0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
53 vizualizări19 pagini
Business processes are key to successful implementation of Strategic Asset Management. Implementing SAM requires the involvement of key individuals from production, engineering, Logistics and Senior Management as well as maintenance. The processes typically break-down at the intersections between the various "stovepipe" organizations.
Business processes are key to successful implementation of Strategic Asset Management. Implementing SAM requires the involvement of key individuals from production, engineering, Logistics and Senior Management as well as maintenance. The processes typically break-down at the intersections between the various "stovepipe" organizations.
Business processes are key to successful implementation of Strategic Asset Management. Implementing SAM requires the involvement of key individuals from production, engineering, Logistics and Senior Management as well as maintenance. The processes typically break-down at the intersections between the various "stovepipe" organizations.
The business processes required to implement Strategic Asset Management (SAM). James W. Davis, PE, Vice President Strategic Asset Management Inc Voice: 610-861-7472 E-mail: jdavis@samicorp.com INTRODUCTION In the last few years many companies have begun to realize the importance of Strategic Asset Management (SAM) as an enterprise strategy that, properly implemented, will improve financial performance. Typical results of an effective Strategic Plan for Asset Management include a 20% - 50% reduction in maintenance cost accompanied by a 15% - 20% increase in real capacity, with no capital investment in production equipment. The tangible results include a significant increase in profitability accompanied by a dramatic reduction in unit cost. One of the key concepts required for successful development and implementation of SAM is the concept of Business Processes. The SAM Business Processes are used to define and measure the means by which we implement the best practices that lead to significant, sustainable financial performance improvement. The Business Processes of SAM are cross-functional as shown in Figure 1. This means that developing and implementing SAM requires the involvement of key individuals fromProduction, Engineering, Logistics and Senior Management as well as Maintenance. Many so-called Maintenance Improvement programs have failed to achieve sustainable results when we have failed to recognize this critical aspect. The processes typically break-down at the intersections between the various stovepipe organizations. These organizations often are focused on strategies and objectives that are conflicting and competitive in nature. The operations organization is so intent on running that they push the maintenance organization to make quick fixes rather than to effect appropriate, lasting repairs. Engineering is tasked with reducing capital expense and controlling construction time rather than considering reliability, availability, maintainability (RAM) and life cycle costs when designing and constructing new facilities. Procurement is rewarded for acquiring parts and materials at least cost, often resultingin substandard items that have a negative impact on overall cost. The Vice President of Southern Area Manufacturing for Saudi ARAMCO admonished me that, in our plant, the Production and Maintenance organizations were too friendly. In his words we were In bed together. He viewed this as an unhealthy relationship and said that he believed there must be a certain level of animosity between these two groups in order for Operations to push Maintenance to meet their needs. Our performance record eventually proved that the old dinosaur was wrong, but we took a lot of heat for awhile. C a p a c i t y
P l a n
&
M a n a g e A s s e t
H e a l t h c a r e L o g i s t i c s
M a n a g e m e n t P r o d u c t i o n
M a n a g e m e n t Asset Management Processes" Asset Management Processes" Figure 1: Business Processes of SAM James Davis Page 2 Studies have shown that among industrial companies in North America: The average Maintenance wrench time (hands-on work) is less than 30%. The typical level of Preventable Maintenance (repairs that could have been avoide by better process) is approximately 70% The norm for Asset Utilization (level of on spec production) is averaging 65%. These issues point to the need for designing appropriate integrated Business Processes to insure that we manage our critical assets to the optimum capability. WHAT IS SAM SAM is an aggressive vision of the future and a related three to five year operational strategy. Key roles are identified and defined in each element of the strategy. Performance standards are established for critical Business Processes. Key performance indicators (KPIs) and standard definitions are in place and used for decision making. An effective change management plan is developed and documented. An integrated set of Business processes is designed and implemented to establish a standard of performance including a plan for achieving the standard and realizing benefits. The Strategy is a cross functional tool that identifies roles and expectations for all elements of the Asset Management Processes. It becomes a prioritizing device that causes us to attack first things first. It enables us to develop a thrust of commonality across the enterprise. In a recently published paper titled The Future of Asset Management Brad Peterson, President of SAMI, stated, This article explores a broader vision for asset management than has been previously articulated and brands this vision Strategic Asset Management (SAM). Based on successful experience with our clients, SAM is an integrated set of processes that systematically derive the highest value from plant assets, through a consistent philosophy, plans and objectives, and cooperative involvement by everyone in the plant. SAM represents a higher level of performance than is currently practiced or even recognized by the manufacturing community today. Any useful model to guide action will have several characteristics: Simplicity: All of the greatest ideas are simple in concept. If not kept simple, they are not fully understood or remembered, and fail as guiding principles. Intuitive: Readers should be able to understand the underlying principles without guidance. Utility: The model should work consistently in application. Completeness: All necessary elements of success should be contained. Our experience with the SAM model indicates these criteria are met. However, you as the reader will need to make your own judgments. We will explore the SAM Model and its applications in detail in a subsequent paper. Figure 2: The SAM Model James Davis Page 3 WHY CONSIDER DESIGNED PROCESSES An associate, Dr. Carol Vesier, once said to me, Business Processes always exist. However, in most cases, management doesnt know what they are. We came to refer to these as Virtual Processes. They are in use throughout your facilities, usually in several varying versions, but they are not well defined and often create issues and conflicts. Employees are free to adjust them or even create new ones as required to do their assignments as they understand them. A good example of a Virtual Process occurs when Employee Joe has a problem with his computer but is unable to get support from the IT Department for whatever reason. Joe happens to know that Brenda, another Maintenance Employee is good with PCs, so he gives her a call and she comes over to solve his problem. After all, they have to get t heir jobs done in spite of management.
