August 12 2014 Complete Agenda

MAYORANDCITYCOUNCIL
WORKSESSION
Tuesday,August12,20141:00PM
AClosedSessionisscheduledfrom10:30AM1:00PMtodiscusslegalandpersonnelmatters.
AGENDA
1. CALLTOORDER
2. REPORTONCLOSEDSESSIONTuesday,August12,201410:30a.m.1:00p.m.
3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSANDRECOGNITIONS
4. COMMENTSFROMTHEPUBLIC
AnypersonwhomaywishtospeakonamatterscheduledfordiscussionontheWorkSessionAgenda
maybeheardduringCommentsfromthePublicforaperiodofthree(3)minutesorsuchtimeasmay
bedeemedappropriatebytheCouncilPresident.Anyonewishingtobeheardshallstatetheirname,
addressandtheAgendaitemonwhichheorshewishestospeak.
5. NEWBUSINESS
A. PensionValuationReportpresentedbyEdKoebel,CavanaughMacdonaldConsulting,LLC
B. DiscussionofTownEquipmentandLaborPolicywithFeeGuidelinespresentedbySpecial
EventSuperintendent
C. RequesttoSoleSourcePurchaseAerationSystemfor100
th
StreetWaterTankpresentedby
PublicWorksChiefDeputyDirector
D. DiscussionofRunway14/32PavementMaintenancepresentedbyPublicWorksDirector
E. DiscussionofRunway02ObstructionRemovalpresentedbyPublicWorksDirector
F. RequesttoApproveStoneAggregateforCommercialParkingAreapresentedbyEnvironmental
Engineer
G. RequesttoApprovalPurchaseofFireStationAppliancesandBunkRoomFurniturepresented
byCityEngineer
H. CapitalImprovementPlanUpdatepresentedbyCityEngineer
I. RequestforAuthorizationtoProceedwithConstructionofSinglelaneBoatRamppresentedby
CityEngineer
6. ADJOURN

WORK SESSION -MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 12, 2014

2. Report on Closed Session August 12, 2014 10:30 a.m.
1:00 p.m. Legal and Personnel Matters

NOTICE OF CLOSED SESSION OF MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF OCEAN CITY

AUTHORITY: State Government Article: Section 10-508(a) Annotated Code of Maryland
PURPOSES:
X
1. To discuss:
(i) the appointment, employment, assignment, promotion, discipline, demotion,
compensation, removal, resignation or performance evaluation of
appointees, employees or officials over whom it has jurisdiction; or
(ii) any other personnel matter that affects one or more specific individuals;

2. To protect the privacy or reputation of individuals with respect to a matter that is
not related to public business

3. To consider the acquisition of real property for the public purpose and matters
directly related thereto;

4. Consider a matter that concerns the proposal for a business or industrial
organization to locate, expand or locate in the state;
5. Consider the investment of public funds;
6. Consider the marketing of public securities;
X 7. Consult with counsel to obtain legal advice;

8. Consult with staff, consultants or other individuals about pending or potential
litigations;

9. Conduct collective bargaining negotiations or consider matters that relate to the
negotiations;

10. Discuss public security if the public body determines that public discussion
would constitute a risk to the public or public security, including;
a) the deployment of fire and police services and staff; and
b) the development and implementation of emergency plans
11. Prepare, administer or grade a scholastic, licensing or qualifying examination;

12. Conduct or discuss an investigative proceeding on actual or possible criminal
conduct;

13. Comply with a specific constitutional, statutory or judicially imposed
requirement that prevents public disclosures about a particular proceeding or
matter; or

14. Before a contract is awarded or bids are opened, discuss a matter directly related
to a negotiation strategy or the contents of a bid or proposal, if public discussion
or disclosure would adversely impact the ability of the public body to participate
in the competitive bidding or proposal process

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 10:30 a.m.
PLACE: City Hall
SUBJECT: Legal and Personnel Matters
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
OTHER: FOR:

AGAINST:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
REPORT OF CLOSED SESSION
OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF OCEAN CITY

Prior to the open session of the Mayor and City Council being held on Tuesday,
August 12, 2014, a closed session was held on Tuesday, August 12, 2014 at 10:30
a.m. The following is a report of the closed session.
1. A statement of the time, place, and purpose of the closed session is attached.
2. A record of the vote of each member as to closing the session is attached.
3. A citation of the authority under the law for closing the session is attached.
4. (a) Topics of Discussion: Legal and Personnel Matters
(b) Persons present:
Mayor Richard Meehan
City Manager David Recor
Council President Lloyd Martin
Council Secretary Mary Knight
Council Members Doug Cymek; Margaret Pillas; Brent Ashley; Dennis Dare and
Joe Mitrecic
City Solicitor Guy Ayres
Executive Office Associate Diana Chavis

Action(s) taken:

Motion to close meeting:

Time adjourned:


4. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Any person who may wish to speak on a matter scheduled for discussion on the Work
Session Agenda may be heard during Comments from the Public for a period of three
(3) minutes or such time as may be deemed appropriate by the Council President.
Anyone wishing to be heard shall state their name, address and the subject on which
he or she wishes to speak.


5. NEW BUSINESS

A. Pension Valuation Report presented by Ed Koebel,
Cavanaugh Macdonald Consulting, LLC

TOWN OF
The White Marlin Capital of the World

TO: The Honorable Mayor, Council President and Members of Council
THRU: David L. Recor, ICMA-CM, City Manager
FROM: Wayne Evans, Human Resources Director
Martha Bennett, Finance Administrator
RE: Actuarial Valuation of Defined Benefit Pension Plans
DATE: August 1, 2014

ISSUE(S): Report of the Actuary on Annual Valuation as of April 1, 2014.
Presented by Ed Koebel, EA, FCA, MAAA, Cavanaugh Macdonald
Consulting, LLC.

SUMMARY: Due to actuarial gains, pension plan funded ratio increased from
78.4% to 85.8% for the public safety employees plan and from
85.2% to 90.7% for the general employees plan.

FISCAL IMPACT: Annual recommended employer contribution for FY15 is
$1,057,783 less than the FY14 employer contribution.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve contribution to Pension Plans for FY15 at actuarially
recommended contribution of $4,624,891 per Town funding
policies and approval of Pension Trustees at their meeting August
6, 2014. (Note: budget amount $5,954,154). Approve
contribution to Other Post Employment Benefit (OPEB) Trust at
budgeted amount of $3,083,000 per actuarial valuation prepared
by Bolton Partners on May 2, 2014.

Financially Sound Town Government

ALTERNATIVES: Do not fund pension plans or retiree health (OPEB) plan at
recommended contribution amounts.

RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Martha Bennett, Finance Administrator
Wayne Evans, Human Resources Director

COORDINATED WITH: Pension Plan Trustees

ATTACHMENT(S): PowerPoint presentation prepared by Ed Koebel

Agenda Item # 5A
Council Meeting August 12, 2014
Ocean City Valuation Results
April 1, 2014

The Employees of Ocean City, Maryland
Pension Plan

Ed Koebel, EA, FCA, MAAA Principal and Consulting Actuary

2
Plan Census Data April 1
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Actives 397 368 324 301 289 277
Retirees 99 107 140 150 155 165
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450

3
Annual Compensation & Benefits April 1
(thousands)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Compenation $20,595 $19,517 $17,316 $16,162 $15,371 $15,074
Benefits $717 $932 $1,739 $1,908 $2,081 $2,327
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000

4
Funding Valuation Process
Present Value of Future Benefits
(PVFB)
Actuarial Accrued
Liability (AAL)
Future Normal Costs
(NC)
Assets
(AVA, MVA)
Unfunded
Accrued
Liability (UAL)
Member
Portion
(5.00%)
Employer
Portion

5
($ thousands)
Total - $68,111.1
Age & Service
$63,141.4
Death $2,988.4
Disability $125.0
Separation $1,856.3

6
Plan Total Accrued Liability
($ thousands)
Inactive
Retiree
Active
Total
$0.0
$20,000.0
$40,000.0
$60,000.0
4/1/2012 4/1/2013 4/1/2014
Inactive $1,047.7 $951.3 $877.9
Retiree $18,396.4 $20,046.4 $22,357.8
Active $29,455.1 $29,747.4 $30,379.5
Total $48,899.2 $50,745.1 $53,615.2

7
Plan Cash Flow
-10,000
-8,000
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
$

T
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s

Benefit Payments Contributions Investment Income

8
History of Plan Asset Values
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
$

T
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s

Market Actuarial

9
Unfunded Accrued Liability
($ thousands)
April 1, 2014 April 1, 2013

1. Actuarial Accrued Liability

$53,615.2

$50,745.1

2. Actuarial Value of Assets

48,624.1

43,230.4

3. Unfunded Accrued Liability
(1. - 2.)

$4,991.1

$7,514.7

4. Funded Ratio (2. 1.)

90.7%

85.2%

10
Amortization of
Date
Established

Description
Initial
Amortization
Period
Initial
Amount
Remaining
Amount on
4/1/2013
Payment/
(Credit)
4/1/2014 Transitional UAAL 10 $4,991,119 $ 4,991,119 $ 676,405
$ 4,991,119 $ 676,405

11
Plan Actuarial Gain/Loss Analysis
($ thousands)
$379.3
$0.0
$33.5
($400.9)
$0.0
$61.1
$610.7
$1,212.1
Other
Transfers
Withdrawal
Mortality
Disability Retirement
Service Retirement
Salary Increases
Investment Return
Losses Gains Source

12
Plan Contribution Results
($ thousands)
April 1, 2014 April 1, 2013

1. Normal Cost

$1,966.6

$1,911.0

2. UAL Contribution

676.4

1,098.1

3. Total Required Contribution

2,643.0

3,009.1

4. Interest to Middle of Year

147.3

110.8

5. Participant Contributions

753.7

768.5

6. Employer (ER) Contribution
(3. + 4. 5.)

$2,036.6

$2,351.4

7. ER Contribution as Rate of Pay

13.5%

15.3%

Ocean City Valuation Results
April 1, 2014

Ocean City, Maryland Public Safety Employees
Pension Plan

Ed Koebel, EA, FCA, MAAA Principal and Consulting Actuary

14
Changes in Plan
The Plan was reopened effective July 1, 2013 for
new entrants hired on or after April 1, 2011.

15
Plan Census Data April 1
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Actives 179 177 165 150 140 157
Retirees 31 32 43 53 57 64
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200

16
Annual Compensation & Benefits April 1
(thousands)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Compenation $12,065 $12,119 $11,261 $10,249 $9,691 $10,541
Benefits $969 $1,008 $1,509 $2,028 $2,289 $2,588
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000

17
($ thousands)
Total - $76,252.9
Age & Service
$74,632.9
Death $401.3
Disability $0.0
Separation $1,218.7

18
Plan Total Accrued Liability
($ thousands)
Inactive
Retiree
Active
Total
$0.0
$20,000.0
$40,000.0
$60,000.0
4/1/2012 4/1/2013 4/1/2014
Inactive $250.3 $226.0 $201.8
Retiree $22,078.7 $24,757.8 $28,074.2
Active $29,597.4 $29,733.7 $28,957.5
Total $51,926.4 $54,717.5 $57,233.5

19
Plan Cash Flow
-10,000
-8,000
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
$

T
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s

Benefit Payments Contributions Investment Income

20
History of Plan Asset Values
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
$

T
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s

Market Actuarial

21
($ thousands)
April 1, 2014 April 1, 2013

1. Actuarial Accrued Liability

$57,233.5

$54,717.5

2. Actuarial Value of Assets

49,128.2

42,873.8

3. Unfunded Accrued Liability
(1. - 2.)

$8,105.3

$11,843.7

4. Funded Ratio (2. 1.)

85.8%

78.4%

22
Amortization of
Date
Established

Description
Initial
Amortization
Period
Initial
Amount
Remaining
Amount on
4/1/2013
Payment/
(Credit)
4/1/2014 Transitional UAAL 10 $8,105,273 $ 8,105,273 $ 1,098,441
$ 8,105,273 $1,098,441

23
Plan Actuarial Gain/Loss Analysis
($ thousands)
$228.9
$0.0
$0.0
$201.3
($125.3)
$0.0
$155.7
$822.4
$1,177.0
Other
Non-Recurring
Transfers
Withdrawal
Mortality
Disability Retirement
Service Retirement
Salary Increases
Investment Return
Losses Gains Source

24
Plan Contribution Results
($ thousands)
April 1, 2014 April 1, 2013

1. Normal Cost

$2,151.9

$1,922.3

2. UAL Contribution

1,098.4

2,038.5

3. Total Required Contribution

3,250.3

3,960.8

4. Interest to Middle of Year

181.2

145.8

5. Participant Contributions

843.3

775.3

6. Employer (ER) Contribution
(3. + 4. 5.)

$2,588.2

$3,331.3

7. ER Contribution as Rate of Pay

24.6%

34.4%


5. NEW BUSINESS

B. Discussion of Town Equipment and Labor Policy with Fee
Guidelines presented by Special Events Superintendent

TOWN OF

FROM: Frank C. Miller, Special Events Director
RE: Events Policy including Labor and Equipment Guidelines

ISSUE(S): Revisions to PPM 600-4, Events Permit Requests

SUMMARY: PPM 600-4 categorizes all events as Special Events when, in fact,
special events is just one of several event categories the Town hosts
annually. Along with the need to redefine events, there is a distinct
need to layout policy guidelines and costs associated with the use of
Town labor and equipment.

In the last two years, the number of events held in the Town has
more than doubled. Town support services are now being spread
thin between normal duties and special event needs. This is the
catalyst for discussion to track and charge for use of Town labor and
equipment.

Processes to vet upcoming events need to be defined in our policy
and labor and equipment costs tallied, so the Town may see the
price of hosting events. We may, in turn, choose to convey costs to
the promoter for services rendered.

FISCAL IMPACT: Increased revenue related to private events to offset costs incurred
where applicable. Potential reduction in number of private events.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve revised Policy and Fee structure with planned
implementation date of January 1, 2015.

1
st
Class Resort and Tourist Destination

ALTERNATIVES: Do nothing at this time or recommend modifications toward a
successful variation of the policy and pricing.

RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Frank Miller, Special Events Director

COORDINATED WITH: Recreation and Parks Committee
Hal Adkins, Public Works Director
John Vanfossen, Public Works Deputy Director
Thomas Dy, Public Works Maintenance Manager

ATTACHMENT(S): Revised PPM, fee costs and new Town Asset Request (TAR) form.

Agenda Item #
7/15/14 Private Event Policy and Fee Resolution Page 1
It is recommended to apply the following changes to PPM 6004 of the Town of Ocean
City Policy and Procedure Manual as noted by underlined type.

TOWN OF OCEAN CITY
OCEAN CITY, MARYLAND

POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

SECTION: Operations
PPM 600-4 SUBJECT: Events Permit
Requests
________________________________________________________________

An Event is any gathering, parade or event held on any public street, roadway,
beach, parking lot, Boardwalk or sidewalk within the corporate limits or on any other
municipal property of the Town of Ocean City, Maryland. Events shall further be
defined as follows:

Special Event (TYPE A) - any Town event produced under budgeted Town funds with
the intent to increase tourism and executed and managed by the Towns Special
Events Division.

Private Event (TYPE B) Any event in the Town of Ocean City produced by an
independent entity/promoter (for-profit or non-profit) utilizing public/town-owned
and/or managed property in whole or in part as a venue for said event. This includes
events held at the Ocean City Convention Center (OCCC) and events booked
through the Recreation and Parks Department (R&P) field and facility booking
process.

Value-Added Event (TYPE C) Any Town-owned event produced using budgeted or
appropriated Town funds with the intent to provide entertainment to the existing
residents or crowd-base and managed by the Special Events Division solely or in
conjunction with outside entities/promoters.

Marketing Activation (TYPE D) Any temporary stand-alone promotional effort in the
Town of Ocean City on public property produced by an independent entity with the
intent to promote a brand of products or services to Residents or Ocean Citys crowd-
base through professional interaction and product sampling with no exchange of
money or bartering.

Private Event, Non-Town Venue (TYPE E) Any event held solely on non-
public/non-Town-owned property utilizing Town equipment or services.

Non-Promoter Event, Private Equipment Use (TYPE F) Any use of Town-owned
equipment or Town services for events or needs not related to the public or crowd-
base and not intended to produce income.

Public Relations Event (TYPE G) An activity within the Town of Ocean City that
promotes the Town, assets unique to the Town and/or its family-friendly environment
and culture; whereas said activity is more robust than a Marketing Activation and/or
originated from a Town-induced solicitation or need.

Localized Residential Event (TYPE H) A residential event hosted by residents
within close proximity to the residents property or residents properties whereas no
official booking process exists and whereby a formal written request has been
received by requestor to modify public traffic patterns within the immediate area.
Requestor does not utilize said event to produce revenue. Example of this type
includes but is not limited to block parties and holiday tours where street(s) may be
shut down for pedestrian traffic.

Event Types B-D shall require a Private Event Permit to execute any and all
efforts requested. The opportunity to be granted a Private Event Permit is a privilege
the Town of Ocean City may confer on an applicant for use of property and/or assets
for an event. Private Events are permitted when they serve the community at large,
not just the applicant. Please refer to PPM 600-6 for use of municipal parks.

Event Types E-H shall have a Town of Ocean City Asset Request form
completed internally by the Private Events Coordinator for request dissemination to
proper departments for review and comment. Requests for these event types to
modify traffic or parking require review and approval by the Ocean City Police
Commission.

All Private Event applicants are required to file a "Private Events Application" with the
Private Events Coordinator at least 90 days prior to the requested event but no
sooner than one year prior to the requested start date. Applicants who are requesting
the use of City Park property should contact the Recreation and Parks Department
for reservation approval prior to submitting a private event application. The
reservation shall become part of the private event application submission and be
subject to City approval. Similarly, applicants who are requesting the use of Ocean
City Convention Center property should contact the Convention Center Sales
Department for reservation approval prior to submitting a private event application.
The reservation shall become part of the private event application submission and be
subject to City approval. Events solely held at OCCC or solely using a R&P
facility/field do not need to be vetted through the Private Event Application Process
unless they include use of TOC labor and assets outside of OCCC or R&P property
respectively.

The Mayor and City Council shall consider applications for Private Events at
their regularly scheduled Council Meetings, and a decision will be made at that time
to permit or not permit said event, establish conditions and act on Town equipment
and Town labor requests and other requirements. Date Only approval may be applied
for two years prior for events previously approved by the Mayor and City Council.
However, approved dates must comply with the normal application process or the
date will be forfeited. City-produced Special Events (Type A) and Town projects take
precedence over all other scheduled events and may supersede any scheduled
event at any time.

The applicant must complete a separate application for each event scheduled
on a separate date/weekend (e.g. event A executed as a series on separated
weekends/dates may not be identified on one application). A new application must
be submitted annually for recurring events. Applicants must complete and sign the
Hold Harmless Clause and all other disclaimers attached to the application.
Insurance coverage shall be occurrence form comprehensive general liability of at
least one million dollars ($1,000,000), combined single limit coverage with the Mayor
and City Council named as additional insured. A copy of the insurance certificate will
be kept on file in the Risk Management office and with the Special Events
Application.

