0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
56 vizualizări8 pagini
The magnetic induction creates a negative electric field, causing an electromagnetic inertia responsible for the relativistic mass change; it is the mysterious Higgs Field giving mass to the particles. The Planck Distribution Law of the electromagnetic oscillators explains the electron/proton mass rate by the diffraction patterns. The accelerating charges explain not only the Maxwell Equations and the Special Relativity, but the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation, the wave particle duality and the electron’s spin also, building the bridge between the Classical and Relativistic Quantum Theories. The self maintained electric potential of the accelerating charges equivalent with the General Relativity space-time curvature, and since it is true on the quantum level also, gives the base of the Quantum Gravity. The diffraction patterns and the locality of the self-maintaining electromagnetic potential explains also the Quantum Entanglement, giving it as a natural part of the relativistic quantum theory.
The magnetic induction creates a negative electric field, causing an electromagnetic inertia responsible for the relativistic mass change; it is the mysterious Higgs Field giving mass to the particles. The Planck Distribution Law of the electromagnetic oscillators explains the electron/proton mass rate by the diffraction patterns. The accelerating charges explain not only the Maxwell Equations and the Special Relativity, but the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation, the wave particle duality and the electron’s spin also, building the bridge between the Classical and Relativistic Quantum Theories. The self maintained electric potential of the accelerating charges equivalent with the General Relativity space-time curvature, and since it is true on the quantum level also, gives the base of the Quantum Gravity. The diffraction patterns and the locality of the self-maintaining electromagnetic potential explains also the Quantum Entanglement, giving it as a natural part of the relativistic quantum theory.
The magnetic induction creates a negative electric field, causing an electromagnetic inertia responsible for the relativistic mass change; it is the mysterious Higgs Field giving mass to the particles. The Planck Distribution Law of the electromagnetic oscillators explains the electron/proton mass rate by the diffraction patterns. The accelerating charges explain not only the Maxwell Equations and the Special Relativity, but the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation, the wave particle duality and the electron’s spin also, building the bridge between the Classical and Relativistic Quantum Theories. The self maintained electric potential of the accelerating charges equivalent with the General Relativity space-time curvature, and since it is true on the quantum level also, gives the base of the Quantum Gravity. The diffraction patterns and the locality of the self-maintaining electromagnetic potential explains also the Quantum Entanglement, giving it as a natural part of the relativistic quantum theory.
The magnetic induction creates a negative electric field, causing an
electromagnetic inertia responsible for the relativistic mass change; it is the mysterious Higgs Field giving mass to the particles. The Planck Distribution La of the electromagnetic oscillators e!plains the electron"proton mass rate by the diffraction patterns. The accelerating charges e!plain not only the #a!ell $%uations and the &pecial 'elativity, but the Heisenberg (ncertainty 'elation, the ave particle duality and the electron)s spin also, building the bridge beteen the *lassical and 'elativistic +uantum Theories. The self maintained electric potential of the accelerating charges e%uivalent ith the ,eneral 'elativity space-time curvature, and since it is true on the %uantum level also, gives the base of the +uantum ,ravity. The diffraction patterns and the locality of the self-maintaining electromagnetic potential e!plains also the +uantum $ntanglement, giving it as a natural part of the relativistic %uantum theory.
Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................... 2 Popular questions about the Higgs Field: ................................................................................ 2 How can we answer these questions? .................................................................................... 2 Quantum entanglement ........................................................................................................... 3 The Classical elati!istic effect .................................................................................................. 3 The elati!istic Quantum "echanics ......................................................................................... 3 The Heisenberg #ncertaint$ elation ......................................................................................... 3 The %eneral elati!it$ & 'lectromagnetic inertia and mass............................................................ ( 'lectromagnetic )nduction .................................................................................................... ( elati!istic change of mass .................................................................................................... ( The frequenc$ dependence of mass ....................................................................................... ( 'lectron * Proton mass rate .................................................................................................. ( Higgs Field .............................................................................................................................. ( The Higgs boson .................................................................................................................. + ,hat is the -pin? ................................................................................................................. + The ,ea. )nteraction ........................................................................................................... + Higgs mechanism ................................................................................................................. + %ra!it$ from the point of !iew of quantum ph$sics ..................................................................... / The %ra!itational force ......................................................................................................... / The %ra!iton ....................................................................................................................... 0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 0 eferences ............................................................................................................................. 0
1uthor: %eorge a2na Preface Popular questions about the Higgs Field:
345 )f the Higgs field is responsible for imbuing particles with mass6 and mass is responsible for gra!it$6 is it possible that the Higgs field will pro!ide the missing lin. between general relati!it$ and quantum mechanics i4e4 could the Higgs field be the basis of a quantum theor$ of gra!it$? 245 Can the theoretical Higgs Field be used as the 7cause8 of relati!istic momentum or relati!istic .inetic energ$ of a mo!ing bod$? 345 9oes 'instein:s %eneral elati!it$ need to be ad2usted for the Higgs field? (45 -ince the Higgs field gi!es most particles mass6 and permeates all space6 then % needs the Higgs field to be a theor$ of space? +45 -o where % is highl$ cur!ed6 the Higgs field is also cur!ed? 1nd does a highl$ cur!ed Higgs field affect the wa$ particles acquire mass? For that matter6 a cur!ed space&time would also cur!e electromagnetic field? How can we answer these questions? There is an e;planation of the magnetic effect caused b$ the electric current from the obser!ed effects of the accelerating electrons6 causing naturall$ the e;perienced changes of the electric field potential along the electric wire4 The charge distribution is lowering in the reference frame of the accelerating charges linearl$: ds<dt = at >time coordinate56 but in the reference frame of the current it is parabolic: s = a<2 t 2 >geometric coordinate54 The accelerating electrons e;plain not onl$ the "a;well 'quations and the -pecial elati!it$6 but the Heisenberg #ncertaint$ elation6 the wa!e particle dualit$ and the electron?s spin also6 building the bridge between the Classical and Quantum Theories4 @3A Bne origin of the Quantum Ph$sics is the Planc. 9istribution Caw of the electromagnetic oscillators6 gi!ing equal intensit$ for 2 different wa!elengths on an$ temperature4 1n$ of these two wa!elengths will gi!e equal intensit$ diffraction patterns6 building different as$mmetric constructions6 for e;ample proton & electron structures >atoms56 molecules6 etc4 -ince the particles are centers of diffraction patterns the$ also ha!e particle * wa!e dualit$ as the electromagnetic wa!es ha!e4 The 'lectrowea. )nteraction shows that the ,ea. )nteraction is basicall$ electromagnetic in nature4 The arrow of time shows the entrop$ grows b$ changing the temperature dependent diffraction patterns of the electromagnetic oscillators4 @2A Quantum entanglement "easurements of ph$sical properties such as position6 momentum6 spin6 polariDation6 etc4 performed on entangled particles are found to be appropriatel$ correlated4 For e;ample6 if a pair of particles is generated in such a wa$ that their total spin is .nown to be Dero6 and one particle is found to ha!e cloc.wise spin on a certain a;is6 then the spin of the other particle6 measured on the same a;is6 will be found to be countercloc.wise4 Eecause of the nature of quantum measurement6 howe!er6 this beha!ior gi!es rise to effects that can appear parado;ical: an$ measurement of a propert$ of a particle can be seen as acting on that particle >e4g4 b$ collapsing a number of superimposed states5F and in the case of entangled particles6 such action must be on the entangled s$stem as a whole4 )t thus appears that one particle of an entangled pair G.nowsG what measurement has been performed on the other6 and with what outcome6 e!en though there is no .nown means for such information to be communicated between the particles6 which at the time of measurement ma$ be separated b$ arbitraril$ large distances4 @/A