Mark Buchanan said in an article in The New Scientist, employees muck up or ignore about one out of every four or five commands that come down from their bosses - its a universal principle. This implies that a Senior Vice President can expect employees on the shop floor to implement about 25% - 30% of his standards. The graphic in Figure 3 shows how it works. The typical plant environment in the absence of well-defined, integrated processes goes something like; Business is triggered by a need. >> Something happens (transfer of information) >> Work is accomplished by someone >> Some Procedure is followed >> Informal network business process occurs (Who can help?) >> Results are evaluated >>>>>>>>> Good, bad, redo, try something else. The result is inefficiency at best and impending disaster at worst. In the absence of well-engineered business processes, employees are going to create their own in order to get through the day. Unfortunately, their limited view of the landscape often causes these ad hoc processes to be inadequate and even detrimental to the overall mission. A managing system where the core business processes are left to the imagination of employees frequently becomes a quid pro quo arrangement. Favors are traded and results are heavily dependant on the popularity and relationships of the employee. Because the Business Processes of SAM are nearly always cross-functional as is depicted in Figure 1, process failures often occur due to conflicting priorities and adversarial relationships between the various organizations.
Figure 3: Employee Implementation of Standards James Davis Page 4 BUSINESS PROCESS CONCEPTS In order to have effective business processes, The Six Sigma Way by Peter Pande tells us that we need to understand the components or characteristics required for defining a business process. The following diagram depicts these requirements.
The SIPOC model is defined as: Supplier - the person or group providing key information, materials, or other resource to the process Input - the thing provided Process - the set of steps that transforms - and ideally, adds value to - the Input Output - the final product of the process Customer - the person, group, or process that receives the output Process Measures and Service Requirements These consist of: A work flow diagram that models the process and identifies roles for each step in the process, and identifies interfaces to other processes Definitions of the roles and terms used in the process model Measures or performance indicators to measure the process Definition of the inputs / suppliers and Clear specification of output and service requirements In managing your business processes it is important to avoid the mushroom syndrome and to keep the customers informed. As an example, insure that the operations or production management dont feel like Maintenance Work Orders fall into a Black Hole once they are initiated. Establish effective reporting systems that provide the information needed to inform and inspire confidence in the customer of your Business Processes. Some examples in the Asset Healthcare arena might include: Work order backlog management Equipment with defects Service Requirements: What are the standards for how we interact with & treat customers? Output Requirements: What features or characteristics of our final product or service are key to customer satisfaction? Customers Outputs Inputs Process Suppliers Customer Interface Figure 4: SIPOC Model James Davis Page 5 PM/PdM completion Clearly list the expected results from each process and identify quality requirements and specifications. Specify delivery and turnover procedures for the customer of each process. Create and use measures to manage process output quality Some examples in Asset Healthcare and Logistics management may include:: Turnover completed repairs to production Accept new MRO equipment, parts, materials BUSINESS PROCESSES VS. BEST PRACTICES In many so-called Maintenance Excellence and other programs such as TPM and Lean Manufacturing, proponents focus on implementing best practices. This approach almost invariably fails to achieve dramatic improvements that are sustainable in the company culture. Best practices focus on the what we should be doing while Business Processes define how we will do our critical work. The Core Business Processes There are nine Core or high level Business Processes that are addressed in SAM. The following section provides an overview paragraph and two or three examples of each of these. Table 1 provides a partial list of the database that we have developed and used in implementing business processes in several industries The author has provided a detailed example of the Maintenance Work Management Process at Appendix I. Strategic Management Strategic Management processes define the way in which we establish and communicate the future of the company involving stakeholders at all levels within the organization. Strategy development and planning process Goal setting and tracking process Results measurement and process validation process Information Management Information Management incorporates all of the processes and tools that are used to store and retrieve information that is used to support decision making based on hard data. Repair tracking