Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Page
1 PETROLEUM RESERVOIR ROCKS ......................................... 1-1
1.1
1.2
1.3
2.2
2.3
2.8.2
2.8.3
2.8.4
2.8.5
DEFINITION ....................................................................................3-1
3.2
3.3
PERMEABILITY-POROSITY CORRELATIONS............................3-61
INTRODUCTION..............................................................................4-1
4.2
ESTIMATION .................................................................................4-75
4.5.1 Introduction ....................................................................4-75
4.5.2 Ordinary Kriging Equations ........................................... 4-86
Derivation in Terms of the
Covariance Function ................................................... 4-89
Derivation in Terms of the Variogram ....................... 4-94
Solution of the Kriging Equation in terms
of the Covariance Function......................................... 4-98
Solution of the Kriging Equation in terms
of Variogram ..............................................................4-103
INTRODUCTION.............................................................................. 5-1
5.2
5.3
INTRODUCTION..............................................................................6-1
6.2
WETTABILITY................................................................................6-31
6.3.1 Definition.........................................................................6-31
6.3.2 Determination of Wettability ......................................... 6-36
Contact Angle Method ................................................. 6-37
Amott Wettability Test.................................................. 6-40
United State Bureau of Mines (USBM)
Wettability Test............................................................. 6-42
6.3.3 Wettability of Petroleum Reservoirs.............................. 6-45
6.3.4 Effect of Wettability on Rock-Fluid Interactions........... 6-46
Microscopic Fluid Distribution at the
Pore Scale ..................................................................... 6-47
Effect of Wettability on Irreducible
Water Saturation .......................................................... 6-47
Effect of Wettability on Electrical
Properties of Rocks ...................................................... 6-48
Effect of Wettability on the Efficiency of an
Immiscible Displacement .............................................6-51
6.3
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
8.3
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 PETROPHYSICS
Petrophysics is the study of rock properties and their interactions
with fluids (gases, liquid hydrocarbons and aqueous solutions). Because
petroleum reservoir rocks must have porosity and permeability, we are
most interested in the properties of porous and permeable rocks. The
purpose of this text is to provide a basic understanding of the physical
properties of permeable geologic rocks and the interactions of the various
fluids with their interstitial surfaces. Particular emphasis is placed on
the transport properties of the rocks for single phase and multiphase
flow.
The petrophysical properties that are discussed in this text
include:
Porosity
Absolute permeability
Effective and relative permeabilities
Water saturation
1-1
In the presence of
to
consolidated
rock
such
as
compaction,
cementation,
Chemical Formula
Specific Gravity
SiO2
KAlSi2O8
NaAlSi3O8
CaAl2Si2O8
Al2Si2O5(OH)
2.65
2.57
2.62 - 2.76
2.5
CaCO3
CaMg(CO3)2
2.72
2.85
Fe3O4
Fe2O3
5.18
4.9 - 5.3
1-4
Sulfates
Anhydrite
Gypsum
Barite
CaSO4
CaSO4.2H2O
BaSO4
2.89 - 2.98
2.32
4.5
Sulfide
Pyrite
FeS2
5.02
Chloride
Halite
NaCl
2.16
1.4 ROCKS
A rock is an aggregate of one or more minerals. There are three
classes of rocks: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks .
1.4.1 Igneous Rocks
These are rocks formed from molten material (called magma) that
solidified upon cooling either:
1.
or
2.
1-5
Accumulation
and
consolidation
of
minerals,
rocks
and/or
reservoir rock and trap to hold the petroleum in the earths crust.
Sedimentary rocks are the least abundant rocks on the earths crust,
making up about 7.9% of the earths crust.
1-6
classified by grain size as boulder, cobble, gravel, sand, silt and clay.
Figure 1.1 shows such a classification known as the Wentworth scale.
Table 1.2 Clastic Sedimentary Rocks
1-7
rocks
are
formed
by
biologic
precipitation
and
by
1-8
1-9
Consequently, sandstone
reservoirs vary from clean, well sorted quartz sandstone with well
rounded
grains
(Figure
1.2a)
through
more
angular
feldspathic
1-10
Figure 1.2: Examples of sandstone reservoir rocks. (A) clean, well sorted
sandstone, (B) angular, feldspathic sandstone and (C) argillacious, very
poorly sorted sandstone.
1-11
1-12
sands confirm that the grain size essentially has no influence on porosity
for well sorted sand. However, porosities of wet packed sands show a
general decrease as sorting becomes poorer.
mixture of sizes, the smaller grains partially fill the interstices between
the larger grains.
Permeability, being a measure of the ease with which a material
transmits fluids, depends primarily upon the size, shapes and extent of
the interconnections between individual pores rather than the size of the
pores themselves.
related to the pore size which in turn is related to grain size, there are
relationships between these factors and permeability.
Krumbein and
Monk (1942) have shown that permeability varies as the square of the
mean grain diameter and a complex function of sorting (other factors
being equal). Experimental data show a marked decrease in permeability
as grain size decreases and as sorting becomes poorer. Experience has
also shown that the permeability measured normal to the bedding is
usually less than permeability measured parallel to the bedding and that
large variations in permeability occur in different directions in the
bedding plane.
Clay in the pore space of a reservoir may affect the performance of
a reservoir very adversely.
1-13
1-14
1-15
2.
1-16
This form of
In the Eocene
Wilcox sandstones of the Gulf Coast, the distribution of silica cement can
be related to both primary texture and depth of burial. The amount of
silica cement tends to increase in coarser and better sorted sands and, to
a lesser extent, with depth. Much of this cement appears to be early and
unrelated to the compaction process.
1.7.3 Classification
Sandstones may be classified by mineral composition (Figure 1.6).
The principal types are: (a) quartz sandstones consisting of over 95%
detrital quartz, (b) feldspathic sandstone consisting of 5 - 25% feldspar,
(c) arkosic sandstone consisting of over 25% feldspar, (d) sublithic
sandstone consisting of 5 - 25% rock fragments and (e) lithic sandstone
consisting of over 25% rock fragments.
1-17
1-18
1-19
porosity
dolomitization.
in
carbonate
reservoirs
is
usually
due
to
reservoirs
may
have
the
lowest
primary
porosity.
1-21
1-22
1-23
Correlation of
1-25
1-26
1-27
millimeters in aperture. Fractures that have not been filled with cement
have very high permeabilities, even though they may be fairly widelyspaced.
fraction of the reservoir pore space. Thus, the matrix contains the bulk
of the reservoir pore volume while the fractures contain the bulk of the
reservoir flow capacity.
Figure 1.11 shows a naturally fractured rock together with its
idealized dual porosity approximation.
1-28
1-29
i 6
Net pay
(1.1)
hi
i 1
h
h0
hi
i 1
h0
(1.2)
1-30
1-31
REFERENCES
Archie, G.E. :Introduction to Petrophysics of Reservoir Rocks, AAPG
Bull., Vol. 34, No. 5 (May 1950) 943-961.
Beard, D.C. and Weyl, P.K. : Influence of Texture on Porosity and
Permeability of Unconsolidated Sand, AAPG Bull. (Feb. 1973) 57,
349-369.
Choquette, P.W. and Pray, L.C. : Geologic Nomenclature and
Classification of Porosity in Sedimentary Carbonates, AAPG Bull.,
Vol. 54, No. 2 (1970) 207-250.
Krumbein, W.C. and Monk, G.D. : Permeability as a Function of the Size
Parameters of Unconsolidated Sand, Amer. Int. Mining and Met.
Tech. Pub. 1492, 1942.
Levorsen, A.I. : Geology of Petroleum, W.H. Freeman and Company, San
Francisco, 1967.
Neasham, J.W.: "The Morphology of Dispersed Clay in Sandstone
Reservoirs and Its Effect on Sandstone Shaliness, Pore Space and
Fluid Flow Properties," SPE 6858, Presented at the 52nd Annual
Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum
Engineers, Denver, Oct. 9-12, 1977.
Selley, R.C. : Elements of Petroleum Geology, W.H. Freeman, New York,
1985.
Stoneley, R. : An Introduction to Petroleum Exploration for Non-Geologists,
Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
Stow, D.A.V. : Sedimentary Rocks in the Field, Elsevier Academic Press,
Burlington, 2005.
1-32
CHAPTER 2
Vb Vs
Vb
(2.1)
Total
porosity accounts for all the pores in the rock (interconnected and
isolated
pores)
whereas
interconnected pores.
effective
porosity
only
accounts
for
the
2-1
porosity
is
affected
by
packing,
sorting
and
packing for spherical sand grains and their theoretical porosities. The
cubic packing has a porosity of 47.6%; the hexagonal packing has a
porostiy of 39.5% and the rhombohedral packing has a porosity of
25.9%.
22
2-3
sorting for all grain sizes and the approximately constant porosity of the
extremely well sorted sands for all grain sizes.
Table 2.1 Measured Porosities of Artificial Sandpacks (adapted from
Beard and Weyl, 1973)
dioxide
reacts
with
calcium
carbonate
to
form
calcium
2-5
CO2
H 2O
H 2CO3 CaCO3
(2.2)
H 2CO3
Ca HCO3
(2.3)
MgCl2
CaMg CO3
CaCl2
(2.4)
and may consist of (1) intergranular, (2) intercrystalline, (3) fractures and
fissures, and (4) vugular porosities.
26
measured with a caliper, from which the bulk volume can be calculated.
Two types of fluid displacements can be used to determine bulk
volume.
In the first method, fluid that does not easily penetrate the
V1 Vs V2 P2
(2.5)
Vs
V1 V2
P2
P1 P2
(2.6)
28
2-9
because after the test, the sample is no longer suitable for other
measurements. Mercury porosimetry is also used to determine capillary
pressure and pore size distribution of the sample (see Chapter 6).
The methods so far described determine the effective porosity of
the sample. To determine the total porosity, the sample is ground into a
fine powder after bulk volume measurement. The grain volume of the
ground sample can be determined either by liquid displacement or by
assuming an average grain density.
The measurement of porosity on consolidated samples in routine
core analysis might generally be expected to yield values of the true
fractional porosity plus or minus 0.005, i.e., a true value of 27% porosity
may be measured between 26.5% and 27.5% porosity.
Core porosities may differ from in-situ porosities for the following
reasons:
The core may be altered during recovery.
210
Example 2.1
An experiment has been performed to determine the porosity of an
irregularly shaped core sample. The cleaned dry sample was weighed in
air. It was then evacuated and fully saturated with an oil with a density
of 0.85 gm/cc and then weighed again in air. Afterwards, the saturated
sample was weighed when it was fully immersed in the oil. Here are the
results of the experiment.
Weight of dry sample in air
42.40 gm
45.49 gm
28.80 gm
2-11
a.
42.40 gm
45.49 gm
28.80 gm
0.85 gm/cc
b.
Grain
volume
(Vs)
28.80)/0.85 = 16.00 cc
212
(WdryWi)/ L
(42.40
air
dry
brine
wet
(2.7)
(2.8)
wet
dry
brine
air
(2.9)
d = 4.8 cm. (a) Cross-sectional slice. (b) Longitudinal vertical slice. (Peters
and Afzal, 1992).
2-15
216
of
each
type
of
fluid
occupying
the
pore
space.
The
2-17
the pore space is the fluid saturation. It is defined as the fraction of the
pore space occupied by a fluid phase. Thus, in general,
Fluid Saturation =
Fluid Volume
Effective Rock Pore Volume
(2.10)
For a gas
Fluid
The indirect
approach is to measure some other physical property of the rock that can
be related to fluid saturation.
218
2-19
At these
indirectly from the weight of the saturated sample before distillation, the
weight of the dry sample after distillation and the weight of the water
expelled from the sample.
indirectly from the requirement that the saturations must sum to one.
To ensure that all the oil has been removed from the sample, the
sample may be transferred from the Dean-Stark apparatus to a Soxhlet
extractor for further extraction (Figure 2.13).
2-21
occur
in
the
fluid
saturations
which
can
make
them
considerably different from the original in-situ saturations. The free gas,
if present, will expand, expelling water and oil in the process. Solution
gas will evolve from the oil, expand and further reduce the oil and water
volumes. The evolution of solution gas causes the oil to "shrink". These
changes cause the saturations determined by core analysis to be
different from the in-situ saturations. In particular, the changes cause
gas saturation to be excessive even when there was no free gas
saturation at the original in-situ conditions.
222
2-23
k
(md
)
0
4806.5
4807.5
2.5
4808.5
59
4809.5
221
4810.5
211
4811.5
275
4812.5
384
4813.5
108
4814.5
147
4815.5
290
4816.5
170
4817.5
278
4818.5
238
4819.5
167
4820.5
304
4821.5
98
4822.5
191
4823.5
266
4824.5
40
4825.5
260
4826.5
179
4827.5
312
(%)
So
(%)
Sw
(%)
Sg
(%)
7.5
0.0
12.
3
17.
0
20.
7
19.
1
20.
4
23.
3
24.
0
23.
3
16.
1
17.
2
15.
3
15.
9
18.
6
16.
2
20.
0
16.
9
18.
1
20.
3
15.
3
15.
1
14.
0
15.
6
0.0
68.
0
78.
0
43.
0
29.
0
31.
4
38.
7
34.
7
26.
2
30.
9
29.
2
34.
3
24.
2
26.
4
39.
8
39.
5
38.
0
34.
3
34.
8
31.
1
22.
9
13.
9
21.
4
28.
8
32.
0
22.
0
57.
0
71.
0
68.
6
61.
3
65.
3
73.
8
69.
1
70.
8
65.
7
75.
8
73.
6
60.
2
60.
5
62.
0
65.
7
65.
2
68.
9
77.
1
86.
1
78.
6
71.
2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
224
4828.5
272
15.
5
19.
4
17.
5
16.
4
17.
2
15.
5
20.
2
18.
3
19.
6
17.
7
20.
0
16.
8
13.
3
18.
0
16.
1
15.
1
18.
0
15.
7
0.0
4829.5
395
4830.5
405
4831.5
275
4832.5
852
4833.5
610
4834.5
406
4835.5
535
4836.5
663
4837.5
597
4838.5
434
4839.5
339
4840.5
216
4841.5
332
4842.5
295
4843.5
882
4844.5
600
4845.5
407
4847.5
479
17.
8
9.2
20.
8
14.
1
0.0
4848.5
4849.5
139
4850.5
135
20.
5
8.4
4851.5
1.1
6.2
13.
1
17.
7
19.
8
21.
9
16.
3
19.
7
19.
4
17.
5
14.
0
20.
8
18.
1
15.
6
19.
3
19.
2
20.
6
15.
3
0.0
0.0
2-25
34.
8
25.
3
25.
7
22.
5
19.
2
21.
3
22.
3
24.
6
16.
3
19.
8
27.
5
19.
7
23.
3
15.
6
15.
5
21.
2
22.
2
13.
4
65.
2
68.
5
61.
2
59.
8
61.
0
56.
8
61.
4
55.
7
64.
3
62.
7
58.
5
59.
5
58.
6
68.
8
65.
2
59.
6
57.
2
71.
3
14.
6
8.7
64.
6
77.
2
22.
9
42.
8
36.
4
77.
1
57.
2
63.
6
the measured properties vary with depth, which is an indication that the
reservoir is heterogeneous in nature. The porosity and permeability
distributions are shown in Figure 2.15. Variability of reservoir properties
is pervasive. Not only do the properties vary along the well depth, they
also vary laterally away from the well. The characterization of this
variability and the estimation of the properties at unmeasured locations
are the subjects addressed by geostatistics (see Chapter 4).
228
2-29
The mudcake seals off the formation from further invasion by the
mud filtrate. The presence of the mudcake can be detected by the logging
tool and will cause the borehole diameter to be smaller than the bit
diameter. It is an indication of invasion and, indirectly, of permeability.
Since the mudcake is a solid, it will not normally invade the formation.
Drilling mud itself usually cannot invade the formation because it
contains a lot of suspended solids. However, whole mud can be lost into
the formation if the formation is inadvertently fractured. This is lost
circulation, which should not be confused with mud filtrate invasion. The
mudcake has a very low permeability and as a result, controls the
volume of filtrate invasion. The depth of invasion is determined by the
porosity of the formation. The depth of invasion will be greater in a low
porosity formation than in a high porosity formation everything else
being equal.
Figure 2.16 shows a schematic diagram of the undisturbed
formation and the altered formation after it has been penetrated by the
bit. The left figure shows the undisturbed formation before it was drilled.
Let us assume that this is a sandstone formation bounded above and
below by impermeable shales. The bottom of the sand has water
saturation, Sw, of 100% and the upper section of the sand is at an
irreducible water saturation, Swirr. Irreducible water saturation is that
saturation at which the water cannot be produced during normal
production operations. The water occupies the lower portion of the
formation because it is denser than oil which floats to the top of the
formation. There is a transition zone in which the water saturation
decreases from 100% at the bottom to 25% at the top over a finite length
of the formation. This transition zone is caused by capillarity (see
230
Chapter 7). It should be pointed out that not all hydrocarbon bearing
zones contain irreducible water. Some can contain mobile water.
On the right is the same formation after it has been drilled. Here,
invasion has occurred. Because of the higher pressure in the borehole
than the formation, the formation acts as a mud press and separates the
mud into mudcake which plasters the borehole wall, and mud filtrate,
which invades the formation. In order to invade the formation, the fluids
that were originally there must be displaced. The filtrate flushes or
2-31
displaces the fluids deeper into the formation and takes their place near
the wellbore.
In the bottom of the formation where Sw = 100%, the flushing is
nearly complete because the formation water is being displaced by water
which is different only in salinity and is miscible with it. The salinity of
any formation water left behind will soon reach equilibrium with the
filtrate because of diffusion.
In the upper part of the formation, we had an initially large oil
saturation (Soi = 1-Swirr). Although most of the formation water has been
displaced by mud filtrate, residual oil remains in the flushed zone with a
saturation, Sor, because an immiscible displacement can never be
complete.
The filtrate has flushed out all the original fluids that it can flush
out to a certain depth. This depth is called the flushed zone. The flushed
zone water saturation is designated Sxo and the flushed zone diameter is
designated dxo. The resistivity of the water in the flushed zone is Rmf, the
resitivity of the mud filtrate, and the resistivity of the flushed zone
formation is Rxo. If we go a little deeper into the formation, we will find a
transition zone, which contains a mixture of formation fluids and mud
filtrate. The zone, from the borehole wall to the end of the mud filtrate is
the invaded zone and includes the flushed zone. The diameter of the
invaded zone is designated as di, the water saturation is Si, and the
formation resisitivity Ri. Note that in the flushed zone, Si = Sxo and Ri =
Rxo. Since the water between dxo and di is a mixture of formation water
and filtrate, it is not possible to measure a single value for Ri in this zone.
Finally, as we pass the invaded zone, we return to the undisturbed or
uncontaminated formation. This is the virgin zone. The conditions in this
232
zone are the same as at the left side of Figure 2.16. The resistivity of this
undisturbed zone is Rt, the true formation resisitivity, which we ideally
would like to measure for estimating the undisturbed water saturation,
Sw.
Figure
2.17
gives
the
same
information
about
the
fluid
2-33
234
2-35
236
where
2Z
A
(2.11)
atomic number of the element and A is the atomic weight of the element.
For a molecule, the electron density index is given by
2
e
Zi
M
(2.12)
2-37
1.0704
0.1883
(2.13)
(2.14)
(2.15)
To calculate porosity from Eq.(2.15), the matrix and fluid densities must
be known or assumed. The depth of investigation of the density log is
relatively shallow. Therefore, in most permeable formations, the pore
fluid is the drilling mud filtrate, along with any residual hydrocarbons.
Usually, the fluid density is assumed to be 1.0 gm/cc. When residual
hydrocarbon saturations are fairly high, this can cause the calculated
porosity values to be greater than the true porosity, and should be
corrected for this effect. Table 2.4 gives the densities of various rock
matrices.
Figure 2.20 shows a typical presentation of a density log. Track 1
shows the Gamma Ray log, which measures the natural gamma
radiation of the formation. Radioactive elements such as uranium,
potassium and thorium tend to occur more in shales than in sands. As a
result, the Gamma Ray log is a lithology log that identifies shales from
sands. The caliper in the same track measures the borehole diameter.
238
The formation density and the porosity derived from it are presented in
Tracks 2 and 3. Also shown is the correction or compensation applied to
account for mud cake effect and small borehole irregularities.
2
Elemen
1.008
Z
A
t
H
1.984
1
12.01
1
O
16.00
1
8
0
Na
22.99
0.999
1.000
0
11
0.956
9
Mg
24.32
12
0.986
8
Al
26.98
13
0.963
7
Si
28.09
14
0.996
8
32.07
16
0.997
8
Cl
35.46
17
0.958
8
39.10
19
0.971
9
Ca
40.08
20
0.998
0
2-39
Zi
Compound
Formula
(gm/cc)
(gm/cc)
(gm/cc)
Quartz
SiO2
2.654
0.9985
2.650
2.648
Calcite
CaCO3
2.710
0.9991
2.708
2.710
Dolomite
CaMg(CO3)2
2.870
0.9977
2.863
2.876
Anhydrite
CaSO4
2.960
0.9990
2.957
2.977
Sylvite
KCl
1.984
0.9657
1.916
1.863
Halite
NaCl
2.165
0.9581
2.074
2.032
Gypsum
CaSO4.H2O
2.320
1.0222
2.372
2.351
Fresh Water
H2O
1.000
1.1101
1.110
1.00
Salt Water
200,000
1.146
1.0797
1.237
1.135
0.850
1.1407
0.970
0.850
ppm
Oil
N(CH2)
Methane
CH4
meth
1.247
1.247
met
C1.1H4.2
gas
1.238
240
1.238
meth-
0.188
Gas
1.335
gas
1.325
gas
-0.188
2-41
sound wave. To avoid fractions, the interval transit time is scaled by 106
and reported in micro-seconds per ft ( sec/ft). Thus,
106
v
(2.16)
242
where
tf
tm
tf is the
2-43
(2.17)
tm
tm
(2.18)
To calculate porosity from Eq.(2.18), the transit times for the rock matrix
and the pore fluid must be known or assumed. Table 2.5 gives the sonic
speeds and interval transit times for common rock matrices. The depth of
investigation of the sonic log is relatively shallow. Thus, the pore fluid is
usually assumed to be mud filtrate with an interval transit time of 189
sec/ft, corresponding to a fluid velocity of 5300 ft/sec.
If any shale laminae exist in the sandstone, the apparent sonic
porosity is increased by an amount proportional to the bulk volume
fraction of such laminae. The interval transit time is increased because
transit time for shale generally exceeds that of the matrix.
In carbonates having intergranular porosity, Wyllies average
formula still applies. But sometimes, the pore structure and pore size
distribution are significantly different from sandstones. Also, there is
often some secondary porosity such as vugs and fractures with much
larger dimensions than the pores of the primary porosity. In vuggy
formations, according to Wyllie, the velocity of sound depends mostly on
the primary porosity, and the porosity derived from the sonic reading
through the time average formula will tend to be too low by an amount
approaching the secondary porosity.
Direct application of the Wyllie formula to unconsolidated and
insufficiently compacted sands gives porosity values that are too high.
When shale transit time exceeds 100
244
t
tf
tm
tm
100
tsh
(2.19)
where tsh is the interval transit time in the adjacent shale. Figure 2.22
shows a typical presentation of the sonic log.
Table 2.5: Sonic Speed and Interval Transit Time for Rock Formations
tm ( sec/ft)
tm ( sec/ft)
vm (ft/sec)
(commonly used)
Sandstones
18,000 19,000
55.5 51.0
55.5 or 51.0
Limestones
21,000 23,000
47.6 43.5
47.5
Dolomites
23,000
43.5
43.5
Anhydrite
20,000
50.0
50.0
Salt
15,000
66.7
67.0
Casing (iron)
17,500
57.0
57.0
2-45
amount of energy lost per collision depends on the relative mass of the
nucleus with which the neutron collides. The greatest energy loss occurs
when the neutron collides with a nucleus of practically equal mass, i.e.,
2-47
hydrogen. Collisions with heavy nuclei do not slow the neutrons down
very much. Thus, the slowing down of neutrons depends largely on the
amount of hydrogen in the formation.
Within a few microseconds, the neutrons have been slowed down
by successive collisions to thermal velocities, corresponding to energies
of around 0.025 electron volt (eV). They then diffuse randomly, without
losing any more energy, until they are captured by the nuclei of atoms
such as chlorine, hydrogen, silicon and others. The capturing nucleus
becomes intensely excited and emits a high-energy gamma ray of
capture. Depending on the type of Neutron logging tool, either these
capture gamma rays or the slow neutrons themselves are counted by a
detector in the tool.
When the hydrogen concentration of the material surrounding the
neutron source is large, most of the neutrons are slowed down and
captured within a short distance from the source. However, if the
hydrogen concentration is small, the neutrons travel farther from the
source before they are captured. Accordingly, the counting rate at the
detector increases for decreased hydrogen concentration and decreases
for increased hydrogen concentration. The porosity based on the neutron
count is given by
(2.20)
a b log
is the porosity.
neutron counting rate indicates low porosity and a low neutron counting
rate indicates high porosity. Figure 2.24 shows a typical presentation of
the Neutron log. The neutron count is presented in API (American
Petroleum Institute) units. The porosity is in neutron porosity units
based on calibration with limestone or sandstone.
Two additional factors should be considered in the interpretation of
neutron logs. First, shales and zones containing a significant amount of
shale, will indicate a high neutron porosity due to the bound water
associated with the shale. Secondly, because of the lower concentration
of hydrogen in gas than in oil or water, a zone containing gas will
indicate a neutron porosity that is lower than it should be. These
features are really an advantage since a comparison of the neutron
porosity to cores and other porosity logs provides a convenient method
for determining shale volumes and for distinguishing gas zones from oil
or water zones. In a gas zone, the fluid density is very much lower than
the 1.0 gm/cc used in Eq.(2.15) to calculate the density porosity. As a
result, the density porosity in a gas zone is higher than it should be.
Thus, in a gas zone, the neutron porosity is too low and the density
porosity is too high. When the two porosity logs are superimposed, the
two curves will agree is shales and in liquid zones and will cross over in
gas zones. This cross over of the two logs can be used to identify gas
bearing zones as shown in Figure 2.25.
2-49
250
Resistivity
1
Conductivity
252
(2.21)
2-53
254
Ro
FRw or F
Ro
Rw
(2.22)
2-55
(2.23)
ln F
ln a m ln
(2.24)
1000
-1.7332
y = 1.1016x
2
R = 0.8648
100
10
1
0.01
0.1
Porosity
256
(2.25)
0.62
Ro
Rw
2.15
(2.26)
Eq. (2.26) is known as the Humble formula and is still widely used in the
petroleum industry.
Archie also conducted resistivity measurements in partially
saturated cores to measure Rt at various water saturations, Sw. He
defined formation resistivity index as
Rt
Ro
(2.27)
He found that the formation resistivity index, I, was related to the water
saturation by an equation of the form
Rt
Ro
2-57
1
S wn
(2.28)
where n is the water saturation exponent. Eq.(2.28) can be solved for the
water saturation as
Sw
1
I
Ro
Rt
FRw
Rt
(2.29)
Figure 2.29 shows lnI versus lnSw for a Berea sandstone core. For this
sample, n = 2.27. Archie found n to be approximately 2 for the core
samples in his study. The hydrocarbon saturation is given by
Sh 1 Sw
(2.30)
258
2-59
260
Electric Log
The Electric log was the basic and most frequently used log until
the mid 1950's. This log was invented and developed by two French
brothers, Conrad and Marcel Schlumberger. Figure 2.31 shows the
presentation of an electric log. It consists of a Spontaneous Potential (SP)
curve in Track 1 and a combination of resistivity curves designated as
normal and lateral depending on the electrode arrangements.
The normal curve is produced by two effective electrodes downhole,
a current electrode and a pickup electrode as shown in Figure 2.32.
Resistivity values are measured by recording the voltage drop across
these electrodes. A short normal, with electrode spacing of 18 inches, is
used for correlation to define bed boundaries, and to measure the
2-61
Figure 2.32. Schematic of electric logging tool: (A) Normal curve, (B)
Lateral curve.
2-63
Induction-Electric Log
The Induction-Electric log is a combination of electric log curves
with induction curves. The induction tool was developed to provide a
means of logging wells drilled with oil-based (nonconductive) muds. All
the original electric logging tools used the mud column to conduct the
current into the formation, so they could not be run in nonconductive
muds or air-drilled holes. Although the induction tool was developed to
meet the need for a resistivity tool that could operate in a nonconductive
mud, it soon became recognized that the tool worked better than the
original electric log in freshwater muds. The induction curve was easier
to read than the electric log, and it read close to true formation resistivity
in formations where the resistivity was not over 200 ohm-meter and Rmf
was greater than Rw.
The induction tool works by the principle of electromagnetic
induction.
high-frequency
alternating
current
flows
through
transmitter coil mounted on the logging tool (Figure 2.33). This current
sets up a high-frequency magnetic field around the tool, which extends
into the formation. The alternating magnetic field causes currents to flow
through the formation concentric with the axis of the induction tool. The
currents, called ground loops, are proportional to the conductivity of the
formation. They alternate at the same frequency as the magnetic field
and the transmitter current flowing through the induction coil. The
ground loop currents set up a magnetic field of their own. This secondary
magnetic field causes a current to flow in the receiver coil located in the
logging tool. The amount of current flowing in the receiver coil is
proportional
to
the
ground
loop
currents
and
therefore
to
the
264
2-65
266
2-67
268
2-69
270
Various laterolog tools have been developed over the years. Among
the most commonly used tools, the dual laterolog is common. This tool,
similar to the dual induction tool, has both deep and shallow measuring
laterologs. It is often run in conjunction with a very shallow reading
laterolog tool, which is mounted on a pad pressed against the borehole.
272
Porosity.
274
276
equal, the SP deflections will be small and the curve will be rather
featureless and useless.
The deflections on the SP curve result from electric currents
flowing in the mud in the borehole. These currents are caused by
electromotive forces in the formation, which are of electrochemical and
electrokinetic origins. Consider a permeable formation with thick shales
above and below it. Assume that the two electrolytes present, formation
water and mud filtrate, contain sodium chloride (NaCl) only. Because of
the layered clay structure and the charges on the layers, shales are
permeable to the Na+ cations but impermeable to the Cl- anions. Only the
Na+ cations are able to move through the shale from the more saline to
the less saline NaCl solution. This movement of charged ions constitutes
an electric current, and the force causing them to move constitutes a
potential across the shale.
The curve arrow in the upper section of Figure 2.40 shows the
direction of the current corresponding to the flow of Na+ ions through the
adjacent shale from the more saline formation water to the less saline
drilling mud in the borehole. Since shales pass only the cations, shales
resemble ion-selective membranes, and the potential across the shale is
called the membrane potential.
A second component of the electrochemical potential is produced
at the edge of the invaded zone where the mud filtrate and formation
water (the electrolytes) are in direct contact. Here Na+ and Cl- can diffuse
from one electrolyte to the other. Since Cl- are more mobile than Na+
ions, the net result of the diffusion is the flow of negative Cl- ions from
the more saline to the less saline electrolyte. This is equivalent to a
conventional current flow in the opposite direction as shown by the
2-77
arrow A in the upper half of Figure 2.40. The current flowing across the
junction between solutions of different salinity is produced by an
electromotive force called liquid-junction potential. The magnitude of the
liquid-junction potential is much smaller than the membrane potential.
If the permeable formation is clean (not shaly), the total
electrochemical emf, Ec, corresponding to these two phenomena is given
by
Ec
K log
aw
amf
(2.31)
where aw and awf are the chemical activities of the two solutions at
formation temperature, K is a coefficient proportional to temperature,
and for NaCl formation water and mud filtrate is 71 at 25 C (77 F). The
chemical activity of a solution is roughly proportional to salinity and
hence to its conductivity. If the solutions contain substantial amounts of
salts other than NaCl, the value of K at 77 F may differ from 71. If the
permeable formation is shaly, or contains dispersed clay, the total
electrochemical emf will be reduced since the clay produces an
electrochemical membrane of opposite polarity to that of the adjacent
shale bed.
278
2-79
2-81
is
proportional
to
the
weight
concentrations
of
the
V Ai
i i
GR
2-83
(2.32)
where
volume
of
the
minerals,
Ai
are
proportionality
factors
is the bulk
284
Scintillation counters are now generally used for this measurement. They
are much more efficient than the Geiger-Mueller counters used in the
past. Events resulting in gamma rays are random. For this reason,
gamma ray logs have a ragged appearance (see Figure 2.20).
The primary calibration for the gamma ray tools is in the API
(American Petroleum Institute) test facility in Houston. A field calibration
standard is used to normalize each tool to the API standard and the logs
are calibrated in API units. The radioactivities in sedimentary formations
generally range from a few API units in anhydrite or salt to 200 or more
units in shales.
The GR log is particularly useful for defining shale beds when the
SP is distorted (in very resistive formations), when the SP is featureless
(in fresh water-bearing formations or in salty muds, when Rmf = Rw), or
when the SP cannot be recorded (in nonconductive mud, empty or airdrilled hole, cased holes). The bed boundary is picked at the point
midway between the maximum and minimum deflection of the anomaly.
The gamma ray reflects the proportion of shale and, in many
regions, can be used to quantitatively as a shale indicator. It is also used
for the detection and evaluation of radioactive minerals, such as potash
and uranium ore. The GR log is part of most logging programs in both
open hole and cased hole. It is readily combined with most other logging
tools and permits the accurate correlation of logs made on one trip into
the borehole with those that were made on another trip.
2.7.6 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Logs
NMR measurements of fluids in porous media can be used under
favorable conditions to estimate porosity, irreducible water saturation,
2-85
1
2
Bo
parallel
antiparrallel
Bo
parallel
antiparallel
where
B0
(2.33)
1
relative sensitivity and a high natural abundance. So H nuclei (protons)
possess a strong magnetic moment and are most commonly used in NMR
logging and NMR imaging.
Table 2.7: Magnetic Resonance Properties of Some Important Nuclei
Nucleus
1
H
C
19
F
23
Na
31
P
13
Natural
Abundance %
Hz / Gauss
Relative
Sensitivity
99.98
4257
1.0
1.10
1071
0.016
100.0
4005
0.830
100.0
1126
0.093
100.0
1723
0.066
Bo
B1
290
M transverse
0
M transverse
exp
t / T2*
(2.34)
0
where M transverse
is the initial transverse magnetization immediately after a
B0
B0 effects are
, the
effects are canceled at the center of the echo, where the dephasing from
B0 is momentarily rephased.
If the induced signal is measured at time TE after a 90 RF pulse,
then equation (2.34) can be rewritten as
M transverse
0
M transverse
exp
TE / T2
(2.35)
292
Mz t
M 0 1 exp
t / T1
(2.36)
90 RF
2-93
The
longitudinal
direction
or
direction
of
B0,
is
M z TR
M 0 1 exp
(2.37)
TR / T1
M 0 1 exp
(2.38)
TR / T1
M transverse
M 0 1 exp
TR / T1
exp
TE / T2
(2.39)
294
Random thermal motion will affect the NMR signal as spins move
from one part of the sample to another and experience a different
magnetic field strength because of static field inhomogeneities. Variation
in the frequency and phase of these mobile spins introduces a phase
incoherence that causes a reduction in the signal amplitude. This effect
can be expressed by Eq.(2.40) (Hahn, 1950):
M transverse
TE
exp
TR
0
exp
M transverse
2 D 2G 2 TE
3
2
(2.40)
gradient.
NMR Signal and Corresponding T2 Spectrum
The exponential decay curve shown in Figure 2.47 suggests that all
the spins relax at the same T2 relaxation time. This would be applicable
to the spins in a bulk fluid such as the protons in water in a test tube.
However, when the fluids are confined in the pore space of a porous
medium, the protons near the pore wall will relax faster (shorter T2) than
those in the center of the pores. Further, the protons in small pores will
relax faster than those in large pores. As a result, the NMR decay signal
will contain a spectrum of T2 relaxation times. The signal can be
decomposed into its T2 spectrum by using a multi-exponential model as
M t
M0
j m
f j exp
j 1
2-95
t / T2 j
(2.41)
gi
M ti
M0
j m
f j exp
ti / T2 j
(2.42)
for i 1, 2,..., n
j 1
is the error
caused by noise in the data and n is the total number of echos. A least
square fit is used to determine the fjs that minimize the sum
where
is
i 1
j 1
f j exp
regularization
ti / T2 j
gi
f j2
(2.43)
j 1
constant
or
smoothing
parameter.
296
Time (ms)
Figure 2.48. Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill spin echo measurements.
T2 (ms)
Figure 2.49. T2 spectrum of the data of Figure 2.49.
2-97
298
bulk volume for T2 greater than 30 milliseconds. The Free Fluid Index is
also known as Bulk Volume Movable (BVM). The Bulk Volume
Irreducible (BVI) is the percent of the bulk volume containing irreducible
water. The irreducible water consists of two components: (1) Clay Bound
Water (CBW) (T2 from 0.3 to 3 milliseconds), which is the water bound to
the clay minerals and (2) Bulk Volume Capillary (BVC) (T2 from 3 to 30
milliseconds), which is the water trapped by capillary forces. The Bulk
Volume Water (BVW) (T2 from 0.3 to 300 milliseconds) is the percent of
the bulk volume occupied by water (moveable, capillary bound water and
clay bound water). These bulk volumes are related to porosity and
saturations as follows:
Vp
total
Vi
Vp
(2.45)
(2.46)
VCBW VBCV
Vb
(2.47)
Si
Vp
total
(2.44)
Vb
BVI
VCBW VBCV
Vb
(2.48)
VBVM
Vb
(2.49)
BVM
total
VBVM
Vb
BVI
2-99
BVM
(2.50)
BVM
BVI
total
Vw
Vb
BVW
(2.51)
MPHI
total
MPHI
S wV p
BVI
Sw
Vb
total
FFI
(2.52)
(2.53)
VBVC VBVM
Vp
(2.54)
VBVC VBVM
totalVb
(2.55)
BVC BMV
(2.56)
e
total
S wirr
VCBW VBVC
Vp
BVI
FFI
BVI
(2.57)
total
S wirr
(2.58)
1 S wirr
(2.59)
total
total
Vb
Vb
Figure 2.51 shows an NMR log in which the pore fluids in the
second track have been divided into free fluid (above 30 ms), capillary
bound fluid (3 to 30 ms), small pore bound fluid (0.28 to 3 ms), and very
small pore bound fluid (0.2 to 0.28 ms). The two small pore bound fluids
(0.2 to 3 ms) correspond to clay bound fluid. Also shown in the third
track is the T2 spectrum, with a T2 cutoff of 30 ms for free fluid. Note the
two streaks with free fluid at depths of X163 m and X189 m, where the
2100
phases
within
the
pore:
bulk
phase
with
relaxation
characteristic of the bulk fluid and a surface phase with much faster
relaxation. Assuming that diffusion of the fluid is much faster than the
relaxation process, the observed relaxation rate is given by a single
average T1 value as
1
T1
1
T1bulk
S
V T1surface
(2.60)
is the thickness
2-101
Figure 2.51. Example NMR log showing fluid distribution in the pore
space.
2102
1
T1
where
S
V
(2.61)
T1 responds to pore size. Small pores (large S/V ratio) exhibit small
values for T1, and the converse is true for large pores.
1
T2
1
T2bulk
S
V T2 surface
1
3
(2.62)
B D
where the first two terms on the right side correspond to similar
expressions in Eq.(2.60), while the last term accounts for spin dephasing
because of restricted diffusion in a magnetic field gradient
pulse spacing (pulse-to-echo delay),
B.
is the
protons, and D is the diffusion coefficient. Usually, the first and the last
2-103
terms on the right side of Eq.(2.62)are small and can be neglected. Thus,
1
T2
where
S
V
(2.63)
suggests
that
this
corresponds
to
coarsening-upward
2104
Figure 2.52. Example NMR log showing pore size distribution in a waterbearing sandstone section.
2-105
and
interparticle
pores.
The
relationship
between
C x S wirry
k
where C is an empirical constant,
(2.64)
k 10
4.5
2
S wirr
2106
(2.65)
where the porosity and irreducible water saturation are in fractions and
the permeability is in millidarcy. One version of the Timur/Coates
equation that is widely used to estimate permeability from NMR logs is
given by
4
NMR
FFI
BVI
(2.66)
a 4T22gm
(2.67)
f j log T2 j
T2 gm
j 1
(2.68)
fj
j 1
C1
4
2
NMR 1
and
2-107
(2.69)
C2
4
2
NMR 2
(2.70)
2108
(2-dimensional
Fourier
Transform)
spin-echo
NMR
imaging
where
B0
(2.71)
rGr
and we
2-109
The magnitude of the gradient, its direction (i.e., along what axis), and
timing need to be controlled.
90
180o
a. RF
b. G ss
c. G RO
d. G PE
Echo
e. NMR
TE
Timing
TR
p1
tpe
pw
tro
2110
Slice-Selective Excitation
In most NMR imaging applications, it is desirable to generate a
single slice or multislice images. The initial step in generating such an
image is the localization of the RF excitation to a region of space. This is
accomplished by the use of frequency-selective excitation in conjunction
with a slice-selection gradient, Gss, on an axis perpendicular to the
chosen slice plane. A frequency-selective RF pulse has two parts
associated with it, a central frequency and a bandwidth of frequencies
ss
ss
ss
(2.72)
Gss d s1
ss
is
Frequency Encoding
The next task in the imaging process is encoding the image
information within the excited slice. The image information is actually
the amplitude of the NMR signal arising from the various locations in the
slice. Two distinct processes are used for encoding the two dimensions:
frequency encoding and phase encoding.
The frequency encoding provides one of the two visual dimensions
of the image. The NMR signal is always detected in the presence of a
frequency encoding gradient in an imaging pulse sequence. After sliceselective excitation, the frequency encoding gradient, also known as the
readout gradient, GRO, is applied perpendicularly to the slice direction.
Under the influence of this new gradient field, the nuclei within the slice
will precess at different frequencies depending on their positions in the
readout gradients direction, in accordance with Eq.(2.71). Each of these
frequencies will be superimposed in the echo. The echo signal is detected
in the presence of GRO and digitized at a chosen sampling interval for
later Fourier transformation. The magnitude of GRO and the frequencies
that are detected enable the positions of the nuclei to be determined.
Two user-selectable parameters determine the image resolution in
the frequency encoding, or the readout, direction: the field of view (FOV)
in the readout direction and the number of readout data points in the
matrix, NRO. The pixel size in the readout direction is given by
FOV
RO
N RO
and
2112
RO
(2.73)
FOV
RO
N RO
2 GRO tro
BW
GRO
(2.74)
FOV
PE
N PE
2-113
PE
(2.75)
and
FOV
where
PE
N PE
GPE t pe
(2.76)
encoding gradient.
Image Reconstruction
Two types of matrices are used in NMR imaging:
image data. The raw data matrix is a grid of complex points with the
frequency encoding direction displayed in the horizontal direction and
the phase encoding direction displayed in the vertical direction. All image
information is contained within the raw data matrix.
The image data matrix is obtained by a two-dimensional Fourier
transformation of the raw data matrix. The first Fourier transformation of
each row of the raw data matrix yields a set of modulated projections of
the slice onto the frequency encoding axis. The second Fourier
transformation of each column of the temporary data matrix converts the
signal magnitude at each readout frequency from a function of GPE to a
function of frequency, resulting in the image. The image matrix is a
spatial
map
of
the
nuclei
signal
intensity.
While
the
Fourier
2114
2-115
2116
Voxel size is a very important factor in increasing the signal-tonoise ratio (SNR). Voxel size is defined by
d s1
FOV
RO
N RO
FOV
N PE
PE
(2.77)
If the voxel volume is large, then there are more spins in each voxel to
contribute to the signal, thus increasing the SNR. But large voxels imply
a low spatial resolution. The converse is also true. Small voxels imply a
low SNR but a high spatial resolution. Therefore, the user-controlled
parameters, slice thickness ds1, FOV, NRO and NPE, are important
parameters that affect the signal-to-noise ratio and the image resolution.
The echo time TE, repetition time TR, longitudinal relaxation time T1
and transverse relaxation time T2 are the important factors that
determine image contrast as defined in Eq.(2.39). Remembering that T2
relaxation describes the rate of decay of the NMR signal in the transverse
plane, a long TE would yield different signal intensity from objects
possessing different T2 values. The long T2 object will contribute more
signal, causing it to appear hyperintense in the NMR image relative to
the short T2 object. This is termed a T2-weighted image. Similarly, since
T1 relaxation describes the rate of recovery of the longitudinal
magnetization, a short TR would yield different signal intensity from
objects possessing different T1 values. The object exhibiting a short T1
value will contribute more signal, causing it to appear hyperintense in
the NMR image relative to the long T1 object. This is termed a T1weighted image.
2-117
In summary, TE controls T2-weighting and TR controls T1weighting of an image. Short T2 objects are dark on T2-weighted images,
but short T1 objects are bright on T1-weighted images.
Example NMR Images of Laboratory Cores
Figures 2.56 and 2.57 show NMR-derived porosity images of a
brine saturated sandstone core. Figure 2.56 shows the images at six
cross sections along the core whereas Figure 2.57 shows the images of
four, longitudinal vertical slices. The layered nature of the core is clearly
apparent from these images. Although the images are not calibrated with
numerical porosity values, nevertheless, the first three slices in Figure
2.56 indicate that the core appears to be less porous at the top than
elsewhere. The core is 10 cm long, 5 cm in diameter, and has a
permeability of 97 md and an average porosity of 15.9 %.
Figure
2.58
shows
NMR-derived
images
of
the
solvent
2118
2-119
invaded by the D2O. The reduced NMR signals can be used to image the
progress of the displacement as shown in Figure 2.58. Because the
mobility ratio is favorable, the displacement pattern is controlled entirely
by the permeability variations in the core. Note the chanelling of the
injected solvent due to permeability variation in the core. Clearly, the top
of the core is less permeable than the rest of the core. This correlates well
with the low porosity of the top of the core shown in Figure 2.56. Figure
2.59 shows one-dimensional solvent concentration profiles for the same
displacement. The information is quantitative and can be used to
calibrate a numerical model of the displacement.
2120
2-121
2122
2-123
tool does not. If isolated pores are present, the effective porosity
measured in core analysis will be less than the effective permeability
measured by NMR. Thus, Figure 2.62 could be helpful in reconciling
differences in the porosity measurements from the various methods.
Nr
7758 Ah 1 S w
Bo
Rf
(2.78)
where
Nr
porosity (fraction)
Sw
Rf
=
oil formation volume factor (reservoir barrels/stock tank
Bo
barrel, RB/STB)
7758 =
Minimum (x1)
Maximum (x3)
Probability
Distributio
n
A (acres)
2500
6000
9000
Triangular
h (ft)
200
300
500
Triangular
0.15
0.25
0.35
Triangular
Bo (RB/STB)
1.20
1.30
1.35
Triangular
RF
0.20
0.40
Uniform
25
40
Triangular
30
2-127
Sw
0.325 0.500
(2.79)
Net Cash Flow (NCF) = (Gross Revenue - Royalty - Costs)(1 - Tax Rate)
(2.80)
(2.81)
2128
x1 x x2
f1 ( x)
2 x x1
x3
x1 x2
2-129
x1
(2.82)
x1
f1 ( x)dx
x x1
x3
x1 x2
x1
(2.83)
x1
F x3
x1
x2
x1
(2.84)
It turns out that F is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1, just like the
random number generator in spreadsheets or other computer software.
Therefore, to sample from the first part of a triangular distribution,
generate a uniformly distributed random number (Rn) between 0 and 1
and substitute it for F in Eq.(2.84) to obtain the sample value for x as
x
x1
Rn x3
x1 x2
2130
x1
(2.85)
Case 2.
x2 x x3
2 x3
f 2 ( x)
x3
x1 x3
(2.86)
x2
x2
x1
f1 ( x)dx
x
x2
f 2 ( x)dx 1
x3
x3
x1 x3
x3
x2
x2
(2.87)
x3
1 F
x3
x1
(2.88)
x3
1 Rn x3
x1
x3
x2
(2.89)
Rn
x2
x1
x3
x1
2-131
(2.90)
Rn
x2
x1
x3
x1
(2.91)
f ( x)
1
x3
(2.92)
x1
x1
f ( x)dx
x x1
x3
x1
(2.93)
x1 F x3
2132
x1
(2.94)
0.007
0.006
0.005
f(x)
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.000
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
400
500
600
x (ft)
F
1.000
0.900
0.800
0.700
0.600
F 0.500
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
0
100
200
300
x (ft)
Table 2.9: Data for Monte Carlo Sampling of Net Pay Thickness
x
f(x)
200
0.000
0.0000
0
210
0.003
0.0006
7
220
0.013
2-133
0.0013
3
230
0.030
0.0020
0
240
0.053
0.0026
7
250
0.083
0.0033
3
260
0.120
0.0040
0
270
0.163
0.0046
7
280
0.213
0.0053
3
290
0.270
0.0060
0
300
0.333
0.0066
7
310
0.398
0.0063
3
320
0.460
0.0060
0
330
0.518
0.0056
7
340
0.573
0.0053
3
350
0.625
0.0050
0
360
0.673
0.0046
7
370
0.718
0.0043
3
380
0.760
0.0040
0
390
0.798
2134
0.0036
7
400
0.833
0.0033
3
410
0.865
0.0030
0
420
0.893
0.0026
7
430
0.918
0.0023
3
440
0.940
0.0020
0
450
0.958
0.0016
7
460
0.973
0.0013
3
470
0.985
0.0010
0
480
0.993
0.0006
7
490
0.998
0.0003
3
500
1.000
0.0000
0
2-135
x1 Rn x3
x1
(2.95)
2136
A(100) = 8
Make sure every subinterval is represented in the array. A similar array
is generated with a new set of random numbers for each of the other
variables. During the first simulation iteration, the area will be sampled
from subinterval 45. To do so, generate a random number (r) between 0
and 1, say 0.263. The random number used to sample subinterval 45 is
computed as
Rn
A(1)
r
100 100
45
100
2-137
0.263
100
0.45263
(2.96)
Rn
A(2)
r
100 100
2
100
0.950
100
0.02950
(2.97)
At the end of the first 100 iterations, each of the subintervals has been
sampled once. A similar sampling procedure is applied to the other
variables.
