Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Vp
Is
Im
If
Is
(b) Lagging Power Factor Operation
If
Im
Is
Vp
If cos()>Im, so Is is leading Vp
Is
(c)Leading Power Factor Operation
Figure 5. Phasor Representations of Power Factor Control
for IPM Wind Generator
Where, p is number of pole pairs,
m
is flux linkage due
to permanent magnet excitation, L
d
and L
q
are d-q axis
inductances, respectively; i
d
and i
q
are d-q axis currents,
respectively.
2230
The stator phase current i
s
is expressed as
d q i i i
2 2
s
+ = (8)
It is to be noted that the first term in (7) is identical to the
dc excited cylindrical-rotor (non-salient pole) synchronous
generator. It is important for indirect vector control of an IPM
wind generator. The 2
nd
term in equation (7) constitutes the
reluctance torque. Efficient utilization of this reluctance torque
component of equation (7) is most critical for higher
developed torque and more stable operation and relatively
higher efficiency improvement in IPM wind generators.
V. NON-LINEAR IPM MODEL
It is also to be noted that the torque equation (7) is quite
non-linear, because
m
, L
d
, L
q
, i
d
and i
q
are not constants. The
flux linkage
m
is responsible for excitation voltage E
o
, hence
it is also quite nonlinear. Figure 6 shows the second quadrant
of the B-H characteristic of the NEOREC 38SH permanent
magnets. It illustrates the remnant magnetization of NdFeB
magnet is reduced from 1.2 (T) at no load to 1.0 (T) along the
recoil line , when IPM wing generator is loaded. This in effect
changes the excitation voltage E
o
due to anisotropic NdFeB
magnet.
Figure 6. Second Quadrant of B-H Curve for NdFeB magnet
All these
m
, L
d
, L
q
, i
d
and i
q
five quantities vary during
dynamic operating conditions [7]. The requirements for
quality NdFeB magnets are high energy product, very large
coercive force, high Curie temperature, long life and corrosion
free environment, etc.
The non-linearity arises due to the intrinsic nature of
Nd
2
Fe
14
B metallic magnets. Like in other hard permanent
magnetic materials, the net spin moment of electrons in the
atomic structure of Neodymium material is not zero. When
magnetized by external magnetizing field, the metallic NdFeB
magnets are produced by sophisticated sintered axially pressed
process along the easy axis of magnetization. Furthermore,
when the IPM wind generator is delivering power, the
demagnetization of anisotropic NdFeB magnets takes place
along the principal stress axis, which is different from the easy
axis of magnetization. This process of magnetization and
demagnetization in the metallic Nd
2
Fe
14
B magnets gets further
complicated, when the magnets are oriented to an inclined
direction. The magnetic field produced by the inclined
permanent magnets has significant effect on the
demagnetization process. This will ultimately affect the d-q
axis inductance parameters L
d
and
L
q
more, depending on the
degree of magnet orientation and generator loading. Thus it
is perhaps obvious that the classical armature reaction of the
conventional synchronous wind generator or the surface
mounted permanent magnet wind generator is not strictly
applicable for the highly non-linear IPM wind generator with
inclined (v-shaped) NdFeB magnets under loaded conditions
even in the steady state mode of operations.
Another problem of IPM wind generator is the non-linear
demagnetization effect which occurs due to the combined
armature reaction and the rotor core high temperature, when it
is loaded. Analytically, the three dimensional (3-D) finite
element (FE) analysis is becoming essential to accurately
determine and verify the complex demagnetization effects of
the anisotropic Nd
2
Fe
14
B metallic magnets in an IPM wind
generator.
Nahata, el [13] have recently proposed a technique to
determine the remnant magnetization distribution from an
applied demagnetization field in anisotropic hard permanent
magnets using a combination of the 3-D variable
magnetization Stoner-Wohlfarth method in conjunction with
the 3-D FE analysis. It has been particularly noted in reference
[13] that the effect of the demagnetization fields is severe at
the edges of the metallic NdFeB magnets embedded inside the
rotor core of the IPM generator.
Like in conventional synchronous generators, the damper
(amortissuer) windings also play significant role in
reducing/eliminating the non-linear hunting/vibration of the
rotor of an IPM generator. It is quite obvious that the
electromagnetic fields induced in the damper/conductor cages
further complicate the field analysis of IPM wind generators.