and reporting process Informations systems evaluation and selection process Reliability Management Equipment Criticality 4.1.1 Assigning Equipment Criticality 4.1.2 Revising Equipment Criticality Equipment Taxonomy Equipment Maintenance Strategies 4.3.1 Maintenance Strategy 4.3.2 Create Corporate Generic Maintenance Strategies 4.3.3 Revising Corporate Generic Maintenance Strategies 4.3.4 Applying a Maintenance Strategy to an Equipment Unit 4.3.5 Revising a Maintenance Strategy to an James Davis Page 6 Equipment Unit Standard Repair Procedures 4.4.1 Standard Maintenance Repair Plans Acceptance Testing 4.5.1 Identifying Special Acceptance Testing Equipment Condition Monitoring 4.6.1 Condition Monitoring 4.6.2 Define Condition Monitoring Tools for Equipment Failure Analysis and Response 4.7.0 Failure Analysis Core Process 4.7.1 Historical Data Analysis 4.7.2 Basic Failure Analysis 4.7.3 Advanced Failure Analysis 4.7.4 Implement Corrective Actions Total Equipment Ownership Cost 4.8.1 Life Cycle Costing.vsd 4.8.2 Applying Selection Criteria for Purchasing New Equipment Parts Management and Inventory Control 4.9.1 Parts Management 4.9.2 Reviewing Part Historical Data 4.9.3 Implement Vendor Stocking Programs Resource Management Applying Criticality 5.1.1 Applying Equipment Criticality Work Management (Reactive Maintenance) 5.2.0 Reactive Maintenance Core Process 5.2.1 Execute Emergency Work 5.2.2 Identify Contingency Work Work Management (Planning, Scheduling and Executing Work) 5.3.0 Maintenance Work Core Process 5.3.1 Identify Work 5.3.2 Plan Work 5.3.3 Schedule Work 5.3.4 Execute Work 5.3.5 Execute PM/PdM Work 5.3.6 Document Work 5.3.7 Backlog Management James Davis Page 7 5.3.8 Record Event Info Needed for Failure Analysis
Shutdown Management 5.5.0 Maintenance Shutdown Core Practice 5.5.1 Develop Shutdown Scope of Work 5.5.2 Create Preliminary Shutdown Schedule Table 1 Organization Management Organization Management involves establishing the Asset Management process management organization and defining the roles of personnel involved in working with the reliability and maintenance business processes in all organizations. It defines our Managing System business processes. Managing cross-functional processes process management organization Defining roles and responsibilities for processes Capacity and Capital Management Capacity Management processes address the methods by which we acquire or dispose capacity and manage capital investment. It includes all of the aspects of incorporating reliability, maintainability, and operability into the design and installation of new systems and equipment or modifications to existing. Reliability, Availability, Maintainability assessment of systems and equipment Life cycle cost assessment Capital equipment procurement data for reliability Production Management Production Management includes all of the processes necessary for establishing and maintaining proper process controls as well as those required for day to day management of the production process. This process includes critica l equipment operating procedures, quality management, environmental compliance, and more. Process quality assurance management Critical equipment start-up and shutdown-processes Environmental compliance assurance process Resource Management Resource Management includes all of the planning and supervision activities that go in to allocating manpower, materials, tools and contractors to the accomplishment of the day to day function of the manufacturing site. Daily work management Major work and capital projects Contractor and contract labor management Reliability Management Reliability Management involves the work processes and activities that focus on ensuring and enhancing reliability of the plants production assets, the manufacturing equipment. It includes proactive activities like preventive and predictive maintenance and analysis activities and record keeping. Creating and implementing maintenance strategies Equipment failure analysis and corrective action James Davis Page 8 Preventive and predictive maintenance processes and follow-up Logistics Management Logistics Management includes all of the planning and day to day management processes the manufacturing reliability mission and objectives. Storehouse management, procurement of supplies and parts, and vendor management are all elements of Logistics Management. Vendor evaluation and consolidation Crtical spare parts management Material quality assurance Change Management Change Management includes all of the work processes and activities required for communicating the SAM objectives to the workforce, to motivate them to take ownership of the SAM, to achieve success, and to maintain state of the art work processes. Craft reliability reward process SAM Key Performance Indicator tracking and results management SAM communication process Appendix one contains a sample set of Business Processes for the function of managing maintenance work. As an interesting exercise, see if you can identify the following characteristics for each process: Supplier Inputs Process As given. Outputs Customer KPI As you can see, it is not always easy to identify the specific characteristics for a given process. In my next article, we will address the Value Proposition for SAM.