To perform the next 100 iterations of the simulation, the sequence
in which the subintervals are sampled is picked randomly. For example,
for the second 100 iterations, the array A may look like this:
A(1) = 3
A(2) = 86
A(3) = 50
A(4) = 14
A(5) = 6
A(6) = 99
A(100) = 72
The sampling for the second 100 iterations then proceeds in the same
manner as for the first 100 iterations. Thus, the entire simulation is
performed in increments of 100 iterations until the planned total number
of iterations is achieved. Figure 2.67 shows qualitatively the effect of
2138
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Standard deviation
Skewness
Kurtosis
2-139
Gr
43560 Ah 1 S w
Bg
Bg
0.02827
RF
ZT
P
(2.98)
(2.99)
where
Gr
Bg
43560
2-141
1
V
V
P
(2.100)
T
V
P
cf
1
Vp
Vp
P
(2.101)
T
V
P
or
T
positive.
T
For many years, the petroleum industry has relied on Halls (1953)
correlation,
shown
in
Figure
2.68,
for
estimating
pore
volume
2-143
2144
with
an
increase
in
porosity.
However,
there
2-145
is
2146
There appears to be no
2-147
2148
2-149
This is due to
ct
So co
S w cw
S g cg
NOMENCLATURE
amf =
aw
A
=
=
Bg
Bo
B0
cf
(2.102)
BVI =
cf
cg
co
cw
dh
borehole diameter
di
ds1 =
slice thickness
dxo =
diffusion coefficient
Ec
electrochemical potential
Ek
electrokinetic potential
Ekmc =
FFI =
FOV =
field of view
gradient
GPE
GRO
readout gradient
Gss
Gr
permeability
cementation factor
net magnetization
Mz
saturation exponent
Nr
MNR
pressure
RF =
radiofrequency
Rf
recovery factor
Ri
Rmf =
Rn =
random number
Ro
Rs
Rt
Rw
Rxo =
Sh
hydrocarbon saturation
Sg
gas saturation
So
oil saturation
Soi
Sor =
Sxo =
Sw
water saturation
Swirr =
time
tpe
tro
temperature
T1
T2
T2gm =
T2*
T2bulk
T2surface =
TE
echo time
2152
TR
repetition time
volume of pore
Vp
pore volume
Vb
bulk volume
Vs
grain volume
atomic number
porosity
effective porosity
total
total porosity
apparent density
bulk density
electron density
fluid density
B0 =
PE
RO
voxel size
tf
tm =
tsh =
B =
(tj) =
=
noise
interpulse spacing time
2-153
=
=
air =
Lamor frequency
Lamor frequency at position r
gyromagnetic ratio
x-ray attenuation coefficient of air (= 0)
m =
2154
Carman, P.C. : "Fluid Flow Through A Granular Bed, Trans. Inst. Chem.
Eng. London (1937) 15, 150-156.
Carman, P.C. : "Determination of the Specific Surface of Powders, J. Soc.
Chem. Indus (1938) 57, 225-234.
Carpenter, C.B. and Spencer, G.B. : Measurements of the
Compressibility of Consolidated Oil-Bearing Sandstones, RI 3540,
USBM (Oct. 1940).
Coats, G.R., Xiao, L. and Prammer, M.G. : NMR Logging: Principles and
Applications, Halliburton Energy Services, Houston, 1999.
Collins, R.E. : Flow of Fluids Through Porous Materials, Research &
Engineering Consultants Inc., 1990.
Core Laboratories Inc. : Special Core Analysis, 1976.
Corey, A.T. : Mechanics of Heterogeneous Fluids in Porous Media, Water
Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1977.
Cosse, R. : Basics of Reservoir Engineering, Editions Technip, Paris,
1993.
Dobrynin, V.M. : "The Effect of Overburden Pressure on Some Properties
of Sandstones, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (Dec. 1962) 360-366.
Dunn, K.J., Bergman, D.J. and Latorraca, G.A.: Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance Petrophysical and Logging Applications, Handbook of
Geophysical Exploration, Seismic Exploration Vol. 32, Pergamon,
New York, 2002.
Fatt, I. : Pore Volume Compressibilities of Sandstone Reservoir Rocks,
Trans., AIME (1958) 213, 362-364.
Fraser, H.J. and Graton, L.C. : "Systematic Packing of Spheres - With
Particular Relation to Porosity and Permeability, J. Geol., Vol. 43,
No. 8, Nov. - Dec., 1935, 789-909.
Geertsma, J. : The Effect of Fluid Pressure Decline on Volumetric
Changes of a Porous Medium, Trans. AIME (1957) 210, 331-340.
Hall, H.N. : Compressibility of Reservoir Rocks, Trans., AIME (1953)
198, 309-311.
Haughey, D.P. and Beveridge, G.S.G. :Structural Properties of Packed
Beds - A Review, Can. J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 47 (April 1969) 130-149.
Jennings, H.J. : How to Handle and Process Soft and Unconsolidated
Cores, World Oil (June 1965) 116-119.
Jorden, J.R. and Campbell, F.L. : Well Logging I - Rock Properties,
Borehole Environment, Mud and Temperature Logging, Monograph
2-155
2156
2-157
CHAPTER 3
PERMEABILITY
3.1 DEFINITION
Permeability gives an indication of the porous mediums ability to
transmit fluids (i.e., permit fluid flow). It is defined through Darcys law. For a
horizontal system, Darcys law for single phase flow in differential form is
q
kA dP
dx
(3.1)
kA P1 P2
L
kA P
L
3-1
(3.2)
Eq(3.2) can be solved for the absolute permeability of the porous medium as
q L
A P
(3.3)
L
q
kA
(3.4)
L
kA
(3.5)
L
mA
(3.6)
3-2
Table 3.1: Pressure Drop and Flow Rate Data for Steady State Flow
Experiment in a Sandpack (from Peters, 1979).
q
(cc/s)
(atm)
0.0014
0.0476
0.0556
1.9284
0.0889
3.0573
0.1333
4.5439
0.2222
7.5303
0.3111
10.465
Figure 3.2 shows the graph of P versus q from the experiment. The data plot
as a straight line through the origin, thereby verifying the validity of Darcy's
law for the experiment. The slope of the line is m = 33.658. The permeability
is calculated with Eq.(3.6) as
105.363 115.6
33.658
4.961
2
18.72 darcys.
If the graph of Figure 3.2 were nonlinear, then Darcy's law would not be
valid for the experiment. This situation would occur if the liquid reacted with
the porous medium. An example of such a reaction would occur if the
experiment were performed on a sandstone containing a significant amount of
montmorrillonite-type clays using fresh water. Can you sketch how P would
vary with q in such an experiment?
3-3
Figure 3.2. Graph of P verus q for steady state flow of a non-reactive liquid
through an unconsolidated sandpack.
Table 3.2 compares Darcy units with oilfield units. Using the
information in the table, Eq.(3.2) can be written in oilfield units as
0.001127 kA P
B
L
(3.7)
1 kA P
887.2 B L
(3.8)
or
For radial flow into a wellbore as shown in Figure 3.3, Darcys law may
be expressed in radial coordinates in oilfield units as
3-4
0.00708kh Pe
Pw
(3.9)
r
B ln e
rw
or
1 kh Pe Pw
141.2
r
B ln e
rw
(3.10)
Darcy Unit
atm
second
cm3/s
cm
cm
fraction
darcy
cm
cp
atm-1
Oilfield Unit
psia
day
STB/D
ft
ft
fraction
millidarcy
ft
cp
psi-1
(3.11)
where the square brackets refer to the dimensions of the enclosed variable.
Using mass (M), length (L) and time (T) as the fundamental dimensions, the
dimensions of the variables on the right side of Eq.(3.11) are
L3
T
M
LT
L
L2
M
LT 2
Thus,
L3
T
L2
M
L
LT
M
LT 2
or
k
L2
(3.12)
Eq.(3.12) shows that the permeability of a porous medium has the dimensions
of length squared. This means that permeability is proportional to the square
of some characteristic dimension of the porous medium.
3-6
1darcy
9.869 x10 9 cm 2
9.869 x10
13
m 2 1.062 x10
11
ft 2
(3.13)
Darcys law for steady-state flow of an ideal gas must be used, recognizing
that the volumetric flow rate of a gas varies with pressure. For an ideal gas at
a constant temperature, Boyle's law can be written for a fixed mass of gas at
two conditions as
qP
(3.14)
qsc Psc
where qsc is the gas volumetric flow rate at a reference pressure Psc.
Substituting Eq.(3.14) into (3.1) and rearranging gives
qsc
k g A 1 dP 2
Psc 2 dx
(3.15)
qsc
P12
2 Psc
P22
L
(3.16)
kg
2qsc LPsc
A P12 P22
3-7
(3.17)
kL 1
kg
b
P
(3.18)
P1 P2
2
(3.19)
and b is a constant, which depends on the gas used in the measurement. The
absolute permeability (liquid permeability) of the medium can be determined
in the laboratory by measuring permeabilities to gas, kg, at different average
core pressures.
A graph of kg versus
1
yields a straight line with an
P
3-9
3-10
The
3-11
kor
No
(cm)
(cm)
22.9
(%)
(darcy)
(darcy)
4.81
38.98
16.43
15.82
0.96
11.20
23.6
4.84
36.37
18.36
17.99
0.98
8.66
112.8
4.96
38.38
21.89
18.05
0.82
9.18
23.7
4.81
38.94
18.93
18.33
0.97
11.34
110.5
4.83
38.91
20.52
18.50
0.90
10.83
110.0
4.81
37.61
21.91
19.40
0.89
10.48
23.6
4.84
37.49
14.19
11.03
0.78
15.26
116.1
4.96
34.66
18.28
15.57
0.85
8.32
113.0
4.96
39.62
22.99
19.90
0.87
8.61
10
115.9
4.96
35.86
19.22
15.49
0.81
12.53
11
22.8
4.84
37.52
16.23
15.19
0.94
11.20
12
110.4
4.81
37.46
20.85
18.48
0.89
10.00
13
115.9
4.97
37.80
18.54
15.53
0.84
9.29
14
110.0
4.81
38.11
22.50
18.62
0.83
8.91
15
112.8
4.97
35.48
22.72
20.90
0.92
9.92
16
23.4
4.84
34.61
14.51
9.58
0.66
11.03
17
23.6
4.84
38.60
20.87
18.49
0.89
10.15
18
23.7
4.81
35.44
12.11
11.94
0.99
12.02
3-12
kor/k
Swirr
(%)
Example 3.1
The permeability of a clean, dry core plug is to be determined. The core is
cylindrical with a diameter of 24 mm and a length of 32 mm. The core was
installed in a gas permeameter and air was flowed through it at an average
rate of 100 cm3 in 2 minutes 20 seconds, measured at atmospheric pressure
(Figure 3.8). The pressure differential across the sample was kept constant at
12 cm of mercury. The upstream gauge pressure (at the inlet of the core) was
76 cm of mercury. The gas viscosity at the test temperature was 0.01808 cp.
The barometric pressure was 76 cm of mercury.
3-13
= 0.0808 cp
kg
22 1.8422
No. The calculated permeability to gas of 30.1 md is not the true absolute
permeability of the core because of Klinkenberg effect. It is larger than the
absolute permeability of the core.
saturation is normally used for comparison with the permeability from most
pressure transient tests that involve only oil flow.
3-14
(3.20)
(3.21)
The equation of state for a slightly compressible liquid such as oil or water is
given by
o
where
c P Po
(3.22)
where
ct P
k
t
1 P
t
(3.23)
k
ct
(3.24)
3-15
and boundary conditions are used for transient pressure analysis and for
natural water influx calculations.
The constant, , is known as the diffusivity constant and can be written
as
kh
k
ct
T
S
hct
(3.25)
kh
(3.26)
(3.27)
hct
P
r2
ct P
k
t
1 P
r r
P r, 0
lim r
r
2 kh
lim P r , t
r
(3.29)
Pi
qsf
P
r
(3.28)
Pi
(3.30)
(3.31)
PD
rD2
1 PD
rD rD
PD rD , 0
PD
tD
0
3-17
(3.32)
(3.33)
lim rD
rD
PD
rD
lim PD rD , t D
rD
(3.34)
(3.35)
Pi
PD
P r, t
qsf
(3.36)
2 kh
rD
r
rw
(3.37)
kt
cr rw2
(3.38)
and
tD
In oilfield units, the dimensionless pressure and dimensionless time are given
by
PD
Pi
P r, t
q B
141.2
kh
(3.39)
and
tD
0.0002637 kt
cr rw2
(3.40)
PD x
1
Ei ( x)
2
3-18
(3.41)
where
rD2
4t D
(3.42)
and
Ei
(3.43)
dy
1
Ei
2
rD2
4t D
(3.44)
1
4t D
(3.45)
1
Ei
2
P r, t
Pi
141.2q B
kh
1
Ei
2
ct r 2
948
(3.46)
kt
and
Pwf t
P rw , t
Pi
141.2q B
kh
1
Ei
2
ct rw2
948
kt
(3.47)
3-19
Ei
(3.48)
ln x 0.5772
1
ln t D
2
PD 1, t D
0.80907 for t D
(3.49)
25
PD 1, t D
k
ct rw2
(3.50)
3.23
Pwf t
P rw , t
Pi
162.6q B
log t log
kh
k
ct rw2
3.23
(3.51)
Eq.(3.51) provides the theoretical basis for the semilog analysis of drawdown
pressure data. It shows that if the well is produced instantaneously at a
constant sandface rate, then a graph of Pwf versus logt will be linear with a
negative slope given by
162.6q B
kh
(3.52)
Pint
Pi
m log
k
ct rw2
3.23
(3.53)
The formation permeability can be calculated from the slope of the semilog
line as
162.6q B
mh
3-20
(3.54)
3-21
and the initial pressure can be calculated from the pressure intercept as
Pi
Pint
m log
k
ct rw2
3.23
(3.55)
3-22
Using Eq.(3.49), the dimensionless pressure for the buildup test can easily be
derived by applying superposition principle as follows:
PDC
1
ln t p
2
PDA
PDA
t
1
ln t D
2
PDB
(3.56)
PDB
(3.57)
0.80907
(3.58)
0.80907
PDC
tp
t
1
ln
2
t
(3.59)
Pi
tp
t
162.6q B
log
kh
t
(3.60)
tp
t
t
a negative slope given by Eq.(3.54) and a pressure intercept equal to Pi. The
formation permeability can be calculated from the slope of the Horner line and
the initial reservoir pressure can be determined by extrapolating the Horner
line to an infinite shut in time. For a bounded reservoir (in contrast to an
infinite acting reservoir), Horner pressure buildup equation takes the form
Pws
P*
tp
t
162.6q B
log
kh
t
3-23
(3.61)
where the extrapolated pressure, P*, is less than the initial reservoir pressure,
Pi .
3.4.4 Diagnostic Plots
The drawdown equation, Eq.(3.51), was derived using an internal
boundary condition in which the sandface rate increased instantaneously
from zero to a constant value. The buildup equation, Eq.(3.60), was derived
using an internal boundary condition in which the sandface rate decreased
from a constant value to zero instantaneously. Given that the wellbore
contains compressible fluids, when the well is opened for production, the
surface rate may be constant but the sandface rate will increase from zero to
a constant value over a definite period of time as shown in Figure 3.10.
Similarly, when the well is shut in at the wellhead for a pressure buildup test,
the surface rate is zero but the sandface rate will decline from its constant
value to zero over a finite period of time as shown in Figure 3.9. This
phenomenon, whereby the sandface rate lags behind the surface rate, is
known as wellbore unloading during drawdown and afterflow during buildup.
The term wellbore storage is normally used to describe the phenomenon either
during drawdown or during buildup.
Figure 3.10. Idealized and actual sandface rates during drawdown and
buildup.
3-24
PD'
dPD
d ln t D
tD
dPD
dt D
(3.62)
Figure 3.11. Semilog plot for pressure drawdown test showing deviation from
semilog line due to wellbore storage effect.
3-25
Figure 3.12. Horner plot for pressure buildiup test showing deviation from
semilog line due to wellbore storage effect.
The welltest derivative function is defined in the manner shown in Eq.(3.62) to
take advantage of the fact that the data that fit the welltest model for a
drawdown test fall on the semilog line of Eq.(3.42). Along this semilog line, the
dimensionless welltest derivative function will be a constant as shown below:
PD'
dPD
d ln t D
tD
dPD
dt D
1
2
a constant
(3.63)
P'
d P
d ln t
d P
dt
70.6
q B
kh
a constant
(3.64)
Thus, after the effect of wellbore storage has subsided, the welltest derivative
function will become constant along the semilog line. It is only the pressure
data that have a constant welltest derivative (making allowance for
fluctuations due to noise) that should be fitted to the drawdown semilog line.
3-26
P versus t and
P' versus t
superimposed on the same graph. Figure 3.13 shows typical diagnostic plots
for a pressure drawdown test affected by wellbore storage.
Figure 3.13. Diagnostic plots for pressure drawdown data affected by wellbore
storage.
The diagnostic plots can be divided into three time segments. In the first
time segment, P and P' are equal and have a unit slope on the log-log scale.
The data in this time segment are dominated 100% by wellbore storage. They
cannot be used to estimate reservoir properties. They can only be used to
estimate wellbore storage coefficient. In the second time segment,
P and
P'
separate from each other. The derivative function has a characteristic hump
indicative of wellbore storage. The magnitude of the hump is a measure of the
severity of the wellbore storage problem (and skin damage). The pressure data
3-27
in this time segment are still affected by wellbore storage but to a lesser
degree than in the first time segment. The data in this segment can be
analyzed by type curve matching to estimate approximate formation
properties. In the third time segment, the welltest derivative becomes constant
in accordance with Eq.(3.64). Data in this time segment are no longer affected
by wellbore storage and will plot on the correct semilog line of Eq.(3.51). Note
that the constant value of the welltest derivative function in this time segment
is equal to 70.6
q B
kh
the formation permeability from the derivative function. If the test ended
during the second time segment, which happens in many tests, such a test
cannot be analyzed with a semilog plot.
Figure 3.14 shows typical diagnostic plots for a pressure buildup test
affected by wellbore storage. In general, the diagnostic plots are similar to
those of a drawdown test. The only difference is that in the third time
segment, when the pressure data are no longer affected by wellbore storage,
the welltest derivative function for a buildup may not be constant but may be
distorted as shown in Figure 3.14. This distortion is caused by the fact that
an approximate
'
d P
ti
dt
ti
ti
Pi
Pi
ti ti 1
ti
ti ti
3-28
Pi
ti
ti
1
ti
Pi
1
1
ti
ti
ti ti
(3.65)
Figure 3.14. Diagnostic plots for pressure buildup data affected by wellbore
storage.
Figure 3.15 shows the pressures used to define P for drawdown and buildup
tests. For drawdown test, P is defined as
P
Pi
(3.66)
Pwf t
Pws
Pwf t p
3-29
(3.67)
P for buildup test is
Pws
Pwf t p
(3.68)
This approximation could distort the welltest derivative function after the
effect of wellbore storage has subsided. The derivative function for a pressure
buildup test can be calculated with Eq.(3.65) using actual shut in time, t, or
Horner time,
tp
t
t
te
t tp
t tp
(3.69)
3-30
Pskin
q
2 kh
(3.70)
in Darcy units or
Pskin
q B
141.2
kh
(3.71)
Pskin
Pwfundamaged
Pwfdamaged
(3.72)
Pskin
Pwfundamaged
Pwfstimulated
(3.73)
for a stimulated well. It can be seen from Figure 3.16 that Pskin and hence, S,
is positive for a damaged well and negative for a stimulated well. It can be
shown that the permeability of the altered zone, ks, is related to the true
formation permeability, k, by the equation
S
r
k
1 ln s
ks
rw
(3.74)
Eq.(3.74) contains two unknowns, ks and rs, an as such is not as useful for
estimating the skin factor as it appears to be.
3-31
PD 1, t D
1
ln t D
2
0.80907 +S for t D
25
(3.75)
PD 1, t D
k
ct rw2
3.23 0.87 S
(3.76)
Pwf t
P rw , t
162.6q B
log t log
kh
Pi
k
ct rw2
3.23 0.87 S
(3.77)
Eq.(3.77) can be solved for the skin factor from the drawdown semilog line as
S 1.1513
Pwf 1hr Pi
162.6q B
kh
log
k
ct rw2
3.23
(3.78)
S 1.1513
Pwf t p
Pws 1hr
162.6q B
kh
log
k
ct rw2
3.23
(3.79)
3-33
P
r2
ct P
k
t
1 P
r r
P r, 0
Pwf
P
r
dPwf
r rw
P r, t
(3.31)
Pi
(3.29)
Pi
lim P r , t
2 kh
(3.28)
S r
dt
P
r
(3.80)
(3.81)
r rw
V
P
Vi V (t )
Pi Pwf (t )
where
C
Vi
V(t)
Pi
3-34
(3.82)
qB
t
24C
(3.83)
qB
24
t
P
(3.84)
unit slope line
PD
rD2
1 PD
rD rD
PD rD , 0
PD
tD
lim PD rD , t D
PwD
dPwD
dt D
PD
rD
(3.33)
PD
rD
S rD
(3.35)
rD
CD
(3.32)
(3.85)
rD 1
PD
rD
(3.86)
rD
3-35
CD
C
2 ct hrw2
(3.87)
CD
5.615C
2 ct hrw2
(3.88)
in Darcy units or
in oilfield units. The larger the dimensionless wellbore storage coefficient, the
more severe is the wellbore storage problem.
The initial-boundary value problem represented by Eqs.(3.32), (3.33),
(3.35), (3.85) and (3.86) can be solved by Laplace transformation. It can be
shown that the dimensionless pressure at the wellbore in Laplace space is
given by
PwD 1, z
Ko
z 3/ 2 K1
S zK1
z 2C D K o
S zK1
(3.89)
where z is the Laplace parameter and Ko and K1 are Bessel functions of the
second kind of order 0 and 1. Eq.(3.89) can easily be inverted numerically, by
say Stehfest algorithm, to obtain the PwD function in the time domain. To
obtain the welltest derivative function, the Calculus derivative with respect to
tD in Laplace space is first obtained, inverted and multiplied by tD. The
Calculus derivative in Laplace space is given by
'
1, z
PwD
zPwD 1, z
z Ko
z 3/ 2 K1
S zK1
z 2CD K o
z
S zK1
(3.90)
Figure 3.17 shows the solutions and welltest derivative functions for
various values of CDe2S plotted on log-log scales. This family of solutions
constitutes Bourdet et al.'s wellbore storage type curves, which can be used to
analyze transient pressure tests that fit a homogeneous reservoir model with
wellbore storage and skin by type curve matching.
3-36
100
2S
1060
1050
1040
1030
1020
1015
1010
108
106
104
103
102
PwD - PwD'
10
0.1
0.1
10
100
1000
10000
tD/CD
3-37
log PwD
log P log
kh
141.2q B
(3.91)
2.951x10 4 kh
log t log
C
t
log D
CD
(3.92)
Eqs.(3.91) and (3.92) show that the graph of log PwD versus log
tD
CD
is the
same as the graph of log P versus log t with the axes shifted by the constants
log
kh
141.2q B
and log
2.951x10 4 kh
. Thus, the
C
transient pressure test can be matched graphically with the appropriate type
curve to estimate the reservoir and well parameters.
The procedure for using the Bourdet et al.'s type curves to analyze a
transient pressure test is as follows:
1. Prepare a log-log plot of
scale as the type curves. Use only major grid lines on this plot. This is
the field plot.
2. Slide the field plot over the type curves both vertically and horizontally
to obtain the best match of the PD function and the corresponding
welltest derivative function. Trace the matched type curve on the field
plot to obtain a visual record of the best match.
3. Choose a convenient match point and record PDM ,
CD e 2 S
tD
CD
, tM and
M
141.2q B PDM
h
PM
3-38
(3.93)
0.0002951kh
C
tD
CD
tM
(3.94)
1
ln
2
CD e 2 S
CD
(3.95)
Figure 3.18 shows qualitatively a type match using the Bourdet et al.'s type
curves.
3-39
0.03248
kt
ct
(3.96)
t
(hrs)
15.33000
15.33417
15.33833
15.34250
15.34667
15.35083
15.35500
15.35917
15.36333
15.36750
15.37583
15.38000
15.38833
15.39667
15.40500
15.41333
15.42583
15.43833
15.45083
15.46333
15.47583
15.49250
15.50917
15.52583
15.54250
15.55917
15.58000
t
(hrs)
0.00000
0.00417
0.00833
0.01250
0.01667
0.02083
0.02500
0.02917
0.03333
0.03750
0.04583
0.05000
0.05833
0.06667
0.07500
0.08333
0.09583
0.10833
0.12083
0.13333
0.14583
0.16250
0.17917
0.19583
0.21250
0.22917
0.25000
3-40
Pws
(psia)
3086.33
3090.57
3093.81
3096.55
3100.03
3103.27
3106.77
3110.01
3113.25
3116.49
3119.48
3122.48
3128.96
3135.92
3141.17
3147.64
3161.95
3170.68
3178.39
3187.12
3194.24
3205.96
3216.68
3227.89
3238.37
3249.07
3261.79
15.62167
15.66333
15.70500
15.74667
15.78833
15.83000
15.87167
15.91333
15.95500
15.99667
16.03833
16.08000
16.14250
16.20500
16.26750
16.33000
16.39250
16.45500
16.51750
16.58000
16.64250
16.70500
16.76750
16.83000
16.95500
17.08000
17.20500
17.33000
17.58000
17.70500
17.83000
18.08000
18.33000
18.58000
18.83000
19.08000
19.33000
19.58000
19.83000
20.08000
20.33000
20.58000
20.83000
21.08000
21.33000
21.58000
22.08000
22.58000
23.08000
23.58000
0.29167
0.33333
0.37500
0.41667
0.45833
0.50000
0.54167
0.58333
0.62500
0.66667
0.70833
0.75000
0.81250
0.87500
0.93750
1.00000
1.06250
1.12500
1.18750
1.25000
1.31250
1.37500
1.43750
1.50000
1.62500
1.75000
1.87500
2.00000
2.25000
2.37500
2.50000
2.75000
3.00000
3.25000
3.50000
3.75000
4.00000
4.25000
4.50000
4.75000
5.00000
5.25000
5.50000
5.75000
6.00000
6.25000
6.75000
7.25000
7.75000
8.25000
3-41
3287.21
3310.15
3334.34
3356.27
3374.98
3394.44
3413.90
3433.83
3448.05
3466.26
3481.97
3493.69
3518.63
3537.34
3553.55
3571.75
3586.23
3602.95
3617.41
3631.15
3640.86
3652.85
3664.32
3673.81
3692.27
3705.52
3719.26
3732.23
3749.71
3757.19
3763.44
3774.65
3785.11
3794.06
3799.80
3809.50
3815.97
3820.20
3821.95
3823.70
3826.45
3829.69
3832.64
3834.70
3837.19
3838.94
3838.02
3840.78
3843.01
3844.52
24.08000
24.58000
25.08000
25.58000
26.08000
26.58000
27.08000
27.58000
28.08000
28.58000
29.08000
29.83000
30.58000
31.33000
32.08000
32.83000
33.58000
34.33000
35.08000
35.83000
36.58000
37.58000
38.58000
39.58000
40.58000
41.58000
42.58000
43.83000
45.33000
8.75000
9.25000
9.75000
10.25000
10.75000
11.25000
11.75000
12.25000
12.75000
13.25000
13.75000
14.50000
15.25000
16.00000
16.75000
17.50000
18.25000
19.00000
19.75000
20.50000
21.25000
22.25000
23.25000
24.25000
25.25000
26.25000
27.25000
28.50000
30.00000
3846.27
3847.51
3848.52
3850.01
3850.75
3851.76
3852.50
3853.51
3854.25
3855.07
3855.50
3856.50
3857.25
3857.99
3858.74
3859.48
3859.99
3860.73
3860.99
3861.49
3862.24
3862.74
3863.22
3863.48
3863.99
3864.49
3864.73
3865.23
3865.74
15.33 hours
174 STB/D
Wellbore radius
0.29 ft
Formation thickness
107 ft
Porosity
25 %
Total compressibility
4.2x10-6 psi-1
1.06 RB/STB
Oil viscosity
2.5 cp
3-42
a.
b.
Analyze the test data and determine the formation permeability, the
total skin factor and the initial reservoir pressure.
c.
d.
The pertinent data for the diagnostic plots and Horner plot are shown in
Table 3.6.
Table 3.6: Calculated Values of P and P'
te
(hrs)
Horner
Pws
Time
(psia)
(hrs)
(hrs)
(psi)
15.33000
0.00000
15.33417
0.00417
0.00417
3677.26
3090.57
4.24
15.33833
0.00833
0.00833
1841.34
3093.81
15.34250
0.01250
0.01249
1227.40
15.34667
0.01667
0.01665
15.35083
0.02083
15.35500
P ' wrt te
P ' wrt t
(psi)
(psi)
7.48
5.98
5.98
3096.55
10.22
9.33
9.32
920.62
3100.03
13.70
13.46
13.45
0.02080
736.96
3103.27
16.94
16.88
16.85
0.02500
0.02496
614.20
3106.77
20.44
20.24
20.20
15.35917
0.02917
0.02911
526.54
3110.01
23.68
22.73
22.69
15.36333
0.03333
0.03326
460.95
3113.25
26.92
25.98
25.93
15.36750
0.03750
0.03741
409.80
3116.49
30.16
23.96
23.91
15.37583
0.04583
0.04569
335.50
3119.48
33.15
27.55
27.46
15.38000
0.05000
0.04984
307.60
3122.48
36.15
37.07
36.95
15.38833
0.05833
0.05811
263.82
3128.96
42.63
47.21
47.03
3086.33
3-43
15.39667
0.06667
0.06638
230.94
3135.92
49.59
49.03
48.82
15.40500
0.07500
0.07463
205.40
3141.17
54.84
53.03
52.76
15.41333
0.08333
0.08288
184.97
3147.64
61.31
77.43
76.99
15.42583
0.09583
0.09523
160.97
3161.95
75.62
88.83
88.32
15.43833
0.10833
0.10757
142.51
3170.68
84.35
71.73
71.24
15.45083
0.12083
0.11989
127.87
3178.39
92.06
80.09
79.46
15.46333
0.13333
0.13218
115.98
3187.12
100.79
85.25
84.53
15.47583
0.14583
0.14446
106.12
3194.24
107.91
92.29
91.40
15.49250
0.16250
0.16080
95.34
3205.96
119.63
110.52
109.37
15.50917
0.17917
0.17710
86.56
3216.68
130.35
119.27
117.89
15.52583
0.19583
0.19336
79.28
3227.89
141.56
129.06
127.44
15.54250
0.21250
0.20959
73.14
3238.37
152.04
136.87
135.00
15.55917
0.22917
0.22579
67.89
3249.07
162.74
146.06
143.92
15.58000
0.25000
0.24599
62.32
3261.79
175.46
155.10
152.61
15.62167
0.29167
0.28622
53.56
3287.21
200.88
172.44
169.27
15.66333
0.33333
0.32624
46.99
3310.15
223.82
192.65
188.52
15.70500
0.37500
0.36605
41.88
3334.34
248.01
212.55
207.52
15.74667
0.41667
0.40564
37.79
3356.27
269.94
208.64
203.21
15.78833
0.45833
0.44502
34.45
3374.98
288.65
216.24
209.94
15.83000
0.50000
0.48421
31.66
3394.44
308.11
241.12
233.50
15.87167
0.54167
0.52318
29.30
3413.90
327.57
265.11
256.05
15.91333
0.58333
0.56195
27.28
3433.83
347.50
247.95
239.07
15.95500
0.62500
0.60052
25.53
3448.05
361.72
253.29
243.21
15.99667
0.66667
0.63889
23.99
3466.26
379.93
283.06
271.37
16.03833
0.70833
0.67705
22.64
3481.97
395.64
243.76
233.17
16.08000
0.75000
0.71502
21.44
3493.69
407.36
258.62
246.28
16.14250
0.81250
0.77160
19.87
3518.63
432.30
298.44
283.73
16.20500
0.87500
0.82775
18.52
3537.34
451.01
258.25
244.44
16.26750
0.93750
0.88347
17.35
3553.55
467.22
273.98
258.07
16.33000
1.00000
0.93876
16.33
3571.75
485.42
278.26
261.44
16.39250
1.06250
0.99363
15.43
3586.23
499.90
283.74
265.20
16.45500
1.12500
1.04809
14.63
3602.95
516.62
301.05
280.62
16.51750
1.18750
1.10213
13.91
3617.41
531.08
288.60
267.90
16.58000
1.25000
1.15576
13.26
3631.15
544.82
253.30
234.50
16.64250
1.31250
1.20899
12.68
3640.86
554.53
247.56
227.85
3-44
16.70500
1.37500
1.26182
12.15
3652.85
566.52
281.16
258.06
16.76750
1.43750
1.31426
11.66
3664.32
577.99
263.46
241.04
16.83000
1.50000
1.36631
11.22
3673.81
587.48
247.74
225.68
16.95500
1.62500
1.46926
10.43
3692.27
605.94
227.42
206.12
17.08000
1.75000
1.57070
9.76
3705.52
619.19
210.56
188.93
17.20500
1.87500
1.67066
9.18
3719.26
632.93
224.74
200.33
17.33000
2.00000
1.76919
8.67
3732.23
645.90
208.37
184.96
17.58000
2.25000
1.96203
7.81
3749.71
663.38
162.84
142.20
17.70500
2.37500
2.05641
7.45
3757.19
670.86
150.46
130.44
17.83000
2.50000
2.14947
7.13
3763.44
677.11
140.26
120.70
18.08000
2.75000
2.33172
6.57
3774.65
688.32
140.46
119.19
18.33000
3.00000
2.50900
6.11
3785.11
698.78
138.98
116.46
18.58000
3.25000
2.68151
5.72
3794.06
707.73
115.07
95.49
18.83000
3.50000
2.84944
5.38
3799.80
713.47
133.68
108.08
19.08000
3.75000
3.01297
5.09
3809.50
723.17
150.18
121.27
19.33000
4.00000
3.17227
4.83
3815.97
729.64
107.37
85.60
19.58000
4.25000
3.32750
4.61
3820.20
733.87
64.24
50.83
19.83000
4.50000
3.47882
4.41
3821.95
735.62
40.75
31.50
20.08000
4.75000
3.62637
4.23
3823.70
737.37
56.31
42.75
20.33000
5.00000
3.77029
4.07
3826.45
740.12
79.61
59.90
20.58000
5.25000
3.91071
3.92
3829.69
743.36
87.17
65.00
20.83000
5.50000
4.04777
3.79
3832.64
746.31
74.57
55.11
21.08000
5.75000
4.18157
3.67
3834.70
748.37
72.12
52.33
21.33000
6.00000
4.31224
3.56
3837.19
750.86
70.51
50.88
21.58000
6.25000
4.43987
3.45
3838.94
752.61
34.46
25.33
22.08000
6.75000
4.68648
3.27
3838.02
751.69
19.52
12.42
22.58000
7.25000
4.92217
3.11
3840.78
754.45
53.06
36.18
23.08000
7.75000
5.14764
2.98
3843.01
756.68
43.29
28.98
23.58000
8.25000
5.36355
2.86
3844.52
758.19
41.52
26.89
24.08000
8.75000
5.57049
2.75
3846.27
759.94
40.82
26.16
24.58000
9.25000
5.76902
2.66
3847.51
761.18
33.25
20.81
25.08000
9.75000
5.95963
2.57
3848.52
762.19
40.20
24.38
25.58000
10.25000
6.14279
2.50
3850.01
763.68
37.65
22.86
26.08000
10.75000
6.31892
2.43
3850.75
764.42
32.21
18.81
26.58000
11.25000
6.48843
2.36
3851.76
765.43
33.95
19.69
3-45
27.08000
11.75000
6.65168
2.30
3852.50
766.17
36.54
20.56
27.58000
12.25000
6.80901
2.25
3853.51
767.18
38.36
21.44
28.08000
12.75000
6.96074
2.20
3854.25
767.92
36.51
19.89
28.58000
13.25000
7.10716
2.16
3855.07
768.74
30.55
16.56
29.08000
13.75000
7.24854
2.11
3855.50
769.17
27.64
14.43
29.83000
14.50000
7.45173
2.06
3856.50
770.17
32.70
16.92
30.58000
15.25000
7.64495
2.01
3857.25
770.92
30.23
15.15
31.33000
16.00000
7.82892
1.96
3857.99
771.66
32.51
15.89
32.08000
16.75000
8.00429
1.92
3858.74
772.41
34.83
16.64
32.83000
17.50000
8.17164
1.88
3859.48
773.15
30.98
14.58
33.58000
18.25000
8.33152
1.84
3859.99
773.66
33.60
15.21
34.33000
19.00000
8.48442
1.81
3860.73
774.40
27.78
12.67
35.08000
19.75000
8.63077
1.78
3860.99
774.66
23.22
10.01
35.83000
20.50000
8.77100
1.75
3861.49
775.16
40.28
17.08
36.58000
21.25000
8.90548
1.72
3862.24
775.91
39.27
16.70
37.58000
22.25000
9.07644
1.69
3862.74
776.41
26.72
10.90
38.58000
23.25000
9.23853
1.66
3863.22
776.89
21.33
8.60
39.58000
24.25000
9.39243
1.63
3863.48
777.15
24.52
9.34
40.58000
25.25000
9.53875
1.61
3863.99
777.66
33.76
12.75
41.58000
26.25000
9.67803
1.58
3864.49
778.16
25.91
9.71
42.58000
27.25000
9.81077
1.56
3864.73
778.40
23.88
8.48
43.83000
28.50000
9.96817
1.54
3865.23
778.90
30.25
10.62
45.33000
30.00000
10.14560
1.51
3865.74
779.41
The diagnostic plots depicted in Figure 3.19 show the classic response of a
homogeneous reservoir model with wellbore storage and skin. From the
welltest derivative function, it would appear that the effect of wellbore storage
had subsided at about 10 hrs, in which case, the pressure data beyond 10 hrs
might be fitted to the Horner semilog line. Notice the noise in the derivative
function. This is not surprising because numerical differentiation is a noisy
process. The wellbore storage coefficient can be calculated from the unit slope
line as
3-46
174 1.06
24
1
800
0.0096 RB/psi
CD
5.615 0.0096
2
107 0.29
9.09 x102
Figure 3.20 shows the Horner plot. The Horner straight line is given by
Pws
3-47
15.33
t
8.92 md
3785.35 psia
3-48
S 1.1513
3086.33 3785.35
78.52
log
8.92
0.25 2.5 4.20 x10
0.29
3.23
5.21
Pi
P*
3880.6 psia.
The radius of investigation for the drawdown portion of the test is given by
rinv
0.03248
8.92 15.33
0.25 2.5 4.20 x10
234 ft
The radius of investigation for the buildup portion of the test is given by
rinv
0.03248
8.92 30
0.25 2.5 4.20 x10
330 ft
The buildup test cannot investigate what the drawdown did not investigate.
Therefore, the radius of investigation of the buildup test test is obtained from
the drawdown portion of the test as 234 ft. The reservoir bulk volume
investigated by the test is given by
2
rinv
h
2342 107
18.406 x106 ft 3
3-49
wellbore storage and skin can be used to simulate the test by a trial and error
procedure.
Figures 3.21 through 3.23 show graphical comparisons of the simulated
test and the field test. Figure 3.21 compares the pressure buildup responses;
Figure 3.22 compares the log-diagnostic plots; and Figure 3.23 compares the
Horner plots. Clearly, the agreement between the simulated test and the field
test is good. The best match was obtained with the following parameters:
k
9.4 md
CD
9 x102
CD e 2 S
Pwf t p
Pi
1.46 x108
3089.46 psia
3880.60 psia
Thus, the simulation serves to fine tune the parameters obtained by the
conventional semilog analysis of the test.
ct M
k
t
1 M
t
(3.97)
M ( P)
Po
2P
dP
Z
(3.98)
PD
M Pi
M Pwf
(3.99)
1422qscT
kh
where
qsc = gas production rate, Mscf/D
T = absolute temperature of the reservoir, Rankine (R = F+460)
The semilog drawdown line is given
M Pwf
M Pi
1637qscT
log t log
kh
3-52
k
ct rw2
3.23 0.87 S
(3.100)
The gas velocity in the reservoir can be quite high given the low viscosity of
gas. This could lead to non-darcy flow with an additional pressure drop above
that of darcy flow. The effect of non-darcy flow can be expressed as a skin
factor as shown in Section 3.12. As a result, the total skin factor for a gas well
test, S, is normally split into the sum of two skin factors S* and Dqsc, where D
is a non-darcy coefficient and S* is the part of the total skin factor that does
not include the non-darcy effect. With this modification, Eq.(3.100) becomes
M Pwf
M Pi
1637qscT
log t log
kh
k
2
i cti rw
1637 qscT
kh
(3.102)
from which the formation permeability can be determined. The total skin
factor for drawdown test is given by
S 1.1513
M Pwf
1hr
M Pi
1637 qscT
kh
log
k
2
i cti rw
(3.103)
3.23
M P*
tp
t
1637 qscT
log
kh
t
versus log
(3.104)
tp
t
t
will be linear
1637 qscT
kh
(3.96)
from which the formation permeability can be determined. The total skin
3-53
S 1.1513
M Pwf
M Pws
1hr
1637 qscT
kh
k
cr
log
* * 2
t w
(3.105)
3.23
where M(Pws)1hr is obtained from the semilog straight line or its extrapolation,
and
Diagnostic plots
should be used to screen the M(P) data for wellbore storage in the manner
described for oil welltests to determine the correct semilog lines if any.
The M(P) function for a dry gas reservoir can be computed in advance
using the gas properties. To do so requires the ability to estimate the gas Z
factor and viscosity as functions of pressure and temperature. Correlations
exist for these functions in the literature. Table 3.7 shows the gas properties
and the M(P) function for a dry gas reservoir with the following properties:
Reservoir temperature
Pseudocritical pressure
= 665.0 psia
Pseudocritical temperature
= 374.9 R
= 62.368 lb mass/cu ft
P/Z
Bg
cg
M(P)
(psia)
(psia)
(ft3/Mscf)
(lbm/ft3)
(106/psi)
(cp)
(psia2/cp)
200
0.986
203
98.120
0.505
5066.65
0.01393
2.8933E+06
400
0.974
411
48.428
1.024
2562.91
0.01413
1.1625E+07
600
0.962
624
31.895
1.554
1725.07
0.01437
2.6130E+07
800
0.951
841
23.656
2.095
1303.13
0.01466
4.6298E+07
1000
0.942
1062
18.736
2.646
1047.10
0.01498
7.1964E+07
3-54
1200
0.934
1285
15.477
3.203
873.69
0.01534
1.0292E+08
1400
0.927
1511
13.169
3.764
747.30
0.01573
1.3890E+08
1600
0.921
1737
11.456
4.327
650.20
0.01616
1.7962E+08
1800
0.917
1962
10.140
4.888
572.64
0.01661
2.2476E+08
2000
0.915
2186
9.102
5.446
508.85
0.01710
2.7397E+08
2200
0.914
2406
8.267
5.996
455.22
0.01760
3.2690E+08
2400
0.915
2623
7.583
6.537
409.42
0.01813
3.8321E+08
2600
0.917
2836
7.015
7.066
369.82
0.01868
4.4254E+08
2800
0.920
3043
6.538
7.582
335.30
0.01924
5.0455E+08
3000
0.925
3244
6.133
8.082
305.01
0.01982
5.6894E+08
3200
0.931
3438
5.786
8.567
278.31
0.02040
6.3540E+08
3400
0.938
3626
5.486
9.036
254.68
0.02100
7.0367E+08
3600
0.945
3808
5.225
9.488
233.71
0.02159
7.7350E+08
3800
0.954
3982
4.995
9.923
215.03
0.02220
8.4466E+08
4000
0.964
4150
4.793
10.341
198.36
0.02280
9.1697E+08
4200
0.974
4312
4.614
10.744
183.45
0.02340
9.9024E+08
4400
0.985
4467
4.454
11.130
170.07
0.02400
1.0643E+09
4600
0.997
4616
4.310
11.501
158.03
0.02460
1.1391E+09
4800
1.009
4759
4.181
11.857
147.19
0.02520
1.2144E+09
5000
1.021
4896
4.063
12.199
137.39
0.02579
1.2901E+09
5200
1.034
5028
3.957
12.528
128.52
0.02637
1.3662E+09
5400
1.048
5154
3.859
12.843
120.47
0.02695
1.4426E+09
5600
1.061
5276
3.770
13.147
113.14
0.02753
1.5192E+09
5800
1.075
5393
3.689
13.439
106.46
0.02810
1.5959E+09
6000
1.090
5506
3.613
13.719
100.37
0.02866
1.6727E+09
6200
1.104
5614
3.543
13.990
94.79
0.02921
1.7496E+09
6400
1.119
5719
3.479
14.250
89.67
0.02976
1.8265E+09
6600
1.134
5820
3.418
14.501
84.96
0.03030
1.9033E+09
6800
1.149
5917
3.362
14.743
80.63
0.03084
1.9801E+09
7000
1.165
6011
3.310
14.977
76.64
0.03137
2.0568E+09
3-55
3-56
volume (S) is
S
Surface Area
Bulk Volume
4 L2
L3
4
m 2 / m3
L
(3.106)
3-57
L3 1
4 3
r
3
(3.107)
Area
L3 1
x4 r 2
4 3
r
3
3L3 1
r
(3.108)
The wetted area per unit bulk volume (specific surface area) is given by
3L3 1
r
31
r
1
L3
m 2 / m3
(3.109)
Let us examine some numerical values. Let L = 1 meter and let the porous
medium consist of very fine sand with a grain diameter of 100 x10
50 x10
meter (r =
meter) and a porosity of 28%. Figure 1.1 gives the diameters of the
grains of various clastic rocks. The specific surface area for the pipe flow is
4m 2 / m3
3 1 .28
50 x10 6
43200 m 2 / m3
Thus, the specific surface area of the porous medium is 10,800 times that of
the pipe. Since the fluid velocity is zero at the wetted surface during flow (no
slip condition), it is obvious that much more energy will be required to sustain
the same volumetric flow rate through the porous medium than through the
pipe, everything else being equal. Put another way, it is obvious that the
porous medium is much less permeable than the pipe.
Let us examine the effect of grain size on the specific surface area of the
porous medium, and hence the permeability, by changing the grain size to a
fine silt with a grain diameter of 10 x10
meter (r = 5 x10
3 1 .28
5 x10 6
432000 m 2 / m3
3-58
Thus, the specific surface area of the fine silt has increased by a factor of 10
compared to the very fine sand. Using the same argument as before, it is
obvious that the silt will be less permeable than the fine sand. Therefore,
permeability decreases as the grain size decreases.
Example 3.2
An idealized petroleum reservoir consists of an unconsolidated sand of
uniform grain size. The sand grains were deposited in such a way as to give
the closest packing possible with spherical grains. This extremely well-sorted,
homogeneous and isotropic reservoir has the following dimensions:
Length
3 miles
Width
2 miles
Thickness
250 feet
Grain diameter
3 1 0.259
0.0125 / 2
355.68 cm 2 / cm3
SxVb
4.212 x1017 cm 2
5280 x30.48
cm / mile
4.212 x1017 cm 2
It should be observed that the wetted surface area for the idealized
reservoir is enormous and would be considerably more if the grains were of
clay sized particles. This enormous surface area has implications for the
occurrence of surface phenomena in reservoir rocks.
3.5.3 Sorting
Poor sorting reduces the pore size and consequently reduces the
permeability of a medium (Table 3.8).
3.5.4 Cementation
Cementation reduces the pore size and consequently reduces the
permeability of the rock.
3.5.5 Layering
Permeability is a tensor and can therefore be different in different
directions. Because of layering in sedimentary rocks, horizontal permeabilities
in petroleum reservoirs tend to be higher than vertical permeabilities in the
absence of vertical fractures.
3-60
diameter or specific surface area and permeability. However, these have very
limited applications.
In the same depositional and diagenetic environment, there is
sometimes a reasonable relationship between porosity and permeability,
although for a given porosity, permeabilities can vary widely.
Figure 3.25
ln k
(3.110)
ln k
0.327
3.049
with the square of the correlation coefficient (R2) equal to 0.3514. The
correlation is weak.
3-62
Sample
No
(%)
(md)
31.2
2719
30.4
1382
24.8
3.3
28.5
215
33
151
3-63
31
426
30.3
1072
9.2
0.0012
22
32.1
10
22.8
83.2
11
20.4
4.56
12
19
311
13
18.6
7.47
14
20.9
20.5
15
21.7
52.5
16
14.8
4.17
17
17.6
10.9
18
11.3
4.5
19
11
20
10.1
2.8
21
10.4
3.4
22
13.7
2.1
23
12.8
1.3
24
12.2
7.3
25
11.7
4.8
26
17.2
91.9
27
16.7
190.4
28
18.6
424.9
29
18.3
270.3
30
18.3
137.3
31
16.3
28.5
32
15.6
200.5
33
17.2
36.5
34
16.4
243.2
35
18.3
337.3
36
18.1
39.9
37
14.9
64.6
38
19.6
669.5
39
18.3
540.5
40
18.8
890.4
3-64
41
17.8
429.8
42
16.1
0.011
43
18
0.52
44
16.6
0.52
45
16.1
0.087
46
17.2
12.1
47
22.5
5.97
48
19.6
1.72
49
12.7
0.063
50
15.2
0.93
51
19.1
20.3
52
14.8
4.72
53
20.5
45
54
20.5
45
55
23.9
663
56
23.8
591
57
22.9
511
58
21.6
478
59
22.2
131
60
22.3
1305
61
16.8
621
62
6.3
10.4
63
24.6
1425
64
24.3
2590
65
20
0.849
66
21.9
67
6.3
0.003
68
19.8
0.499
69
31.3
139
70
25.7
12.6
71
14.7
1.68
3-65
3-68
Such
qi
r 4 p1 p2
8
Le
r4 p
8 Le
(3.111)
where
q1 = volumetric flow rate for a single capillary tube, cm3/s
r = the radius of the capillary tubes, cm
P = pressure drop across the medium, dynes/cm2
= fluid viscosity, poise
Le = tortuous length of the capillary tube, cm
For n capillary tubes,
qT
n r 4 p1 p2
8
Le
n r4 p
8
Le
(3.112)
where qT is the total volumetric flow rate for the porous medium. The porosity
of the medium is given by
3-69
Vp
Vb
n r 2 Le
AT L
(3.113)
where AT is the total cross-sectional area and L is the length of the porous
medium. Solving Eq.(3.113) for AT gives
AT
n r 2 Le
L
(3.114)
The integrated form of Darcy's law for single phase flow through the medium
is given by
qT
kAT
P
L
(3.115)
n r4 L
8 AT Le
(3.116)
Substituting Eq.(3.114) into (3.116) gives the permeability for the model as
r2
8 Le / L
(3.117)
Le
L
(3.118)
r2
8
(3.119)
2 nrLe
nr 2 Le
Sp
2
r
(3.120)
2 S p2
3-71
(3.121)
ko S p2
(3.122)
(3.123)
5S p2
(3.124)
Sp
ko S 2
(3.125)
Ss
3-72
(3.126)
Substituting Eq.(3.126) into (3.122) gives yet another version of the CarmanKozeny equation as
3
ko S s2 1
(3.127)
Volume of Pore
Wetted Surface Area of Pore
1
Sp
(3.128)
rH
n r 2 Le
2 nrLe
r
2
(3.129)
rH2
2
(3.130)
3-73
Ss
Dp / 2
Dp / 2
6
Dp
(3.131)
D p2
3
2
36ko 1
(3.132)
D p2
72 1
(3.133)
adsorption methods, (3) the heat of wetting method and (4) a method based on
fluid flow developed by Kozeny.
