H. Karabulut* 1 , H. S. Yucesu 1 , C. Cinar 1 and Fatih Aksoy 2 This study is concerned with the construction of a simple solar energy conversion system consisting of a parabolic dish concentrator and a Stirling engine. For this purpose, a parabolic dish concentrator consisting of planar mirror segments was built and coupled with a Stirling engine recently developed by the authors for solar energy conversion and domestic cogeneration. By mounting the engine to the bottom of the dish concentrator, the solar rays were directly reflected onto the hot end of the displacer cylinder. For the design of an appropriate parabolic dish concentrator reflecting solar rays onto the hot zone of a displacer cylinder and satisfying their uniform distribution, an equation was derived. The energy conversion unit constructed was tested under 820 W m 22 solar radiation. The engine started to run at 93uC hot end temperature. At steady running conditions, the hot end temperature of the displacer cylinder became stable at y156uC. The variation of shaft power with engine speed and charge pressure was evaluated. The engine produced a maximum shaft power of 23?59 W at 344 rev min 21 engine speed and 2 bar helium charge pressure. Keywords: Solar energy, Parabolic dish, Stirling engine List of symbols f Focal length of standard parabola (m) h o Distance between dish bottom and illumi- nated zone of cylinder (m) LPG Liquefied petroleum gas LTD Low temperature differential Q f Heat transferred to the working fluid of the engine (J) Q s Radiation coming from dish (J) Q w Heat transferred to the rest of the displacer cylinder by conduction (J) Q
Energy lost to surrounding medium (J)
R Aperture diameter (m) T H Hot end temperature of displacer cylinder (K) T L Cold end temperature of displacer cylinder (K) x Horizontal element of coordinate system (m) z Vertical element of coordinate system (m) W b Shaft work per cycle (J) W i Inner work per cycle (J) g b Brake thermal efficiency W b /Q f g c Carnot efficiency (T H 2T L )/T H g i Inner thermal efficiency W i /Q f Introduction The dish/engine technology is one of the oldest solar energy conversion technologies, dating back to the 1800s when a number of companies demonstrated solar powered systems based on Rankine steam engine, Ericsson and Stirling engines. 1,2 The dish/Stirling systems consist principally of a parabolic dish concentrator, a receiver and a Stirling engine coupled with an electrical generator. The para- bolic dish concentrator reects the sun radiation to the receiver. The receiver intercepts the concentrated radia- tion and converts to heat in its cavity. The heat generated in the cavity is transferred to the engine either directly or indirectly via a phase changing uid. 3,4 The parabolic dish concentrators were built by means of alignment of planar or spherical mirror segments onto a parabolic dish dened by z5x 2 /4f. 5,6 For the alignment of segments, several methods were devised before 1992 and reviewed by Diver. 7 The optical efciency of parabolic dish concentrators built in this manner was described as the product of mirror reectivity, mirror cleanliness and receiver interception, and values up to 85% were reported. 8,9 Stirling engines used in dish/Stirling systems are high temperature (above 700uC) and high pressure engines (up to 200 bar) using hydrogen or helium as working uid. After 1970, in order to develop the dish/Stirling technology, lots of projects were conducted by commer- cial institutions and academic researchers. In 1978, Gupta et al. developed 1 and 1?9 kW solar powered reciprocating engines for rural applications. 10 The engines provided 5?5 and 5?7% thermal efciencies and 1 Department of Mechanical Technology, Faculty of Technical Education, Gazi University, Teknikokullar, Ankara 06500, Turkey 2 Department of Mechanical Technology, Faculty of Technical Education, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon 03100, Turkey *Corresponding author, email halitk@gazi.edu.tr 228 2009 Energy Institute Published by Maney on behalf of the Institute Received 17 October 2008; accepted 5 February 2009 DOI 10.1179/014426009X12448189963513 Journal of the Energy Institute 2009 VOL 82 NO 4 2% overall efciency. In 1980, Fujita et al. conducted an experimental study to compare performances of three different dish/engine power systems. 4 One of these engines used was a Stirling engine while the others were gas turbines. One of these gas turbines was working with the Brayton cycle and the other was working with the Brayton/Rankine combined cycle. The Stirling engine used had a kinematic design developed by United Stirling of Sweden. The tests indicated that Stirling engine achieved higher efciencies at lower temperatures (below 950uC); however, at higher temperatures, the Brayton/Rankine cycle gas turbines achieved higher efciency than the Stirling engine. The US Department of Energy made an experimental evaluation of the dish/Stirling systems built with using a kinematic engine of United Stirling of Sweden. The experimental data were obtained in the Jet Propulsion Laboratory of California Institute of Technology and evaluated by Selcuk in 1985. 