References: Title Author Copyright Publisher The Future of Asset Management S Bradley Peterson 2003 Strategic Asset Management, Inc. Improving Profitability Through Reliability Carol Vesier, PhD 2001 RonaMax The Six Sigma Way Peter Pande et al 2000 McGraw-Hill Uptime: Strategies for Excellence John Dixon Campbell 1995 Productivity Press Article Mark Buchanan 1997 The New Scientist APPENDIX I - SAMPLE BUSINESS PROCESS WORK MANAGEMENT James Davis Page 1 5.3.0 Maintenance Work Core Process Rev: 4 Date: 02/20/02 Backlog Management Process - 5.3.7 Identify Work Process - 5.3.1 Plan Work Process - 5.3.2 Schedule Work Process - 5.3.3 Execute Work Process - 5.3.4 Document Work Process - 5.3.6 Execute PM/ PdM Work Process - 5.3.5
APPENDIX I - SAMPLE BUSINESS PROCESS WORK MANAGEMENT James Davis Page 2 Identify Work Item Create Work Request Anyone 5.3.1.1 Select Work Priority Anyone 5.3.1.2 Is this an emergency? Create Work Order Maintenance Planner 5.3.1.5 Is design change required? Capture Minimum Event Data Maintenance Planner 5.3.1.6 Plan Work Process - 5.3.2 5.3.1 Identify Work Rev: 4 Identify as Design Change Maintenance Planner 5.3.1.7 Reactive Maintenance Process Process - 5.2.0 Is this a failure event? Review Work Request Maintenance Planner 5.3.1.4 Review Work Request Shift Superintendent 5.3.1.3 Is this an emergency? Design Change Process Process - YES YES NO NO YES NO YES Date: 02/20/02 APPENDIX I - SAMPLE BUSINESS PROCESS WORK MANAGEMENT James Davis Page 3 5.3.2 Plan Work Rev: 4 Identify Work Process - 5.3.1 Is archived plan available? Define & Sequence Job Tasks Maintenance Planner 5.3.2.4 Define Resource Requirements Maintenance Planner 5.3.2.5 Review Job Plan Maintenance Planner 5.3.2.2 Is plan complete? Assemble Work Package Maintenance Planner 5.3.2.8 Schedule Work Process - 5.3.3 Revise Job Plan Maintenance Planner 5.3.2.3 Is material available? Initiate Procurement Maintenance Planner 5.3.2.6 YES YES NO Obtain Materials Buyer 5.3.2.7 Sort Work Orders By Priority Maintenance Planner 5.3.2.1 YES NO Date: 02/20/02 NO APPENDIX I - SAMPLE BUSINESS PROCESS WORK MANAGEMENT James Davis Page 4 Sort Planned Work Orders by Priority Maintenance Scheduler 5.3.3.1 Compare Available Resources With Requirements Maintenance Scheduler 5.3.3.2 Create Job Schedule Maintenance Scheduler 5.3.3.3 Review Job Schedule Planning & Scheduling Team 5.3.3.4 Did the schedule change? Issue Job Schedule Maintenance Scheduler 5.3.3.8 Execute Work Process - 5.3.4 5.3.3 Schedule Work Rev: 4 Review Planned Backlog Planning & Scheduling Team 5.3.3.5 Expedite resources? Expedite Resources Maintenance Planner 5.3.3.7 Revise Job Schedule Maintenance Scheduler 5.3.3.6 YES YES NO NO Plan Work Process - 5.3.2 Date: 02/20/02 Identify Contingency Work Process - 5.2.2 APPENDIX I - SAMPLE BUSINESS PROCESS WORK MANAGEMENT James Davis Page 5 Schedule Work Process - 5.3.3 Review Work Package Maintenance Supervisor 5.3.4.1 Receive Parts and Materials Craft Person 5.3.4.4 Obtain Work Permits Craft Person 5.3.4.6 Lock Out/Tag Out Work Area Craft Person 5.3.4.7 Execute Work Craft Person 5.3.4.8 Release to Operations Craft Person 5.3.4.9 Document Work Process - 5.3.6 5.3.4 Execute Work Rev: 4 Verify Resources Maintenance Supervisor 5.3.4.2 Assign Personnel Maintenance Supervisor 5.3.4.3 Send parts or core back to warehouse? Conduct Site Visit Craft Person 5.3.4.5 New defects? Should it be fixed now? Fix It Craft Person 5.3.4.11 Return Parts To Warehouse Craft Person 5.3.4.10 Identify Work Process - 5.3.1 YES YES NO Date: 02/20/02 Execute Emergency Work Process - 5.2.1 