Once the application is received by the Private Events Coordinator, it will be
routed to appropriate city departments for review, comment and pricing. A
coordination meeting may be required including the applicant and members of the
City Staff prior to submission to the Mayor and City Council for action. The Private
Events Coordinator will receive all staff reviews costs and recommended charges
and will adjudicate any issues arising from the reviews with the applicant. Local Non-
Profit Organizations whom maintain primary offices within Worcester County shall be
eligible for up to a 75% discount on labor and equipment charges. The discount(s)
shall be applied upon approval by Mayor and City Council. The Private Events
Coordinator shall review pre-discount costs and recommended charges with
Applicant if Applicant meets the above criteria. Once all issues are resolved, the
Private Events Coordinator will contact the applicant to schedule a mutually
agreeable date for the City Council agenda. The Private Events Coordinator will
request the City Manager's office place the item on the appropriate agenda for
consideration. A copy of the completed Private Events Application, pending charges
and staff review/costs/comments will be forwarded to the City Manager's office for
inclusion in the agenda packet. Final costs and recommended charges shall be
reviewed and are subject to modification by Mayor and City Council prior to approval.
Mayor and City Council approved charges shall be reimbursed to the Town of Ocean
City by Applicant.

The applicant or a representative shall appear at the Council Meeting to make
the formal request. City Council shall look favorably at applications produced and
managed by local County charity organizations. Upon approval or denial, the Private
Events Coordinator shall convey the results to Town staff, along with any changes,
conditions, or fees/charges placed upon the permitted use. Approved applications will
receive a Private Event Permit from the Town of Ocean City. Said permit shall be
prominently displayed at the event site.

The Town of Ocean City shall have the right to review and enforce all
requirements, conditions, policies, ordinances and laws during execution of said
event. Additional fees may be assessed if execution of said event falls outside the
event description, requirements, conditions and limitations as approved by Mayor and
City Council and/or if additional costs are incurred by Town to return the event venue
or Town hardware and assets to their condition prior to use by event.

Town equipment and labor costs will be set by resolution and are subject to
change from time to time as approved by the Mayor and City Council.

[end of policy revision]

Fee Resolution:

It is recommended to apply the following charges for Town Equipment and Labor
related to Type B F Events as defined in the revised Policy. Charges shall be
implemented at the start of the new calendar year January 1, 2015.
Asset availability and fees subject to change without notice.

Equipment ChargeEa.
Barricade(Type1)WoodenA(/day) $3.00
Barricade(Type2)SE,Aluminum(/day) $5.00
Barricade(Type3)WoodenLong(/day) $4.00
Barricade(Type4)Traffic,Plastic(/day) $4.00
TrafficCone(/day) $2.00
SandFence/Stakes(linearfoot)(/day) $3.00
55GlnTrashContainer(/day) $5.00
300GlnTrashContainer(/day) $50.00
8YardDumpster(/day) $125.00
30YardDumpster(/day) $250.00
55GlnTrashLiners(perbox) $25.00
ElectronicMobileMessageBoard(/hr) $50.00
ArrowBoard(/hr) $25.00
MobileLightCart(/hr) $30.00
CautionTape $25.00
110VoltService(20Amps)(/connect) $84.00
208VoltSinglePhase(30Amps)
(/connect) $112.00
208Volt3Phase(30Amps)(/connect) $126.00
ElectricCableExtension(/cable) $10.00
ElectricCableOutletTerminal(/cable) $18.00
25'ElectricCablew/QuadBox $35.00
GasLinewithRegulator(/ft) $75.00
WaterLine/Hose(/50'hose) $35.00
PortableStage24x40(/day) $350.00
4x4StagePlatformSection(/day) $20.00
PortableJudgesStand(/day) $125.00
SmallMobileBleachers(/day) $100.00
LargeMobileBleachers(/day) $250.00
BeachTractorTrailer(/day) $300.00
PremiumPASystem(/hr) $25.00
BasicPASystem(/hr) $20.00

Equipment ChargeEa.
Podium(perhour) $10.00
RoundTable $10.00
[NonOwnedEquip.Storage](/pc/day) $8.00
10x10EZUpTent(/day) $150.00
PortablePASystem,W/LMic(/day) $500.00
TicketBooth(peruse) $2,500.00
Gazebo(peruse) $2,500.00
SpringfestEntranceUnit(peruse) $650.00
EntertainmentTentChair(/day) $3.00
PicnicTable(perday) $25.00
MeetingFoldingChair(NSPvenue) $5.00
6'Table(undraped,NSPvenue) $16.00
LifeGuardStand(/day) $100.00
Table(draped)24"x4' $94.00
Table(Undraped)24"x4' $16.00
Chair $5.00
Easel $21.00
FlipChart $63.00
PipeandDrape(persection) $65.00
PipeandDrape(short) $54.00
RopeandStancion(per6') $40.00
110VoltService(20Amps) $126.00
208VoltSinglePhase(30Amps) $168.00
208Volt3Phase(30Amps) $188.00

ACTIVEHARDWARE/EQUIPMENT
DepartmentofPublicWorks Std.HourlyOTHourly
BeachTractor/Operator $86.06 $129.09
Forklift/Operator $76.07 $114.11
PickupTruck/Operator $42.21 $63.32
BucketTruck/Operator $76.07 $114.11
Bobcat/Operator $76.07 $114.11

DepartmentofPublicWorks Std.Hourly OTHourly
FlatbedTruck/Operator $42.21 $63.32
FlatbedTruck/Operator $42.21 $63.32
TractorTrailerTruck $76.07 $114.11
LgStreetCleaner/Operator $76.07 $114.11
SmLotCleaner/Operator $42.21 $63.32
ScissorLift/Operator $76.07 $114.11
ManLift/Operator $76.07 $114.11
BeachCanDisposalUnit/Op $42.21 $63.32
GarbageTruck/Operator $42.21 $63.32
ContainerTruck/Operator $42.21 $63.32
BeachPatrol
ATV/LifeGuard $41.07 $61.61
WaveRunner/LifeGuard $41.07 $61.61
Stand/LifeGuard $36.22 $54.33
Truck/LifeGuard $76.07 $114.11
TransportationDepartment
Shuttle/Operator $76.07 $114.11
Tram/Operator/Attendant $86.06 $129.09
Bus(Large)/Operator $86.06 $129.09
Bus(Small)/Operator $86.06 $129.09
ConventionCenter
Forklift&Operator(Pre) $50.00 $75.00
Forklift&Operator(Event) $74.00 $111.00
LABORPOSITIONS
DepartmentofPublicWorks
MaintenanceStaff $27.21 $40.82
Plumber $27.21 $40.82
Electrician $36.06 $54.09
ConstructionStaff $27.21 $40.82
EngineeringStaff $41.07 $61.61
WasteManagementStaff $27.21 $40.82
TollBoothOperator $27.21 $40.82
Supervisor $36.06 $54.09
BeachPatrol
LifeGuard $36.06 $54.09
Supervisor $36.06 $54.09
ConventionCenter
GeneralLabor/Manpower(Pre) $32.00 $48.00
GeneralLabor/Manpower(Event) $48.00 $72.00
Rigging(Pre) $50.00 $75.00
Rigging(Event) $74.00 $111.00
Supporting Comments & Guidelines

Town of Ocean City
Guidelines for TownOwned Equipment & Labor Usage by Outside Entities

These guidelines are designed to create an established system of tracking and approval
processes, costing, data sharing and inventory management methods. The system is to
be utilized by all participating departments and divisions within the Town of Ocean City
(TOC) as related to Town resources hard equipment assets and labor where resources
are allocated to a defined event. This documentation will address how outside entities
such as forprofit and nonprofit businesses, associations, individuals and other Town
divisions may apply for utilization of Town resources, the definitions by which each TOC
asset request shall be categorized, the documentation and updating of TOC available
asset inventory, the adaptations to the Private Event Application process and related
Town of Ocean City Policy 6004 wherein these procedures shall reside and the
disclosure of responsibilities and liabilities on both sides of the process.

Definition of Event Types: (established in recommended policy revision)

Definition of Procedures:

Any entity or person(s) interested in utilizing Townowned equipment or services
(hereinafter referred to as TOC Assets) must apply for TOC Asset use through the
appropriate process managed by the Private Events Coordinator. Type A events fall
under the formal budgeting approval processes set forth by the Town. Types B, C and D
shall follow the Private Event Application Process. Types E and F event types as well as
divisiontodivision requests shall complete a TOC Asset Request form (TAR) outside of
the Private Event Process. E, F, G and H event type TAR forms are processed
through the Private Events Coordinator outside of the Private Event Application Process.
DivisiontoDivision TAR forms are completed by the requesting entity with other
procedures as described herein.

Processed TAR forms, once approved through the Private Event Application process or
simply through division approvals (pending process path as described above) are
recorded electronically in the appropriate shared drive. TAR forms are filed
electronically using the month and date of start of usage on the shared drive. TAR forms
attached to events through the Private Event Application process are also recorded
within the appropriate private event folder managed by the Private Event Coordinator.
Forms may be reviewed electronically from the shared drive by TOC employees for
reference, inventorying, or to confirm overall allocation of TOC Assets. [Eventually this
data SHOULD be tracked via a serverbased asset database, consider the database a
future implementation]

Emergency and Disaster Relief needs supersede these guidelines to avert processing
time; although, usage should be tracked, once time allows, to keep accurate inventory
and usage information.

Reasonable Need vs. Competitive Use:

The condition under which the TOC asset is used and origin of the request plays a major
role in determining how policies and guidelines are applied. Complete information will
generally lead to applying the following definitions to the TOC Asset request justifying
the path of support to be considered. The definitions are as follows:

Reasonable Need The TOC Asset request originates from within the Town of Ocean City
as a requirement to meet local municipal expectations or needs or the request is deemed
as a justified responsibility (legal or otherwise) of the Town, a unique asset belonging to
or in possession of the Town or the Town forces preference that said TOC asset is to be
used over other external asset sources.

Competitive Use Intent to use the TOC Asset in an effort to replace similar assets
available externally at a trackable cost to requestor or the TOC asset is not a TOC
necessity or requirement and is an enhancement that ccan be duplicated in general
through an external provider.

TOC Asset Costing:

A cost must be associated with the TOC Asset use regardless of how the use has been
defined. Costs shall be used to track Investment by Town, Internal Job Cost and /or
toward Fees incurred by Requestor. These costs shall be estimated by the originating
department, approved by the Mayor and City Council and uniformly applied for event
needs Townwide. Costs may differ from those applied to other needs such as disaster
relief and Government to Government invoicing. Costs shall be simple in structure when
in the form of public information and may be further broken down internally for
budgeting.

How Costs are Applied:

The information below is related to the application of costs, not whether or not the costs
are billable back to the event.

TOC Hardware Assets inherently have a cost associated with them. The Town realizes
expenses for hardware from equipment purchase or asset creation and from raw
materials, maintenance, storage, depreciation and transportation. A cost needs to be
associated with each Asset to cover the value of use and duration of the items use.

In terms of TOC Labor Assets or Services, there are two schools of thought. First is if staff
is placed on a job related to an event, that labor cost should be reflected as an event cost.
Use of staff for tasking outside of the positions normal duties results in a delay in
completing those normal duties therefore the cost is specific to the event. The second
perspective is if the staff is assigned during regularly scheduled hours completing work
within their scope of expertise for which they were hired and the job does not incur
overtime, there is no need to push the related cost to the event. If the labor is assigned
during hours not regularly scheduled, then the hours are justified for billing.

Use of Town vehicles and equipment requiring an operator inherently has a combine
cost for equipment use and labor costs to operate said equipment. For the purpose of
showing a cost for these operated Town assets, the assets have one a single hourly rate
to cover the package of hardware and labor.

Use of TOC Equipment and Labor for needs related to Event Types A and C also have
conditions when it comes to method of application. Since these event types are produced
by the Town using Town funds as the primary financing source and under the Towns
budget, short duration needs and lowvolume needs by the Town from existing Town
assets shall not be billed out by the supplying department. Long duration needs and
highvolume needs may be billed out to the event through and at the discretion of the
Towns Budget Manager upon the request of the source Department or Division. At all
times, labor and equipment usage shall be tracked by the source department and
communicated to the department or division producing the event upon completion of
needs. Assets for Town events should not be billed as the assets already belong to the
Town for use by the Town.

For Event Types B and E, all planned or anticipated usage of Town Equipment and Labor
should be scheduled with an attached cost. These costs will be communicated through
the Private Event Application process to the Mayor and City Council for review and
consideration. Mayor and City Council (M&CC) have the right to, with all department
comments considered, choose what costs if any shall be removed as an expense to an
event. The application of whether assets are in place for a reasonable need or
competitive use should be considered at this time. The standard practice will be to
invoice the event billing contact for approved charges unless otherwise directed.

Event Types B, C and D shall not be approved by the Mayor and City Council without all
Department comments received and the formal submission thereof to the Mayor and
City Council by the Towns Private Event Coordinator. These comments and job costing
figures along with other event details are vital in all Event considerations.

ForProfit vs. NonProfit

ForProfit and NonProfit entities shall receive the same consideration and cost
structure as costs incurred by the Town do not change for type of promoter. The Mayor
and City Council shall look favorably upon Private Event Applications submitted for
events organized and managed by nonprofit organizations with established offices
within Worcester County. Aforementioned nonprofit applications shall receive a 75%
discount on application and space use fees upon the approval of Mayor and City Council.

InSeason vs. ShoulderSeason

A more vital condition to be considered by M&CC when determining viable billable
expenses is time of year event is to be executed, TOC staffing demands for the dates of
the event in question and availability of TOC Assets requested. For management of the
processes and assets as described herein, FIVE SEASONS shall be defined:

WINTER SEASON January 2
nd
March 15
th
(low demand, low staffing)
SPRING SEASON March 16
th
Start of Memorial Day Weekend
(medium demand, medium staffing)
SUMMER SEASON Start of Memorial Day Weekend Labor Day
(high demand, max staffing)
FALL SEASON Labor Day October 31
st

(medium demand, medium staffing)
HOLIDAY SEASON November 1
st
January 1
st

(medium demand, low staffing)

Seasons correlate to not only saturation of private events but also to availability of
Town staff and equipment for vital and fundamental annual job duties, activities and
expectations required by Town Departments during that same time frame. These other
responsibilities play a key role in the Towns ability to complete nonstandard addon
tasks requested to support Private Events.

Impact vs. Investment

An important argument when reviewing requested use of Town assets (labor and
equipment) is impact on the Town versus the required investment by the Town. Impact
includes variables such as lodging room nights gained solely by the event taking place
(positive), media exposure generated (positive), anticipated consumption of goods and
entertainment within the Town by event attendees (positive), general parking depletion
(negative), displacement of normal usage amenities such as square footage of public
beach consumed by an event normally used by general tourists (negative), and
correlation to Towns values and reputation (variable) among others. Investment is
defined by the amount of resources (financial and physical) required by the event from
the Town to successfully execute said event. Financial investments can take on two
iterations: (1) To cover the cost of assets necessary for the safety of Town patrons,
elements deemed executable by the Town only or as a proprietary executable need; or
(2) as a monetary request such as seed funding, marketing support, or donation of labor
and equipment. The latter relates back to the subject of Reasonable Need vs. Competitive
Use.


Payments to Town for Assets Used:

Upon cost approval by Mayor and City Council for an event; costs shall be conveyed to
event promoter for review and acceptance. Approval of costs shall be due no later than
30 days prior to event or within three business days of M&CC approval. Upon final
acceptance of costs to be incurred by event. A payment structure shall be enacted with
the following:

50% of all equipment derived costs due at time of approval
75% of all labor derived costs due at time of approval
Balance due 5 business days prior to start of event
Rented equipment insurance policy in place for all TOC provided equipment with
Mayor & City Council, Town of Ocean City, MD as additional insured.

EVENTS WITH MOU
Payment schedule to be established within MOU
Rented equipment insurance policy in place for all TOC provided equipment with
Mayor & City Council, Town of Ocean City, MD as additional insured.

Failure to pay as per the appropriate payment structure places the event at risk of losing
services and/or Town assets.

Equipment Tracking

The Private Event Coordinator under the Special Events Division shall track all
equipment scheduled for use and approved by M&CC and the event promoter. Each
department/division allocating equipment and/or labor shall also track assets sourced
by their department to a given event using the same data sheet. Last minute additions
need to be added on both sides of allocation for auditing as necessary.

Town of Ocean City, Maryland Sample Rev. 071514
Event Support Document

TOWN ASSET REQUEST FORM

All Townowned equipment requested for use by an Event or third party shall be
requested herein. Equipment and labor needs not listed on this form will not be
considered for availability or use by event or party.

ITEM QTY
USE
DESC
DATE
IN
TIME
IN
DATE
OUT
TIME
OUT
TOC
COST

Event Name: _________________________________ Load In: Date(s): ____________________

Contact Name: _______________________________ Event Date(s): _______________________

Contact Phone: ______________________________ Load Out Date(s): ___________________

Email: ________________________________________ Location: _____________________________


5. NEW BUSINESS

C. Request to Sole Source Purchase Aeration System for 100
th

Street Water Tank presented by Public Works Chief Deputy
Director

25166
TOWN OF

FROM: Jim Parsons, Public Works Chief Deputy Director
RE: Sole Source Purchase of Aeration System for 100
th
Street Water Tank

ISSUE(S): An aeration system is needed in the 100
th
Street water tank in
order to comply with MDE water quality requirements.

SUMMARY: An engineering evaluation was performed by the Towns
consultant and two types of aeration system were identified as
being appropriate for the 100
th
Street water tank.

One type involves the installation of mechanical equipment inside
of the water tank, and the other features mechanical equipment
that is located outside of the tank. The engineering evaluation
located only two vendors whom are prominent in the
manufacture and installation of in-tank aeration systems for
potable water tanks. One vendor offers both the interior and
exterior equipment options; the other vendor offers only the
interior equipment option. After careful consideration and a field
visit to view a similar installation at a large facility in the
Washington DC metropolitan area, the system that keeps the
equipment outside of the tank is the design that is recommended
by staff. Therefore, this item is a sole source purchase.

FISCAL IMPACT: $301,290.00

This is a planned expenditure for FY15 and funding is present in
the FY15 Water Department budget.

RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the purchase and installation of the USCI/PAX system
as detailed in the proposal from Utility Service Company Inc.

Excellent Service through a High Performing Town Organization

ALTERNATIVES: None as this system is necessary to maintain compliance with
MDE requirements.

RESPONSIBLE STAFF:

Jim Parsons, Public Works Chief Deputy Director
COORDINATED WITH: Hal Adkins, Public Works Director
Howard Iman, Water Superintendent
Dean Dashiell, Senior Project Engineer

ATTACHMENT(S): Proposal from Utility Service Company, Inc.

Agenda Item # 5C


5. NEW BUSINESS

D. Discussion of Runway 14/32 Pavement Maintenance
presented by Public Works Director

25166

TOWN OF

FROM: Hal O. Adkins, Public Works Director
RE: Pavement Maintenance Runway 14/32

ISSUE(S): Pavement Maintenance Project Runway 14/32 (East/West
Runway)

SUMMARY: Runway 14/32 was last resurfaced in the early 1980s. The
current runway surface is in need of substantial maintenance
repairs to assure its life expectancy until FY17/18 when we hope
to gain FAA/MAA Grant assistance for runway
rehabilitation/reconstruction.

FISCAL IMPACT: The project budget is $100,000.00 and will be funded by a 75%
MAA Grant ($75,000) with a local match of 25% ($25,000)
available from Airport Revenues.

RECOMMENDATION: Proceed with acceptance of Grant and scheduling of repairs this
fall via current unit price based contract with George and Lynch,
Inc.

1
st

ALTERNATIVES: No alternatives suggested. Repairs are necessary to prevent
surface failure.