Example 3.3
Estimate the permeability of the idealized petroleum reservoir of Example 3.2.
Solution to Example 3.3
Since the specific surface area with respect to bulk volume (S) is available
from Example 3.2, Eq.(3.125), which contains S is the most convenient
version of the Carman-Kozeny equation to use for the permeability
esstimation. Substituting numerical values into Eq.(3.125) gives
3-74
0.259
5 355.68
2.7467 x10 8 cm 2
2.7467 x10 8 cm 2
9.869 x10 9 cm 2 / darcy
2.78 darcys
3.8.2 Tortuosity
Based on the bundle of capillary tube model, we see that tortuosity is a
geometric property of the porous medium that reflects the length of the flow
path at the pore level as the fluid flows around the grain obstacles relative to
the length of the porous medium. Therefore, the lower the porosity, the higher
the tortuosity should be. Winsauer et al. (1952) have measured the tortuosity
of sandstones along with other properties. The tortuosity was measured
electrically based on the analogy between the flow of electrical current and
fluid flow. Their results are shown in Table 3.10. They defined tortuosity as
(Le/L). Their original data have been squared to obtain the more current
definition of tortuosity.
Table 3.10: Tortuosity and Other Data from Winsauer et al., 1952.
Porosity
Permeability
Resistivity
Factor
md
(Le/L)
(Le/L)2
17.0
90
23.3
2.30
5.29
14.7
51.0
3.30
10.89
6.7
67.0
3.20
10.24
17.6
220
16.6
2.00
4.00
26.3
1920
8.6
1.60
2.56
25.6
4400
9.4
1.60
2.56
13.9
145
33.0
2.40
5.76
18.6
25
22.9
2.30
5.29
18.8
410
18.6
2.00
4.00
Core
No
3-75
Tortuosity
10
16.1
42.0
3.20
10.24
11
15.0
41.0
2.90
8.41
12
22.1
200
13.1
1.90
3.61
13
20.6
36
16.6
2.10
4.41
14
30.7
70
8.4
1.70
2.89
15
16.4
330
21.1
2.10
4.41
16
18.8
98
19.3
2.20
4.84
17
24.8
1560
10.8
1.80
3.24
18
19.1
36
17.2
2.30
5.29
19
29.8
1180
8.4
1.75
3.06
20
27.1
3200
11.7
2.05
4.20
21
28.2
2100
10.9
2.05
4.20
22
19.4
24.0
2.50
6.25
23
19.7
18
20.8
2.35
5.52
24
31.5
2200
6.9
1.50
2.25
25
19.3
19
24.4
2.70
7.29
26
27.3
88
12.4
2.20
4.84
27
25.1
370
11.6
1.97
3.88
28
15.0
115
37.3
2.90
8.41
29
18.4
130
19.0
2.00
4.00
4.7
1.37
1.88
30
31
39.5
flow path for electric current and for fluid flow, a property that obstructs one
will also obstruct the other. Hence, tortuosity and formation resistivity factor
should be positively correlated.
3-77
An
approximate
relationship
between
tortuosity
and
formation
ro
Ro
L
A
(3.134)
where Ro is the resistivity of the core fully saturated with the water. The
electrical current in the core is conducted by the water alone since the rock
minerals are nonconductors. Let us replace the core with the same volume of
water in a test tube such that the resistance of the water is equal to that of
the saturated core. Since the electrical current in the core follows a tortuous
path in flowing from one end to the other, the length of the equivalent water
3-78
Ae Le
AL
(3.135)
The equivalent water circuit must have the same volume as the water in the
core to maintain the same salinity. The resistance of the equivalent water
circuit is given by
rw
Le
Ae
Rw
(3.136)
L2e
AL
Rw
(3.137)
Since the equivalent water circuit has the same resistance as the saturated
core, Eqs.(3.134) and (3.137) give
Ro
L
A
L2e
AL
Rw
(3.138)
Le
L
(3.139)
(3.140)
function (pdf) for the pore size (pore diameter) distribution, we wish to
calculate the permeability of the bundle of capillary tubes model.
Consider the probability density function for pore diameter distribution
as shown in Figure 3.32. The probability density function satisfies
(3.141)
and +d and n be the
nf
(3.142)
3-80
and +d
dAc
nf
(3.143)
Ac
n
4
nR 2
4
(3.144)
(3.145)
The cross-sectional area occupied by all the pores is related to the crosssectional area of the porous medium by the porosity as
Ac
(3.146)
AT
4 AT
R2
(3.147)
and
+d
is
dqT
128
P
nf
Le
(3.148)
The total volumetric flow rate for the porous medium is obtained by
integrating Eq.(3.148) as
qT
n P
128 Le
(3.149)
qT
A
comparison
of
AT P
32 Le R 2
Eq.(3.150)
with
(3.150)
Darcy's
law,
Eq.(3.115),
gives
the
32 Le / L R 2
(3.151)
32
(3.152)
32
(3.153)
Example 3.4
The probability density function for the pore size distribution of a bundle of
capillary tubes model is given by a triangular distribution as shown in Figure
3.33. The porosity of the medium is 15%. If the minimum pore diameter ( 1) =
0 m, the most likely pore diameter ( 2) = 8 m and the largest pore diameter
( 3) = 10 m, calculate the permeability of the medium. Assume a tortuosity of
1.0.
3-82
Figure 3.33. Probability density function for pore size distribution for Example
32
2
1
f1
f1
2
3
f2
f2
(3.154)
f1
3
1
1
f2
3
(3.155)
3
1
(3.156)
3-83
0.15 2.241x103
1
32 1.0 4.067 x10
m2
2.583x10 13 m 2
9.869 x10 13 m 2 / darcy
0.2617 darcy
261.7md
w2 A P
12 L
(3.157)
w2 2
cm
12
(3.158)
Example 3.5
Calculate the permeability of a fracture of width 2 millimeters.
Solution to Example 3.5
The fracture permeability is given by Eq.(3.158) as
2
0.20 cm 2
1
x
9
12
9.869 x10 cm 2 / darcy
The permeability of the fracture is enormous and therein lies the benefit of
fracturing for the improvement of the productivity of a well.
3-84
i 1
n
i 1
Li
Li
ki
L
Li
1 ki
n
i
(3.159)
where L Is total length of the porous medium in the flow direction, Li is the
length of bed i and ki is the permeability of bed i.
3-85
ln re / rw
ln ri / ri
ki
1
n
i
(3.160)
1
where re is the well's drainage radius and r0 is equal to the wellbore radius, rw
For linear beds in parallel (Figure 3.37), the total volumetric flow rate is
the sum of the flow rate of each bed and the pressure drop is the same for all
the beds. For n beds in parallel, the average permeability is given by
n
ki Ai
(3.161)
i 1
n
Ai
i 1
where Ai is the area of bed i and ki is the permeability of bed i. If the beds
have the same width, then
n
ki hi
i 1
n
(3.162)
hi
i 1
For radial beds in parallel (Figure 3.38), the total volumetric flow rate is
the sum of the flow rate of each bed and the pressure drop is the same for all
the beds.
Eq.(3.162).
3-87
kA dP
g
dz
6
ds 1.0133 x10 ds
(3.163)
where
q
dP
ds
1 atm =
1.0133x106 dynes/cm2
The sign convention for applying Darcy's law for inclined flow is as follows. If
the z direction is positive upwards as shown in Figure 3.39, then the positive
3-88
Figure 3.39. Coordinate system for applying Darcy's law for z positive
upwards.
kA dP
g
dz
6
ds 1.0133 x10 ds
(3.164)
kA dP
g
dz
6
ds 1.0133 x10 ds
3-89
(3.165)
Figure 3.40. Coordinate system for applying Darcy's law for z positive
downwards.
dz
in Eqs.(3.163) to (3.165) could be written as sin , where
ds
q
where
0.001127
kA dP
dz
0.433
ds
ds
(3.166)
is the specific gravity of the fluid and 0.433 is the pressure gradient of
kA d
ds
3-90
(3.167)
gz
1.0133x106
(3.168)
in Darcy units or
(3.169)
P 0.433 z
in oilfield units. Eq.(3.167) shows that flow will occur in the direction of
decreasing velocity potential. Note that for inclined systems, flow does not
necessarily occur in the direction of decreasing pressure. For example, for a
static system in which the porous medium is oriented vertically, the pressure
at the top of the medium is less than at the bottom and yet there is no flow.
Eq.(3.156) may also be written as
vs
q
A
k g
1.0133 x106
d 1.0133 x106 P
ds
g
(3.170)
vi
vs
(3.171)
vs
q
A
dh
ds
(3.172)
where
k g
1.0133x106
and
3-91
(3.173)
P
g
(3.174)
1US gal/day ft 2
1 darcy
9.613x10
4.08 x10 2 m / d
(3.175)
(3.176)
(3.177)
Table 3.11 shows typical hydraulic conductivity values for various rock types
and soils. Figure 3.41 shows the range of hydraulic conductivity and
permeability for various rock types and soils. Clearly, rocks and soils have a
wide range of permeability and hydraulic conductivity values.
Sometimes, it is easier to solve single phase flow problems in terms of
hydraulic head (piezometric head) rather than in terms of pressure. This is
especially true for inclined or vertical flow in which gravity plays a role.
Figure 3.42 shows the definition of the hydraulic head (piezometric head) for a
point O in an inclined porous medium located above a datum level at which z
is zero. The hydraulic head is given by
3-92
(3.178)
3-93
Eq.(3.178) is not a cartesian coordinate in the flow direction but rather the
elevation of the point P above or below a reference datum. In a sense, z is a
gravity head that reflects the potential energy of the fluid at O in the earths
gravitational field. The datum at which z = 0 is arbitrary and can be selected
anywhere in the system. If the point O is below the datum, then z is negative.
The pressure head is given by
P
g
3-94
(3.179)
and elevation
KA h
KA
dh
ds
(3.180)
h2 h1
s2 s1
KA
(3.181)
KA
h1 h2
s2 s1
KA
3-95
h
L
(3.182)
where
and L is the positive length of the porous medium between points 1 and 2 in
the flow direction. It should be observed that the elevations of points 1 and 2
(z1 and z2) do not appear explicitly in Eq.(3.182) although they do appear
implicitly in the hydraulic heads. However, Eq.(3.182) can be rewritten such
that z1 and z2 appear explicitly as follows. From Figure 3.43,
L cos
where
z1 z2
(3.183)
is the angle the porous medium makes with the vertical direction.
KA
h1 h2
cos
z1 z2
3-96
(3.184)
is zero, cos
is
h
L
KA
(3.185)
k g
(3.186)
KA
h
L
k g
h
L
(3.187)
KA
h
L
(3.188)
dh
dt
(3.189)
3-97
dh
dt
KA
h
aL
(3.190)
ho
(3.191)
Eq.(3.190) along with (3.191) can easily be solved to obtain the working
equation for the falling head permeameter as
3-98
ln
h
ho
KA
t
aL
k gA
t
aL
(3.192)
in consistent units.
v Dp
(3.193)
where
v = Darcy velocity, cm/s
Dp = mean grain diameter of the granular porous medium, cm
= fluid density, gm/cm3
= fluid viscosity, poise
Figure 3.45. Fanning friction factor factor for flow in porous media (Rose,
1945)
3-99
For laminar flow, in which Darcy's law is valid, the friction factor versus
Reynolds number is given by the line shown in Figure 3.45 having the
equation
1000
Re
(3.194)
It can seen in the figure that the experimental data begin to deviate from the
line at a Reynolds number of about 1.0. Thus, Darcy's law is valid for flow in
porous media for Reynolds number up to about 1. At Reynolds numbers
greater than 1, Darcy's law is no longer valid. Therefore, flow at Reynolds
number greater than 1 can be characterized as non-darcy flow.
Based on analogy with flow in pipes, the flow regimes for non-darcy flow
can be classified as shown in Figure 3.46 as transition flow for Reynolds
number in the range 1 to 100, and turbulent flow for Reynolds number
greater than 100.
3-100
dP
dx
v
k
v2
(3.195)
where the variables are in Darcy units. The first term on the right-side of
Eq.(3.195) gives the viscous component of the pressure gradient (Darcy flow)
whereas the second term gives the inertial-turbulent component of the
pressure gradient, which constitutes the non-darcy flow effect. Because the
non-darcy flow effect is most severe near the wellbore, this additional effect is
usually incorporated into the gas flow equation as a rate-dependent skin
factor. The velocity coefficient ( ) is a function of the permeability and porosity
of the porous medium and is independent of rate. Figure 3.47 shows a
correlation of the velocity coefficient with permeability from core analysis.
Consider radial steady state flow of a real gas from the reservoir into the
well. For this case, Eq.(3.195) can be written as
dP
dr
v
k
v2
(3.196)
2P
dP
Z
re
rw
2P v
dr
Z k
re
rw
2P
Z
v 2 dr
(3.197)
3-101
sc
Bg
(3.198)
standard conditions. For real gas flow, the gas formation volume factor is
given by
Bg
Psc ZT
Tsc P
3-102
(3.199)
q
2 rh
(3.200)
Psc qsc
Z scT
Pq
ZT
(3.201)
2P
dP
Z
Pwf
Po
qsc PscT
khTsc
2P
dP
Z
re
rw
qsc PscT
khTsc
dr
r
kqsc
2 h
re
sc
rw
dr
r2
(3.202)
qsc PscT
r
ln e
khTsc
rw
M Pw
qsc PscT
khTsc
kqsc
2 h
sc
1
rw
1
re
(3.203)
where M(P) is the real gas potential or real gas pseudo pressure. At field scale,
(1/re)
is
normally
negligibly
small
compared
to
(1/rw).
With
M Pwf
qsc PscT
r
ln e
khTsc
rw
qsc PscT
khTsc
kqsc
2 h
sc
1
rw
(3.204)
ln
re
rw
Dqsc
(3.205)
PD
M Pe M Pwf
qsc PscT
khTsc
3-103
(3.206)
this
k
hrw
(3.207)
sc
ln
re
rw
S*
Dqsc
(3.208)
qsc
khTsc
PscT
M Pe
r
ln e
rw
M Pwf
S
(3.209)
Dqsc
qsc
kh
1422T
M Pe
r
ln e
rw
M Pwf
S
(3.210)
Dqsc
It should be noted that the skin factor normally determined from well
test analysis is the total skin factor given by
S*
Dqsc
(3.211)
Therefore, the total skin factor determined from a gas well test should be
investigated further to determine the contribution of the non-darcy flow
component. The non-darcy flow component of the total skin factor cannot be
eliminated by well stimulation. It can be estimated by conducting drawdown
tests at two different flow rates.
3-104
It can be shown that the additional potential drop due to non-darcy flow
occurs mostly near the wellbore. This additional potential drop at any radius r
can be obtained from Eq.(3.203) as
M r
qsc PscT
khTsc
kqsc
2 h
sc
1
rw
1
r
(3.212)
At r =re,
M re
qsc PscT
khTsc
kqsc
2 h
sc
1
rw
(3.213)
rw
r
(3.214)
Eq.(3.214). It can be observed that 90% of the total non-darcy flow potential
drop occurs within r = 10rw. Thus, if rw is 0.3 ft, then 90% of the total nondarcy flow potential drop occurs within 3 ft of the well. This is the justification
for treating the non-darcy flow effect as a flow-dependent skin factor.
Table 3.12: Non-Darcy Potential Drop
r
rw
M (r )
M re
1
2
5
10
0
0.50
0.80
0.90
3-105
3-106
and arrow lengths have been used to indicate the directions and magnitudes
of the principal values of the permeability anisotropy, they should not be
misinterpreted as vectors. Permeability is a tensor, not a vector. The special
form of the permeability tensor shown in the figure is
k x, z
kx
kz
(3.215)
and not
kx
kz
k x, z
(3.216)
(3.217)
vx
vy
vz
k xx
k xy
k xz
k yx
k zx
k yy
k zy
k yz
k zz
(3.218)
z
The permeability tensor given by
k x, y , z
k xx
k xy
k xz
k yx
k zx
k yy
k zy
k yz
k zz
3-107
(3.219)
is a second rank tensor with nine elements. The tensor is symmetric and as
such kxy = kyx, kxx = kzx and kyz = kzy. The corresponding equations for 2D flow
are
vx
vy
1 k xx
k yx
k xy
k yy
(3.220)
and
k x, y
k xx
k yx
k xy
k yy
(3.221)
K. h
(3.222)
3-108
k u, v
ku
0
0
kv
0
0
kz
(3.223)
where u, v, w are the coordinates in the directions of the principal axes of the
anisotropy. When viewed in the coordinates of the principal axes of the
anisotropy, Darcy's law for homogeneous and anisotropic media in 3D
simplifies to
ku
vu
vv
vw
kv
(3.224)
kw
In this special coordinate system, the Darcy velocity vector and the velocity
potential gradient vector are collinear and the equation can be written as
vu i vv j vw w
ku
i kv
j kw
(3.225)
where i, j and w are unit vectors. The corresponding equations for 2D flow are
ku
0
k u, v
vx
vy
ku
0
kv
(3.226)
(3.227)
kv
and
vu i vv j
ku
i kv
3-109
(3.228)
Example 3.5
Steady state flow of a single phase liquid occurs in a horizontal, 2D,
homogeneous and anisotropic reservoir, which has a permeability tensor
given by
k(x,y)=
200 50 md
50 750
The pressure in the reservoir has been measured at three observations wells
whose coordinates are given in Table 3.13. The liquid viscosity is 1 cp. Do the
negative entries in the permeability tensor bother you?
Table 3.13: Data from Observation Wells
Observation
x Coordinate
y Coordinate
Pressure
Well
(ft)
(ft)
(psia)
2000
800
1800
800
1500
1. Calculate the magnitude (in ft/day) and the direction of the Darcy
velocity for the flow. Give the direction in terms of the angle the Darcy
velocity vector makes with the positive x- axis.
2. Sketch two vectors with one pointing in the flow direction and the other
pointing in the direction of the pressure gradient. What is the angle
between the two vectors in degrees?
3. Sketch the flow field and the pressure gradient field.
Solution to Example 3.5
Figure 3.49 shows the positions of the wells and their bottomhole pressures.
3-110
0.001127 5.615
(3.229)
. P
vx
0.001127 5.615
vy
P
x
1500 2000
800
5
8
psi/ft
P
y
1800 2000
800
1
4
psi/ft
3-111
k xx
k xy
k yx
k yy
P
x
P
y
(3.230)
5 1
i
j
8 4
0.625
0.625i 0.250 j
2
0.250
0.6731 psi/ft
0.625i 0.250 j .
cos
0.625
0.625
0.250
1 cos
0.9285
0.6252 0.2502
21.80
vx
vy
200
50
50 750
0.001127 5.615
1
vx
0.001127 5.615
200
5
8
50
vy
0.001127 5.615
50
5
8
750
5
8
1
4
1
4
0.7120 ft/D
1
4
0.9888 ft/D
v
v
0.7120i 0.9888 j
0.7120
0.9888
1.2185 ft/D
tan
0.9888
1.3888
0.7120
3-112
54.24
Figure 3.50 shows the magnitudes and the directions of the darcy velocity and
the pressure gradient vectors. The figure shows that the Darcy velocity and
pressure gradient vectors are not collinear for flow in the anisotropic porous
medium.
v . P cos
3-113
where
cos
0.6922
0.8202
0.8440
147.56
Figure 3.51 shows sketches of the flow field and the pressure gradient field.
Figure 3.51. Flow and pressure gradient fields for Example 3.5.
objective
is
to
derive
the
equations
for
transforming
the
v sin
(3.231)
v cos
(3.232)
u sin
x
y
cos
sin
sin
cos
u
v
(3.233)
u
v
cos
sin
sin
cos
x
y
3-115
(3.234)
vx
vy
1 k xx
k yx
k xy
k yy
(3.220)
The Darcy velocity in the uv coordinate system is related to the Darcy velocity
in the xy coordinate system by Eq.(3.234) as
3-116
vu
vv
cos
sin
vx
sin
cos
vy
(3.235)
vu
vv
cos
sin
k xx
k xy
sin
cos
k yx
k yy
(3.236)
The flow potential in the xy coordinate system is related to the flow potential
in the uv coordinate system by Eq.(2.233) as
cos
sin
sin
cos
(3.237)
vu
vv
cos
sin
k xx
k yx
sin
cos
k xy
k yy
cos
sin
sin
cos
(3.238)
v
Eq.(3.238) is Darcys law in the uv coordinate system and is of the form
vu
vv
1 kuu
kvu
kuv
kvv
(3.239)
v
A comparison of Eqs.(3.238) and (3.239) shows that the permeability tensor in
the uv coordinate system is related to the tensor in the xy coordinate system
as follows:
kuu
kuv
cos
sin
kvu
kvv
sin
cos
k xx
k yx
3-117
k xy
k yy
cos
sin
sin
cos
(3.240)
Carrying out the matrix multiplications on the right side of Eq.(3.240) and
equating the result to the left side matrix gives
kuu
k xx cos 2
kuv
k xx sin cos
k yx sin 2
k xy cos 2
k yy sin cos
(3.242)
kvu
k xx sin cos
k yx cos 2
k xy sin 2
k yy sin cos
(3.243)
k yx sin cos
k xx sin 2
kvv
k yy sin 2
k xy sin cos
k yx sin cos
k yy cos 2
k xy sin cos
(3.241)
(3.244)
From trigonometry,
cos 2
1
2
(1 cos 2 )
(3.245)
sin 2
1
2
(1 cos 2 )
(3.246)
sin cos
1
2
(3.247)
sin 2
kuu
1
2
(1 cos 2 )k xx
1
2
sin 2 k yx
1
2
sin 2 k xy
1
2
(1 cos 2 )k yy
(3.248)
kuu
k xx
k yy
2
k xx
k yy
2
cos 2
(3.249)
k xy sin 2
kuv
1
2
sin 2 k xx
1
2
(1 cos 2 )k yx
1
2
(1 cos 2 )k xy
1
2
sin 2 k yy
3-118
(3.250)
kuv
k xx
kvu
k yy
sin 2
k xy cos 2
(3.251)
kvv
1
2
(1 sin 2 )k xx
1
2
sin 2 k yx
1
2
sin 2 k xy
1
2
(1 cos 2 )k yy
(3.252)
k xx
k yy
k xx
k yy
cos 2
k xy sin 2
(3.253)
kuv
kvu
(3.254)
k yy
sin 2
k xy cos 2
(3.255)
Eq.(3.255) yields
2k xy
sin 2
cos 2
tan 2
k xx k yy
(3.256)
or
1
2
tan
2k xy
k xx
k yy
(3.257)
+90)
tan
10.3048
2
50
200 750
tan
0.1818
10.3048
5.15
ku
ku
kv
200 750
2
200 750
cos 10.3048
2
kv
50sin 10.3048
ku
0
0
kv
195.5
754.5
the permeability anisotropy. Figure 3.53 shows that the coordinate system
along the principal axes of the permeability anisotropy (u,v) makes an angle of
+5.15 with the x,y coordinate system.
3-120
Also shown in Figure 3.53 is the Darcy velocity vector in relation to the x,y
and the u,v coordinate systems, where the u,v coordinates are the principal
axes of the permeability anisotropy.
The components of the Darcy velocity in the u,v coordinates can be
calculated as follows.
vu
1.2185cos(54.24
0.7980 ft/D
vv
1.2185sin 54.24
5.15
0.9209 ft/D
1.2185sin 49.09
The components of the Darcy velocity in the u,v coordinates also can be
calculated from Eq.(3.234) as
3-121
vu
vv
cos 5.15
sin 5.15
0.7120
sin 5.15
cos 5.15
0.9888
vu
0.7980 ft/D
vv
0.9209 ft/D
0.7120
cos 5.15
sin 5.15
0.9888
sin 5.15
0.7980
cos 5.15
0.9209
These are the results obtained previously. It should be noted that because the
flow is invariant with a rotation of the axes, the magnitude of the Darcy
velocity (1.2185 ft/D) remains the same in the new coordinate system. The
direction of the Darcy velocity also remains the same. Only the components of
the Darcy velocity change in the new coordinate system.
3.14.4 Alternative Calculation of the Principal Values and the Principal
Axes of the Permeability Anisotropy
From linear algebra, the principal values of the permeability tensor are
given by the eigenvalues of the permeability tensor whereas the principal axes
of the permeability anisotropy are given by the eigenvectors of the
permeability tensor. This can be demonstrated by reworking Example 3.6 as
an eigenvalue problem.
Example 3.7
Rework Example 3.6 by calculating the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the
permeability tensor.
det
200
50
200
50
750
750
0
50
50
3-122
950
147500 0
950
9502
4 1 147500
950 559.0170
2
2
1
195.5md
754.5md
These principal values are the same as obtained in Example 3.6. For
1
equations:
200 195.5
50
50
750 195.5
x
y
4.5085
50
50
554.5085
4.5085 x 50 y
50 x 554.5085 y
x
y
11.0902
1
0
0
The eigenvector is
11.0902
1
tan
1
11.0902
0.0902
5.15
3-123
For
754.5 ,
the
eigenvector
is
obtained
by
solving
the
following
simultaneous equations:
200 754.5
50
50
750 754.5
554.5
50
50
4.5
x
y
554.5 x 50 y
50 x 4.5 y
x
y
x
y
0
0
0
0
0.0902
y
1
The eigenvector is
0.0902
1
11.0902
0.0902
1 0
3-124
kdf
kdp
(3.258)
Figure 3.54. Collinear relationship between the direction of flow and the
direction of the velocity potential gradient for an isotropic medium.
For an anisotropic medium, in general, the Darcy velocity vector and
the velocity potential gradient vector are not collinear as shown in Figure
3.55. The concept of directional permeability seeks to extend the definition of
permeability of an isotropic medium expressed in Eq.(3.258) to an anisotropic
medium. Accordingly, the directional permeability in the direction of flow is
defined in Darcy units by the equation
kdf
where
cos
v
cos
(3.259)
3-125
v cos
kdp
where v cos
(3.260)
Figure 3.55. Relationship between the direction of flow and the direction of
the velocity potential gradient in an anisotropic porous medium.
Example 3.8
Calculate the directional permeabilities for the flow field of Example 3.5.
Solution to Example 3.8
The directional permeability in the direction of flow is calculated with
Eq.(3.259) in oilfield units as
kdf
v
(0.001127(5.615)
cos
1 1.2185
147.56
3-126
338.96 md
kdp
v cos
(0.001127(5.615)
1 1.2185 cos 180
147.56
(0.001127(5.615) 0.6731
241.46 md
3.56. The permeability tensor for this medium in the x,y coordinate system is
k x, y
kx
ky
(3.261)
Figure 3.56. Darcy velocity vector in the flow direction that makes an
angle with the positive x axis.
3-127
kx
vx
(3.262)
x
ky
vy
(3.263)
y
kdf
vs
(3.264)
where s is the flow direction. Figure 3.56 shows the relationships between the
Darcy velocity in the flow direction vs and its x and y components vx and vy.
From Figure 3.56, we find
vx
vs cos
(3.265)
vy
vs sin
(3.266)
Eqs. (3.362) and (3.263) give the potential gradients in the x and y directions
as
Because
kx
ky
vs cos
(3.267)
vs sin
(3.268)
dx
x ds
dy
x ds
(3.269)
dx
ds
cos
3-128
(3.270)
dy
ds
(3.271)
sin
cos 2
kx
1
kdf
sin 2
ky
(3.272)
Given the principal values of the permeability anisotropy (kx, ky) and the
principal coordinate system (x,y), Eq.(3.272) can be used to calculate the
directional permeability in the flow direction that makes an angle
with the
positive x-axis.
Eq.(3.272) can be put in rectangular coordinates by choosing a vector r
in the s direction (flow direction) and noting that
x
r cos
(3.273)
r sin
(3.274)
cos 2
x2
r2
(3.275)
sin 2
y2
r2
(3.276)
r2
kdf
x2
kx
y2
ky
x2
kx
y2
ky
3-129
(3.277)
or
x2
kx
y2
2
ky
(3.279)
k x and
x2
kx
with semiaxes
k x , k y and
y2
2
ky
z2
2
kz .
3-130
kz
(3.280)
with the
cos 2
1
kx
1
1
kdp
sin 2
(3.281)
1
ky
x2
1
kx
y2
(3.282)
1
ky
or
x2
1
kx
with semiaxes 1/ k x
y2
2
(3.283)
1
ky
x2
1
kx
with semiaxes 1/ k x , 1/ k x
y2
2
y2
2
1
ky
1
kz
(3.284)
and 1/ k z .
k and
1
k
3-132
3-133
3-134
Example 3.9
Calculate and plot the permeability ellipses for the flow field of Example 3.5.
Solution to Example 3.9
The permeability ellipses are given by Eqs.(3.279) for the flow direction and
(3.283) for the potential gradient direction, where x and y are the principal
axes of the permeability anisotropy. These equations can be adapted for our
purpose as follows:
1
u2
ku
v2
2
kv
u2
2
v2
195.5
754.5
and
1
u2
1
ku
v2
2
1
kv
u2
2
1
195.5
v2
2
1
754.5
3-135
3-136
Pq
1 1
b
2 PL 1
P
G
P
3-137
(3.285)
P1 P2
,
2
is equal to
. Figure 3.64
3-139
3-141
2
PI H
FD
L
ln
h
kL
B
L
2re
(3.286)
L
2re
ln
h
2 rw
where
PIH
FD
oil viscosity
formation thickness
rw
wellbore radius
re
Figure 3.66 shows the flow geometry. The horizontal well of length L is located
half-way between the top and the bottom of the reservoir of thickness h. L is
assumed to be small relative to 2re. The units conversion constant, FD, is
given in Table 3.14.
3-142
Figure 3.66: Flow geometry for steady state productivity index equation.
SI Units
Oilfield
Units
Field
Metric
Units
cm
ft
L2
cm2
m2
ft2
m2
Pressure
ML-1T-2
atm
Pa
psi
MPa
Permeability
L2
darcy
m2
millidarcy
(md)
m2
Fluid
Viscosity
ML-1T-1
cp
Pa.s
cp
mPa.s
Liquid Flow
Rate
L3T-1
cm3/s
m3/s
B/D
m3/D
0.001127
86.4
Dimension
Darcy
Units
Distance
Area
FD
3-143
kh
B
2
PIV
FD
(3.287)
r
ln e
rw
PI H
PIV
ln
FD
L
ln
h
re
rw
L
2re
(3.288)
L
2re
ln
h
2 rw
Note that because the right side of Eq.(3.288) involves ratios of lengths,
Eq.(3.288) is valid in any system of units.
Example 3.10
Given the following data for an isotropic reservoir, calculate (a) the
productivity index for a horizontal well, (b) the productivity index for a vertical
well, and (c) the ratio of the productivity indices of the horizontal and the
vertical wells.
Length of horizontal well (L)
500 m
40 m
1000 m
0.12 m
400 md
400 md
3-144
Oil viscosity ( o)
5 cp
1.2 RB/STB
2
PI H
0.001127
500
ln
40
500
1
2 x1000
500
2 x1000
26.02 STB/D/psi
ln
40
2 x0.12
Substituting the numerical values into Eq.(3.287) gives the productivity index
for the vertical well as
400 x 40 x3.2808
5 x1.2
1000
ln
0.12
2
PIV
0.001127
6.86 STB/D/psi
PI H
PIV
26.02
6.86
3.8
petroleum
reservoirs
are
anisotropic
and
have
different
vertical
permeability
is
usually
much
less
than
the
horizontal
an
anisotropic
reservoir
with
horizontal
and
vertical
permeabilities kH and kV, respectively. These are the principal values of the
permeability anisotropy and x and z are the principal axes of the anisotropy.
The diffusivity equation for steady state single phase flow for the anisotropic
medium is given by
kH
P
x2
kV
P
z2
(3.289)
k*
k H kV
(3.290)
k*
kH
(3.291)
k*
z
kV
(3.292)
and
k*
P
X2
P
Z2
3-146
(3.293)
P
X2
P
Z2
(3.294)
500 m
40 m
1000 m
0.12 m
400 md
25 md
Oil viscosity ( o)
5 cp
1.2 RB/STB
k*
400 x 25 100 md
From Eq.(3.291),
L*
500
100
400
250 m
3-147
re* 1000
100
400
500 m
From Eq.(3.292),
h*
40
100
25
80 m
2
PI H
0.001127
250
ln
80
250
2 x500
250
2 x500
8.71 STB/D/psi
ln
80
2 x0.12
The productivity index for the vertical well in the anisotropic reservoir is given
by Eq.(3.287) with k = kH. Thus, for the vertical well,
2
PIV
0.001127
400 x 40 x3.2808
5 x1.2
1000
ln
0.12
6.86 STB/D/psi
The ratio of the horizontal to the vertical well productivity indices in the
anisotropic medium is
PI H
PIV
8.71
1.27
6.86
3-148
Example 3.12
A horizontal well has intersected a large number of vertical fractures as
shown in Figure 3.67 such that the vertical permeability is larger than the
horizontal permeability. Given the following data for this anisotropic reservoir,
calculate (a) the productivity index for a horizontal well, (b) the productivity
index for a vertical well, and (c) the ratio of the productivity indices of the
horizontal and the vertical wells.
Length of horizontal well (L)
500 m
40 m
1000 m
0.12 m
400 md
Oil viscosity ( o)
5 cp
3-149
1.2 RB/STB
k*
400 x800
565.69 md
From Eq.(3.291),
L*
565.69
400
500
re* 1000
594.60 m
565.69
400
1189.21 m
From Eq.(3.292),
h*
40
565.69
800
33.64 m
3-150
2
PI H
0.001127
594.60
ln
33.64
594.60
2 x1189.21
250
2 x1189.21
32.34 STB/D/psi
ln
33.64
2 x0.12
The productivity index for the vertical well in the anisotropic reservoir is given
by Eq.(3.286) with k = kH. Thus, for the vertical well,
2
PIV
0.001127
400 x 40 x3.2808
5 x1.2
1000
ln
0.12
6.86 STB/D/psi
The ratio of the horizontal to the vertical well productivity indices in the
anisotropic medium with vertical fractures is
PI H
PIV
32.34
6.86
4.71
3-151
2
PI F
FD
L
ln
h
kH L
B
L
2re
(3.295)
L
2re
where L is the total length of the fracture. The assumptions underlying the
above equation are:
Fracture height is equal to the reservoir pay thickness
The fracture is plane and is centered on the well
The well drainage radius is large compared to the fracture length
The fracture has infinite conductivity
The fracture conductivity is defined as
FC
kf w
(3.296)
3-152
FCD
kf w
kH L f
(3.297)
L
. A hydraulic fracture behaves as if it
2
FCD
300
3-153
(3.298)
If
L
2re
kH h
B
4re
ln
L
2
PIV
FD
(3.299)
L
4
rw
(3.300)
The ratio of the productivity index of the fracture well to the unfractured well
is given by
PI F
PIV
ln
FD
L
ln
h
re
rw
L
2re
(3.301)
L
2re
h
2 rw
The
in
NOMENCLATURE
A
Ai =
Area of bed i
AT =
total area
core diameter
Bg =
cf
ct
total compressibility
CD =
non-Darcy coefficient
Dp =
Ei =
f( ) =
FC =
fracture conductivity
FCD=
gravitational acceleration
hi =
thickness of bed i
hydraulic conductivity
kdf =
kdp =
ki =
permeability of bed i
kij =
kg =
kL =
kor =
ko =
Kozeny constant
length
Li =
length of bed i
Le =
ln =
log =
log to base 10
M =
pressure
PD =
dimensionless pressure
PD' =
Pi
P* =
Psc =
reference pressure
Pe =
Pw =
PwD=
PwD =
'
PwD
=
Pwf =
Pws =
P1 =
inlet pressure
P2 =
outlet pressure
mean pressure
P1 P2
2
dP
=
ds
pressure gradient
PI =
productivity index
PIH =
PIV =
volumetric flowrate
qsf =
sandface rate
qsc =
qT =
rD =
dimensionless radius
re =
rH =
hydraulic radius
ri
radius of bed i
rinv =
ro
rw =
resistance of water
rw =
wellbore radius
Re =
Reynolds Number
Ro =
Rw =
resistivity of water
skin factor
storativity
Sp =
Ss =
time
tD =
dimensionless time
tp
absolute temperature
transmissibility
Tsc =
=
reference temperature
flux vector, Darcy velocity vector
fracture width
gas Z-factor
fluid density.
viscosity
porosity, fraction
tortuosity
pressure head
gradient operator
P =
pressure change
P' =
t =
shut-in time
te =
h =
L =
REFEREENCES
Amyx, J.W., Bass, D.M., Jr. and Whiting, R.L. : Petroleum Reservoir
Engineering, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1960.
Anderson, G. : Coring and Core Analysis Handbook, Petroleum Publishing
Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1975.
Archer, J.S. and Wall, C.G. : Petroleum Engineering, Graham & Trotman,
London, England, 1986.
Archie, G.E. :The Electrical Resistivity Log as an Aid in Determining Some
Reservoir Characteristics, Trans. AIME (1942) 146, 54-62.
Archie, G.E. :Introduction to Petrophysics of Reservoir Rocks, AAPG Bull.,
Vol. 34, No. 5 (May 1950) 943-961.
Babu, D.K. and Odeh, A.S. : "Productivity of a Horizontal Well," SPE Reservoir
Engineering (November, 1989) 417-421.
Bear, J. : Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, Elsevier, New York, 1972.
Berg, R.R. : Method for Determining Permeability from Reservoir Rocks,
Trans., Gulf Coast Assoc. of Geol. Soc., Vol. XX (1970) 303-335.
Bradley, H.B. (Editor-in-Chief) : Petroleum Engineering Handbook, SPE,
Richardson, Texas, 1987.
Butler, R.M. : Horizontal Wells for the Recovery of Oil, Gas and Bitumen,
Petroleum Society, Canadian Inst. Min., Met. and Pet., Calgary, 1994.
Carslaw, H.S. and Jaeger, J.C. : Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd edition,
Clarendon Press, Oxford (1959).
Carman, P.C. : "Fluid Flow Through A Granular Bed, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng.
London (1937) 15, 150-156.
Carman, P.C. : "Determination of the Specific Surface of Powders, J. Soc.
Chem. Indus (1938) 57, 225-234.
Carpenter, C.B. and Spencer, G.B. : Measurements of the Compressibility of
Consolidated Oil-Bearing Sandstones, RI 3540, USBM (Oct. 1940).
Chilingar, G.V.: Relationship Between Porosity, Permeability and Grain Size
Distribution of Sands and Sandstones, Proceedings of the Sixth
International Sedimentological Congress, The Netherlands and Belgium,
3-159
1963, Deltaic and Shallow Marine Deposits, L.M.J.U van Straatan, Ed.,
Elsevier, New York, 72 75.
Clarke, R.H. :"Reservoir Properties of Conglomerates and Conglomeratic
Sandstones," AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 63 (1979) 799-809.
Collins, R.E. : Flow of Fluids Through Porous Materials, Van Nostrand
Reinhold Company, 1961. Reprinted by the Petroleum Publishing
Company, 1976. Reprinted by Research & Engineering Consultants
Inc., 1990.
Core Laboratories Inc. : Special Core Analysis, 1976.
Corey, A.T. : Mechanics of Heterogeneous Fluids in Porous Media, Water
Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1977.
Cosse, R. : Basics of Reservoir Engineering, Editions Technip, Paris, 1993.
De Boodt, M.F. and Kirkham, D. : "Anisotropy and Measurement of Air
Permeability of Soil Clods," Soil Sci., Vol. 76 (1953) 127-313.
Dobrynin, V.M. : "The Effect of Overburden Pressure on Some Properties of
Sandstones, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (Dec. 1962) 360-366.
Dullien, F.A.L. : Porous Media - Fluid Transport and Pore Structure, Academic
Press, New York, 1979.
Firoozabadi, A. and Katz, D.L. : "An Aanlysis of High Velocity Gas Flow
Through Porous Media," JPT (Feb. 1979) 221.
Freeze, R.A. and Cherry, J.A. : Goundwater, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
1979.
Giger, F.M., Reiss, L.H. and Jourdan, A.P. : "The Reservoir Engineering
Aspects of Horizontal Wells," paper SPE 13024, presented at the 59th
SPE Annual Technical Meeting, Dallas, Texas, September 16-19, 1984.
Gilman, J.R. and Jargon, J.R. : "Evaluating Horizontal Versus Vertical Well
Performance," World Oil (April, 1992) 67-72.
Gilman, J.R. and Jargon, J.R. : "Evaluating Horizontal Versus Vertical Well
Performance: Part 2," World Oil (June, 1992) 55-60.
Goode, P.A. and Kuchuk, F.J. : "Inflow Performance for Horizontal Wells," SPE
Reservoir Engineering (August, 1991) 319-323.
Hutta, J.J. and Griffiths, : "Directional Permeability of Sandstones: A Test
Technique," Producers Monthly, Nov. 26, Vol.34 and Oct.24, Vol. 31,
1955.
Jennings, H.J. : How to Handle and Process Soft and Unconsolidated Cores,
World Oil (June 1965) 116-119.
3-160
3-161
3-162
CHAPTER 4
HETEROGENEITY
4.1 INTRODUCTION
Petroleum reservoir rocks are, in general, heterogeneous and very
often anisotropic in nature. This means that the petrophysical properties
of interest such as permeability, porosity, fluid saturation, lithology and
others
vary
in
space
both
vertically
and
laterally.
Evidence
of
42
,...,
1
N
(4.1)
i
i 1
Geometric Mean
The geometric mean is a better measure of central tendency for
data from a log normal distribution than the arithmetic mean. The
geometric mean is defined as
ln
geom
1
N
i N
ln
(4.2)
i 1
geom
...
(4.3)
Median
The median of a sample data set is found by determining that
value of
median
( N 1) / 2
(4.4)
for N odd
If N is even, then the mean of the two most central values is used to
calculate the median as
1
2
median
N /2
for N even
N /2 1
(4.5)
Mode
The mode of a probability distribution p
is the value of
at
Var
...
i N
N 1i
(4.6)
The standard deviation is the positive square root of the variance and is
given by
44
...
Var
...
(4.7)
Note
% 50
The Dykstra-Parsons
k50 k84.1
k50
(4.8)
4-5
standard deviation from the mean. For the data of Table 4.1 and Figure
4.1,
N+1 = 20
k50 = 17.8 md
k84.1 = 6.1 md
k50 k84.1
k50
17.8 6.1
0.66
17.8
No of Samples >= k
% >= k
1
2
3
4
5
5
10
15
20
25
35
9
10
45
50
12
13
14
60
65
70
16
17
18
19
80
85
90
95
46
variation
that
approaches
whereas
an
extremely
Figure 4.2
4-7
Lorenz Coefficient
Another measure of heterogeneity used in the petroleum industry
is the Lorenz coefficient . The Lorenz coefficient of variation is obtained
by plotting a graph of cumulative kh versus cumulative h, sometimes
called a flow capacity plot.
Lorenz Coefficient
48
area ABCA
area ADCA
(4.9)
where ABCA is the cross-hatched area in the figure and ADCA is the
triangle below the cross-hatched area. From Figure 4.2, the Lorenz
coefficient of the data of Table 4.2 is about 0.65.
The Lorenz coefficient of variation also varies from 0 to 1.
Unfortunately, the Lorenz coefficient is not a unique measure of reservoir
heterogeneity. Several different permeability distributions can give the
same
value
of
Lorenz
coefficient.
For
log-normal
permeability
distribtutions, the Lorenz coefficient is very similar to the DykstraParsons coefficient of permeability variation.
Table 4.2 . Calculation of Lorenz Coefficient of Variation
h
kh
kh
kh/Sumk
(ft)
(ft)
h/Sum h
h
(ft)
(md)
(fraction)
(md-ft)
(md-ft)
0.000
8.1
2.0
4388
2640
0.22
0.22
35542.
35542.
5280.0
40822.
0.000
0.399
1.782
1.782
0.062
0.459
0.440
2.222
0.078
0.564
0.777
2.999
0.105
0.653
1.000
3.999
0.140
0.695
0.800
4.799
0.168
0.766
1.824
6.623
0.232
0.798
1.280
7.903
0.277
0.810
0.432
8.335
0.292
8
3.7
2543
0.21
9409.1
50231.
9
5.0
1579
0.20
7895.0
58126.
9
4.0
930
0.20
3720.0
61846.
9
9.6
662
0.19
6355.2
68202.
1
6.4
441
0.20
2822.4
71024.
5
2.7
402
0.16
1085.4
72109.
9
4-9
5.6
401
0.20
2245.6
74355.
0.836
1.120
9.455
0.331
0.870
1.440
10.895
0.381
0.882
0.840
11.735
0.411
0.924
3.171
14.906
0.522
0.940
1.003
15.909
0.557
0.948
0.616
16.525
0.578
0.964
1.258
17.783
0.622
0.978
1.840
19.623
0.687
0.987
1.444
21.067
0.737
0.992
1.919
22.986
0.804
0.995
1.728
24.714
0.865
0.997
0.595
25.309
0.886
0.998
1.056
26.365
0.923
1.000
2.212
28.577
1.000
Sum h =
28.577
5
8.0
378
0.18
3024.0
77379.
5
4.0
267
0.21
1068.0
78447.
5
15.1
250
0.21
3775.0
82222.
5
5.9
249
0.17
1469.1
83691.
6
2.8
232
0.22
649.6
84341.
2
7.4
200
0.17
1480.0
85821.
2
9.2
136
0.20
1251.2
87072.
4
7.6
98
0.19
744.8
87817.
2
10.1
47
0.19
474.7
88291.
9
9.6
30
0.18
288.0
88579.
9
3.5
28
0.17
98.0
88677.
9
6.6
16
0.16
105.6
88783.
5
15.8
13
0.14
205.4
88988.
9
Sumkh =
88988.
9
410
While
the
Dykstra-Parsons
and
Lorenz
coefficients
give
is 5.0,
the variance is 6.67 and the standard deviation is 2.58. Thus, by the
usual measure of ordinary statistics, the degree of heterogeneity of the
two reservoirs is the same. Yet, there is something about the two
reservoirs that leads one to conclude that A is more heterogeneous than
B. It is the spatial arrangement of the values of the property relative to
each that leads one to conclude that A is more heterogeneous than B. In
reservoir A, the property appears to be randomly distributed in space
whereas in reservoir B, it is distributed in an orderly and continuous
fashion. Thus, to fully characterize heterogeneity, the spatial correlation
structure of the property must be taken into account.
Three related functions are normally used to characterize the
spatial continuity of the data from a heterogeneous reservoir. These are
(1) the variogram (semi-variogram), (2) the covariance function and (3)
the correlation coefficient function.
412
4.3.1. Variogram
Definition
The variogram is a function obtained by plotting the semivariance
of the differences between the properties at two locations separated by a
distance h versus h. The variogram is defined as
Var
x h
2
x h
(4.10)
2Nh
where
semivariance
lag distance
x h =
Nh
of
x h
value of
x h
by
2,
where
the
mean
of
is the semivariance of
the function
divided
is the
x h
or the range of influence, and the value of the variogram at this point is
called the sill. The sill is the semivariance of the entire data set. Thus,
hidden in the variogram are the variance and standard deviation of the
data set, the usual measures of heterogeneity of ordinary statistics. If the
correlation length is zero, the spatial distribution of the property is fully
random. With increasing correlation length, the range of influence of one
value on its neighbors increases up to the correlation length. At lag
distances beyond the correlation length, the data are no longer
correlated.
The variogram and correlation length are directional quantities
(anisotropy again), and in general, will be different in different directions.
4-15
416
,...,
10
and
distance as shown in Table 4.3. Using the entries in the table, the
semivariances can easily be calculated with Eq.(4.10). In fact, the
semivariance for h = 0 can be obtained by inspection as (0) = 0. The
4-17
(x) and
Sample Data
h=0
h= x
h=2 x
h=3 x
h=4 x
h=5 x
Nh = 10
Nh = 9
Nh = 8
Nh = 7
Nh = 6
Nh = 5
(x
)
(x
(x+h)
(x
(x+h)
(x
(x+h)
(x+h)
(x)
(x+h)
(x)
(x+h)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
2.
418
3.
NC2
N!
N 2 !2!
C2
N N 1
2
(4.11)
For 10 data points, there will be 45 data pairs. The first task is to
compute and store the lag distances, hij, and the corresponding
2
i
values of
follows:
1.
2.
x2
x1 ,
x1 ,
2
2
x3
...
2
x10
x1 ,
10
2
4-19
Eliminate
4.
420
x3
x2 ,
x2 ,
2
2
x4
...
2
x10
10
x2 ,
5.
Eliminate
6.
x10
7.
10
x9 ,
xi
8.
1
n
2
i
n
versus
1
n
hij
n
4-21
422
4.
12
15
trend
15
1 x:
14
13
12
This data set is presented in Figure 4.9. This trend or drift should
be subtracted from the data before the variogram is computed.
Figure 4.10 compares the variograms for reservoir C with and
without the underlying trend or drift. The variogram with the drift
is an ever increasing function of h because of the underlying trend
and will never reach the sill, whereas after removing the drift, the
resulting variogram is lower and reaches the sill at h = 4 km. This
is the true experimental variogram for reservoir C. In this example,
after subtracting the drift, the resulting distribution is the same as
in reservoir B. Thus, the true variogram for reservoir C is the same
as for reservoir B.
5.
4-23
Figure 4.10. Variograms for reservoir C with and without the underlying
trend or drift.
424
Porosit
Permeabilit
(ft)
(%)
(md)
20
93
16.3
18
9.7
8.4
16.2
21
14.9
10
12.7
1.7
5.5
25
5.8
17
10
6.5
4.8
11
4.7
22
12
7.3
5.6
Depth
6.
4-25
7.
Unless you are already familiar with the variogram, you may not
see what it has to do with spatial correlation of the data. We can
see that the entries in Table 4.3 have a lot to do with spatial
correlation by plotting the scatter diagrams of
for each value of h. For h = 0,
(x+h) and
(x+h) versus
(x)
correlated and the data will follow the 45 line on the scatter plot
as shown in Figure 4.12. As h increases, the cloud of data points
scattered about the 45 line increases, indicating less and less
correlation between
(x+h) and
4.14.