YES NO NO APPENDIX I - SAMPLE BUSINESS PROCESS WORK MANAGEMENT James Davis Page 6 Schedule Work Process - 5.3.3 Review PM/ PdM Work Order PM/ PdM Supervisor 5.3.5.1 Receive Equipment and or Tools PM/ PdM Person 5.3.5.4 Execute Work PM/ PdM Person 5.3.5.5 Document Work Process - 5.3.6 5.3.5 Execute PM/PdM Rev: 4 Verify Resources PM/ PdM Supervisor 5.3.5.2 Assign Personnel PM/ PdM Supervisor 5.3.5.3 New defects? NO Should it be fixed now? YES Obtain Resources Craft Person 5.3.5.7 NO NO Clean/ Store Equipment and or Tools PM/ PdM Person 5.3.5.6 YES Identify Work Process - 5.3.1 Fix It Craft Person 5.3.5.8 Date: 02/20/02 APPENDIX I - SAMPLE BUSINESS PROCESS WORK MANAGEMENT James Davis Page 7 Execute Work Process - 5.3.4 Should work package be archived? Archive Work Package Maintenance Planner 5.3.6.1 Document Maintenance History Maintenance Planner 5.3.6.3 Close Work Order Maintenance Planner 5.3.6.4 Mark-up Work Package Craft Person 5.3.6.5 Update Work Package Maintenance Planner 5.3.6.6 Was RCFA single event trigger reached? Record Event Information Needed for Failure Analysis Process - 5.3.8 END YES YES NO Was work package adequate? YES NO Identify Work Performed Craft Person 5.3.6.2 NO 5.3.6 Document Work Rev: 4 Date: 02/20/02 APPENDIX I - SAMPLE BUSINESS PROCESS WORK MANAGEMENT James Davis Page 8 Begin Analysis Prepare Backlog Exception Reports Backlog Auditor 5.3.7.2 Review Backlog and Reports Backlog Management Team 5.3.7.3 Prepare Backlog Aging Reports Backlog Auditor 5.3.7.1 Valid Work Order? Priority Appropriate? Ready to be Scheduled? Obtain Necessary Resources Maintenance Planner 5.3.7.6 Cancel the Work Order Backlog Auditor 5.3.7.4 YES YES Adjust the Priority Backlog Auditor 5.3.7.5 Schedule Work Process - 5.3.3 NO 5.3.7 Backlog Management Rev: 1 YES End End Date: 02/20/02 NO APPENDIX I - SAMPLE BUSINESS PROCESS WORK MANAGEMENT James Davis Page 9 Document Work Process - 5.3.5 Notify Reliability Engineer Area Supervisor 5.3.8.1 Classify Work Notification as RCFA Event Area Supervisor 5.3.8.2 Document Additional Data on Template/ Checklist Craft Person 5.3.8.3 Validate that Appropriate RCFA Data is Captured Reliability Engineer 5.3.8.4 Advanced Failure Analysis Process - 4.7.3 5.3..8 Record Event Information Needed for Failure Analysis Rev: 0 APPENDIX I - SAMPLE BUSINESS PROCESS WORK MANAGEMENT James Davis Page 10
Hugh R. Smith, P.Eng, PMP Principal R-Tech Technology Inc. 4319 Valencia Avenue North Vancouver, BC Canada V7N 4A7 (604) 728-0473
Hugh is a Mechanical Engineer (University of Alberta, 1987) and spent 10 years with the Cominco / Agrium family of companies working in Operations and Maintenance. In his final years with Agrium, he was the business lead for a project to reengineer maintenance and operating processes, implement RCM, and implement SAP Plant Maintenance across all of Agriums operations. For the last seven years, Hugh has worked as a management consultant initially with Cap Gemini Ernst and Young, and more recently with his own consulting company helping various clients with major projects to reengineer operations, maintenance, and work management processes and implement supporting applications. He continues to use tools such as the Deviant Cost Model to help clients develop appropriate maintenance strategies, and most recently has worked with distribution utilities to apply the cost model and risk-based maintenance techniques to distributed asset bases. Hugh has written and delivered highly acclaimed courses on maintenance methods, and has written and presented numerous articles on related subjects.