RESPONSIBLE STAFF:

Hal O. Adkins, Public Works Director
COORDINATED WITH: Jaime Giandomenico, Airport Manager
Jennie Knapp, Budget Manager
Ashish Solanki, MAA
David Jones, P.E., Delta Aviation

ATTACHMENT(S): 1) Scope of Work Statement
2) PCI Pavement Condition Index
3) FY15 MAA Special Grants Spreadsheet prepared by the MAA
4) Three current photos of Runway 14/32 cracks

Agenda Item # 5D


5. NEW BUSINESS

E. Discussion of Runway 02 Obstruction Removal presented by
Public Works Director

25166

TOWN OF

FROM: Hal O. Adkins, Public Works Director
RE: Runway 02 Obstruction Removal

ISSUE(S): Obstruction (Tree) Removal Runway 02s 20:1 Visual Approach
Surface

SUMMARY: Numerous penetrations into Runway 02s visual approach surface
have been identified by the FAA and must be removed in an
effort to restore Instrument Approach Procedures (IAPs).

FISCAL IMPACT: This project is funded at a total value of $146,667 and supported
by a MAA Grant for 75% ($110,000) with a local match of 25%
($36,667) that consists of current local match allocations and
supplemental Airport Revenues.

RECOMMENDATION: Proceed with acceptance of the Grant and bidding of the
Obstruction Removal efforts.

1
st

ALTERNATIVES: Continue with restricted use of the runway that reduces its
overall utility.

RESPONSIBLE STAFF:

Hal O. Adkins, Public Works Director
COORDINATED WITH: Jaime Giandomenico, Airport Manager
Jennie Knapp, Budget Manager
Ashish Solanki, MAA
David Jones, P.E., Delta Aviation

ATTACHMENT(S): 1) Scope of Work
2) FY15 MAA Grant Spreadsheet as prepared by Ashish Solanki
3) FAA TERPS 20:1 Visual Surface Evaluation Report dated
October 31, 2013
4) Map of Denoted Obstructions

Agenda Item # 5E
Council Meeting August 12 2014


5. NEW BUSINESS

F. Request to Approve Stone Aggregate for Commercial
Parking Area presented by Environmental Engineer

TOWN OF

FROM: Gail Blazer Environmental Engineer
RE: Request to approve alternative pervious surface for at Guido Burrito Restaurant
DATE: July 25, 2014

ISSUE(S): Using stone aggregate for a commercial parking lot

SUMMARY: Owner of Guido Burrito at 3303 Coastal Hwy requests the use of
GeoPave system with aggregate fill on the required parking lot.

The property is limited on the stormwater management measures
that would be feasible. Maintaining a pervious surface would
negate the need for a structural measure. Per Parking Lot Paving
Standards adopted by the Council, use of stone aggregate for a
commercial lot requires City Council approval.

FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable

RECOMMENDATION: The Engineering Department does not oppose the use of the plastic
GeoPave system along with the aggregate because products like
these provide for better traction on the stone, keep the stone
contained and from compacting; while providing a pervious surface
for infiltration. However, dust and loose stone debris are a concern.

Revitalized Ocean City: Development and Redevelopment

ALTERNATIVES: Require other pervious surface such as pervious pavers, asphalt or
concrete. Or, if a regular impervious surface is provided, more
extensive stormwater management structures would be required.

RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Gail Blazer, Environmental Engineer
Terence McGean, City Engineer

COORDINATED WITH: Chris Carbaugh, Atlantic Group (Consultant for owner)

ATTACHMENT(S): 1) Site Plan of project
2) Geopave Design and Construction Brochure

Agenda Item # 5F
PRESTO

PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS
670 N PERKINS STREET, APPLETON, WISCONSIN, USA 54914
Ph: 920-738-1328 or 800-548-3424 Fax: 920-738-1222
e-mail: INFO@PRESTOGEO.COM WWW.PRESTOGEO.COM/
GP-001 FEB 2014

GEOPAVE

POROUS PAVEMENT SYSTEM
DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OVERVIEW
PRESTO
GEOPAVE


GP-001 FEB 2014
Table of Contents
The GeoPave Porous Pavement System Components ........................................................................ 1
Figure 1 The GeoPave Porous Pavement System ................................................................................ 1
Function of the GeoPave System Components ........................................................................................ 1
Function of the GeoPave Unit ................................................................................................................ 1
Function of the Base Material ................................................................................................................ 1
Function of the Optional Geosynthetic Layer ........................................................................................ 1
Function of the Optional Sub-drain Component .................................................................................... 1
GeoPave Material Properties & Unit Dimensions ..................................................................................... 1
Table 1 GeoPave Porous Pavement Unit ........................................................................................... 2
Figure 2 GeoPave Unit Nominal Dimensions ........................................................................................ 2
Figure 3 GeoPave Cell Configuration .................................................................................................... 2
Design Guideline ......................................................................................................................................... 3
Table 2: Base Recommendations for the GeoPave Unit .................................................................... 3
Infill Materials .............................................................................................................................................. 4
Aggregate Infill ........................................................................................................................................... 4
Aggregate/Topsoil Engineered Infill .......................................................................................................... 4
Base Materials ............................................................................................................................................. 4
Aggregate Base ......................................................................................................................................... 4
Aggregate/Topsoil Engineered Base .......................................................................................................................... 4
Key Porous Pavement System Characteristics ....................................................................................... 5
Elements Important to Structural Integrity ................................................................................................. 5
Figure 2 GeoPave System Dimensions and Layout .............................................................................. 6
Figure 3 GeoPave System Material Properties and Usage Guideline .................................................. 7
Installing the GeoPave System .................................................................................................................. 8
Subgrade Preparation ............................................................................................................................... 8
Optional Geosynthetic Separation Layer .................................................................................................. 8
Optional Sub-Drainage Component .......................................................................................................... 8
Base Preparation ....................................................................................................................................... 8
GeoPave Unit Installation .......................................................................................................................... 8
Orientation & Laying Pattern of Units .................................................................................................... 8
Figure 4 Laying Patterns ........................................................................................................................ 8
Positioning of Units ................................................................................................................................ 9
Figure 5 Joining GeoPave Units ............................................................................................................ 9
Figure 6 The U-Clip Connection Device ................................................................................................................. 9
Optional Anchoring of Units ................................................................................................................... 9
PRESTO
GEOPAVE

GP-001 FEB 2014
Figure 7 Optional Stake Anchoring ........................................................................................................ 9
Infilling the GeoPave Unit ........................................................................................................................ 10
Seed or Sod for Vegetated Systems ................................................................................................... 10
Delineation for Vegetated Systems ..................................................................................................... 10
Maintenance ............................................................................................................................................ 10
Estimating Time and Cost of Installation ............................................................................................... 11
Typical Crew Size and Responsibilities .................................................................................................. 11
Equipment Needed and Purpose ............................................................................................................ 11
Typical Construction Sequences and Times ........................................................................................... 11
Table 2 Approximate Quantities of Infill Material Required for GeoPave Unit .................................... 11
General Notes ......................................................................................................................................... 11
Total Time and Materials Required ......................................................................................................... 12
Total Cost of Time and Materials ............................................................................................................ 12
Limited Warranty ....................................................................................................................................... 13
Disclaimer .................................................................................................................................................. 13

PRESTO
GEOPAVE

PAGE 1 OF 13 COPYRIGHT 2014 PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS GP-001 FEB 2014
The GeoPave Porous Pavement System Components
The GeoPave Porous Pavement System with aggregate or an
aggregate/topsoil engineered infill provides a permeable,
stabilized surface for vehicular and pedestrian load support.
The complete system has three major components:
(1) the GeoPave unit
(2) the porous aggregate or aggregate/topsoil engineered
base, if required
(3) the porous aggregate or an aggregate/topsoil
engineered infill.
Other components may include a geosynthetic separation /
reinforcement layer between the subgrade and base materials
and sub-drain components.
Natural Ground
GeoPave Unit
Aggregate Base
(if required / depth varies)
Crushed Aggregate
Infill
Crushed Aggregate
Infill
Geotextile Underlayer
(if required)
Natural Ground
GeoPave Unit
Aggregate Base
(if required / depth varies)
Crushed Aggregate
Infill
Crushed Aggregate
Infill
Geotextile Underlayer
(if required)

Figure 1 The GeoPave Porous Pavement System
Function of the GeoPave System Components
Function of the GeoPave Unit
The function of the GeoPave unit is to 1) create a structural framework to stabilize open-graded aggregate or an
aggregate/topsoil engineered infill and to 2) increase bearing strength for vehicular or pedestrian traffic loading requirements
using porous aggregate or other structural infill.
Function of the Base Material
For a given applied load over an existing sub base soil, both the base material, if required, and the GeoPave unit with crushed
aggregate or a structural infill provide support. The depth of the base material should be determined using both loading
requirements and sub base strength (Reference Table 1).
Function of the Optional Geosynthetic Layer
Under some conditions, a geosynthetic layer may be a required component between the in-situ soil and the required base layer
in the porous pavement system. Generally, the geosynthetic component will serve one or more of the following functions and
be one or more of the following materials:
Tensile Reinforcement Geosynthetics: ....
Separation Geosynthetics: ......................
Drainage / Separation Geosynthetics: .....
Woven geotextiles, Geogrids
Non-woven geotextiles, Woven geotextiles
Non-woven geotextiles, Geonet / geotextile separation / drainage materials
Function of the Optional Sub-drain Component
If the porous pavement system is built over non-porous soils and an excavation is required such that water could be trapped,
sub drainage becomes a required component of the system. Sub-drainage will remove harmful water accumulation that will
cause degradation of the in-situ soils resulting in loss of support capacity. See Optional Sub-Drainage Component under
Installing the GeoPave System for additional details.
GeoPave Material Properties & Unit Dimensions
GeoPave units shall be made from materials with physical and chemical characteristics described in Table 1. The
manufactured GeoPave unit shall have a minimum deflection without breakage of 1.0 in (25 mm) when units are supported at
40 in (0.50 m) centers at 70F (21C). The color shall be uniform throughout all units in any given pallet.
GeoPave units shall have physical dimensions as specified in Table 1 and shown in Figure 2. GeoPave units shall contain a
herringbone-type cell pattern consisting of small and large cells with a mesh bottom and vented side-walls. The monolithic
mesh bottom is comprised of a series of square 0.25 in by 0.25 in (6.35 mm by 6.35 mm) openings. The small cells contain
1.0 in (25 mm) high and 0.50 in (12 mm) wide vented cell-wall openings, either 4 or 6 per cell for infill lock-up and lateral
drainage between cells. The large cells contain vented cell-wall openings, 12 per cell.
The GeoPave units shall be connected with U-CLIPS side-to-side and end-to end where the short cell side-walls of adjacent
units align. The connection points vary depending on chosen laying pattern (See Figure 8 Laying Patterns). End-to-end or
side-to-side warping of the GeoPave unit shall not create a greater opening between adjacent outside walls than 0.25 in
(6 mm). The finished GeoPave pavement is a uniformly connected, laterally integrated porous pavement system.
PRESTO
GEOPAVE


GP-001 FEB 2014 COPYRIGHT 2014 PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS PAGE 2 OF 13
Table 1 GeoPave Porous Pavement Unit
Item Specification & Details
Material Up to 97% Recycled Polyethylene *
Color Ranges Dark Shades Gray to Black
Chemical Resistance Superior
Carbon Black for Ultraviolet Light Stabilization 1.5% - 2.0%
Unit Minimum Crush Strength (Empty) @ 70F (21C) 175 psi (1,202 KPa)
Unit Minimum Crush Strength (Aggregate or Aggregate/Topsoil -
Filled) @ 70F (21C)
1,000 psi (6,869 KPa)
Flexural Modulus @ 70F (21C) 35,000 psi (240,000 kPa)
Nominal Dimensions (width x length) 20 in x 40 in (0.5 m x 1.0 m)
Nominal Unit Depth 2.0 in (50 mm)
Nominal Coverage Area 5.3 ft (0.5 m)
Cells per Unit 50
Small Cell Size 3.25 in x 3.25 in (83 mm x 83 mm)
Large Cell Size 3.25 in x 6.5 in (83 mm x 165 mm)
Top Open Area per Unit 90.5%
Bottom Open Area per Unit 32.6%
Bottom Mesh Opening Size 0.25 in x 0.25 in (6.35 mm x 6.35 mm)
Weight per Unit (nominal) 8 lbs (3.6 kg)
Runoff Coefficient @ 2.5 in/hr (64 mm/hr) Rainfall with open-graded
aggregate
(0-0.15)
Runoff Coefficient @ 2.5 in/hr (64 mm/hr) Rainfall with engineered
infill
(0.10-0.35)
Units per Pallet 46
* The percentage of recycled content may vary depending on availability of recycled materials.
Dimensions and weight are subject to manufacturing tolerances and are influenced by recycled components.
End-to-end or side-to-side warp of the GeoPave unit shall not be greater than 0.5 in (6 mm).
Avoid specifications that state material compressive strength only. Material compressive strength, with applied
factors of safety must be sufficient to resist compressive and lateral loads. In addition, ultra-high compressive
strength adds little value to a porous pavement system.

Figure 2 GeoPave Unit Nominal Dimensions

Figure 3 GeoPave Cell Configuration
PRESTO
GEOPAVE

Design Guideline
Table 2: Base Recommendations for the GeoPave Unit
LOAD DESCRIPTION
1

DEPTH OF BASE DEPTH OF BASE
AGGREGATE
ENGINEERED
AGGREGATE / TOPSOIL
3

CBR
2
2 4 CBR
1
>4 CBR
2
2 4 CBR
2
>4
Heavy Fire Truck Access & H/HS-20 loading. Typical
110 psi (758 kPa) maximum tire pressure. Single axle
loadings of 32 kips (145 kN), tandem axle loadings of 48
kip (220 kN). Gross vehicle loads of 80,000 lbs (36.3 MT).
6 in
(150 mm)
6 in
(150 mm)
Not
Recommended
Not
Recommended
Light Fire Truck Access & H/HS-15 loading. Typical 85
psi (586 kPa) maximum tire pressure. Single axle loadings
of 24 kips (110 kN). Gross vehicle loads of 60,000 lb (27.2
MT).
6 in
(150 mm)
4 in
(100 mm)
Not
Recommended
Not
Recommended
Utility & Delivery Truck Access & H/HS-10 loading.
Typical 60 psi (414 kPa) maximum tire pressure. Single
axle loadings of 16 kips (75 kN). Gross vehicle loads of
40,000 lbs (18.1 MT).
4 in
(100 mm)
2 in
(50 mm)
4 in
(100 mm)
2 in
(50 mm)
Cars & Pick-up Truck Access. Typical 45 psi (310 kPa)
maximum tire pressure. Single axle loadings of 4 kips (18
kN). Gross vehicle loads of 8,000 lbs (3.6 MT).
2 in
(50 mm)
None
4

2 in
(50 mm)
None
4

Trail Use. Loading for pedestrian, wheelchair, equestrian,
bicycle, motorcycle and ATV traffic.
None
4
None
4
None
4
None
4

1
The GeoPave system can be applied in areas where loading is greater than those listed above. In these situations, call Presto
Geosystems or an authorized Presto Geosystems representative for specific recommendations.

2
CBR is the abbreviation for California Bearing Ratio. Methods for determining CBR vary from more sophisticated laboratory
methods to simple field identification methods that use hand manipulation of the soil. Presto does not recommend one method
over the other; however, the user must have a high degree of confidence in the results produced by the chosen method. If other-
than-CBR soil strength values exist, use available correlation charts to relate the value to CBR.
3
With the aggregate/topsoil mix and a vegetative surface, infrequent/occasional passes are recommended. Infrequent/occasional
passes are defined as the number of passes over any period of time that causes no lasting damage to the vegetation. This
number will be a function of vegetation type and age, climatic conditions, and maintenance practices. This number is not a
function of the GeoPave material.
4
A minimum of 2 in (50 mm) of aggregate base should be placed below the GeoPave units as a drainage layer and an infiltration
storage area. Greater depth may be required depending upon design rainfall needs and sub base permeability.

PRESTO
GEOPAVE


Infill Materials
The recommended infill shall be an aggregate or an aggregate/topsoil engineered infill for aggregate and vegetated pavements
respectively. When specifying infill type, consideration should be given to appropriateness of infill for loading requirements,
traffic frequency, and subgrade strength.
Aggregate Infill
The aggregate infill shall be a well-graded 0.375 in to 0.5 in (10 mm to 13 mm) crushed angular stone with a fine content less
than 5%.
Aggregate/Topsoil Engineered Infill
The aggregate/topsoil engineered infill shall consist of a homogenous mixture consisting of 1) a clear-stone/crushed rock having
an AASHTO #5 or similar designation blended with 2) pulverized topsoil and 3) a void component generally containing air and/or
water. This homogenous mixture will promote vegetative growth and provide required structural support. The aggregate portion
shall have a particle range from 0.375 in to 0.5 in (10 mm to 13 mm). The percentage void-space of the aggregate portion shall
be at least 30%. The pulverized topsoil shall equal 33% of the total volume and be added and blended to produce a
homogenous mixture prior to placement.
Choice of vegetation shall be determined based upon local climate and proposed use.
Base Materials
If necessary for loading requirements, the recommended base shall be aggregate or an engineered aggregate/topsoil mixture,
and should be consistent with the chosen infill type.
Porous Base for Storage
A minimum of 2 in (50 mm) of base material is generally recommended for drainage even if not required by design for load
support. Additional base depth may be added if required over a low-permeable base or to function as a storm water
detention/retention layer.
Under some conditions, a geotextile separation layer may be required between the natural ground and the base material. See
Optional Geosynthetic Separation Layer, Optional Sub-Drainage Component, and Base Preparation for information
relative to installation. Care shall be exercised in choosing this layer to assure that it does not impede permeability.
Aggregate Base
When the specified infill is aggregate, the aggregate base shall
be a poorly-graded crushed aggregate with a fine content less
than 5%. The aggregate shall be compacted to 95% Standard
Proctor Density. After compaction, the surface shall be uniform
with no protrusions from larger aggregate particles.

