+ Font Size -

XFINITY Connect
KimBeem@comcast.net
Case Number#10-011421 - Complaint (document labeled 012311 Complaint)
From : KimBeem@comcast.net
Subject : Case Number#10-011421 - Complaint (document labeled 012311 Complaint)
To : John Geidenberger <JGeidenberger@lcounty.com>
Cc : Kenneth Oswalt <koswalt@lcounty.com>, James Miller <JamesMiller@lcounty.com>, rthorp <rthorp@lcounty.com>, Chad
Dennis <cdennis@lcounty.com>, Mark Weiner <mweiner@lcounty.com>, KimBeem <KimBeem@comcast.net>
Sat, Jan 22, 2011 07:07 PM
10 attachments
Lt. Geidenberger:
Attached please find the complaint against Sgt Tyo and Deputy Murphy and I am also requesting disciplinary action against Lt. Evans for failure to supervise. Please note
this is a forwarded message with the emails and attachments that were sent to Tyo and Murphy in October. I never dreamed that there still would be no progress in
January. It is my sincerest hope that we can finally bring some resolution to this matter.
In addition to the electronic copy of the complaint, I will sign it and mail a hard copy to your attention. I have no fear of signing it as I know the truth is on my side.
Additional exhibit will follow under separate cover. Upon receipt of all documents, I would like an estimate on a time frame for review. It is my contention that I have
been through a tremendous amount of stress, anguish, and cost to clear my name at the hands of the LCSO so anything that can be done to expedite would be most
appreciated, especially since most of the information has been sent to the sheriff's office previously.
Regards,
Kim Beem
718 Woodewind Drive
Naperville, IL 60563
KimBeem@comcast.net
cell 740-975-7835
work 312-822-2742
home 630-857-3264
-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Beem [mailto:KimBeem@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 6:16 AM
To: 'TTyo1@lcounty.com'
Cc: 'amurphy@lcounty.com'; 'mweiner@lcounty.com'
Subject: FW: Case Number#10-011421
Deputy Tyo,
First, please allow me to apologize if your position is higher than Deputy. I am working with limited information. I don't know if you were the gentleman present who I
spoke to in my father's drive way in June. I am hoping that you are as on that date, I spoke directly with that gentlemen while the other officers were present. The only
interaction I had with Deputy Murphy was giving her my contact information. In my presence, the only time the issue of the club was raised was when I raised it and Kay
indicated that she had to have protection due to our size difference.....a child like response as there was no reason for her to have been sitting in her car in a hay field
with a club other than the obvious one of creating an incident.
I realize the Sheriff's office is very busy with overwhelming case loads but I would like to at least get an acknowledgement of receipt of my request for correction.
Additionally, if at all possible and since I don't know what to expect, I would like to get an estimated time frame of when my request will be reviewed. Although it was
uncomfortable having them swing a club at me, I did not show fear because they could only injure me and would be held accountable for that - I remain fearful of what
Kay may do with her gun. To my knowledge, she did not have the gun with her that day in the field so I will not claim I was the victim - I can assure you she was an
instigator not a victim. But I do feel entirely victimized with her false report. I had no idea something so erroneous and damaging existed. She is going after my good
name and I simply can't have her lies impact me in that way. She knows at some point she and Beth will be challenged as being unsuitable as trustees (for the trust
established 10 months before my mother's death which negated the equal distribution will that had been in place for over 30 years) so she created an incident to make
me look bad. Even with all the manipulating they did with my ailing mother who I was closest to (a fact that can be confirmed with her 3 closest and lifelong friends, Joan
Durnell, Linda Harmon, and Rosemary Johnson), they were unable to keep her from naming me in the trustee succession nor were they able to get her to change her life
insurance beneficiary - when she died, my father was 1st beneficiary with me named 2nd - they were not named. I have copied Deputy Murphy in case she is able to
review this first and also the county Victim Advocate.
