0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
89 vizualizări22 pagini
Arsenic (As) is major contaminant present in wastes from metallurgical and mining industries of non-ferrous. Many efforts have been made to confine as for disposing in relatively stable phases. Scorodite can dissolve either congruently or incongruently, depending on pH.
Arsenic (As) is major contaminant present in wastes from metallurgical and mining industries of non-ferrous. Many efforts have been made to confine as for disposing in relatively stable phases. Scorodite can dissolve either congruently or incongruently, depending on pH.
Arsenic (As) is major contaminant present in wastes from metallurgical and mining industries of non-ferrous. Many efforts have been made to confine as for disposing in relatively stable phases. Scorodite can dissolve either congruently or incongruently, depending on pH.
1 Departamento de Ingeniera de Minera, Pontificia Universidad Catlica de Chile (ceverdug@uc.cl) 2 Departament of Mining and Material Engineering, McGill University (george.demopoulos@mcgill.ca) Outline 1. Introduction Problems and challenges of arsenic in metallurgic process 2. Objectives What are the goals of this research? 3. Methodology Synthesis Stability test Characterization 4. Results Characterization of initial solids Stability test Characterization final 5. Discussion and Conclusions
2 Introduction Arsenic (As) is major contaminant present in wastes from metallurgical and mining industries of non-ferrous. Due to its high toxicity, environmental regulations are becoming increasingly more stringent regardings its environmental disposal. Many efforts have been made to confine As for disposing in relatively stable phases and therefore, immobilize this toxic element. Mainly two methods Co-precipitation of As(V) with Fe(III) by lime neutralization in the form of poorly- crystalline Fe(III)-AsO 4 solids (molar ratio > 3) Crystalline scorodite: 1.- Autoclave : 150 C or higher 2.- Atmospheric: 95 C, involving supersaturation control, avoiding nucleation. Introduction - Methodology - Results - Conclusions 3 Previous work on scorodite has focused on the determination of its stability in oxidizing conditions. In fact, can dissolve either congruently or incongruently, depending on pH.
Congruent dissolution: FeAsO 4 2H 2 O + H + => H 2 AsO 4 - + Fe(OH) 2+ + H 2 O (Dove and Rimstidt, 1985)
Incongruent dissolution: FeAsO 4 2H 2 O + H 2 O => H 2 AsO 4 - + Fe(OH) 3(s) + H + (Zhu and Merkel, 2001)
FeAsO 4 2H 2 O + H 2 O =>HAsO 4 2- + Fe(OH) 3(s) + 2H + (Zhu and Merkel, 2001)
However little is known under reducing conditions. Why would be important to study this condition?
The dissolved oxygen concentration decreases as the depth increases in tailings ponds, contributing to various reducing media, generating the potential release of As to the environment.
The reductive dissolution of scorodite could be catalyzed by Fe (III)-reducing bacteria, such as Shewanella alga or Desulfuromonas palmitatis amongst others, which release dissolved arsenate as a result of dissimilatory reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II) (Cummings, et al., 1999; Papassiopi et al., 2003). 4 Introduction - Methodology - Results - Conclusions Introduction First motivation Gypsum! 5 Introduction - Methodology - Results - Conclusions Introduction Second motivation Lime is widely used for neutralization of sulphate-containing acidic effluents (Langmuir et al., 1999; Jia & Demopoulos, 2008). Due to this, the porewater of mining and metallurgical tailings ponds are gypsum-saturated (Bluteau et al. 2009). This opens the possible interaction of scorodite and gypsum or its constituents Ca 2+ or SO 4 2-
Some facts: Objectives
This research considers 2 goals under concentrated aqueous solutions of As (40 g/L):