The Classical Relativistic effect The mo!ing charges are self maintain the electromagnetic field locall$6 causing their mo!ement and this is the result of their acceleration under the force of this field4 )n the classical ph$sics the charges will distributed along the electric current so that the electric potential lowering along the current6 b$ linearl$ increasing the wa$ the$ ta.e e!er$ ne;t time period because this accelerated motion4 @3A The Relativistic Quantum echanics The same thing happens on the atomic scale gi!ing a dp impulse difference and a d; wa$ difference between the different part of the not point li.e particles4 Commonl$ accepted idea that the relati!istic effect on the particle ph$sics it is the fermions: spin & another unresol!ed problem in the classical concepts4 )f the electric charges can mo!e onl$ with accelerated motions in the self maintaining electromagnetic field6 once upon a time the$ would reach the !elocit$ of the electromagnetic field4 The resolution of this problem is the spinning particle6 constantl$ accelerating and not reaching the !elocit$ of light because the acceleration is radial4 The Heisenberg !ncertaint" Relation ) thin. that we ha!e a simple bridge between the classical and quantum mechanics b$ understanding the Heisenberg #ncertaint$ elations4 )t ma.es clear that the particles are not point li.e but ha!e a d; and dp uncertaint$4 The #eneral Relativit" $ %lectromagnetic inertia and mass %lectromagnetic &nduction -ince the magnetic induction creates a negati!e electric field as a result of the changing acceleration6 it wor.s as an electromagnetic inertia6 causing an electromagnetic mass4 @3A Relativistic change of mass The increasing mass of the electric charges the result of the increasing inducti!e electric force acting against the accelerating force4 The decreasing mass of the decreasing acceleration is the result of the inducti!e electric force acting against the decreasing force4 This is the relati!istic mass change e;planation6 especiall$ importantl$ e;plaining the mass reduction in case of !elocit$ decrease4 The frequenc" dependence of mass -ince E = h and E = mc 2 6 m = h /c 2 that is the m depends onl$ on the frequenc$4 )t means that the mass of the proton and electron are electromagnetic and the result of the electromagnetic induction6 caused b$ the changing acceleration of the spinning and mo!ing chargeH )t could be that the m o inertial mass is the result of the spin6 since this is the onl$ accelerating motion of the electric charge4 -ince the accelerating motion has different frequenc$ for the electron in the atom and the proton6 the$ masses are different6 also as the wa!elengths on both sides of the diffraction pattern6 gi!ing equal intensit$ of radiation4 @2A %lectron ' Proton mass rate There is an as$mmetr$ between the mass of the electric charges6 for e;ample proton and electron6 can understood b$ the as$mmetrical Planc. 9istribution Caw4 This temperature dependent energ$ distribution is as$mmetric around the ma;imum intensit$6 where the annihilation of matter and antimatter is a high probabilit$ e!ent4 )n the ma;imum intensit$ no diffraction patterns with equal intensit$ that is no fermions onl$ bosons4 The as$mmetric sides are creating different frequencies of electromagnetic radiations being in the same intensit$ le!el and compensating each other4 Bne of these compensating ratios is the electron * proton mass ratio4 The lower energ$ side has no compensating intensit$ le!el6 it is the dar. energ$ and the corresponding matter is the dar. matter4 The Planc. distribution law e;plains the different frequencies of the proton and electron6 gi!ing equal intensit$ to different lambda wa!elengthsH 1lso since the particles are diffraction patterns the$ ha!e some closeness to each other * can be seen as a gra!itational force4 )n Quantum Field Theor$ >QFT56 particles are described b$ e;citations of a quantum field that satisfies the appropriate quantum mechanical field equations4 The e;citations of the quantum field mean diffraction patterns in m$ theor$4 @2A Higgs Field The Higgs mechanism is a result of something called a field that e;tends throughout space6 e!en where no particles are present4 This notion is probabl$ most familiar to $ou from a magnetic field4 Iou feel a force between a magnet and $our refrigerator e!en when 7nothing8 is there4 1 field can fill 7empt$8 space4 The Higgs field e;tends throughout space4 'lementar$ particles acquire their masses b$ interacting with this field4 )t is .ind of li.e space is charged and particles get mass through their interactions with this charge4 The Higgs boson is not directl$ responsible for mass4 The Higgs field is4 The boson is a particle that tells us our understanding of this mechanism is correct4 )t also is a big clue as to where that field came from in the first place4 )ts disco!er$ tells us that what we e;pected to be true was indeed correct6 and it gi!es us clues as to what else might underlie the -tandard "odel4 [4] The Higgs boson E$ "arch 2J336 the particle had been pro!en to beha!e6 interact and deca$ in man$ of the e;pected wa$s predicted b$ the -tandard "odel6 and was also tentati!el$ confirmed to ha!e K parit$ and Dero spin6 two fundamental criteria of a Higgs boson6 ma.ing it also the first .nown scalar particle to be disco!ered in nature6 although a number of other properties were not full$ pro!en and some partial results do not $et precisel$ match those e;pectedF in some cases data is also still awaited or being anal$Ded4 )n m$ opinion6 the best e;planation of the Higgs mechanism for a la$ audience is the one in!ented b$ 9a!id "iller4 Iou can find it here: http:<<www4strings4ph4qmul4ac4u.