0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
16 vizualizări6 pagini
This paper discusses the generation of voltage in the PWM frequency range by the inverter, particularly for both the common mode signals. Common mode harmonics are of particular concern because of increased potential for electromagnetic interference (EMI) a passive inverter filter is proposed and shown to minimize both the ground quantities and the harmonic levels on the system.
This paper discusses the generation of voltage in the PWM frequency range by the inverter, particularly for both the common mode signals. Common mode harmonics are of particular concern because of increased potential for electromagnetic interference (EMI) a passive inverter filter is proposed and shown to minimize both the ground quantities and the harmonic levels on the system.
This paper discusses the generation of voltage in the PWM frequency range by the inverter, particularly for both the common mode signals. Common mode harmonics are of particular concern because of increased potential for electromagnetic interference (EMI) a passive inverter filter is proposed and shown to minimize both the ground quantities and the harmonic levels on the system.
Common mode and EMI concerns in PWM inverters supplying general loads
Thomas H. Ortmeyer Madelyn Baker Clifford Whitcomb
ECE Department Clarkson University Potsdam, NY 13699-5720 Abstract - Pulse width modulated (PWM) inverters are increasingly present on the power system. This paper discusses the generation of voltage in the PWM frequency range by the inverter, particularly for both the common mode signals. A model is developed to study the propagation of these frequencies through the input and output leads of the inverter. The paper provides a discussion of the various techniques for reducing the inverter output in this frequency range, and it is shown that both common mode and differential mode noise reduction should be considered. The need for specification of the common mode output voltage wave for many of these applications is shown. Keywords: Power quality, inverters, ground current. I. INTRODUCTION This paper presents an analysis of common mode harmonic levels in a balanced, ungrounded power distribution system. The objective of the work was to analyze common mode problems in an ungrounded power distribution system which includes electronic power conversion. Common mode harmonics are of particular concern because of increased potential for electromagnetic interference (EMI). The paper discusses common mode 0-7803-6420-1/00/$10.00 (c) 2000 IBEE Naval Construction and Engineering Program LCDR, USN Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 021 39 harmonic generation and propagation. It also considers methods of harmonic reduction. Finally, the relationship to existing limits is considered, particularly to the existing military standards. The research described in this paper involved computer simulation of various operating modes of the system and subsequent symmetrical component analysis of the result. These results show that, under certain conditions, high levels of common mode current may be present in the unintentional ground path created by the system stray capacitance. A passive inverter filter is proposed and shown to minimize both the ground quantities and the harmonic levels on the system. II. MODEL OF SYSTEM STUDIED 2543 The power system was modeled as shown in Figure 1. The system is fed from a generator supplied 60Hz three phase AC source and includes a DC link to a three phase AC load. Power electronic converters are used to convert between the DC bus voltage and the AC source and loads. The transformer provides galvanic isolation between the generator and distribution system, with the acdc-ac system operated without isolation. In the study system, this entire network was ungrounded, as is common is shipboard power systems. Similar results would be obtained for this system with a single galvanic ground. While the distribution system is ungrounded, stray capacitance of various system components can create an unintentional ground path for current flow. These ground path currents can contain substantial harmonics of the converter operating frequencies and of the resonance frequencies of the system inductance and capacitance. Two base power system topologies were studied source frequency (60Hz in this case). PWM Rsag Figure 1 Model of system studied for this project. For each, the basic system is as shown in Figure 1. The first system studied had the DC bus filter inductance entirely on the positive bus (IPS1); the second system had the DC bus filter inductance split evenly between the positive and negative buses (PS2). The three phase distribution transformer steps down the three phase source voltage to 430Vac (RMS, line to line). The transformer is ungrounded; however, the transformer internal stray capacitance provides connection to ground (through Rsag, as shown in figure 1). The full bridge six pulse rectifier converts the 43OVac to 1OOOVdc. The DC