426
(x+h) versus
B.
(x+h) versus
B.
4-27
(x+h) versus
B.
(x+h) versus
derive the physical meaning of the variogram. Consider the scatter plot
shown in Figure 4.15. The distance d from a datum point to the 45 line
is given by
x cos 45
x h
x h
cos 45
x h
(4.12)
2
x h
428
x
2
(4.13)
E d2
x h
x h
2Nh
(4.14)
Thus, the variogram is the mean of d2 about the 45 line at each lag
distance as a function of the lag distance h.
Variogram Models
The variogram is a means to an end not an end in itself. The
variogram is used to quantify the correlation structure of the variable of
interest for the purpose of estimation and conditional simulation. The
variogram of the sample data is known as the experimental variogram.
After computing the experimental variogram, a smooth theoretical
4-29
3 h
C
2 a
Co
Co C for h
1 h
2 a3
for h
(4.15)
Co C 1 e
430
(4.16)
4-31
3.
Co C 1 e
(4.17)
432
4.
Co
(4.18)
mh
Co
mh
4-33
for 0
(4.19)
does not have a sill. Figure 4.19 compares the linear model to the
generalized linear model.
Figure 4.19. The linear model and the generalized linear model.
5.
Co for h
(4.20)
6.
Co C 1
sin h / a
h/a
(4.21)
4-35
permeability
rather
than
the
permeability
itself.
Such
Depth
Uncorrecte
Correcte
lnk
lnk
2.5
0.916
59
6
(h)
(h)
h (ft)
With Drift
Without Drift
-3.812
0.000
0.000
4.078
-0.688
0.038
0.362
221
5.398
0.596
0.049
0.488
211
5.352
0.512
0.051
0.468
275
5.617
0.740
0.057
0.618
384
5.951
1.037
0.057
0.591
108
4.682
-0.269
0.050
0.545
XCoord
4807.
5
4808.
5
4809.
5
4810.
5
4811.
5
4812.
5
4813.
4-37
5
4814.
147
4.990
0.002
0.054
0.574
290
5.670
0.644
0.061
0.630
170
5.136
0.073
0.060
0.623
10
278
5.628
0.528
10
0.065
0.632
11
238
5.472
0.335
11
0.065
0.641
12
167
5.118
-0.057
12
0.068
0.728
13
304
5.717
0.505
13
0.075
0.780
14
98
4.585
-0.664
14
0.064
0.605
15
191
5.252
-0.034
15
0.074
0.684
16
266
5.583
0.260
16
0.077
0.628
17
40
3.689
-1.672
17
0.057
0.485
18
260
5.561
0.163
18
0.084
0.632
19
179
5.187
-0.248
19
0.086
0.642
20
312
5.743
0.271
20
0.097
0.720
21
272
5.606
0.097
21
0.098
0.655
22
395
5.979
0.432
22
0.105
0.769
23
405
6.004
0.420
23
0.115
0.787
5
4815.
5
4816.
5
4817.
5
4818.
5
4819.
5
4820.
5
4821.
5
4822.
5
4823.
5
4824.
5
4825.
5
4826.
5
4827.
5
4828.
5
4829.
5
4830.
438
5
4831.
24
275
5.617
-0.004
24
0.109
0.701
25
852
6.748
1.089
25
0.135
0.946
26
610
6.413
0.718
26
0.136
0.830
27
406
6.006
0.274
27
0.132
0.880
28
535
6.282
0.513
28
0.149
0.965
29
663
6.497
0.690
29
0.164
1.170
30
597
6.392
0.548
31
434
6.073
0.192
32
339
5.826
-0.092
33
216
5.375
-0.580
34
332
5.805
-0.188
35
295
5.687
-0.343
36
882
6.782
0.715
37
600
6.397
0.292
38
407
6.009
-0.133
40
479
6.172
-0.044
5
4832.
5
4833.
5
4834.
5
4835.
5
4836.
5
4837.
5
4838.
5
4839.
5
4840.
5
4841.
5
4842.
5
4843.
5
4844.
5
4845.
5
4847.
5
4-39
4848.
41
42
139
4.934
-1.356
43
135
4.905
-1.422
44
5
4849.
5
4850.
5
4851.
5
Figure 4.22 shows the experimental variogram for the natural log of
permeability, lnk. The graph is the plot of the data in columns 6 and 7 of
Table 4.5. The ever increasing nature of the variogram indicates an
underlying trend or drift in the permeability data. Before addressing the
problem of the underlying trend, let us fit a theoretical model to the
experimental variogram to demonstrate the procedure.
Figure 4.23 shows the fitted theoretical model from trial and error.
The nested model is
3 h
0.027 0.025
2 3
1 h
2 33
0.000101h 2
4-41
Let us now deal with the underlying trend in the permeability data.
Figure 4.24 shows a scatter plot of the log permeability data versus
relative depth together with the regression line. Clearly, there is an
underlying trend or drift in the permeability data. The trend line is
ln k
0.0372 x 4.7281
where x is the relative depth. This trend was subtracted from the lnk
data to obtain the corrected lnk data shown in column 5 of Table 4.5.
442
Figure 4.25 shows the scatter plot for the corrected permeability data
together with the regression line. Clearly, the underlying trend has been
removed.
Figure 4.26 shows the experimental variogram and the theoretical
model fit after the drift has been removed. The experimental variogram is
the graph of the data in columns 6 and 8 of Table 4.5. We see that after
removing the underlying trend, the experimental variogram can be fitted
with a spherical model of the form
3 h
0.31 0.35
2 9
1 h
.
2 93
Figure 4.25. Permeability data after the drift has been removed.
4-43
The true variogram of the natural log of permeability has a nugget effect
of 0.31, a sill of 0.66 and a correlation length of 9 ft.
Variogram Anisotropy
Variograms computed in different directions can show anisotropy.
Figure 4.27 shows two such anisotropies. In Figure 4.27a, the sills of the
variograms in the two directions are the same but the correlations
lengths are different. In Figure 4.27b, the slopes of the variograms in the
two directions are different. We can compute the correlation lengths or
the slopes of the variograms in different directions and plot them as
444
1(h)
is the variogram in
2
1
a1
a2
h22
(4.22)
2
1
slope1
slope2
h22
4-45
(4.23)
by
h12 h22
446
h32
h3
(4.24)
4-47
characteristic.
This
is
caused
by
the
longitudinal
448
4-49
450
4-51
452
C h
x h
x h
(4.25)
Nh 1
The
covariance
function
relationship between
2.
gives
(x) and
the
strength
of
the
linear
(x+h).
4-53
3.
dimensionless
covariance
function
known
as
correlation
The table of data used to calculate the variogram can also be used
to calculate the covariance function. The algorithm for computing
the covariance function for unequally spaced data is similar to that
for computing the variogram. In this case, three one-dimensional
arrays should be used to store hij,
and
visited.
5.
C 0
(4.26)
C h
where C(0) is the covariance at a zero lag distance and is equal the
variance of the data, s2. The fact that C(0) is the variance of the
data set is apparent from the entries in Table 4.3 for h = 0. The
variance of the data is given by
x
C 0
N 1
x
N 1
s2
(4.27)
Thus, like the variogram, the covariance function also has hidden
in it the usual measure of variability by ordinary statistics.
454
4-55
456
(x) and
(x+h) about their respective means. Figure 4.39 shows the scatter plot
for the covariation of
x h
x h
versus
at a fixed
lag distance h. The sum of the shaded areas divided by (Nh-1) is the
covariance function at that lag distance. Because the areas can be
positive or negative depending on which quadrant the scatter plot data
fall in, the covariance can be positive or negative. If the scatter plots are
concentrated along the axis AB in Figure 4.40, then all the areas will be
positive and the covariance will show a strong positive correlation. If the
scatter plots are concentrated along the axis CD, then all the areas are
negative and the covariance will show a strong negative correlation.
4-57
458
Figure 4.41 shows the scatter plot of the covariation for reservoir A at a
lag distance of 1 unit. The data are concentrated in the quadrants in
which all the areas are negative. Therefore, the covariance function will
be negative at this lag distance as can be confirmed in Figure 4.36 or
4.37.
4-59
ki
C k,
k
N 1
(4.28)
460
where s
C h
s xs x
deviation of
(4.29)
h
x and s
x h
is the standard
x h .
(x) and
(x+h).
2.
4-61
3.
4.
(x+h).
If
(x+h) or high
(x) are
with low
5.
(x) and
(x+h) or high
(x) and
(x) and
C k,
sk s
k,
(4.30)
properties.
Based
on
462
core
analyses
and
field
P x
x
2
1
exp
2
for
is the mean,
(4.31)
= 5 and
symmetric about the mean. For this distribution, all the measures of the
central tendency of the distribution (mean, median and mode) have the
same numerical value. Note that the distribution extends from
to
(4.32)
P z
1
exp
2
z2
2
4-63
for
(4.33)
= 0 and
= 5 and
= 4.
of standard deviation. Also shown are the areas under the curve for
certain ranges of the horizontal axis. For example, about 68% of the data
are contained within one standard deviation below and above the mean.
Thus, for a normal distribution, the following are true
0.6826
P z
P z
P z
1.96
464
0.9500
0.9544
(4.34)
(4.35)
(4.36)
P z
(4.37)
0.9973
0.1588
(4.38)
0.8413
(4.39)
F x
1
2
exp
4-65
x
2
2
2
dx
(4.40)
and standard
to + . To overcome this
466
4-67
Let
(4.41)
2
dx
2
du
(4.42)
F u
The function
u2
(4.43)
du
u2
u2
du 1
u2
du
(4.44)
F u
1
2
2
2
u
u2
du
(4.45)
F u
1
2 erfc u
2
where
468
(4.46)
erfc u
u2
(4.47)
du
erf u
u
0
u2
(4.48)
du
Thus,
erf u
(4.49)
1 erfc u
Table 4.6 gives the error and the complementary error functions whereas
Figure 4.48 shows graphs of the two functions. Using the information in
Table 4.6, the cumulative distribution function F(x) can be computed
with Eq.(4.46) instead of Eq.(4.40) and plotted against x. Figure 4.48
shows the F(x) obtained from such a computation for the normal
distribution of Figure 4.43.
Table 4.6. Error and Complementary Error Functions
x
erf(x)
erfc(x)
0.00
0.05
0.05637
0.94362
0.11246
0.88753
Useful
relationships
0.16799
0.83200
0.10
0.15
4-69
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
0.22270
0.77729
0.27632
0.72367
0.32862
0.67137
0.37938
0.62061
0.42839
0.57160
0.47548
0.52451
0.52050
0.47950
0.56332
0.43667
0.60385
0.39614
0.64202
0.35797
0.67780
0.32219
0.71115
0.28884
0.74210
0.25789
0.77066
0.22933
0.79690
0.20309
0.82089
0.17910
0.84270
0.15729
470
erfc(-x) = 1 + erf(x)
erf(-x) = -erf(x)
erfc(x) = 1 - erf(x)
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
2.20
2.30
2.40
2.50
2.60
2.70
0.88020
0.11979
0.91031
0.08968
0.93400
0.06599
0.95228
0.04771
0.96610
0.03389
0.97634
0.02365
0.98379
0.01621
0.98909
0.01090
0.99279
0.00721
0.99532
0.00467
0.99702
0.00297
0.99813
0.00186
0.99885
0.00114
0.99931
0.00068
0.99959
0.00040
0.99976
0.00023
0.99986
0.00013
4-71
2.80
2.90
3.00
0.99992
0.00007
0.99995
0.00004
0.99997
0.00002
472
1 and calculate
4-73
N
2
ri
i 1
(4.50)
given by
(4.51)
N
12
(4.52)
as
(4.53)
E r
b a
dr
a b
2
(4.54)
Var r
r E r
But
474
E r2
E r
(4.55)
E r2
r2
b a
dr
a2
ab b 2
3
(4.56)
Var r
a2
ab b 2
3
a b
4
b a
12
(4.57)
E z
i N
ri
i 1
N
2
E r1
E r2
... E rN
N
2
(4.58)
E z
1
2
1
1
...
2
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
(4.59)
Var z
Var r1 r2 ... rN
N
2
(4.60)
Var z
Var r1
Var r2
... Var rN
Var
N
2
(4.61)
Var z
1 1
1
N
...
0
12 12
12
12
4-75
(4.62)
(4.63)
1 . Calculate
z1
2 ln r1 cos 2 r2
(4.64)
z2
2 ln r1 sin 2 r2
(4.65)
mean
as
x1
z1
(4.66)
x2
z2
(4.67)
476
1
2
P x
ln x
2
1
exp
x
(4.68)
is the mean,
2,
of the
exp
(4.69)
1 exp 2
(4.70)
It should be noted that x has a log normal distribution whereas lnx has a
normal distribution.
Figure 4.49 shows a log normal distribution. The distribution is
positively skewed with a long tail towards the high values of x. Note that
x is always positive. Because of the high values in the tail, the mean is
larger than the median, which in turn is larger than the mode or
geometric mean. Note that in this case, the geometric mean is a better
measure of central tendency than the mean or the median.
4-77
478
4.5 ESTIMATION
4.5.1 Introduction
Estimation is one of the major applications of geostatistics, the
other being conditional simulation. The objective is to estimate the
4-79
*
8
*
3
and
*
5
the estimated from the measured values. In fact, some would claim that
there was not enough information to estimate
measured beyond location 8.
480
*
8
*
3
. From linear
interpolation
*
3
x3
x4
x2
x2
(4.71)
Let
x3
x4
x2
x2
h23
h42
(4.72)
where hij are lag distances. Substituting Eq.(4.72) into (4.71) and
rearranging gives the estimator as
4-81
*
3
(4.73)
where
(4.74)
(4.75)
or
*
o
(4.76)
i 1
(4.77)
i 1
*
3
*
5
and
*
8
. For
0.50 30
*
3
0.50 50
= 0.5 and
40
Similarly
482
*
5
0.50 50
To estimate
0.50 20
*
8
35
i,
in Eq.(4.76)
xo
x2
6 x
xo
x4
4 x
xo
x6
2 x
Total = 12 x
Based on the above lag distances, it is clear that
weight, followed by
and
0.1667
0.2500
0.5000
Total = 0.9167
where
= 1.0909. Thus,
4-83
0.1667
0.1667 1.0909
0.1819
0.2500
0.2500 1.0909
0.2727
0.5000
0.5000 1.0909
0.5455
Total
= 1.0000
Therefore,
*
8
0.1819 30
0.2727 50
0.5455 20
30
*
3
and
*
5
data were used. However, there was no good reason to use the subset of
*
3
*
8
*
3
*
5
and
and
*
5
19
18
17
15
18
15
15
18
(4.78)
*
o
eo
19
18
17
15
18
15
15
18
(4.79)
i 1
where
eo
*
o
19
18
18
o
o
15
17
o
o
4-85
15
15
o
o
18
o
o
(4.80)
8
= 1. This is not the optimum choice of the weights and will not
19
486
(4.81)
*
o
eo
19
(4.82)
x 2,
then we can look at the field of data in the SW-NE direction to find
similar errors and from them determine the statistics of our error. There
are in fact 47 such errors in the data set. They are tabulated in column 4
of Table 4.7.
Table 4.7. Errors in the SW-NE Direction of the Data Set at a Lag
Distance of
x 2.
5
1
Error
(x)
(x+h)
(x+h -
(x)
[ (x+h)- (x)]2
#
1
23
22
-1
22
20
-2
20
19
-1
21
17
-4
16
17
17
17
14
-3
19
15
-4
16
15
18
18
20
10
20
16
-4
16
11
18
18
12
19
14
-5
25
13
14
19
25
14
17
16
-1
15
16
15
-1
16
15
18
4-87
17
18
18
18
18
23
25
19
23
16
-7
49
20
15
14
-1
21
14
10
-4
16
22
10
15
25
23
15
20
25
24
20
25
25
25
25
21
-4
16
26
21
14
-7
49
27
13
10
-3
28
10
16
36
29
16
18
30
18
20
31
20
20
32
20
17
-3
33
11
13
34
13
14
35
14
23
81
36
23
18
-5
25
37
18
19
38
10
13
39
13
18
25
40
18
22
16
41
22
13
-9
81
42
17
15
-2
43
15
20
25
44
20
20
45
16
14
-2
46
14
18
16
47
15
17
Mean
0.128
Variance
15.766
488
15.447
Std Dev
3.971
3.930
Semivarianc
7.723
As shown at the bottom of Table 4.7, the mean, variance and standard
deviation of the error are
0.128
2
(4.83)
15.766
3.791
1.96
eo
1.96
(4.84)
(4.85)
Thus,
0.128 1.96 3.791
7.272
19
19
7.558
(4.86)
or
11.442
26.272
(4.87)
x 2.
x 2
490
7.723
(4.88)
0.000
2
(4.89)
15.447
3.930
These statistics of the error are very similar to those given in Eq.(4.83).
Applying Eq.(4.89) gives the following 95% confidence interval:
0.000 1.96 3.930
7.703
19
19
(4.90)
7.703
(4.91)
or
11.297
(4.92)
26.703
is
used
to
calculate
the
error
variance.
Having
now
4-91
Figure 4.55. Schematic showing the locations sample data and the
location at which an estimation is to be made.
Figure 4.57 shows two random functions Z A x and Z B x together
with their probability density functions at four locations, x1, , x4. The
mean of random function Z A x
criteria used in ordinary kriging to obtain the best estimate are (1) the
estimate should be unbiased and (2) the estimation error should have
4-93
494
Z * ( xo )
N
i
(4.93)
Z ( xi )
i 1
where Z*(xo) is the estimated value at location xo, Z(xi) are the measured
data, Z(x) is the assumed random function model, i are the weights to
be determined and xi are the locations where the variable of interest has
been measured (i.e., the data). Note that in this model, the Z(xi) are just
samples drawn from the random function Z(x). Moreover, Z(x) is a
stationary random function with a constant mean, m, which is
independent of the locations xo and xi. Also, Eq.(4.93) is valid in 1D, 2D
or 3D.
Let the true but unknown value at xo be Z(xo). The estimation error
is given by
e( xo )
Z * ( xo ) Z ( xo )
(4.94)
E e( xo )
E Z * ( xo ) Z ( xo )
(4.95)
4-95
N
i
Z ( xi ) Z ( xo )
i 1
496
(4.96)
N
i
E Z ( xi )
E Z ( xo )
(4.97)
i 1
But the expectations of the random variables, Z(xi) and Z(xo) are equal
and is given by the mean of Z(x), m, which is a constant for the
stationary random function model used in the estimation. Eq.(4.97) can
now be written as
N
m
im
i 1
1 m 0
(4.98)
i 1
(4.99)
i 1
Z * ( xo ) Z ( xo )
(4.100)
2
e
N
i
Z ( xi ) Z ( xo )
(4.101)
i 1
Let us add and subtract the mean, m, from the inner bracket in
Eq.(4.101) and make use of Eq.(4.99) (
4-97
i = 1) to obtain
2
e
N
i
Z ( xi ) m
(4.102)
( Z ( xo ) m)
i 1
2
e
Z ( xi ) m
Z ( xo ) m
i 1
N
i
( Z ( xi ) m)( Z ( xo ) m) (4.103)
i 1
2
e
N
i
i 1
( Z ( xi ) m)( Z ( x j ) m)
Z ( xo ) m
j 1
N
i
Z ( xi ) m Z ( xo ) m
i 1
.(4.104)
2
e
N
i
i 1
E ( Z ( xi ) m)( Z ( x j ) m)
Z ( xo ) m
j 1
(4.105)
N
i
Z ( xi ) m Z ( xo ) m
i 1
2
e
N
i
i 1
C (0) 2
j C ( hij )
j 1
i
i 1
498
C (hio )
(4.106)
where C(hij) is the covariance function, hij is the lag distance between
locations i and j, and hio is the lag distance between locations o and i.
Recall that the location of the point at which an estimate is to be made is
o and the locations of the data to be used in the estimation are at points
i. Eq.(4.106) can be rearranged as
N
2
e
C (0)
2
j C ( hij )
i
i 1
j 1
C (hio )
(4.107)
i 1
2
e
N
i
i 1
C (hij ) 2
j 1
C (hio )
(4.108)
i 1
1
2
Z ( x ) Z ( x h)
4-99
(4.109)
Adding and subtracting the mean of the random function from the inner
bracket of Eq.(4.109) gives
( h)
1
2
Z ( x) m
Z ( x h) m
(4.110)
1
2
Z ( x) m
Z ( x h) m
2 Z ( x ) m Z ( x h) m
(4.111)
1
2
E
2
2
Z ( x) m Z ( x) m
E
1
2
Z ( x h) m Z ( x h) m
Z ( x h) m Z ( x ) m
(4.112)
(h)
1
2
C (0)
1
2
C (0) C (h)
(4.113)
(4.114)
( ) C (0) C ( )
(4.115)
( ) C (0)
(4.116)
Figure 4.59 compares the variogram and the covariance function for a
stationary random function.
C (hij ) C (0)
(hij )
(4.117)
C (hio ) C (0)
(hio )
(4.118)
4-101
2
e
i 1
j 1
C (0)
C (0)
(hij )
N
i
C (0)
(4.119)
(hio )
i 1
2
e
C (0) C (0)
N
i
i 1
j 1
i 1
(hij ) 2C (0)
j 1
i
i 1
N
i
(hio ) (4.120)
i 1
2
e
C (0) C (0)
N
i
i 1
(hij ) 2C (0) 2
j 1
N
i
(hio )
(4.121)
i 1
2
e
i 1
j 1
(hij ) 2
N
i
(4.122)
(hio )
i 1
Minimize
2
e
( i)
i 1
j 1
4102
2
j C ( hij )
N
i
i 1
C (hio )
(4.123)
Subject to
(4.124)
i 1
L( i , )
i 1
j 1
2
j C ( hij )
2
i C ( hio )
i 1
(4.125)
i 1
L( 1 ,
, )
2
1
2
2
C (h11 )
1 2
C (h12 )
C (h21 )
2 1
(4.126)
C (h21 ) 2C (h10 ) 2
(4.127)
(4.128)
2 1C (h11 )
C (h12 )
C (h12 )
(4.129)
2 0
1
2
2C (h10 )
2C (h20 )
2
(4.130)
1
2
2C (h10 )
2C (h20 )
2
(4.131)
1
2
C (h10 )
C (h20 )
1
(4.132)
4104
1,
2 and
( 1,
, )
2
1
2
2
C (h11 )
1 2
C (h12 )
C (h21 )
2 1
(4.133)
( 1,
, )
C (h11 )
C (h12 )
C (h21 )
C (h22 )
(4.134)
2 1C (h10 ) 2 2C (h20 )
C (h11 )
C (h12 ) C (h10 )
(4.135)
C (h21 )
C (h22 ) C (h20 )
(4.136)
and
2
1
C (h10 )
C (h20 )
2 1C (h10 ) 2 2C (h20 )
4-105
(4.137)
which simplifies to
2
e min
C (hio )
(4.138)
i 1
1,
2 and
C (h11 )
C (h21 )
C (h31 )
C (h41 )
1
C (h12 )
C (h22 )
C (h32 )
C (h42 )
1
C (h13 )
C (h23 )
C (h33 )
C (h43 )
1
C (h14 )
C (h24 )
C (h34 )
C (h44 )
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
C (h10 )
C (h20 )
C (h30 )
C (h40 )
1
(4.139)
and
2
e min
C (hio )
i 1
(4.140)
C (hij )
j 1
(4.141)
N
j
j 1
4106
2
e min
C (hio )
(4.142)
i 1
hij
2.
h11
h12
h13
h14
h12
h13
h14
h21
h22
h23
h24
h21
h23
h24
h31
h41
h32
h42
h33
h43
h34
h44
h31
h41
h32
h42
0
h43
h34
0
(4.143)
Except for the one zero at the bottom corner, the diagonal
entries of the matrix equation to be solved are given by
C (h11 ) C (h22 )
3.
(4.144)
All the off diagonal entries of the matrix equation are less than
the diagonal entries. Thus, the matrix is diagonally dominant.
This is a desirable structure for solving the system of linear
simultaneous equations.
4.
5.
4-107
6.
7.
Minimize
2
e
( i)
i
i 1
Subject to
(hij ) 2
j 1
(4.145)
(hio )
i 1
N
i
(4.146)
i 1
L( i , )
i 1
j 1
(hij ) 2
(hio ) 2
i 1
(4.147)
i 1
L( 1 ,
, )
2
1
(h11 )
2
2
1 2
(h22 ) 2
1
(h12 )
1
(h21 )
2 1
(h10 ) 2
(h20 )
(4.148)
Differentiating the Lagrangian and equating to zero will give the following
linear simultaneous equations:
4108
(h11 )
(h12 )
(h21 ) 2 (h10 ) 2
(4.149)
(h22 ) 2 (h20 ) 2
(4.150)
L
1
(h12 )
(h21 ) 2
(4.151)
2 0
2 (h11 )
(h12 ) (h21 )
(h12 ) (h21 )
2 (h22 )
2
2
2 (h10 )
2 (h20 )
1
2
(4.152)
(h12 )
(h10 )
(h21 )
(h22 )
(h20 )
1,
2 and
(4.153)
( 1,
, )
2
1
2
2
(h11 )
1 2
(h22 ) 2
4-109
(h12 )
2 1
(h10 ) 2
(h21 )
(h20 )
(4.154)
( 1,
, )
(h11 )
(h10 ) 2
(h12 )
(h21 )
(h22 )
(4.155)
(h20 )
(h11 )
(h12 )
(h10 )
(4.156)
(h21 )
(h22 )
(h20 )
(4.157)
and
(h10 )
2
2
1
(h10 ) 2
(h20 )
2
(h20 )
(4.158)
which simplifies to
2
e min
2
i
(hio )
i 1
(4.159)
4110
(h11 )
(h21 )
(h31 )
(h41 )
1
(h12 )
(h22 )
(h32 )
(h42 )
1
(h13 )
(h23 )
(h33 )
(h43 )
1
(h14 )
(h24 )
(h34 )
(h44 )
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
(h10 )
(h20 )
(h30 )
(h40 )
1
(4.160)
and
2
e min
4
i
(hio )
(4.161)
i 1
(hij )
j 1
(4.162)
N
j
j 1
2
e min
N
i
(hio )
i 1
(4.163)
(h11 )
(h22 )
... (hNN ) 0
4-111
(4.164)
All the diagonal entries of the matrix equation are zero. This is an
undesirable structure for the solution of the system of linear
simultaneous equations. This is why the formulation and solution
of the estimation problem in terms of the covariance function is
usually preferred over the formulation in terms of the variogram.
2.
Example 4.1
The porosities at locations 1 and 4 in a linear reservoir have been
measured as shown Figure 4.60. The locations are evenly spaced 10
meters apart. The variogram for the porosity distribution in this reservoir
is shown in Figure 4.61. We are required to estimate the porosity at
location 3 at which no measurement was made.
4112
1.
2.
4-113
C10
C21 C22
C20
C11
1
4114
(4.165)
h12
h10
30 20
h21
h22
h20
30
10
meters
(4.166)
2 5 1
1 1 0
3
4
1
1
3
2
3
0
*
0
1
3
*
3
2
3
1
10
3
2
3
25
20%
2
e min
2
i
i 1
C (hio ) 5 0
1
2
x3
x4
3
3
4-115
4
3
(4.167)
e min
4
3
1.1547
1.96 1.1547
2.26
20
20
1.96 1.1547
2.26
or
17.74
The problem could also be solved in terms of the variogram. In this case,
the corresponding equations are
11
12
21
22
1
1
0
0 3
3 0
1 1
1
0
10
20
(4.168)
1
2
4116
2
1
1
(4.169)
1
3
2
3
0
*
0
1
3
*
3
2
3
1
10
3
2
3
25
20%
2
e min
(hio )
i 1
1
2
x2
x1
3
3
4
3
e min
4
3
1.1547
1.96 1.1547
2.26
20
20
1.96 1.1547
2.26
or
17.74
4-117
h12
h22
h10
h20
30
30
30
meters
(4.170)
2 5 1
1 1 0
1
0
0
*
0
*
1
1 10
0 25
10%
2
e min
2
i
C (hio ) 5 0
1x5 0 x 2
i 1
4118
(4.171)
C h
100e
0.3 h
(4.172)
*
8
along with the measured data for the subsequent estimations. Thus, the
number of equations to be solved increases as the estimation progresses.
We begin the calculations by visiting location (node) 8. In order to
generate a compact matrix equation, we renumber the known values as
shown in Figure 4.62. Next, we construct the lag distance matrix for
location 8 as shown in Table 4.8. The entries in Table 4.8 should be read
as follows. The indices 1, 2, 3 represent the locations of the renumbered
known values. The index 0 represents the location at which an estimate
is to be made. The other entries are lag distances. For example, h10 is the
lag distance (6 x) from the point of estimation to the renumbered sample
1, h20 is the lag distance (4 x) from the point of estimation to the
renumbered sample 2 and h30 is the lag distance (2 x) from the point of
estimation to the renumbered sample 3. These are the lag distances
needed to construct the right hand side vector of the system of equations
4-119
to be solved. Therefore, they have been transferred into the last column
of the table under the heading hi0. The other entries in the table should
be self explanatory. For example, h11 is the lag distance between the
renumbered sample 1 and itself, which is zero.
6 x
4 x
2 x
hi0
0 x
2 x
4 x
6 x
2 x
0 x
2 x
4 x
4 x
2 x
0 x
2 x
4120
C11 C12
C21 C22
C31 C32
1
1
In this problem,
C13
C23
C33
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
C10
C20
C30
1
(4.173)
4.8 and Eq.(4.172), the entries of the covariance matrix of Eq.(4.173) can
easily be computed. For example, C12 is given by
C12 h12
C 2
100e
0.3 2
54.8812
1
2
3
16.5299
30.1194
54.8812
1
(4.174)
The
Cij 1
0.0117
0.0090
0.0026
0.0090
0.0181
0.0090
0.0026
0.0090
0.0117
0.4080
0.1841
0.4080
0.4080
0.1841
0.4080
63.1862
(4.175)
Multiplying the right hand side of Eq.(4.174) into the inverse matrix of
Eq.(4.175) gives the solution vector as
4-121
1
2
3
0.1841
0.0830
(4.176)
0.7329
28.5088
*
8
0.1841 30
0.0830 50
0.7329 20
24.3321
2
e min
C (hio ) 100
28.5089
i 1
e min
82.7435
9.0963
24.3321
1.96 9.0963
24.33 17.83
The estimated value at location 8 is then added to the sample data set in
preparation for the estimation at location 1 as shown in Figure 4.63.
4122
82.7434
Next, we visit location 1 and construct the lag distance matrix shown in
Table 4.9.
Table 4.9. Lag Distance Matrix hij for Location 1
1
1 x
3 x
5 x
7 x
hi0
0 x
2 x
4 x
6 x
1 x
2 x
0 x
2 x
4 x
3 x
4 x
2 x
0 x
2 x
5 x
6 x
4 x
2 x
0 x
7 x
4-123
C11
C21
C31
C41
1
C12
C22
C32
C42
1
C13 C14
C23 C24
C33 C34
C43 C44
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
C10
C20
C30
C40
1
(4.177)
Using the matrix of lag distances in Table 4.9 and Eq.(4.170), Eq.(4.177)
becomes
1
2
3
4
74.0818
40.6570
22.3130
12.2456
1
(4.178)
Cij 1
0.0121
0.0089
0.0010
0.0022
0.0089
0.0182
0.0083
0.0010
0.0010
0.0083
0.0182
0.0089
0.0022
0.0010
0.0089
0.0121
0.3445
0.1555
0.1555
0.3445
0.3445
0.1555
0.1555
0.3445
53.3636
(4.179)
Multiplying the right hand side of Eq.(4.178) into the inverse matrix of
Eq.(4.179) gives the solution vector as
1
2
3
4
0.8301
0.0403
0.0403
0.0893
13.8309
4124
(4.180)
*
1
0.8301 30
0.0403 50
0.0403 20
0.0893 24.3321
29.8968
2
e min
C (hio ) 100
13.8309
i 1
48.7035
e min
48.7035
6.9788
29.8968
1.96 6.9788
29.99 13.68
The estimated value at location 1 is then added to the sample data set in
preparation for the estimation at location 5 as shown in Figure 4.64.
Next, we visit location 5 and construct the lag distance matrix shown in
Table 4.10.
4-125
3 x
1 x
1 x
3 x
4 x
hi0
0 x
2 x
4 x
6 x
1 x
3 x
2 x
0 x
2 x
4 x
3 x
1 x
4 x
2 x
0 x
2 x
5 x
1 x
6 x
4 x
2 x
0 x
7 x
3 x
1 x
3 x
5 x
7 x
0 x
4 x
4126
C11
C21
C31
C41
C51
1
C12
C22
C32
C42
C52
1
C13 C14
C23 C24
C33 C34
C43 C44
C53 C54
1
1
C15
C25
C35
C45
C55
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
C10
C20
C30
C40
C50
1
(4.181)
Using the matrix of lag distances in Table 4.10 and Eq.(4.170), Eq.(4.181)
becomes
1
2
3
4
5
40.6570
74.0818
74.0818
(4.182)
40.6570
30.1194
1
Cij 1
0.0262
0.0082
0.0003
0.0007
0.0170
0.1088
0.0082
0.0182
0.0083
0.0009
0.0008
0.1440
0.0003
0.0083
0.0182
0.0088
0.0008
0.1440
0.0007
0.0009
0.0088
0.0122
0.0018
0.3192
0.0170
0.0008
0.0008
0.0018
0.0205
0.2840
0.1088
0.1440
0.1440
(4.183)
0.3192
0.2840
49.4359
Multiplying the right hand side of Eq.(4.182) into the inverse matrix of
Eq.(4.183) gives the solution vector as
4-127
0.0047
0.4846
1
2
0.4846
0.0138
0.0123
2.1441
3
4
5
(4.184)
*
5
0.0047 30
0.4846 50
0.0123 29.8968
0.4846 20
0.0138 24.3321
34.7659
2
e min
3
i
C (hio ) 100
i 1
2.1441
29.2243
e min
29.2243
5.4059
34.7659
1.96 5.4059
34.77 10.60
The estimated value at location 5 is then added to the sample data set in
preparation for the estimation at location 7 as shown in Figure 4.65.
4128
Next, we visit location 7 and construct the lag distance matrix shown in
Table 4.11.
Table 4.11. Lag Distance Matrix hij for Location 7
1
5 x
3 x
1 x
1 x
6 x
2 x
hi0
0 x
2 x
4 x
6 x
1 x
3 x
5 x
2 x
0 x
2 x
4 x
3 x
1 x
3 x
4 x
2 x
0 x
2 x
5 x
1 x
1 x
6 x
4 x
2 x
0 x
7 x
3 x
1 x
1 x
3 x
5 x
7 x
0 x
4 x
6 x
2 x
1 x
1 x
3 x
4 x
0 x
2 x
4-129
C11
C21
C31
C41
C51
C61
1
C12
C22
C32
C42
C52
C62
1
C13 C14
C23 C24
C33 C34
C43 C44
C53 C54
C63 C64
1
1
C15
C25
C35
C45
C55
C65
1
C16
C26
C36
C46
C56
C66
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
C10
C20
C30
C40
C50
C60
1
(4.185)
Using the matrix of lag distances in Table 4.11 and Eq.(4.170), Eq.(4.185)
becomes
1
2
3
4
5
6
22.3130
40.6570
74.0818
74.0818
16.5299
54.8812
1
...
Cij 1
0.0322
0.0023
0.0073
0.0006
0.0207
0.0159
0.0993
0.0023
0.0239
0.0008
0.0009
0.0044
0.0155
0.1348
0.0073
0.0008
0.0279
0.0087
0.0055
0.0202
0.1320
0.0006
0.0009
0.0087
0.0122
0.0019
0.0002
0.3191
4130
0.0207
0.0044
0.0055
0.0019
0.0228
0.0097
0.2898
0.0159
0.0155
0.0202
0.0002
0.0097
0.0420
0.0251
0.0993
0.1348
0.1320
0.3191 (4.187)
0.2898
0.0251
49.4209
(4.186)
Multiplying the right hand side of Eq.(4.186) into the inverse matrix of
Eq.(4.187) gives the solution vector as
0.0047
0.0058
0.4841
0.4921
0.0123
0.0009
2.1422
1
2
3
4
5
6
(4.188)
*
7
0.0047 30
0.0058 50
0.0123 29.8968
0.4841 20
0.0009 34.7659
0.4921 24.3321
22.4886
2
e min
3
i
C (hio ) 100
i 1
2.1422
e min
29.2242
5.4059
22.4886
1.96 5.4059
22.4886 10.60
4-131
29.2242
The estimated value at location 7 is then added to the sample data set in
preparation for the estimation at location 3 as shown in Figure 4.66.
Next, we visit location 3 and construct the lag distance matrix shown in
Table 4.12.
Table 4.12. Lag Distance Matrix hij for Location 3
1
1 x
1 x
3 x
5 x
2 x
2 x
4 x
hi0
0 x
2 x
4 x
6 x
1 x
3 x
3 x
1 x
2 x
0 x
2 x
4 x
3 x
1 x
1 x
1 x
4 x
2 x
0 x
2 x
5 x
1 x
1 x
3 x
6 x
4 x
2 x
0 x
7 x
3 x
3 x
5 x
1 x
3 x
5 x
7 x
0 x
4 x
4 x
2 x
2 x
1 x
1 x
3 x
4 x
0 x
0 x
2 x
2 x
1 x
1 x
3 x
4 x
0 x
0 x
4 x
4132
C11
C21
C31
C41
C51
C61
C71
1
C12
C22
C32
C42
C52
C62
C72
1
C13
C23
C33
C43
C53
C63
C73
1
C14
C24
C34
C44
C54
C64
C74
1
C15
C25
C35
C45
C55
C65
C75
1
C16
C26
C36
C46
C56
C66
C76
1
C17
C27
C37
C47
C57
C67
C77
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
C10
C20
C30
C40
C50
C60
C70
1
(4.189)
Using the matrix of lag distances in Table 4.12 and Eq.(4.170), Eq.(4.189)
becomes
4-133
74.0818
74.0818
2
40.6570
3
22.3130
4
54.8812
5
54.8812
6
30.1194
7
1
(4.190)
1
Cij 1
0.0322
0.0023
0.0074
0.0023
0.0239
0.0007
0.0074
0.0007
0.0359
0.0006
0.0008
0.0006
0.0207
0.0044
0.0053
0.0159
0.0155
0.0202
0.0001
0.0002
0.0166
0.0990
0.1343
0.0965
0.0006
0.0207
0.0159
0.0001
0.0008
0.0044
0.0155
0.0002
0.0006
0.0053
0.0202
0.0166
0.0205
0.0017
0.0001
0.0168
0.0017
0.0228
0.0097
0.0004
0.0001
0.0097
0.0420
0.00004
0.0168
0.0004
0.00004
0.0342
0.2830
0.2888
0.0250
0.0733
0.0990
0.1343
0.0965
0.2830
0.2888
0.2306
0.0733
49.2637
(4.191)
Multiplying the right hand side of Eq.(4.190) into the inverse matrix of
Eq.(4.191) gives the solution vector as
0.4841
0.5972
0.1170
0.0151
0.0151
0.2325
0.0039
2.6342
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
(4.192)
*
3
0.4841 30
0.5972 50
0.0151 29.8968
0.1170 20
0.2325 34.7659
0.0151 24.3321
0.0039 22.4886
39.5490
2
e min
3
i
C (hio ) 100
2.6342
i 1
29.2455
29.2455
e min
5.4079
39.5490
1.96 5.4079
39.55 10.60
*
3
and
*
5
that
are essentially the same as those obtained from the linear interpolation
of Figure 4.52.
Table 4.13. Results of Estimations for Example 4.2.
Location
*
i
2
e min
e min
1.96
e min
*
i
1.96
e min
*
i
1.96
29.90
48.72
6.98
13.68
16.22
43.58
39.55
29.27
5.41
10.60
28.95
50.15
34.77
29.27
5.41
10.60
24.17
45.37
22.49
29.27
5.41
10.60
11.89
33.09
24.33
82.81
9.10
17.84
6.49
42.17
30
3
4
50
5
6
20
4-135
e min
Figure 4.67. Graph of the measured and the kriged values for Example
4.2.
properties.
Further,
we
are
able
to
estimate
the
4-137
locations for which no sample data have been measured. The simulated
values should honor the measured sample data and the correlation
structure of the heterogeneity as revealed by the analysis of the sample
data. Further, it should retain the local variability. Here is an algorithm
for performing such a stochastic simulation known as Sequential
Gaussian Simulation (SGS).
1.
2.
3.
si
where
si
*
i
at location i,
ei
(4.193)
ei i
*
i
= 0 and
4138
4.
5.
6.
Repeat the calculations until all grid nodes have a simulated value.
7.
4-139
Eq.(4.64) the following five variates were drawn from a standard normal
distribution:
0.8821
-1.1679
0.6419
2.8546
0.91009
*
8
e8 8
*
s1
*
1
e1 1
*
s5
*
5
e5 5
*
s7
*
7
e7 7
*
s3
*
3
e3 3
24.33
9.10 0.8821
29.90
6.98
34.77
5.41 0.6419
38.24
22.49
5.41 2.8546
37.92
39.55
5.41 0.9009
44.42
1.1679
32.36
21.75
Figure 4.68 shows the measured values, kriged values and the simulated
values.
4140
4-141
the water. Figure 4.70 shows the oil recovery curve from the experiment.
It should observed that even for a fairly uniform sandpack, the oil
recovery after 3 pore volumes of water injection is less than 60% of the
initial oil in place. What will be the oil recovery in a reservoir with
significant permeability heterogeneity?
4-143
and
correlation
lengths
using
Sequential
Gaussian
medium.
The
In fact, as Lx
4144
Figure 4.74 shows a comparison of the recovery curve for the waterflood
experiment and the numerical simulation of the experiment. The
agreement between the two recovery curves is good. The simulation was
used to determine the relative permeability curves to be used to scale the
laboratory waterflood to the synthetic heterogeneous reservoirs.
4-145
4146
4-147
Figure 4.75 compares the simulated oil recovery curves for each of
the twelve heterogeneous synthetic reservoirs with that of the laboratory
waterflood experiment. The following observations can be made from
these results.
variability
the
in
permeability
distribution
(low
Dykstra-Parsons
shown by the response in the last permeability field in Figure 4.75 (Lx =
2 and V = 0.87). In this case, the waterflood effeciency is significantly
less in the heterogeneous reservoir than in the laboratory sandpack.
To
investigate
performance
between
the
the
reason
for
laboratory
the
significant
waterflood
in
disparity
a
in
relatively
4-149
performance
that
is
comparable
to
the
laboratory
4150
4-151
NOMENCLATURE
a
covariance function
4152
C0 =
nugget effect
erf =
error function
erfc =
pay thickness
lag distance
ln =
Lx =
Ly =
s2 =
linear coordinate
random variable
population mean
Lagrange parameter
population variance
porosity, fraction
variogram
kriging weights
sample data
sample mean
4-153
4154
4-155
4156
CHAPTER 5
or
transition
zone
develops
at
the
front
in
which
the
5-1
52
movement of fertilizers in the soil and the leaching of salts from the soil
in agriculture.
k phase
(5.1)
phase
phase
phase
is the
displacing fluid
(5.2)
displaced fluid
displacing fluid
displaced fluid
(5.3)
displacing fluid
displaced fluid
54
dispersion will dilute and degrade the effectiveness of the slug as the
process progresses. On the other hand, mixing caused by dispersion can
allow the injected solvent to spread and contact more of the displaced
fluid than if dispersion was absent. In this case, dispersion is favorable
to the displacement efficiency.
Permeability heterogeneity of the porous medium tends to reduce
the displacement efficiency for the most part. Because the heterogeneity
has a correlation structure, high permeabilities tend to occur next to
high permeabilities and low permeabilities tend to occur next to low
permeabilities as the porous medium is traversed from one point to
another. These permeability arrangements cause the injected fluid to
channel through the high permeability layers, thereby leaving the low
permeability layers unswept.
Figure
5.1
shows
CT
images
of
first-contact
miscible
Figure
5.3
shows
the
images
of
first-contact
miscible
58
5-9
Figure
5.5
shows
the
images
of
first-contact
miscible
510
5-11
5-13
514
5-15
516
5-17
518
5-19
520
to occur faster (further) in some pores than in others. This causes the
marked fluid particles to be spread out in the direction of flow. This is
longitudinal dispersion in the direction of flow. In Figure 5.15c, the
streamlines fluctuate with respect to the mean flow direction as the fluid
particles navigate around the solid grains. This effect of the tortuosity of
the porous medium causes the fluid particles to be spread out in the
transverse direction with respect to the mean flow direction. This is
transverse dispersion, perpendicular to the direction of flow.
Finally,
there is local mixing of the fluids within the pores as shown in Figure
5.16. This contributes to the mechanical dispersion.
522
uC
(5.4)
D C
5-23
(5.5)
Dd
(5.6)
Dm
.J
(5.7)
where t is time and J is the total mass flux vector of species i due to
advection and dispersion and is given by the vector sum
J
Ja
(5.8)
Jd
Substituting Eqs.(5.4) and (5.5) into (5.7) gives the mass transport
equation for a constant porosity medium as
C
t
. uC
. D C
(5.9)
equation,
first-contact
miscible
displacement
524
C
t
. uC
(5.10)
C
t
Dd
(5.11)
C
t
ux
C
x
DL
C
x2
(5.12)
vx C
x
DL
5-25
C
x2
(5.13)
solute
due
to
adsorption,
chemical
reaction,
biological
C
t
ux C
Rf x
DL 2C
R f x2
(5.14)
C
t
ux
C
x
DL
C x, 0
526
Ci
C
x2
(5.12)
(5.15)
C 0, t
Cj
(5.16)
Ci
(5.17)
,t
is
the
inlet
boundary
condition,
which
specifies
the
CD
tD
CD
xD
1
N Pe
CD
xD2
(5.18)
C xD , 0
(5.19)
CD 0, t D
(5.20)
(5.21)
, tD
5-27
where
CD
tD
C x, t Ci
C j Ci
(5.22)
uxt
L
(5.23)
xD
N Pe
qt
A L
x
L
ux L
DL
(5.24)
qL
A DL
(5.25)
N Pe
ux Dp
DL
(5.26)
528
C x, t
vx x
DL
Ci
x uxt
erfc
2
2 DLt
e erfc
x uxt
2 DLt
(5.27)
erfc u
u2
du
(5.28)
The error function and the complementary error function are related by
erf u
erfc u
(5.29)
erfc
1 erf u
(5.30)
erf
erf u
(5.31)
Also,
5-29
C D xD , t D
1
x t
erfc D D
2
t
2 D
N Pe
e xD N Pe erfc
xD t D
t
2 D
N Pe
(5.32)
Ogata and Banks (1961) demonstrated that the second term in the
square bracket of the right hand sides of Eqs.(5.27) and Eq.(5.32) can be
neglected in comparison to the first term. The solution given by Eq.(5.27)
then becomes
C x, t
Ci
x uxt
erfc
2
2 DLt
(5.33)
form is
C D xD , t D
1
erfc
2
xD t D
t
2 D
N Pe
(5.34)
or
C D xD , t D
1
erfc
2
530
N Pe
xD t D
2 tD
(5.35)
2t D
and standard deviation
N Pe
2t D
.
N Pe
(5.36)
2t D
. The shape of the solution is
N Pe
532
5-33
xD
3.625
tD
N Pe
(5.37)
or in dimensional form by
x 3.625 DL t
(5.38)
x versus
534
remarkable
thing
happens
xD t D
tD
to
the
(5.39)
solutions
at
the
various
xD t D
.
tD
5-35
536
CD 1, t D
1
erfc
2
N Pe
1 tD
2 tD
(5.40)
2
and standard deviation
N Pe
2
. Figure 5.22 shows the breakthrough
N Pe
5-37
1 tD
tD
(5.41)
538
5-39
540
C D xD , t D
1
erfc
2
xD
tD
Rf
tD
2
R f N Pe
(5.42)
D x, y , z
Dxx
Dxy
Dxz
Dyx
Dzx
Dyy
Dzy
Dyz
Dzz
(5.43)
in 3D, and by
D x, y
Dxx
Dyx
Dxy
Dyy
(5.44)
D u , v, w
DL
0
0
DT
0
0
DW
(5.45)
in 3D, and
D u, v
DL
DT
(5.46)
542
DT .
Using
Eq.(5.6),
the
longitudinal
and
transverse
dispersion
DL
DLd
DLm
(5.47)
DT
DTd
DTm
(5.48)
where the two terms on the right sides of Eqs.(5.46) and (5.47) represent
the contributions of molecular diffusion and mechanical dispersion to
the
dispersion
coefficients.
Based
on
experimental
observations,
DL
Do
C1 C2
DT
Do
C1 C3
uD p
Do
uD p
Do
(5.49)
(5.50)
particle diameter of the porous medium. It has been found also from
experiments that C1 is given by
C1
1
F
(5.51)
DL
Do
DT
Do
C2
C3
uD p
(5.52)
Do
uD p
(5.53)
Do
is of the order of 1 to
1.25.
vD p
Do
DL
D
and T with the Peclet
Do
Do
Johnson (1963). Figure 5.26a shows that at Peclet Numbers less than
0.02,
molecular
diffusion
dominates
the
longitudinal
dispersion
544
is approximately 1. Under
DL
C2
uD p
Do
5-45
Do
(5.54)
DT
where
C3
uD p
Do
Do
(5.55)
is the
5-47
N Pe
(5.56)
Figures
5.29
and
5.30
show
values
of
measured
548
5-49
550
5-51
implemented,
the
breakthrough
curve
will
approximate
the
1 tD
tD
1 tD
tD
CD 0.9
552
1 tD
tD
(5.57)
CD 0.1
DL
uL
1 tD
tD
CD 0.9
1 tD
tD
CD 0.1
(5.58)
3.625
2
N Pe
1 tD
tD
CD 0.84
1 tD
tD
(5.59)
CD 0.16
DL
uL
8
1 tD
tD
CD 0.84
1 tD
tD
(5.60)
CD 0.16
Number
and
the
longitudinal
dispersion
coefficient.
The
Eq.(5.34) and the experiment are in good agreement indicating that the
Peclet Number is correct. However, at late dimensionless times, the
profiles obtained from Eq.(5.34) have traveled further than those from
the experiment. This is evidence of retardation caused by adsorption.