11 Some overall efciencies of up to 35%, from sun light to electricity, were reported. Cummins Power Generation Inc. and Sandia National Laboratory conducted a dish/Stirling develop- ment project for a 3K year period starting from September 1991. The programme was sponsored by the US Department of Energy. In the dish/Stirling system developed, a free piston Stirling engine, a liquid metal heat pipe receiver and stretched membrane concentrators were used. The maximum electricity power and overall efciency, from sun light to electri- city, were 7?5 kW and 28% respectively. 12 In a solar energy project started by Shaltens et al. in 1992, sponsored by the US Department of Energy and organised by NASA Lewis Research Center, two different free piston Stirling engines, manufactured by Cummins Motor Company and Stirling Technology Company, were tested. 13 As the experimental facility, a sodium heat pipe receiver was used. The solar energy systems built provided overall efciencies reaching to 32 and 30?7% respectively. In the EnviroDish project, a 10 kW dish/Stirling system was developed by the Deutsches Zentrum fu r Luft und Raumfahrt and Schlaich Bergermann und Partner. In this system, an alpha type kinematic engine (SOLO V161), externally heated by concentrated solar radiation, was used. The system provided 11?1 kW electricity power and 21?6% net solar to electricity efciency. 14,15 This study is concerned with the design and construc- tion of a parabolic dish concentrator and its integration with an engine manufactured by the authors recently for solar energy and domestic cogeneration studies. Technical properties and performance characteristics of this engine, obtained with air testing using a LPG ame as heat source, were recently presented by the authors. 16 The engine was mounted to the bottom of a parabolic collector and the solar rays were directly reected onto the hot end of the displacer cylinder. As working uid, helium was used. Properties of dish and engine In the solar energy system to be constructed, the use of a point focusing parabolic dish may cause some extreme thermal stresses on the displacer cylinder and damage the engine. A dish appropriate for this study should reect solar rays onto a zone of the displacer cylinder. The equation dz dx ~tg p 4 z 1 2 arctg z x { h 0 x { l R
describes an appropriate dish prole. Figure 1 illustrates a dish prole designed with 1?7 m aperture diameter and drawn at real scales. Solar rays are reected onto an interval of z ranging from 25 to 35 cm. Figure 2 illustrates assembly of the engine and dish reector established of planar mirror segments by means of aligning them onto a dish made of breglass. A certain degree of diversity was unavoidable between theoretical design and practical construction. The engine used is a kinematic engine developed for solar energy and domestic cogeneration. 16 Figure 3 illustrates a photograph of the engine. Its external shape was specically designed appropriate for coupling with a parabolic dish. Figure 4 illustrates a power and torque curve of the engine obtained at 4 bar helium charge pressure and 300uC hot end temperature by heating the engines hot end with LPG burner. The convective heat transfer coefcient at inner surfaces of the engine was predicted as 650 W m 22 K 21 for helium by comparing the maximum shaft power (180 W) with theoretically calculated power using the nodal analysis. 16,17 Using the maximum shaft power and the heat input calculated by nodal analysis, the ratio of brake thermal efciency to Carnot efciency was determined as 60?3%. The other properties of the engine are given by Karabulut et al. 16 Experimental facilities and measurement procedure The torque of the engine was measured by exerting a Prony type mobile dynamometer on the ywheel of the engine. The speed of the engine was measured by a digital tachometer, ENDA ETS1410, with 1 rev min 21 accuracy. Temperatures were measured with a non- contact infrared thermometer, DT-8859. The charge pressure was measured with a bourdon tube pressure gauge with 0?1 bar accuracy and 010 bar measurement range. The density of sun radiation was measured by a pyranometer. The working uid pressure was initially set to a desired value and the engine was run. After a period of 1 Exact prole of dish Karabulut et al. Construction and testing of a dish/Stirling solar energy unit Journal of the Energy Institute 2009 VOL 82 NO 4 229 time, the hot end temperature of the engine reached to a stable state. Then, by exerting different loads, the speed was determined. When a new load was exerted, however, the speed required a time period to settle. To ensure reliability of the obtained data, stable speeds were waited. After obtaining an adequate number of data pairs, the operations were progressed to the subsequent pressure stage. Results and discussions The energy conversion system constructed was tested under 820 W m 22 sun radiations in mid of September. The engine started to run at 93uC hot end