Base Particle Size Passing Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size % Particles Passing Opening
in 95-100%
3/8 in 15-20%
#4 0-5%

Aggregate/Topsoil Engineered Base
When the specified infill is an aggregate/topsoil engineered mix for vegetated surfaces, the base material shall be an
aggregate/topsoil engineered mixture. A free-draining aggregate base is not recommended for porous pavements intended to
be vegetated. The aggregate/topsoil engineered base ensures proper moisture retention and the nutrient component required to
maintain healthy vegetation.
The aggregate/topsoil engineered base shall consist of a homogenous mixture consisting of 1) a clear-stone/crushed rock
having an AASHTO #5 or similar designation blended with 2) pulverized topsoil and 3) a void component generally containing air
and/or water. This homogenous mixture will promote vegetative growth and provide required structural support. The aggregate
portion shall have a particle range from 0.375 in to 1.0 in (10 mm to 25 mm) with a D
50
of 0.5 in (13 mm). The percentage void-
space of the aggregate portion when compacted shall be at least 30%. The pulverized topsoil shall equal 33% of the total
volume and be added and blended to produce a homogenous mixture prior to placement. The mixture shall be compacted to
95% Standard Proctor Density.
PRESTO
GEOPAVE

Key Porous Pavement System Characteristics
Elements Important to Structural Integrity
The GeoPave unit (or any other similar material) must have five primary characteristics to adequately support loads, eliminate
expansion-related failures, and to enable fast and efficient construction. Those characteristics are:
(1) suitable wall strength
(2) sufficient unit stiffness
(3) a supporting base, if required
(4) a large overall area and
(5) a monolithic mesh bottom
1) Suitable Wall Strength: The wall strength must support wheel loading from the heaviest anticipated vehicles that will travel
over the porous pavement system. Vehicular loading will create direct wall compression from tires and equipment outriggers
as well as lateral forces from vehicle breaking and acceleration. The wall should resist vertical and lateral deformations
when loaded. Caution should be exercised when using systems with thin walls.
2) Sufficient Unit Stiffness: The unit stiffness must allow deflections without unit breakage or separation when sub base soils
yield under loading. When the unit is too flexible, the base soils support the complete load. When the unit is too rigid, it could
break under normal loading in low temperature conditions. Caution should be exercised when using systems that are either
too flexible or too rigid.
3) Supporting Base if required: The unit support base must have a large enough area-of-contact with the base soil so high
wheel loads at the top of the unit are reduced sufficiently when transferred to the base soil. This will provide a system with a
greater range of stability. Caution should be exercised when using systems that have little contact area between the porous
pavement unit and the base soil.
4) Large Overall Area: A large overall area, in conjunction with the other characteristics, ensures maximum load dissipation. If
unit separation should occur and any given unit functions independently, larger unit areas will lower the pressure on base
and subgrade soils. Caution should be exercised when using systems that have smaller contact areas.
5) Monolithic Mesh Bottom: The unit should contain a monolithic mesh bottom for encapsulating the aggregate infill and
preventing material loss from the bottom of the units when exposed to repeated loading and freeze-thaw cycles. Caution
should be exercised when using systems without monolithic mesh bottoms.
PRESTO
GEOPAVE

GP 001-FEB 2014 COPYRIGHT 2014 PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS PAGE 6 OF 13

Figure 2 GeoPave System Dimensions and Layout
PRESTO
GEOPAVE

PAGE 7 OF 13 COPYRIGHT 2014 - PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS GP-001 Feb 2014

Figure 3 GeoPave System Material Properties and Usage Guideline
PRESTO
GEOPAVE

GP-001 FEB 2014 COPYRIGHT 2014PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS PAGE 8 OF 13
Installing the GeoPave System
Subgrade Preparation
Excavate the area, allowing for the GeoPave unit thickness and the base material depth (where the base material is
required). When working with in-situ soils that have poor permeability, provide adequate drainage from the excavated area if
the area has the potential to collect water. The in-situ soil should be relatively dry and free from any standing water. Finish-
grade the surface of the in-situ soil specifically when the GeoPave unit is to be installed without additional base material.
Level and clear the area of large objects such as rocks, pieces of wood, etc. to enable the GeoPave units to connect properly
and remain stationary after installation.
Sub base or base, when required, shall be compacted and fine graded as appropriate. Caution should be exercised to
assure that porous sub bases not be over compacted such that porosity is hindered.
Optional Geosynthetic Separation Layer
If required and/or specified by the project engineer, the geosynthetic layer shall be rolled out over the prepared subgrade
along the alignment of the reinforced surface. The geosynthetic shall be pulled taut to ensure that there are no folds.
Geosynthetic layer overlaps, if required, shall be according to plans and manufacturers recommendations.
Optional Sub-Drainage Component
If required and/or specified by the project engineer, install the specified sub-drain and outlet according to construction
drawings. Ensure that a proper slope is maintained throughout the drainage system and that the outlet is free from any
obstructions preventing free drainage.
Base Preparation
If required, the specified base material is spread over the prepared base, compacted to 95% Standard Proctor Density and fine
graded as appropriate. Caution should be exercised to assure that porous sub bases are not over compacted such that porosity
is hindered. Refer to Table 2 for base depth recommendations.
GeoPave Unit Installation
Orientation & Laying Pattern of Units
Place the GeoPave units with the mesh bottom to the
ground.
When the application is a narrow pedestrian access
lane, stagger the units to produce the bricklayer or the
offset pattern.
When the application is a large area, stagger the
units to produce the herringbone pattern. This pattern
reduces straight seams to one and a half block lengths
and allows for better disguise of the unit seams.
The staggered pattern is developed by using half
GeoPave units made by field cutting a full unit and
placing the units as illustrated. Cut the units with a hand
or power saw to custom fit both contours and/or around
obstructions. These final seam patterns assure
maximum load transfer and support and improved
aesthetics.
Other laying patterns are generally not recommended.
Bricklayer Herringbone
Offset
Bricklayer Herringbone Herringbone
Offset Offset

Figure 4 Laying Patterns
PRESTO
GEOPAVE

Positioning of Units
If required, ensure that all adjacent hard-surfaced paving
work is completed before installing the GeoPave porous
pavement system.
Place the first row of GeoPave units against a stationary
edge when available. Units should be placed such that
corners and seams do not protrude above the desired
surface elevation. Abut adjoining units to form the desired
laying pattern.

Figure 5 Joining GeoPave Units

Secure adjoining GeoPave units together using the
U-CLIP connection device. U-CLIPS shall be set in
place by hammer in the half-wall locations. There are
four locations on each long side and two locations on
each short side. They shall be driven completely so
that adjacent sections have horizontally level
profiles. Caution should be exercised to assure that
no material is trapped between adjacent sections
prior to the placement of U-CLIPS.

Figure 6 The U-Clip Connection Device
Optional Anchoring of Units
The GeoPave units can be fixed in-place
with 0.5 in (13 mm) #4 rebar to prevent
movement of the units. Anchoring may be
necessary if the GeoPave units are
placed on a slope (5-10%).
The anchors can be driven through the
cell-wall vent holes either in the middle of
the GeoPave units or along the perimeter
as required.
Anchoring units in-place should occur
after installation of all the units within the
defined area.

Figure 7 Optional Stake Anchoring
PRESTO
GEOPAVE

Infilling the GeoPave Unit
Infill the GeoPave units with the specified material for the intended application. Infilling should take place immediately after the
units are installed to minimize movement of the units.
Infill shall be placed with each successive pile of aggregate or aggregate/topsoil mixture to be placed at the edge of previously
filled GeoPave units and spread with a skid steer, small tractor or small loader. Spread the infill material uniformly over the units.
Hand raking will be performed to assure that the aggregate fill is at the top of the cell walls.
Follow procedures for applying seed or sod. No specific compaction will be required, but traffic will allow for the slight settlement
of the infill material under ordinary use.
Upward buckling of the GeoPave area is generally not an issue if the units have been installed using the recommended laying
patterns and infilled appropriately.
Seed or Sod for Vegetated Systems
Once the aggregate/topsoil engineered mixture is evenly spread in the GeoPave units, either grass seed or sod may be applied.
If using sod, the GeoPave units should be under filled by 1.0 inch (25 mm) to allow room to seat or press the sod within the
GeoPave units.
Follow good seeding, fertilizing, and water procedures for turf establishing based on regional practices.
Delineation for Vegetated Systems
With vegetated systems, once healthy turf has been established, the GeoPave structure will have minimal visibility when good
turf maintenance practices are followed. Delineation may be desirable to create visibility for access lanes. Delineation methods
include in-ground curbing, above-ground curbing, shrubbery or vegetation, perimeter lighting or delineation markers
Maintenance
Aggregate Surface Wear Course
When the pavement surface is aggregate, the surface should be inspected from time to time to identify signs of slight cell infill
loss. If cell infill loss occurs, additional infill material should be added.
Vegetated Surface
When the pavement surface is vegetation, lawn care should follow normal watering, fertilizing and mowing procedures.
Vegetated surfaces are intended for infrequent or occasional traffic with a maximum H-10 loading. The pavement should be
monitored to ensure traffic frequency and loading does not exceed the pavement design.
Snow Removal
If required, snow removal should be done using one of the following basic procedures:
Keep a metal edged plow blade a minimum of 1.0 in (25 mm) above the surface during plowing operations, or
Use a plow blade with a flexible rubber edge, or
Use a plow blade with skids on the lower outside corners so that the plow blade does not come in direct contact with the
porous pavement system.
When deeper ground freeze occurs, the system functions as a typical hard pavement surface. If a sharp metal plow-blade
comes in direct contact with the surface during plowing, any portion of the GeoPave system that protrudes above the normal
surface level could be damaged or removed by the blade.

PRESTO
GEOPAVE

Estimating Time and Cost of Installation
Typical Crew Size and Responsibilities
2 Crew to set the GeoPave units in place.
NOTE: Adding or subtracting one or two people to the crew may
result in a cost-effective productivity increase depending on local
work efficiencies.
2 Crew to spread and level the specified infill.
1 Equipment operator for the front-end loader.

Equipment Needed and Purpose
Saws, U-clips (may be purchased from Prestos distributors/representatives) and anchors (if required) all or some of these
are used for cutting and securing the GeoPave units as required per the plans or as needed during construction.
A small tractor/backhoe or loader for infilling of the GeoPave units.
Rakes and shovels for final leveling of the infill material.
Typical Construction Sequences and Times
Productivity is a variable and the ranges below are typical. Select an installation rate through personal experience or after
discussion of project details with Presto or one of its qualified distributors.
1. Place the GeoPave units on the prepared base and install connecting U-clips. 60-75 units/man-hr
2. Fill the in-place GeoPave units using the small loader or backhoe to evenly distribute
the specified infill.
100 - 120 units/man-hr
3. Level the infill using rakes and shovels. If aggregate, overfill the top of the cell walls 0.5
in (13 mm). If aggregate/topsoil mixture, rake flush with the top of the cell walls.
75 - 100 units/man-hr
NOTE: The above three sequences can be in progress at the same time if workspace is adequate.
Table 2 Approximate Quantities of Infill Material Required for GeoPave Unit
Depth of unit
Volume of Aggregate Required
per unit
Volume of Aggregate Required
per 1000 ft (100 m)
2 in (50 mm) 0.0293 yd (0.0224 m) 5.447 yd (4.48 m)
General Notes
1. The tractor/backhoe loader must be sized so it can distribute the fill material per time/productivity requirements.
2. Experience shows that the above installation rates would be considered typical rates of installation.
3. As is with all construction operations, placement of material stockpiles, crew productivity, jobsite conditions, special
installation requirements such as cutting and custom fitting of the GeoPave units, etc. significantly affect overall productivity,
therefore actual results may be different than the estimates above.
PRESTO
GEOPAVE


Total Time and Materials Required
Area of installation = length x width of site
(________) ft (m) long x (________) ft (m) wide = (________)ft (m) Area
GeoPave units required = ft (m) (Area 5.38 ft (0.50 m)/unit
[the GeoPave unit is 20 in x 40 in (0.50 m x 1.00 m) nominal]
(________) ft (m) Area 5.38 ft (0.50 m)/unit = (________) units
Man-hr required for installation of GeoPave units = GeoPave units 75 units/man-hr
(________) units 75 units/man-hr = (________) man-hr
Infill material quantities = GeoPave units x yd (m)/unit (see Table 2)
(________) units x (________) yd (m)/unit = (________) yd (m)
Man-hr required for placing infill = GeoPave units 120 units/man-hr
Man-hr required for leveling of infill = GeoPave units 100 units/man-hr
Man-hr required for placing base material = GeoPave units 100 units/man-hr

Total Cost of Time and Materials
GeoPave unit cost $________/unit x ________units = $
Cost of Infill $________/yd (m) x ________yd (m) = $
Cost of Labor $________/man-hr x ________man-hr = $
Cost of Equip. Operator $________/man-hr x ________man-hr = $
Cost of Front-end Loader $________/hr x ________hr = $
APPROXIMATE TOTAL COST $
PRESTO
GEOPAVE


Limited Warranty
Presto Geosystems warrants each GeoPave unit which it ships to be free from defects in materials and workmanship at the
time of manufacture. Prestos exclusive liability under this warranty or otherwise will be to furnish without charge to Prestos
customer at the original f.o.b. point a replacement for any unit which proves to be defective under normal use and service
during the 10-year period which begins on the date of shipment by Presto. Presto reserves the right to inspect any allegedly
defective unit in order to verify the defect and ascertain its cause.
This warranty does not cover defects attributable to causes or occurrences beyond Presto's control and unrelated to the
manufacturing process, including, but not limited to, abuse, misuse, mishandling, neglect, improper storage, improper
installation or improper application. Presto makes no other warranties, express or implied, written or oral, including, but not
limited to, any warranties or merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose, in connection with the GeoPave system. In
no event shall Presto be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages for the breach of any express or
implied warranty or for any other reason, including negligence, in connection with the GeoPave system. Contact Presto
Products Company, Ph: 800-548-3424; 920-738-1328 or Email: info@prestogeo.com.
Disclaimer
This document has been prepared for the benefit of customers interested in the GeoPave Porous Pavement System. It was
reviewed carefully prior to publication. Presto assumes no liability and makes no guarantee or warranty as to its accuracy or
completeness. Final determination of the suitability of any information or material for the use contemplated, or for its manner of
use, is the sole responsibility of the user.
Project specifications take precedence over all manufacturers recommendations.
Geosystems
and GeoPave are registered trademarks of Reynolds Presto Products Inc. The GeoPave system is patent
pending.

4.8'
5.6'
5.9'
4.60'
5.1'
10.6'
5.9'
TRANSFORMER
5
' S
I D
E
W
A
L
K
4.41'
4.65'
1
0
.5
'
4.9'
5.6'
5.0'
4.4'
4.5'
1
0
.6
'
N
7
1
5
5
' 0
1
.4
"
W
1
1
0
.5
0
'
C
U
R
B
C
U
T
N
O
R
T
H