<L2mc<epp<higgs34html 4 The field must come first4 The boson is an e;citation of the field4 -o no field6 no e;citation4 Bn the other hand in quantum field theor$ it is difficult to separate the field and the e;citations4 The Higgs field is what gi!es particles their mass4 There is a !ideo that gi!es an idea as to the Higgs field and the boson4 )t is here: http:<<www4$outube4com<watch?!=)g3Mh0uP$w 4 Note that this analog$ isn:t as good as the "iller one6 but as is usuall$ the case6 if $ou loo. at all the analogies $ou:ll get the best understanding of the situation4 (hat is the )pin? -o we .now alread$ that the new particle has spin Dero or spin two and we could tell which one if we could detect the polariDations of the photons produced4 #nfortunatel$ this is difficult and neither 1TC1- nor C"- are able to measure polariDations4 The onl$ direct and sure wa$ to confirm that the particle is indeed a scalar is to plot the angular distribution of the photons in the rest frame of the centre of mass4 1 spin Dero particles li.e the Higgs carries no directional information awa$ from the original collision so the distribution will be e!en in all directions4 This test will be possible when a much larger number of e!ents ha!e been obser!ed4 )n the mean time we can settle for less certain indirect indicators4 The (ea* &nteraction
-ince the Higgs boson is necessar$ to the , and O bosons6 the dipole change of the ,ea. interaction and the change in the magnetic effect caused gra!itation must be conducted4 The ,ien law is also important to e;plain the ,ea. interaction6 since it describes the T ma; change and the diffraction patterns change4 @2A Higgs mechanism The magnetic induction creates a negati!e electric field6 causing an electromagnetic inertia4 Probabl$ it is the m$sterious Higgs field gi!ing mass to the charged particles? ,e can thin. about the photon as an electron&positron pair6 the$ ha!e mass4 The neutral particles are built from negati!e and positi!e charges6 for e;ample the neutron6 deca$ing to proton and electron4 The wa!e * particle dualit$ ma.es sure that the particles are oscillating and creating magnetic induction as an inertial mass6 e;plaining also the relati!istic mass change4 Higher frequenc$ creates stronger magnetic induction6 smaller frequenc$ results lesser magnetic induction4 )t seems to me that the magnetic induction is the secret of the Higgs field4 )n particle ph$sics6 the Higgs mechanism is a .ind of mass generation mechanism6 a process that gi!es mass to elementar$ particles4 1ccording to this theor$6 particles gain mass b$ interacting with the Higgs field that permeates all space4 "ore precisel$6 the Higgs mechanism endows gauge bosons in a gauge theor$ with mass through absorption of Nambu*%oldstone bosons arising in spontaneous s$mmetr$ brea.ing4 The simplest implementation of the mechanism adds an e;tra Higgs field to the gauge theor$4 The spontaneous s$mmetr$ brea.ing of the underl$ing local s$mmetr$ triggers con!ersion of components of this Higgs field to %oldstone bosons which interact with >at least some of5 the other fields in the theor$6 so as to produce mass terms for >at least some of5 the gauge bosons4 This mechanism ma$ also lea!e behind elementar$ scalar >spin&J5 particles6 .nown as Higgs bosons4 )n the -tandard "odel6 the phrase GHiggs mechanismG refers specificall$ to the generation of masses for the , P 6 and O wea. gauge bosons through electrowea. s$mmetr$ brea.ing4 The Carge Hadron Collider at C'N announced results consistent with the Higgs particle on Qul$ (6 2J32 but stressed that further testing is needed to confirm the -tandard "odel4 #ravit" from the point of view of quantum ph"sics The #ravitational force The gra!itational attracti!e force is basicall$ a magnetic force4 The same electric charges can attract one another b$ the magnetic force if the$ are mo!ing parallel in the same direction4 -ince the electricall$ neutral matter is composed of negati!e and positi!e charges the$ need 2 photons to mediate this attracti!e force6 one per charges4 The Eing Eang caused parallel mo!ing of the matter gi!es this magnetic force6 e;perienced as gra!itational force4 -ince gra!iton is a tensor field6 it has spin = 26 could be 2 photons with spin = 3 together4 Iou can thin. about photons as !irtual electron * positron pairs6 obtaining the necessar$ !irtual mass for gra!it$4 The mass as seen before a result of the diffraction6 for e;ample the proton * electron mass rate "p=3R(J "e4 )n order to mo!e one of these diffraction ma;imum >electron or proton5 we need to inter!ene into the diffraction pattern with a force appropriate to the intensit$ of this diffraction ma;imum6 means its intensit$ or mass4
The Eig Eang caused acceleration created radial currents of the matter6 and since the matter is composed of negati!e and positi!e charges6 these currents are creating magnetic field and attracting forces between the parallel mo!ing electric currents4 This is the gra!itational force e;perienced b$ the matter6 and also the mass is result of the electromagnetic forces between the charged particles4 The positi!e and negati!e charged currents attracts each other or b$ the magnetic forces or b$ the much stronger electrostatic forcesH?