distribution consists of two buses: a lOOOVdcbus and an 8OOVdc bus. The DUDC converter is a one quadrant chopper that steps the lOOOVdcdown to 8OOVdc. The three phase six pulse inverter operates under sinusoidal pulse width modulation (PWM) and switches at 4.5kHz. The inverter converts the 800Vdc to 430Vac. The platform loads used for this study arepurely resistive. As many systems require that loads must be fitted with electromagnetic interference (EMI) filters, a capacitive filter representing composite filter values is connected to ground through resistance Remi as shown. Power converters are Icnown to be sources of harmonic voltages. Six pulse rectifiers are expected to generate common mode voltage harmonics on the load side at odd triplens of the Remi inverters can be expected to generate voltage harmonics on the load side at frequencies: (k(mf)*n)f,, for integers Rn, where fo is the fundamental output frequency (60Hz) and mJ=fJfo is the frequency modulation ratio (f , is the switching frequency, 4500Hz for this study). III. COMMON MODE ANALYSIS OF THE SYSTEM load cap. to 0.1-10 ufd The converters act as common mode voltage sources at certain harmonic frequencies. Current flow will result based on the path impedance at the excited frequencies. The most direct way to model the common mode path is to model the converters 0-7803-6420-1/00/$10.M) (c) 2000 IEEE 2544 as applying voltage from their tied input leads to their tied output leads. Specific component values used in this study are given in Table 1. Note that the load capacitance to ground is a function of the specific loads connected, and can be expected to vary over a wide range as this load varies. The system was modeled using Pspice with both dc link filter inductors located on the positive converter output leads. Figure 2 shows ground current levels predicted for various levels of load emi filter capacitance. Current flow is shown in each of four ground path elements (Rsag represents the stray path to the transformer, Remi the stray load path, and Cdcl and Cdc2 stray capacitance of dc cables 1 and 2). The worst case occurs with load capacitance at 0.7 microfarads, where the analysis predicts systemresonance at 8830Hz. This value is close to both 8820 and 9180 hertz, which are inverter common mode excitation frequencies (2fw&3f0). Table 2 shows the frequencies present in the various ground current with effective emi filter capacitance of 0.7 microfarads. Table 2: Harmonic Current through Ground Path Elements As shown in Table 2, this particular resonance involves the transformer stray czipacitance and the emi filter capacitance of the load. IV. GROUND CURRENT LIMITS Existing standards discuss limits on the ground currents for military applications. Two particular standards apply-- MIL-STD 1399 Section 300A [ lland MIL-STD-416E [2]. MIL-STD 1399 Section 300A, section 5.1.3 applies a limit of 20 amps ms to hull currents on the ship. MIL-STD-416E notes that supplies which are alternator fed limit interference through the application of the harmonic limits in MIL- STD 1399 Section 300A (3% single harmonic Conducted voltage, 5% voltage THD). susceptibility limit CS109 in 461E contains limits I IPSI: RMS emund Current vs. EM1 Capacitance 120 I - a c t 0.075 0.2 0.85 0.7 1 1.2 2 4 6 B 10 -% Cdc2 Capacitance (uF) -~~ _ _ --.- Figure 2 RMS ground current vs. load emi filtercapacitance for hull currents, but application of CS109 is limited, and must be considered to be overly restrictive for general use. Table 2: CS109 limits, MIL-STD-461E: Conducted Susceptibility, Structure Current, 60 Hzto100kHz Frequency (Hz) (1620 14500 18820 19180 112000 Current (A) 10.8506 10.638 10.4145 10.3998 10.3017 In any case, the levels predicted in the previous section are objectionable and must be reduced. V. GROUND CURRENT REDUCTION One potential method to reduce ground current levels is to split the dc link filter inductors evenly between the positive and negative bus. This will reduce the primary system resonant frequency below the switching frequency of the inverter. The simulation, however, showed that the rectifier harmonics can be excited with this configuration. Predicted ground current flows are shown in Figure 3. In this figure, the harmonics (h3, h9, etc.), are odd triplen harmonics of the source 0-7803-6420- 1 /OO/$lO.OO (c) 2000 IEEE 2545 frequency. Figure 3 shows current levels which are substantially reduced from the highest levels possible with the previous configuration. Figure 3 shows that six different resonant frequencies will be excited over the expected range of load capacitance. While the systemnow does not exceed the 20 amp limit of MIL-STD 1399, othier sources of ground current will also be present on the system. Also, these levels are above the more stringent CS109 limit of MIL- STD 461. For these reasons, further reductions should be considered. VI. INVERTER METHODS 3. Filter the common mode quantities at the source so that they do not enter the system. The inverter common mode voltage generation can be reduced through