Figure 5.35 shows the history match using Eq.(5.42) with a retardation
factor, Rf, of 1.11. The agreement between the two sets of solvent
concentration profiles is good. The parameters that resulted in this
history match are N Pe
159 , DL
First-Contact Miscible
Porous Medium
Berea Sandstone
Length (cm)
60.2
Diameter (cm)
5.1
160.4
17.3
Fluids
Displacing Fluid
1.029
Displaced Fluid
1.028
1.0
2.742x10-3
5-55
1.714x10-2
556
5-57
DL
431x10 5 cm 2 / s and
method, the dispersion coefficient and the dispersivity are less than
calculated previously because the effect of the permeability heterogeneity
was excluded from the calculations.
558
5-59
Figure 5.36. Growth of mixing zone length with time for the Berea
sandstone core (Peters et al., 1996).
A summary of the experiment for the unconsolidated sandpack is
presented in Table 5.2. Figure 5.37 shows the CT images of the tracer
test in the sandpack. The growth of the mixing zone also is clearly
visible. The mixing zone is distorted by the heterogeneity of the
sandpack. It should be recalled that this sandpack contained radial
heterogeneities based on the packing method that was used in preparing
it. Figure 5.38 shows the permeability distribution for the sandpack.
Figure 5.39 shows a preliminary history match of the solvent
concentration profiles using Eq.(5.34). The slopes of the profiles from
Eq.(5.34) and the experiment are in good agreement indicating that the
Peclet Number is correct. However, at late dimensionless times, the
profiles obtained from Eq.(5.34) have traveled further than those from
the experiment. There is retardation caused by adsorption in the
sandpack. Figure 5.40 shows the history match using Eq.(5.42) with a
retardation factor of 1.04. The agreement between the two sets of solvent
concentration profiles is good. The parameters that resulted in this
history match are N Pe
554 , DL
0.098 cm .
Figure 5.41 shows the growth of the mixing zone length with time
for the sandpack. The longitudinal dispersion coefficient and longitudinal
dispersivity
DL
are
calculated
82 x10 5 cm 2 / s and
from
the
mixing
zone
length
as
0.080 cm .
more
dispersion
in
the
Berea
560
sandstone
core
than
in
the
unconsolidated sandpack. The results of the tracer tests for both porous
media are summarized in Table 5.3.
Table 5.2. Experimental Conditions for Tracer Test in Unconsolidated
Sandpack
Type of Displacement
First-Contact Miscible
Porous Medium
Unconsolidated Sandpack
Length (cm)
54.2
Diameter (cm)
4.8
6400
29.7
Fluids
Displacing Fluid
Density
of
Displacing
(g/cm3)
1.089
1.262
Displaced Fluid
1.127
0.9
3.037x10-3
1.023x10-2
95
5-61
5-63
564
5-65
Figure 5.41. Growth of mixing zone length with time for unconsolidated
sandpack (Peters et al., 1996).
566
Porous Medium
Berea
Unconsolidated
Sandstone
Sandpack
600x10-5
100x10-5
0.379
0.098
431x10-5
82x10-5
Heterogeneity (cm)
0.272
0.080
Retardation Factor
1.11
1.04
Peclet Number
159
554
C
C
ur
t
r
2
L ur
C
r2
(5.61)
Gelhar and Collins (1971) give the solution of Eq.(5.61) with appropriate
initial and boundary conditions for a single-well tracer test as
568
CD
t D t Di
1
erfc
2
16
3
tD
tDi
1
1
2
tD
tDi
1
2
(5.62)
where
qt
h
(5.63)
Figure 5.43. Comparison of tracer concentration and Eq.(5.62)for singlewell injection-withdrawal test (Pickens and Grisak, 1981).
5-71
Rock Characteristics
Porosity ( )
Permeability (k)
Pore size ( )
Pore size distribution (frequency)
Heterogeneity
DykstraParsons coefficient (V)
Variogram ( )
Correlation length (range of influence, a)
Chemical reaction
Adsorption (retardation factor, Rf)
Biological transformation
Radioactive decay
Morphology of the porous medium ( )
572
Pore structure
Cementation
Dead end pores
Tortuosity
Mean grain diameter (Dp)
Specific surface area (S)
2.
Fluid Properties
Viscosity of the displaced fluid ( o)
Viscosity of the displacing fluid ( s)
Density of the displaced fluid ( o)
Density of the displacing fluid ( s)
Binary diffusion coefficient between the displaced and displacing
fluids (Do)
3.
DL
f1
, D p , u, Do ,
(5.64)
DL
Do
f2
uD p
Do
D 3p
Do
(5.65)
, will be a
constant equal to 1 and its effect will be eliminated from the experiment.
Also, the density of the injected fluid should be matched with that of the
displaced fluid. In this case, the dimensionless group,
D 3p
Do
, will be a
f3
uD p
Do
(5.66)
f4
uD p
Do
574
(5.67)
uD p
Do
DL
D
and T as
Do
Do
( C)
t
.(vC )
)
t
.( D C ) 0
(5.68)
.( v ) 0
(5.69)
gz )
(5.70)
(P
5-75
mixture
Cs
Cs
mixture
(1 Cs )
1 Cs
1/ 4
s
1/ 4
o
(5.71)
(5.72)
where
Dxx
Dyx
Dzx
Dxy
Dyy
Dzy
Dxz
Dyz
Dzz
(5.73)
k xx
k yx
k zx
k xy
k yy
k zy
k xz
k yz
k zz
(5.74)
and
576
mixing rule. This mixing rule also has been verified in laboratory
measurements as shown in Figure 5.46 for glycerol and brine.
Figure 5.45. Verification of linear density mixing rule for two first-contact
miscible fluids: Fluid 1 is brine; Fluid 2 is glycerol and water.
5-77
Of course, the
578
were
imaged
by
NMR.
Each
simulation
entailed
the
using
Sequential
Gaussian
Simulation.
The
porosity
Ng
o
o
(5.75)
The higher the gravity number, the higher the potential for gravity
segregation in the experiment. If the gravity number is negative, the
gravity segregation will be in the form of gravity override, whereas if the it
is positive, the gravity segregation will be in the form of gravity tonguing.
The density number is defined as
o
o
5-79
(5.76)
The higher the density number, the higher the potential for gravity
segregation. A negative density number correlates with gravity override
whereas a positive density number correlates with gravity tonguing.
All the simulations were performed with UTCHEM, a finite
difference chemical flooding simulator developed at The University of
Texas at Austin. A 3D Cartesian coordinate system was used to simulate
the displacements in a cylindrical core. Figure 5.47 shows how the
rectangular grids were adapted to simulate a cylindrical system. All the
simulations were performed with 40x40x20 grid blocks.
cm/s (0.40 ft/day). Figure 5.48 shows an artist impression of the core
along with the nomenclature used in the core characterization. The core
properties were: L = 10 cm, d = 5 cm, k = 622 md and
= 24%. Figure
5-81
582
5-83
Figure 5.52 shows the permeability field generated for the Berea
sandstone core and used as the porous medium for the numerical
simulation. The parameters of the log normal permeability field are k =
622 md,
0.0975 cm and
0.0031 cm.
584
5-85
586
5-87
Experiment 2
This experiment was conducted in the same Berea sandstone core
and at the same mobility ratio as Experiment 1. However, the gravity
number was reduced from 0.3656 to 0.0180 by increasing the Darcy
velocity from 0.00014 cm/s (0.40 ft/day) to 0.00294 cm/s (8.33 ft/day)
in an effort to eliminate the gravity tonguing observed in Experiment 1.
Figures 5.57 and 5.58 show the solvent concentration images and the
solvent concentration profiles for the experiment. The images of Figure
5.57 appear to show more tonguing than in Experiment 1.
588
5-89
590
5-91
592
Figure 5.62 shows the end piece of the core holder through which
fluid is injected into the core. Fluid is injected as a point source. Radial
grooves are machined on the face of the end piece to assist in
distributing the injected fluid uniformly over the inlet face of the core. It
would appear that at the injection rate of 0.40 ft/day in Experiment 2,
the grooves were effective in distributing the injected fluid over the inlet
face of the core. However, when the rate was increased to 8.33 ft/day,
the grooves became ineffective in distributing the injected fluid over the
inlet face of the core. As a result, the injected fluid was distributed
unevenly over the inlet face with more fluid being injected at the center of
the core than at the periphery of the core .
Figure 5.62. Schematic diagram of end piece of core holder showing fluid
injection hole and grooves.
In order to test the fluid injection hypothesis, the inlet boundary
condition of the simulation model was modified to inject more fluid at the
center than at the periphery of the core as shown in Figure 5.62. Figures
5.63 to 5.65 show comparisons of the results of the simulation with the
modified inlet boundary condition and the experiment. The agreement
between the simulation and the experiment is excellent. The hypothesis
5-93
594
5-95
Experiment 3
This experiment was performed in the same Berea sandstone core
as Experiments 1 and 2 but at an adverse mobility ratio of 98 at the high
Darcy velocity of 0.00294 cm/s (8.33 ft/day). The combination of high
mobility ratio and high injection normally result is viscous fingering as is
evident in Figure 5.66, which shows the solvent concentration images for
this experiment. The solvent concentration profiles are shown in Figure
5.67.
Figures 5.68 to 5.70 compare the results of a preliminary
simulation with the experiment. There is no agreement between the two.
The preliminary simulation was based on a uniform permeability
distribution in the core and a uniform fluid injection at the core inlet.
The simulation was then refined by the using permeability distribution of
Figure 5.52 and the modified inlet boundary condition. More transverse
dispersion (
596
5-97
598
5-99
5100
5-101
5102
Experiment 4
This experiment was performed in a layered Antolini sandstone
core at a favorable mobility ratio of 0.81 at a Darcy velocity of 0.00014
cm/s (0.40ft/day). Figure 5.74 shows the porosity images for sandstone
obtained by NMR. Figures 5.75 and 5.76 show the solvent concentration
images and the solvent concentration profiles for the experiment.
Using the porosity images as guidance, a three-layer permeability
distribution was generated for the sandstone core as shown in Figure
5.77. This distribution was used in the initial simulation of Experiment
4. Figures 5.78 to 5.80 compare the results of the simulation based on
the three-layer model with the experiment. The agreement between the
simulation and the experiment is fair. The permeability field was further
refined into a five-layer model as shown in Figure 5.81. Figures 5.82 to
5.84 show comparisons of the results of the simulation with the fivelayer model with the experiment. The agreement between the simulation
and the experiment is excellent.
5-103
5104
5-105
5106
5-107
5108
5-109
5110
5-111
5112
Experiment 5
This experiment was performed in the same core as Experiment 4
but at an adverse mobility ratio of 11 and a Darcy velocity of 0.00014
cm/s
(0.40
ft/day).
Figures
5.85
and
5.86
show
the
solvent
5.87
to
5.89
show
comparisons
of
the
predicted
5-113
5114
5-115
5116
5-117
Experiment 6
The purpose of Experiment 6 and the accompanying numerical
simulation was to verify a new method for mapping the porosity and
permeability distributions in a heterogeneous core by NMR (Zuluaga et
al., 2000). A layered Antolini sandstone core was used for this
experiment. The core properties are L = 10 cm, d = 5 cm,
= 12.8% and
k
The
constant
C1
was
C1
obtained
4
2
NMR 1
(2.69)
by
calibrating
the
NMR-derived
m2/s2. The
k 180
2
4
NMR 1
(5.77)
Figure 5.90 shows a high resolution porosity image of the core. Dipping
layers are clearly visible in the image. Figure 5.91 shows the porosity
distribution
after
upscaling
the
high
resolution
porosity
data
5118
5-119
5120
is
good.
The
NMR-derived
5-121
porosity
and
permeability
5122
NOMENCLATURE
ax
ay
az
solvent concentration
CD =
Ci
Cj
Dm =
Dd
DL
Do
Dp
erf =
error function
erfc =
gravitational acceleration
Ja
Jd
permeability
mobility ratio
Ng
gravity number
NPe =
Peclet number
density number
Rf
retardation factor
time
tD
dimensionless time
xD
dimensionless distance
longitudinal dispersivity
transverse dispersivity
porosity
fluid mobility
tortuosity
density difference
gradient operator
5-125
Boersma, L., F.T. Lindstrom and M.A. Barlaz: Dispersion at the Field
Scale Resulting from Spatial Variability of the Hydraulic
Conductivity Field, J. Hydrol., 159, No. 3 (1974) 145-67.
Bond, W.J.:
Velocity-Dependent Hydrodynamic Dispersion During
Steady, Unsaturated Soil Water Flow: Experiments, Water
Resources Res., 22 , No. 13, (1986) 1881-89.
Bond, W.J. and D.E. Smiles: Influence of Velocity on Hydrodynamic
Dispersion During Unsteady Soil Water Flow, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
47, No. 3, (1983) 438-41.
Bosma, W.J. and S.E.A.T.M. van der Dee: Dispersion of Continuously
Injected, Non Linearly Adsorbing Solute in Chemically or Physically
Heterogeneous Porous Formations, J. Contam. Hydrol., 18 , No. 3
(1995) 181-98.
Bresler, E. and Dagan, G.:
Solute Transport in Unsaturated
Heterogeneous Soils at Field Scale, II, Applications, Soil Sci. Soc.
Am. J., 43, No. 1 (1979) 467- 72.
Broman, W. H., Jr.: Experimental Verification of A Stability Theory for
Miscible Displacements, MS Thesis, University of Texas at Austin,
December 1985.
Butters, G.L., W.A. Jury and F.F. Ernst: Field Scale Transport of
Bromide in an Unsaturated Soil, 1, Experimental Methodology and
Results, Water Resources Res., 25, No. 7 (1989) 1575-81.
Carslaw, H.S. and Jaeger, J.C. : Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd edition,
Clarendon Press, Oxford (1959).
Cavalero, S.: Visualization of Viscous Fingering in Miscible and Immiscible
Displacements, MS Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, May
1990.
Clark, J.N., Shearin, H.M., Schultz, W.P., Garms, K. and Moore, J.L. :
"Miscible Drive - Its Theory and Application," JPT (June 1958) 1120.
Collins, R.E.: Flow of Fluids Through Porous Materials, Research &
Engineering Consultants Inc. (1990).
Crank, J.: The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed., Clarendon, Oxford,
England (1979).
Cushman, J.H.:
On Diffusion in Fractal Porous Media, Water
Resources Res., 27, No. 4 (1991) 643-44.
Cushman, J.H. and R.T. Ginn: On Dispersion in Fractal Porous Media,
Water Resources Res., 29, No. 10 (1993) 3513-15.
5126
Chemical
5-127
5-129
5-131
Shecaira, F.S.:
Numerical Modeling of Miscible Displacements in
Permeable Media Monitored by Imaging Techniques, PhD
Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, May
1998.
Schulin, R., M.T. van Genuchten, H. Fluhler and P. Ferlin:
An
Experimental Study of Solute Transport in a Stony Field Soil,
Water Resour. Res., 2, No. 9, 1785-95 (1987).
Schwartz, F.W.: Macrodispersion in Porous Media: The Controlling
Factors, Water Resour. Res., 1, No. 4, 743-52 (1977).
Shouse, P.J., T.R. Ellsworth and J.A. Jobes: Steady-State Infiltration as
a function of Measurement Scale, Soil Sci., 157, No. 3, 129-36
(1994).
Tang, D.H., E.O. Frind and E.A. Sudicky: Contaminant Transport in
Fractured Porous Media:
Analytical Solutions for a Single
Fracture, Water Resour. Res., 17, No. 3, 555-64 (1981).
Taylor, G.: Diffusion by Continuous Movements, Proc. London Math
Soc., 20, 196-211 (1981).
Taylor, G.: Dispersion of Soluble Matter in Solvent Flowing Slowly
Through a Tube, Proc. R. Soc. London A, 219, 186-203 (1953).
Tyler, S.W. and S.W. Wheatcraft: Reply to Comment by J.R. Philip on
An Explanation of Scale-Dependent Dispersivity in Heterogeneous
Aquifers Using Concepts of Fractal Geometry, by S.W. Wheatcraft
and S.W. Tyler, Water Resour. Res., 28, No. 5, 1487-90 (1992).
van Genuchten, M.T. and W.J. Alves: Analytical Solutions of the OneDimensional Convective-Dispersive Solute Transport Equation,
Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., 1661 (1992).
van Wesenbeeck, J. and R.G. Kachanoski: Spatial Scale Dependence of
In Situ Solute Transport, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55, No. 1, 3-7
(1991).
Wang, T.T., T.K. Kwei and H.L. Frisch: Diffusion in Glassy Polymers,
III, J. Polymer Sci., Part A 2, 7, 2019-28 (1969).
Wheatcraft, S.W. and S.W. Tyler: An Explanation of Scale-Dependent
Dispersivity in Heterogeneous Aquifers Using Concepts of Fractal
Geometry, Water Resour. Res., 24, No. 4, 566-78 (1988).
Yeh, G.T.: A Lagrangean-Eulerian Method with Zoomable Hidden FineMesh Approach to Solving Advection-Dispersion Equations, Water
Resour. Res., 26, No. 6, 1133-44 (1990).
5132
5-133
PROBLEMS
5.1. A laboratory core, which is 6 cm in diameter and 40 cm in length,
has a porosity of 0.35. The core is initially saturated with water. A
tracer is then injected continuously into the core at the rate of 1000
cm3/hour. The effluent data shown in Table 5.4 were recorded at
the outlet end of the core. C/Co is the relative tracer concentration.
Determine the dispersion coefficient of the core.
Table 5.4. Effluent Data for Tracer Test of Problem 5.1.
Time
(hour)
C/Co
0.35
0.075
0.37
0.215
0.385
0.37
0.396
0.5
0.41
0.65
0.43
0.83
0.44
0.89
0.46
0.96
5.2. Table 5.5 gives the data for a one-dimensional core tracer test.
Determine the Peclet number for the tracer test.
Table 5.5. Data for Problem 5.2.
PV
(tD)
1 tD
tD
CD
0.60
0.516
0.010
0.65
0.434
0.015
0.70
0.359
0.037
0.80
0.224
0.066
0.90
0.105
0.300
1.00
0.000
0.502
Injected
5134
1.10
-0.095
0.685
1.20
-0.183
0.820
1.30
-0.263
0.906
1.40
-0.338
0.988
1.50
-0.408
0.997
C/Co
(cm)
(%)
48.2
0.8
49.7
2.2
51.5
3.5
53.6
9.5
55.4
21.7
57.2
50.3
59.3
78.0
61.3
94.5
63.2
94.5
65.4
98.7
68.2
98.7
73.4
100
=
=
=
35%
0.1
1.0 cp
Fluid density
Gravitational acceleration
1.0 gm/cm3
981cm/s2
1 atmosphere
=
1.0133x106 dynes/cm2
a.
Calculate the dispersivity of the porous medium and state its
units.
b.
Calculate the permeability of the porous medium and state its
units.
Problem 3 (15 points)
A tracer test was conducted in a long core to determine the dispersivity of
a porous medium using a tracer that had the same density and the same
viscosity as the displaced liquid. The tracer test was imaged by CT at t =
50 minutes from the beginning of the test. The interstitial velocity for the
test was 1.6 cm/minute. Figure 3 shows the 0.9 and 0.1 tracer
concentration contours inside the porous medium obtained by imaging.
a.
Calculate the dispersivity of the porous medium and state its
units.
b.
c.
5136
concentration
profiles
to
be
imaged
by
x-ray
computed
tomography (CT scanning). Probes are installed at the inlet and outlet
5-137
a. Sketch the solvent concentration profile you would expect to see from the CT
scanning after injecting 0.5 pore volume of the solvent. Show the inlet and outlet
ends of the core on your sketch as well as the critical values of solvent concentration.
Do your sketch on Figure 2.
b. Sketch the graphs of solvent concentration versus dimensionless time you expect
from the probes at the inlet and outlet ends of the core. Superimpose the two graphs
so that one can make a qualitative comparison of the two. Please label your graphs
with inlet and outlet. Do your sketches on Figure 3.
c. Other than the absolute permeability, what transport property of the porous medium
and fluids can be estimated from this experiment?
d. Predict the solvent concentration at the outlet end of the core at t = 108 minutes,
given:
L = 30 cm
3
q = 50 cm /hour
2
A = 20 cm
= 0.15
DL = 400x10
6.
2
cm /s
4.
was observed to arrive at the outlet end of the core after 0.9 hour from the start of
injection. Other data about the test are:
Length of sandpack
30 cm
Diameter of sandpack
10 cm
3
1000 cm /hour
35%
Hydraulic gradient
0.1
Fluid viscosity
1.0 cp
Fluid density
3
1.0 gm/cm
Gravitational acceleration
981cm/s
1 atmosphere
6
2
1.0133x10 dynes/cm
a.
Calculate the dispersivity of the porous medium. Please state the units of your
answer.
5-139
6.
b.
Calculate the permeability of the porous medium. Please state the units of
your
answer.
2.
C/Co
0.25
0.50
0.75
5140
5-141
CHAPTER 6
In some oil
reservoirs, at some stage of depletion, water, oil and gas may occupy the pore
space.
When more than one fluid occupies the pore space of a porous medium,
new set of problems arise.
Interfacial
forces (surface forces) between the immiscible fluids and between the fluids
and the rock surface come into play.
dimensions, capillarity plays a role. Interfaces separate the fluids within the
pores giving rise to differences in fluid pressure between the phases (capillary
pressure) and differences in the flow capacity (relative permeability) of the
rock and fluids. Capillarity also ensures that an immiscible displacement can
never be complete. There is always a residual saturation of the displaced fluid
that is trapped by capillarity. Further, the rock surface can show a marked
affinity for one of the fluids. Such an affinity is characterized by the concept of
wettability. Interfacial phenomena and wettability are presented in this
6-1
attractions of the fluid particles at the surface as shown in Figure 6.1. The
force per unit length (
6-2
experiment) that the reversible work required to create a new interface is given
by
W
where
(6.1)
da
is surface
(interfacial) tension and da is the increase in area. The reversible work shown
in Eq.(6.1) corresponds to a free energy quantity. It is apparent from Eq.(6.1)
that surface (interfacial) tension also can be viewed as free surface energy per
unit area with units of erg per square centimeter.
Because a system at
6-3
Ss
(6.2)
P
T (C)
(dynes/cm)
20
25
20
25
20
20
72.8
72.0
28.88
28.22
28.43
26.9
20
20
20
22.39
21.8
17.01
Generally, the
6-4
2.
In general,
through the concept of the parachor. The parachor for a pure substance is
defined as
M
L
where
1
4
(6.3)
g
is the
3
g is the saturated vapor density in g/cm . Parachor has definite
values for specific atoms and structures. Parachors are predicted from the
structure of the molecules or can be calculated for pure substances and
mixtures from surface tension measurements at atmospheric pressure. The
parachors for pure substances are given in Table 6.2.
Correlations for
parachors with molecular weight are shown in Figures 6.3 and 6.4. The
saturated liquid and vapor densities for various liquids are given in Figure
6.5.
6-6
4
L
(6.4)
Table 4.2. Parachors for Computing Surface and Interfacial Tensions (Katz et
al., 1959)
Constituent
Parachor
Methane
Ethane
Propane
i-Butane
n-Butane
i-Pentane
n-Pentane
n-Hexane
n-Heptane
n-Octane
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Carbon dioxide
77.0
108.0
150.3
181.5
181.5
225.0
231.5
271.0
312.5
351.5
34 (approx)
41 (approx)
78
6-7
6-8
6-9
6-10
referred to as the excess interfacial free energy. The specific excess interfacial
free energy is dimensionally equivalent and is numerically equal to the
interfacial tension. Like surface tension, the unit of measurement of
interfacial tension is dynes/cm (or ergs/cm2).
Consider butanol (C4H9OH) with a surface tension of 24 dynes/cm in
contact with water (H2O) with a surface tension of 72 dynes/cm. What will be
the interfacial tension between the two liquids?
6-11
thereby reducing the interfacial tension between the water and the isopentanol. When 25% by weight of ethanol is added, the interfacial tension is
reduced to zero. The system then becomes miscible and forms a single phase.
T (C)
n-Hexane
n-Octane
Carbon disulphide
Carbon tetrachloride
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromobenzene
Benzene
Benzene
Nitrobenzene
Ethyl ether
20
20
20
20
25
25
20
25
20
20
6-12
(dynes/cm)
51.0
50.8
48.0
45.1
43.7
38.1
35.0
34.71
26.0
10.7
n-Octanol
n-Hexanol
Aniline
n-Pentanol
Ethyl acetate
Isobutanol
n-Butanol
n-Butanol
20
25
20
25
30
20
20
25
8.5
6.8
5.85
4.4
2.9
2.1
1.8
1.6
The
where
tension and
(6.5)
o is the original interfacial
the interfacial tension between oil and water in order to improve oil recovery.
The interfacial tensions between reservoir water and crude oils have
been measured for a number of reservoirs and found to range from 15 to 35
dynes/cm at 70 F, 8 to 25 dynes/cm at 100 F, and 8 to 19 dynes/cm at 130
F.
6-13
i N
i
i 1
where
xi
ML
yi
(6.6)
Mg
i is the
Non-Wetting
Phase
Conditions
Contact
Angle ()
Interfacial
Tension
(dynes/cm)
Brine
Brine
Brine
Brine
Oil
Gas
Oil
Oil
Gas
Gas
Gas
Mercury
Reservoir
Laboratory
Laboratory
Reservoir
Reservoir
Laboratory
30
30
0
0
0
140
30
48
72
50
4
480
6-14
f1
cos ,
nw
(6.7)
,v
nw
nw
x1
x2
0
1
x3
x4
cos
1
1
x3
(6.8)
x4
(6.9)
nw
w
v
cos
(6.10)
v
cos
w
or
wetting, is known as the capillary number. It is the ratio of the viscous to the
capillary force. Thus,
6-15
v
cos
w
Nc
or
(6.11)
The functional relationship between the residual oil saturation and the two
dimensionless groups can be written as
Sor
nw
f2
v
cos
(6.12)
Sor
f3
v
cos
(6.13)
1 Sor S wi
1 S wi
f4
v
cos
(6.14)
and
displaced
by
increasing
the
capillary
number
of
the
and v .
lowering the interfacial tension between the wetting and nonwetting phases
with a surfactant. Interfacial tensions less that 0.1 dyne/cm can be achieved.
In the limit, if the interfacial tension could be lowered to zero, the fluids would
become miscible and no residual saturation would be left behind. Of course,
in a practical process, the interfacial tension cannot be reduced to zero except
in a miscible process.
Consider the case of a nonwetting fluid displacing a wetting fluid, such
as a waterflood of an oil wet reservoir. The capillary desaturation curve is
similar to that for the residual nonwetting fluid except that the critical value
of the capillary number is higher. It should be noted that the numerical
values of the residual saturations given in Figure 6.7 are for illustrative
purposes. It should not be assumed that waterfloods always have a residual
oil saturation of 30%, nor should one infer from the figure that it is more
efficient to displace a wetting fluid with a nonwetting fluid. The residual oil
saturation can be greater or less than 30% depending on such factors as the
mobility ratio of the displacement and the properties of the porous medium
such as pore structure, pore size distribution, permeability and wettability to
name a few. Also, in general, it is more difficult for a nonwetting fluid to
displace a wetting fluid than for a wetting fluid to displace a nonwetting fluid.
6-17
0.4
w
o
6-18
. The inclusion
Figure 6.9. Capillary desaturation data with the effect of viscosity ratio
included (Abrams, 1975).
6-19
6-20
Capillary Force
Force Up
(6.15)
2 r cos
r 2h
Force Down
nw
(6.16)
The downward force also can be expressed in terms of the pressures on the
opposite sides of the meniscus as
Pr essure Force
r 2 Pnw
Force Down
Pw
(6.17)
2 cos
r
nw
(6.18)
rh
nw
2 cos
The surface tension,
(6.19)
6-21
nw
rh
(6.20)
2
By measuring r, h and
1
wg
For water at 25 C,
= 72 dynes/cm,
rh
2
(6.21)
72
1x981
The significance of the capillary length is that when dealing with a system
1
and capillary effect dominates the process. For example, at the pore scale
where the characteristic length is of the order of microns, capillary effect
dominates gravity effect.
Let us define another constant for the capillary rise experiment as
a2
2
wg
(6.22)
a2
rh
6-22
(6.23)
Some famous scientists have studied the capillary rise experiment and have
proposed more elaborate equations to describe the capillary rise than
Eq.(6.23). Jurin (1718) gives the capillary rise equation as
a2
where the
r h
r
3
(6.24)
r
corrects for the volume of the liquid in the spherical meniscus.
3
a2
rh 1
r
3h
0.1111r 2
h2
0.0741r 3
h3
(6.25)
where the last two terms on the right hand side correct for deviations of the
meniscus from sphericity. Rayleigh (1915) further refined Eq.(6.25) as
a2
rh 1
r
3h
0.1288r 2
h2
0.1312r 3
h3
(6.26)
For our purpose, we will use the simple version of the capillary rise equation,
Eq.(6.23).
Equating Eqs.(6.15), (6.16) and (6.17) gives
Pnw
Pw
2 cos
r
nw
(6.27)
Eq.(6.27) gives the excess pressure, (Pnw - Pw), across the curved interface
between the wetting and nonwetting phases in terms of the pertinent
variables of the capillary rise experiment. This excess pressure is known as
the capillary pressure (Pc) and will be the subject of Chapter 7. As shown in
6-23
Eq.(6.27), the excess pressure for the capillary rise experiment is positive,
which means that the pressure in the nonwetting phase is higher than that in
the wetting phase. Eq.(6.27) can now be written as
Pc
Pnw
Pw
2 cos
r
nw
(6.28)
The
principle of the method is based on the fact that the size of the liquid drop is
proportional to surface tension of the liquid. The size of the drop is reached
when the surface tension can no longer support its weight.
To a first
approximation,
Wideal
where Wideal is the
(6.29)
2 r
r is the external
sequence of shapes for a drop that detaches from a tip. The detached drop
leaves behind some liquid residue. Thus, the actual weight of the drop which
is what is measured is less than the ideal weight.
Eq.(6.29) is modified as
Wactual
Wideal f
2 r f
6-24
(6.30)
r
1
V3
where V is the volume of the drop. Table 6.5 shows the correction factors for
various
r
1
V3
6-25
Table 6.5. Correction Factors for Sessile Drop Method (Adamson, 1982).
gd e2
(6.31)
H
where
de
and g is the gravitational acceleration. The constant H is
ds
6-26
Ring Method
The ring method of determining surface or interfacial tension depends
on measuring the force required to pull the ring free of the interface as shown
in Figure 6.14. Theoretically, the surface or interfacial tension is given by
F
2L
where
(6.32)
ring free of the interface and L is the circumference of the ring. The factor of 2
accounts for the fact that there are two surfaces around the ring. In practice,
corrections are needed to account for the mass of liquid lifted by the ring in
breaking through the interface as shown in Figure 6.15. Such corrections are
made available with the instrument. Figure 6.16 shows a typical instrument,
known as the du Nouy tensiometer, that employs the ring method for surface
or interfacial tension determination.
6-27
6-28
6-29
6-30
1
4
2 3
(6.33)
where
is the density
6.3 WETTABILITY
6.3.1 Definition
Wettability is a tendency for one fluid to spread on or adhere to a solid
surface in the presence of other immiscible fluids. The fluid that spreads or
adheres to the surface is known as the wetting fluid. In a petroleum reservoir,
the solid surface is the reservoir rock which may be sandstone, limestone, or
dolomite, together with cementing material. The fluids are water, oil and gas.
Normally, either water or oil is the wetting phase. Gas is always a nonwetting
phase.
6-31
6-32
os is the solid-oil
Three
ws is the
is measured through the water (the more dense fluid). The contact angle is a
measure of the wettability of the solid.
At equilibrium, the interfacial tensions are related by the Young - Dupre
equation obtained by considering horizontal equilibrium of the point of
contact of the interfacial tensions. For Figure 6.19, this equation is given by
os
ws
ow
cos
6-33
(6.34)
The free surface energies for the oil-solid and water-solid interfaces
cannot be measured readily. However, their difference can be determined by
measuring the oil-water interfacial tension and the contact angle.
This
1.
If the free surface energies for the oil-solid ( os) and the water-solid
( ws) interfaces are equal, the left side of Eq.(6.34) is zero. Since the
oil-water interfacial ( ow) tension is nonzero, cos on the right side of
Eq.(6.34) must be zero, giving a contact angle of 90. A contact angle of
90 means that the solid has no preferential wettability for the oil or the
water. This is a situation of neutral or intermediate wettability.
2.
If
ws
os then
wet. When the oil, water and solid are first brought in contact, water
will advance and spread on the solid surface, displacing the oil until an
equilibrium contact angle is attained according Eq.(6.34).
6-34
During
spreading of the water, the free energy of the system is reduced since
ws
3.
If
4.
ws
os then
= 0.
6-35
6-36
to
evaluate
reservoir
wettability.
The
contact
angle
wet
mineral
surface
become
preferentially
oil
wet
over
time.
Accordingly, the contact angle test uses reservoir oil and brine and a pure,
clean mineral surface which is known to be preferentially water wet at the
outset. In the absence of reservoir brine, synthetic brine is used in the test
since the surface active fluid is the oil and not in the brine. The solids
normally used in the test to represent reservoir rock are pure quartz (silica)
for a sandstone reservoir, pure calcite for a limestone reservoir and pure
dolomite crystal for a dolomite reservoir. These pure minerals are known to
be preferentially water wet initially. If the oil contains surface active agents,
then these will adsorb on the mineral surface over time and increase the
degree of oil wetness. This change in the wettability of the surface can be
observed and quantified by measuring the contact angle over time until an
equilibrium contact angle is obtained.
6-37
Two contact angles are normally measured: the advancing and receding
contact angles.
greater than the receding contact angle. Normally, it is the advancing contact
angle that is reported as the contact angle in a wettability test.
Figure 6.23 shows the results of a contact angle test.
interesting observations can be made.
Several
Eventually, after
6-39
The
representative of actual reservoir mineralogy. (3) The test can be very long and
requires extreme cleanliness and inertness of the test system. (4) There is
evidence that the contact angle is affected by which fluid was first in contact
with the solid.
Amott Wettability Test
The Amott wettability index is obtained by a combined imbibitiondisplacement test on a reservoir core sample using refined oil and synthetic
brine. After the reservoir core sample has been flushed with brine to residual
oil saturation and evacuated to remove gas, it is then subjected to the
following tests:
1.
The core is immersed in oil (e.g., kerosene) and the volume of brine
displaced by the imbibition of oil is measured after 20 hours in an
imbibition cell as shown in Figure 6.24.
2.
3.
The core is immersed in brine and the volume of oil displaced by the
imbibition of brine is measured after 20 hours.
4.
The core is centrifuged under brine and the additional oil displaced by
centrifuging is measured.
6-40
The wettability indices of water (WIw) and oil (WIo) are calculated as follows:
WI w
WI o
The Amott wettability indices and dimensionless numbers that range from 0
to 1. If the rock is preferentially water-wet, WIo will be 0 and WIw > 0. The
greater the degree of water wetness, the closer will WIw be to 1. Similarly, if
6-41
the rock is preferentially oil wet, WIw will be 0 and WIo > 0. The greater the
degree of oil wetness, the closer will WIo be to 1. For a rock of intermediate or
neutral wettability, WIw and WIo will be 0 or close to 0.
difference WI w WI o
Sometimes, the
6-42
Iw
log10
A1
A2
(6.37)
where A1 and A2 are the areas under the capillary pressure curves shown in
each figure.
The
area
under
capillary
pressure
curve
represents
the
A1
, is a measure of the
A2
6-43
6-44
6-45
intermediate wettability and those with contact angles from 105 to 180 were
classified as preferentially oil wet.
The results showed that 27% of the reservoirs tested were preferentially
water wet, 66% were preferentially oil wet and the remaining 7% were of
intermediate wettability.
preferentially water wet, 50% were preferentially oil wet and 7% were of
intermediate wettability. On the other hand, 84% of the carbonate reservoirs
were preferentially oil wet, 8% were preferentially water wet and 8% were of
intermediate wettability. It would appear from the results of this study that
carbonates are more likely to be preferentially oil wet than preferentially water
wet. However, this assertion cannot be generalized because the 55 reservoirs
used in this study were not obtained by random sampling. A random sample
of reservoirs would be needed if the results of the wettability tests are to be
given statistical significance.
A similar contact angle study by Chiligarian and Chen (1983) on 161
carbonate reservoirs showed 80% of the reservoirs to be preferentially oil wet,
8% to be preferentially water wet and 12% to be of intermediate wettability.
These results are consistent with those of Treibel et al.(1972).
6.3.4 Effect of Wettability on Rock -Fluid Interactions
Wettability has a profound effect on multiphase rock-fluid interactions.
Wettability affects (a) the microscopic fluid distribution at the pore scale in the
porous medium, (b) the magnitude of the irreducible water saturation, (c) the
efficiency of an immiscible displacement in the porous medium, (d) the
residual oil saturation, (e) the capillary pressure curve of the porous medium,
(f) the relative permeability curves of the porous medium and (g) the electrical
properties of the porous medium.
Microscopic Fluid Distribution at the Pore Scale
6-46
schematically in Figure 6.27 for water wet and oil wet porous media. For the
water wet medium, at the initial state, water being the wetting phase coats the
grain surface and occupy the nooks and crannies of the medium. Oil, being
the nonwetting phase occupies the center of the pores and is surrounded by
water. After waterfooding, the residual oil globules occupy the center of the
pores. For the oil wet medium, oil being the wetting phase coats the grain
surface and occupy the nooks and crannies of the medium. The water, being
the nonwetting phase occupies the center of the pores and is surrounded by
oil. After waterflooding, the water occupies the center of the pores and the
residual oil wets the grain surface and occupies the nooks and crannies of the
medium. These microscopic fluid arrangements have implications for the
nature of the end point relative permeabilities of a water wet rock and an oil
wet rock.
Effect of Wettability on Irreducible Water Saturation
It has been observed that the irreducible water saturation in an oil wet
reservoir rock tends to be less than in a water wet reservoir rock. Craig (1971)
gives the following rule-of-thumb for irreducible water saturation for water
wet and oil wet reservoirs. For water wet reservoirs, the irreducible water
saturation is usually greater than 20 to 25% whereas for oil wet reservoirs it
is generally less than 15% and frequently less than 10% of the pore volume.
6-47
Table 6.6. Archie Saturation Exponent in Oil Wet Rocks (Mungan and Moore,
1968).
S w1.92 and I
exponents of 1.92 and 1.61, respectively. The data for the preferentially oil wet
cores separated into two distinct trends described by the equations
saturation exponents of 12.27 and 8.09. The separation of the oil wet data
was attributed to differences in the pore size distributions of the cores.
6-49
microscopic displacement of oil from a water wet medium and an oil wet
medium at the pore scale. In the water wet medium, the injected water is
imbibed into the medium along the pore walls in a manner that enhances the
oil displacement efficiency. The residual oil is trapped at the center of the
large pores. In the oil wet medium, the injected water channels through the
large pores leaving behind considerable residual oil in the small pores, at the
solid contacts and as coatings on the solid grains.
picture, it is easy to see that the waterflood efficiency will be higher in the
water wet medium than in the oil wet medium everything else being equal.
The higher waterflood efficiency of the water wet rock compared to the
oil wet rock seen at the pore scale manifests itself at the macroscopic scale
(core scale) as well.
6-51
6-52
Peters
and
Hardham
(1989)
have
conducted
similar
waterflood
first saturated with the same viscous silicon-based oil and the oil was then
displaced by the same brine to simulate a waterflood at the same unfavorable
mobility ratio as in Experiment 1. Although the wettabilities of the sandpacks
were not measured directly, it is believed that the first sandpack would
behave as a water wet system whereas the second sandpack would behave as
an oil wet system over the short time scale of the experiments.
Both
6-54
6-55
6-56
6-57
6-58
6-59
6-60
6-61
Figure 6.33. Water saturation images for a waterflood in an oil wet sandpack
at a viscosity ratio of 91: (A) tD = 0.05, (B) tD = 0.10, (C ) tD = 0.25, (D) tD =
0.50, (E) tD = 1.0, (F) tD = 2.0, (G) tD = 3.0 (Peters and Hardham, 1989).
6-62
Figure 6.35. Water saturation profiles for a waterflood in an oil wet sandpack.
6-63
dU
(6.38)
dQ dW
heat
input into the system and dW is the work done by the system. For an
equilibrium system, infinitesimal changes are reversible so that the reversible
work is given by
dW
PdV
(6.39)
da
dQ TdS
Substitution of Eqs.(6.39) and (6.40) into Eq.(6.38) gives for a closed system,
dU
TdS
PdV
(6.41)
da
dU
TdS PdV
da
dni
(6.42)
i 1
the
total
U
a
(6.43)
S ,V , ni
(6.44)
dA dU TdS SdT
(6.45)
dA
SdT
PdV
da
i N
i
dni
(6.46)
i 1
We may obtain the interfacial tension from Eq.(6.46) in terms of the Helmholtz
free energy of the system as
A
a
(6.47)
T ,V , ni
A PV
U TS
PV
6-65
H TS
(6.48)
(6.49)
dG VdP SdT
da
dni
(6.50)
i 1
We may obtain the interfacial tension from Eq.(6.50) in terms of Gibbs free
energy of the system as
G
a
(6.51)
T , P , ni
6-66
(6.52)
Let the interface move to the right by a small distance dx. The change in the
Helmholtz free energy of the system as the interfacial areas change is given by
dA
A
dasw
asw
A
daso
aso
A
dawo
awo
(6.53)
6-67
(6.54)
dasw
(6.55)
daso
2 rdx
(6.56)
dawo
Also, from the geometry of Figure 6.36,
where r is the radius of the pore. The interfacial forces are given in terms of
the Helmholtz free energy by Eq.(6.47). Substituting Eqs.(6.47), (6.54), (6.55)
and (6.56) into Eq.(6.53) gives the change in Helmholtz free energy of the
system as
dA
dx
2 r
so
sw
(6.57)
so
sw
so
sw
wo
cos
(6.58)
wo
cos
(6.59)
The right side of Eq.(5.59) is a positive number. The left side of Eq.(6.59) is
larger than this positive number. When these facts are applied to Eq.(6.57),
we see that the change in the Helmholtz free energy during the displacement
is negative. This means that the Helmholtz free energy will decrease as the
nonwetting phase is displaced by the wetting phase. This is a favored
displacement. In fact, the displacement will occur spontaneously if given the
opportunity to do so. This is the origin of spontaneous imbibition, which
6-68
Feffective
dA
dx
(6.60)
dasw
(6.61)
daso
(6.62)
dawo
2 r *dx
6-69
(6.63)
where r* is the radius from the center of the pore to the thin wetting phase
film on the surface of the pore. Substituting Eqs.(6.47), (6.61), (6.62) and
(6.63) into Eq.(6.53) gives the change in the Helmholtz free energy of the
system as
dA
dx
2 r
(6.64)
wo
Eq.(6.64) shows that the Helmholtz free energy of the system increases during
the displacement. This is not a favored displacement. Thus, the displacement
will not occur spontaneously. It must be forced by pumping.
The effective
Feffective
dA
dx
(6.65)
6-70
NOMENCLATURE
a
interfacial area
force
gravitational acceleration
enthalpy
molecular weight
Mg =
ML =
ni
moles of component i
Nc
capillary number
pressure
Pc
capillary pressure
Pnw =
Pw
heat
6-71
oil recovery
entropy
Ss
surface entropy
Sor =
temperature
internal energy
Darcy velocity
volume
work
xi
yi
os
ow
ws
contact angle
nw
nw
parachor
spreading pressure
6-72
6-75
6-76
CHAPTER 7
CAPILLARY PRESSURE
7.1 DEFINITION OF CAPILLARY PRESSURE
When two immiscible fluids are in contact, there is a pressure
discontinuity between the two fluids which depends upon the curvature of the
interface separating the two fluids. This pressure difference or excess
pressure is known as the capillary pressure. The pressure on the concave side
of the interface is higher than that on the convex side of the interface. Figure
7.1 shows a curve interface between to immisicible fluids labeled 1 and 2. The
pressure P2 is greater than P1. The capillary pressure is given by Laplace
equation (sometimes referred to as Young-Laplace equation) as
Pc
P2
P1
1
r1
1
r2
(7.1)
7-1
Curvature
1
r1
1
r2
(7.2)
7-2
x dx
y dy
xy
xdy
ydx dxdy
xdy
ydx
(7.3)
xdy
(7.4)
ydx
P2
(7.5)
P1 xydz
P1 xydz
xdy
ydx
(7.6)
x dx
r1 dz
x
r1
(7.7)
y dy
r2 dz
y
r2
(7.8)
7-3
Pc
P2
1
r1
P1
1
r2
(7.1)
1 1
2 r1
1
r2
(7.9)
Pc
2
rm
(7.10)
Figure 7.2. Fluid interface in the planes of the principal radii of curvature.
7-4
Pc
2
r
(7.11)
For a soap bubble in air, r1 = r2 = r, the radius of the bubble. The capillary
pressure or excess pressure is given by
Pc
4
r
(7.12)
where a factor of 2 has been incorporated to account for the two gas-liquid
interfaces of a soap bubble. For a flat interface, r1 = r2 =
capillary pressure is zero. If the two immiscible fluids are in contact with a
solid surface, the interface will intersect the solid at an equilibrium contact
angle
Figure 7.3 for the capillary rise experiment. Laplace equation holds at the
interface. Assuming the interface lies on a sphere as shown in the figure, then
r1 = r2 = r/cos
pressure is given by
Pc
1
r1
1
r2
cos
r
7-5
cos
r
2 cos
r
(7.13)
Pc
cos
1
r1
7-6
1
r2
(7.14)
In this case, the principal radii of curvature are on opposite sides of the
interface. By sign convention, one radius will be positive and the other will be
negative.
If the wetting fluid saturation in the pendular ring is reduced, r1 and r2 will be
reduced. However, r1 will be reduced more than r2 as the wetting phase
recedes into the corners of the contact of the grains. As a result, the capillary
pressure will increase. If the wetting fluid saturation is increased, r1 and r2
will increase and the capillary pressure will decrease. Therefore, an inverse
relationship exists between the capillary pressure and the wetting phase
saturation for a porous medium. Low wetting phase saturation corresponds
7-7
2 cos
r wg
0.1468
cm
r
(7.15)
Pc
2 cos
r
144
dynes / cm 2
r
(7.16)
7-8
Figure 7.5. Capillary rise experiment for a bundle of capillary tubes medium.
Table 7.1. Capillary Pressure versus Wetting Phase Saturation for Bundle of
Capillary Tubes Model.
Radius
Pc
Pc
Pc
Volume
Volume
Water
( m)
(dynes/cm2
(atm)
(psi)
cm
(cm3)
Fraction
Saturation
)
0.00
1.000
100
14400.0
0.014
0.209
14.68
0.0046
0.182
0.818
90
16000.0
0.016
0.232
16.31
0.0042
0.164
0.655
80
18000.0
0.018
0.261
18.35
0.0037
0.145
0.509
70
20571.4
0.020
0.298
20.97
0.0032
0.127
0.382
60
24000.0
0.024
0.348
24.46
0.0028
0.109
0.273
50
28800.0
0.028
0.418
29.36
0.0023
0.091
0.182
40
36000.0
0.036
0.522
36.70
0.0018
0.073
0.109
30
48000.0
0.047
0.696
48.93
0.0014
0.055
0.055
20
72000.0
0.071
1.044
73.39
0.0009
0.036
0.018
10
144000.0
0.142
2.088
146.79
0.0005
0.018
0.000
7-9
0.0254
Figures 7.6 and 7.7 show the capillary pressure versus wetting phase
saturation for this idealized medium. In Figure 7.6, the capillary pressure is
presented as height in cm above the free water level whereas in Figure 7.7,
the capillary pressure is given in psi. Both presentations are valid and can be
used for different purposes. The presentation in Figure 7.6 gives the water
saturation distribution as a function of the height above the free water level.
This type of presentation can be used to determine the water saturation
distribution in a petroleum reservoir starting from the free water level at or
below the oil water contact to the top of the reservoir. The presentation in
Figure 7.7 is useful for calculating pore size distribution.
The capillary pressure versus saturation relationship for the idealized
porous medium shown in Figures 7.6 and 7.7 captures the general trend of
capillary pressure curves for porous media. The features include a non-zero
displacement pressure at a wetting phase saturation of 1 and the inverse
relationship between capillary pressure and wetting phase saturation
mentioned previously. The capillary pressure curves have a stair-case shape
in this case because of the limited number and size of the capillary tubes
used in the experiment. The curve will approach a smooth curve if more tubes
are used and the differences in the tube diameters are made small. The only
limitation of the capillary pressure curves for the bundle of capillary tube
model is the absence of an irreducible wetting phase saturation. There is no
possibility of trapping an irreducible saturation for a model consisting of
straight and isolated capillary tubes.
7-10
Figure 7.6. Capillary pressure expressed as height of water above the free
water level versus wetting phase saturation for a bundle of capillary tubes
medium.
Figure 7.7. Capillary pressure in psi versus wetting phase saturation for a
bundle of capillary tubes medium.
7-11
Figure 7.8 shows capillary rise experiments for two porous media
having different grain sizes (pore sizes). The wetting phase will rise higher in
the finer grain porous medium than in the courser grain medium. Such
experiments are widely used in soil science to determine the capillary
pressure curve (referred to as water retention curve or matric suction head in
soil science) for unconsolidated soils. The soil, which is packed in a tube is
dipped into water and allowed to sit for several days or weeks to achieve
capillary equilibrium. The tube often is instrumented to measure the
resistivity of the medium in order to calculate the water saturation along the
column by Archie's equation. The capillary pressure is calculated as height of
water above the free water level as was done in the bundle of capillary tube
model.
Figure 7.8. Capillary rise experiments for two porous media of different grain
sizes.
7-12
= 0), is
Since the
wettability preference of the rock for the water is less at a contact angle of 75
than at 0, less work is required to desaturate the rock. Therefore, the
capillary pressure that needs to be applied to desaturate the rock will be less
at a contact angle of 75 than at 0 at any saturation level.
7-14
Radius
Length
Volume
Fractiona
Pc
Pc
Pc
Water
(dynes/cm2
(atm)
(psi)
Saturation
l
Tube #
( m)
( m)
(cm3)
Volume
)
1
10
6.283E-
0.5747
144000
0.142
2.088
0.4253
0.3678
360000
0.355
5.221
0.0575
0.0575
1440000
1.421
20.884
0.0000
10
2
4.021E10
20
6.283E11
1.093E09
7-15
7-16
This
If the rock does not have a strong wettability preference for the
initially saturating fluid, then the displacement pressure will be zero. If the
rock has a strong preference for the displacing fluid, then no pressure is
required to initiate the displacement because it will occur spontaneously. In
this case, the capillary pressure will start at the initial fluid saturation of less
than 1. As the pressure of the non-wetting phase is increased, smaller and
smaller pores are invaded by the non-wetting fluid. Eventually, the wetting
phase becomes discontinuous and can no longer be displaced from the
medium by increasing the capillary pressure.
