.g., customers, government legal regulations, competitors, third-party business partners, etc.). 9. Overall, our companys HR department has strong knowledge in our companys business operation. HR Functional Expertise 10. The HR professionals in our company are effective in recruiting, promoting, and placing appropriate peo- ple who fit the job description and requirements. 11. The HR professionals in our company are effective in recruiting, promoting, and placing appropriate peo- ple whose values match the organizations values. 12. The HR professionals in our company can develop and organize training programs that meet the needs of other functional departments. 13. The HR professionals in our company can offer career planning services to employees in need. 14. The HR professionals in our company can develop a competitive compensation system with line man- agers to improve on recruiting and retention objectives. 15. The HR professionals in our company can design a nonfinancial motivational system with line managers to improve recruitment and retention of internal and external talented individuals. 16. The HR professionals in our company can design an employee benefits system. 17. The HR professionals in our company can develop a performance evaluation system that assists other de- partments in achieving their business goals. 18. The HR professionals in our company can assist in establishing and communicating clear performance standards to employees. 19. The HR professionals in our company can develop performance appraisal systems that differentiate be- tween employee performance levels (good vs. bad?). 20. The HR professionals in our company can work with managers to communicate clear and consistent mes- sages for internal communication. 21. The HR professionals in our company can explain why business practices exist. 22. The HR professionals in our company can provide line managers with valuable insights or advice to im- prove management of their staff. 23. The HR professionals in our company can help line managers handle problem employees. 24. The HR professionals in our company can assist in facilitating the process of restructuring the organization. 25. The HR professionals in our company can assist in facilitating the integration of different business functions. 26. Overall, the HR staffs in our company have strong HR field expertise. Managing Change 27. The HR professionals in our company can use up-to-date methods and technologies to accomplish my functional goals (e.g., online recruiting, e-learning). 28. The HR professionals in our company can adapt HR practices and services in response to changes in in- ternal conditions (e.g., structural change, strategy change, size, mergers and acquisitions). 29. The HR professionals in our company can adapt HR practices and services in response to changes in ex- ternal conditions (e.g., labor market conditions, competitor retaliation, labor laws and regulations). 30. The HR professionals in our company can use information data as a source to influence colleagues. 31. The HR professionals in our company can take a proactive role in bringing about change. 32. The HR professionals in our company can establish relationships necessary for change. 33. Overall, the HR department in our company has strong skills to cope with various changes within the or- ganization. A P P E N D I X A HR Competency Measures (Items Adapted from Ulrich et al., 1995) 406 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, Fall 2006 Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm 1. Overall, I am satisfied with the service and support provided by the HR professionals in our company. 2. The HR professionals in our company are efficient (i.e. timely, cost-efficient) when recruiting candidates needed for business development. 3. The HR department is performing its job the way I would like it to be performed. 4. The HR department is very responsive to meeting line managers and employees needs. 5. The HR department provides me with useful and timely information regarding HR issues. 6. The HR department has helped to enhance the firms competitive position. 7. The HR department provides value-added contributions to the firms bottom line. 8. The HR department contributes to building the firms human capital as a source of competitive advantage. 9. The policies, practices, and procedures coming from the HR department help line managers and employ- ees perform their jobs well. 10. The HR policies, practices, and procedures help support the firms business plan. A P P E N D I X B Perceived HR Effectiveness Measures