3
3
R
D

S
T
R
E
E
T
(
R
O
W

V
A
R
I
E
S
)
5
' S
I D
E
W
A
L
K
EX. CB
RIM = 4.81'
2
4
. 1
'
4.8'
4.65'
5.2'
5.3'
2
4
.2
'
DWELLING
52.1'
EXISTING
1 STORY
52.2'
CONC. DECK
5.3'
C
O
N
C
. W
A
L
K
5.0'
4.9'
N
6
2
3
2
'0
1
.4
" W
1
3
4
.7
0
'
C
U
R
B
C
U
T
4.3'
4.4'
4.76'
5.3'
4.7'
4.5'
5.0'
4.90'
7
6
.9
'
5.7'
5.23'
5
' S
I D
E
W
A
L
K
4.7'
4.5'
4.6'
4.3'
4.3'
EX. CB
RIM = 4.10'
4.5'
5.0'
5.0'
5.1'
69.1'
5.3'
1
4
.1
'
4.9'
4.6'
5.0'
39.5'
CONC. PAD
CONC.
LANDING
5.0'
EXISTING TOP OF SLOPE
PARCEL: 4362
TAX MAP: 112
N 1138'58.6" E 229.00'
EXISTING BOTTOM OF SLOPE
5.3'
6.2'
5.1'
6.5'
5.3' 5.1'
5.1'
5.1'
6.8'
5.1'
6.5'
GRASS AREA
6.8'
4.8'
7.3'
6.8'
4.8'
5.1'
GRASS AREA
5.4'
4.5'
4.3'
4.3'
4.4'
4.4'
4.5'
5.0'
5.2'
4.8'
5.1'
6.7'
4.7'
6.5'
6.7'
6.5'
R = 5669.58'
5.4'
EXISTING SIDEWALK (WIDTH VARIES)
6.33'
T
H
E
S
A
N
D
B
A
R
S
IG
N
TILE WALK
CONC. WALK
13.2'
5.49'
5.9'
ELEC. VAULT
6.3'
5.84'
5.34'
C
O
N
C
. W
A
L
K
6.05'
6.4'
6.19'
6.3'
5.0'
2
9
.9
'
& THE SANDBAR LOUNGE
EXISTING ANGELO'S RESTAURANT
123.5'
8
. 0
'
6.6'
3
2
. 4
'
8
. 0
'
40.5'
5.5'
5.5'
CONC. CURB
COASTAL HIGHWAY 120' ROW
5.3'
ASPHALT
4.5'
4.9'
5.0'
4.8'
5.0'
5.1'
4.7'
4.5'
4.6'
4.6'
4.8'
4.8'
5.2'
5.0'
5.2'
5.2' 4.9'
5.0'
4.9'
5.2'
5.1'
4.7'
S
7
8
2
1
'0
1
.4
"
E
2
5
0
.0
0
'
4.2'
7.1'
4.2'
4.5'
6.5'
5.0'
4.7'
4.8'
ASPHALT PARKING
7.1'
CURB CUT
NOTE: EXISTING ELEVATIONSARE REFERENCED TO
BENCHMARK OCM 12 (1999). ELEV. = 9.79' (1929 DATUM)
5.3'
CURB CUT
6.24' CONC. CURB
ANGELO'S RESTAURANT SIGN
5.7'
5.3'
6.21'
5.5'
6.49'
5.4'
6.5'
5.3'
CONC. CURB
6.3'
6.53'
5.7'
NORTH PER PLAT O.D.C. 2/23
7.9'
7.0'
TAX MAP: 112
PARCEL: 4362
PARCEL: 4362
TAX MAP: 112
T
H
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
O
N
T
H
E
S
E
P
L
A
N
S
, P
L
A
T
S
O
R
O
T
H
E
R
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
S
I
S
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
F
O
R
T
H
E
E
X
C
L
U
S
I
V
E
U
S
E
O
F
T
H
E
C
L
I
E
N
T
N
A
M
E
D
H
E
R
E
O
N
, A
N
D
I
S
S
U
B
J
E
C
T
T
O
T
H
E
C
L
I
E
N
T
A
N
D
/O
R
W
O
R
K
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
P
R
I
V
I
L
E
G
E
.
BY REVISION DATE
A
N
Y
A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T
S
, C
O
P
Y
I
N
G
O
R
D
I
S
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
, I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
C
O
M
P
U
T
E
R
G
E
N
E
R
A
T
E
D
A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T
S
, C
O
P
Y
I
N
G
O
R
D
I
S
T
R
U
B
I
T
I
O
N
I
S
S
T
R
I
C
T
L
Y
P
R
O
H
I
B
I
T
E
D
U
N
L
E
S
S
A
U
T
H
O
R
I
Z
E
D
I
N
W
R
I
T
I
N
G
B
Y
R
U
S
S
E
L
L
T
. H
A
M
M
O
N
D
S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G
L
.L
.C
..
TENTH TAX DISTRICT, WORCESTER COUNTY, MARYLAND
TOWN OF OCEAN CITY
GRADING PLAN
LANDS OF G & A RUSSO & SONS INC.
33RD STREET & COASTAL HIGHWAY
R U S S E L L T. H A M M N D
N/A
R. SAVAGE
R.T.Hammond
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
(410) 352-5674 - (410)726-8076
10310 Hotel Road Bishopville, MD 21813
SURVEYING - LAND PLANNING
, Surveyi ng LLC
N
SURVEYED BY
DATE
SCALE
FILE #
1" = 20'
2/28/2014
2014-0779 R.T.H./R.S.
REMOVE EXISTING VINYL FENCE-5'-0" LANDSCAPED AREA TO BE PROVIDED ALONG COASTAL HIGHWAY-NEW FENCE W/ LANDSCAPING 42" HIGH FENCE FROM TOP OF NEW PATIO
* PROPOSED CONC. H/C RAMP-STAIRS AND AS HATCHED AREA INDICATED CONC. WALKWAY TO EXISTING FRONT DOOR. (ADA ACC. ROUTE)
=
WIDE TWO
WAY DRIVE
23'
EXISTING 1000. GAL.
12' RADIUS
WIDE TWO
WAY DRIVE
(3) 8 YD. TRASH CONT.
8" THICK 4000. PSI
T
R
U
C
K
B
A
C
K
U
P
A
R
E
A
3
9
'-0
" C
L
E
A
R
T
R
A
S
H
(3) 10 X 10 CONC PADS
E
X
I S
T
I N
G
P
A
R
K
I N
G
B
U
M
P
E
R
S
NEW 9 X 20
SPACE
E
X
I S
T
I N
G
P
A
R
K
I N
G
B
U
M
P
E
R
S
NEW 9 X 20
SPACE
10
11
12
(5) NEW SPACES
MUST BE ASPHALT
NEW 9 X 20
SPACE
NEW 9 X 20
SPACE
8
9
7
5
6
E
X
I S
T
I N
G
P
A
R
K
I N
G
B
U
M
P
E
R
S
2
3
4
1
EXIST. 23'
WIDE TWO
WAY DRIVE
E
D
G
E
O
F
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
FFE = 8.0' AS PROPOSED TOP OF PATIO TYP.
TYPICAL PERVIUOS PAVER RAISED PATIO-
NEW SHED ROOF
TILE
123.5'
C
O
N
C
. W
A
L
K
PROP. ROOF LINE
8
. 0
'
PROP. ROOF LINE
A = 278.33'
RIM = 4.25'
EX. CB
23'
HGT. TO MATCH EXISTING 1ST FLOOR
17.6'
2
4
. 5
'
12.5'
PROPOSED
ADDITION
0
20
( IN FEET )
1" = '
20 20 10
ACC. SPACE
8 X 20 VAN 8 X 20 VAN
ACC. SPACE
20'
8
'
NEW 9 X 20
SPACE
20'
8
'
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
9.5'
REVISED PARKING SPACES (HANDICAP LOCATION) 03/25/14 RTH
WALK
P
R
O
P
. G
U
T
T
E
R
PROPOSED
5' x 5' RAIN
GARDEN
EXISTING
EXISTING
4.8'
4.8'
4.1'
4.2'
4.8' 4.3'
4.2'
4.4'
4.3'
4.0'
4.1'
4.8'
4.9'
4.5'
4.4'
4.4'
5.00'
GENERAL NOTES:
PER FIRM NO. 245207 0001 G
DATED FEBRUARY 4, 1988
FLOOD ZONE: A6 (BFE = 6.0')
BFE = 8.0' PER TOWN CODE
SIDES: 5' FOR 1,2 & 3 STORY DWELLINGS
SIDES: 10' FOR 4 & 5 STORY DWELLINGS
MAX BUILDING HEIGHT: 50' OR 5 STORIES
EX. ZONING: LC-1
ZONING SETBACKS:
FRONT: 10'
ADDRESS: 3303 COASTAL HIGHWAY
DEED REF: F.W.H. 743/270
PLAT REF: W.C.L. 109/23
TAX MAP: 112, PARCEL: 4363
LOT AREA: 1.41 ACRES (61,277 SQ. FT. )
PLAT REF: O.D.C. 2/23 & O.D.C. 2/13
REAR: 10' (25' IF AJOINED BY R-1 DISTRICT)
65
47
5.00'
PROPOSED PERVIOUS
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
5
.0
'
23'
WIDE TWO
WAY DRIVE
23.00'
4
5
'
9
'
17.5'
17.5'
9
' 9
'
17.5'
13
66
67
68
69
70
71 72
73
74
75
76
EXISTING
ASPHALT DRIVE
T
R
E
N
C
H
" B
"
T
R
E
N
C
H
" C
"
PROPOSED
ASPHALT
DRIVE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
= 248'46"
T
R
E
N
C
H
" A
"
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
F
IL
T
E
R
A
R
E
A
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
F
IL
T
E
R
A
R
E
A
INV. = 2.1'
INV. = 1.9'
EXISTING 12" CMP
PROP.
2'x 2' CATCH
BASIN
RIM= 4.0'
EXISTING
12" CMP
INV. = 2.3'
5.7' 5.2' 5.2'
5.7'
5.2'
5.2'
5.7'
5.2'
5.2' 5.2' 5.7' 5.2'
5.2'
5.5'
5.7'
5.3'
5.5'
5.5
5.2'
5.2'
5.7'
5.0'
5.0'
5.0'
C
U
R
B
C
U
T
(P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
)
8.0'
7.8'
8.0'
8.0' 7.8'
7.8'
7.8'
4" SPACE IN WALL
FOR OVERFLOW (TYP)
(SEE DETAIL)
(.5)(0.5 + 1) (2)
72.46 SQ.FT. REQUIRED =
Af= (WQV)(Df)
(k) (Hf + Df) (Tf)
108.7 CU.FT.
=
BIORETENTION AREA "A" - 45' x 5' = 225 SQ. FT. PROVIDED
E.S.D.: BIORETENTION AREA "B"
BIORETENTION AREA "B" - 81' x 5' = 405 SQ. FT. PROVIDED
= 260.93 SQ.FT. REQUIRED
E.S.D.: BIORETENTION AREA "C"
BIORETENTION AREA "C" - 63' x 5' = 315 SQ. FT. PROVIDED
= 113 SQ.FT. REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA #6 = 1,305 SQ. FT. OF ASPHALT AREA
1,305 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 108.7 CU. FT. WQV
2,349 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 195.7 CU. FT. WQV
2,349 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 195.7 CU. FT. WQV
=
Af= (WQV)(Df)
(k) (Hf + Df) (Tf)
391.4 CU.FT.
(.5)(0.5 + 1) (2)
2,034 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 169.50 CU. FT. WQV
(.5)(0.5 + 1) (2)
(k) (Hf + Df) (Tf)
=
Af= (WQV)(Df) 169.50 CU.FT.
E.S.D.: BIORETENTION AREA "A"
2,349 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 195.7 CU. FT. WQV
2,034 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 169.50 CU. FT. WQV
DRAINAGE AREA #4 = 2602 SQ. FT. PERVIOUS PAVER PATIO
2602 SQ. FT. x 0.083333 = 216 CU.FT. WQV
DRAINAGE AREA #5 = 421 SQ. FT. ROOFTOP RUNOFF
421 SQ. FT. x 0.083333 = 35.1 CU.FT. WQV
1,305 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 108.7 CU. FT. WQV
2,349 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 195.7 CU. FT. WQV
INV. OF 6"
UNDERDRAIN = 3.2'
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN
DRAINAGE AREA #7 RUNOFF FLOWS TO EXISTING CATCH BASINS
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES:
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (LOD)
PROPOSED ADDITION TO BUILDING = 421 SQ.FT.
PROPOSED PAVER PATIO (PERVIOUS) = 2,602 SQ.FT.
PROPOSED CONCRETE RAMP AND STEP = 212 SQ.FT.
PROPOSED ADDITIONAL ASPHALT PARKING = 12,406 SQ.FT.
PROPOSED DUMPSTER PAD = 133 SQ.FT.
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
F
IL
T
E
R
A
R
E
A
ASPHALT DRIVE
PERVIOUS
TRASH ENCLOSURE
( IN FEET )
1" = '
20 0
20
20 10
DENOTES LARGE TREE
DENOTES GUY WIRE
1929 DATUM
DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT
DENOTES WATER VALVE
DENOTES IRON ROD FOUND
DENOTES UNMARKED POINT
DENOTES POWER POLE
DENOTES WATER METER
DENOTES MAG NAIL FOUND
DENOTES UTILITY PED.
LOW SHADE LIGHT
OVERFLOWDEVICE
EXISTING STREET SIGN
HANDICAPE SPACE
LEGEND
These standard symbols will
be found in the drawing.
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SW - 1.2
DENOTES SILT FENCE AND/OR LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION
DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION
7.5'
DENOTES POST CONSTRUCTION FLOW
4.2'
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT LEGEND
DENOTES LANDSCAPE FILTER AREA
DENOTES PROPOSED DOWN SPOUT LOCATION
DENOTES PROPOSED PERVIOUS ASPHALT
SF
SF
PARKING
4.8'
4.6' 4.6'
4.8' 4.8'
4.6'
3,368 SQ. FT. x 0.95/12 = 266 CU. FT.
5' x 5' RAIN GARDEN = 33 CU. FT. OF WQv (SEE DETAIL SHEET SW1.3)
IMPERVIOUS PATIO = 2,606 SQ. FT.
TREATED BY STONE LANDSCAPE TRENCH
REMOVED 6" PVC FROM LANDSCAPE FILTER , ADDED GRADES TO LANDCAPE FILTER 05/13/2014 RTH
OR UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR UNDER
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND LICENSE NO. 21329, EXPIRATION DATE 1/08/2015.
4" CONCRETE PAD FOR
FIRE DEPT.
FLOOD LIGHT LOCATION
FLOOD LIGHT LOCATION
3' x 53' STONE LANDSCAPE
TRENCH
3' x 38' STONE LANDSCAPE
TRENCH
2
7
.4
'
GREASE TRAP
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
S
L
O
T
D
R
A
I N
ADDED STONE LANDSCAPE TRENCH AND PATIO DRAIN FOR IMPERVIOUS PATIO
07/08/2014 RTH
E.S.D.: BIORETENTION AREA "D"
BIORETENTION AREA "D" - 53' x 3' = 159 SQ. FT. PROVIDED
= 144.4 SQ.FT. REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA #3 = 2,601 SQ. FT. OF PATIO AREA
2,601 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 216.7 CU. FT. WQV
(.5)(0.5 + 1) (2)
(k) (Hf + Df) (Tf)
=
Af= (WQV)(Df) 169.50 CU.FT.
- 38 x 3' = 114 SQ. FT. PROVIDED
TOTAL = 273 SQ. FT. PROVIDED
FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION
(CLEAR 12' OF
VEGETATION)
FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION
(NO LANDSCAPING OR
OBSTRUCTIONS WITHIN 7'6"
EACH SIDE OF CONNECTION)
WOOD TIMBERS
WOOD TIMBERS


5. NEW BUSINESS

G. Request to Approval Purchase of Fire Station Appliances
and Bunk Room Furniture presented by City Engineer

TOWN OF

FROM: Terence J. McGean, PE, City Engineer
RE: Fire Station 4 Furniture and Equipment Purchase

ISSUE(S): Request approval to purchase Fire Station 4 appliances and bunk
room furniture

SUMMARY: Staff is in the process of fitting out Fire Station 4 in preparation for a
September move in date. Two items, appliances and bunk room
furniture, exceed $10,000 and require council approval.

FISCAL IMPACT: $27,024 to be paid from Fire Station 4 project funds

RECOMMENDATION: Award appliance purchase to Eastern Shore Appliance in the amount
of $10,911.91.

Award bunk room furniture purchase to All Aboard, Inc. in the
amount of $16,113.00

Excellent Service through a High Performing Town organization

ALTERNATIVES: None

RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Captain Eric Peterson, Fire Department

COORDINATED WITH: Terence McGean, City Engineer

ATTACHMENT(S): Bid summary

Agenda Item # 5G
FireStation4ApplianceBidSummary
Vendor Amount
EasternShoreAppliance 10,911.91 $
Lowes 11,807.19 $
Sears 11,827.14 $
DelawareAppliance 12,878.00 $
FireStation4BunkRoomFurnitureBidSummary
Vendor Amount
AllABoard,Inc 16,113.00 $
ButlerWoodCrafters 21,809.97 $
*bunkfurnitutreissolidwoodinstitutionalgrade


5. NEW BUSINESS

H. Capital Improvement Plan Update presented by City
Engineer

TOWN OF

FROM: Terence J. McGean, PE, City Engineer
RE: Capital Improvement Plan Update

ISSUE(S): Capital Improvement Plan Update

SUMMARY: Staff has prepared an update to the Capital Improvement Plan

FISCAL IMPACT: The following policies have been adopted by the Mayor and City
Council regarding debt:

1. Total debt as a percentage of assessed value shall not exceed
3%. Current actual is 1.08%.
2. Net General Fund Debt shall not exceed 8% of operating
expenses. Current actual is 6.85%.
3. Ten year debt payout ratio shall not be less than 65%. Current
actual is 77.77%.

RECOMMENDATION: Review submitted draft plan, add or delete projects, change project
priorities or timing as desired and approve.

Financially Sound Town Government

ALTERNATIVES: Send plan back to staff for revisions.

RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Terence McGean, City Engineer

COORDINATED WITH: Martha Bennett, CPA, Finance Director
Hal Adkins, Public Works Director
Susan Petito, Recreation and Parks Director
(Project details also provided to Convention Center Director, Police
Chief, Fire Chief, and Emergency Services Director)

ATTACHMENT(S): 1) Plan summary Power Point
2) Project summary by category
3) Project summary by funding source
4) Project detail report