Therefore, an irreducible
7-17
saturation is a function of the grain size (pore size), the wettability of the
medium and the interfacial tension between the wetting and non-wetting
fluids.
What information does the capillary pressure curve for a reservoir rock
provide about the rock? If one reservoir rock has a higher permeability than
another, we know that the higher permeability rock will permit faster fluid
flow through it, everything else being equal, than the lower permeability rock.
Thus, the higher permeability rock is more desirable than the lower
permeability rock as a petroleum reservoir rock. If one reservoir rock has a
higher porosity than another, we know that the higher porosity rock will store
more reserves than the lower porosity rock.
7-18
rock is a more desirable reservoir rock than the lower porosity rock. If one
rock has a higher capillary pressure at the same wetting phase saturation
than another, what can we say about the rocks? Is the rock with the higher
capillary pressure curve more desirable or less desirable as a petroleum
reservoir rock than the rock with the lower capillary pressure curve?
Figure 7.13 shows the drainage capillary pressure curves for four rocks:
A, B, C and D. Rock A has the least displacement pressure. Therefore, it has
the largest pores connected to the surface.
wetting phase saturation, indicating that it has relatively larger grains and
pores than the other rocks. Rock B has a higher displacement pressure than
A. Therefore, it has smaller pores than A. The capillary pressure curve at the
high wetting phase saturations is relatively flat, indicating good sorting. Rock
B has a higher irreducible wetting phase saturation than A, which is
consistent with its finer grains and pores. Rock C is even more fine grained
than B because of its higher displacement pressure. The shape of its capillary
pressure curve shows that a higher capillary pressure is required at each
wetting phase saturation to desaturate the rock. This means that C has a
wider pore size distribution than A and B.
has a higher irreducible water saturation than B, which is consistent with its
finer grains and pores.
sorted and would be a very poor reservoir rock. This observation is based on
its very high displacement pressure, very steep capillary pressure curve and
very high irreducible wetting phase saturation. Without being told, one can
easily infer that this rock is essentially made of clay.
7-19
7-20
From Laplace
equation,
Pc
Pc
cos
lab
lab
(7.17)
reservoir
(7.18)
rm
cos
reservoir
rm
Pc
reservoir
Pc
cos
lab
cos
(7.19)
reservoir
lab
It is often necessary to
average the capillary pressure data for cores from the same reservoir believed
7-21
to have the same pore structure in order to obtain one capillary pressure
curve that can be used for reservoir performance analysis. This averaging can
be done using the Leverett J-function, which is a dimensionless capillary
pressure function (Leverett, 1941).
The Leverett J-function can be derived by dimensional analysis as
follows. The capillary pressure curve of a porous medium is a function of
several variables as shown in Eq.(7.20).
k
f S w , , cos , ,
Pc
nw
(7.20)
is a
dimensionless pore structure function that accounts for such things as pore
size distribution, tortuosity, cementation and dead end pores,
porosity,
is the
nw
is the
cos
x1
x2
w
nw
x3
Pcx4
dimensionless constant
(7.21)
Carrying out the dimensional analysis yields the following solution to the
dimensional analysis problem:
7-22
cos
k
w
nw
x1
x2
x3
x4
Pc
1
1
x3
1
0
1
1
2
0
1
(7.22)
x4
nw
(7.23)
Pc k /
cos
(7.24)
g k/
cos
f1 S w , ,
nw
(7.25)
the capillary forces at the pore scale. At the pore scale, capillary forces
dominate the gravity force. Therefore,
= 72 dynes/cm,
7-23
Pc k /
cos
where J S w ,
f 2 Sw ,
J Sw ,
(7.26)
Leverett J-function. Eq.(7.26) suggests that porous media that have the same
pore structure but different permeability and porosity will have the same
Leverett J-function. Therefore, if the different capillary pressure curves of the
porous media are rescaled as a Leverett J-function, they should plot as one
curve. This curve provides the means to average capillary pressure data.
Figure 7.14 shows the Leverett J-function for nine unconsolidated
sands with widely different permeabilities ranging from 0.057 to 2160 darcies.
It is remarkable that the data plot as one curve. Figure 7.15 shows the Jfunction for a carbonate reservoir. If the porous media have different pore
structures, then the Leverett J-functions for the different rocks will be
different and will not plot as one curve as may be seen in Figure 7.16.
7-24
7-25
Figure 7.15. Leverett J-functions for a carbonate reservoir; (a) all cores; (b)
limestone cores; (c) dolomite cores; (d) microgranular limestone cores; (e)
coarse-grained limestone cores (Brown, 1951).
7-26
Figure 7.16. Leverett J-functions for different rock types (Rose and Bruce,
1949).
7-27
From
(7.27)
(7.28)
(7.29)
gz
(7.30)
Pw z
Pw 0
Po z
Po 0
and
7-28
Pc z
Pc 0
gz
(7.31)
We select as datum the free water level at which the capillary pressure is zero.
With this choice of datum, Eq.(7.31) becomes
Pc z
where
gz
gz
(7.32)
Eq.(7.32) is the same as Eq.(6.26) for the capillary rise experiment. The free
water level occurs at a depth do below the oil-water contact given by
Pd
do
(7.33)
Pc
Pd
g
(7.34)
If the displacement pressure of the capillary pressure curve is 0, then the free
water level and the oil-water contact will be the same. However, this is a
special case. In general, the free water level and the oil-water contact are not
the same.
Figure 7.17 shows (1) a typical static fluid distribution in a
homogeneous reservoir, (2) the oil-water contact, (3) the free water level and
(4) the oil and water pressure profiles. Note the transition zone above the oilwater contact in which the water saturation decreases from 100% to the
irreducible water saturation. The height of this transition zone is a function
7-29
of the wettability of the rock, the oil-water density contrast, the oil-water
interfacial tension, the grain size (pore size) and sorting, which determine the
permeability of the rock.
7-30
7-31
7-32
water level. Figure 7.19 shows the water saturation distribution for a well
that has penetrated a layered reservoir. Given the capillary pressure curve for
each layer, it is a simple matter to apply Eqs.(7.32) and (7.33) to calculate the
water saturation distribution from the free water level to the top of the
reservoir. The steps for calculating the water saturation distribution in such a
heterogeneous reservoir is as follows.
1.
Using the displacement pressure of the bottom layer, calculate the free
water level using Eq.(7.33).
2.
3.
4.
5.
Using the capillary pressure curve for the layer in which z occurs, read
or calculate the water saturation for the value of capillary pressure from
step 3.
6.
Increase the value of z and repeat steps 3 through 6 until z reaches the
top of the reservoir.
7-33
This is how the saturation distribution in Figure 7.18c was calculated. If you
look closely at Figure 7.18b in which the four layers have been identified and
their capillary pressure curves have been plotted as height above the free
water level, you can mentally sketch the water saturation distribution over the
entire column of the well.
Figure 7.18. Fluid distribution for a layered reservoir; (a) well penetrating a
layered reservoir; (b) capillary pressure curves for the layers; (c) water
staturation profile observed at the well (Archer and Wall, 1986).
7-34
Example 7.1
Table 7.3 gives the properties of an idealized oil reservoir consisting of four
layers with distinct petrophysical properties. The top of the reservoir is at
8000 ft below the surface and the oil water contact is at 8185 ft. Table 7.4
gives the drainage oil-water capillary pressure curve for Layer 1. All the layers
have the same pore structure but different permeabilities and porosities.
Table 7.3. Petrophysical Properties of Idealized Layered Reservoir.
Depth
(ft)
h (ft)
k (md)
Layer 1
80008050
50
144
23.5
Layer 2
80508070
20
50
20
Layer 3
80708125
55
10
18
Layer 4
81258185
60
200
24
(psi)
1.000
1.973
0.950
2.377
0.900
2.840
0.850
3.377
0.800
4.008
0.750
4.757
0.700
5.663
0.650
6.781
0.600
8.195
0.550
10.039
0.500
12.547
0.450
16.154
0.400
21.787
0.350
31.817
0.300
54.691
0.278
78.408
7-35
1.036 g/cm3
0.822 g/cm3
35 dynes/cm
0
1.
Calculate and plot the graph of the Leverett J-function for the reservoir.
2.
Calculate and plot the capillary pressure curves for Layers 2, 3 and 4,
together with that of Layer 1.
3.
Calculate the depth of the free water level for the reservoir.
4.
Calculate and plot graphs of the initial water and oil saturations in the
reservoir from 8000 ft to the free water level assuming the reservoir is in
capillary equilibrium.
5.
Calculate and plot graphs of the water and oil pressures at the initial
reservoir conditions.
6.
A well drilled into the reservoir has been perforated from 8090 to 8110
ft. Determine the type of reservoir fluid that will be produced initially.
Solution to Example 7.1
1.
7-36
J 0.278,
0.278 ,
/ 0.235
35cos 0
11.902
Layer 2
Layer 3
Layer 4
Pc1
Pc2
Pc3
Pc4
Sw
(psi)
J(Sw)
(psi)
(psi)
(psi)
1.000
1.973
0.299
3.089
6.553
1.692
0.950
2.377
0.361
3.721
7.894
2.038
0.900
2.840
0.431
4.446
9.432
2.435
0.850
3.377
0.513
5.287
11.215
2.896
0.800
4.008
0.608
6.275
13.311
3.437
0.750
4.757
0.722
7.447
15.799
4.079
0.700
5.663
0.860
8.866
18.807
4.856
0.650
6.781
1.029
10.616
22.520
5.815
0.600
8.195
1.244
12.830
27.217
7.027
0.550
10.039
1.524
15.717
33.341
8.609
0.500
12.547
1.905
19.643
41.670
10.759
0.450
16.154
2.452
25.290
53.649
13.852
0.400
21.787
3.307
34.109
72.357
18.683
0.350
31.817
4.830
49.812
105.668
27.283
0.300
54.691
8.302
85.624
181.635
46.898
0.278
78.408
11.902
122.755
260.402
67.235
7-37
Since all the layers have the same pore structure, they share the same
Leverett J-function. Thus, Eq.(7.26) can be solved for Pc using the
known J-function from Layer 1. However, for this example, the capillary
pressure curve for Layer j can be calculated from the data for Layer 1 as
Pcj
Pc1
k1
kj
Pc 2
78.408
144
23.5
20
50
122.755 psi
7-38
The calculated capillary pressure curves are presented in Table 7.5 and
Figure 7.20.
Figure 7.20. Capillary pressure curves for all the layers for the reservoir of
Example 7.1.
3.
do
do
555.69 cm
7-39
d o ft
Pc psi
lb / ft 3
144
Pc psi
lb / ft 3
144
do
144 1.6919
1.036 62.4
0.822 62.4
18.24 ft
The capillary pressure is zero at the free water level and increases as a
linear function of height above the free water level for incompressible
liquids. The height of any point in the reservoir above the free water
level is designated as z in Eq.(7.32) and can be used to calculate the
capillary pressure at that point in the reservoir. Clearly, at any depth D,
z is given by
z
FWL D
Pc
1.036 62.4
0.822 62.4
144
103.24
9.574 psi
7-40
Sw
0.900
9.574 9.432
11.215 9.432
0.850 0.900
0.896
Layer 1
Layer 2
Depth
Pc
Sw
So
Pw
Po
ft
ft
psi
8000
203.24
18.847
0.426
0.574
3688.95
3670.10
8005
198.24
18.383
0.430
0.570
3689.15
3670.77
8010
193.24
17.920
0.434
0.566
3689.36
3671.44
8015
188.24
17.456
0.438
0.562
3689.57
3672.12
8020
183.24
16.992
0.443
0.557
3689.78
3672.79
8025
178.24
16.529
0.447
0.553
3689.99
3673.46
8030
173.24
16.065
0.451
0.549
3690.20
3674.13
8035
168.24
15.601
0.458
0.542
3690.40
3674.80
8040
163.24
15.138
0.464
0.536
3690.61
3675.47
8045
158.24
14.674
0.471
0.529
3690.82
3676.15
8050
153.24
14.210
0.477
0.523
3691.03
3676.82
8050
153.24
14.210
0.576
0.424
3691.03
3676.82
8055
148.24
13.747
0.584
0.416
3691.24
3677.49
8060
143.24
13.283
0.592
0.408
3691.44
3678.16
8065
138.24
12.819
0.600
0.400
3691.65
3678.83
8070
133.24
12.356
0.611
0.389
3691.86
3679.51
8070
133.24
12.356
0.823
0.177
3691.86
3679.51
8075
128.24
11.892
0.834
0.166
3692.07
3680.18
8080
123.24
11.428
0.845
0.155
3692.28
3680.85
8085
118.24
10.965
0.857
0.143
3692.49
3681.52
8090
113.24
10.501
0.870
0.130
3692.69
3682.19
7-41
Layer 3
8095
108.24
10.037
0.883
0.117
3692.90
3682.86
8100
103.24
9.574
0.896
0.104
3693.11
3683.54
8105
98.24
9.110
0.910
0.090
3693.32
3684.21
8110
93.24
8.646
0.926
0.074
3693.53
3684.88
8115
88.24
8.183
0.941
0.059
3693.73
3685.55
8120
83.24
7.719
0.957
0.043
3693.94
3686.22
8125
78.24
7.255
0.974
0.026
3694.15
3686.90
8125
78.24
7.255
0.593
0.407
3694.15
3686.90
8130
73.24
6.792
0.610
0.390
3694.36
3687.57
8135
68.24
6.328
0.629
0.371
3694.57
3688.24
8140
63.24
5.864
0.648
0.352
3694.78
3688.91
8145
58.24
5.401
0.672
0.328
3694.98
3689.58
8150
53.24
4.937
0.696
0.304
3695.19
3690.25
8155
48.24
4.473
0.725
0.275
3695.40
3690.93
8160
43.24
4.010
0.755
0.245
3695.61
3691.60
8165
38.24
3.546
0.791
0.209
3695.82
3692.27
8170
33.24
3.082
0.833
0.167
3696.02
3692.94
8175
28.24
2.619
0.880
0.120
3696.23
3693.61
8180
23.24
2.155
0.935
0.065
3696.44
3694.29
WOC
8185
18.24
1.691
1.000
0.000
3696.65
3694.96
Aquifer
8185
18.24
1.691
1.000
0.000
3696.65
3694.96
8190
13.24
1.228
1.000
0.000
3696.86
3695.63
8195
8.24
0.764
1.000
0.000
3697.06
3696.30
8203.24
0.00
0.000
1.000
0.000
3697.41
3697.41
Layer 4
FWL
7-42
Figure 7.21. Fluid saturation distribution for the reservoir of Example 7.1.
5.
Pw z
Pw 0
z
144
w
7-43
where Pw 0
Pw 0
Patm
FWL
144
14.7
3697.41 psia
At D = 8100 ft,
Pw 103.24
3697.40
1.036 62.4
103.24
144
3651.06 psia
At the free water level, the pressure in the oil phase is equal to the
pressure in the water phase because the free water level is the reference
depth at which the capillary is zero. Thus,
Po 0
Pw 0
3697.41 psia
Of course, there is no oil in the reservoir below the water oil contact.
Therefore, there can be no oil pressure below the water oil contact. The
oil pressure starts at the water contact. However, if the oil pressure is
extrapolated to the free water level, its value will be equal to the water
pressure of 3697.41 psia. It should be noted that the difference between
the water oil pressure and the water pressure at the water oil contact is
equal to the displacement pressure of Layer 4 of 1.692 psi.
At D = 8100 ft, the oil pressure can be calculated as
Po 103.24
Pw 103.24
Pc 103.24
The calculated phase pressures are presented in Table 7.6 and Figure
7.22.
7-44
Figure 7.22. Water and oil phase pressures for Example 7.1.
6.
capillary pressure curves for the same porous medium. At any wetting phase
saturation, the drainage capillary pressure is higher than the imbibition
capillary pressure. At a capillary pressure of zero, the spontaneous imbibition
curve terminates at a wetting phase saturation that may or may not
correspond to the true residual non-wetting phase saturation depending on
the wettability of the rock. If the rock has a strong preference for the wetting
phase, then the wetting phase saturation at which the imbibition curve
terminates will be close to the true residual non-wetting phase saturation, Sor,
which is equal to (1-Swro). This is the case shown in Figure 7.23. If the rock
does not have a strong preference for the wetting phase, then the wetting
phase saturation at zero capillary pressure on the imbibition curve will not
correspond to the true residual non-wetting phase saturation. This means
that (1-Swro) will be larger than Sor. Additional oil can be displaced from the
rock, say be centrifuging the sample in water. This is the case shown in
Figure 7.24. The branch of the imbibition curve labeled 3 on the figure is the
forced imbition capillary pressure curve of the rock. Note that this branch
constitutes a negative capillary pressure. Note also that the true residual nonwetting saturation (Sor) in this case can only by determined by forced
displacement not by spontaneous imbibition.
Figure
7.25
shows
several
cycles
of
capillary
pressure
measurements on the same rock. The primary drainage curve labeled 1 was
performed first, followed by the spontaneous imbibition curve labeled 2. The
secondary drainage curve labeled 3 was performed after the spontaneous
imbibition measurement. It should be noted that the secondary drainage
curve will be less than the primary drainage curve at any given wetting phase
saturation. This is another aspect of capillary pressure hysteresis. If the
spontaneous imbibitition experiment is interupted and the measurement
reversed, then a different drainage curve will be followed as shown in curve 4.
If the drainage experiment is interupted and reversed, then a different
imbibition curve will be followed as shown in curve 5. Curves 4 and 5 form a
7-46
loop known as a scanning curve. Note that the area under the secondary
drainage curve was one of the areas used to define the USBM wettability
index.
Figure 7.23. Drainage and imbibition capillary pressure curves. (1) drainage
curve, (2) spontaneous imbibition curve (Killins et al., 1953).
7-47
Figure 7.24. Drainage and imbibition capillary pressure curves. (1) drainage
curve, (2) spontaneous imbibition curve, (3) forced imbibition curve (Killins et
al., 1953).
7-48
R.
During
imbibition, the wetting phase advances into the porous medium and the
contact angle is the advancing contact angle,
2 cos
A.
Since
is less than
A,
/rm, the
7-49
7-50
Figure 7.26. Drainage and imbibition capillary pressures versus saturation for
an idealized pore.
Pcdr1
4 cos
De1
(7.35)
However, this capillary pressure is not sufficient to drain the entire pore
because neck De2 is smaller than De1. The interface will stop at De2. To
continue with the drainage, the applied capillary pressure must be increased
to Pcdr2 given by
7-51
Pcdr 2
4 cos
De2
(7.36)
Looking at the remaining necks of the pore, we see that Pcdr2 is large enough
to drain the remaining portion of the pore. Now, let us reduce the capillary
pressure to start the imbibition process. When the capillary pressure is
reduced to Pcibm1 given by
Pcimb1
4 cos
D1
(7.37)
the first pore will be emptied of the non-wetting phase and the interface will
come to equilibrium at the location marked Imb1. To drain the non-wetting
phase further, the capillary pressure must be further reduced to Pcimb2 given
by
Pcimb 2
4 cos
D2
(7.38)
Looking at the remaining necks of the pore, we see that Pcimb2 is low enough to
empty the remaining portion of the pore of the non-wetting phase. Figure
7.27b shows the drainage and imbibition capillary pressure curves for the
experiment just described. We see capillary pressure hysteresis.
Figure 7.28 shows how the imbibition capillary pressure curve can be
used along with the drainage curve to determine the type of fluid that will be
produced at various depths in a reservoir. If the well is perforated above the
transition zone, only clean oil (water free oil) will be produced initially. If the
well is perforated in the upper part of the transition zone, both oil and water
will be produced from day one. If the well is perforated in the bottom part of
the transition zone, only water will be produced even though the zone has oil
saturation. The oil saturation in this zone is residual oil saturation.
7-52
pressure
hysteresis
presents
no
problem
in
reservoir
7-53
Figure 7.28. Drainage and imbibition capillary pressure curves showing the
depth of water free oil production (Archer and Wall, 1986).
reservoir
consisting
of
two
layers
with
different
permeabilities and capillary pressure curves as shown in Figure 7.29 (a) and
(b). Initially, both layers are in capillary equilibrium at their respective
irreducible
water
saturations.
Let
this
7-54
equilibrium
be
disturbed
by
waterflooding the two layers. The injected water will advance further into the
more permeable layer (Figure 7.29 (c)).
continuous across the boundary between the two layers. Thus, at the
boundary,
Po1
Po 2
(7.39)
Pw1
Pw 2
(7.40)
and
Pc1
Pc 2
(7.41)
Thus, at equilibrium, the capillary pressures in the two porous media will be
equal at their boundary.
In Figure 7.29c, sections A and D and C and F are in capillary
equilibrium, so no fluid exchanges will occur between these sections.
Sections B and E are not in capillary equilibrium, so fluid exchanges will
occur in an effort to achieve capillary equilibrium. Section E will loose water
to section B and gain oil from B while section B will gain water from E and
loose oil to E until a new capillary equilibrium is achieved. Thus, water will
be imbibed into the less permeable layer from the more permeable layer and
oil will be expelled from the less permeable layer into the more permeable
layer for subsequent displacement. This fluid exchange is beneficial to the oil
recovery process. However, the imbibition process is very slow. Therefore, the
water injection rate must be sufficiently slow for imbibition to assist in
waterflooding the low permeability layer.
7-55
whereas the matrix blocks have normal capillary pressure curves. When the
fractures become 100% saturated with water which comes in contact with the
oil saturated matrix blocks, the capillary equilibrium will be disturbed. Water
will be imbibed into the matrix blocks, expelling oil from the matrix blocks
into the fractures. Ultimately, the oil saturation in the matrix will be reduced
to the residual oil saturation over time.
7-56
requires that the capillary pressure inside the core at the outlet end be equal
to zero.
Consider a porous medium initially saturated with a non-wetting phase
(say oil) and irreducible wetting phase saturation (say water). The outlet end
of the core is at a higher capillary pressure than the outside. If the medium is
flooded with the wetting phase (waterflooded), initially, only the non-wetting
phase (oil) will be expelled from the outlet end at a higher capillary pressure
than the outside (Figure 7.30a). When the wetting phase arrives at the outlet
end, however, the system now has a chance to seek capillary equilibrium.
This equilibrium will be achieved by the accumulation of the wetting phase at
the outlet end of the core until the wetting phase saturation equals the
wetting phase saturation at zero capillary pressure on the imbibition capillary
pressure curve (Figure 7.30b). This saturation is marked Swro in Figure 7.30b.
Thus, the production of the wetting phase is delayed until well after the
arrival of the wetting phase at the outlet end of the core. This phenomenon is
known as capillary end effect.
This phenomenon has several undesirable consequences. The observed
breakthrough recovery of the non-wetting phase will be falsely high and the
wetting phase saturation distribution in the core will be opposite what would
normally be expected, with the wetting phase saturation being higher towards
the core outlet than in the rest of the core (Figure 7.30c). Most corefloods are
blind tests because one cannot see the fluid distribution inside the core.
7-57
Figure 7.30. Capillary end effect; (a) coreflood; (b) spontaneous imbibition
capillary pressure curve; (c) wetting phase saturation profiles; (d) relative
permeabililty curves.
7-58
qw
kw A Pw
x
w
(7.42)
qnw
knw A Pnw
x
nw
(7.43)
and
where kw and knw are the effective permeabilities to the wetting and nonwetting phases. Let us define the relative permeabilities of the wetting and
non-wetting phases as
krw
kw
k
(7.44)
krnw
knw
k
(7.45)
and
qw
kkrw A Pw
x
w
and
7-59
(7.46)
kkrnw A Pnw
x
nw
qnw
(7.47)
Pw
(7.48)
Pc S w
(7.49)
qw qnw
Sw
t
qw
x
(7.50)
Sw
(7.51)
Snw 1
qw w
kkrw A
qnw nw
kkrnw A
Pnw
x
Pw
x
(7.52)
7-60
qw
q
kkrnw A Pc
q nw x
k
1 rnw w
krw nw
(7.53)
qw
q
fw
(7.54)
Fw
1
k
1 rnw
krw
(7.55)
w
nw
The approximate fractional flow of the wetting phase also can be defined as a
function of the mobility ratio as
Fw
1
M
(7.56)
fw
Fw 1
kkrnw A Pc
q nw x
(7.57)
xD
x
L
7-61
(7.58)
Pc S w
(7.59)
Substituting Eqs.(7.58) and (7.59) into (7.57) gives the true fractional flow of
the wetting phase as
fw
A cos k
q nw L
Fw 1
krnw
J
xD
(7.60)
The term in the inner bracket on the right side of Eq.(7.60) is a dimensionless
number that gives the ratio of the capillary to viscous forces in the
displacement. Let this dimensionless number be defined as
N cap
A cos k
q nw L
(7.61)
fw
Fw 1 N cap krnw
J
xD
(7.62)
tD
qt
A L
(7.63)
Substituting Eq.(7.63) into (7.50) gives the continuity equation for the wetting
phase as
7-62
Sw
tD
fw
xD
(7.64)
dFw
dS w
Sw
xD
N cap
Fw krnw
xD
J
xD
(7.65)
dFw
dS w
Sw
xD
N cap
xD
Fw krnw
dJ S w
dS w xD
(7.66)
Eq.(7.66) is the final form of the partial differential equation for the
wetting phase saturation for two phase immiscible displacement in a linear
porous medium. When supplemented with appropriate initial and boundary
conditions together with the rock and fluid properties, its solution can be
used to calculate the performance of the immiscible displacement such as a
waterflood or a gas flood. The solution of this equation is deferred to Chapter
8. Our concern here is the capillary end effect, not the prediction of the overall
displacement performance.
Let us examine in detail the fractional flow of the wetting phase at the
outlet end of the core. Applied to the outlet end of the core, Eq.(7.62) can be
written as
fw
Fw 1 N cap krnw
J
xD
(7.67)
J
xD
In Eq.(7.68), J
(7.68)
xD
is the J-
fw
Fw 1 N cap krnw
J
xD
(7.69)
Depending on the values of N cap , krnw , and J , it is possible for the following
inequality to prevail during the displacement:
1 N cap krnw
J
xD
(7.70)
Figure 7.31. Initial capillary barrier at the outlet end of the core.
7-64
If
1 N cap krnw
J
xD
(7.71)
then
fw
(7.72)
at the outlet end of the core. Because the fractional flow of the wetting phase
is zero at the outlet end of the core, the wetting phase cannot flow out of the
core but instead will accumulate there raising the wetting phase saturation to
an abnormal level. This is the capillary end effect phenomenon at work. If
1 N cap krnw
J
xD
(7.73)
the wetting phase cannot flow out of the core either but will accumulate at the
end as before, raising the wetting saturation there to an abnormal level.
Although the inequality given by Eq.(7.73) appears to indicate that the wetting
phase will flow backwards into the core, this will not happen because there is
no supply of the wetting phase outside the outlet end of the core for it to be
imbibed into the core. Therefore, Eq.(7.70) gives the condition for capillary end
effect to occur in an immiscible displacement.
Let us now examine the physics of the displacement before and after
wetting phase breakthrough. Before the arrival of the wetting phase at the
outlet end of the core, only the non-wetting phase will be produced. The
wetting phase saturation profiles will be as shown in Figure 7.30a at t1 and t2.
At time ta , the wetting phase arrives at the outlet end of the core. At this time,
then capillary end effect will occur and the wetting phase begins to
accumulate at the outlet end of the core resulting in the increase of the
wetting saturation, S w L, t . As the wetting phase saturation increases, J
decreases dramatically as shown in Figure 7.30b. When the wetting phase
saturation has increased to S wro , J
achieved between the porous medium and the outside. At this time, Eq.(7.69)
gives
fw
Fw
(7.74)
and the wetting phase flows out of the core and is produced along with the
non-wetting phase. The wetting phase saturation profile at breakthrough is
shown in Figure 7.30c at tbt . After breakthrough, both phases will be
produced until residual non-wetting phase is achieved in the core after many
pore volumes of wetting phase injection. The wetting phase saturation profile
will be as shown in Figure 7.30c at t . Beyond this time, only the wetting
phase will be produced.
How can capillary end effect be eliminated from the experiment? The
condition for eliminating the capillary end effect is obtained from Eq.(7.69) as
1 N cap krnw
J
xD
(7.75)
or
N cap
xD
krnw J
7-66
(7.76)
xD
krnw J
N capcritical
(7.77)
For N cap below the critical value, capillary end effect will be eliminated. Above
the critical value, capillary end effect will occur in the displacement.
How can the value of N cap be controlled in the experiment? The only
means to control N cap in the experiment is through the injection rate, q.
Examination of Eq.(7.61) shows that N cap can be made small by the use of a
high injection rate in the experiment. Substituting Eq.(7.61) into (7.76) gives
the condition for the injection rate to eliminate capillary end effect as
Akrnw J
cos
nw L xD
(7.78)
qcritical
Akrnw J
cos
nw L xD
(7.79)
For injection rates below the critical value, capillary end effect will occur. For
rates above the critical, capillary end effect will be eliminated. In terms of
Darcy velocity, Eqs.(7.78) and (7.79) become
q
A
krnw J
cos k
nw L xD
7-67
(7.80)
vcritical
krnw J
cos k
nw L xD
(7.81)
fw
Fw 1 N cap krnw
dJ dS w
dS w dxD
(7.82)
dS w
dxD
fw
1
Fw
dJ
N cap krnw
dS w
7-68
(7.83)
Eq.(7.83) is the partial differential equation for the steady state wetting phase
saturation. It is a first order nonlinear equation that can easily be integrated
to obtain the steady state saturation profile. The appropriate boundary
condition for the equation is
Sw 1
S wro
(7.84)
Figure 7.33 shows the steady state saturation profile obtained by solving
Eqs.(7.83) with the boundary condition given by Eq.(7.84).
7-69
Figure 7.33. Steady state wetting phase saturation profile in the presence of
capillary end effect.
Figure 7.34 shows the water saturation profiles for the low rate flood.
The water arrived at the outlet end of the core at tD = 0.41 pore volume
injected. However, no water was produced from the core until tD = 0.60 pore
volume injected. Thus, the flood was affected by capillary end effect. The water
saturation profile at tD = 0.60 clearly shows the capillary end effect.
Figure 7.35 shows the water saturation profiles for the high rate flood.
The water arrived at the outlet end of the core at tD = 0.60 pore volume
injected and got produced shortly thereafter at tD = 0.65 pore volume injected.
Thus, the capillary end effect was significantly reduced in the high rate
displacement compared to the low rate displacement.
Figure 7.34. Wetting phase saturation profiles at low injection rate (Perkins,
1957).
7-71
Figure 7.35. Wetting phase saturation profiles at high injection rate (Perkins,
1957).
The second example from Richardson et al. (1952) investigated capillary
end effect in steady state experiments. The core was a Berea sandstone of
length 30 cm and diameter 6.85 cm. The core was cut into 8 segments as
shown in Figure 7.36. Steps were taken to ensure capillary continuity
between the segments. The core was initially saturated with oil, which was the
wetting phase. Then helium, the non-wetting phase, and oil were injected
simultaneously at various ratios. After steady state was achieved, the core
segments were weighed to determine the wetting phase saturation in each
segment.
7-72
laboratory
scale
immiscible
displacements.
Since
such
7-74
7-75
allows the wetting phase displaced from the sample to pass through while
blocking the passage of the non-wetting phase. Extending from the porous
7-76
plate is a graduated tube which allows the volume of the wetting phase
displaced to be measured as shown in Figure 7.41. With the sample in place,
the pressure of the non-wetting fluid is increased in steps and the system is
allowed to achieve equilibrium after each pressure change.
The volume of
The major
disadvantage of the porous plate method is that it takes too long to obtain the
entire capillary pressure curve. It is not unusual for the capillary pressure
experiment to take several weeks to complete.
7.10.2 Mercury Injection Method
In this method, capillary pressure is measured by injecting mercury,
which is a non-wetting phase, into the sample. The apparatus used in the
measurement is shown in Figure 7.42.
mercury injection pump. A dry sample is placed in the cell and the cell is
evacuated. Mercury is injected into the cell until the mercury is level with a
graduation on the high-pressure glass capillary above the sample chamber.
Nitrogen pressure is then applied in successive increments and at each step,
7-77
Figure 7.41. Porous plate capillary pressure apparatus (Welge and Bruce,
1947).
mercury is injected to maintain the mercury level with the graduation on the
capillary. From the volume of the cell and the volume of mercury required to
fill the cell with the sample before mercury injection into the sample, the bulk
volume of the sample can be determined. The mercury-air capillary pressure
versus saturation relationship is calculated from the volume of mercury
forced into the sample pore space as a function of the applied nitrogen
pressure.
7-78
Figure 7.38. Capillary pressure cell for mercury injection (Purcell, 1949).
The mercury injection method is very fast. The capillary pressure curve
can be obtained in a matter of hours. The imbibition curve can be obtained
very easily by decreasing the nitrogen pressure and withdrawing mercury
from the system.
7-79
Brown (1951) has shown that the mercury injection method can give
essentially the same capillary pressure curve as the restored state method
except for a scaling factor. Figures 7.44 and 7.45 compare capillary pressure
curves obtained by mercury injection and the restored state method for a
sandstone and a limestone core, respectively.
agreement between the two methods. The scaling factors for the sandstone
and limestone were 7.5 and 5.5, respectively.
7-80
scaling factor of 5.2 suggested by Purcell (1949) based on the ratio of cos of
mercury-air and water-air systems.
The major disadvantage of the mercury injection method is that the core
can no longer be used for other tests after mercury injection. The method
also cannot be used to determine the irreducible wetting phase saturation.
7.10.3 Centrifuge Method.
In this method, the sample saturated with a wetting fluid is placed in a
centrifuge cup containing the non-wetting fluid as shown in Figures 7.46 and
7.47. The sample is rotated at a series of constant angular velocities and the
amount of wetting fluid displaced at equilibrium at each velocity is measured
with the aid of a stroboscopic light. The only data measured directly in this
method are the volume of wetting fluid displaced and the corresponding
rotational speed of the centrifuge.
At equilibrium, the
dPw
dr
dPo
dr
2
w
2
o
7-81
(7.85)
(7.86)
7-82
7-83
7-84
where
dPc
dr
2
w
7-85
(7.87)
Pc
(7.88)
Pc
r22 r 2
(7.89)
where r2 is the outlet face of the core measured from the center of rotation. At
any stage of the centrifuge experiment, the highest capillary pressure occurs
at r1, the inlet face of the core measured from the center of rotation. At the
inlet face, the capillary pressure is given by
2
Pc1
r22 r12
(7.90)
S wav
r1
S w dr
r2 r1
7-86
(7.91)
Multiplying Eq.(7.91) by
r2
Lr1S wav
r1
Sw
(7.92)
r1dr
dPc1 ,
Pc1S wav
S w Pc dPc
(7.93)
S w1
d Pc1S wav
dPc1
(7.94)
or
S w1
S wav
Pc1
dS wav
dPc1
(7.95)
Hassler and Brunner (1945). Although the capillary pressure curve from
centrifuge measurement is somewhat higher than from the restored state
method, the agreement between the two sets of data is reasonable. In this
figure, the open circles are data obtained by the use of Eq.(7.94) and the open
squares are data obtained by the use of Eq.(7.95) to compute the inlet water
saturation. It should be observed that both equations give somewhat different
results for the water saturations.
capillary pressure curves for the same cores measured by the restored state
method (diaphram), mercury injection and centrifuge experiments. The
agreement between the three methods is excellent.
The disadvantages of the method include (1) inability to measure the
displacement pressure since the water saturation at the core inlet is always
less than the average water saturation of the core, (2) the Hassler-Brunner
boundary condition at the core outlet may be violated at high centrifuge
speeds, (3) the calculated water saturation at the core inlet is an
approximation, and (4) inability to obtain spontaneous imbibition capillary
pressure curve.
7-88
7-89
Example 7.2
Table 7.7 shows the data obtained in a centrifuge experiment for determining
the air-water capillary pressure curve of a core sample. Other data from the
experiment are as follows:
Core length
2.0 cm
Core diameter
2.53 cm
1.73 cm3
Core permeability
144 md
7-90
r2
8.6 cm
=
0.9988 gm/cm3
8.6 cm
1.
Calculate the capillary pressure curves for the sample using Eq.(7.94)
(method 1) and Eq. (7.95) (method 2) for the inlet water saturation.
2.
Compare the capillary pressure curves obtained from the two methods.
3.
7-91
S wav
V p Vw / V p
2 N / 60
2
Pc1
r22 r12
Pc1
281362.40 /1.0133x106
Pc1
281362.40 14.696
1.0133 x106
281362.40 dynes/cm2
0.28 atm
4.08 psi
Figure 7.50 shows the graph of S wav Pc1 versus Pc1 . The regression
equation is
S w1
d S wav Pc1
dPc1
0.6217 1.3563
281362.40 14.696
1.0133 x106
7-92
0.3783
0.495
10
11
Centrifug
Method
Method 2
1(Eq.7.94)
(Eq.7.95)
Speed
Vw
RPM
cc
Swav
radians/
Pc1
Pc1
Pc1
SwavPc1
dynes/cm2
atm
psi
psi
Sw1
dS wav
dPc1
Sw1
psi-1
psi
s
1300
0.30
0.827
136.14
281362.40
0.28
4.08
3.37
0.495
-0.0739
0.525
1410
0.40
0.769
147.65
330992.07
0.33
4.80
3.69
0.466
-0.0590
0.485
1550
0.50
0.711
162.32
399984.12
0.39
5.80
4.12
0.434
-0.0455
0.447
1700
0.60
0.653
178.02
481146.36
0.47
6.98
4.56
0.404
-0.0353
0.407
1840
0.70
0.595
192.68
563657.13
0.56
8.17
4.87
0.381
-0.0283
0.364
2010
0.75
0.566
210.49
672622.63
0.66
9.76
5.53
0.356
-0.0222
0.350
2200
0.80
0.538
230.38
805795.28
0.80
11.69
6.28
0.333
-0.0173
0.335
2500
0.90
0.480
261.80
1040541.4
1.03
15.09
7.24
0.302
-0.0122
0.296
1.23
18.13
7.65
0.282
-0.0095
0.251
1.60
23.50
9.24
0.255
-0.0066
0.238
2.39
35.05
12.76
0.220
-0.0038
0.231
3.34
49.11
15.05
0.193
-0.0024
0.189
5.32
78.17
21.69
0.162
-0.0013
0.179
3
2740
1.00
0.422
286.93
1249915.0
1
3120
1.05
0.393
326.73
1620647.4
3
3810
1.10
0.364
398.98
2416736.5
4
4510
1.20
0.306
472.29
3386354.6
6
5690
1.25
0.277
595.86
5390187.7
2
Figure 7.51 shows the graph of S wav versus Pc1 . The regression equation
is
S wav
1.3563Pc10.3783
7-93
dS wav
dPc1
0.3783 1.3563
281362.40 14.696
1.0133x106
1.3783
0.0739
S w1
S wav
Pc1
dS wav
dPc1
1.73 0.30
1.73
281362.40 14.696
1.0133 x106
0.0739
Figure 7.50. Graph of S wav Pc1 versus Pc1 for Example 7.2.
7-94
0.525
2.
3.
The acceleration imposed at the inlet end of the core at the centrifuge
speed of 5690 RPM is given by
acceleration
r1
2 N
60
r1
5690
60
6.6
2343288.19 cm/s2
7-95
Pc
2 cos
R
(7.96)
pressure. This is the raw data obtained from the experiment. Note that the
cumulative volume of mercury injected expressed as a fraction of the pore
volume is the non-wetting phase saturation, Snw. Shown on the capillary
pressure axis is the corresponding pore throat size obtained from Eq.(7.96) as
2 cos
Pc
(7.97)
S w 1 Snw
7-98
(7.98)
It should be noted that the pore throat radius, R, decreases from left to right
in the figure. Let us replot the saturations versus pore throat size such that
the pore throat size increases from left to right as shown in Figure 7.54. It
should be observed that the Sw versus R curve now represents the cumulative
probability distribution function for the pore volume distribution whereas the
Snw versus R curve represents the expectation curve for the pore volume
distribution. At any value of R, Sw is the fraction of the pore volume occupied
by pores having pore throat size equal to R or less. If the probability density
function for the pore volume distribution is f (R), then
R
Sw
f R dR
(7.99)
f R dR 1
(7.100)
R final
where
R0
R final
f R
dS w
dR
(7.101)
f R
dS nw
dR
(7.102)
7-99
Pc R
2 cos
(7.103)
a constant
Pc dR RdPc
(7.104)
Figure 7.54. Saturations versus pore throat size from mercury injection.
Substituting Eqs.(7.96) and (7.104) into Eqs.(7.101) and (7.102) gives the
following alternative expressions for the probability density function for the
pore volume distribution:
f R
dS w
dR
Pc dS w
R dPc
7-100
2 cos
R2
dS w
dPc
(7.105)
f R
dS nw
dR
Pc dS w
R dPc
2 cos
R2
dS nw
dPc
(7.106)
Thus, differentiating the saturation versus the pore throat radius curve from
the experiment leads directly to the probability density function for the pore
volume distribution of the rock. Further, a plot of the incremental pore
volume of mercury injected versus pore throat size also is a measure of the
pore volume distribution.
Differentiation of experimental data can be a noisy affair. The threepoint central difference approximation given previously for the calculation of
the welltest derivative function (Eq.(3.65)) can be used to differentiate the
experimental data. It should be noted that the welltest derivative function
should be divided by ti to obtain the first derivative of the function. There are
other differentiation schemes that may be less noisy than the three-point
central difference formula. The five-point central difference formula proposed
by Akima (1970) may be less noisy than the three-point central difference
formula. The computational template for the five-point central difference
formula is shown in Figure 7.55. The first derivative at x3 is given by
7-101
Figure 7.55. Computational template for calculating the first derivative using
Akima's method (Akima, 1970).
dy
dx
x3
m4 m3 m2
m4 m3
m2 m1 m3
m2 m1
(7.107)
where
m4
y5
x5
y4
x4
(7.108)
m3
y4
x4
y3
x3
(7.109)
m2
y3
x3
y2
x2
(7.110)
7-102
y2
x2
m1
y1
x1
(7.111)
( R) , where R is the pore throat radius. Then, for the porous medium,
( R)dR 1
(7.112)
( R)dR . The
number of pores with radii between R and R+dR is N ( R)dR , where N is the
total number of pores (capillary tubes) making up the porous medium. The
cross-sectional area of the pores with radii between R and R+dR is given by
dAc
R 2 N ( R)dR
(7.113)
Ac
AT
N R 2 ( R)dR
(7.114)
7-103
is the
R2
R 2 ( R)dR
a constant
(7.115)
NR 2
(7.116)
Ac
AT
Vp
NL R 2 ( R)dR
AT L
NLR 2
(7.117)
At capillary equilibrium, the wetting phase occupies all the pores with radii
less than R corresponding to the capillary pressure given by
2 cos
Pc ( S w )
(7.118)
NL R 2 ( R)dR
Vw
(7.119)
Sw
Vw
Vp
R 2 ( R)dR
R ( R)dR
0
0
2
R ( R)dR
0
7-104
R2
(7.120)
R 2 Sw
R 2 ( R)dR
0
r 2 (r )dr
(7.121)
dS w
R
dR
2
d
r 2 (r )dr
dR 0
(7.122)
The right side of Eq.(7.122) can be evaluated using Leibnitzs rule for
differentiating a definite integral as follows:
R
d
r 2 (r )dr
dR 0
dR
d0
R ( R)
0 (0)
dR
dR
r 2 (r )
R
dr
(7.123)
The integrand of the integral on the right side of Eq.(7.123) is zero. Therefore,
Eq.(7.123) simplifies to
R
d
r 2 (r )dr
dR 0
R 2 ( R)
(7.124)
R2
dS w
dR
R 2 ( R)
(7.125)
dPc ( S w )
dR
2 cos
R2
7-105
(7.126)
R2
R 4 ( R)
2 cos
dPc ( S w )
dS w
(7.127)
The probability density function for the pore size distribution can be obtained
from Eq.(7.127) as
( R)
R2
2 cos
R
dPc ( S w )
dS w
(7.128)
( R)
R2
Pc ( S w )
R
dPc ( S w )
dS w
(7.129)
Eqs.(7.118) and (7.129) can be used to calculate the pore size distribution
from a drainage capillary pressure curve as follows:
1. Pick a high Pc(Sw) value corresponding to a low wetting phase
saturation, Sw, and a small pore size, R.
2. Calculate the pore radius, R, using Eq.(7.118).
3. Calculate the derivative of the capillary pressure curve with respect to
the wetting phase saturation at the value of the Pc(Sw) in step 1. Note
that this is a negative quantity.
4. Calculate
( R) / R 2 using Eq.(7.129).
7-106
5. Pick lower values of Pc(Sw) and repeat steps 2 through 4 until the entire
capillary pressure curve has been used in the pore size distribution
calculation.
6. Plot the graph of
( R) versus R,
which is the required probability density function for the pore size
distribution.
Eq.(7.129) was derived for a general capillary pressure curve obtained
by any method. In the case of the capillary pressure curve obtained by
mercury porosimetry, Eq.(7.129) can be transformed by substitution of
Eq.(7.104) to obtain the probability density function as
R 2 dS w
R 2 dR
(7.130)
R 2 dS nw
R 2 dR
(7.131)
or
7-107
Figure 7.56. Pore size distributions of sedimentary rocks based on the bundle
of capillary tubes model of the rock (Crocker, 1983).
7-108
Example 7.3
The first three columns of Table 7.9 give the mercury injection data for a low
permeability sandstone sample with k = 0.048 md and
= 5.6%. Calculate
3.
4.
Table 7.9. Mercury Injection Data and Calculated Pore Size Distributions for
Example 7.3.