Thank you in advance for your assistance,
Kim Beem
-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Beem [mailto:KimBeem@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 6:50 PM
To: 'amurphy@lcounty.com'
Subject: Case Number#10-011421
Deputy Murphy,
At the time of this incident, since my sister, Kay, had admitted to the police officers present that she had a club, no questions were ask of me regarding a club, and when
I shared with that I had not pressed charges when I advised the Naperville police of Kay's harassment because of the problems it would cause and an officer said if this
continued, I will need to press charges, I thought we were all on the same page that Kay and Beth had created the incident. Recently, I thought it might be prudent to
have a copy of the report. After several attempts through the website and additional requests, I was able to secure and was rather shocked as it does not at all reflect
the occurrence. I am writing you today to respectfully request that it either be corrected or my account be filed with it so it does not stand alone since it is not remotely
accurate. I know law enforcement officers are put in difficult situations in these matters. Having underwritten law enforcement liability during a large part of my nearly
30 years in the insurance industry, I also know when someone like my sister creates an incident as she did, how officers are put in harm's way for no reason responding
Page 1 of 6 XFINITY Connect
3/17/2012 http://sz0048.ev.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=273683&tz=America/Chicag...
to a fraudulent call. She is not a victim but a manipulator. The only victims in this case were the law enforcement officers who had to respond and to some degree me as
I have to waste time responding to Kay's lies.
Attached please find my response. Additionally, I am including some supporting documents. Should you need to talk with me further, I can be reached at home at 630
857-3264, work at 312-822-2742 or by cell at 740-975-7835.
Thank you in advance for your consideration!
Regards,
Kim Beem
From : City of Naperville Citizen Support Center Support <napervilleil@mycusthelp.com>
Subject : City of Naperville Citizen Support Center - Response to Question #W004939-040610 :: W004939-040610
To : KimBeem@comcast.net
Wed, Apr 07, 2010 04:20 AM
Your Question:
I received a harassing phone call from my sister in Ohio over a family issue. I will be contacting Comcast (my land line carrier) and Sprint (my cell carrier) to have
her phone numbers blocked. How do I go about making a non-emergency police report to have a record of the incident? Her information is Alyson Beem 2300
Watkins Road S.W. Pataskala, Ohio 43062. The cell number she called from is 614-668-6321. Although she owns a gun, I am not concerned about her coming
here because of the distance but she is currently unemployed so has time on her hands. Thank you for your assistance.
Our Response:
Hello Ms. Beem,
My name is Mike Anders, and I am a Commander with the Naperville Police Department. Your safety is our top priority. I would like you to call our front desk
officer at 630-420-6665, as soon as possible so an investigation can be initiated. If you would prefer an officer visiting your residence, we can accommodate that
request at anytime with a 911 call to our dispatch center.
In any case, please contact as soon as possible so that an investigation can be initiated.
Please respond to my message so that I am assured your received my information.
Commander Mike Anders
You can monitor your question online by clicking the link below. If the link is not clickable, please copy and paste the URL into your web browser.
http://mygovhelp.com/NAPERVILLEIL/_cs/QuestionEdit.aspx?qid=4939
Thank-you for using the City of Naperville Citizen Support Center.
Confidentiality Notice
This e-mail and any files or documents transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they were addressed. This e-mail and any attached
materials constitute claims, loss or risk management information, communications and/or advice and are therefore privileged from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and the
information attached hereto, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached material is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact/reply to the sender of this message immediately.
This is an auto-generated e-mail and has originated from an unmonitored email account. Please DO NOT REPLY.
Page 2 of 6 XFINITY Connect
3/17/2012 http://sz0048.ev.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=273683&tz=America/Chicag...
From : City of Naperville Citizen Support Center Support <napervilleil@mycusthelp.com>
Subject : City of Naperville Citizen Support Center - Response to Question #W004939-040610 :: W004939-040610
To : KimBeem@comcast.net
Wed, Apr 07, 2010 05:40 AM
Your Question:
I received a harassing phone call from my sister in Ohio over a family issue. I will be contacting Comcast (my land line carrier) and Sprint (my cell carrier) to have
her phone numbers blocked. How do I go about making a non-emergency police report to have a record of the incident? Her information is Alyson Beem 2300
Watkins Road S.W. Pataskala, Ohio 43062. The cell number she called from is 614-668-6321. Although she owns a gun, I am not concerned about her coming
here because of the distance but she is currently unemployed so has time on her hands. Thank you for your assistance.
Our Response:
Ms. Beem,
Unfortunately, we have recently changed the hours of operation at our front desk, and it is closed at 6:00 p.m. through 7:00 a.m. during the week. My suggestion is that you
call our non-emergency telephone number, 630-420-6666. You'll be transferred to a dispatcher, and an officer can be sent to your home. Or, if you're not comfortable with
an officer coming to your home, ask the dispatcher to have an officer call you regarding a harassment by telephone investigation. I hope this information is helpful.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me directly at 630-305-5476.
