0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
23 vizualizări4 pagini
1) Cheaper cellphones in Canada resulting from increased foreign ownership of telecommunications companies would come at a high cost, including lost jobs, reduced technology leadership, and diminished distinct Canadian media.
2) Studies showing that Canadians pay high cellphone prices are flawed and exclude benefits like unlimited weekend calling that Canadians receive. When accounting for typical Canadian usage, prices rank 5th lowest out of OECD countries.
3) Increased competition from more carriers would not necessarily lower prices, as wireless infrastructure requires high startup costs, limiting the number of sustainable competitors in most markets.
Descriere originală:
Overview and breakdown on cellphone pricing in canada
1) Cheaper cellphones in Canada resulting from increased foreign ownership of telecommunications companies would come at a high cost, including lost jobs, reduced technology leadership, and diminished distinct Canadian media.
2) Studies showing that Canadians pay high cellphone prices are flawed and exclude benefits like unlimited weekend calling that Canadians receive. When accounting for typical Canadian usage, prices rank 5th lowest out of OECD countries.
3) Increased competition from more carriers would not necessarily lower prices, as wireless infrastructure requires high startup costs, limiting the number of sustainable competitors in most markets.
1) Cheaper cellphones in Canada resulting from increased foreign ownership of telecommunications companies would come at a high cost, including lost jobs, reduced technology leadership, and diminished distinct Canadian media.
2) Studies showing that Canadians pay high cellphone prices are flawed and exclude benefits like unlimited weekend calling that Canadians receive. When accounting for typical Canadian usage, prices rank 5th lowest out of OECD countries.
3) Increased competition from more carriers would not necessarily lower prices, as wireless infrastructure requires high startup costs, limiting the number of sustainable competitors in most markets.
for Canada Dave Coles, Tuesday November 23, 2010 Cheaper cellphones would be the consumer-beware loss leader if the Conservative government goes ahead with plans to sell out Canadas foreign ownership laws in the telecommunications and media sectors. Jobs, our position as a technology leader, and our distinct Canadian media voice are the hidden costs. And though cheaper wireless service could be a big selling feature of a Conservative bill expected to be introduced by next spring, there is something many Canadians dont know, and are not likely to hear from any member of the arper government! Canadians do not pay more for their cellphone service than consumers in most other countries. "or one thing, the widely #uoted $%C& study that consistently ranks Canadas cellphone services among the priciest of its member countries is seriously 'awed. (t compares very di)erent plans, including *(+-only cards for some countries and post-paid subscriptions in others. (t excludes some signi,cant perks that can be found in current Canadian subscriptions, such as unlimited night and weekend calling, which %uropean countries generally dont o)er. And most importantly, the choice of the -basket of services. used by the $%C& includes only //0 minutes of talk and about 12 text messages per month. 3he Canadian average is about 452 minutes of outgoing talk 6or 122 minutes for both incoming and outgoing7 and 522 text messages. 8hen applying the Canadian average 9 452 minutes of talk, 522 text messages and ,ve multimedia text messages per month 9 Canada ranks ,fth out of 5: $%C& countries 6excluding *outh ;orea7 in terms of prices %ven if Canadian pricing was way out of whack, creating more competition wouldnt help. 8hen it comes to telecommunications, the link between the number of companies and the level of pricing is very tenuous. Consider that Canada already has the most mobile network operators in the $%C&, after the <nited *tates. 8ith nine companies 6=ogers, >ell, 3elus, *ask3el, +3* Allstream, ?ideotron, @ublic +obile, 8(A&, +obilicity7 and two more soon to launch 6*haw and %astlink7. >esides @oland and Japan, no other $%C& country has more than four competitors. 3his includes the few countries, such as *weden and "inland, which have similar or lower prices than Canada. 8ireless is a natural monopoly because of high start-up costs 9 mainly the network infrastructure set-up. 3hose costs explain why there are only two to four companies holding onto a total B1 per cent to :2 per cent market share in most $%C& countries. 8ith more foreign investment, in the current regulatory framework, new entrants will likely do one of three things! C +erge to form a larger entity or consortium to provide a true national service. (n other words, a foreign company such as A3D3 or ?odafone would probably take over a current Canadian company rather than develop a full infrastructure parallel to the existing ones. C >e bought out by a larger company 9 as was the case with "ido and Clearnet. C Eo bankrupt because of inability to compete. 3hough prices wont be going down with more foreign competition, Canadian Fobs and Canadas position as a technology leader in this sector will be. 3housands of networking, switching, =D&, head oGce and support services Fobs will go south or o)shore. And the result of having foreign companies buying up chunks of our wireless spectrum 9 there is very limited wireless spectrum for the new generation of smart phones 9 means we could #uickly fall behind in technology instead of being on the leading edge as we are today. "inally, it is impossible to let foreigners own telecom and cable 3? without exposing our broadcast and media sectors to the same fate. >oth industries are deeply integrated and cannot be legislated and regulated independently from each other. 3he four largest private television networks in Canada belong to a telecommunications company! C3? to >ellH>C%, Elobal to *haw, C(3I to =ogers and Juebecs 3?A to ?ideotronHJuebecor. 3hese companies need to stay in Canadian hands. 3he ability to tell our own stories, listen to our own music and have a distinct Canadian point of view is well worth ,ghting for. +uch more so than the empty promise of a cheap cellphone.