1
Snw
Sw
Pc
Pc
(psi)
(dynes/cm2
Snw
R
(cm)
Pore Volume
Pore Radius
Distribution
Distribution
f R
dS w
dR
R 2 dS w
R 2 dR
m)
m)
m)
0.000
0.000
0.323
0.002
0.424
0.004
0.508
0.006
0.691
0.012
0.000
0.031
0.068
0.104
0.168
1.000
0.969
0.932
0.896
0.832
124.92
150.75
175.43
200.40
249.77
8.613E+06
1.039E+07
1.210E+07
1.382E+07
1.722E+07
0.0000
8.538E-
0.853
05
0.0312
7.075E-
0.707
05
0.0370
6.080E-
0.608
05
0.0355
5.322E-
0.532
05
0.0640
4.270E-
0.427
05
7-109
0.229
0.330
0.428
0.513
0.577
0.625
0.660
0.686
0.709
0.730
0.748
0.765
0.780
0.794
0.806
0.818
0.829
0.771
0.670
0.572
0.487
0.423
0.375
0.340
0.314
0.291
0.270
0.252
0.235
0.220
0.206
0.194
0.182
0.171
300.12
400.20
499.51
599.28
699.36
799.13
899.29
999.18
1098.89
1198.44
1298.50
1398.24
1498.24
1598.66
1695.09
1797.32
1895.87
2.069E+07
2.759E+07
3.444E+07
4.132E+07
4.822E+07
5.510E+07
6.201E+07
6.889E+07
7.577E+07
8.263E+07
8.953E+07
9.641E+07
1.033E+08
1.102E+08
1.169E+08
1.239E+08
1.307E+08
0.0613
3.554E-
0.355
05
0.1011
2.665E-
0.266
05
0.0981
2.135E-
0.213
05
0.0847
1.780E-
0.178
05
0.0637
1.525E-
0.152
05
0.0478
1.335E-
0.133
05
0.0351
1.186E-
0.118
05
0.0264
1.067E-
0.106
05
0.0227
9.706E-
0.097
06
0.0212
8.900E-
0.089
06
0.0180
8.214E-
0.082
06
0.0165
7.628E-
0.076
06
0.0149
7.119E-
0.071
06
0.0141
6.672E-
0.066
06
0.0124
6.292E-
0.062
06
0.0114
5.934E-
0.059
06
0.0107
5.626E-
0.056
06
7-110
0.928
0.024
1.385
0.064
2.310
0.166
2.499
0.259
2.507
0.354
2.501
0.461
2.289
0.534
2.268
0.654
2.636
0.919
2.637
1.094
2.638
1.284
2.875
1.623
3.042
1.971
3.245
2.394
3.255
2.700
3.268
3.048
3.390
3.518
0.838
0.856
0.871
0.885
0.897
0.907
0.918
0.928
0.937
0.944
0.950
0.956
0.960
0.965
0.968
0.972
0.975
0.162
0.144
0.129
0.115
0.103
0.093
0.082
0.072
0.063
0.056
0.050
0.044
0.040
0.035
0.032
0.028
0.025
2000.98
2196.94
2396.98
2597.89
2799.03
2997.38
3248.15
3495.86
3744.60
3996.64
4246.84
4494.10
4745.57
4997.24
5245.84
5496.45
5746.20
1.380E+08
1.515E+08
1.653E+08
1.791E+08
1.930E+08
2.067E+08
2.240E+08
2.410E+08
2.582E+08
2.756E+08
2.928E+08
3.099E+08
3.272E+08
3.446E+08
3.617E+08
3.790E+08
3.962E+08
0.0095
5.330E-
0.053
06
0.0175
4.855E-
0.048
06
0.0154
4.450E-
0.044
06
0.0135
4.105E-
0.041
06
0.0121
3.810E-
0.038
06
0.0100
3.558E-
0.035
06
0.0113
3.284E-
0.032
06
0.0098
3.051E-
0.030
06
0.0087
2.848E-
0.028
06
0.0065
2.669E-
0.026
06
0.0064
2.511E-
0.025
06
0.0056
2.373E-
0.023
06
0.0047
2.247E-
0.022
06
0.0041
2.134E-
0.021
06
0.0036
2.033E-
0.020
06
0.0035
1.940E-
0.019
06
0.0036
1.856E-
0.018
06
7-111
3.539
4.091
3.800
5.295
3.866
6.413
4.010
7.812
4.038
9.133
4.054
10.514
4.196
12.778
4.253
15.004
4.213
17.054
4.068
18.757
4.068
21.180
4.041
23.561
3.725
24.214
3.675
26.495
3.645
28.956
3.958
34.517
4.128
39.346
0.978
0.981
0.983
0.985
0.987
0.990
0.992
0.995
0.997
0.998
0.999
1.000
0.022
0.019
0.017
0.015
0.013
0.010
0.008
0.005
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.000
5994.05
6246.10
6497.47
6744.53
6996.48
7497.19
7997.18
8494.95
8995.38
9495.55
9996.48
10496.0
4.133E+08
4.307E+08
4.480E+08
4.650E+08
4.824E+08
5.169E+08
5.514E+08
5.857E+08
6.202E+08
6.547E+08
6.893E+08
7.237E+08
0
1.000
0.000
10997.0
7.583E+08
3
1.000
0.000
11495.5
7.926E+08
6
1.000
0.000
11996.4
8.272E+08
7
1.000
0.000
12495.5
8.616E+08
4
1.000
0.000
12996.0
7
8.961E+08
0.0030
1.779E-
0.017
06
0.0025
1.708E-
0.017
06
0.0022
1.642E-
0.016
06
0.0022
1.581E-
0.015
06
0.0016
1.524E-
0.015
06
0.0031
1.423E-
0.014
06
0.0020
1.334E-
0.013
06
0.0025
1.256E-
0.012
06
0.0018
1.186E-
0.011
06
0.0016
1.123E-
0.011
06
0.0009
1.067E-
0.010
06
0.0006
1.016E-
0.010
06
0.0000
9.699E-
0.009
07
0.0000
9.278E-
0.009
07
0.0000
8.891E-
0.008
07
0.0000
8.536E-
0.008
07
0.0000
8.207E-
0.008
07
7-112
3.692
38.296
3.509
39.516
3.491
42.548
3.308
43.446
2.964
41.879
2.913
47.272
2.862
52.840
2.734
56.951
2.661
62.153
2.452
63.825
1.491
43.010
0.524
16.671
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.000
0.000
13495.1
9.305E+08
1
1.000
0.000
13995.9
9.650E+08
0
1.000
0.000
14495.6
9.995E+08
8
1.000
0.000
14996.2
1.034E+09
0
1.000
0.000
15495.9
1.068E+09
8
1.000
0.000
15995.1
1.103E+09
3
1.000
0.000
16495.5
1.137E+09
2
1.000
0.000
16995.2
1.172E+09
8
1.000
0.000
17495.3
1.206E+09
3
1.000
0.000
17995.5
1.241E+09
0
1.000
0.000
18495.9
1.275E+09
5
1.000
0.000
18996.3
1.310E+09
7
1.000
0.000
19495.3
1.344E+09
3
1.000
0.000
19995.7
1.379E+09
3
1.000
0.000
20995.3
1.448E+09
1
1.000
0.000
21995.7
1.517E+09
9
1.000
0.000
22995.6
4
1.586E+09
0.0000
7.903E-
0.007
07
0.0000
7.621E-
0.007
07
0.0000
7.358E-
0.007
07
0.0000
7.112E-
0.007
07
0.0000
6.883E-
0.006
07
0.0000
6.668E-
0.006
07
0.0000
6.466E-
0.006
07
0.0000
6.276E-
0.006
07
0.0000
6.096E-
0.006
07
0.0000
5.927E-
0.005
07
0.0000
5.766E-
0.005
07
0.0000
5.615E-
0.005
07
0.0000
5.471E-
0.005
07
0.0000
5.334E-
0.005
07
0.0000
5.080E-
0.005
07
0.0000
4.849E-
0.004
07
0.0000
4.638E-
0.004
07
7-113
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.000
0.000
23995.7
1.655E+09
2
1.000
0.000
24996.3
1.724E+09
4
1.000
0.000
25994.9
1.792E+09
6
1.000
0.000
26995.6
1.861E+09
5
1.000
0.000
27995.6
1.930E+09
6
1.000
0.000
28996.0
1.999E+09
8
1.000
0.000
29995.4
2.068E+09
9
1.000
0.000
30996.2
2.137E+09
1
1.000
0.000
31995.5
2.206E+09
3
1.000
0.000
32996.2
2.275E+09
0
1.000
0.000
33996.5
2.344E+09
7
1.000
0.000
34996.1
2.413E+09
7
1.000
0.000
35996.3
2.482E+09
2
1.000
0.000
36995.5
2.551E+09
3
1.000
0.000
37996.3
2.620E+09
9
1.000
0.000
38996.3
2.689E+09
8
1.000
0.000
39995.7
5
2.758E+09
0.0000
4.445E-
0.004
07
0.0000
4.267E-
0.004
07
0.0000
4.103E-
0.004
07
0.0000
3.951E-
0.004
07
0.0000
3.810E-
0.003
07
0.0000
3.678E-
0.003
07
0.0000
3.556E-
0.003
07
0.0000
3.441E-
0.003
07
0.0000
3.333E-
0.003
07
0.0000
3.232E-
0.003
07
0.0000
3.137E-
0.003
07
0.0000
3.048E-
0.003
07
0.0000
2.963E-
0.003
07
0.0000
2.883E-
0.002
07
0.0000
2.807E-
0.002
07
0.0000
2.735E-
0.002
07
0.0000
2.667E-
0.002
07
7-114
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.000
0.000
41995.3
2.896E+09
0.0000
2.540E-
0.002
07
0.0000
2.424E-
0.002
07
0.0000
2.319E-
0.002
07
0.0000
2.222E-
0.002
07
0.0000
2.134E-
0.002
07
0.0000
2.051E-
0.002
07
0.0000
1.975E-
0.002
07
0.0000
1.905E-
0.001
07
0.0000
1.839E-
0.001
07
9
1.000
0.000
43995.2
3.034E+09
2
1.000
0.000
45993.7
3.171E+09
9
1.000
0.000
47991.1
3.309E+09
8
1.000
0.000
49990.5
3.447E+09
5
1.000
0.000
51989.8
3.585E+09
4
1.000
0.000
53989.7
3.723E+09
5
1.000
0.000
55989.4
3.861E+09
0
1.000
0.000
57988.7
3.998E+09
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
7-115
Figure 7.57. Graphs of Snw, Sw and Snw versus pore throat radius for
Example 7.3.
Columns 8 and 9 of Table 7.9 show the probability density functions for the
pore volume and pore throat radius distributions calculated with the 5-point
central difference formula of Akima. For the pore radius distribution, R 2 was
found to be 0.003284. Figures 7.58 and 7.59 show the graphs of the
probability density functions for pore volume and pore radius distributions.
7-116
Figure 7.58. Probability density function for pore volume distribution for
Example 7.3.
Figure 7.59. Probability density function for pore throat radius distribution
assuming a bundle of capillary tubes model for the sample of Example 7.3.
7-117
7-118
7-119
7-120
( R) ,
where R is the pore throat radius. Then, for the porous medium,
( R)dR 1
(7.132)
( R)dR . The
number of pores with radii between R and R+dR is N ( R)dR , where N is the
total number of pores making up the porous medium. The cross-sectional
area of the pores with radii between R and R+dR is given by
dAc
R 2 N ( R)dR
(7.133)
Ac
AT
N R 2 ( R)dR
0
7-121
(7.134)
is the
R2
R 2 ( R)dR
a constant
(7.135)
Ac
NR 2
(7.136)
AT
The volumetric flow rate for pores with radii between R and R+dR is
given by Hagen-Poiseuilles law as
dq
where
R2
8 ( R)
R 2 N ( R)dR
P
L
(7.137)
medium. Note that the tortuosity is a function of the pore throat size, R. The
wetting phase occupies the pores with radii less than R. The volumetric flow
rate of the wetting phase is obtained by integrating Eq.(7.137) as
R
qw
N P R 4 ( R)
dR
8 w L 0 ( R)
(7.138)
kw
qw w L
AT P
N
8 AT
R 4 ( R)
dR
( R)
7-122
(7.139)
Vp
NL R 2 ( R)dR
AT L
NLR 2
(7.140)
At capillary equilibrium, the wetting phase occupies all the pores with radii
less than R corresponding to the capillary pressure given by
2 cos
R
Pc ( S w )
(7.141)
NL R 2 ( R)dR
Vw
(7.142)
R
2
Vw
Vp
Sw
R 2 ( R)dR
R ( R)dR
0
R2
R ( R)dR
(7.143)
R Sw
r 2 (r )dr
( R)dR
(7.144)
R2
dS w
dR
d
r 2 (r )dr
dR 0
7-123
(7.145)
The right side of Eq.(7.145) can be evaluated using Leibnitzs rule for
differentiating a definite integral as follows:
R
d
r 2 (r )dr
dR 0
dR
d0
0 (0)
R ( R)
dR
dR
r 2 (r )
dr
(7.146)
The integrand of the integral on the right side of Eq.(7.146) is zero. Therefore,
Eq.(7.146) simplifies to
R
d
r 2 (r )dr
dR 0
R 2 ( R)
(7.147)
R 2 ( R)dR
R2
dS w
(7.148)
kw
R2
dS w
( R)
(7.149)
The R in Eq.(7.149) is the largest pore size filled with the wetting phase. This
can be obtained from the capillary pressure curve as
cos
Pc ( S w )
7-124
(7.150)
( R)
where a and
a
R
(7.151)
kw
2 cos
Sw
8a
dS w
Pc 2
(7.152)
Let
2 cos
8a
dS w
Pc 2
(7.153)
= 0 and 1/a = F1. Substituting these values into Eq.(7.153) gives the
2 cos
F1
dS w
Pc 2
0
(7.154)
k 10.6566
cos
F1
0
7-125
dS w
Pc 2
(7.155)
= 140. Substituting
k 1.441x106 F1
0
dS w
Pc 2
(7.156)
measure but were estimated to be less than 0.1 md. The calculated lithology
factors ranged from 0.085 to 0.363, with an average value of 0.216. He
suggested the use of the average value of 0.216 for estimating the
permeability of a rock from its drainage capillary pressure curve. However, as
shown in Figure 7.62, there is a positive correlation between the lithology
factor and permeability. Clearly, the higher the permeability, the higher the
lithology factor. Similarly, the lower the permeability, the lower the lithology
factor. The lithology factor is related to the reciprocal of the tortuosity of the
porous medium. Therefore, the positive correlation between the lithology
factor and permeability is to be expected. Because of this correlation, the use
of the average lithology factor of 0.216 to calculate the permeability of all
porous media can lead to poor estimates of permeability. Figure 7.63
compares the measured permeability with the calculated permeability using
the average lithology factor of 0.216 plotted on log scales. The correlation
between the two sets of data appears very strong. However, when the same
data are plotted on linear scales as shown in Figure 7.64, the correlation is
weaker than in Figure 7.63.
Table 7.10. Lithology factors for various core samples (Purcell, 1949).
7-126
Lithology
Calculated
Permeability
Sample
Permeability
Factor
Using F1 = 0.216
No
(md)
1.2
0.085
3.04
12
0.122
21.2
13.4
0.168
17.3
36.9
0.149
53.5
57.4
0.200
61.9
70.3
0.165
91.6
110
0.257
92.3
116
0.256
97.5
144
0.191
163
10
336
0.107
680
11
430
0.216
430
12
439
0.273
348
13
496
0.276
388
14
772
0.185
902
15
1070
0.282
816
16
1459
0.363
865
(md)
17
0.003
18
0.1
19
35.7
0.182
42.2
20
40.2
0.158
54.9
21
184
0.231
172
22
235
0.276
183
23
307
0.215
308
24
320
0.163
422
25
506
0.284
383
26
634
0.272
502
27
1150
0.338
734
7-127
Example 7.4
Estimate the permeability of the sample of Example 7.3 using the mercury
injection capillary pressure data of Table 7.9.
Solution to Example 7.4
Table 7.11 presents the calculated results. Figure 7.65 shows the graphs of Pc
and
1
versus S w . The integration called for in Eq.(7.156) was performed with
Pc2
dS w
Pc2
7-129
value of 0.048 md. Thus, the low lithology factor of 0.085 gives a better
estimate of the permeability than the average value of 0.216 for this tight
sample.
Figure 3.30 gives a correlation between tortuosity and porosity based on
the experimental data of Winsauer et al. (1952). The equation of the
regression line is
27.35
10.987
For the sample with a porosity of 0.056, the tortuosity predicted by the
regression line is 9.4554. Therefore, the lithology factor (1/ ) predicted by the
correlation is 0.1058. Using the this value of the lithology factor in Eq.(7.156)
gives the estimated permeability as
permeability of 0.048 md. This estimate also is better than that based on the
average lithology factor of 0.216.
1
Pc2
Pc
Sw
psi
1.000
124.919
0.969
1/ psi 2
150.747
Sw
1
dS w
Pc2
1/ psi 2
6.408E-
0.000E+0
05
4.401E-
1.687E-06
05
0.932
175.428
3.249E-
3.104E-06
05
0.896
200.401
2.490E-
4.124E-06
05
0.832
249.768
1.603E-
5.434E-06
05
0.771
300.121
1.110E-
6.266E-06
05
0.670
400.203
6.244E-
7.143E-06
06
0.572
499.515
4.008E-
7.646E-06
06
0.487
599.278
2.784E-
7.934E-06
06
0.423
699.359
2.045E-
8.088E-06
06
0.375
799.133
1.566E-
8.174E-06
06
0.340
899.290
1.237E-
8.223E-06
06
0.314
999.184
1.002E-
8.253E-06
06
0.291
1098.894
8.281E-
8.274E-06
07
0.270
1198.443
6.962E-
8.290E-06
07
0.252
1298.503
5.931E-
7-131
8.302E-06
07
0.235
1398.241
5.115E-
8.311E-06
07
0.220
1498.239
4.455E-
8.318E-06
07
0.206
1598.665
3.913E-
8.324E-06
07
0.194
1695.092
3.480E-
8.328E-06
07
0.182
1797.317
3.096E-
8.332E-06
07
0.171
1895.866
2.782E-
8.335E-06
07
0.162
2000.983
2.498E-
8.338E-06
07
0.144
2196.945
2.072E-
8.342E-06
07
0.129
2396.980
1.740E-
8.345E-06
07
0.115
2597.892
1.482E-
8.347E-06
07
0.103
2799.027
1.276E-
8.349E-06
07
0.093
2997.379
1.113E-
8.350E-06
07
0.082
3248.154
9.478E-
8.351E-06
08
0.072
3495.865
8.183E-
8.352E-06
08
0.063
3744.603
7.132E-
8.353E-06
08
0.056
3996.642
6.261E-
8.353E-06
08
0.050
4246.843
5.545E-
7-132
8.353E-06
08
0.044
4494.100
4.951E-
8.354E-06
08
0.040
4745.567
4.440E-
8.354E-06
08
0.035
4997.241
4.004E-
8.354E-06
08
0.032
5245.841
3.634E-
8.354E-06
08
0.028
5496.453
3.310E-
8.354E-06
08
0.025
5746.203
3.029E-
8.354E-06
08
0.022
5994.055
2.783E-
8.355E-06
08
0.019
6246.104
2.563E-
8.355E-06
08
0.017
6497.474
2.369E-
8.355E-06
08
0.015
6744.532
2.198E-
8.355E-06
08
0.013
6996.476
2.043E-
8.355E-06
08
0.010
7497.188
1.779E-
8.355E-06
08
0.008
7997.178
1.564E-
8.355E-06
08
0.005
8494.954
1.386E-
8.355E-06
08
0.003
8995.378
1.236E-
8.355E-06
08
0.002
9495.550
1.109E-
8.355E-06
08
0.001
9996.479
1.001E-
7-133
8.355E-06
08
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
10496.00
9.077E-
09
10997.02
8.269E-
09
11495.55
7.567E-
09
11996.47
6.949E-
09
12495.53
6.405E-
09
12996.07
5.921E-
09
13495.10
5.491E-
09
13995.90
5.105E-
09
14495.68
4.759E-
09
14996.19
4.447E-
09
15495.97
4.164E-
09
15995.13
3.909E-
09
16495.52
3.675E-
09
16995.27
3.462E-
09
17495.33
3.267E-
09
17995.50
3.088E-
09
18495.94
2.923E-
7-134
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
09
18996.36
2.771E-
09
19495.32
2.631E-
09
19995.73
2.501E-
09
20995.31
2.269E-
09
21995.79
2.067E-
09
22995.64
1.891E-
09
23995.72
1.737E-
09
24996.34
1.600E-
09
25994.96
1.480E-
09
26995.65
1.372E-
09
27995.66
1.276E-
09
28996.07
1.189E-
09
29995.49
1.111E-
09
30996.21
1.041E-
09
31995.52
9.768E-
10
32996.19
9.185E-
10
33996.57
8.652E-
7-135
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
10
34996.16
8.165E-
10
35996.32
7.718E-
10
36995.53
7.306E-
10
37996.39
6.927E-
10
38996.37
6.576E-
10
39995.75
6.251E-
10
41995.39
5.670E-
10
43995.21
5.166E-
10
45993.78
4.727E-
10
47991.17
4.342E-
10
49990.55
4.002E-
10
51989.83
3.700E-
10
53989.75
3.431E-
10
55989.39
3.190E-
10
57988.76
2.974E-
10
59988.26
2.779E-
10
7-136
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
8.355E-06
1
versus S w for Example 7.4.
Pc2
7-137
Sw
krw ( S w )
kw
k
dS w
Pc 2
0
1
dS w
Pc 2
(7.157)
krnw ( S w )
knw
k
Sw
1
If
dS w
Pc 2
dS w
Pc 2
(7.158)
krw ( S w )
kw
k
0
1
dS w
Pc 2
dS w
Pc 2
(7.159)
and
1
krnw ( S w )
knw
k
dS w
Pc 2
Sw
1
dS w
Pc 2
(7.160)
porous medium has been neglected. In fact, the tortuosity of the medium in
the presence of multiphase fluids is a function of saturation. Furthermore, the
models do not allow for residual saturations of the wetting and non-wetting
phases. These defects of the models will be corrected in Chapter 8 to derive
more realistic relative permeability curves from drainage capillary pressure
curves.
simply
reservoir
performance
calculations,
especially
in
numerical
Pc
dPc
or
. Therefore, an analytical model will allow
xD
dS w
ln S w*
ln Pc
or
7-139
ln Pe
(7.161)
ln Pc
ln S w* ln Pe
(7.162)
S w S wirr
1 S wirr
S w*
(7.163)
the slopes of the straight lines. It should be observed from Eq.(7.162) that
controls the slope of the linear capillary pressure plot. A large value of
gives
which corresponds to the capillary pressure curve for a wide pore size
distribution. Thus, small values of
whereas large values of
. In view of these
Eqs.(7.161) and (7.162) give a drainage capillary pressure model of the form
1
Pe S w*
Pc
(7.164)
Brooks and Corey also proposed an imbibition capillary pressure model of the
form
1
Pc
Pe
Se
7-140
(7.165)
Se
S w S wirr
1 S wirr Snwr
(7.166)
where Snwr is the residual non-wetting phase saturation. To fit this model to
measured drainage capillary pressure data, a log-log plot of the drainage
capillary pressure data is made either as ln S w* versus ln Pc or as ln Pc versus
ln S w* . If the plot is nonlinear, then S wirr is adjusted until the plot is linear. Pe is
determined from the linear log-log plot at S w* 1 and
slope of the straight line. The two parameters are then substituted into
Eqs.(7.164) and (7.165) to calculate the drainage and imbibition capillary
pressure curves.
Example 7.5
1.
2.
Table 7.12. Air-Water Drainage Capillary Pressure Data for Example 7.5.
Drainag
e
7-141
Pc
Sw
psi
1.000
1.973
0.950
2.377
0.900
2.840
0.850
3.377
0.800
4.008
0.750
4.757
0.700
5.663
0.650
6.781
0.600
8.195
0.550
10.039
0.500
12.547
0.450
16.154
0.400
21.787
0.350
31.817
0.300
54.691
0.278
78.408
7-142
7-143
ln Pc
2.1443ln S w*
ln 2.2238
Therefore,
2.1443
0.4664
Pe
2.2238
7-144
Pc
Pe S w*
2.2238 S w*
2.1443
2.
7-146
Table 7.13. Calculated Results with the Brooks-Corey Model for Example 7.5.
Original
Data
Brooks-Corey Model
Drainage
Pc
Drainage
Imbibition
Pc
Pc
Sw
psi
S w*
1.000
1.973
1.000
2.224
0.950
2.377
0.944
2.514
0.900
2.840
0.889
2.863
0.850
3.377
0.833
3.288
0.800
4.008
0.778
3.812
0.750
4.757
0.722
0.700
5.663
0.667
psi
Se
psi
4.468
1.000
0.000
5.305
0.923
0.416
7-147
0.650
6.781
0.611
6.393
0.846
0.958
0.600
8.195
0.556
7.843
0.769
1.679
0.550
10.039
0.500
9.831
0.692
2.669
0.500
12.547
0.444
12.656
0.615
4.075
0.450
16.154
0.389
16.851
0.538
6.163
0.400
21.787
0.333
23.452
0.462
9.448
0.350
31.817
0.278
34.672
0.385
15.032
0.300
54.691
0.222
55.947
0.308
25.620
0.278
78.408
0.198
71.829
0.274
33.524
0.250
0.167
103.678
0.231
49.374
0.200
0.111
247.331
0.154
120.867
0.150
0.056
1093.394
0.077
541.933
0.100
0.000
0.000
7-148
*
w
1
1
Pc
(7.167)
7-149
Data
Model
Pc
Sw
(psi)
S w*
S w*
Sw
0.20
50.0
0.000
0.000
0.200
0.24
39.0
0.050
0.006
0.205
0.25
38.0
0.063
0.012
0.210
0.28
35.0
0.100
0.065
0.252
0.30
34.0
0.125
0.100
0.280
0.35
32.0
0.188
0.199
0.359
0.40
30.0
0.250
0.332
0.466
0.50
28.5
0.375
0.444
0.555
0.56
28.0
0.450
0.481
0.585
0.60
27.8
0.500
0.496
0.597
0.68
27.0
0.600
0.555
0.644
0.70
26.8
0.625
0.569
0.655
0.70
26.8
0.625
0.569
0.655
0.75
26.0
0.688
0.625
0.700
0.80
24.8
0.750
0.701
0.761
0.85
23.0
0.813
0.798
0.838
0.90
21.0
0.875
0.877
0.902
0.95
18.0
0.938
0.949
0.959
1.00
13.5
1.000
0.991
0.993
7-150
branches of the pore doublet. The problem is to determine which of the two
interfaces in the capillary tubes will arrive at the outlet first (Point B). We will
assume that once the interface in one of the capillary tubes has arrived at B,
the non-wetting phase in the other tube will be trapped. To determine which
interface will arrive at B first, we need to derive the expressions for the
velocities of the interfaces as a function of the relevant parameters of the
model. Although it is not necessary to do so, let us assume that the wetting
and non-wetting phases have the same viscosity to simplify the analysis.
Figure 7.73. Pore doublet model. (a) in a porous medium; (b) capillary tubes
approximation.
PA
PB
PA
Pw
Pw
Pnw
Pnw
(7.168)
PB
where Pw and Pnw are the pressures on either side of the interface. From
Hagen-Poisseuille's law,
q1
r14 PA Pw
L1
8
(7.169)
q1
r14 Pnw PB
L L1
8
(7.170)
where L1 is the distance of the interface from the inlet end and L is the total
length of the pore doublet from A to B. Substituting Eqs.(7.169) and (7.170)
into Eq.(7.168) and noting that (Pnw - Pw) is the capillary pressure gives
PA
PB
8q1 L
r14
Pc1
(7.171)
Pc 2
(7.172)
PA
PB
8q2 L
r24
8 L
q2
r24
Pc 2
Pc1
2 cos
1
r2
1
r1
(7.173)
where the Laplace equation has been used to replace the capillary pressures.
Assuming incompressible fluids,
q1 q2
7-153
(7.174)
q1
q2
8 L
q 2 cos
r24
8 L
r14
1
r2
1
r1
1
r2
1
r1
8 L
r24
8 L
q 2 cos
r14
8 L
r14
8 L
r24
(7.175)
(7.176)
q2
q1
r2
r1
r24 cos
4 L
q
q
r24 cos
4 L
1
r2
1
r2
1
r1
1
r1
(7.177)
v1
q1
r12
(7.178)
v2
q2
r22
(7.179)
r2
r1
(7.180)
Let
7-154
q L
r cos
N vcap
(7.181)
3
1
Substituting Eqs.(7.178) through (7.181) into (7.177) gives the ratio of the
interface velocities as
v2
v1
4 N vcap
4 N vcap
1
1
(7.182)
v2
v1
(7.183)
N vcap
1
1
(7.184)
If
v2
v1
(7.185)
7-155
N vcap
(7.186)
N vcapcritical
1
1
(7.187)
low, the displacement will be dominated by capillary forces and the nonwetting phase will be trapped in the larger pore resulting in a low
displacement efficiency. If q is high, the displacement will be dominated by
the viscous forces and the non-wetting phase will be trapped in the smaller
pore resulting in a high displacement efficiency. These observations are in
qualitative agreement with macroscopic observations in corefloods. Figure
7.74 shows the breakthrough oil recovery as a function of v L obtained by
Rapoport and Leas (1953). The breakthrough oil recovery here is the oil
recovery at the time of water arrival at the outlet end of the core. As such, it is
a measure of the displacement efficiency. It should be observed that v L is
directly proportional to the macroscopic version of
7-156
Figure 7.74. Breakthrough oil recovery versus Rapaport and Leas scaling
coefficient, v L (Rapoport and Leas, 1953).
If
v2
v1
(7.188)
the domination of the displacement by the capillary forces will be strong that
the interface in the larger pore will retract resulting in the trapping of the
non-wetting phase in the larger pore and low displacement efficiency.
Substituting Eq.(7.182) into (7.188) gives the condition for this to happen as
7-157
N vcap
1
1
1
4
(7.189)
q L
A cos k
(7.190)
7-158
Aspect Ratio
D1
D2
(7.191)
where D1 and D2 are the pore body diameter and the pore throat diameter,
respectively. In Figure 7.75a, the aspect ratio is low and the oil is displaced
through the pore without trapping. In Figure 7.75b, the aspect ratio is high
and the oil suffers capillary instability and snaps off at the pore throat and be
trapped.
7-159
Pcn
1
rn
1
rt
2
rf
(7.192)
7-160
PB'
PB
2 cos
r1
(7.193)
PA'
PA
2 cos
r2
(7.194)
PB'
PB
PA'
PA
2 cos
7-161
1
r1
1
r2
(7.195)
7-162
or
PA
Because PB'
PB'
PB
PA'
1
r1
2 cos
1
r2
(7.196)
PA
PB
2 cos
1
r1
1
r2
(7.197)
PB
L
2 cos
L
1
r1
1
r2
(7.198)
r1 10 m
7-163
r2
50 m
L 50 m
30 dynes / cm
0
kw
500 md
1 cp
vw 1 ft / day
The pressure gradient required to mobilize the droplet is given by
PA
PB
L
2 30
50 x10
1
100
10 x10
1
100
50 x10
100
1
1.0133 x106
or
PA
PB
L
4243.73 psi / ft
P
L
1 1
0.001127 5.615 500
0.32 psi / ft
We see that the pressure gradient generated by the waterflood is not sufficient
to mobilize the oil droplet. Therefore, it will remain trapped.
7-164
PoA
PwA
2
rH
(7.199)
PoB
PwB
2
rB
(7.200)
PwB
PwA
gh
7-165
(7.201)
7-166
PoB
PoA
(7.202)
gh
PwB
PoA
PwA
gh
(7.203)
PoA
PwA
gh
2
rB
(7.204)
Substituting Eq.(7.204) into (7.199) gives the condition for upward migration
as
gh
2
rB
2
rH
(7.205)
1
g rH
1
rB
(7.206)
or
2
h
w
Let
rH
10 m
rB
50 m
30 dynes / cm
w = 1.00 g/cm3
7-167
o = 0.70 g/cm3
The minimum length of the blob to continue its upward migration is given by
2 30
1 0.70 981
1
10 x10
1
100
50 x10
100
163.1 cm
7-168
7-169
NOMENCLATURE
A
Bo =
Bw =
do =
fw
fw
fnw =
fnw2 =
fo
f(R) =
Fw =
F1 =
lithology factor
gravitational acceleration
Leverett J-function
ko =
kw =
kg =
kro =
krw =
krg =
krw =
length
M =
mobility ratio
ME =
NpD =
pressure
Pc =
capillary pressure
Pc1 =
Pd =
displacement pressure
Pe =
Pg =
Pnw=
Po =
Pw =
Pw =
qo =
qg =
qnw=
qw =
qw =
rm
r1 , r2 =
r1 , r2 =
distance of inlet end and outlet end of core from the center of
rotation in a centrifuge
Se =
Sg =
gas saturation
So =
oil saturation
Sor =
Sw =
water saturation
Sw =
Snw=
Snwr =
7-172
S w* =
time
tD
dimensionless time
vw =
vnw =
xD =
dimensionless distance
density of water
nw
interfacial tension
contact angle
viscosity
g =
=
gas viscosity
oil viscosity
w =
water viscosity
w =
nw=
(R) =
porosity, fraction
tortuosity
7-173
P =
pressure drop
Pw =
pore structure
Materials, DOE/BETC/IC-79/5,
2216, 1980.
Douglas, J., Jr., Blair, P.M. and Wagner, R.J. : Calculation of Linear
Waterflood Behavior Including the Effects of Capillary Pressure, Trans.,
AIME (1958) 213, 96-102.
Dullien, F.A.L. : Effects of Pore Structure on Capillary and Flow Phenomena
in Sandstones, J. Cnd. Pet. Tech. (July-Sept. 1975) 48-55.
Dullien, F.A.L. : Porous Media - Fluid Transport and Pore Structure, Academic
Press, New York, 1979.
Forbes, P., Chardaire-Riviere, C., Deflandre, F. and Flcury, M. : Local
Saturation Measurement While Centrifuging (MWC) for Improving
Centrifuge Capillary-Pressure Curve Determination, SCA Conference
Paper Number 9215 (1992).
Gardescu, I.I. : Behavior of Gas Bubbles in Capillary Spaces, Trans., AIME
(1930) 351-370.
Gharbi, R. and Peters, E.J. : Scaling Coreflood Experiments to Heterogeneous
Reservoirs, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 10, (1993)
83-95.
Garnes, J.M., Mathisen, A.M., Scheie, A. and Skauge, A. : "Capillary Number
Relations for Some North Sea Reservoir Sandstones," SPE/DOE 20264,
Presented at the SPE/DOE Seventh Symposium on Enhanced Oil
Recovery, Tulsa, April 22-25, 1990.
Graue, A., Kolltvelt, K., Lien, J.R. and Skauge, A. : "Imaging Fluid Saturation
Development in Long-Core Flood Displacements," SPE Formation
Evaluation (December 1990) 406-412.
Hassler, G.L. and Brunner, E. : Measurement of Capillary Pressures in Small
Core Samples, Trans., AIME (1945) 160, 114-123.
Haughey, D.P. and Beveridge, G.S.G. : "Structural Properties of Packed Beds A Review, Can. J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 47 (April 1969) 130-149.
Hermansen, H., Eliassen, O., Guo, Y. and Skjaeveland, S.M. : "Capillary
Pressure From Centrifuge - A New Direct Method," Advance in Core
Evaluation II, EuroCAS, London, May 20-22, 1991.
Jennings, H.Y. : Surface Properties of Natural and Synthetic Porous Media,
Producers Monthly (March 1957) 20-24.
Jennings, H.J. : How to Handle and Process Soft and Unconsolidated Cores,
World Oil (June 1965) 116-119.
Keelan, D.K. : "A Critical Review of Core Analysis Techniques The Jour. Can.
Pet. Tech. (April-June 1972) 42-55.
7-176
Killins, C.R., Nielsen, R.F. and Calhoun, J.C., Jr.: Capillary Desaturation and
Imbibition in Rocks, Producers Monthly (February 1953) 18, No. 2, 3039.
Klute, A. : "Water Retention: Laboratory Methods," Methods of Soil Analysis,
Part 1, A. Klute (Ed.), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI
(1986) 635-686.
Klute, A. : "Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods,"
Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, A. Klute (Ed.), American Society of
Agronomy, Madison, WI (1986) 687-734.
Kyte, J.R. and Rapoport, L.A. : Linear Waterflood Behavior and End Effects in
Water-Wet Porous Media, Trans., AIME (1958) 213, 423-426.
Laidlaw, W.G. and Wardlaw, N.C. : "A Theoretical and Experimental
Investigation of Trapping in Pore Doublets," Canadian J. Chemical
Engineering, Vol. 61 (October 1983) 719-727.
Lake, L.W. : Enhanced Oil Recovery, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey, 1989.
Land, C.S. : "Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and
Three-Phase Flow From Rock Properties, SPEJ (June 1968) 149-156.
Leij, F.J., Russell, W.B. and Lesch, S.M. : Closed-Form Expressions for Water
Retention and Conductivity Data, Ground Water Vol. 35, No. 5 (1997)
848-858.
Leva, M., Weintraub, M., Grummer, M. Pollchick, M. and Storch, H.H. : "Fluid
Flow Through Packed and Packed and Fluidized Systems," US Bureau
of Mines Bull. No. 504, 1951.
Leverett, M.C. : Flow of Oil-Water Mixtures through Unconsolidated Sands,
Trans., AIME (1939) 140, xxx-xxx.
Leverett, M.C. : Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids, Trans., AIME (1941)
142, 152-169.
Majors, P.D., Li, P. and Peters, E.J. : "NMR Imaging of Immiscible
Displacements in Porous Media, Society of Petroleum Engineers
Formation Evaluation (September 1997) 164-169.
Marle, C.M. : Multiphase Flow in Porous Media, Gulf Publishing Company,
Houston, Texas, 1981.
Melrose, J.C. : Role of Capillary Forces in Determining Microscopic
Displacement Efficiency for Oil Recovery by Waterflooding, J. Cnd Pet.
Tech. (Oct.-Dec. 1974) 54-62.
Melrose, J.C. : Interpretation of Centrifuge Capillary Pressure Data, The Log
Analyst (January-February 1988) 40-47.
7-177
7-180
7-181
CHAPTER 8
RELATIVE PERMEABILITY
In
ko A
o
qw
kw A
w
Po
x
Pw
x
8-1
g sin
(8.1)
g sin
(8.2)
kg A
qg
Pg
where
(8.3)
g sin
Pw
Pc / ow S w
(8.4)
Pg
Po
Pc / go So
(8.5)
Pc / ow
Pc / go
(8.6)
Pc / gw
permeability
by
base
permeability
such
as
the
absolute
permeability of the porous medium. Thus, for the three phase example, using
the absolute permeability of the porous medium as the base permeability, the
relative permeabilities to oil, water and gas are given by
kro
ko
k
(8.7)
krw
kw
k
(8.8)
krg
kg
(8.9)
kkro A
o
Po
x
8-2
g sin
(8.10)
qw
kkrw A
w
qg
kkrg A
g
Pw
x
g sin
(8.11)
g sin
(8.12)
Pg
x
2.
3.
4.
8-3
5.
The relative permeability curves are not defined in the saturation ranges
given by 1 S nwr
6.
S w 1 and 0
Sw
S wirr .
Sw
1 S nwr .
8-4
8-5
permeability measurement, the test starts with the core initially saturated
with an irreducible wetting phase saturation (Swirr) and a non-wetting phase
saturation of (1-Swirr). Then a mixture of the two phases is injected into the
inlet face of the core at a fixed ratio of
qnw
until steady state is achieved.
qw
Steady state is achieved when the pressure drop across the core no longer
changes with time and the ratio of the produced fluids is the same and the
ratio of the injected fluids. The steady state pressure drop across the core and
8-6
the injection rate of each phase are measured. The relative permeabilities are
calculated with the integrated forms of Darcy's law for two phase flow as
shown later. The saturations are usually calculated by material balance.
At steady state, the continuity equations for the wetting and nonwetting phases for horizontal flow are
vw
x
(8.13)
vnw
x
(8.14)
vw
k w Pw
x
w
vnw
knw Pnw
x
nw
a constant
a constant
(8.15)
(8.16)
Pw
Pc S w
(8.17)
v L
Pw
knw
Since Pc S w is uniform,
q L
A Pw
w w
kw
v L
Pnw
nw nw
Pw and
w w
(8.18)
q L
A Pnw
(8.19)
nw nw
the core can be measured in either phase and used to calculate the effective
8-7
dS w
dxD
fw
1
Fw
dJ
N cap krnw
dS w
(7.83)
with a specified inlet boundary condition. Of course, to do so, krw , krnw and
Pc S w must be known.
qw
qnw
Install the clean, dry core sample in the Hassler apparatus as shown in
Figure 8.3.
Displace the wetting phase with the non-wetting phase until no more
wetting phase flows from the core.
phase
saturation
and
the
initial
phase
saturation.
Measure the steady state pressure drop and the non-wetting phase
8-8
krnw
3.
q L
kA Pnw
nw nw
(8.20)
Inject a mixture of the wetting and non-wetting phases at rates qnw and
qw such that the ratio, qw/qnw, is very much less than 1 until steady
state is achieved.
produced qw/qnw ratios are equal and the pressure drop no longer
changes with time.
4.
Measure the pressure drop and calculate the wetting phase saturation
by material balance. Calculate the relative permeabilities to the nonwetting and wetting phases at the latest wetting phase saturation using
Eq.(8.20) and (8.18) as
krw
5.
q L
kA Pw
w w
(8.21)
Increase the ratio qw/qnw and repeat steps 3 and 4 to calculate the
relative permeabilities at higher and higher wetting phase saturations.
6.
Finally, inject only the wetting phase until no more non-wetting phase
flows from the core.
saturation.
8-10
The various steady state methods such as the Penn State method,
single core dynamic method, dispersed feed method, Hafford method and
Hassler method differ primarily in the techniques used to minimize or
eliminate capillary end effect (Richardson et al., 1952). When capillary end
effect has been eliminated, all the steady state methods give the same results
as shown in Figures 8.6 and 8.7.
Figure 8.4. Steady state oil and gas pressure profiles at a relatively low
injection rate (Richardson et al., 1952).
8-11
Figure 8.5. Steady state oil and gas pressure profiles at a relatively high
injection rate (Richardson et al., 1952).
8-12
Figure 8.6. Relative permeability curves from six steady state methods, short
core section (Richardson et al., 1952).
8-13
Figure 8.7. Relative permeability curves from six steady state methods, long
core section (Richardson et al., 1952).
The
major
problem
with
the
steady
state
method
for
relative
It is not
qnw
Pnw
x
nw
qw
kkrw A
Pw
x
nw
g sin
g sin
(8.22)
(8.23)
Pw
(8.17)
Pc S w
(8.24)
qw qnw
The true fractional flows of the wetting and non-wetting phases are defined as
follows:
fw
f nw
qnw
q
qw
q
qw
qw qnw
qnw
qw qnw
1 fw
(8.25)
(8.26)
Sw
t
qw
x
8-15
(8.27)
Sw
(8.28)
Snw 1
qw w
kkrw A
qnw nw
kkrnw A
Pnw
x
Pw
x
8-16
nw
g sin
(8.29)
qw
q
kkrnw A
q nw
Pc
x
k
1 rnw
krw
nw
g sin
(8.30)
w
nw
1
k
1 rnw
krw
Fw
(8.31)
w
nw
Substituting Eqs.(8.30) and (8.31) into (8.25) gives the true fractional flow of
the wetting phase as
fw
Fw 1
kkrnw A
q nw
Pc
x
nw
(8.32)
g sin
xD
x
L
(8.33)
Pc S w
(8.34)
Substituting Eqs.(8.83) and (8.34) into (8.32) gives the true fractional flow of
the wetting phase as
fw
Fw 1
A cos k
q nw L
krnw
J
xD
krnw
8-17
kA
nw
nw
g sin
(8.35)
fw
J
xD
Fw 1 N cap krnw
krnw N g
(8.36)
N cap
A cos k
q nw L
(7.61)
and N g is given by
Ng
kA
g sin
nw
(8.37)
nw
M Sw
krw
krnw
nw
(8.38)
ME
kwr
knwr
nw
(8.39)
where kwr and knwr are the end-point relative permeabilities for the wetting and
non-wetting phases. The mobility ratio given in Eq.(8.39) is a characteristic
dimensionless number for the displacement that is independent of saturation.
Eq.(8.36) can also be written as
8-18
J
xD
1
1
M
1 N cap krnw
fw
krnw N g
(8.40)
Fw
(8.41)
1
1
M
2.
3.
4.
Gravity
is
beneficial
to
the
displacement
efficiency
for
up-dip
of the wetting phase (the injected fluid) by use of a polymer. This is the
basis for polymer flooding as an improved oil recovery technique.
6.
not apparent from the fractional flow equation. The fractional flow equation
indicates that the displacement efficiency can be improved by injecting the
wetting phase at a high enough rate to minimize capillary smearing of the
displacement front.
displacement.
The partial differential equation for the wetting phase saturation can be
derived as follows. Let
Sw
Sw
Fw krnw N g
krnw
dJ
dS w
(8.42)
(8.43)
f w Sw
Sw
N cap
Sw
Sw
xD
(8.44)
Sw
tD
fw
xD
tD
qt
A L
(8.45)
where t D is given by
(7.63)
Substituting Eq.(8.44) into (8.45) gives the partial differential equation for the
wetting phase saturation as
Sw
tD
Sw
d
dS w xD
N cap
xD
Sw
Sw
xD
(8.46)
Sw
tD
where the true fractional flow
df w S w
dS w xD
(8.47)
displacement is given by
8-21
dJ S w
dS w xD
1
1
M
1 N cap krnw
fw
(8.48)
Sw
,
xD
fw
(8.49)
Fw
Substituting Eq.(8.49) into (8.47) gives the partial differential equation for the
wetting phase saturation as
Sw
tD
dFw S w
dS w xD
(8.50)
dxD
dt D
Sw
xD
8-22
dS w
dt D
(8.51)
dFw
dS w
Sw
xD
dS w
dt D
(8.52)
dFw
dS w
dxD
dt D
dS w
dt D
(8.53)
(8.54)
Eq.(8.53) gives the characteristic path for the hyperbolic partial differential
equation given by Eq(8.54).
xDSw tD
xDSw
tD tD 0
dFw
dS w
(8.55)
If there was no prior injection, t D 0 will be zero and all the saturations from Swi
to (1 - Snwr) will be located at the inlet end of the system, making xDSw
equal
xDSw tD
tD
dFw
dS w
(8.56)
xD
tD
dFw
dS w
8-23
(8.57)
Qi t dFw
A dS w
(8.58)
Eq.(8.58) is usually referred to in the petroleum industry as the BuckleyLeverett frontal advance equation. It should be emphasized that Eq.(8.57) or
(8.58) applies to a particular wetting phase saturation. To determine the
dimensionless distance traveled by a particular saturation S w1 at time t D , we
use Eq.(8.57) to compute the distance as
xD
tD
dFw
dS w
(8.59)
S w1
xD
tD
dFw
dS w
df w
dS w
(8.60)
xD
, all the saturation profiles will collapse into one curve. If the
tD
f w Sw
Sw
S wirr
xD
dS w
tD
(8.61)
Given the relative permeability curves and the viscosity ratio, the
approximate fractional flow function and its derivative can be computed and
8-24
plotted as shown in Figure 8.9. In this figure, the S-shaped curve ADBC is
the approximate fractional flow curve (Fw) obtained from the relative
permeability curves and the viscosity ratio. The curve AFE is the derivative of
this function
dFw
. Using Eq.(8.59) and this derivative function, the distance
dS w
Sw
S wf where the
capillary pressure gradient is high and should not have been neglected.
To eliminate the multiple-valued solution, we appeal to physical reality
as follows. At time t, Qi(t) of wetting phase has been injected and the flood
front has traveled a distance x f into the medium. A volumetric balance of the
injected wetting phase can be used to calculate x f as follows:
Qi t
xf
0
A S w S wirr dx
(8.62)
Qi t
Ax f S wf
S wirr
Qi
S wf
1 Snwr
dFw
dS w
dS w
(8.63)
8-25
Figure 8.9. Approximate fractional flow function and its first derivative. Note
the tangent construction.
Figure 8.10. Calculated water saturation distribution based on the BuckleyLeverett approximation showing the discontinuity in saturation as required by
a material balance.
8-26
Ax f
Qi t
Fw S wf
S wf
S wirr
(8.64)
From the Buckley-Leverett frontal advance equation, Eq.(8.58), one can also
obtain
Ax f
Qi t
dFw
dS w
(8.65)
S wf
Fw S wf
S wf
S wf
S wirr
(8.66)
The saturation distribution in Figure 8.10 will be single valued if all the
saturations between Swirr and the frontal saturation, Swf, are eliminated.
Eq.(8.66) shows that the frontal saturation (Swf) is the saturation at which the
straight line passing through the point Sw = Swirr and Fw = 0 is tangent to the
approximate fractional flow curve, Fw. This line is shown in Figure 8.9 as AB.
This tangent construction was first suggested by Welge (1952). The effect of
the tangent construction is to correct the approximate fractional flow curve Fw
for the capillary term that was neglected to obtain the true fractional flow
curve fw. Such a correction is needed at the front (low wetting phase
saturation) where the capillary pressure gradient is high and should not have
been neglected. With the tangent construction correction in place, the true
fractional flow curve, fw, is now given by the curve ABC (Fig. 8.9) thereby
eliminating the S-shaped lower portion of Fw, which led to the tripple-valued
saturation solution of Figure 8.10. With this correction, the derivative of the
true fractional flow curve
df w
dS w
EFG (Fig. 8.9). After the tangent construction, the true fractional flow curve
and its derivative are given by
8-27
8-28
f w Sw
S w S wirr
Fw S wf
S wf S wirr
Fw S w for S wf
S w S wf
dFw
dS w
for S wirr
S wf
Sw
S wf
(8.67)
S w 1.0
and
df w
dS w
dFw
dS w
dFw
dS w
Sw
S wf
S wf
(8.68)
for S wf
S w 1.0
Sw
1 Fw S wf
S wf
S wav
S wf
(8.69)
S wf
1 Fw S wf
dFw
dS w
(8.70)
S wf
Before breakthrough, the average wetting phase saturation behind the front is
given by
8-29
1 Snwr
S wav
AxdS w
Ax f
(8.71)
Substituting Eq.(8.58) into (8.71) and integrating gives the average wetting
phase saturation behind the front as
S wav
S wf
1 Fw S wf
dFw
dS w
(8.72)
S wf
By this tangent
displacement performance can be predicted for a given set of wetting and nonwetting relative permeability curves and wetting and non-wetting viscosity
ratio.
8-30
S wav S wirr
1 S wirr
(8.73)
where R is the oil recovery as a fraction of the initial oil in place, Swav is the
average water saturation in the porous medium at the time of interest and
Swirr is the initial water saturation in the porous medium before water
injection which is assumed to be the irreducible water saturation. Thus, in
principle, the oil recovery can be calculated at any time by first calculating the
average water saturation in the porous medium at that time and applying
Eq.(8.73). However, depending on the stage of water injection, Eq.(8.73) may
not offer the most direct way to calculate the oil recovery. Let us examine the
waterflood performance at various stages of the flood.
Oil Recovery Before Water Breakthrough
Consider
constant
rate
water
injection
project.
Assuming
8-31
qBwt
Qi t
(8.74)
Qo t
where q is the constant water injection rate, in surface units, Bw is the water
formation volume factor, t is the time of interest before water breakthrough,
Qi is the cumulative water injected at time t in reservoir units and Qo
is
the cumulative oil produced at time t in reservoir units. The cumulative oil
produced at surface conditions is
qBwt
Bo
Qi t
Bo
Qo t
Bo
(8.75)
where Bo is the current oil formation volume factor. The oil recovery as a
fraction of the initial oil in place is given by
qBwt
AL 1 S wirr
Qi t
AL 1 S wirr
Wi
1 S wirr
(8.76)
qBwt df w
A dS w
Qi t
A
Sw
df w
dS w
(8.77)
Sw
qBwt df w
A dS w
S wf
Qi t
A
df w
dS w
(8.78)
S wf
qBwt df w
A dS w
Qi t
A
S wf
df w
dS w
(8.79)
S wf
Wi
qBwt
AL
Qi t
AL
1
df w
dS w
(8.80)
S wf
where Wi is the pore volume of water injected. The cumulative oil recovery at
water breakthrough is equal to the cumulative water injected in reservoir
volumes. The fractional oil recovery at water breakthrough is obtained from
Eq.(8.80) as
Wi
1 S wi
Qi t
AL 1 S wi
qBwt
AL 1 S wi
1
1 S wi
df w
dS w
(8.81)
S wf
tbt
qBw
(8.82)
S wf
or in dimensionless form as
1
t Dbt
df w
dS w
(8.83)
S wf
The average water saturation in the porous medium behind the displacement
front before and at water breakthrough is given by
1 Sor
S wav
AxdS w
Ax f
8-33
(8.71)
S wav
1 Sor
AS wf x f
AxdS w
S wf
Ax f
(8.84)
S wav
S wf
Qi t
1 Sor
S wf
dFw
Ax f
(8.85)
S wav
S wf
Qi t
f w 1 Sor
f w S wf
Ax f
(8.86)
S wav
Qi t 1 f w S wf
S wf
Ax f
(8.87)
Substituting Eq.(8.78) into (8.87) gives the average water saturation behind
the front as
S wav
S wf
1 f w S wf
df w
dS w
(8.72)
S wf
It should be observed in Figure 8.9 that the average water saturation behind
the front up until water breakthrough as given in Eq.(8.72) is the same as the
water saturation at which the tangent to the fractional flow curve intersects
the Fw = 1 axis. Thus, the average water saturation in the porous medium at
water breakthrough can easily be determined graphically. The average water
8-34
saturation can then be substituted into Eq.(8.73) to calculate the oil recovery
at water breakthrough. We can easily show that the result obtained by this
approach will be the same as that obtained by Eq.(8.81). Substituting
Eq.(8.72) into Eq.(8.73) gives
8-35
1 f w S wf
S wf
df w
dS w
S wirr
Swf
(8.88)
1 S wirr
From the equation of the tangent line in Figure 8.9, we find that
df w
dS w
f w S wf
S wf
S wf
(8.66)
S wirr
Substituting Eq.(8.66) into (8.88) gives the oil recovery at water breakthrough
as
1
(8.89)
df w
dS w
1 S wi
S wf
qBwt df w
A dS w
Qi t
A
Sw 2
df w
dS w
(8.90)
Sw 2
where Sw2 is the water saturation at the outlet end of the porous medium
which now lies between Swf and (1 Sor). Rearrangement of Eq.(8.90) gives
the pore volumes of water injected as
Wi
qBwt
AL
Qi t
AL
8-36
1
df w
dS w
(8.91)
Sw 2
where Wi is the pore volumes of water injected since the initiation of water
injection. Eq.(8.91) is analogous to Eq.(8.80) before breakthrough.