Finite element (FE) analysis is a requirement for fine-tuning
the parameters determination of the IPM wind generators for
their optimum performances.
In summary, it may be stated that the linear model for
determining the developed power and torque in an IPM wind
generator is perhaps not adequate. One of the solutions to
approximate these non-linear effects is to modify the
developed torque expression of equation (7) by the following
expressions [7];
[ ]
[ ]
q d q mq lq q lmd ld
d0 q q m d
i ))i (i L (L - )) (i L (L
2
3p
) (i )i (i
2
3p
T
+ + +
=
(9)
and
2231
( )
=
md
q
md
d0
q
2
q d
d
X
di
dX
i
i X X
i (10)
Figure 7 shows the finite element based d-q axis magnetic
flux density distribution of rotor permanent magnets at full-
loads in IPM wind generator with straight magnet orientation
of figure 2. Design optimization of the IPM wind generator
system can also be carried out by various methods [24].
Another IPM wind generator schematic with v-shaped rotor magnets
arrangements is shown in figure 8. The finite element (FE) grid as
well as flux lines and flux density contours of figure 8 are shown in
figures 9-10, respectively. It is evident from figure 10 that the flux
distribution in an IPM wind generator undergoes significant changes
when loaded.
Fig 7. Flux Density distribution of IPM Wind Generator at full-load
Fig. 8. Stator and rotor schematic of IPM wind generator with
V-shaped rotor magnet
Fig. 9. Finite element grids and flux distribution of Fig.8
Fig. 10. Flux density contours of IPM Generator at full load
VI CONCLUSIONS
This paper provides a brief introduction of the classical
background and recent but timely updates on the advances in
the design, analysis and development of IPM wind generators.
It highlights many of their inherent advantages and serious
limitations. It ends with a short list of pertinent references in
order to stimulate further thorough investigations on all
aspects of the IPM wind generator technology worldwide.
REFERENCE
[1] H. Li and Z. Chen, Overview of Different Wind Generator Systems and
their Comparisons , IET Renewable Power Generation Journal , Vol.2,
No. 2, 2008, pp.123-138.
[2] M. A. Rahman, Advances of Modern IPM Motor Drives for High
Performance Applications, A keynote lecture, Proceedings of ICEMS-
2006 , Nagasaki, Japan, November 20-23, 2006.
[3] P.Zhou, Field and Circuit Combined Analysis of Permanent Magnet
Synchronous Motor, PhD Thesis, Memorial University of
Newfoundland, Canada, 1994
[4] S. Morimoto, H. Kato, M. Sanada and Y. Takeda, Output Maximization
Control for Wind Generation System with Interior Permanent Magnet
Synchronous Generator, Proceedings of IEEE IAS Annual Meeting,
Tampa, FL, October 4-8, 2006, pp. 503-510.
[5] S. Morimoto, H. Nakayama, M. Sanada and Y. Takeda, Sensorless
Output Maximization Control for Variable-Speed Wind Generation
System using IPMSG, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications,
Vol. 41, No. 1, January/February 2005, pp. 60-67.
[6] W. Wu, V. S. Ramsden, T. Crawford and T. Hill, A Low speed High
torque , Driect- Permanent Generator for Wind Turbines, Proceedings
2232
of IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, Rome, September 4-8, 2000, pp.
147-154.
[7] A. Consoli, G Scarcella ,, G. Scelba and S. Sindoni, Modeling Control
of IPM Motors, Proceedings of IEEE PES Annual Meeting,
Pittsburgh, July 20-24, 2008, CD ROM
[8] D. M., Vilathmugawa, W. Xiaoyu and C. J Gajanayake, Z- Source
Converter Based Grid-interface for Variable-speed Permanent Magnet
Wind Turbine Generators, Proceedings of IEEE PELS, PESC2008 ,
Rhodes Island, Greece, June 15-19, 2008, CD ROM
[9] J. A. Wiik, A.Kulka, T. Isobe, K. Usuki, M. Milanas, T. Takaku, T.