1. To determine the stability of atmospheric scorodite from oxic to anoxic conditions at pH 7 until its equilibrium is reached. 2. To evaluate the behavior of scorodite particles under Redox conditions and pH 7 in the presence of gypsum-saturated environments. 6 Introduction - Methodology - Results - Conclusions Methodology Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 7 Methodology Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 8 Methodology 1.- Synthesis and characterization of atmospheric scorodite. 2.- Stability test and full characterization of scorodite particles. Methodology Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 9 XRD Raman ATR-IR SEM Chemical analysis Methodology Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 10 Methodology 1.- Synthesis and characterization of atmospheric scorodite. 2.- Stability test and full characterization of scorodite particles. Methodology Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 11 No gypsum Saturated- gypsum 1M NaOH 0,5M CaO 1. Chemical analysis 2. XRD 3. SEM 4. ATR-IR 5. RAMAN Redox conditions: DI water 400 mV 250mV -100mV Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 12 Results Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 13 Results 1.- Synthesis and characterization of atmospheric scorodite. Atm. scorodite I n t e n s i t y
( r e l a t i v e )
Figure 1: XRD patterns. R a m a n
i n t e n s i t y
( r e l a t i v e )
Figure 2: Raman spectroscopy. Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 14 Results 1.- Synthesis and characterization of atmospheric scorodite. Figure 3: ATR-IR spectrum. Figure 4: SEM images. Figure 5: 1M NaOH No Gypsum. Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 15 Results 2.- Stability test and full characterization of scorodite particles. Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 16 Results 2.- Stability test and full characterization of scorodite particles. Figure 7: 0,5 CaO - Gypsum saturated. Figure 6: 1M NaOH - Gypsum saturated. Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 17 Results 2.- Stability test and full characterization of scorodite particles. Wavenumber (cm -1 ) Figure 8: XRD patterns after stability test. Figure 9: Raman spectroscopy after stability test. Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 18 Results 2.- Stability test and full characterization of scorodite particles. Wavenumber (cm -1 ) Figure 10: ATR-IR spectra after stability test. Figure 11: SEM images after stability test. Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 19 Conclusions
It was found that the use of NaOH as base during stability test, caused problems resulting in high arsenic release, due to apparent strong local release of alkalinity.
The release of arsenic from scorodite particles was dramatically mitigated, due to the presence of gypsum.
With the exception of the 100 mV severe anoxic environment, the release of arsenic from atmospheric scorodite in the presence of calcium/gypsum did not exceed 5 mg/L, even under mild reducing potential of about 250 mV.
This implies that from a disposal point of view scorodites arsenic release rate is manageable when it is codeposited with gypsum near neutral pH and not less than 250 mV reducing environment. Introduction Methodology Results - Conclusions 20 Conclusions
In fact, some publications support this phenomenon:
i. Harris and Monette, 1987 and Krause and Ettel 1989 found that Ca(OH) 2
yielded lower residual As concentration than NaOH. ii. Similar results were found by Emett and Khoe 1994, where the presence of calcium ions decreased significantly the dissolved As in neutral to alkaline pH range conditions. iii. Latter Jia and Demopoulos 2005, observed soluble calcium sulphate enhanced the uptake of arsenate by ferrihydrite. iv. Bluteau and colleagues 2009, postulated that the co-adsortion of Ca 2+ with arsenate on ferrihydrite was one of the As retention enhancement The real interaction of scorodite with Ca 2+ and/or SO 4 2- is still unknown Acknowledgment 21 This research was carried out at McGills Hydrometallurgy Laboratory supported via NSERC CRD grant. Additional support was provided by:
Beca apoyo de realizacin de tesis doctoral CONICYT N 24091003. Vicerrectora de Investigacin (VRI), Pontificia Universidad Catlica de Chile. Direccin de Postgrado de la Escuela de Ingeniera UC (DIPEII), from Pontificia Universidad Catlica de Chile. Study of Arsenic release of atmospheric Scorodite in reductive environments Csar Verdugo 1 , Gustavo Lagos 1
Levente Becze 2 ,
Mario Gmez 2 & George Demopoulos 2
1 Departamento de Ingeniera de Minera, Pontificia Universidad Catlica de Chile (ceverdug@uc.cl) 2 Departament of Mining and Material Engineering, McGill University (george.demopoulos@mcgill.ca)