alternate modulation strategies or by alternate circuitry, as discussed elsewhere[3,4,5]. These methods provide reduced voltage at some cost. The second possibility- increased path impedance-- can theoretically be accomplished by avoiding resonance or by introducing resistance into the ground path. Either of these methods have their problems-intentional ground resistance can lead to safety issues, and it is -difficult to avoid all resonances when the converter switching frequency and filter parameters are subject to change, and the load capacitance I Common Mode Harmonic Current vs. EM1 Capacitance 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 s 1.5 1 -I - h33 *h39 +h45 - h51 0 5 0 0.1 0.15 0.23 0.35 0.42 0.55 0.7 1 1.4 3 5 6.5 8 10 Capacitance(uF) Figure 3: Common mode harmonic current in IPS2 across a range of system topologies changes over a wide range with loading conditions. The third alternative is to include common mode filtering on the inverter. Figure 4 shows a passive filter configuration which provides both common mode and differential mode filtering. The inverter output filter neutral is tied back to the midpoint of the inverter input capacitor to provide a common mode path for the filter. 61 order to reduce common mode harmonic 1r:vels caused by the inverter, there are a limited number of choices: 1. Reduce the amount of common mode 2. hcrease theimpedance of the ground path voltage being generated. so that less ground path current flows. 0-7803-6420-1/00/$10.00 (c) 2000 IEEE 2546 Three Phase Inverter Filter -' 800Vdc Bus To chopper - - Platform Loads with EM1 filter 1, - 2. - - Figure 4: Modified filter design for inverter ==go +fww.b, This filter design was analyzed using the same filter components as the previous differential mode filter, which employed an ungrounded wye connection. The effect of this filter configuration was studied with both of the previous dc link filter topologies previously studied. The results of this study are shown in Figure 5. This filter configuration does reduce ground path currents for both systems. Figure 5A shows that the filter is able to avoid exciting the strong resonance exhibited when the dc filter inductances are located on the positive bus, Figure 5B shows that the inverter output filter is also effective in reducing the ground current flow when the dc link filters inductances are split. 0.2 0.4 0.7 1 1.5 2 4 6 8 10 Cspacltsnce (un The study suggests that it is feasible to implement common mode filtering through a modification of the differential mode filter which is required for voltage quality. While the basic component values may be similar to those in a differential mode filter, the common mode currents will cause some level of increased cost. VII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The work presented here has shown that common mode currents can be a problem in power distribution systems utilizing electronic power converters. High levels of common modecurrent circulating through the system are possible, and can be a source of significant Comparleon ol RMS Ground Curmnl YI. MI Capacitance for IPS1 and IPS3 I '"1 ---1 I l " / I o w l I \ I I I 1 2 0 I I Figure5 Ground current attenuation in both systems by new filter design electromagnetic -interference. Excessive levels can occurs when one of the converters excites a system resonance. As a typical system can be expected to have multiple resonance points which will migrate with system confiugation and loading, it is deemed impractical to avoid ground loop flows by selecting switching frequencies which avoid exciting system resonances. This study suggests that there is a need for specification of the common mode output voltage level for electronic power converters used in general power system applications. This work has shown that the inverter, in particular, can be a source of significant common mode current. REFERENCES 1. MILSTD- 1399 Section300. Interface Standard for Shipboard Systems. Section 300A, 0-7803-6420-1/00/$10.00 (c) 2000 IdEE 2547 Electric Power, Alternating Current. United States Department of the Navy. 2. MIL-STD-461E. Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment. 3. A. von Juanne, H. Zhang, and A. Wallace. An Evaluation of Mitigation Techniques for Bearing Currents, EMI, and Overvoltages in ASD Applications, Vol. 34, No. 5 (S/O 1998): pp. 11 13-1 122. 4. S. Chen and T. Lipo. Bearing Currents and Shaft Voltages of an Induction Motor under Hard- and Soft-Switching Inverter Excitation, JEEE Transactions On Industry Applications, Vol. 34, NO. 5 (WO 1998): pp. 1042-1048. 5. M. Cacciato, A. Consoli, G. Scarcella, and A. Testa. Reduction of Common-Mode CLirrents in PWM Inverter Motor Drives, lEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 35, No. 2 (MA 1999): pp. 469475. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Ofice of Naval Research for this project. They would also like to acknowledge the efforts of Hasnain Merchant and Shanks Nmbi in preliminary phases of this study. 0-7803-6420-1/00/$10.00 (c) 2000 IEEE 2548