Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
there are both good and bad impact. digital drawing can be precise
but may not have the output same as the manual media with more
human touch. there are some new type of Architecture, which is
generated only because of the digital media. It is now used widely.
3d perspective, walkthrough/animation can make virtual reality
effects [although it takes lots of time and energy].
The first is the gap between the professional and non-professional. the revolution generally
causes controversy. Even though many people only use computer to type and e-mail, they don't
hesitate to criticize and question the digital architecture.
The second is the gap between two exiting generation and digital generation. We define the
generation every 10 years. It's not easy for the different generations to communicate with
each other. The generation gap between the existing generation and the digital generation can
be easily seen in the debate of architectural design process, presentation, space, volume,
concept and aesthetics (a Taiwanese architectural student almost got flunk for using the
computation presentation instead of tradition drawings and models). The gaps exist
everywhere in the world. For instance, the digital generation uses computer to white, thinking
the traditional writing time-consuming, while the other generation criticizes the writing in the
e-mail as "the writing without quality". This kind of criticism sounds familiar, we can trace it
back to seventy years ago, while the Chinese modern literature replaces the classical
literature. The Renaissance people who write in quill and brown ink may have the same
criticism towards the stationery today.
The third is the gap between the architectural and non-architectural field. Focusing more on
the arts, history and culture, architecture always reacts slowly for the technology revolution.
For instance, the communication has been totally digitalized, the architects still merely use
metal and glass to express the avant-guard architecture, without digitalizing the design
process. Meanwhile, the architectural education hardly puts any effort to keep up with the
rapid change of the digital technology. It's possible that the traditional architectural
education is still based on the philosophical, social, historical and psychological theory.
Last of all, we should use the tool whenever it is necessary and should use both methods
simultaneously [as hybrid method] as we have the opportunity to choose.