The gra!itational force attracting the matter6 causing concentration of the matter in a small space and lea!ing much space with low matter concentration: dar. matter and energ$4 There is an as$mmetr$ between the mass of the electric charges6 for e;ample proton and electron6 can understood b$ the as$mmetrical Planc. 9istribution Caw4 This temperature dependent energ$ distribution is as$mmetric around the ma;imum intensit$6 where the annihilation of matter and antimatter is a high probabilit$ e!ent4 The as$mmetric sides are creating different frequencies of electromagnetic radiations being in the same intensit$ le!el and compensating each other4 Bne of these compensating ratios is the electron * proton mass ratio4 The lower energ$ side has no compensating intensit$ le!el6 it is the dar. energ$ and the corresponding matter is the dar. matter4
The #raviton )n ph$sics6 the gra!iton is a h$pothetical elementar$ particle that mediates the force of gra!itation in the framewor. of quantum field theor$4 )f it e;ists6 the gra!iton is e;pected to be massless >because the gra!itational force appears to ha!e unlimited range5 and must be a spin&2 boson4 The spin follows from the fact that the source of gra!itation is the stress&energ$ tensor6 a second&ran. tensor >compared to electromagnetism:s spin&3 photon6 the source of which is the four¤t6 a first&ran. tensor54 1dditionall$6 it can be shown that an$ massless spin&2 field would gi!e rise to a force indistinguishable from gra!itation6 because a massless spin&2 field must couple to >interact with5 the stress&energ$ tensor in the same wa$ that the gra!itational field does4 This result suggests that6 if a massless spin&2 particle is disco!ered6 it must be the gra!iton6 so that the onl$ e;perimental !erification needed for the gra!iton ma$ simpl$ be the disco!er$ of a massless spin&2 particle4 @3A Conclusions The electric currents causing self maintaining electric potential is the source of the special and general relati!istic effects4 The Higgs Field is the result of the electromagnetic induction4 The %ra!iton is two photons together4 The accelerated charges self&maintaining potential shows the localit$ of the relati!it$6 wor.ing on the quantum le!el also4 @3A The -ecret of Quantum 'ntanglement that the particles are diffraction patterns of the electromagnetic wa!es and this wa$ their quantum states e!er$ time is the result of the quantum state of the intermediate electromagnetic wa!es4 @2A
References @3A The "agnetic field of the 'lectric current and the "agnetic induction 1uthor: %eorge a2na Publication date: 3+<JS<2J33 ,ebsite: 1cademia4edu http:<<academia4edu<3R3333+<TheT"agneticTfieldTofTtheT'lectricTcurrent Cast accessed: 2R<J2<2J3( @2A 3 9imensional -tring Theor$ 1uthor: %eorge a2na Publication date: 33<J/<2J33 ,ebsite: 1cademia4edu http:<<academia4edu<3R3((+(<3T9imensionalT-tringTTheor$ Cast accessed: 2R<J2<2J3( @3A %ra!iton Production E$ Two Photon and 'lectron&Photon Processes )n UaluDa&Ulein Theories ,ith Carge ';tra 9imensions 1uthors: 9a!id 1twood6 -haoul$ Ear&-halom6 1mar2it -oni Journal reference: Phys.Rev. D61 (2000) 116011 Publication date: 23<JS<3SSS ,ebsite: 1r;i!4org http:<<ar;i!4org<abs<hep&ph<SSJS3S2 Cast accessed: 2R<J2<2J3( @(A ';plaining the Higgs * )nter!iew with Cisa andall6 Professor of -cience in Har!ard?s 9epartment of Ph$sics E$ -arah -weene$6 Har!ard -taff ,riter Publication date: 33<J3<2J3( ,ebsite: Har!ard %aDette http:<<news4har!ard4edu<gaDette<stor$<2J3(<J3<e;plaining&the&higgs< Cast accessed: 2R<J2<2J3( @+A Quantum 'ntanglement http:<<en4wi.ipedia4org<wi.i<QuantumTentanglement @/A -pace&based e;periment could test gra!it$:s effects on quantum entanglement http:<<ph$s4org<news<2J3(&J+&space&based&gra!it$&effects&quantum&entanglement4html