Agenda Item # 5H
Fire Station 4 Complete by End of August
Fire Headquarters: design approved, begin
construction this winter.
St. Louis Ave: Last phase this winter
Beach Patrol: Begin construction this fall
Convention Center Auditorium: Complete
December
Canal Dredge: First phase to start this fall, 2
nd
phase funded at 50%.
Public Safety Building and Service Center Roof
Replacements: Completed
51
st
Street Production well and well house
completed
Dukes Ave Pump Station Completed
Old Landing Rd Pump Station Completed
Rebuilt two clarigesters at the Wastewater
plant
Paving program (22nd/Herring, 32
nd
st
neighborhood, 33
rd
, 41
st
, and 59
th
st.)
Includes projects identified by staff to start
within the next 5 years.
For inclusion in the CIP, projects should:
Have a relatively high monetary value
Have a long life
Result in the creation of an asset or the
revitalization of an asset.
In general Capital Improvement Projects
include the following:
Construction of new Town facilities
Remodeling or expansion of existing Town facilities
Purchase and development of land
Operating equipment and machinery for new or
expanded facilities
Street construction, reconstruction & resurfacing
Planning and design costs related to specific Capital
Projects.
Department Categories
Public Safety
General Public Works
Municipal Complex
Highways and Streets
Recreation & Parks
Environmental
Technology & Communication (new)
Convention Center
Airport
Water
Wastewater
Debt funding
Bond Finance: General Fund supported
Bond Finance: OCCC Food Tax supported
Bond Finance: User Fee supported
Bond Finance: Wastewater Fees supported
Bond Finance: Water Fees supported
Capital Equipment Lease
State Loans
Pay As You Go and other funding sources
Federal Grants
State Grants
General Fund
Prior project balance (for projects shown in the CIP
that are already funded)
User Fees (stormwater)
Vehicle & Equipment Trust Fund
Wastewater Fund
Water Fund
Unfunded in current year (new)
No new bond projects for fy15
Eagles landing Irrigation System: County
Funds
Skate Park and Downtown Recreation
Complex: Coordination with St. Louis Ave
work, cost figures updated.
Unfunded projects: Utility undergrounding in
Little Salisbury, Network backup systems
Street Improvements/Stormwater:
Coordination of funding remains a concern
Whiteside Building Replacement - 17
City wide security upgrades - 16
Council chambers A/V upgrades - 16
Equipment replacement at PSB 17/18
Life Saving Museum elevator and stairs -17
1
st
Street Water Tank 16/17
Chicago Ave Bulkhead Repairs - 19
Relocation of DPW Yard 17+
$9.3
$23.4
$6.8
$4.8
$11.2
$10.6
$10.5
$39.6
Facilities
Highways and Streets
Recreation and Parks
Environment/Canals
Communication
Convention Center
Airport
Water and
Wastewater
$16.2
$22.0
$32.2
$10.7
$14.7
$2.5
$2.9
$13.9
FY15-19
GF Bond
GF PAYGO/User
Fees
Other Bond*
Lease/Trust Fund
Federal & State
Grants
Prior Balance
Unfunded current
year
Water/WW PAYGO
* Includes wastewater & water bonds
$16.2
$5.0
$1.7
$1.2
$4.3
$20.0
Fy 15-19
General Fund
Food Tax
User Fee
County
Water Fee
Wastewater Fee
Total debt as a percentage of assessed Value
Policy= 3% Maximum
Current actual = 1.08%
Net debt service (general fund debt) as a
percentage of general fund expenditures
Policy = 8% Maximum
Debt 10 year payout ratio
Policy = 65% minimum
Prepared by Martha Bennett, Finance Director
Capital Improvement Plan
Town of Ocean City, Maryland
Department 1 Public Safety
2015 2019 thru
Contact Terence McGean
Description
Construction of a new Fire Station to be located in the front parking lot of the Public Safety Building Complex located at 65th Street Bayside.
Project # 08-PS-05
Priority 3 Important
Justification
This is the final phase of the improvements recommended in the 2002 Fire Station Location Study. Replacement of Station 4 and renovations and
additions to Fire Headquarters were phases 1 & 2 respectively completed in FY 14 and FY 15. This new Mid-Town Station would replace Station
3 currently located at 74th Street. Station 3 is located on a small lot with no room for expansion.
Useful Life 40 Years
Project Name Mid-Town Fire Station
Category Buildings
Type Improvement
Total Project Cost: $6,000,000
City Project Code
Total 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Expenditures
600,000 600,000 Planning/Design
5,400,000 5,400,000 Construction/Maintenance
600,000 5,400,000 6,000,000
Total
Total 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Funding Sources
6,000,000 6,000,000 Bond Financing - General Fund
6,000,000 6,000,000
Total
Town of Ocean City Capital Improvement Plan
2015 2019 thru
Description
Replacement of the 500 kw generator at the public safety building.
Project # 15-PS-001
Justification
This generator was installed in 1992. It is critical for the operation of the building in the event of a power loss.
Project Name Public Safety Building Generator Replacement
Category Equipment - PW
Type Equipment
Total Project Cost: $150,000
City Project Code
150,000 150,000 Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
150,000 150,000
Total
150,000 150,000 General Fund
150,000 150,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Replacemet of the chillers and cooling tower at the Public Safety Building. Chillers 100 ton 2 each, Cooling tower stainless steel 100 ton 2 each
Project # 15-PS-002
Justification
This equipment was installed in 1992 and should not be expected to last beyond 25 years. Some energy savings should be anticiapted based on the
increased effeciency of the new equipment.
Project Name Public Safety Building Chillers and Cooling Tower
Category Buildings
Type Equipment
City Project Code
10,000 290,000 300,000
Total
300,000 300,000 General Fund
300,000 300,000
Total
Department 3 General Public Works
2015 2019 thru
Contact Hal Adkins
Description
Replacement of the existing Public Works tram and tractor storage facility located at Philadelphia Ave and South 1st Street, known as the
Whiteside Facility. Facility may be rebuilt at existing location or relocated, TBD
Project # 15-HS-002
Justification
The existing pre-fabricated metal building at the Whiteside public works facity was constructed in 1977 and requires replacement. The building
skin is rusted completely through in areas and the strucural frame is badly coorded and has been patch welded a number of times.
Project Name Replacement of Whiteside Facility
Category Buildings
Type Improvement
City Project Code
800,000 800,000 Construction/Maintenance
40,000 800,000 840,000
Total
840,000 840,000 Bond Financing - General Fund
840,000 840,000
Total
Department 3 General Public Works
2015 2019 thru
Description
Improvements to City facilities for the purpose of increasing security. Improvments may include reception area modifications at City Hall, PSB and
Recreation and parks, modifications to the council executive conferecne room, modifications to the city hall reception area, modifications to the
PSB lobby area, installation of panic buttons at various locations, additional surveillance cameras and possible installation of metal detectors. Note
that cost estimate is very conceptual pending completion of a security analysis.
Project # 15-HS-003
Priority 2 Very Important
Justification
Secuirty of the employees, elected officials and visitors to City facilities.
Project Name City Wide Security Improvements
Category Buildings
Type Improvement
City Project Code
150,000 75,000 75,000 Construction/Maintenance
10,000 5,000 5,000 Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
80,000 80,000 160,000
Total
160,000 80,000 80,000 General Fund
80,000 80,000 160,000
Total
Department 31 Municipal Complex Expan
2015 2019 thru
Contact Hal Adkins
Description
Modification to the entire eastern portion of the Department Of Public Works Complex inclusive of construction activities on the northern portion
of the gravel lot recently purchased from the Laws Family, modifications to 65th Street itself inclusive of moving the gated entrance to align with
the south wall of PSB, modifications to the Fuel Depot, reconstruction/relocation-shifting of the Fuel Depot, reconstruction/relocation of the Stock
Room and Purchasing Department, construction of a bus storage facility, and repurposing of the Bus Barn via re-skinning etc.
Project # 07-TR-001
Justification
The Town, working with the MTA , recently completed a $100,000 Campus Plan. The purpose of the plan was to address a Needs Assessment
specific to the growth of the Transporation Department since 1983 and the overall inadequacy of the facilities for that department. As a result of
the Needs Assessment and Campus Plan, a series of Capital Improvements have been identified that will not only address the Transportation
Department growth since 1983 but will also address modification and reconfiguration of other facilities to address staff parking needs, overall
traffic flow and fueling capabilities, and addresses relocation of Administrative Offices from the central core of the Complex by shifting them to
the front of the Complex thus setting the stage for the land mass needed for future Wastewater Process Enhancements
Project Name Municipal Facility - 65th St Public Works Complex
Category Buildings
Type Improvement
City Project Code
1,800,000 1,800,000 Planning/Design
1,800,000 1,800,000
Total
600,000 600,000 General Fund
1,200,000 1,200,000 State Grants
1,800,000 1,800,000
Total
Department 31 Municipal Complex Expan
2015 2019 thru
Contact Hal Adkins
Description
Relocation of the current facilities and functions located at our Keyser Point Yard site to an alternative site and disposal, via sale, of the current
property. Location and associated cost to be determined.
Project # 15-HS-001
Justification
The current facility has been in use since the 1960s. As the years have passed not only has the Town outgrown the current facility but residential
development has now surrounded our property. We are basically operating a municipal/industrial type operation in the middle of a residential
neighborhood at all hours of the day/night and weekends. The few structures that reside on the property have reached the end of their useful life
and it is time to either invest in improvements to the overall site OR relocate. It is my preference to move. Site enhancements to the Keyser Point
Road site that will make it far more marketable.
Project Name Relocation of DPW Yard
Category Land acquisition & improvem
Type Improvement
Total Project Cost: $0
City Project Code
0 0 Planning/Design
0 0 Land Acquisition
0 0 Construction/Maintenance
0 0 0
Total
0 0 General Fund
0 0 Property Sale
0 0 0
Total
Department 32 Highways and Streets
2015 2019 thru
Description
Replace gravel in existing landscape strips on 94th street with brick pavers.
Project # 08-HS-002
Priority 4 Less Important
Justification
The landscape strips on the east half of 94th Street were originally designed to be sodded. Due to concerns from the recreation and parks
department that grass would not grow in these areas because they were too narrow, decorative stone was substituted. This has also proven to be a
maintenance problem due to weeds and stone blowing into the street.
Project Name 94th Street Landscape Strips
Category Street Construction
Type Improvement
City Project Code
60,000 60,000
Total
60,000 60,000 General Fund
60,000 60,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
In the early 90s, the City installed landscaped medians on the wider streets north of 142nd in an effort to narrow the travel ways. The proposed
project, would extend this concept south of 142nd street, but use landscape strips on the north and south sides of the streets in place of the median.
This will reduce vehicle speeds and provide a wider, more pedestrian friendly route.
Project # 08-HS-003
Justification
Caine Woods is a large residential neighborhood on the bayside between 136th and 146th Streets. When originally constructed, 5 sidewalks were
installed on each side of the platted right-of-way and the rest of the street width was paved using thin thickness of asphalt. Because many of the
streets have a right-of-way in excess of 50 feet wide, paved widths are too wide for a residential collector street. This has caused excessive
speeding and traffic volumes within the neighborhood.
Project Name Caine Woods Street Improvements
Type Improvement
City Project Code
2,400,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Construction/Maintenance
600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 2,400,000
Total
2,400,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 General Fund
600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 2,400,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Hal Adkins
Description
Funding for conversation of overhead utilities (Power, Phone, and Cable Television) to underground.
Note that paving in Little Salisbury is scheudled for this year however NO funds for undergrounding utilites were appropriated in the FY 15 Budget
Project # 08-HS-006
Justification
Dating back to 1991, the Town of Ocean City has taken efforts to place all overhead utilities underground, when financially feasible, as part of the
overall annual Street Improvement Program. At this point in time, the MCC have funded between 2 and 3 million dollars annually for street
improvements. This street improvement funding is currently covering the costs of storm drain upgrades, sidewalk replacement (where needed),
concrete rubble disposal fees, hot mix, and all associated labor that is attributable to these efforts. As a side note: any water and wastewater
improvements are funded separately. That funding scenario leaves the concept of undergrounding overhead utilities as unfunded. Historically the
Town set aside an annual amount of funding in anticipation of such efforts. That annual set aside was discontinued a few years ago. Now that
we are finally able to invest in paving efforts, the topic of overall utility conversion will become an annual issue. When looking at the next few
years worth of street selections for paving, the issue of 87th to 94th Street bayside comes to mind. Known as Little Salisbury, that area is
currently slated for repaving in the Fall of 2014 and Spring of 2015 IF the annual Street Improvement Program allocation of $3,000,000 is
provided. The majority of this neighborhool currently has overhead utilities and would be ideal for placement underground. Based on current cost
estimates, the underground infrastructure (the skeleton) would cost roughly $2,715,000 and the conversion (the cabling and equipment) would cost
roughly and additional $2,432,000.
Project Name Undergrounding of Utilities
Type Improvement
City Project Code UNDRGR
5,147,000 2,715,000 2,432,000 0 0 Construction/Maintenance
2,715,000 2,432,000 0 0 5,147,000
Total
2,432,000 2,432,000 0 0 General Fund
2,715,000 2,715,000 Not funded current year !
2,715,000 2,432,000 0 0 5,147,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Hal Adkins
Description
Annual allocation for Street Improvement Program
Project # 08-HS-010
Priority 1 Critical
Justification
Based on the most recent update of the Street Inventory Pavement Condition Report, updated in June 2013, the Town currently faces roughly
36.7 million dollars in pavement issues IF all streets were brought up to acceptable status simultaneously. Clearly that is not feasible but we must
be proactive in our efforts to continue with an annual effort OR we will face further surface failures that will negate our ability to overlay an
existing surface. With that in mind, and based on a review of the overall inventory, it is our request that $3,000,000 be allocated annually for a
Street Improvement Program. At this time the use of that annual funding is directly attributable to the following work efforts: sidewalk
replacement (where needed), concrete rubble disposal fees, hot mix, and all associated labor that is attributable to these efforts. Storm drain
upgrades and replacements may be paid by storm water utility user fees as shown below. As a side note: Any water or wastewater improvements
are funded separately AND the annual Street Improvement Funding does NOT account for any undergrounding of overhead utilities.
Project Name Street Improvements & Overlays
Type Maintenance
City Project Code STPAV
12,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 Construction/Maintenance
2,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 12,000,000
Total
9,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 General Fund
3,000,000 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 User fees
2,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 12,000,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Hal Adkins
Description
Demolition of roadway. Upgrade of water, sewer, storm drains. Undergrounding of utilities and streetscaping.
Project # 09-HS-002
Justification
Portion of St. Louis Ave from N. Division Street to 17th Street is in severe state of decay. The entire roadway system needs to be demolished and
reconstructed. This would also be a possbile catalyst for redevelopment on this thorroughfare.
Project Name St. Louis Ave Improvements
Type Improvement
City Project Code
1,731,000 1,731,000
Total
1,731,000 1,731,000 Prior project balance
1,731,000 1,731,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Hal Adkins
Description
Dedication of a transit lane on Philadelphia Ave from 17th Street to Worcester Street. Partial demolition and reconfiguring of center islands,
removal of parking on wester side of road, sidewalk and curbing modifications, new overhead mast poles and signs, and road resurfacing.
Project # 09-HS-012
Justification
Transit lane on Coastal Highway ends at 17th Street. From there south, buses are forced to comingle with general traffic circulation.
Project Name Philadelphia Ave Transit Lane
Type Improvement
City Project Code
400,000 1,600,000 2,000,000
Total
0 0 Federal Grants
0 2,000,000 2,000,000
Total
Department 4 Recreation and Parks
2015 2019 thru
Description
The City has identified an existing street with a 75 right-of-way located between Philadelphia Ave and the bay in Downtown Ocean City for
conversion to a pedestrian oriented park. The street will be closed to unauthorized vehicles, and completely re-developed using environmentally
friendly materials and natural landscaping. Phase 1 of the park included scenic walkways, restroom facilities, stage area, bay overlook was
completed in 2006. The park also included a boardwalk with informational kiosks to educate visitors about the type and value of the natural
resources in and around the City. Phase 2 of the park includes construction of a pier for tall ships, water taxis and other vessels
Project # 08-RP-001
Justification
As Ocean City has grown, particularly the level of residential development that has occurred in recent years, the need for public parks and water
access has increased. The recent visits by the Galleon have shown the popularity of tall ships as an attraction in Ocean City however many ships,
including the "Pride of Baltimore" are unable to reach the 3rd street park docking location due to shallow water north of the Coast Guard basin.
Project Name Sunset Park - Phase 2 - Pier
Category Park Improvements
Type Improvement
City Project Code
500,000 500,000
Total
500,000 500,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Tom Shuster
Description
Renovation of existing Ocean Bowl Skate Park and expansion of new skate park facilities in the 3rd Street area based on designs developed by the
skate park design consultant in FY 2006/2007.
Project # 08-RP-006
Justification
The Town has retained a design consultant in FY2006/2007 to develop a new design and cost estimate for the renovation and expansion of the
skate park located at 3rd Street and St. Louis Avenue. The skate park was last re-built in 1998. The design firm of Wally Hollyday Design has
been contracted by the Town to prepare plans for a 17,000 square foot expansion with additional equipment and furnishings. The skate park is a
customer supported recreation amenity with revenue generated from admission fees.
Project Name Skate Park Renovations & Expansion
Type Improvement
City Project Code
820,334 820,334
Total
820,334 820,334
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Tom Shuster
Description
Renovation of the Downtown Recreation Complex with improvements recommended by Master Plan Consultant and modified to inlcude a pcinic
pavillion, comfort station and swapping the backetball court and tennis court locations. This project would be completed in conjucntion with the
skate park expansion project.
Project # 08-RP-008
Justification
The Town retained a planning consultant in FY 2006/2007 to develop a new master plan for the Downtown Recreation Complex from Philadelphia
Avenue to Chicago Avenue between 3rd Street and Fourth Street. Construction documents have been completed that divide the improvements into
two phases of re-development and improvements beginning with the 3rd Street area around the skate park. The second phase will focus on
improvement to the block between St. Louis Avenue and the Chicago Avenue boardwalk. Both phases may be built concurrently to save
construction costs and coordinated with St. Louis Ave improvements. The completed project will be known as Bayside Park.
Project Name Downtown Recreation Complex Improvements
Type Improvement
City Project Code
3,375,000 1,375,000 2,000,000 Construction/Maintenance
140,000 1,375,000 2,000,000 3,515,000
Total
3,515,000 3,515,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Tom Shuster
Description
The existing lights at the soccer field (s) at Northside Park are in need of replacement with a more energy efficient light system.
Project # 09-RP-003
Justification
The existing soccer field lights are not as energy efficient and safe for play because of their age and style. A new light system would be safer and
more cost efficient.
Project Name NSP - Soccer Field Light Renovation
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
100,000 100,000
Total
100,000 100,000 State Loan
100,000 100,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Tom Shuster
Description
The expansion of the existing Parks Division maintenance/storage building in Northside Park to accommodate vehicle, equipment and supplies
storage.
Project # 11-RP-002
Justification
The existing Parks Division maintenance building is reaching capacity and will be in need of expansion to accommodate growth in vehicles and
equipment. A design consultant will need to be retained to plan the expansion prior to construction.
Project Name Parks Garage Storage Expan Design/Construction
Category Buildings
Type Improvement
City Project Code
15,000 15,000
Total
290,000 15,000 275,000 General Fund
15,000 275,000 290,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Tom Shuster
Description
Regrade and reshape landscape west of the Parks Maintenance yard and north of the pathway in Northside Park to re-direct and improve storm
water drainage and enhance area for public access.
Project # 12-RP-001
Justification
The existing swale system north of the pathway and west of the Parks Maintenance yard is inefficient in handling storm water management and the
current swale configuration blocks public access and impedes expansion of Parks Maintenance yard.
Project Name NSP - Bio-Retention Improvements: North Boundary
Type Improvement
City Project Code
180,000 180,000
Total
180,000 180,000 General Fund
180,000 180,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Tom Shuster
Description
Asphalt overlay of Community Center parking lot at NSP at 125th Street. Overlay and drainage improvements to parking lot at Jamaica Ave
Project # 12-RP-003
Justification
The current lot is over 25 years old and in need of resurfacing. Imrpovements will improve safety and enhance use of lot when substantial vehicle
and pedestrian traffic is in parking lot. Jamaica Ave lot stormwater drainage configuration causes problems during Winterfest
Project Name NSP Parking Lot Repairs and Improvements
Type Improvement
City Project Code
95,000 60,000 155,000
Total
155,000 155,000 General Fund
155,000 155,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Tom Shuster
Description
Replacement or improvements of existing playgrounds at Dowtown Bayside, $85,000; Northside Park, $95,000; and Little Salisbury, $85,000.
Project # 14-RP-006
Justification
Current wood fiber safety surfacing at parks need to be replaced with a more compliant surfacing that meets ASTM standards for fall protection