Commander Mike Anders
You can monitor your question online by clicking the link below. If the link is not clickable, please copy and paste the URL into your web browser.
http://mygovhelp.com/NAPERVILLEIL/_cs/QuestionEdit.aspx?qid=4939
Thank-you for using the City of Naperville Citizen Support Center.
Confidentiality Notice
This e-mail and any files or documents transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they were addressed. This e-mail and any attached
materials constitute claims, loss or risk management information, communications and/or advice and are therefore privileged from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and the
information attached hereto, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached material is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact/reply to the sender of this message immediately.
This is an auto-generated e-mail and has originated from an unmonitored email account. Please DO NOT REPLY.
Page 3 of 6 XFINITY Connect
3/17/2012 http://sz0048.ev.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=273683&tz=America/Chicag...
From : Kim Beem <KimBeem@comcast.net>
Subject : Now Beth is harassing.
To : 'Mark Beem' <mebeem@embarqmail.com>, 'Suzy Sifrit' <suzyb_1960@yahoo.com>
Wed, May 05, 2010 02:24 PM
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: KimBeem@comcast.net
To: "Beth Beem" <beembeb@embarqmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 9:09:35 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: You initiated this harassment so leave me alone!
I am being instructed by whom? Sierra is a legal adult and if she wants to discontinue contact with me, all she has to do is say so.....and to date she
has not. She probably will after you and Kay coach her. Without you around, she simply said she didn't want to be involved and wanted us to work it out -
have it in her text message. So once again, you are manipulating.
I have made no false accusations. Don't play the wonderful daughter now when you were never there - yes, you lived close but you just wouldn't
inconvenience yourself. And don't play the wonderful mother since we all know what kind of mother you are. When we go to court, the truth will come out
and there is nothing you can do about that and it may make a difference in your child support issues. Your constant crying poor to Mom is the catalyst for
most of this. It's hardly my fault that you built a life that was dependent on child support without your realiization that eventually your kids would become
adults.
Everyone knew Mom's state of mind because she told everyone that's why there will be several witnesses who can testify to what she told them. I don't
question Dad's intelligence, I question his ability to understand contracts. He never had to because Mom always took care of it - just like you have no
understanding of contracts. If you did, you would know that the trust doesn't make anything equal. As dumb as you are, I would think even you would know
that 7 and 3 are not equal. Curious how you will get sufficent land that you can split it into 2 lots and give it to your children because it's 3.5, which is over the
3 acre minimum. Suzy, on the other hand, will have to chose between her children because a split to 1.5 acres makes the land useless. Did you think about
that? Do you really believe that it is fair that Ridge will get 3.5 acres and I'll only get 3? Equal - grow up. Let's get to the truth, which is you coerced Mom.
You and Kay are having a fit because I won't roll over and play dead. I have no idea how you thought you would get away with stealing from the rest of us
but I'm certain there is a special place in hell for both of you. Face facts, you are afraid the trust will be rescinded and it will go back to the status in the will
when everything was equal for over 30 years - rather than this little 10 month thing you put together before Mom's death. If it goes back to the will, you will
get your fair share - your problem is that you won't get more than your fair share as you do with the trust.
Your stupidity wears on me. Read the trust, try to understand or maybe you can get someone to help you with the big words, Don't bother me again and
realize you initiated this exchange so who is the one harassing (another big word you should look up).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Beth Beem" <beembeb@embarqmail.com>
To: "KimBeem" <KimBeem@comcast.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 7:19:09 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: leave my family alone
You are being instructed to stay away from my family, Sierra tried to inform you nicely that she doesn't want to be involved but with your twisted mine you
tried to change that into her betraying me, which will never happen. Who is the evil person by trying to use someones children against them, I suggest you
seek mental help with the false accusations youve been making about me.None of the things you are saying ever happened and you are well aware of that. I
didn't even know what the trust stated until you started digging into things and how dare you question moms state of mind or dads intelligence. What kind of
a evil child would take there own parents to court. They have worked extremely hard ther entire lives l to have what they do and for you to question them is
unforgiveable along with the stress you have put our father through. Let's get to the truth of the matter you are only upset with the trust because mom and
dad chose me over you as trustee and now I understand why, I would do as they wish and keep everything equal unlike you who is only worried about what
your getting. If this isn't about greed, like you state, why are you so worried about what my children would get. Kay and I would be fair to everyone unlike you
who only wants control. I am not even sure why you are so worried about this if you haven't realized Dad is still with us and proably healthier then any of us,
If you contact anyone in my direct family again you will be harassing us, Sierra maybe a legal adult but she is in college, which I am paying for, and you are
distrubing her studies and my work. Do not contact us again.