temperature. At steady working conditions, the temperature distribu- tion of the displacer cylinder was measured and illustrated in Fig. 5. The variations of shaft power and torque with speed are illustrated in Figs. 6 and 7 respectively. The engine provided 23?59 W maximum 3 Photograph of test engine 4 Variation of power and torque with engine speed 2 Photograph of energy system 5 Temperature distribution on cylinder Karabulut et al. Construction and testing of a dish/Stirling solar energy unit 230 Journal of the Energy Institute 2009 VOL 82 NO 4 shaft power at 2 bar helium charge pressure and 344 rev min 21 speed as seen in Fig. 6. This shaft power corresponds to a 4?12 J shaft work W b per cycle. By means of introducing the temperature distribution seen in Fig. 5 into the nodal analysis program described by Karabulut et al., the inner work generation W i per cycle was predicted as 5?49 J for 650 W m 22 K 21 convective heat transfer coefcient at the inner surface. 18 The difference between the shaft work and inner work may be attributed to the mechanical losses. The good agreement between the shaft work and inner work also conrms the validity of nodal analysis program and thermophysical values used. A shaft power of 23?59 J is much lower than in practical utility. In order to reach to a conclusion of whether the system can be developed or not, one should know where the energy reected by the dish goes to. Its determination by measurement was not easy. Therefore, semitheoretical approximations were made. For this purpose, the energy balance of the illuminated zone of the displacer cylinder was used as Q s {Q ? ~Q f zQ w The quantities on the left side of this equation are radiation coming from dish and energy lost to surround- ing medium. The quantities on the right are the heat transferred to the working uid of the engine and the heat transferred to the rest of the displacer cylinder by conduction. Using the nodal analysis program, the heat trans- ferred to the working uid through the surface inside the illuminated zone Q f was calculated as 27?5 J per cycle. The heat transferred by conduction to the remainder of displacer cylinder Q w was determined using the Fourier relation of conduction as 2?5 J per cycle. Substitution of these values into the energy balance results in Q s {Q ? ~30 Considering a 50% reection efciency (rate of radiation reected to the engine/rate of radiation incoming to the dish) for dish concentrator, Q s was estimated as 143 J per cycle. By substituting this value into the last equation, Q
was estimated as 113 J per cycle. As a
result, the brake thermal efciency g b and inner thermal efciency g i of the engine were determined as 15 and 20% respectively, which can be regarded as pretty good. Under the same temperature limits seen in Fig. 5 (T H 5429 K, T L 5300 K), the internal Carnot efciency g c of the engine is 30%. The ratio of brake thermal efciency to Carnot efciency was found to be 50%. As mentioned above, the same ratio was 60?3%. This indicates that 2 bar charge pressure is slightly lower than the optimum charge pressure of working uid for 156uC hot end and 27uC cold end temperatures. Examination of torque and power curves obtained for 1?2 and 2 bar charge pressures (Figs. 6 and 7) indicates the same situation. Therefore, y5 W increase in shaft power may be expected. The overall conversion ef- ciency of the system (shaft work obtained/radiation used) is y1?7%. Under similar testing conditions, the four piston LTD engine constructed by Kongtragool and Wongwises produced 6 W shaft power and 0?44% brake thermal efciency, where the radiation was supplied by a halogen lamp instead of using sun radiation. 19 Q
calculated above is 79% of the sun radiation
reected to the displacer cylinder by dish concentrator. A signicant part of Q
may be the energy lost to
surrounding medium by re-reection due to the low absorption property of ASTM steel from which the displacer cylinder was manufactured. By ceramic coat- ing, its absorption property may be improved and re- reection may be partially avoided. The convective heat loss from the surface of the displacer cylinder may also be minimised by means of using a glass cover. To avoid re-reection of sun radiation focused onto the hot end of the displacer cylinder and other losses with thermal radiation and convection, the most efcient solution seems to be focusing the radiation into a cavity attached to the top of displacer cylinder. To reect the solar radiation into a cavity grooved at the top of cylinder, a double reection mechanism may be constructed alike seen in Fig. 8. To increase reection efciency of the dish, it may be manufactured as a single part from a reective material or from smaller mirror segments as made in the past. 7 Conclusion A dish/Stirling solar energy conversion system was constructed and tested under 820 W m 22 solar radia- tions. The hot end temperature of the engine was measured as 156uC. The engine provided a 23?59 W shaft power with helium as working uid which can be regarded as a pretty good performance with