and impact attenuation, eixsting equipment is reaching end of life.
Project Name Playground Replacements
Type Improvement
City Project Code
265,000 85,000 95,000 85,000 Construction/Maintenance
85,000 95,000 85,000 265,000
Total
265,000 85,000 95,000 85,000 State Grants
85,000 95,000 85,000 265,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Tom Shuster
Description
This project involves the replacement of all components of the golf course irrigation system at Eagles Landing Golf Course, except the pump
station which was replaced in 2012. This includes design and consultation services, materials, installation and warranty of pipe, valves, wire,
sprinkler heads, field satellite controllers, radio components, central control and computers. This would also include improvements to pond
aerators and wiring on course potable water supply, irrigation water holding pond improvements and some drainage and aesthetic improvements
related to the installation of the irrigation system
Project # 15-RP-001
Priority 1 Critical
Justification
When the golf course was designed and bid out in 1988 it was a very basic low bid, low cost project. The irrigation system, as part of the project,
followed that model. The irrigation system was installed in 1989 and has been plagued by problems since the beginning. Those problems have
continued for the past 25 years. In an effort to keep the turfgrass healthy, the golf course staff has made many improvements over the years, adding
sprinkler heads, improving controls and replacing the pump station. Those piecemeal improvements have reached their useful service life. In 2002,
the Town contracted Irrigation Consulting Inc. to audit and evaluate the irrigation system. They concluded that the system. may not be able to
meet the expectation of the players and at the same time withstand the amount of play the course is getting and added the irrigation systems
ability to provide conditions required by todays golfers is at its limit. That was 12 years ago. In addition to improved playing conditions from a
modern state of the art irrigation system, the golf course will benefit from improved energy use, greatly reduced operation and maintenance costs,
improved golf course aesthetics and customer service upgrades.
Project Name Eagles Landing Irrigation System
Type Improvement
City Project Code
1,200,000 1,200,000
Total
1,200,000 1,200,000 Bond Financing - User fee
supported
1,200,000 1,200,000
Total
Department 51 Environmental
2015 2019 thru
Description
This project consists of an on going program to maintenance dredge Canals within the city limits of Ocean City to an average depth of 4' below
mean low water. The project would dredge approximately 6,000 cubic yards of material per year from canals. The priority for canal dredging will
be determined based on average existing depths as shown on surveys performed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources in 2005 and
2006.
Project # 08-EV-001
Justification
Historically maintaining a navigable depth within the Ocean City canal system was left to the property owners along the canal through a process
outlined in the City code. The combination of a complex State and Federal dredging permit combined with the high cost of dredging has left the
canal system in increasingly poor condition. This project would shift the burden of canal maintenance from the property owner to the City. The
State Department of Natural Resources has collected survey data for the depths of all Ocean City canals. This data was then used to formulate an
annual dredging program, prioritize dredging needs, and establish a regular canal maintenance program administered by the City.
Useful Life On Going
Project Name Canal Dredging
Category Waterways
Type Improvement
City Project Code
1,850,000 250,000 500,000 500,000 600,000 Construction/Maintenance
250,000 500,000 500,000 600,000 1,850,000
Total
1,850,000 250,000 500,000 600,000 500,000 General Fund
250,000 500,000 600,000 500,000 1,850,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
The proposed project would construct a new double lane boat ramp in conjunction with Department of Natural Resouces dedging of lagoon at 64th
Street. Replace boat ramp on Chesapeake Drive with ramp centrally located in Ocean City.
Project # 11-MC-009
Priority 1 Critical
Justification
Numerous citizen complaints of location of current boat ramp due to lack of parking and bathroom facilities.
Project Name Boat ramp at 64th Street
Type Improvement
City Project Code
750,000 750,000
Total
750,000 750,000 Prior project balance
750,000 750,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Dean Dashield
Description
Replacement of 475 linear feet of timber bulkhead protecting the north shoreline of the Public Works Complex with new vinyl bulkhead.
Project # 14-EV-002
Justification
The existing bulkhead is failing due to wood rot.
Project Name Public Works Yard Bulkhead
Category Infrastructure Maintenance
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
175,000 175,000
Total
175,000 175,000 General Fund
175,000 175,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Repair or replacement of steel bulkhead along Chicago Ave from 2nd to 4th street
Project # 14-EV-003
Justification
Existing bulkhead is beginning to corrode
Project Name Chicago Ave Bulkhead
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
2,000,000 2,000,000
Total
2,000,000 2,000,000
Total
Department 52Technology & Communicat
2015 2019 thru
Description
Replacement of the City Government Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) phone system.
Justification:
Project # TC-14-001
Justification
Current system was installed in 2004 and will reach the end of its support life from the vendor in Calendar year 2014. The system must then either
be upgraded or replaced. Staff will be evaluating alternatives.
Project Name VOIP Phone System/Network
Type Equipment
City Project Code
500,000 500,000
Total
500,000 500,000 Capital Equipment Lease
500,000 500,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Contact Joe Theobald
Description
Replace the existing 800 MHz trunked radio city radio system.
Project # TC-14-002
Priority 1 Critical
Justification
Existing radio system was installed in 1993 and, although upgraded over the years, is now reaching end of life. New radio systems allow
simultaneous communication and better interagency coordination.
Project Name 800 MHz Radio System
Type Equipment
City Project Code
9,000,000 9,000,000 Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings
500,000 9,000,000 9,500,000
Total
9,000,000 9,000,000 Capital Equipment Lease
500,000 500,000 Vehicle & Equipment Fund
500,000 9,000,000 9,500,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Upgrade to the existing network backbone with either leased fiber optic lines or new wireless system
Project # TC-15-003
Justification
Vouice and data communications to all City sites is currently carried over a four site wireless radio system which has reached the end of it's useful
life. The prlifieration of new devices requiring netowrk support including high resolution video surveillance requires increased bandwidth.
Project Name Network communications replacement
Type Equipment
City Project Code
5,000 565,000 570,000
Total
565,000 565,000 Capital Equipment Lease
5,000 565,000 570,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Citrix netscaler gateway equipment for remote network access
Project # TC-15-004
Justification
The City has usccessfully implemented virtual desktops to replace PC's, the network scaler gateway will allow the delivery of network applications
to remote users through laptops, tablets or other hand held devices.
Useful Life 5-7 Years
Project Name Netscaler Gateway
Type Equipment
City Project Code
105,000 105,000
Total
105,000 105,000 Not funded current year !
105,000 105,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Provide offsite duplicate storage area network and server replication for proper continuity of operation and disaster recovery. This would be done
either interanally or through a third party vendor.
Project # TC15-005
Priority 1 Critical
Justification
Currently all network servers and storage are located in the Public Safety Building. Although storage files are routinely backed up on tape, these
backups take several hours, reduce network speeds and have proven to be unreliable. The network server infrastrucure currently replicates between
machines on site. This works well provided that the server room remians in tact. Should the server room or public safety builidng be compromised,
there is no back up system and the City would be without any network services.
Project Name Offsite Network Disaster Recovery
Category Unassigned
Type Unassigned
City Project Code
350,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Other
110,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 410,000
Total
400,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 General Fund
110,000 110,000 Not funded current year !
110,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 510,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Replacements and upgrades to the Council Chambers audio visual presentation and recording systems.
Project # TC-15-006
Justification
Many of the components in the existing Council Chambers audio visuoal system are over 15 years old and are starting to fail. Certain new
technologies are not supported by the current system.
Project Name Council Chambers Audio/Visual Upgrade
Category Unassigned
Type Equipment
City Project Code
5,000 130,000 135,000
Total
25,000 25,000 Corporate Grant
110,000 110,000 General Fund
25,000 110,000 135,000
Total
Department 6 Convention Center
2015 2019 thru
Description
Construction of a 30,000 square foot addition to the existing main Exhibit Hall A/B.
Project # 14-CC-003
Justification
Existing and future events are anticipated to need additional exhibit space in the Convention Center to accommodate growth.
Project Name Convention Center Hall A-B Expansion
Category Buildings
Type Improvement
City Project Code
100,000 10,000,000 10,100,000
Total
5,000,000 5,000,000 Bond Financing - OCCC Food
Tax
100,000 100,000 General Fund
5,000,000 5,000,000 State Grants
100,000 10,000,000 10,100,000
Total
Department 6 Convention Center
2015 2019 thru
Description
Construction of an elevator and code compliant exit stairs at the Life Saving Museum
Project # 15-CC-001
Justification
Currently the only access to the second floor of the Life Saving Museum is via a steep narrow stair case. These stairs would not meet current code
requirements and there is no second means of egress. There is no access to the second floor for the disabled. Disabled visitors for the museum can
see second floor exhibits via a video tape monitor only.
Project Name Life Saving Museum Elevator and Exit Stairs
Category Buildings
Type Improvement
City Project Code
80,000 420,000 500,000
Total
500,000 500,000
Total
Department 7 Airport
2015 2019 thru
Contact Jamie Giandomenico
Description
This project will consist of a comprehensive survey, analysis and design for the removal of obstructions at Ocean City Municipal Airport that
exceed FAA obstruction standards. This effort will be focused primarily on the West and South sections of Airport Property, but will include as
many problem areas as is feasible given the project duration and budget. This effort will include the replanting of FAA approved slow/non-
growing plant material in selected areas.
Project # 14-AI-002
Justification
Removal of on-airport obstructions is a safety of flight issue, which if left uncompleted may expose the Town of Ocean City to additional liability.
Failure to remove obstructions in accordance with 14 CFR Part 77 will also jeopardize the Airports future eligibility for additional Federal funding.
Project Name Runway 02/20 7 14/32 Obstruction Removal
Category Airport
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
170,000 600,000 770,000
Total
692,518 152,518 540,000 Federal Grants
38,473 8,473 30,000 General Fund
38,473 8,473 30,000 State Grants
169,464 600,000 769,464
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
This project will replace taxiway A, which has reached the end of its service life despite expensive and continuous maintenance attention. The
existing taxiway will be demolished, and a new one constructed approximately 60 north of its current location. The new location will satisfy the
FAA design guide requirements for taxiway/runway separation. Included in this effort will be lighting upgrades, and minor changes in geometry to
meet current FAA standards.
The design of taxiway A will include the expansion of the adjacent parking ramp to reclaim capacity in the form of parking spaces, which were
deleted to meet taxi lane requirements in the course of the final ALP preparation. While concurrent design was possible and economical, it will be
constructed separately.
Project # 14-AI-004
Justification
Taxiway pavement will not be economical to maintain past the near future. Irrespective of pavement condition, failure to relocate Taxiway A to
meet FAA standards will jeopardize the Airports future funding eligibility. As aircraft are extremely sensitive to foreign object damage, the further
deterioration of the pavement surface may expose the Town of Ocean City to additional liability if aircraft sustain damage from debris or roughness
associated with the failing pavement.
Project Name Taxiway A Relocation
Category Airport
Type Improvement
City Project Code
700,000 3,620,000 4,320,000
Total
3,888,000 630,000 3,258,000 Federal Grants
216,000 35,000 181,000 General Fund
216,000 35,000 181,000 State Grants
700,000 3,620,000 4,320,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Rehabilitate RWY 14/32 will overlay/ repave runway 14/32 east of the 02/20 intersection. This project will include lighting and electrical
upgrades; underground wiring vaults, signage and replacement of Runway 14/32 Visual Approach Slope Indicators with Pulse Light Approach
Slope Indicators. Runway End Identifier Lights and basic approach lighting will also be included. The runway surface will be FAA P-401 likely
placed in two 2 lifts. A grooved primary surface for improved braking is included in the project
Project # 14-AI-005
Justification
Runway 14/32 pavement surface and pavement section has reached the end of its service life. Maintaining the pavement and lighting systems is
uneconomical in all but the short term. Failure to overlay/ rehab Runway 14/32 will result in the downgrading of the runway surface by the FAA
and MAA, which will result in aircraft avoiding the airport in favor of local facilities with better pavements. Aircraft are sensitive to foreign object
damage. The Town of Ocean City may be exposed to additional liability should the pavement be allowed to deteriorate to a point in which surface
debris damages aircraft.
Project Name Rehabilitate Runway 14/32
Category Airport
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
550,000 550,000
Total
495,000 495,000 Federal Grants
27,500 27,500 State Grants
550,000 550,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
This project will construct an additional 3-bay clear span airplane hangar at the Ocean City Municipal Airport. Location of this hangar has been
approved on the Airports recent Master-plan Update. This project will include the construction of a stub taxiway to connect the West ramp with
taxiway A. Location for the building is at the extreme west end of the main ramp. It is designed to accommodate aircraft up to 50 wingspan.
Project # 15-AI-001
Justification
Ocean City Municipal Airport currently has a waiting list with enough names to virtually guarantee 100% occupancy of the above hangars several
times over. Aircraft that cannot be accommodated at Ocean City Airport will use services and facilities at other local airports with a commensurate
loss of revenue.
Project Name Hangar K
Category Airport
Type Improvement
City Project Code
850,000 850,000
Total
850,000 850,000 Bond Financing - User fee
supported
850,000 850,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Ocean City Municipal Airport is currently served by several wells, all with very poor quality water. The airport sewer is served via septic tanks and
a doesed mound system which limits growth at the airport and will soon need equipment replacement and potential construction of a new field.
This project will connect the Airport terminal and tenant hangars to a public water & sewer infrastructure currently located adjacent to Airport
Road. A water main connection near the location of the Lions Club would continue down Airport Road and intercept the connections for the
entire Airport. Bulk of project cost would be in the placement and connection of underground water & sewer lines. Abandonment of existing wells
and septci field in accordance local regulations is included in this project.
Project # 16-AI-001
Justification
Connection to a public water & sewer system will allow the airport to realize a broad range of benefits. It will dramatically reduce the amount of
staff time, material, and maintenance required of the six bathrooms on the airfield. The above public water connection will allow for the removal
of the failing water treatment system. Public sewer connection will allow for abandonement of the existing septic field, and pump equipment which
is nearing the end of it's useful life. In order to supply the terminal with sufficient water pressure to run a sprinkler system, a 10,000-gallon water
tank is located inside the building. With a public water connection, this tank can be removed, freeing space for commercial tenants and reducing
the cost of contract maintenance on high volume sprinkler pumps.
Project Name Airport Water & Sewer Connection
Category Airport
Type Improvement
City Project Code
120,000 120,000
Total
120,000 120,000 General Fund
120,000 120,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
This project will construct a combination aircraft hangar and commercial office space building on the currently underutilized long term parking
lot. Included in this project is the relocation of one section of perimeter fence. This unique building will take advantage of Airport Road frontage
and air-side ramp access, and will be a premium commercial location for on-airport businesses.
Project # 16-AI-002
Justification
With the construction of hangar K (2015) the Airport will have occupied all of the available space with airside (ramp) access. No additional
space with access to the north ramp is available for development. The area currently designated long term parking west is historically
underutilized, and is large enough for the construction of a combination Group I hangar/commercial bldg, currently there is a waiting list for
commercial space on the airport, including terminal access. Given the waiting list for commercial space, 100% occupancy is virtually assured.
Project Name Hangar & Commercial Office Building
Category Airport
Type Improvement
City Project Code
850,000 850,000
Total
850,000 850,000 Bond Financing - User fee
supported
850,000 850,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
This project will construct extensions to the South edge of the North Terminal Ramp from stub Taxiway Alpha west to Taxiway Delta. These
extensions will project south into the main Taxiway Alpha infield area. This project includes repainting taxi lines, and aircraft parking markings.
Also included is installation of tie down anchors for approx. 20 aircraft parking spaces. The design for this project will be completed concurrently
with the Relocate Taxiway A effort (2017) and the cost of design is inlcded under that project, for economy purposes. Per FAA programming,
this project is for construction costs only.
Project # 17-AI-001
Justification
During the final stages of the design of the current Master Plan (2012), the taxi-lanes on the North Terminal Ramp area were redesigned to
accommodate larger Group II aircraft (an FAA requirement). In order to provide adequate clearance for the above taxi-lanes, a large number of
existing aircraft parking spaces will be eliminated. By extending the existing North Ramp boundary 10-20 south, the majority of the eliminated
parking spaces will be restored. Without these parking spaces, the Airport will be unable to accommodate peak seasonal parking requirements.
Project Name Apron Expansion
Type Improvement
City Project Code
1,700,000 1,700,000
Total
1,530,000 1,530,000 Federal Grants
85,000 85,000 State Grants
1,700,000 1,700,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Localizer antenna array for the LOC14 instrument apoproach does not meet current seperation standards for the approach end of runway 32. This
project will consist of design and installation of the localizer array at a location to be determined. An RF study is currently underway (grant
funded) to examine potential relocation sites with a decision to be rendered in 2014
Project # 17-AI-002
Justification
The localizer must be moved to meet FAA design guide seperation Values. If the antenna is left in its current location, runway 14 would have to be
shortened by approximately 350'. This reduction in length would devestate the airport's ability to serve larger aricraft in the group II category with
commensurate economic loss.
Project Name Localizer Relocation
Category Unassigned
Type Improvement
City Project Code
500,000 800,000 1,300,000
Total
1,170,000 450,000 720,000 Federal Grants
65,000 25,000 40,000 General Fund
65,000 25,000 40,000 State Grants
500,000 800,000 1,300,000
Total
Department 90 Water
2015 2019 thru
Contact Howard Iman
Description
Replace and increase size of water mains:
Undesignated water main upgrades
Project # 08-WA-001
Justification
To increase fire fighting capabilities and to improve water quality
Project Name Water Main Upgrades
Category Utilities
Type Improvement
City Project Code WMAINS
1,500,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Construction/Maintenance
300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000
Total
1,500,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Water Fund
300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000
Total
Department 90 Water
2015 2019 thru
Contact Howard Iman
Description
St Louis Avenue Water Main Phase I of III - 10 Street to 17th Street
St Louis Avenue Water Main Phase II of III - 4th Street to 10th Street
St Louis Avenue Water Main Phase III of III - North Division to 4th Street
Project # 11-WA-002
Priority 1 Critical
Justification
To increase fire fighting capabilities and to improve water quality
Project Name St Louis Ave Water Main Upgrade
Category Utilities
Type Improvement
City Project Code
350,000 350,000
Total
350,000 350,000 Water Fund
350,000 350,000
Total
Department 90 Water
2015 2019 thru
Contact Howard Iman
Description
Wells are monitored and one to two wells are extensively examined and repaired each year.
Project # 11-WA-003
Justification
Ocean City draws most of its water from the Ocean City aquifer (over 300') and the Manokin aquifer (over 400'). Wells are subject to corrosion
and continual maintenance is required to preserve water quality and volume.
Project Name Well Rehabilitation
Category Utilities
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
600,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Construction/Maintenance
120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 600,000
Total
600,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Water Fund
120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 600,000
Total
Department 90 Water
2015 2019 thru
Contact Howard Iman
Description
Sandblasting, painting, and corrosion prevention of water storage towers and tanks. One tank or tower is painted each year.
Project # 11-WA-006
Justification
Project Name Storage Towers and Tanks
Category Utilities
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
3,575,000 875,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 Construction/Maintenance
875,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 3,575,000
Total
3,575,500 875,500 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 Water Fund
875,500 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 3,575,500
Total
Department 90 Water
2015 2019 thru
Contact Howard Iman
Description
This work is necessary to ensure future safety of the Towns water supply and to comply with current and future State and Federal drinking water
standards.
Project # 14-WA-001
Justification