From : Kim Beem <KimBeem@comcast.net>
Subject : RE: Your Fat
To : 'Alyson Beem' <alysonbeem@gmail.com>
Cc : Beth <beembeb@embarqmail.com>
Mon, Jun 14, 2010 11:56 PM
As per my voicemail yesterday, please have all of my belongings from your house at Dad's house no later than 4:00 pm on Saturday so I may pick them up. Additionally, please prepare a
bill for whatever you think I owe you from when you invited me to stay with you rather than with Mom and Dad when I came back from MN - a move that Mom encouraged. I will prepare a
bill from when you moved in with me after you graduated from college and only paid $200 for rent and utilities to offset what you are now claiming from your invitation. Remember, you ask
to live with me when you graduated and you ask me to stay with you when I moved home from MN. It's typical of the way you and Beth make decisions then never take responsibility for
your actions.
Your assertion that I "lose" one job after another has no merit and can be proven wrong. It would be most helpful to all concerned if you would stop your childish behavior. I'm so looking
forward to sharing your "Fat Ass" email in court when you are trying to profess how fair you are - sort of like you and Beth excluding me from family gatherings and getting nothing for Suzy
for her 50th birthday. I'm sure you will try to find a way to make that Mom's wishes.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alyson Beem [mailto:alysonbeem@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 11:01 AM
To: kimbeem
Subject: Your Fat
Fat Ass,
Immediate employment is not a concern for me, because I received a very generous severance package ( based on my 13 yrs of tenure and six figure salary. ) Just so you'll
know, I was making six figures long before you ever did. ( In Ohio, where the cost of living is far less than Chicago, and with the additional benefit of a company car!)
I have plenty of money. I don't live paycheck to paycheck, lose one job after the other, and continually mooch off of family members. FYI, when you lose your current job
( as I am sure you will ) - you won't be living off of me again.
Page 4 of 6 XFINITY Connect
3/17/2012 http://sz0048.ev.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=273683&tz=America/Chicag...
From : Joan Durnell <JDurnell@insight.rr.com>
Subject : Re: Your Continued Harassment
To : Kim Beem <KimBeem@comcast.net>
Wed, May 05, 2010 06:58 AM
What the hell is going on??? She is frigging nuts. Did Sierra have a problem with you? I thought you were on good terms with her. Your e-mail to Kay was right on point. --- Original
Message -----
From: Kim Beem
To: Kay Beem
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 12:53 AM
Subject: Your Continued Harassment
Kay,
On April 6th, I put you on notice that you were not to contact me again and I advised you that the Naperville Police had been advised accordingly, so the fact that you have once again
contacted me in such a threatening manner is inconceivable. Commander Mike Anders and I exchanged emails on the matter on April 7th. At that time, I opted not to press charges but
now that you have violated the notification, I may have to reconsider that position. The Naperville Police take domestic issues very seriously, especially since they are aware of your gun
ownership. I will be sure to advise them of the hollow point bullets. You have violated the law by contacting me again.
With respect to Sierra, she is a legally an adult and has chosen to have civilized exchanges with me. At no point has she indicated that she does not want to have contact with me. If that
is her position, not yours, she simply needs to say so but she has given no such indication to date. If she does, unlike you, I will honor her request as well as abide by the law.