A material balance for the water after water breakthrough gives
L
Qi t
A Sw
(8.92)
S wirr dx Qw t
Qi t
A S w S wirr x
1 Sor
Sw 2
AxdS w
(8.93)
Qw t
Qi t
1 Sor
AL S w 2 S wirr
Sw 2
AxdS w
Qw t
(8.94)
Qw t
(8.95)
Qi t
AL S w 2 S wirr
Qi t
1 Sor
Sw 2
df w
Qi t
AL S w 2
S wirr
Qi t
f w 1 Sor
f w Sw2
Qw t
(8.96)
or
Qi t
AL S w 2
S wirr
Qi t 1 f w S w 2
Qw t
(8.97)
S wirr
Qi t
Qw t
AL
Qi t
1 f w Sw2
AL
8-37
(8.98)
Sw2
S wirr
N pD Wi 1 f w S w 2
(8.99)
Sw2
S wi Wi 1 f w S w 2
(8.100)
N pD
where NpD is the oil recovery as a fraction of the total pore volume. We observe
that the sum of the first two terms on the right hand side of Eq.(8.99) is the
average water saturation in the porous medium after water breakthrough.
Thus, Eq.(8.99) can be rewritten as
Sw2
S wav Wi 1 f w S w 2
(8.101)
Substituting Eq.(8.91) into (8.101) and rearranging gives the average water
saturation in the porous medium after water breakthrough as
S wav
Sw2
1 f w Sw2
df w
dS w
(8.102)
Sw 2
S wav
AS w 2 L
1 Sor
Sw 2
AL
AxdS w
(8.103)
8-38
S wav
Sw2
Qi t
1 Sor
Sw 2
df w
AL
(8.104)
S wav
Sw2
Qi t
f w 1 Sor
AL
f w Sw2
(8.105)
8-39
S wav
Sw2
Qi t 1 f w S w 2
AL
(8.106)
Substituting Eq.(8.90) into (8.106) gives the average water saturation after
water breakthrough as
S wav
Sw2
1 Fw S w 2
dFw
dS w
8-40
Sw 2
(8.107)
WOR
fw
Bw
qw
qo
fo
Bo
Bo
Fw
Bw 1 Fw
(8.108)
The pore volumes of water produced is given by material balance on the water
as
Water produced
Water stored
(8.109)
Wi
S wav
(8.110)
S wirr
Substituting Eq.(8.91) into (8.110) gives the pore volumes of water produced
as
Wp
1
df w
dS w
S wav
S wi
(8.111)
Sw 2
Example 8.1
A waterflood is to be performed in a linear reservoir. The relative permeability
curves for the reservoir are adequately described by the following analytical
models:
krw
k wr Se3
8-41
(8.112)
krnw
knwr 1 Se
(8.113)
where Se is defined as
Se
S w S wirr
1 S wirr Snwr
(8.114)
S wirr
0.20
S nwr
0.30
knwr
0.95
k wr
0.35
nw
Bo
10 cp
1 cp
1.20 RB/STB
Bw 1.0 RB/STB
1.
2.
3.
dFw
.
dS w
S wav
df w
.
dS w
8-42
fw
and its
4.
Plot the graphs of the true fractional flow curve and its derivative.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Calculate and plot the graph of oil recovery versus pore volume of water
injected before and after water breakthrough.
10.
Calculate and plot the graph of water oil ratio versus oil recovery.
Solution to Example 8.1
2.
Figure 8.17 shows the approximate fractional flow curve calculated with
Eq.(8.41) and its derivative calculated by differentiating Fw with respect
to Sw analytically.
Table 8.1. Calculated Results for Example 8.1.
tD
tD
tD
0.20
0.30
1.00
Sw
krw
krnw
Fw
dFw
dS w
fw
df w
dS w
xD
xD
xD
Wi
WOR
0.200
0.00000
0.950
0.00000
0.000
0.000
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.210
0.00000
0.912
0.00003
0.009
0.028
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.008
0.023
0.000
0.220
0.00002
0.876
0.00026
0.039
0.056
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.016
0.045
0.000
0.230
0.00008
0.839
0.00090
0.094
0.083
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.025
0.068
0.000
0.240
0.00018
0.804
0.00222
0.176
0.111
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.033
0.091
0.000
8-43
0.250
0.00035
0.770
0.00453
0.290
0.139
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.041
0.113
0.000
0.260
0.00060
0.736
0.00815
0.441
0.167
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.049
0.136
0.000
0.270
0.00096
0.703
0.01348
0.632
0.194
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.057
0.158
0.000
0.280
0.00143
0.670
0.02094
0.866
0.222
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.066
0.180
0.000
0.290
0.00204
0.639
0.03097
1.147
0.250
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.074
0.202
0.000
0.300
0.00280
0.608
0.04403
1.473
0.278
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.082
0.223
0.000
0.310
0.00373
0.578
0.06057
1.844
0.305
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.090
0.243
0.000
0.320
0.00484
0.549
0.08103
2.254
0.333
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.098
0.263
0.000
0.330
0.00615
0.520
0.10575
2.693
0.361
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.106
0.281
0.000
0.340
0.00768
0.492
0.13496
3.150
0.389
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.115
0.299
0.000
0.350
0.00945
0.466
0.16875
3.607
0.416
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.123
0.315
0.000
0.360
0.01147
0.439
0.20703
4.044
0.444
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.131
0.330
0.000
0.370
0.01376
0.414
0.24949
4.439
0.472
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.139
0.343
0.000
0.380
0.01633
0.389
0.29560
4.772
0.500
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.147
0.355
0.000
0.390
0.01921
0.365
0.34465
5.024
0.527
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.156
0.365
0.000
0.400
0.02240
0.342
0.39576
5.181
0.555
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.164
0.374
0.000
0.410
0.02593
0.320
0.44794
5.238
0.583
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.172
0.381
0.000
0.420
0.02981
0.298
0.50019
5.195
0.611
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.180
0.388
0.000
0.430
0.03407
0.277
0.55153
5.058
0.638
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.188
0.393
0.000
0.440
0.03871
0.257
0.60109
4.842
0.666
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.197
0.398
0.000
0.450
0.04375
0.238
0.64815
4.561
0.694
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.205
0.403
0.000
0.460
0.04921
0.219
0.69216
4.234
0.722
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.213
0.407
0.000
0.470
0.05511
0.201
0.73274
3.879
0.749
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.221
0.411
0.000
0.480
0.06147
0.184
0.76969
3.511
0.777
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.229
0.416
0.000
0.490
0.06829
0.168
0.80296
3.144
0.805
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.237
0.421
0.000
0.491
0.06900
0.166
0.80608
3.107
0.808
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.246
0.423
0.000
0.492
0.06971
0.164
0.80917
3.071
0.810
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.254
0.426
0.000
0.493
0.07043
0.163
0.81222
3.035
0.813
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.262
0.428
0.000
0.494
0.07115
0.161
0.81524
2.999
0.816
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.270
0.430
0.000
0.495
0.07188
0.160
0.81822
2.964
0.819
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.278
0.432
0.000
0.496
0.07262
0.158
0.82117
2.928
0.822
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.287
0.434
0.000
0.497
0.07335
0.157
0.82408
2.893
0.824
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.295
0.436
0.000
0.498
0.07410
0.155
0.82695
2.857
0.827
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.303
0.438
0.000
0.499
0.07485
0.154
0.82979
2.822
0.830
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.311
0.440
0.000
0.500
0.07560
0.152
0.83260
2.788
0.833
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.319
0.442
0.000
8-44
0.500
0.07568
0.152
0.83288
2.784
0.833
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.328
0.444
0.000
0.500
0.07575
0.152
0.83316
2.781
0.833
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.336
0.445
0.000
0.500
0.07583
0.152
0.83343
2.777
0.833
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.344
0.447
0.000
0.500
0.07583
0.152
0.83343
2.777
0.833
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.352
0.449
0.000
0.500
0.07586
0.151
0.83357
2.775
0.834
2.775
0.555
0.833
2.775
0.360
0.450
6.010
0.501
0.07636
0.150
0.83537
2.753
0.835
2.753
0.551
0.826
2.753
0.363
0.451
6.089
0.502
0.07712
0.149
0.83810
2.718
0.838
2.718
0.544
0.816
2.718
0.368
0.452
6.212
0.503
0.07789
0.147
0.84081
2.684
0.841
2.684
0.537
0.805
2.684
0.373
0.453
6.338
0.504
0.07866
0.146
0.84347
2.650
0.843
2.650
0.530
0.795
2.650
0.377
0.454
6.466
0.505
0.07944
0.144
0.84611
2.616
0.846
2.616
0.523
0.785
2.616
0.382
0.455
6.598
0.506
0.08023
0.143
0.84871
2.583
0.849
2.583
0.517
0.775
2.583
0.387
0.456
6.732
0.507
0.08102
0.142
0.85127
2.549
0.851
2.549
0.510
0.765
2.549
0.392
0.457
6.868
0.508
0.08181
0.140
0.85380
2.516
0.854
2.516
0.503
0.755
2.516
0.397
0.458
7.008
0.509
0.08261
0.139
0.85630
2.483
0.856
2.483
0.497
0.745
2.483
0.403
0.459
7.151
0.510
0.08341
0.137
0.85877
2.450
0.859
2.450
0.490
0.735
2.450
0.408
0.460
7.297
0.520
0.09175
0.123
0.88169
2.137
0.882
2.137
0.427
0.641
2.137
0.468
0.469
8.943
0.530
0.10062
0.110
0.90160
1.850
0.902
1.850
0.370
0.555
1.850
0.540
0.479
10.995
0.540
0.11005
0.097
0.91878
1.591
0.919
1.591
0.318
0.477
1.591
0.628
0.489
13.575
0.550
0.12005
0.086
0.93351
1.360
0.934
1.360
0.272
0.408
1.360
0.736
0.499
16.849
0.560
0.13064
0.074
0.94606
1.154
0.946
1.154
0.231
0.346
1.154
0.866
0.508
21.048
0.570
0.14183
0.064
0.95668
0.974
0.957
0.974
0.195
0.292
0.974
1.027
0.518
26.502
0.580
0.15364
0.055
0.96561
0.816
0.966
0.816
0.163
0.245
0.816
1.226
0.528
33.693
0.590
0.16609
0.046
0.97306
0.678
0.973
0.678
0.136
0.203
0.678
1.474
0.537
43.348
0.600
0.17920
0.038
0.97923
0.559
0.979
0.559
0.112
0.168
0.559
1.788
0.546
56.589
0.610
0.19298
0.031
0.98430
0.456
0.984
0.456
0.091
0.137
0.456
2.191
0.555
75.235
0.620
0.20745
0.024
0.98841
0.368
0.988
0.368
0.074
0.110
0.368
2.716
0.564
102.358
0.630
0.22262
0.019
0.99171
0.292
0.992
0.292
0.058
0.088
0.292
3.420
0.573
143.471
0.640
0.23852
0.014
0.99430
0.228
0.994
0.228
0.046
0.068
0.228
4.392
0.581
209.224
0.650
0.25515
0.009
0.99629
0.172
0.996
0.172
0.034
0.052
0.172
5.798
0.589
322.295
0.660
0.27254
0.006
0.99777
0.126
0.998
0.126
0.025
0.038
0.126
7.966
0.597
537.909
0.670
0.29070
0.003
0.99882
0.086
0.999
0.086
0.017
0.026
0.086
11.663
0.605
1020.015
0.680
0.30966
0.002
0.99951
0.052
1.000
0.052
0.010
0.016
0.052
19.193
0.612
2444.665
0.690
0.32942
0.000
0.99988
0.024
1.000
0.024
0.005
0.007
0.024
42.067
0.619
10402.648
0.700
0.35000
0.000
1.00000
0.000
1.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
8-45
8-46
Figure 8.17. Approximate fractional flow curve and its derivative for Example
8.1.
3.
S wf
df w
dS w
S wav
4.
0.500035
2.775
S wf
0.5603
The true fractional flow curve and its derivative obtained from the
tangent construction are shown in Figure 8.18.
8-47
Figure 8.18. True fractional flow curve and its derivative for Example 8.1.
5.
6.
krw /
/ krnw /
nw
3.68
8-48
7.
8.
df w
dS w
1
2.775
S wf
Rbt
1 S wirr
9.
df w
dS w
1
1 0.20 2.775
0.450
S wf
N pD
1 S wirr
10.
The producing water oil ratio is zero before water breakthrough. After
water breakthrough, the producing water oil water ratio is calculated
with Eq.(8.108). After breakthrough, the producing water oil ratio
increases rapidly as shown in Figure 8.21.
8-50
major
problem
with
the
steady
state
method
for
relative
In
this method, for an imbibition test, the core is first saturated with the nonwetting phase at irreducible wetting phase saturation as in the steady state
method. However, only the wetting phase is injected into the core to displace
the non-wetting phase.
breaks through at the outlet end of the core and over time a higher and higher
fraction of the total produced fluid is the wetting phase.
8-51
usually requiring a few hours to complete compared to several weeks for the
steady state method.
displacement
method
will
give
relative
permeability
curves
that
are
adverse
mobility
ratio
displacement.
favorable
mobility
ratio
technique
for
calculating
relative
permeability
curves
from
f nw 2
1
k
1 rw
krnw
8-52
(8.115)
nw
w
It should be noted that for saturations above Swf, Eq.(8.115) gives the true
fractional flow of the non-wetting phase because above Swf, the true fractional
flow and the approximate fractional curves are equal. Eq.(8.115) can be
rearranged to calculate the wetting-non-wetting phase relative permeability
ratio as
krw
krnw
nw
f nw 2
(8.116)
The fractional flow of the non-wetting phase at the outlet end of the core is
also given by
8-53
f nw 2
qnw
q
dQnw t
dN pD
dQi t
dWi
(8.117)
where Qnw(t) and Qi(t) are the cumulative non-wetting phase produced and
the cumulative wetting phase injected and N pD and Wi are their dimensionless
counterparts as fractions of the total pore volume. Eqs.(8.116) and (8.117)
were first presented by Welge (1952). It should be noted that these equations
give no useful information before breakthrough because the fractional flow of
the non-wetting phase at the outlet end of the core is 1 and the relative
permeability to wetting phase is zero. This is why the unsteady state relative
permeability method is limited to only post breakthrough wetting phase
saturations between Swf and 1-Snwr.
After wetting phase breakthrough, we need to associate the computed
relative permeability ratio with the wetting phase saturation at the outlet end
of the core, the point of observation.
saturation at the outlet end of the core, we perform a material balance for the
wetting phase after breakthrough to obtain
Sw2
S wirr
N pD Wi 1 Fw S w 2
(8.99)
Sw2
Using Eqs.(8.116) and (8.118),
S wirr
N pD Wi f nw 2
(8.118)
krw
versus S w 2 can be computed.
krnw
8-54
The
P
dx
x
(8.119)
kkrnw A P
x
nw
qnw
(8.120)
P
x
(8.121)
f nw
dx
krnw
(8.122)
Qi t
A
df w
dS w
(8.90)
Sw 2
x
L
f w'
f w' 2
(8.123)
where f w' and f w' 2 are the derivatives of the fractional flow functions at any
distance and at the core outlet, respectively. Differentiating Eq.(8.123) with
respect to f w' gives
dx
L
df w'
'
f w2
8-55
(8.124)
f nw '
df w
krnw
PkAf w' 2
q nw L
(8.125)
a constant
(8.126)
Let
q
P
kA
nw L
f w' 2
0
q
P
f nw '
df w
krnw
f w' 2
s
q
P
(8.127)
Ir
q
P
q
P
(8.128)
s
f w' 2
Ir
f nw '
df w
krnw
(8.129)
d
df w' 2
f w' 2
Ir
(8.130)
1
Wi I r
(8.131)
d
1
d
Wi
8-56
Eq.(8.131) can be used to calculate the relative permeability of the nonwetting phase as
krnw
f nw 2
d
1
d
Wi
1
Wi I r
(8.132)
nw
f nw 2
1 krnw
(8.133)
The advantage of the unsteady method over the steady state method of
relative permeability measurement is that it is considerably faster. Because
the method is based on the Buckley-Leverett displacement model, the
unsteady state method can only be used to calculate relative permeability
curves between Swf and the wetting phase saturation at the residual
nonwetting phase saturation (1-Snwr) as previously noted. If Swf is high as in
the case of a favorable mobility ratio displacement, then much of the relative
permeability curves cannot be obtained because one is limited to a very small
saturation observation window. To solve this problem, unfavorable mobility
ratio displacements are typically used to determine relative permeability
curves by the unsteady state method. Further, in order to minimize capillary
end effect, high displacement rates are also typically used. The combination
of high rate and adverse mobility ratio can lead to viscous instability that will
make the displacement performance to be rate sensitive. If this happens, the
relative permeability curves obtained by the unsteady state method will be
rate sensitive and can be quite different from the relative permeability curves
of the same porous medium obtained by the steady state method (Peters and
Khataniar, 1987).
8-57
Eqs.(8.117)
and
(8.132)
call
for
differentiating
the
measured
N pD
1
ln
Wi I r
A1
A2 ln Wi
B1
1
B2 ln
Wi
A3 ln Wi
1
B3 ln
Wi
(8.134)
2
(8.135)
Example 8.2
Table 8.2 gives the experimental data for an unsteady state relative
permeability measurement for a sandpack. In the experiment, water was used
to displace a viscous oil at a constant injection rate. The pore volume of water
injected (Wi), the cumulative oil produced (Qo) and the pressure drop across
the sandpack ( P) were measured as functions of time.
Table 8.2. Experimental Data for Unsteady State Relative Permeability
Measurements.
Wi
Qo
PV
%IOIP
psi
0.339
38.28
9.02
0.351
38.95
8.30
0.395
40.10
6.91
0.439
40.91
6.07
0.502
41.92
5.42
0.587
42.95
4.87
8-58
0.670
43.77
4.55
0.840
45.11
4.00
1.137
46.55
3.32
1.604
47.96
2.78
2.029
48.96
2.52
2.624
50.08
2.42
3.225
50.78
2.30
4.346
51.78
2.13
5.719
52.67
1.99
7.092
53.23
1.90
8.464
53.67
1.83
10.516
54.16
1.79
11.203
54.34
1.75
12.578
54.60
1.74
13.271
54.71
1.70
14.644
54.82
1.70
16.016
54.90
1.70
100 cc/hr
11.90%
54.7 cm
4.8 cm
30.58%
3.42 Darcies
Oil viscosity
108.37 cp
Oil density
0.959 gm/cm3
Water viscosity
1.01 cp
Water density
0.996 gm/cm3
26.7 dynes/cm
8-59
3.16
38.28 % IOIP
54.9 % IOIP
1.
2.
Perform the curve fits suggested in Eqs.(8.134) and (8.135) and display
the results graphically.
3.
4.
5.
Plot the graph of the true fractional flow curve measured in the
experiment.
6.
2.
Figures 8.24 and 8.25 show the curve fits of N pD versus ln Wi and
ln
1
Wi I r
N pD
versus ln
1
. The curve fit equations are
Wi
0.4026 0.0474 ln Wi
1
ln
Wi I r
0.0066 ln Wi
1
2.3600 1.5798ln
Wi
1
0.1130 ln
Wi
8-60
f nw 2
f nw 2
krnw
dN pD
2 0.0066 ln Wi
Wi
0.0474
dWi
d
1
Wi I r
1
d
Wi
1.5798
1
Wi
2 0.1130 ln
1
Wi
1
Wi
2.3600 1.5798ln
1
Wi
0.1130 ln
1
Wi
NpD
PV
PV
P
psi
ln(Wi)
ln
fnw2
Sw2
Ir
1
Wi I r
Wi
ln
f nw 2
Wi I r
k rnw
0.119
krnw
krw
0.924
0.000
0.339
0.337
9.02
-1.082
1.082
0.182
0.395
4.335
0.680
-0.385
0.368
0.494
0.021
0.351
0.343
8.30
-1.047
1.047
0.174
0.401
4.711
0.605
-0.503
0.356
0.490
0.022
0.395
0.353
6.91
-0.929
0.929
0.151
0.413
5.659
0.447
-0.804
0.319
0.473
0.025
0.439
0.360
6.07
-0.823
0.823
0.133
0.421
6.442
0.354
-1.040
0.290
0.457
0.028
0.502
0.369
5.42
-0.689
0.689
0.113
0.432
7.214
0.276
-1.287
0.258
0.436
0.032
0.587
0.378
4.87
-0.533
0.533
0.093
0.443
8.029
0.212
-1.550
0.226
0.411
0.037
0.67
0.386
4.55
-0.400
0.400
0.079
0.452
8.594
0.174
-1.751
0.203
0.388
0.042
0.84
0.397
4.00
-0.174
0.174
0.059
0.467
9.775
0.122
-2.106
0.170
0.349
0.052
1.137
0.410
3.32
0.128
-0.128
0.040
0.483
11.778
0.075
-2.595
0.136
0.295
0.066
1.604
0.423
2.78
0.473
-0.473
0.026
0.500
14.065
0.044
-3.116
0.108
0.237
0.084
2.029
0.431
2.52
0.708
-0.708
0.019
0.512
15.517
0.032
-3.449
0.094
0.199
0.097
2.624
0.441
2.42
0.965
-0.965
0.013
0.526
16.158
0.024
-3.747
0.082
0.162
0.113
3.225
0.447
2.30
1.171
-1.171
0.010
0.534
17.001
0.018
-4.004
0.074
0.135
0.125
4.346
0.456
2.13
1.469
-1.469
0.006
0.547
18.358
0.013
-4.379
0.064
0.100
0.144
5.719
0.464
1.99
1.744
-1.744
0.004
0.559
19.649
0.009
-4.722
0.057
0.074
0.162
7.092
0.469
1.90
1.959
-1.959
0.003
0.566
20.580
0.007
-4.983
0.053
0.057
0.175
8.464
0.473
1.83
2.136
-2.136
0.002
0.573
21.367
0.006
-5.198
0.050
0.045
0.185
10.516
0.477
1.79
2.353
-2.353
0.002
0.580
21.844
0.004
-5.437
0.047
0.033
0.197
11.203
0.479
1.75
2.416
-2.416
0.001
0.582
22.344
0.004
-5.523
0.047
0.030
0.200
12.578
0.481
1.74
2.532
-2.532
0.001
0.586
22.472
0.004
-5.644
0.045
0.025
0.206
8-61
13.271
0.482
1.70
2.586
-2.586
0.001
0.588
23.001
0.003
-5.721
0.045
0.022
0.208
14.644
0.483
1.70
2.684
-2.684
0.001
0.590
23.001
0.003
-5.820
0.044
0.019
0.213
16.016
0.484
1.70
2.774
-2.774
0.001
0.592
23.001
0.003
-5.909
0.043
0.016
0.217
Figure 8.23. Raw experimental data for the unsteady state relative
permeability measurements of Example 8.2.
8-62
3.
1
1
versus ln
Wi I r
Wi
4.
Figure 8.26 shows the oil-water relative permeability curves from the
unsteady state experiment. It should be noted that the relative
permeability curves are obtained over the limited saturation range of
0.395 S w
and S wf
S wirr
0.119
8-63
0.924 . The
experiment
predicts
residual
oil
saturation
of
40%
in
this
5.
6.
8-64
Figure 8.27. True fractional flow curve measured in the unsteady state
experiment of Example 8.2.
permeability curve is generally lower than the drainage curve at the same
saturations.
slightly greater than the drainage curve. These differences can easily be
explained. During drainage, the non-wetting phase flows through the large
pores displacing the wetting phase along the way. The thin film of wetting
phase that coats the grain surface acts as a lubricant for the flow of the nonwetting phase. Therefore, the relative permeability to the non-wetting phase
will be high during drainage. That of the wetting phase also will be high
because it starts from 1 and decreases as the non-wetting phase begins to
occupy some of the pores that were previously occupied by the wetting phase.
During imbibition, some of the non-wetting phase will be trapped in the large
pores. This capillary trapping reduces the amount of non-wetting phase
available to flow during imbibition compared to during drainage. It also
reduces the cross-sectional area of the medium occupied by the connected
non-wetting phase. As a result, the imbibition relative permeability to the
non-wetting phase is reduced compared to that during drainage. Because of
capillary trapping of the non-wetting phase during imbibition, the wetting
phase is forced to occupy and flow through pore sizes that are larger than it
would otherwise have flowed if there was no trapping of the non-wetting
phase. This forcing of the wetting phase to flow through larger pores than it
would otherwise have done in the absence of trapping enhances the relative
permeability of the wetting phase on the imbibition cycle compared to the
drainage cycle. These observations are in accord with the experimental results
shown in Figure 8.28.
8-66
8.5.3 Wettability
Relative permeability curves are markedly affected by the wettability of
the medium. Jennings (1957) measured steady state oil water relative
permeability curves on a core that was initially strongly water wet. He then
treated the core with a surface active agent (organo chlorosilane) that
rendered
the
core
oil
wet
and
repeated
the
relative
permeability
measurements. The results are shown Figure 8.29. In general, the relative
permeability to oil decreases while the relative permeability to water increases
as the medium changes from a strongly water wet to a strongly oil wet
8-67
These
8-68
contact angles of 0 and 180 generally obey Craigs rules of thumb regarding
the end-point water relative permeability and the water saturation at which
the water and oil relative permeabilities are equal. The rules of thumb do not
strictly apply to the intervening degrees of wettability.
8.5.4 Injection Rate
Injection rate usually does not affect relative permeabilities obtained by
the steady state method provided the rate is sufficiently high to minimize
capillary end effect. However, Peters and Khataniar (1987) have shown that
relative permeabilities obtained by the unsteady state displacement method
can show rate sensitivity due to viscous instability. Figures 8.32 and 8.33
show the effects of rate and viscosity ratio on relative permeability curves for
oil wet and water wet sandpacks. Both the curves for the oil wet medium and
the water wet medium shift to lower water saturations as the injection rate
(stability number) is increased.
increased. The water curve increases and the oil curve decreases away from
the steady state curves as the degree of instability of the displacement
experiment increases.
8-71
8-72
However, Peters and Khataniar (1987) have shown that relative permeabilities
obtained by the unsteady state displacement method at adverse viscosity
ratios can show sensitivity to injection rate and viscosity ratio due to viscous
instability (Figures 8.32 and 8.33).
8-73
relative
permeabilities
using
methane
and
normal
heptane
The results show that the relative permeabilities to gas and oil
8-74
relative permeabilities are high and a large saturation change may occur
during two phase flow.
specific surface areas and larger irreducible water saturations that leave less
room for multiphase flow. As a result, the end point relative permeabilities
are lower and the saturation range for two phase flow is smaller than in rocks
with large pores. Finally, rocks having some relatively large pores connected
by small pores have a large surface area, resulting in high irreducible water
saturation and relative permeability behavior that is similar to rocks with
small pores only. These observations are summarized in Figure 8.36.
8.5.8 Temperature
There are data in the literature that suggest that relative permeability
curves are affected by temperature. Poston et al., (1970) found that
temperature causes residual oil saturation to decrease and irreducible water
saturation to increase, with corresponding increases in relative permeability
curves (Figure 8.37). On the other hand, there are data in the literature that
also show that relative permeabilities are not temperature dependent (Miller
and Ramey, 1985). Apparently, the effect of temperature on relative
permeabilities is still and open question. This situation is understandable
because temperature can affect rock and fluid properties which in turn can
affect relative permeability curves. For example, high temperature can change
the wettability of the rock which affects relative permeabilities. It can also
reduce interfacial tensions, which can affect relative permeabilities and the
irreducible saturations. Because of the effect of temperature on the other
properties of the system that can affect relative permeabilities, it is difficult to
categorically determine the effect of temperature on relative permeabilities.
8-76
8-77
Figure 8.38
heterogeneity is to shift the oil and water relative permeabilities to low water
saturations thereby increasing the water relative permeability curve and
decreasing
the
oil
relative
permeability
curve.
Thus,
the
relative
saturation diagram, the approximate regions of single phase flow, two phase
flow and three phase flow in an oil, water and gas system ( Leverett and Lewis,
1941). It can be seen that the three phase flow region is small compared to
single phase and two phase flow regions. Figures 8.40, 8.41 and 8.42 show
the three phase water, oil and gas relative permeabilities measured by
Leverett and Lewis (1941). They found that the relative permeability to water
was only a function of the water saturation. However, the relative
permeabilities to oil and gas were functions of all three fluid saturations.
Figure 8.39. Approximate limits of saturations giving 5 per cent or more of all
components in flow stream for the flow of nitrogen, kerosene and brine.
Arrows point to increasing fraction of respective components in stream
(Leverett and Lewis, 1941).
8-80
Figure 8.40. Three phase relative permeability to water (Leverett and Lewis,
1941).
Figure 8.41. Three phase relative permeability to oil (Leverett and Lewis,
1941).
8-81
Figure 8.42. Three phase relative permeability to gas (Leverett and Lewis,
1941).
have reviewed the various three phase relative permeability models and found
that some of them do not always agree with the available experimental three
phase relative permeability data.
8-82
Sw
kw
k
krw ( S w )
0
1
dS w
Pc 2
(7.159)
dS w
Pc 2
and
1
knw
k
krnw ( S w )
dS w
Pc 2
Sw
1
(7.160)
dS w
Pc 2
We found that these models were defective in two respects: (1) they do not
include trapped residual saturations and (2) the sum of the relative
permeabilities is equal to 1, which is contrary to experimental observations.
These deficiencies result from the fact that the models neglect certain facts
about the nature of two phase flow in porous media. First, the cross-sectional
area open to the flow of the wetting phase is not a constant as assumed in the
models but is a function of the wetting phase saturation. Second, the
tortuosity for the flow of the wetting phase, which was neglected in the
models, is also a function of the wetting phase saturation. Burdine (1953)
proposed the following normalized drainage relative permeability models,
which account for these saturation dependencies in the cross-sectional area
and the tortuosity for two phase flow:
S w*
krw ( S w* )
*
w
kw ( S )
k w ( S w* 1)
S w*
0
1
1
dS w*
2
Pc
1
dS w*
Pc2
1
krnw ( S w* )
knw ( S w* )
knw ( S w* 0)
1 S w*
2 S*
w
1
8-83
1
dS w*
2
Pc
1
dS w*
2
Pc
(8.136)
(8.137)
S w*
S w S wirr
1 S wirr
(8.138)
In Eqs.(8.136) and (8.137), the ratios of the integrals on the right side
account for the cross-sectional area changes with saturations and the terms
S w*
and
1 S w*
should be noted that the base permeability used in Eq.(8.136) to define the
normalized relative permeability to the wetting phase is equal to the absolute
permeability of the medium, whereas the base permeability used to define the
normalized relative permeability to the non-wetting phase in Eq.(8.137) is
equal to the effective permeability to the non-wetting phase at the irreducible
wetting phase saturation. Thus, the normalized wetting phase relative
permeability given by Eq.(8.136) is also the true relative permeability to the
wetting
phase.
However,
the
normalized
non-wetting
phase
relative
pressure curve and then integrate the resulting linear function. As discussed
in Section 7.13.1, the Brooks-Corey drainage capillary pressure model is given
by
ln S w*
ln Pe
(7.161)
ln S w* ln Pe
(7.162)
ln Pc
or
ln Pc
and
Pc
where
Pe S w*
(7.164)
is the pore size distribution index obtained from the straight line
S w*
krw ( S w )
(8.139)
and
krnw ( S w )
1 S w*
S w*
(8.140)
A critical saturation can be introduced into the relative permeability model for
the non-wetting phase as
krnw ( S w )
S S wirr
1 w
Sm S wirr
8-85
S w*
(8.141)
where Sm is the wetting phase saturation corresponding to the critical nonwetting phase saturation. Finally, the true relative permeability curve for the
wetting and non-wetting phases are given by
2 3
krw ( S w )
krnw ( S w )
knwr
S w*
S S wi
1 w
Sm S wi
(8.142)
2
S w*
(8.143)
Capillary Pressure
(psi)
1.000
1.973
0.950
2.377
0.900
2.840
0.850
3.377
0.800
4.008
0.750
4.757
0.700
5.663
0.650
6.781
0.600
8.195
0.550
10.039
0.500
12.547
0.450
16.154
0.400
21.787
0.350
31.817
8-86
0.300
54.691
0.278
78.408
Figure 8.43 shows the graph of lnPc versus lnS w for Swirr = 0.10. The
equation of the resulting straight line is given by
ln Pc
2.1443ln S w*
ln 2.2238
Therefore,
2.1443
0.4664
Pe
2.2238
*
Figure 8.44 shows the graph of lnS w versus lnPc for Swi = 0.10. It also is
linear and could have been used for the subsequent calculations. The BrooksCorey drainage capillary pressure equation is given by
Pc
Pe S
*
w
2.2238 S w*
2.1443
8-87
8-88
Figure 8.46. True drainage relative permeability curves for Example 8.3.
8-89
Model
Pc
Pc
psi
krw S w
krnw S w
1.000
2.224
1.000
0.000
1.000 0.000
2.377
0.944
2.514
0.659
0.001
0.659 0.000
0.900
2.840
0.889
2.863
0.424
0.006
0.424 0.002
0.850
3.377
0.833
3.288
0.265
0.017
0.265 0.008
0.800
4.008
0.778
3.812
0.160
0.036
0.160 0.022
0.750
4.757
0.722
4.468
0.093
0.063
0.093 0.044
0.700
5.663
0.667
5.305
0.052
0.098
0.052 0.073
0.650
6.781
0.611
6.393
0.028
0.140
0.028 0.111
0.600
8.195
0.556
7.843
0.014
0.189
0.014 0.156
0.550
10.039
0.500
9.831
0.006
0.244
0.006 0.208
0.500
12.547
0.444
12.656
0.003
0.304
0.003 0.266
0.450
16.154
0.389
16.851
0.001
0.371
0.001 0.331
0.400
21.787
0.333
23.452
0.000
0.443
0.000 0.401
0.350
31.817
0.278
34.672
0.000
0.521
0.000 0.479
0.300
54.691
0.222
55.947
0.000
0.605
0.000 0.562
0.278
78.408
0.198
71.829
0.000
0.643
0.000 0.601
0.250
0.167
103.678
0.000
0.694
0.000 0.652
0.200
0.111
247.331
0.000
0.790
0.000 0.749
0.150
0.056
1093.394
0.000
0.892
0.000 0.852
0.100
0.000
0.000
1.000
0.000 0.962
Sw
psi
1.000
1.973
0.950
*
w
8-90
krw
krnw
NOMENCLATURE
A
Bo =
Bw =
fw
fw
fnw =
fnw2 =
fo
Fw =
gravitational acceleration
Ir
relative injectivity
Leverett J-function
ko =
kw =
kwr =
kg =
kro =
krw =
krg =
krw =
length
M =
mobility ratio
ME =
Ncap
Ng =
gravity number
NpD =
8-91
Nvcap
pressure
capillary number
Pc =
capillary pressure
Pe =
Pg =
Pnw=
Po =
Pc/ow =
Pc/go =
Pc/gw =
Pw =
Pw =
qo =
qg =
qnw=
qw =
qw =
Qi =
cumulative injection
Qnw =
Qo =
Se =
Sg =
gas saturation
So =
oil saturation
Sor =
Sw =
water saturation
Sw =
Swirr
8-92
Swro=
Sw2 =
Snw=
Snwr
Swav
Swav
Swf
frontal saturation
S w* =
time
tbt =
breakthrough time
tD
dimensionless time
vw =
vnw =
xf =
xD =
dimensionless distance
xDf =
Wi =
Wp =
WOR
x =
density of gas
density of oil
density of water
nw
interfacial tension
8-93
contact angle
viscosity
g =
=
gas viscosity
oil viscosity
w =
water viscosity
w =
nw=
porosity, fraction
tortuosity
P =
pressure drop
Pw =
Pnw
pore structure
8-94
From
Pore
Size
8-95
8-96
8-97
8-98
8-99
8-100
APPENDIX A
Summary
This appendix presents a systematic method for obtaining the
complete set of independent dimensionless groups pertinent to a
problem. The algebraic theory underlying the method is presented. It is
shown that the dimensionless groups occupy the null space of the
dimensional matrix. The eigenvectors of this null space, which constitute
the bases vectors for the null space, contain a complete set of
independent dimensionless
dimensionless
A-1
M ai Lbi T ci
(A.1)
a1 x1 a2 x2 ... an xn
b1 x1 b2 x2 ... bn xn
c1 x1 c2 x2 ... cn xn
(A.2)
A-2
a1 x1 a2 x2 ... an xn
(A.3)
b1 x1 b2 x2 ... bn xn
(A.4)
c1 x1 c2 x2 ... cn xn
(A.5)
Eqs. (A.3) to (A.5) are derived from Eq.(A.2) by setting the dimensions of
mass (M), length (L) and time (T) to zero, respectively. Eqs.(A.3) to (A.5)
constitute a homogeneous system of linear algebraic equations for the n
unknowns x1 , x2 ,..., xn . The system of equations is homogeneous because
the right-hand side is zero. Dimensional analysis always gives rise to a
homogeneous system of linear algebraic equations similar to Eqs.(A.3) to
(A.5).
Eqs.(A.3) to (A.5) may be written in matrix notation as
a1
a2
a3
a4 ... an
b1
b2
b3
b4
c1
c2
c3
c4
... bn
... cn
x1
x2
x3
x4
...
xn
0
0
(A.6)
or
Ax
(A.7)
a1
a2
a3
a4 ... an
b1
c1
b2
c2
b3
c3
b4
c4
A-3
... bn
... cn
(A.8)
and x is the vector of the unknowns. In general, because there are more
unknowns than equations, the dimensional matrix is usually an
mxn matrix in which m
groups we seek.
n r
mxm
A-4
x1
1 0 0 a14
0 1 0 a24
0 0 1 a34
a15
a25
a35
... a1n
... a2 n
... a3n
x2
x3
x4
x5
0
0
(A.9)
...
xn
x1
(A.10)
x2
(A.11)
x3
(A.12)
x4
x4
(A.13)
x5
x5
(A.14)
xn
(A.15)
...
xn
A-5
a14
a24
a15
a25
a1n
a2 n
x3
a34
a35
a3n
x4
x5
...
1
0
x4
...
0
xn
0
1
x5 ...
...
0
0
0
(A.16)
xn
...
1
e1
These
n r
a14
a24
a34
1 , e2
0
...
0
a15
a25
a35
0 ,..., en
1
...
0
a1n
a2 n
a3n
0
0
...
1
(A.17)
analysis.
They
contain
groups (Buckinghams
complete
set
from
them
are
also
linearly
A-6
n r
of
independent.
groups
Because
the
eigenvectors are the bases vectors for the null space of the dimensional
matrix, their linear combinations can be used to access every part of the
vector space thereby allowing us to derive other
independent
groups. The
n r
complete and
groups. The
groups
groups.
1, x5
x6 ... xn
Eq.(A.16) becomes
x1
x2
a14
a24
x3
a34
x4
e1
x5
...
xn
...
group is given by
A-7
(A.18)
Next, we choose x5 1, x4
x6 ... xn
becomes
x1
x2
a15
a25
x3
a35
x4
e2
x5
...
xn
...
0
group is given by
x4
x5
... xn
0.
(A.19)
1,
a1n
x2
a2 n
x3
a3n
x4
x5
en
0
0
...
...
xn
n r
A-8
(A.20)
groups
1,
2,
...,
nr
Groups
they are not unique. By appropriate choice of the values for x4, x5, ..., xn,
other complete and independent dimensionless
2,
...,
nr.
must derive
groups is complete, we
groups are
designated as
1,
2,
...,
nr,
then
groups is
must contain en
nr
either alone or in
DL
f1
, D p , u , Do ,
A-9
,g
(A.21)
The
objective
is
dimensionless
to
derive
complete
and
independent
set
of
by dimensional analysis.
Procedure
Step 1.
The first step is to determine if the number of variables can be
reduced by combining some of them. For example, gravity segregation of
two fluids always involve the combination of variables ( o s)g or
we can replace the three variables
s,
g. So,
g.
Step 2.
Next, we form the power product of all the variables involved in the
problem to obtain
x1
s
D px2 u x3 Dox4
x5
o
x6
DLx7
a dimensionless constant
(A.22)
Step 3.
Third, we express each of the variables in Eq.(A.22) in terms of the
primary dimensional variables of mass (M), length (L) and time (T). The
dimensions of each variable in Eq.(A.22) are shown in Table 1.
Step 4.
Fourth, we substitute the dimensions of each variable from Table 1
into Eq.(A.22) and insist that the power product become dimensionless
(i.e., has dimensions of M0L0T0). This step gives rise to the following
A-10
system of linear homogeneous algebraic equations for the powers x1, x2,
x3, x4, x5, x6 and x7:
x1
x1
x2
x5
x3 2 x4
x1 x3
x4
x6
(A.23)
x5 2 x6
x5 2 x6
2 x7
x7
(A.24)
(A.25)
Symbol
Dimensions
Dp
M0L1T0
Interstitial velocity
M0L1T1
Diffusion coefficient
Do
M0L2T1
Solvent viscosity
M1L1T1
Oil viscosity
M1L1T1
Buoyancy group
Dispersion coefficient
g
DL
M1L2 T2
M0L2T1
Eq.(A.23) comes from insisting that the power product have a mass
dimension of M0. Similarly, Eq.(A.24) comes from L0 and Eq.(A.25) comes
from T0.
equation as follows:
A-11
x1
x2
1
1 1
1 0
1
1
2
1
x3
2
2
2
1
x4
x5
0
0
1
1
(A.26)
x6
xn
1 1
1 0
(A.27)
x2
x3
x4
x5
Dp
Do
x6
g
x7
DL
A-12
It should be noted that the first row of the dimensional matrix is the
power of M in each variable, the second row is the power of L and the
third row is the power of T. This is what the first column of Table 2 is
designed to show. It should also be noted that the variables and their
powers in Eq.(A.2) have been placed on top of the dimensional matrix to
remind us of the relationship between the variables and the entries in
the dimensional matrix.
Step 4 (revised).
Next, we solve Eq.(A.26) to obtain the powers of the variables that
will make the power product dimensionless. An initial reaction to solving
Eq.(A.26) is to propose the solution x1 = x2 = x3 = x4 = x5 = x6 = x7 = 0.
This is the trivial solution in which we are not interested. Our interest is
in the nontrivial solutions.
There is extensive theory in linear algebra about the solutions of a
system of homogeneous linear algebraic equations such as Eq.(A.26).
Although we cannot review all of this theory at this point, we will use
some of it to enable us to solve Eq.(A.26) to obtain a complete set of
independent dimensionless
unknowns)
than
equations
equations).
system
of
linear
theorem
groups in advance by
determinant 1 1
1 0
1
1 1xdeterminant
0
1
1
1
(A.28)
A-14
(28)
x2
x3
x4
x5
x6
Do
x7
DL
Add rows 1 and 3 of Table 3 and place the outcome in row 3. The result
is shown in Table 4.
Table 4
x1
x2
x3
x4
x5
Do
A-15
x6
g
x7
DL
Add rows 2 and 3 of Table 4 and place the outcome in row 2. The result
is shown in Table 5.
Table 5
x1
x2
x3
x4
x5
x6
Do
x7
DL
x2
x3
x4
x5
x6
Do
x7
DL
A-16
dimensional matrix A. With the right hand side of Eq.(A.26) brought into
the picture, we can now solve for the 7 unknowns as follows:
x1
x5
(A.29)
x6
x2
x4
2 x6
x7
(A.30)
x3
x4
x6
x7
(A.31)
x4
x4
(A.32)
x5
x5
(A.33)
x6
x6
(A.34)
x7
x7
(A.35)
Dp
x1
x2
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
x3
Do
x4
1 x4
0 x5
0 x6
0 x7
x5
x6
x7
g
DL
(A.36)
The variables associated with the solution have been placed in column 1
of Eq.(A.36) for orientation purposes. We can readily identify the (nr)
eigenvectors of the null space of A in Eq.(A.36) as
A-17
0
1
1
1 , e2
0
0
0
e1
1
0
0
0 , e3
1
0
0
1
2
1
0 , e4
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
(A.37)
independent dimensionless
Eq.(A.36).
Step 5.
Dp
x1
x2
0
1
x3
Do
x4
x5
x6
x7
g
DL
e1
(A.38)
0
s
D p 1u 1 D01
0
o
A-18
DL0
D0
uD p
(A.39)
The dimensionless
group. Therefore,
D0
could have been written down
uD p
Dp
x1
x2
1
0
x3
Do
x4
x5
x6
x7
g
DL
1
2
e2
(A.40)
group is
D p0 u 0 D00
1
o
DL0
(A.41)
x1
Dp
x2
x3
Do
x4
x5
g
DL
1
2
1
e3
0
0
x6
x7
group is
A-19
(A.42)
1
3
2
p
0
0
0
o
Du D
D p2
0
L
g D
(A.43)
x1
Dp
x2
x3
Do
x4
x5
g
DL
0
s
(A.44)
0
0
0
x7
group is
D p 1u 1 D00
e4
x6
0
o
1,
2,
DL
uD p
DL1
and
(A.45)
because any other dimensionless groups derived from the solutions will
be some combination of
because each of the
remaining
3
and
Further,
1,
2,
and
Similarly,
3
4.
4.
1,
1;
4.
2,
1,
and
2
4
and
1,
3.
and
1,
4.
and
Finally,
2,
4.
4
A physical argument to
appears only in
2;
g appears only in
A-20
1,
3;
and
it is impossible to
manipulate
2,
independence of
and
2,
to get
and
1.
4.
Problem
The dimensionless
groups
1,
2,
and
1,
2,
and
4.
f2
(A.46)
or
DL
uD p
f2
Do
,
uD p
D p2
(A.47)
the
as a function of
nature
of
the
1,
and
function
3.
f2
experimentally.
finally, vary
while keeping
2
1
while keeping
and
A-21
constant.
good
group at a time to
and
while keeping
3
constant and
o,
s,
Do,
, D p and of
4,
and
1
3.
is u.
The
3.
and
1
4
3.
groups. A change in u
or by the
set of dimensionless
current set of
1,
2,
and
4.
judicious choice of the values of x4, x5, x6 and x7 to obtain the solutions
to Eq.(A.26). We can choose these values in some fashion to access
different parts of the vector space spanned by e1 , e2 , e3 and e4 . This
vector space contains an infinite set of complete and independent (nr)
dimensionless
1,
2,
and
A-22
Dp
x1
x2
0
1
x3
Do
x4
x5
x6
x7
g
DL
0
s
D1p u1 D0 1
e1
(A.48)
group is
0
o
uD p
DL0
D0
(A.49)
x1
Dp
x2
x3
Do
x4
x5
g
DL
1
s
D p0 u 0 D00
e2
(A.50)
0
1
x6
x7
group is
1
o
DL0
(A.51)
A-23
x1
Dp
x2
x3
Do
x4
x5
g
DL
e1 e3
x6
x7
1
3
D 3p u 0 D0 1
(A.52)
group is
0
o
g DL0
D 3p
Do
(A.53)
3
1
x1
Dp
x2
x3
Do
x4
x5
g
DL
e1 e4
x6
x7
group is
0
s
D p0 u 0 D0 1
(A.54)
0
o
1,
2,
DL1
and
DL
Do
4
(A.55)
4
1
1,
2,
and
4.
The new set was obtained by a careful manipulation of the vector space
A-24
groups
2,
4.
1,
3,
we
and
These choices of
groups.
f3
(A.56)
or
DL
Do
f3
uD p
Do
D p3
Do
(A.57)
keeping
while keeping
while keeping
1
and
and
2
3
and
only. It is now
while
1,
and
on
4.
A-25
Also, the density of the injected solvent must be matched with that of the
displaced fluid. Therefore, the dimensionless group
D 3p
Do
is a
constant equal to zero. Its effect is eliminated from the experiment. With
these restrictions imposed on the experiments, Eq.(A.57) becomes
DL
Do
f4
uD p
(A.58)
Do
f5
uD p
(A.59)
Do
uD p
Do
experimental programs are shown in Figures 5.27 and 5.28, which are
reproduced here for convenience.
2.
A-27
4.
appeared only in
3;
2;
g whose power is x6
A-28
1;
4.
On the other hand, the variables whose powers are given by the r
variables solved for can appear in more than one dimensionless
group.
5.
The
initial
arrangement
of
the
variables
is
important
in
group only.
A-29
Concluding Remarks
A systematic procedure has been presented to derive the complete
and independent set of dimensionless
problem. The theoretical basis of the method has been presented and
discussed. It is shown that a complete set of independent dimensionless
groups is given by the eigenvectors of the null space of the dimensional
matrix. These eigenvectors contain a set of complete and independent
dimensionless
set of dimensionless
Nomenclature
DL
Dp
f1
f2
f3
f4
f5
Do
gravitational acceleration
A-30
solvent viscosity
solvent density
References
Birkoff, G.: Dimensional Analysis and Partial Differential Equations,
Elec. Eng., Vol. 67, p. 1185-1188, 1948.
Brand, L.: The pi-Theorem of Dimensional Analysis, Am. Math.
Monthly, Vol. 59, p. 516, 1952.
Bridgman, P.W.: Dimensional Analysis, Yale University Press, New
Haven, 1937.
Buckingham, E. : On Physically Similar Systems: Illustrations of the
use of Dimensional Equations, Phys. Rev., Vol. 4, pp. 345-376,
1914.
Catchpole, J.P. and Fulford, G.: Dimensionless Groups, Industrial and
Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 58, No. 3 (March 1966) 4660.
Chen, W.: Algebraic Theory of Dimensional Analysis, J. Franklin Inst.,
Vol. 292, No. 6, pp. 403-422, Dec. 1948.
Corrsin, S.: A Simple Geometrical Proof of Buckinghams p-Theorem,
Am. J. Phys., Vol. 19, pp. 180-181, 1951.
Decius, J.C.: Dimensional Analysis: An Approach from Transformation
Theory and a Criterion for Scaling Model Experiments, J. Franklin
Inst., Vol. 245, pp. 379-387, 1948.
Drobot, S.: On the Foundations of Dimensional Analysis, Studia Math.,
Vol. 14, pp. 84-99, 1953.
Happ, W.W.: Computer-oriented Procedures for Dimensional Analysis,
J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 38, pp. 3918-3926, 1967.
Hellums, J.D. and Churchill, S.W.: Dimensional Analysis and Natural
Circulation, Chemical Engineering Symposium Series, pp. 75-80.
Huntley, H.E.: Dimensional Analysis, New York, Dover, 1967.
Langhaar, H.L.: A Summary of Dimensional Analysis, J. Franklin Inst.,
Vol. 242, pp. 459-463, 1946.
Langhaar, H.L.: Dimensional Analysis and Theory of Models, John Wiley
and Sons Inc., New York, 1953.
A-31
A-32
A-33