The Towns raw groundwater supply contains naturally occurring organic compounds which can combine with chlorine to cause the formation of
potentially harmful disinfection byproducts (DBPs). Funding is needed for the next several years to enable research to be conducted and for
physical improvements to be made to the water treatment plants and the treated water storage and distribution system to ensure that DBPs do not
cause problems with the safety of the Towns drinking water.
Project Name Disinfection byproduct project
Type Improvement
City Project Code
800,000 800,000 0 0 Construction/Maintenance
800,000 0 0 800,000
Total
800,000 800,000 0 0 Water Fund
800,000 0 0 800,000
Total
Department 90 Water
2015 2019 thru
Contact Howard Iman
Description
Phase I of II - Conversion to automatic water meter reading
Project # 15-WA-001
Justification
To update/improve current system
Useful Life
Project Name Conversion To Automatic Water Meter Reading
Category Utilities
Type Unassigned
City Project Code
600,000 600,000
Total
600,000 600,000 Water Fund
600,000 600,000
Total
Department 90 Water
2015 2019 thru
Contact Howard Iman
Description
Extension of raw water main from 52nd to 66th Street to service proposed new treatment plant
Project # 16-WA-001
Justification
Project Name Raw Water main Extension to 66th
Category Utilities
Type Unassigned
City Project Code
1,450,000 725,000 725,000 Construction/Maintenance
725,000 725,000 1,450,000
Total
1,450,000 725,000 725,000 Water Fund
725,000 725,000 1,450,000
Total
Department 90 Water
2015 2019 thru
Contact Howard Iman
Description
Purchase of 67th St land from Sandpiper Energy for future water treatment plant
Project # 17-WA-001
Justification
In accordance with the Gas Franchise, the Town of Ocean City, has First Right of Refusal and/or Option to Purchase the land currently owned by
the Gas Company at 67th Street. Also, in accordance with the Franchise Agreement, they have until August of 2018 (Franchise Term of 10 years
from May 7, 2007 plus 15 month, if necessary) to remove the above ground tank farm at that location. It is a known fact to the MCC that our
intention is to purchase their property for the Water Departments future site of the 66th Street Water Treatment Plant. In accordance with the
appraised values of property that have been sold within the general area of 65th Street over the last few years, a value of $1,250,000 has been
assigned to the land purchase for planning purposes. We had projected/planned to fund this need via a two year set-aside allocation of $625,000
per year FY17 and FY18 BUT do not feel it will be affordable under the current Rate Structure as a pay as you go funding effort. Additionally,
the overall project will also involve the construction of a raw water main manifold line from 52nd to 66th Street, and the construction of the
Treatment Plant itself. The project as a whole may be discussed to determine the best funding scenario
Project Name 67th St Water Treatment Plant Land
Type Improvement
City Project Code
0 0 Planning/Design
1,250,000 625,000 625,000 Land Acquisition
0 625,000 625,000 1,250,000
Total
1,250,000 0 625,000 625,000 Water Fund
0 625,000 625,000 1,250,000
Total
Department 90 Water
2015 2019 thru
Contact Howard Iman
Description
Misc upgrades to existing treatment plants
Project # 17-WA-002
Justification
Required for permit compliance and to maintain existing infrastrucure
Project Name Treatment Plant Upgrades
Category Utilities
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
360,000 610,000 970,000
Total
970,000 360,000 610,000 Water Fund
360,000 610,000 970,000
Total
Department 90 Water
2015 2019 thru
Contact
Description
Construction of a new 1 million gallon water tank at the First Street and St. Louis Ave pump station property. Tank would replace existing tanks at
Worcester Street and 15th Streets
Project # 17-WA-003
Priority n/a
Justification
New tank will replace existing tanks located at Worcester Street lot and 15th street lot. This will recude maintenance costs, free up more valuable
property for other city uses, and is a better location for system hydraulics.
Useful Life
Project Name First Street Water Tank
Category Unassigned
Type Unassigned
City Project Code
4,295,000 2,022,500 2,022,500 250,000 Construction/Maintenance
165,000 2,022,500 2,022,500 250,000 4,460,000
Total
4,295,000 4,295,000 Bond Financing - Water Fees
165,000 165,000 Water Fund
165,000 4,295,000 4,460,000
Total
Department 91 Wastewater
2015 2019 thru
Contact Charlie Felin
Description
Replace or repair failing sewer lines to maintain integrity of collection system
Project # 07-WW-004
Justification
Sewer lines and manholes that are worn and failing require repair or replacement in order to avoid blockages, structural collapse, sanitary sewer
overflows, etc. The current inventory of sewer pipes known to need repair or replacement that are beneath the streets that have recently been paved
is approximately 10,000 linear feet. In addition it is known that there is a substantial amount of old asbestos concrete pipe underground which, due
to known age and related deterioration issues with this type of pipe, also needs to be lined or replaced. The funds allocated for this purpose will
enable this rehabilitation work to be performed to ensure that the underground network of sewer pipes and manholes remains in good working
condition.
Project Name Wastewater Mains
Category Utilities
Type Improvement
City Project Code wwmains
12,500,000 500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 Construction/Maintenance
500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 12,500,000
Total
12,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 Bond Financing - Wastewater
fees
500,000 500,000 Wastewater Fund
500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 12,500,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Design and Construct an additional secondary clarifier at wastewater treatment plant
Project # 09-WW-002
Justification
The secondary clarifiers collectively perform a vital process to enable the WWTP to maintain compliance with effluent standards. The units
operate in parallel, and all three of the existing units are required to be in continuous operation during the summer season in order to treat the high
flow volume. A fourth clarifier is proposed to provide the WWTP with redundancy and the ability to maintain permit compliance in the event of
the failure of one of the units. The addition of another clarifier will also enhance the performance of this aspect of the WWTP and improve its
ability to comply with current and future regulatory standards.
Project Name 4th Secondary Clarifier & Improvements
Category Utilities
Type Improvement
City Project Code
5,500,000 5,500,000
Total
5,500,000 5,500,000 Bond Financing - Wastewater
fees
5,500,000 5,500,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Replace chlornation / dechlorination systems with a technology that utilizes less hazardous chemicals.
Project # 12-WW-002
Justification
The gas chlorine and gas sulfur dioxide chemical that are currently in use at the plant are highly hazardous chemicals. Technologies exist at this
time that would allow the disinfection process to be accomplished with the use of less hazardous chemicals, thus reducing the potential exposure of
staff as well as the users of the planned public boat ramp that will be located adjacent to the WWTP in the near future.
Project Name Effluent Disinfection System Upgrade
Category Utilities
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
1,320,000 1,320,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Replace sewer mains and manholes.
Project # 12-WW-003
Justification
Replace worn sewer mains and manholes in St. Louis & side streets as required. This is part of the planned street improvement project for St. Louis
Ave from N. Division Street to 17th Street.
Useful Life
Project Name St Louis Avenue Improvements
Category Utilities
Type Unassigned
City Project Code WWLOUI
275,000 275,000
Total
275,000 275,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Install a structural liner within the section of the Ocean outfall pipe that lies beneath the beach.
Project # 15-WW-001
Justification
The Ocean outfall was constructed in 1968. The portion of the pipe that lies to the ocean side of the air release valve (ARV) at the east end of 64th
street consists of approximately 4,200 linear feet of 30 inch prestressed concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP). The first 340 linear feet of the PCCP,
which extends eastward from the ARV to the shoreline, was originally designed and installed to support 10 feet of wet sand cover. However, with
the shoreline enhancement that has occurred in Ocean City in the time since 1968, the sand load over the pipe has been documented to be up to a
maximum depth of 21 feet underneath the dunes. Therefore, in consideration of the original design and the age of the pipe, taking action to install
a structural liner to reinforce the pipe would be a prudent safeguard measure to undertake so to ensure the continued use of this vital infrastructure
component.
Project Name Ocean Outfall Lining Reinforcement
Category Utilities
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
1,100,000 1,000,000 100,000 Construction/Maintenance
1,000,000 100,000 1,100,000
Total
1,100,000 1,100,000 Wastewater Fund
1,100,000 1,100,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Replace east fournier press
Project # 15-WW-005
Priority 1 Critical
Justification
equipment needs replacing, end of useful life
Project Name Fournier press
Category Utilities
Type Equipment
City Project Code
350,000 350,000
Total
350,000 350,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
MCCA replacements
Project # 16-WW-001
Justification
end of useful life
Project Name Primary influent building MCCA
Category Utilities
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
425,000 425,000
Total
425,000 425,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Repairs and upgrade of SCADA system in oxygen building to improve remote control of processes
Project # 17-WW-001
Justification
Equipment needs to be replaced as new equipment has improved functions
Project Name Oxygen Bldg SCADA upgrades
Category Utilities
Type Maintenance
City Project Code
600,000 600,000
Total
600,000 600,000 Bond Financing - Wastewater
fees
600,000 600,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Replace entire underground pumping station and add stand-by power.
Project # 18-WW-001
Justification
Equipment reaching the end of it's useful life due to wear and corrosion. Stand-by capability is an MDE requirement. Adding a stand-by pump will
prevent sewage back-ups during power outages. System reliability must be improved upon. Centrifugal pumps will be replaced with submersible
pumps.
Project Name 28th Street Pumping Station
Type Equipment
City Project Code
425,000 425,000
Total
425,000 425,000 Bond Financing - Wastewater
fees
425,000 425,000
Total
2015 2019 thru
Description
Chloring contact chamber expansion
Project # 18-WW-002
Justification
Project Name Expansion of chlorine contact chamber
Category Utilities
Type Improvement
City Project Code
300,000 1,200,000 1,500,000
Total
1,500,000 1,500,000 Bond Financing - Wastewater
fees
1,500,000 1,500,000
Total
PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT
2015 2019 thru
Total 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Department Project# Priority
1 Public Safety
08-PS-05 6,000,000 600,000 5,400,000 Mid-Town Fire Station 3
15-PS-001 150,000 150,000 Public Safety Building Generator Replacement 3
15-PS-002 300,000 10,000 290,000 Public Safety Building Chillers and Cooling Tower 3
6,450,000 760,000 5,690,000
1 Public Safety Total
3 General Public Works
15-HS-002 840,000 40,000 800,000 Replacement of Whiteside Facility 3
15-HS-003 160,000 80,000 80,000 City Wide Security Improvements 2
1,000,000 120,000 880,000
3 General Public Works Total
31 Municipal Complex Expansion
07-TR-001 1,800,000 1,800,000 Municipal Facility - 65th St Public Works Complex 3
15-HS-001 0 0 0 Relocation of DPWYard 3
1,800,000 1,800,000 0
31 Municipal Complex Expansion
Total
32 Highways and Streets
08-HS-002 60,000 60,000 94th Street Landscape Strips 4
08-HS-003 2,400,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Caine Woods Street Improvements 4
08-HS-006 5,147,000 2,715,000 2,432,000 0 0 Undergrounding of Utilities 3
08-HS-010 12,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 Street Improvements & Overlays 1
09-HS-002 1,731,000 1,731,000 St. Louis Ave Improvements 3
09-HS-012 2,000,000 400,000 1,600,000 Philadelphia Ave Transit Lane 3
23,338,000 6,446,000 6,092,000 3,600,000 4,000,000 3,200,000
32 Highways and Streets Total
4 Recreation and Parks
08-RP-001 500,000 500,000 Sunset Park - Phase 2 - Pier 4
08-RP-006 820,334 820,334 Skate Park Renovations & Expansion 2
08-RP-008 3,515,000 140,000 1,375,000 2,000,000 Downtown Recreation Complex Improvements 2
09-RP-003 100,000 100,000 NSP - Soccer Field Light Renovation 4
11-RP-002 15,000 15,000 Parks Garage Storage Expan Design/Construction 4
12-RP-001 180,000 180,000 NSP - Bio-Retention Improvements: North Boundary 4
12-RP-003 155,000 95,000 60,000 NSP Parking Lot Repairs and Improvements 3
14-RP-006 265,000 85,000 95,000 85,000 Playground Replacements 2
15-RP-001 1,200,000 1,200,000 Eagles Landing Irrigation System 1
6,750,334 1,435,000 2,255,334 2,685,000 95,000 280,000
4 Recreation and Parks Total
51 Environmental
08-EV-001 1,850,000 250,000 500,000 500,000 600,000 Canal Dredging 2
11-MC-009 750,000 750,000 Boat ramp at 64th Street 1
14-EV-002 175,000 175,000 Public Works Yard Bulkhead 3
14-EV-003 2,000,000 2,000,000 Chicago Ave Bulkhead 3
4,775,000 425,000 1,250,000 500,000 600,000 2,000,000
51 Environmental Total
52Technology & Communications
TC-14-001 500,000 500,000 VOIP Phone System/Network 3
TC-14-002 9,500,000 500,000 9,000,000 800 MHz Radio System 1
TC-15-003 570,000 5,000 565,000 Network communications replacement 2
TC-15-004 105,000 105,000 Netscaler Gateway 3
TC15-005 410,000 110,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Offsite Network Disaster Recovery 1
TC-15-006 135,000 5,000 130,000 Council Chambers Audio/Visual Upgrade 2
11,220,000 225,000 1,795,000 9,100,000 100,000
52Technology & Communications
Total
6 Convention Center
14-CC-003 10,100,000 100,000 10,000,000 Convention Center Hall A-B Expansion 3
15-CC-001 500,000 80,000 420,000 Life Saving Museum Elevator and Exit Stairs 3
10,600,000 180,000 10,420,000
6 Convention Center Total
7 Airport
14-AI-002 770,000 170,000 600,000 Runway 02/20 7 14/32 Obstruction Removal 3
14-AI-004 4,320,000 700,000 3,620,000 Taxiway A Relocation 3
14-AI-005 550,000 550,000 Rehabilitate Runway 14/32 3
15-AI-001 850,000 850,000 Hangar K 3
16-AI-001 120,000 120,000 Airport Water & Sewer Connection 3
16-AI-002 850,000 850,000 Hangar & Commercial Office Building 4
17-AI-001 1,700,000 1,700,000 Apron Expansion 4
17-AI-002 1,300,000 500,000 800,000 Localizer Relocation 3
10,460,000 120,000 170,000 2,650,000 5,270,000 2,250,000
7 Airport Total
90 Water
08-WA-001 1,500,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Water Main Upgrades 3
11-WA-002 350,000 350,000 St Louis Ave Water Main Upgrade 1
11-WA-003 600,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Well Rehabilitation 2
11-WA-006 3,575,000 875,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 Storage Towers and Tanks 2
14-WA-001 800,000 800,000 0 0 Disinfection byproduct project 3
15-WA-001 600,000 600,000 Conversion To Automatic Water Meter Reading 4
16-WA-001 1,450,000 725,000 725,000 Raw Water main Extension to 66th 3
17-WA-001 1,250,000 0 625,000 625,000 67th St Water Treatment Plant Land 3
17-WA-002 970,000 360,000 610,000 Treatment Plant Upgrades 3
17-WA-003 4,460,000 165,000 2,022,500 2,022,500 250,000 First Street Water Tank n/a
15,555,000 2,610,000 3,477,500 3,742,500 3,305,000 2,420,000
90 Water Total
91 Wastewater
07-WW-004 12,500,000 500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 Wastewater Mains 2
09-WW-002 5,500,000 5,500,000 4th Secondary Clarifier & Improvements 3
12-WW-002 1,320,000 1,320,000 Effluent Disinfection System Upgrade 3
12-WW-003 275,000 275,000 St Louis Avenue Improvements 3
15-WW-001 1,100,000 1,000,000 100,000 Ocean Outfall Lining Reinforcement 3
15-WW-005 350,000 350,000 Fournier press 1
16-WW-001 425,000 425,000 Primary influent building MCCA 2
17-WW-001 600,000 600,000 Oxygen Bldg SCADA upgrades 2
18-WW-001 425,000 425,000 28th Street Pumping Station 2
18-WW-002 1,500,000 300,000 1,200,000 Expansion of chlorine contact chamber 3
23,995,000 2,445,000 4,425,000 9,200,000 3,725,000 4,200,000
91 Wastewater Total
GRAND TOTAL
115,943,334 13,706,000 21,564,834 43,537,500 22,785,000 14,350,000
PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE
2015 2019 thru
Total Source Project# Priority 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Bond Financing - General Fund
08-PS-05 6,000,000 6,000,000 Mid-Town Fire Station 3
08-RP-001 500,000 500,000 Sunset Park - Phase 2 - Pier 4
08-RP-006 820,334 820,334 Skate Park Renovations & Expansion 2
08-RP-008 3,515,000 3,515,000 Downtown Recreation Complex Improvements 2
09-HS-012 2,000,000 2,000,000 Philadelphia Ave Transit Lane 3
14-EV-003 2,000,000 2,000,000 Chicago Ave Bulkhead 3
15-CC-001 500,000 500,000 Life Saving Museum Elevator and Exit Stairs 3
15-HS-002 840,000 840,000 Replacement of Whiteside Facility 3
16,175,334 5,675,334 500,000 8,000,000 2,000,000
Bond Financing - General Fund Total
Bond Financing - OCCC Food Tax
14-CC-003 5,000,000 5,000,000 Convention Center Hall A-B Expansion 3
5,000,000 5,000,000
Bond Financing - OCCC Food Tax Total
Bond Financing - User fee supported
15-AI-001 850,000 850,000 Hangar K 3
15-RP-001 1,200,000 1,200,000 Eagles Landing Irrigation System 1
16-AI-002 850,000 850,000 Hangar & Commercial Office Building 4
2,900,000 1,200,000 850,000 850,000
Bond Financing - User fee supported
Total
Bond Financing - Wastewater fees
07-WW-004 12,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 Wastewater Mains 2
09-WW-002 5,500,000 5,500,000 4th Secondary Clarifier & Improvements 3
17-WW-001 600,000 600,000 Oxygen Bldg SCADA upgrades 2
18-WW-001 425,000 425,000 28th Street Pumping Station 2
18-WW-002 1,500,000 1,500,000 Expansion of chlorine contact chamber 3
20,025,000 3,000,000 9,100,000 4,925,000 3,000,000
Bond Financing - Wastewater fees Total
Bond Financing - Water Fees
17-WA-003 4,295,000 4,295,000 First Street Water Tank n/a
4,295,000 4,295,000
Bond Financing - Water Fees Total
Capital Equipment Lease
TC-14-001 500,000 500,000 VOIP Phone System/Network 3
TC-14-002 9,000,000 9,000,000 800 MHz Radio System 1
TC-15-003 565,000 565,000 Network communications replacement 2
10,065,000 1,065,000 9,000,000
Capital Equipment Lease Total
Corporate Grant
TC-15-006 25,000 25,000 Council Chambers Audio/Visual Upgrade 2
25,000 25,000
Corporate Grant Total
Federal Grants
09-HS-012 0 0 Philadelphia Ave Transit Lane 3
14-AI-004 3,888,000 630,000 3,258,000 Taxiway A Relocation 3
17-AI-001 1,530,000 1,530,000 Apron Expansion 4
17-AI-002 1,170,000 450,000 720,000 Localizer Relocation 3
7,775,518 152,518 1,620,000 3,978,000 2,025,000
Federal Grants Total
General Fund
07-TR-001 600,000 600,000 Municipal Facility - 65th St Public Works Complex 3
08-EV-001 1,850,000 250,000 500,000 600,000 500,000 Canal Dredging 2
08-HS-002 60,000 60,000 94th Street Landscape Strips 4
08-HS-003 2,400,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Caine Woods Street Improvements 4
08-HS-006 2,432,000 2,432,000 0 0 Undergrounding of Utilities 3
08-HS-010 9,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 Street Improvements & Overlays 1
11-RP-002 290,000 15,000 275,000 Parks Garage Storage Expan Design/Construction 4
12-RP-001 180,000 180,000 NSP - Bio-Retention Improvements: North Boundary 4
12-RP-003 155,000 155,000 NSP Parking Lot Repairs and Improvements 3
14-AI-004 216,000 35,000 181,000 Taxiway A Relocation 3
14-CC-003 100,000 100,000 Convention Center Hall A-B Expansion 3
14-EV-002 175,000 175,000 Public Works Yard Bulkhead 3
15-HS-001 0 0 Relocation of DPWYard 3
15-HS-003 160,000 80,000 80,000 City Wide Security Improvements 2
15-PS-001 150,000 150,000 Public Safety Building Generator Replacement 3
15-PS-002 300,000 300,000 Public Safety Building Chillers and Cooling Tower 3
16-AI-001 120,000 120,000 Airport Water & Sewer Connection 3
17-AI-001 85,000 85,000 Apron Expansion 4
17-AI-002 65,000 25,000 40,000 Localizer Relocation 3
TC-15-003 5,000 5,000 Network communications replacement 2
TC15-005 400,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Offsite Network Disaster Recovery 1
TC-15-006 110,000 110,000 Council Chambers Audio/Visual Upgrade 2
18,918,973 2,550,000 6,745,473 3,620,000 3,916,000 2,087,500
General Fund Total
Not funded current year !
08-HS-006 2,715,000 2,715,000 Undergrounding of Utilities 3
TC-15-004 105,000 105,000 Netscaler Gateway 3
TC15-005 110,000 110,000 Offsite Network Disaster Recovery 1
2,930,000 2,930,000
Not funded current year ! Total
Prior project balance
09-HS-002 1,731,000 1,731,000 St. Louis Ave Improvements 3
11-MC-009 750,000 750,000 Boat ramp at 64th Street 1
2,481,000 1,731,000 750,000
Prior project balance Total
Property Sale
15-HS-001 0 0 Relocation of DPWYard 3
0 0
Property Sale Total
State Grants
07-TR-001 1,200,000 1,200,000 Municipal Facility - 65th St Public Works Complex 3
14-AI-004 216,000 35,000 181,000 Taxiway A Relocation 3
14-CC-003 5,000,000 5,000,000 Convention Center Hall A-B Expansion 3
14-RP-006 265,000 85,000 95,000 85,000 Playground Replacements 2
17-AI-001 85,000 85,000 Apron Expansion 4
17-AI-002 65,000 25,000 40,000 Localizer Relocation 3
6,896,973 1,208,473 5,175,000 316,000 197,500
State Grants Total
State Loan
09-RP-003 100,000 100,000 NSP - Soccer Field Light Renovation 4
100,000 100,000
State Loan Total
User fees
08-HS-010 3,000,000 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Street Improvements & Overlays 1
3,000,000 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
User fees Total
Vehicle & Equipment Fund
TC-14-002 500,000 500,000 800 MHz Radio System 1
500,000 500,000
Vehicle & Equipment Fund Total
Wastewater Fund
07-WW-004 500,000 500,000 Wastewater Mains 2
12-WW-003 275,000 275,000 St Louis Avenue Improvements 3
15-WW-001 1,100,000 1,100,000 Ocean Outfall Lining Reinforcement 3
15-WW-005 350,000 350,000 Fournier press 1
16-WW-001 425,000 425,000 Primary influent building MCCA 2
2,650,000 1,125,000 1,525,000
Wastewater Fund Total
Water Fund
08-WA-001 1,500,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Water Main Upgrades 3
11-WA-002 350,000 350,000 St Louis Ave Water Main Upgrade 1
11-WA-003 600,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Well Rehabilitation 2
11-WA-006 3,575,500 875,500 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 Storage Towers and Tanks 2
14-WA-001 800,000 800,000 0 0 Disinfection byproduct project 3
15-WA-001 600,000 600,000 Conversion To Automatic Water Meter Reading 4
16-WA-001 1,450,000 725,000 725,000 Raw Water main Extension to 66th 3
17-WA-001 1,250,000 0 625,000 625,000 67th St Water Treatment Plant Land 3
17-WA-002 970,000 360,000 610,000 Treatment Plant Upgrades 3
17-WA-003 165,000 165,000 First Street Water Tank n/a
11,260,500 2,610,500 1,455,000 1,720,000 3,055,000 2,420,000
Water Fund Total
114,998,298 12,171,500 27,371,798 37,685,000 26,040,000 11,730,000
GRAND TOTAL


5. NEW BUSINESS

I. Request for Authorization to Proceed with Construction of
Single-lane Boat Ramp presented by City Engineer

TOWN OF

FROM: David L. Recor, ICMA-CM, City Manager
RE: Boat ramp project at south end of Seabay Drive and 64
th
Street

ISSUE(S): Authorization to proceed with single-lane boat ramp

SUMMARY: Request Mayor and Council authorization to proceed with permit
application to build a single-lane boat ramp while condemnation
proceedings are concluded.

FISCAL IMPACT: To be determined.

RECOMMENDATION: Move forward with permit to construct single-lane ramp.

More Livable Community for Residents

ALTERNATIVES: Do not obtain permit at this time.

RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Terence McGean, City Engineer

COORDINATED WITH: Not applicable

ATTACHMENT(S): None

Agenda Item # 5I

August 12 2014 Complete Agenda

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

August 12 2014 Complete Agenda

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

MAYORANDCITYCOUNCIL

S-ar putea să vă placă și