I am well aware that you have become a regular at church - Pastor Mary told me - ask her if you don't believe me (and yes, I have it in writing). My assessment was that you have
realized what Beth has done and know the role you played in it so you began attending church in search of redemption for your part. She even duped you in getting you to go to her
attorney. As you know, there is a email from me to you subsequent to our conversation, prior to my seeing the trust. You had indicated that Beth's attorney,Vicky Christiansen said I
couldn't be an executor/trustee because I live out of state. You asked if she lied to you and I responded that yes she did - although the provision I cited may not be accurate, my
attorney, (yes, I have retained counsel) has assured me that I can live anywhere and be an executor or trustee. I can only imagine the net result of Vicky's lie to you, which would again
show more coercion. My understanding is that Vicky also uses the doctrine of closest and youngest, which has no merit under the law. I don't know if you and Beth shared that one with
Mom and Dad or it was something they picked up at one of the trust seminars they attended. Evil is exercising undue influence, as Beth did, on one's mother when she has repeatedly
stated that she wasn't making good decision and felt she wasn't getting sufficient blood/oxygen flow to her brain. This was a comment that she made to all of us as well as colleagues and
friends. There are volumes of medical evidence to show what Mom was experiencing was not at all uncommon for people who have had open heart surgery, especially for patients over
60. If you follow the path of what has been done, you would see that unless I am successful in contesting the trust, Beth's children will end up with everything. You know what has been
done to Mark. I will get nothing if I lose. Suzy only gets 3 acres and since St Albans Township requires a minimum of 3 acre lots, she will be forced to chose between her children as to
which one gets that land since splitting the lot to 1.5 acres renders it useless. If you have made her executor of your will, which I suspect since her attorney lied to you, they will get your
land too. Is that what our parents really intended? Do you really think Mom and Dad meant for me get to 3 acres and Ridge to have a minimum of 3 1/2 acres? If you and Beth need an
additional 4 acres as a buffer to protect your 3 acres from development, why wouldn't the rest of us need the same? For 32 years, a will was in place that had everything equally divided
among the 5 children. I was named co-executor with the survivor, either Mom or Dad. When that will was put in place, there were 3 minor children. If anything would have happened to
Mom and Dad at that time, I would have had to put my life on hold to raise you, Beth, and Suzy. Even with that additional responsibility, the terms remained everything was to be equal. It
wasn't a will that was written and just left as Mom contacted the attorneys on several occasions, including the week she had open heart surgery in July of 2006. In the face of possible
death, she did not change the will. She did prepare what I now know are letters of intent to convey her final wishes. We know that one of them was her obituary as Mom would not have
wanted anyone else to write her obituary. A logical conclusion is that Beth alone destroyed those letters because Mom didn't rewrite her obituary and unless you and Dad are worthy
of an Academy Award, neither of you knew they had been destroyed. Eventually you will have to realize that Dad didn't know what the trust did as I had to point out several things he
wasn't aware of and he even got out emails from Mom to the attorney to prove that had not been the intent. So if it wasn't the intent, why isn't he doing something about it. Dad didn't
understand it and Mom did not have the capacity to handle it with her failing decision making ability - not her fault at all, simply a result of her health issues and surgery.
You threatened to sue me for libel for making a comment about your use of anti-depressants, which is based in fact. That's a bit problematic since it was a private letter to my father with
his attorney copied - not a published document. As it had no impact on their impression of you, you suffered no damages so your suit would be frivolous. On the other hand, if you opt to
make disparaging comments about me in a public forum such as church, especially since the comments are untrue, I have every right to take action against you for slander. I will share
your comments with Pastor Mary so she will know your intent is clearly not in a Christian manner but a threat to me.
Once again, I will advise you not to contact me. I will decide in the coming days whether to press charges or not.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alyson Beem [mailto:alysonbeem@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 9:28 PM
To: KimBeem@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Carol L. Beem Trust
From : Kim Beem <KimBeem@comcast.net>
Subject : Case Number 10-011421 - Logistics
To : amurphy@lcounty.com
Sun, Oct 03, 2010 11:34 PM
Deputy Murphy,
As you consider my request for corrections, I ask that you also consider the logistics of the information that Kay provided to you, which I contend are lies.
The report states Kay and Dad were at the residence. It states that I was waving a club at "them". It states that I took off in my vehicle through the field to look for my father who was
mowing hay.
z If Dad was at the residence with Kay, why would I have left to look for him because according to her he was at the residence and I was waving a club at him?
z Why would I have driven to a field to look for him when, again, according to Kay, he was right in front of me having a club waved at him? (noting the field where my father actually
was and Kay lay in wait is approximately 3/10 miles by road from the house)?
z How was my father at the house having a club waved at him and mowing hay in a field 3/10 of a mile away at the same time?
Note the 911 call was made from Kay's cell phone in the field not from the landline in my parent's home 740-927-8030.
I assure you this entire thing is a nightmare for me and at some point Beth and Kay need to be held accountable by the proper authorities for their actions.
Again, thank you for your consideration,
Kim Beem
Correction Request Case Number 10-011421.doc
55 KB
Case Number 10-011421.pdf
Page 5 of 6 XFINITY Connect
3/17/2012 http://sz0048.ev.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=273683&tz=America/Chicag...
11 KB
Accident Report.pdf
44 KB
012311 Complaint.docm
41 KB
Page 6 of 6 XFINITY Connect
3/17/2012 http://sz0048.ev.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=273683&tz=America/Chicag...