regard to 156uC hot end temperature, but lower than the expected. Heat losses with thermal radiation and convection and re-reection of some solar radiation restricted the hot 6 Variation of output power with engine speed 7 Variation of torque with engine speed Karabulut et al. Construction and testing of a dish/Stirling solar energy unit Journal of the Energy Institute 2009 VOL 82 NO 4 231 end temperature and consequently the power genera- tion. The present performance of the system was found to be too low when compared to dish/Stirling conversion systems with the sodium heat pipe. However, it has potential for development. Focusing the sun radiation into a cavity attached to the top of displacer cylinder may be the most efcient strategy for the development process. Acknowledgements This study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) in frame of the project code of 105M256. As researchers, the authors thank the TUBITAK. References 1. G. Walker: Stirling engines; 1980, Oxford, Clarendon Press. 2. B. Kongtragool and S. Wongwises: A review of solar- powered Stirling engines and low temperature differential Stirling engines, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2003, 7, 131 154. 3. T. Tsoutsos, V. Gekas and K. Marketaki: Technical and economical evaluation of solar thermal power generation, Renew. Energy, 2003, 28, 873886. 4. T. Fujita, J. M. Bowyer and B. C. Gajanana: Comparison of advanced engines for parabolic dish solar thermal power plants, Proc. 15th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conf., Seattle, WA, USA, August 1980, SAE, 14741482. 5. C. E. Andraka, D. A. Wolf and R. B. Diver: Design fabrication and testing of a 30 kW screen-wick heat-pipe solar receiver, Proc. 27th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conf., San Diego, CA, USA, August 1992, SAE, 185190. 6. D. R. Adkins and K. S. Rawlinson: Design fabrication and testing of a 15 kW gas-fired liquid-metal evaporator, Proc. 27th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conf., San Diego, CA, USA, SAE, 191199. 7. R. B. Diver: Mirror alignment techniques for point-focus solar concentrators, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1992. 8. K. Lovegrove, A. Zawadski and J. Coventy: Paraboloidol dish solar concentrators for multi-magawatt power generation, Proc. ISES Solar World Cong., Beijing, China, September 2007, ISES. 9. N. D. Kaushika and K. S. Reddy: Performance of a low cost paraboloidal dish steam generating system, Energy Convers. Manage., 2000, 41, 713726. 10. R. K. Gupta, A. M. Deshpande and K. M. Brave: Development of 1 kW solar powered reciprocating engine for rural applications, Proc. Int. Solar Energy Cong., New Delhi, India, January 1978, Solar Energy Society of India, 20162020. 11. M. K. Selcuk: DishStirling module performance as evaluated from tests of various test bed concentrator/Stirling engine config- urations, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA, 1985. 12. J. R. Bean and R. B. Diver: The CPG 5-kW dishStirling develop- ment program, Proc. 27th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conf., San Diego, CA, USA, August 1992, SAE, 221228. 13. R. K. Shaltens, J. G. Schreiber and W. A. Wong: Update on the advanced Stirling conversion system project for 25 kW dish Stirling application, Proc. 27th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conf., San Diego, CA, USA, August 1992, SAE, 229235. 14. F. Nepveu, A. Ferriere and F. Bataille: Thermal model of a dish/ Stirling systems, Sol. Energy, 2009, 83, 8189. 15. T. Keck, P. Heller and W. Reinalter: Eurodish-continuous operation, system improvement and reference units, Proc. 13th SolarPACES Int. Symp., Seville, Spain, June 2006, SolarPACES, 18. 16. H. Karabulut, H. S. Yu cesu, C. Cinar and F. Aksoy: An experimental study on the development of a b-type Stirling engine for low and moderate temperature heat sources, Appl. Energy, 2009, 86, 68273. 17. H. Karabulut, H. S. Yucesu and C. C nar: Nodal analysis of a Stirling engine with concentric piston and displacer, Renew. Energy, 2006, 31, 218822197. 18. H. Karabulut, F. Aksoy and E. Ozturk: Thermodynamic analysis of a beta type Stirling engine with a displacer driving mechanism by means of a lever, Renew. Energy, 2009, 34, 2022208. 19. B. Kongtragool and S. Wongwises: A four power-piston low- temperature differential Stirling engine using simulated solar energy as a heat source, Sol. Energy, 2008, 82, 4932500. 8 Concept of simple dish/Stirling system Karabulut et al. Construction and testing of a dish/Stirling solar energy unit 232 Journal of the Energy Institute 2009 VOL 82 NO 4
Incineration of Municipal Waste: Specialized Seminars on Incinerator Emissions of Heavy Metals and Particulates, Copenhagen, 18–19 September 1985 and Emission of Trace Organics from Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators, Copenhagen, 20–22 January 1987
Uncrewed Vehicle: Emerging technologies for uncrewed aircraft, vehicles, submarines, and boats to swarm together and make decisions in peace and war without the need for human interaction