Undeland and R. Shimada, Control Design and Experimental
Verification of a Series Compensated 50 kW Permanent Magnet Wind
Power Generator, Proceedings of IEEE PELS, PESC2008 , Rhodes
Island, Greece, June 15-19, 2008, CD ROM
[10] M. Katter, Angular Dependence of Demagnetization Stability of
Sintered Nd-Fe-B Magnets, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 41,
No. 10, October 2005, pp. 3853-3855.
[11] S. Ruoho and A. Arkkio, Partial Demagnetization of Permanent
Magnets in Electrical Machines Caused by an Inclined Field, IEEE
Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 44, No. 7, July 2008, pp. 1773-1778.
[12] R. Skomski and J. M. D. Coey, Permanent Magnetism, College Park,
MD, USA, Institute of Physics, P. 230.
[13] Y.Nakahata, T. Todaka and M. Enokizono, Magnetization Process
Simulation of Anisotropic Permanent Magnets by Using Three-
Dimensional VMSW Method, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol.
44, No. 6, June 2008, pp. 858- 861.
[14] F.Gurakuq and G. Dieter, A New Electromagnetic Model for PM
Synchronous Machines, Proceedings of European Power Electronics
Conference, EPE-2007 , Aalborg, Denmark, September 2-5, 2007, CD
ROM.
[15] F. Marius, T. Lucian and I. Boldea , Novel Motion Sensorless Control
of Stand Alone Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator: Harmonics
and Negative Sequence Voltage Compensation under Nonlinear Load,
Proceedings of European Power Electronics Conference, EPE-2008 ,
Aalborg, Denmark, September 2-5, 2007, CD ROM.
[16] L. Hui, and C Zhe, Optimum Direct Drive Permanent Magnet Wind
Generator for Different Rated Wind Conditions, Proceedings of
European Power Electronics Conference, EPE-2008 , Aalborg,
Denmark, September 2-5, 2007, CD ROM.
[17] O .Kazuhiro, Modeling and Simulation of Variable Speed Wind
Generator System using Booat Converter for Permanent Magnet
Synchronous Generator, Proceedings of European Power Electronics
Conference, EPE-2007 , Aalborg, Denmark, September 2-5, 2007, CD
ROM.
[18] Y Young-Doo, L. Wook-Jin and S. Seung-Ki, New Flux Weakening
Control of High Saliency Interior Permanent Synchronous Machines
Without any Tables, Proceedings of European Power Electronics
Conference, EPE-2008 , Aalborg, Denmark, September 2-5, 2007, CD
ROM.
[19] M. Enokizono, Magnetic Characteristics Analysis of Electric
Machines by Dynamic Vector Magneto-Hysteretic Modelling,
Proceedings of International Aegean Conference on Electrical Machines
and Power Electronics, ACEMP-2007, Bodrum, Turkey, September 10-
12, 2007, CD ROM
[20] M. A. Rahman and P. Zhou, Field Circuit Analysis of Brushless
Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors, IEEE Transactions on
Industrial Electronics, Vol. 43, No. 2, April 1996, pp. 256-267.
[21] S. Jung, H. Jung S. Hahn andH. Jung, Optimal Design of Driect-driven
PM Wind Generator for Maximum Annual Energy Production, IEEE
Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 44, No. 6, June 2008, pp.1062-1065.
[22] H. Li and Z. Chen, Optimal Direct Driven Permanent Magnet Wind
Generator Systems for Rated Wind Speeds , Proceedings of European
Power Electronics Conference, EPE-2007 , Aalborg, Denmark,
September 2-5, 2007, CD ROM.
[23] G. Korouji and R. Hanitsch, Design and Construction of a Permanent
Magnet Wind Generator with a New Topology, Proceedings of ICEM ,
Krakow, Poland, September 5-8, 2004, pp. 87-90
[24] Y. Chen, P. Pillay and A. Khan, PM Wind Generation Comparison of
Different Topologies, Proceedings of IEEE IAS Annual Meeting,
Salt Lake City, October 3-7, 2004, pp. 1405- 1412.
[25] H. Polinder, F.F.A. van der Piji and P. J. Tavner, Comparison of Direct-
Drive and Geared Generator Concepts for Wind Turbines, IEEE
Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 21, No. 3, September 2006,
pp. 725-733.
.
2233